Re: [Bug 737959] Re: ping waits 5 seconds between packets if RDNS is not present
The same issue is described here: http://www.unchartedbackwaters.co.uk/pyblosxom/debian_ubuntu_dns_resolution_delays I can confirm that removing mdns4 makes the problem go away. So it's really https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/avahi/+bug/94940, please merge. -- There are actually two bugs -- the mDNS bug that you described and the fact that ping is doing a DNS lookup before sending each packet. I don't know of another operating system that does this. Usually they do one lookup before pinging, then none while pinging. Doing a ping before every packet is my mind is just silly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737959 Title: ping waits 5 seconds between packets if RDNS is not present To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iputils/+bug/737959/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 750661] [NEW] If Putty is running on the 2nd monitor selecting text causes an immediate crash
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: putty If you launch putty from the 2nd monitor and select text by click dragging, then putty immediately crashes. A work-around is to launch putty once from the 1st monitor. If you do this subsequent putty sessions on the 2nd monitor won't crash. root@jmitchel-desktop:/home/jmitchel# apt-cache policy putty putty: Installed: 0.60+2010-02-20-1 Candidate: 0.60+2010-02-20-1 Version table: *** 0.60+2010-02-20-1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/universe i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: putty 0.60+2010-02-20-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-28.50-generic-pae 2.6.35.11 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-28-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Apr 4 15:19:03 2011 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: putty ** Affects: putty (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/750661 Title: If Putty is running on the 2nd monitor selecting text causes an immediate crash -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 750661] Re: If Putty is running on the 2nd monitor selecting text causes an immediate crash
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/750661 Title: If Putty is running on the 2nd monitor selecting text causes an immediate crash -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 750661] Re: If Putty is running on the 2nd monitor selecting text causes an immediate crash
To add detail this happens if each monitor is a separate instance of X Windows. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/750661 Title: If Putty is running on the 2nd monitor selecting text causes an immediate crash -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 737959] [NEW] ping waits 5 seconds between packets if RDNS is not present
Public bug reported: If you use ping from the command line and the host you are pinging does not have a rDNS entry, then ping pauses for 5 seconds or more between packets. Since there's no output on the terminal it looks as if the host is down, but when you press Ctrl-C, you get a line about the first packet. Here's the output from ping as well as a packet capture. b.b.b.b doesn't have an rDNS entry, but c.c.c.c does. a.a.a.a = my ip address b.b.b.b = pinged.machine.com c.c.c.c = 2nd.pinged.machine.com d.d.d.d = first dns server in resolv.conf 21:56:10.348040 IP a.a.a.a.35806 d.d.d.d.domain: 19049+ A? pinged.machine.com. (39) 21:56:10.359921 IP d.d.d.d.domain a.a.a.a.35806: 19049* 1/0/0 A[|domain] 21:56:10.401162 IP a.a.a.a.35806 d.d.d.d.domain: 10575+ PTR? b.b.b.b.in-addr.arpa. (44) 21:56:10.413424 IP d.d.d.d.domain a.a.a.a.35806: 10575 NXDomain 0/1/0 (121) 21:56:15.497545 IP a.a.a.a.35806 d.d.d.d.domain: 60024+ PTR? b.b.b.b.in-addr.arpa. (44) 21:56:15.509826 IP d.d.d.d.domain a.a.a.a.35806: 60024 NXDomain 0/1/0 (121) 21:56:20.588606 IP a.a.a.a.35806 d.d.d.d.domain: 28660+ PTR? b.b.b.b.in-addr.arpa. (44) 21:56:20.624358 IP d.d.d.d.domain a.a.a.a.35806: 28660 NXDomain 0/1/0 (121) 21:56:25.671853 IP a.a.a.a.35806 d.d.d.d.domain: 63426+ PTR? b.b.b.b.in-addr.arpa. (44) 21:56:25.684198 IP d.d.d.d.domain a.a.a.a.35806: 63426 NXDomain 0/1/0 (121) me@me-desktop:~/Desktop$ ping pinged.machine.com PING pinged.machine.com (b.b.b.b) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from b.b.b.b: icmp_seq=1 ttl=124 time=41.0 ms 64 bytes from b.b.b.b: icmp_seq=2 ttl=124 time=81.0 ms 64 bytes from b.b.b.b: icmp_seq=3 ttl=124 time=76.1 ms 64 bytes from b.b.b.b: icmp_seq=4 ttl=124 time=43.3 ms --- pinged.machine.com ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 