[Bug 1967784] Re: After install reboot was unsuccessful with dark screen.
Note: This bug-report was sent from 21.10 running off a USB installation stick! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967784 Title: After install reboot was unsuccessful with dark screen. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1967784/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1967784] [NEW] After install reboot was unsuccessful with dark screen.
Public bug reported: Installation of 21.10 beta 4-2-2022 went well. Both screens were normal and active. Reboot did not produce a screen to login, they were both dark following the DELL post screen. I have a DELL XPS I5 with two monitors. One on DVI and the other a Display Video connection. Both screens dark. I am also using an MSATA1 SSD as a hard drive. Description:Ubuntu Jammy Jellyfish (development branch) Release:22.04 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:22.04.7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-23.23-generic 5.15.27 Uname: Linux 5.15.0-23-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu79 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CasperVersion: 1.468 CrashDB: ubuntu CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Mon Apr 4 16:59:07 2022 LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Beta amd64 (20220329.1) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader Symptom: dist-upgrade UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967784 Title: After install reboot was unsuccessful with dark screen. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1967784/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1876506] Re: eoan to focal upgrade hangs when lvm snapshot is present
I apologize if this is not relevant to this blocking bug. I am trying to help a friend. Machine is dual boot Windows 10 and Ubuntu 18.04 Has Extended Partition where Ubuntu went into Parition 5. Machine worked fine with 18.04. Tried upgrade offered to Ubuntu 19,04 which failed and won't no longer boots to Ubuntu selection from GRUB but Windows still boots. Tried a fresh install of 20.04 which resulted in: error: file '/boot/grub/i386-pc/normal.mod' not found. Entering rescue mode... So won't boot either OS now. I am hopeful to do a fresh install of Ubuntu 18.04-5 next in hopes that the machine will work again. Attached is the Disk partitioning table if this is of interest. ** Attachment added: "Partioin info." https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/os-prober/+bug/1876506/+attachment/5402221/+files/mort-disk.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876506 Title: eoan to focal upgrade hangs when lvm snapshot is present To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/os-prober/+bug/1876506/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292041] Re: Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen
Please see Bug # 1612010 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292041 Title: Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1292041/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1612010] [NEW] Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen
Public bug reported: Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen (saw it via Bug # 1292041 now closed) Ctrl=Alt+L or Super+L shortcut works and blanks the screen requiring me to type my password again to activate session. However my System-Settings -> Brightness & Lock is set to: Turn screen off when inactive for: 30 minutes Lock: OFF Lock screen after: Screen turns off (is grayed out) Require my password when waking from suspend (unchecked and grayed out) I have dual monitors. Both are Samsung and this feature is highly intermittent, meaning sometimes it works and often it doesn't. For example it hasn't worked for days but I changed the System-Settings from 30-minutes to 1-min. and it started working without a reboot. Is it possible that a kernel update changes some value that alters the setting? Then when I change the time in the window it repopulates a value? I am on Ubuntu 16.04.1 but I have seen this issue for years now. ** Affects: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1612010 Title: Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/1612010/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 791506] Re: Using an external USB microphone.
This bug is still happening in both 12.04 and 12.10. Simple to reproduce. Use laptop with analogue built in Microphone. Plug in a USB Microphone and switch to it. When rebooting Ubuntu the analogue microphone is re-activated and NOT the last Microphone used which was the USB Microphone. In addition going to Sound Settings and clicking on Input will cause the Microphone to fall off the USB Microphone and onto the built in Analogue Microphone forcing the user to then reselect the USB Microphone. What is the likely hood of this ever getting fixed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791506 Title: Using an external USB microphone. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/791506/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 791506] Re: Using an external USB microphone.
