[Bug 648319] Re: [needs-packaging] emelfm2 0.7.5
0.7.5 is out now. Would be nice to see emelFM2 packaged in Ubuntu. Version 0.4.1 is very, very old since the app has much evolved since. ** Summary changed: - [needs-packaging] emelfm2 0.7.3 + [needs-packaging] emelfm2 0.7.5 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648319 Title: [needs-packaging] emelfm2 0.7.5 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 609280] Re: Grub error : symbol grub_xputs not found
To work around this (annoying) bug see [1], specifically Section 13 Reinstalling GRUB 2 from LiveCD [1] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1195275 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609280 Title: Grub error : symbol grub_xputs not found -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 496435] Re: upgrades of the grub-pc package can overwrite wrong MBR
To work around this (annoying) bug see [1], specifically Section 13 Reinstalling GRUB 2 from LiveCD [1] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1195275 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496435 Title: upgrades of the grub-pc package can overwrite wrong MBR -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 496435] Re: upgrades of the grub-pc package can overwrite wrong MBR
To work around this (annoying) bug see [1], specifically Section 13 Reinstalling GRUB 2 from LiveCD [1] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1195275 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496435 Title: upgrades of the grub-pc package can overwrite wrong MBR -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 655950] Re: Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option results in OS and data loss
This is a nasty looking bug indeed! And quite irresponsible from Canonical to continue shipping this bug. A 10.10.1 would have been a wiser decision. Luckily I was already alert that Ubuntu could ship data-loss installer bugs (faulty grub or mbr, etc.) so I take special care to first check out the forums. Then I'll back up mbr and stray away from any 'auto' partitioning options -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655950 Title: Maverick ubiquity confusion w/ auto-resize option results in OS and data loss -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 596545] Re: About info doenst opens.
Bug fixed upstream in v1.0.0. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596545 Title: About info doenst opens. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105458] Re: [needs-packaging] HandBrake
Would it help that debian-multimedia already provides Handbrake packages in its repo? http://debian-multimedia.org/pool/main/h/handbrake/handbrake.php -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105458 Title: [needs-packaging] HandBrake -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105458] Re: [needs-packaging] HandBrake
Two more comments: - there's is also a ppa repo for handbrake, but unfortunately without the GTK version and a bit dated https://launchpad.net/~handbrake-ubuntu/+archive/ppa - ogmrip is not a perfect substitute. It is OK for dealing with DVD sources, but it cannot handle simple multimedia files as inputs: one cannot use it to transcode a video file to another format/codec -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105458 Title: [needs-packaging] HandBrake -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105458] Re: [needs-packaging] HandBrake
Sorry for so much spam. The ppa repo actually contains the GTK package, but no packages for 10.10 https://launchpad.net/~handbrake-ubuntu/+archive/ppa/+packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105458 Title: [needs-packaging] HandBrake -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 353449] Re: lyx 1.6.x impossibly slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353449 On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: evince is not qt based, so i cant imagine what can cause such interference. do yo se some clipboard manager btw? I don't, but I am not the author of the comment. I can ask, though. Could there be some connection between evince and LyX (related to forward/backward search)? I don't think 1.6.7 provides this functionality, unless the user is using some fancy config. In any case, I have Xubuntu 10.04 on 64 bit with LyX 1.6.7, and I cannot reproduce this. I've been using LyX and Evince for a long time now, and I've never encountered anything similar. Regards Liviu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353449 Title: lyx 1.6.x impossibly slow -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 353449] Re: lyx 1.6.x impossibly slow
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Could there be some connection between evince and LyX (related to forward/backward search)? I've been reading the descriptions in the bug report, and I'm wondering if some of them are not related to the table painting issues that were discussed some time ago on the list (tables are re-drawn on each cursor movement). Another possibility is the slow-downs caused by outline with a complicated document structure. But the one that you've forwarded looks strange, indeed. Regards Liviu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353449 Title: lyx 1.6.x impossibly slow -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 353449] Re: lyx 1.6.x impossibly slow
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Liviu Andronic wrote: I don't think 1.6.7 provides this functionality, unless the user is using some fancy config. but if he uses, then backward search using lyx pipes can be related, the pipe handling code is dark enough ;) anyway, the comment: It persists in lyx 2.0.0. My solutions is to switch to console mode and back again, ctrl+alt+F1 and then ctrl+alt+F8(F7). Then the speed is great, for a while...;) is even more weird workaround for the slowness bug. it could be that we are encoutering something even deeper than qt's - X related behaviour. it would be fantastic if anybody who is experiencing this bug can make some deeper profiling. gdb or valgrind? Or some other technique? Liviu pavel -- Do you know how to read? http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader Do you know how to write? http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353449 Title: lyx 1.6.x impossibly slow -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317294] Re: [needs-packaging] htpdate package request as alternative to ntpdate and rdate clients
** Summary changed: - [needs-packaging] htp package request as alternative to ntpdate and rdate clients + [needs-packaging] htpdate package request as alternative to ntpdate and rdate clients -- [needs-packaging] htpdate package request as alternative to ntpdate and rdate clients https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 591140] Re: where is tlmgr?!?!
OK, I see. Thanks for sharing the info. After several 'tlmgr' searches on Google, Launchpad and Brainstorm didn't reveal much other than this bug and the idea, I felt compelled to raise the noise. Apparently it was already too loud. Unfortunately I'm no perl developer and my help would do little good. Thanks for working on this feature -- where is tlmgr?!?! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591140 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 591140] Re: where is tlmgr?!?!
There's been a long discussion on the topic on lyx-users [1]. I also see it as a major (and quite disturbing) missing feature of TeXLive on Ubuntu [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org/msg82446.html -- where is tlmgr?!?! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591140 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 591140] Re: where is tlmgr?!?!
There is also a related brainstorm idea [1]. Please vote if you're affected [1] http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/11449/ -- where is tlmgr?!?! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591140 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 637623] [NEW] v 0.99.6 100627 released
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: chntpw New upstream release [1] for chntpw. [1] http://pogostick.net/~pnh/ntpasswd/HISTORY.txt ** Affects: chntpw (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- v 0.99.6 100627 released https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637623 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 502587] Re: Please remove xfce4-governor-plugin (universe) from the archive
The plug-in indeed crashes quite often disappearing from the panel, while the Properties dialogue does not open. However it is by no means useless. It is very handy in switching from ondemand to powersave and back in order to prevent newish laptops from over-heating (those that have several cores, especially from AMD). It would of course be nice if the Debian devels imported it to unstable. But please do not remove it. -- Please remove xfce4-governor-plugin (universe) from the archive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502587 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