15268ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.009/60.377/81.041/18.299 ms me@me-desktop:~/Desktop$ 22:15:38.966121 IP a.a.a.a.35806 d.d.d.d.domain: 61313+ A? 2nd.machine.pinged.com. (42) 22:15:38.966447 IP a.a.a.a.35807 d.d.d.d.domain: 44215+ PTR? b.b.b.b.in-addr.arpa. (43) 22:15:38.978502 IP d.d.d.d.domain a.a.a.a.35806: 61313* 1/0/0 (58) 22:15:38.980133 IP d.d.d.d.domain a.a.a.a.35807: 44215 NXDomain* 0/1/0 (127) 22:15:38.995406 IP a.a.a.a.35808 d.d.d.d.domain: 45092+ PTR? c.c.c.c.in-addr.arpa. (43) 22:15:39.017572 IP d.d.d.d.domain a.a.a.a.35808: 45092* 1/0/0 (81) 22:15:39.991054 IP a.a.a.a.35808 d.d.d.d.domain: 48973+ PTR? c.c.c.c.in-addr.arpa. (43) 22:15:40.002881 IP d.d.d.d.domain a.a.a.a.35808: 48973* 1/0/0 (81) 22:15:40.998392 IP a.a.a.a.35808 d.d.d.d.domain: 78+ PTR? c.c.c.c.in-addr.arpa. (43) 22:15:41.010430 IP d.d.d.d.domain a.a.a.a.35808: 78* 1/0/0 (81) 22:15:41.988781 IP a.a.a.a.35808 d.d.d.d.domain: 21736+ PTR? c.c.c.c.in-addr.arpa. (43) 22:15:42.000789 IP d.d.d.d.domain a.a.a.a.35808: 21736* 1/0/0 (81) 22:15:42.996923 IP a.a.a.a.35808 d.d.d.d.domain: 43427+ PTR? c.c.c.c.in-addr.arpa. (43) 22:15:43.009297 IP d.d.d.d.domain a.a.a.a.35808: 43427* 1/0/0 (81) 22:15:43.984441 IP a.a.a.a.35808 d.d.d.d.domain: 59199+ PTR? a.a.a.a.in-addr.arpa. (41) 22:15:43.997827 IP a.a.a.a.35809 d.d.d.d.domain: 23386+ PTR? c.c.c.c.in-addr.arpa. (43) 22:15:44.009554 IP d.d.d.d.domain a.a.a.a.35809: 23386* 1/0/0 (81) 22:15:44.036071 IP d.d.d.d.domain a.a.a.a.35808: 59199 NXDomain*- 0/1/0 (118) 22:15:44.990557 IP a.a.a.a.35809 d.d.d.d.domain: 51955+ PTR? c.c.c.c.in-addr.arpa. (43) 22:15:45.002374 IP d.d.d.d.domain a.a.a.a.35809: 51955* 1/0/0 (81) me@me-desktop:~/Desktop$ ping 2nd.machine.pinged.com PING 2nd.machine.pinged.com (c.c.c.c) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 2nd.machine.pinged.com (c.c.c.c): icmp_seq=1 ttl=127 time=12.1 ms 64 bytes from 2nd.machine.pinged.com (c.c.c.c): icmp_seq=2 ttl=127 time=18.7 ms 64 bytes from 2nd.machine.pinged.com (c.c.c.c): icmp_seq=3 ttl=127 time=18.3 ms 64 bytes from 2nd.machine.pinged.com (c.c.c.c): icmp_seq=4 ttl=127 time=21.9 ms 64 bytes from 2nd.machine.pinged.com (c.c.c.c): icmp_seq=5 ttl=127 time=12.3 ms 64 bytes from 2nd.machine.pinged.com (c.c.c.c): icmp_seq=6 ttl=127 time=11.8 ms 64 bytes from 2nd.machine.pinged.com (c.c.c.c): icmp_seq=7 ttl=127 time=16.2 ms --- 2nd.machine.pinged.com ping statistics --- 8 packets transmitted, 8 received, 0% packet loss, time 7018ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 11.894/16.067/21.995/3.431 ms me@me-desktop:~/Desktop$ ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: iputils-ping 3:20071127-2ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-27.49-generic-pae 2.6.32.26+drm33.12 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-27-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Mar 18 21:50:08 2011 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: iputils ** Affects: iputils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737959 Title:
[Bug 737959] Re: ping waits 5 seconds between packets if RDNS is not present
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737959 Title: ping waits 5 seconds between packets if RDNS is not present -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 658795] Re: postfix gets confused with non-alphanumeric local hostname
It's a valid hostname (numeric sub-domains are allowed in DNS), but it's not a valid FQDN. However I'm not convinced that newaliases should fail like this. Shouldn't it just create an empty alias database? Should Postfix be policing which TLD's are valid? It seems like that should be up to the receiving MTA. BTW, AOL, Yahoo, gmail all accept mail from usern...@tosh.0: telnet f.mx.mail.yahoo.com 25 Trying 98.137.54.237... Connected to f.mx.mail.yahoo.com. Escape character is '^]'. 220 mta121.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ESMTP YSmtp service ready HELO tosh.0 250 mta121.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Mail From: t...@tosh.0 250 sender t...@tosh.0 ok RCPT To: --removed...@yahoo.com 250 recipient --remove...@yahoo.com ok quit 221 mta121.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Connection closed by foreign host. telnet mailin-04.mx.aol.com 25 Trying 64.12.90.66... Connected to mailin-04.mx.aol.com. Escape character is '^]'. 220-mtain-mb10.r1000.mx.aol.com ESMTP Internet Inbound HELO tosh.0 250 mtain-mb10.r1000.mx.aol.com Mail From: t...@tosh.0 250 2.1.0 Ok rCPT to: mailer-dae...@aol.com 250 2.1.5 Ok quit 221 2.0.0 Bye telnet alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com 25 Trying 74.125.95.27... Connected to alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com. Escape character is '^]'. 220 mx.google.com ESMTP u6si18964466ibk.60 HELO tosh.0 250 mx.google.com at your service Mail From: t...@tosh.0 250 2.1.0 OK u6si18964466ibk.60 rcpt to: --delete...@gmail.com 250 2.1.5 OK u6si18964466ibk.60 quit 221 2.0.0 closing connection u6si18964466ibk.60 -- postfix gets confused with non-alphanumeric local hostname https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 658795] Re: postfix gets confused with non-alphanumeric local hostname
It's a valid hostname (numeric sub-domains are allowed in DNS), but it's not a valid FQDN. However I'm not convinced that newaliases should fail like this. Shouldn't it just create an empty alias database? Should Postfix be policing which TLD's are valid? It seems like that should be up to the receiving MTA. BTW, AOL, Yahoo, gmail all accept mail from usern...@tosh.0: telnet f.mx.mail.yahoo.com 25 Trying 98.137.54.237... Connected to f.mx.mail.yahoo.com. Escape character is '^]'. 220 mta121.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ESMTP YSmtp service ready HELO tosh.0 250 mta121.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Mail From: t...@tosh.0 250 sender t...@tosh.0 ok RCPT To: --removed...@yahoo.com 250 recipient --remove...@yahoo.com ok quit 221 mta121.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Connection closed by foreign host. telnet mailin-04.mx.aol.com 25 Trying 64.12.90.66... Connected to mailin-04.mx.aol.com. Escape character is '^]'. 220-mtain-mb10.r1000.mx.aol.com ESMTP Internet Inbound HELO tosh.0 250 mtain-mb10.r1000.mx.aol.com Mail From: t...@tosh.0 250 2.1.0 Ok rCPT to: mailer-dae...@aol.com 250 2.1.5 Ok quit 221 2.0.0 Bye telnet alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com 25 Trying 74.125.95.27... Connected to alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com. Escape character is '^]'. 220 mx.google.com ESMTP u6si18964466ibk.60 HELO tosh.0 250 mx.google.com at your service Mail From: t...@tosh.0 250 2.1.0 OK u6si18964466ibk.60 rcpt to: --delete...@gmail.com 250 2.1.5 OK u6si18964466ibk.60 quit 221 2.0.0 closing connection u6si18964466ibk.60 -- postfix gets confused with non-alphanumeric local hostname https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 658795] [NEW] package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade:
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: postfix When upgrading from 8.04 to 10.04 the postfix alone failed. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: postfix 2.7.0-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.24-28.77-server Uname: Linux 2.6.24-28-server x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Oct 11 19:15:49 2010 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75 SourcePackage: postfix Title: package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package lucid -- package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 658795] Re: package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade:
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795/+attachment/1686411/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795/+attachment/1686412/+files/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795/+attachment/1686413/+files/VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeLspcitxt.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795/+attachment/1686414/+files/VarLogDistupgradeLspcitxt.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795/+attachment/1686415/+files/VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeSystemstatetargz.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795/+attachment/1686416/+files/VarLogDistupgradeSystemstatetargz.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795/+attachment/1686417/+files/VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz -- package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 658795] Re: package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade:
Okay, I took a closer look. The problem is that my hostname is tosh.0. Somehow this makes something think that my hostname is numeric. Here's the text: Setting up postfix (2.7.0-1) ... Postfix configuration was not changed. If you need to make changes, edit /etc/postfix/main.cf (and others) as needed. To view Postfix configuration values, see postconf(1). After modifying main.cf, be sure to run '/etc/init.d/postfix reload'. Running newaliases newaliases: warning: valid_hostname: numeric hostname: 0 newaliases: fatal: file /etc/postfix/main.cf: parameter mydomain: bad parameter value: 0 dpkg: error processing postfix (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75 Processing triggers for libc-bin ... ldconfig deferred processing now taking place Errors were encountered while processing: postfix -- package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 658795] Re: package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade:
** Attachment added: This is the file that postfix was dying on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/658795/+attachment/1686445/+files/main.cf -- package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 658795] [NEW] package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade:
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: postfix When upgrading from 8.04 to 10.04 the postfix alone failed. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: postfix 2.7.0-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.24-28.77-server Uname: Linux 2.6.24-28-server x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Oct 11 19:15:49 2010 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75 SourcePackage: postfix Title: package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package lucid -- package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 658795] Re: package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade:
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795/+attachment/1686411/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795/+attachment/1686412/+files/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795/+attachment/1686413/+files/VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeLspcitxt.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795/+attachment/1686414/+files/VarLogDistupgradeLspcitxt.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795/+attachment/1686415/+files/VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeSystemstatetargz.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795/+attachment/1686416/+files/VarLogDistupgradeSystemstatetargz.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795/+attachment/1686417/+files/VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz -- package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 658795] Re: package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade:
Okay, I took a closer look. The problem is that my hostname is tosh.0. Somehow this makes something think that my hostname is numeric. Here's the text: Setting up postfix (2.7.0-1) ... Postfix configuration was not changed. If you need to make changes, edit /etc/postfix/main.cf (and others) as needed. To view Postfix configuration values, see postconf(1). After modifying main.cf, be sure to run '/etc/init.d/postfix reload'. Running newaliases newaliases: warning: valid_hostname: numeric hostname: 0 newaliases: fatal: file /etc/postfix/main.cf: parameter mydomain: bad parameter value: 0 dpkg: error processing postfix (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75 Processing triggers for libc-bin ... ldconfig deferred processing now taking place Errors were encountered while processing: postfix -- package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 658795] Re: package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade:
** Attachment added: This is the file that postfix was dying on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/658795/+attachment/1686445/+files/main.cf -- package postfix 2.7.0-1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 494359] Re: mtrr: no more MTRRs available makes X lock up when running Firefox with ATI driver
Just got around to testing with 10.4 Beta 2 and the problem doesn't present at all. In fact the mtrr: no more MTRRs available message doesn't show up at all. So it's safe to say this is completely fixed. -- mtrr: no more MTRRs available makes X lock up when running Firefox with ATI driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494359 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 527554] [NEW] Nautilus crashes when manipulating icons on 2nd monitor
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus When trying to move icons on the second monitor (Screen 1), Nautilus will sometimes crash. Also, icons can't be moved from one screen to another. When restarting Nautilus via nautilus , I get this crash info: The program 'nautilus' received an X Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was 'BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)'. (Details: serial 158694 error_code 8 request_code 141 minor_code 2) (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.) After a few crashes, Nautilus will crash every time I try to move an icon on the 2nd monitor and I have to reboot. xorg.conf is attached ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Feb 24 23:58:46 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: nautilus 1:2.28.1-0ubuntu3 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-18.55-generic-pae SourcePackage: nautilus Uname: Linux 2.6.31-18-generic-pae i686 ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Nautilus crashes when manipulating icons on 2nd monitor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527554 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 527554] Re: Nautilus crashes when manipulating icons on 2nd monitor
** Attachment added: Current xorg.conf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39755436/xorg.conf ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39755437/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39755438/XsessionErrors.txt ** Attachment added: usr_lib_nautilus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39755439/usr_lib_nautilus.txt -- Nautilus crashes when manipulating icons on 2nd monitor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527554 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 494359] [NEW] mtrr: no more MTRRs available makes X lock up when running Firefox with ATI driver
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-mach64 On a HP Proliant DL380 G3 server with 6Gb of memory running Karmic with the pae kernel these messages show up every time X is started. The X session then becomes unresponsive. This wouldn't be such a big deal, except that vmware refuses to run without being able to run Firefox. [ 1416.069030] mtrr: no more MTRRs available [ 1416.093754] mtrr: no MTRR for f600,80 found [ 1416.095833] mtrr: no more MTRRs available [ 1445.025739] mtrr: no MTRR for f600,80 found [ 1754.224228] mtrr: no more MTRRs available [ 1754.228602] mtrr: no MTRR for f600,80 found [ 1754.230629] mtrr: no more MTRRs available [ 1779.809656] mtrr: no MTRR for f600,80 found As a workaround I'm using tightvncserver, but the keyboard mapping on that is serious messed up. But that's a separate report :) ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Dec 9 03:04:39 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: vmnet vmci vmmon Package: xserver-xorg-video-mach64 6.8.2-1 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-16.52-generic-pae SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-video-mach64 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-16-generic-pae i686 ** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-mach64 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- mtrr: no more MTRRs available makes X lock up when running Firefox with ATI driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494359 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 494359] Re: mtrr: no more MTRRs available makes X lock up when running Firefox with ATI driver
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36615491/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36615492/XsessionErrors.txt -- mtrr: no more MTRRs available makes X lock up when running Firefox with ATI driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494359 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 494358] [NEW] mtrr: no more MTRRs available makes X lock up when running Firefox with ATI driver
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-mach64 On a HP Proliant DL380 G3 server with 6Gb of memory running Karmic with the pae kernel these messages show up every time X is started. The X session then becomes unresponsive. This wouldn't be such a big deal, except that vmware refuses to run without being able to run Firefox. [ 1416.069030] mtrr: no more MTRRs available [ 1416.093754] mtrr: no MTRR for f600,80 found [ 1416.095833] mtrr: no more MTRRs available [ 1445.025739] mtrr: no MTRR for f600,80 found [ 1754.224228] mtrr: no more MTRRs available [ 1754.228602] mtrr: no MTRR for f600,80 found [ 1754.230629] mtrr: no more MTRRs available [ 1779.809656] mtrr: no MTRR for f600,80 found As a workaround I'm using tightvncserver, but the keyboard mapping on that is serious messed up. But that's a separate report :) ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Dec 9 03:04:39 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: vmnet vmci vmmon Package: xserver-xorg-video-mach64 6.8.2-1 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-16.52-generic-pae SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-video-mach64 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-16-generic-pae i686 ** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-mach64 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- mtrr: no more MTRRs available makes X lock up when running Firefox with ATI driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494358 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 494358] Re: mtrr: no more MTRRs available makes X lock up when running Firefox with ATI driver
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36615489/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36615490/XsessionErrors.txt -- mtrr: no more MTRRs available makes X lock up when running Firefox with ATI driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494358 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 494361] [NEW] tightvncserver is unusable because the keyboard mapping is incorrect
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tightvncserver I'm running tightvnc to keep the regular X server from starting (see #494358, #494359 -- sorry, I wasn't sure which set of output was needed). However, whenever I connect with a VNC client (I've tried RealVNC tightvnc under Win32 and vncviewer under Ibex) the keyboard mapping is scrambled. The middle row of the keyboard looks like abfhjk;' Backspace and del don't work either. ** Affects: tightvnc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- tightvncserver is unusable because the keyboard mapping is incorrect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494361 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 494359] Re: mtrr: no more MTRRs available makes X lock up when running Firefox with ATI driver
I need to use the hardware, so I went back to Hardy and the Xserver works fine without any tweaking. I'll be keeping the system at 8.04 while it runs vmware2, but I'll be happy to boot live CD's if someone wants me too. BTW, a similar message appears in the dmesg: [ 76.092016] mtrr: no more MTRRs available [ 76.109514] mtrr: no more MTRRs available However, I'm not getting the no more space on device errors. -- mtrr: no more MTRRs available makes X lock up when running Firefox with ATI driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494359 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 131616] Re: Always prompted for Exchange password when composing new mail; never works
Hello, I stopped using Evolution a while back and so I forgot about this bug. I can confirm that it is fixed in 8.11 Thanks, Jason M. Pedro Villavicencio wrote: Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue for you? Could you try the same with Karmic or Jaunty ? Thanks in advance. ** Changed in: evolution-exchange (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: evolution-exchange (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- Always prompted for Exchange password when composing new mail; never works https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131292] Re: dell dimension 9200 - reboot doesn't work
The issue went away for me w/ Intrepid (I was only running Hardy for a minutes before upgrading again due to some file system corruption issues). I'm running 2.6.27-10-server. What's your kernel version? If you don't know please post the output of uname -a. Thanks. -- dell dimension 9200 - reboot doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 82720] Re: ping doing LOTS of useless dns request
The importance on this needs to be raised. ping is essentially broken with certain IP addresses, DNS servers, and negative responses. Maybe the problem isn't in ping but is in the resolver library? I can't do the code myself, and it's not a problem for me to remember to do ping -n. However, this would seriously confuse a user and probably cause them to think a machine is down, when it is in fact up. -- ping doing LOTS of useless dns request https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82720 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 318097] Re: utsrelease.h states that version is 2.6.27-7
Andy Whitcroft wrote: That is unexpected as the headers are generated from the same source as the kernel in theory, and both should have been built from the same version of utsrelease.h and thus have the same value. Checking the flavour specific headers those are (as expected) flavour specific headers. They appear to have the correct version of the header file matching the version number: == ./headers-amd64/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server/include/linux/utsrelease.h == #define UTS_RELEASE 2.6.27-10-server == ./headers-i386/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server/include/linux/utsrelease.h == #define UTS_RELEASE 2.6.27-10-server I would therefore expect this to have been correct without manual intervention. Can we confirm that your installed header package is identicle to the one I have. You can find the installed package file in /var/cache/apt, something like this: md5sum /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server_*.deb I am expecting the following: a...@dm$ sum -r linux-headers-2.6.27-10* 47256 630 linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server_2.6.27-10.20_amd64.deb 00922 614 linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server_2.6.27-10.20_i386.deb a...@dm$ Also could you have a look at the installation logs from apt for when it installed the package and see what if anything it said. These are in /var/log/apt/term.log and its predecessors, searching for the package name should find it. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Andy Whitcroft (apw) Status: Triaged = In Progress ** Summary changed: - utsrelease.h states that version is 2.6.27-7 + utsrelease.h states that version is 2.6.27-7 following install of 2.6.27-10-server ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Incomplete Well, I don't have the 2.6.27-10 headers package in /var/cache/apt/archives: r...@jmitchel-desktop:/home/jmitchel# md5sum /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-2.6.27-10* md5sum: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-2.6.27-10*: No such file or directory And here's the log where they were replaced: Selecting previously deselected package linux-headers-2.6.27-11-server. Unpacking linux-headers-2.6.27-11-server (from .../linux-headers-2.6.27-11-server_2.6.27-11.22_i 386.deb) ... Preparing to replace linux-headers-generic 2.6.27.10.13 (using .../linux-headers-generic_2.6.27. 11.14_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement linux-headers-generic ... Preparing to replace linux-headers-server 2.6.27.10.13 (using .../linux-headers-server_2.6.27.11 .14_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement linux-headers-server ... And there's no other mention of 2.6.27-10 r...@jmitchel-desktop:/var/log/apt# gzcat term.*.gz | grep linux-headers-server Preparing to replace linux-headers-server 2.6.22.15.22 (using .../linux-headers-server_2.6.24.22.24_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement linux-headers-server ... Preparing to replace linux-headers-server 2.6.27.10.13 (using .../linux-headers-server_2.6.27.11.14_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement linux-headers-server ... Setting up linux-headers-server (2.6.27.11.14) ... Here's the dates on the directories in /usr/src: r...@jmitchel-desktop:/usr/src# ls -alt | more total 547724 drwxrwsr-x 28 root src 4096 2009-01-18 19:47 . drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 2009-01-18 19:47 linux-headers-2.6.27-11-server drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 2009-01-18 19:47 linux-headers-2.6.27-11-generic drwxr-xr-x 22 root root 4096 2009-01-18 19:47 linux-headers-2.6.27-11 drwxr-xr-x 26 root root 4096 2009-01-16 00:21 linux-source-2.6.27 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root src 19 2009-01-15 23:31 linux - linux-source-2.6.27 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 52018876 2009-01-15 07:30 linux-source-2.6.27.tar.bz2 drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 2008-12-21 06:18 linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2008-12-08 17:25 nvidia-173.14.12 drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 4096 2008-12-06 06:34 .. drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 2008-12-06 06:34 linux-headers-2.6.27-10-generic drwxr-xr-x 22 root root 4096 2008-12-06 06:33 linux-headers-2.6.27-10 md5sum: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-headers-2.6.27-10*: No such file or directory r...@jmitchel-desktop:/var/lib/dpkg/info# apt-get --reinstall install linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 628kB of archives. After this operation, 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com intrepid-proposed/main linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server 2.6.27-10.20 [628kB] Fetched 628kB in 1s (616kB/s) (Reading database ... 284890 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server 2.6.27-10.20 (using
[Bug 82720] Re: ping doing LOTS of useless dns request
** Description changed: Description: When the user is doing ping -f myhostname.tld, ping does a ipaddr-hostname request at EACH packet. Which is quite a lot when used with a -f option. Moreover it is quite useless as when used with -f, ping doesnt display the result of the ipaddr-hostname, but only a single dot per packet. - I discovered this when implementing a nss plugin (/etc/nsswitch.conf kindof stuff). - I dunno the actual impact of this, just seems like very inefficient. - But if the nss plugin doesn't have an request cache, this will become quite a denial of service for this service + + -gjarboni's addition-- + + Actually, this can be a lot worse in certain cases. For example, try + pinging dnstest.bigjar.com. You can't reproduce this in text but what + happens is: + + Pinging machine sends out ICMP echo request + Pinging machine sends out in-addr.arpa DNS query (ip address - DNS name) + Pinging machine receives NXDOMAIN (no such record) from DNS server + -- 5 to 10 seconds pass -- + Pinging machine prints: + 64 bytes from 12.173.97.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=252 time=20.9 ms + + This happens for every packet. If you interrupt ping during the 5 to 10 + second period it will print the 64 bytes from ... bit before returning + to the shell prompt. + + I shudder to imagine someone trying to walk a user through testing + connectivity with this bug. It also occurs in Debian 4.0. + + I have packet traces and a much more detailed write up if anyone is + interested. This bug doesn't happen with all IP addresses that don't + have a hostname associated with them, just certain ones, but it appears + to specific to certain name servers. -- ping doing LOTS of useless dns request https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82720 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318097] [NEW] utsrelease.h states that version is 2.6.27-7
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-headers-2.6.27-10-server Just as the summary says. utsrelease.h says the version is 2.6.27-7 (or something very close), rather than saying 2.6.27-10-server. This confuses the VMWare 2.0 installer to the point where it won't function. The complaint is that the version of the kernel doesn't match the version of the headers. Changing utsrelease.h to #define UTS_RELEASE 2.6.27-10-server allows VMWare 2.0 to install and function normally. So I'm guessing the change should have been made and this is just an oversight I'm using 8.10 as a workstation with the server kernel for the PAE support. Of course, now that I look further, this is fixed in linux- headers-2.6.27-11-server. But I think 2.6.27-10-server is still the default server kernel for Ibex, so this might bear fixing. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- utsrelease.h states that version is 2.6.27-7 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318097 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131292] Re: dell dimension 9200 - reboot doesn't work
I'll confirm that the bug is still present in gutsy Desktop release. I'm recompiling a 2.6.22 kernel now (to add PAE support). I'll add a note if that causes any change. -- dell dimension 9200 - reboot doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131616] Re: Always prompted for Exchange password when composing new mail; never works
Actually, I made the prompt go away by changing the Auto completion preferences for the Exchange account. Go to the Edit menu, choose Preferences. In the window that pop up, choose AutoCompletion and uncheck Global Address List under your Exchange account. -- Always prompted for Exchange password when composing new mail; never works https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131616] Re: Always prompted for Exchange password when composing new mail; never works
Here's a screen shot of the window I'm talking about (with my Exchange email address blacked out). ** Attachment added: Evolution Screen Shot http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10307981/Screenshot-Evolution%20Preferences.png -- Always prompted for Exchange password when composing new mail; never works https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131616] Re: Always prompted for Exchange password when composing new mail; never works
I did some research and I have a solution (but it's somewhat ugly). The first part is to specify a server in the Global Catalog list/ Active Directory box. That's under the Edit menu. Preferences, select the Exchange account, select Edit, then click the Receiving options tab. The ugly part is that your sysadmin has to allow access to port 3268, which probably won't be available if you are accessing your Exchange server over the internet using OWA. Allowing the world to access your Global Catalog server doesn't seem very secure :) -- Always prompted for Exchange password when composing new mail; never works https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131616] Re: Always prompted for Exchange password when composing new mail; never works
One more thing. This bug happens even if you create a message in another account in Evolution. It really only makes sense to pull up the Active Directory user list if you're going to be using Exchange to send the message. -- Always prompted for Exchange password when composing new mail; never works https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