I am rummy, I meant to say 14.04 and 14.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791506 Title: Using an external USB microphone. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/791506/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1251020] [NEW] uucp hangs during install from Ubuntu Software Center
Public bug reported: I have used uucp over TCP for years. From the Ubuntu Software Center the installation attempt hangs and never completes for Saucy., 13.10. I have been using it for years. The hang takes place on both a 64-bit and 32-bit machine. Please fix the software center so that it will complete the requested download. The software center shows Version: uucp 1.07-20build2 ** Affects: uucp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to uucp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251020 Title: uucp hangs during install from Ubuntu Software Center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uucp/+bug/1251020/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1251020] Re: uucp hangs during install from Ubuntu Software Center
This can be closed. It turned out that the hang was caused by a window hidden behind the Software Center with a question requiring input via the mouse click. Sorry! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to uucp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251020 Title: uucp hangs during install from Ubuntu Software Center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uucp/+bug/1251020/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1251020] Re: uucp hangs during install from Ubuntu Software Center
** Changed in: uucp (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to uucp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251020 Title: uucp hangs during install from Ubuntu Software Center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uucp/+bug/1251020/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1251020] [NEW] uucp hangs during install from Ubuntu Software Center
Public bug reported: I have used uucp over TCP for years. From the Ubuntu Software Center the installation attempt hangs and never completes for Saucy., 13.10. I have been using it for years. The hang takes place on both a 64-bit and 32-bit machine. Please fix the software center so that it will complete the requested download. The software center shows Version: uucp 1.07-20build2 ** Affects: uucp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251020 Title: uucp hangs during install from Ubuntu Software Center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uucp/+bug/1251020/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1251020] Re: uucp hangs during install from Ubuntu Software Center
This can be closed. It turned out that the hang was caused by a window hidden behind the Software Center with a question requiring input via the mouse click. Sorry! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251020 Title: uucp hangs during install from Ubuntu Software Center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uucp/+bug/1251020/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1251020] Re: uucp hangs during install from Ubuntu Software Center
** Changed in: uucp (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251020 Title: uucp hangs during install from Ubuntu Software Center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uucp/+bug/1251020/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1116315] Re: Sound recording with Ubuntu 12 on EeePC 1001PX
I was disappointed to find that on both 13.04 and 13.10 that Sound Recorder is still broken. It looks like we don't have a maintainer. Audacity does work so at least we have a work around. My Grandson uses Sound Recorder to practice his Saxaphone and it is used for other purposes as well by me. It is still downloadable via the Software Center so I would make a plea for some kind person who knows how to debug and fix this simple and easy to use application. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1116315 Title: Sound recording with Ubuntu 12 on EeePC 1001PX To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sound-recorder/+bug/1116315/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1198497] [NEW] Installation fails when fdisk doesn't have enough spare slots
Public bug reported: Multiple times now Ubuntu installation fails without any information when the fdisk table is full. I.E. no spare slots to create an extended partition. This has happened on multiple HP machines with WIndows 7 pre-loaded where a restore partition is present along with the normal NTFS for Windows 7 and another partition from the factory. The issue I am concerned about is that all versions of Ubuntu through 13.04 just hang and the user is left wondering what happened. I would like to see a proper check made for no fdisk partition available and a coherent message put up on the screen telling the user what has happened. Perhaps they need to install a second hard drive.In my case I used gpart to remove the restore partion since I had backup drives and then the installation went well. Again, it is the hang with no feedback to the user that I am concerned about. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1198497 Title: Installation fails when fdisk doesn't have enough spare slots To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1198497/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1198497] Re: Installation fails when fdisk doesn't have enough spare slots
Here is the actual gparted snapshot from the last time I had an installation fail. Keep mind that this has happened on many machines and I think a user friendly message is mandatory rather than no message on failure. ** Attachment added: Screenshot from 2013-07-02 01:36:51.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1198497/+attachment/3727247/+files/Screenshot%20from%202013-07-02%2001%3A36%3A51.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1198497 Title: Installation fails when fdisk doesn't have enough spare slots To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1198497/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 886975] Re: Lenovo sound chip Conexant CX20549 Venice doesn't work correctly.
I really appreciate your working on this. Unfortunately the computer with the problem is owned by a friend in another town. I don't often see him and certainly don't want to upset his stability. If no one else can do this then I would consider driving to him and trying the fix. I was just hoping to have it fixed magically during one of the upcoming updates from Ubuntu. Cheers, Bob On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Joseph Salisbury joseph.salisb...@canonical.com wrote: Would it be possible for you to test the latest upstream kernel? Refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Please test the latest v3.7 kernel[0] (Not a kernel in the daily directory) and install both the linux-image and linux-image-extra .deb packages. If this bug is fixed in the mainline kernel, please add the following tag 'kernel-fixed-upstream'. If the mainline kernel does not fix this bug, please add the tag: 'kernel-bug-exists-upstream'. If you are unable to test the mainline kernel, for example it will not boot, please add the tag: 'kernel-unable-to-test-upstream'. Once testing of the upstream kernel is complete, please mark this bug as Confirmed. Thanks in advance. [0] http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.7-rc6-raring/ ** Changed in: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886975 Title: Lenovo sound chip Conexant CX20549 Venice doesn't work correctly. Status in “alsa-driver” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: Computer: IBM Lenovo Thinkpad R61i Card: HDA Intel Sound chip: Conexant CX20549 (Venice) Device: 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller [8086:284b] (rev 03) Subsystem: Lenovo ThinkPad T61 [17aa:20ac] System: Ubuntu Oneiric 11.10 (desktop-i386) Kernel: 3.0.0-12-generic-pae#20-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 7 16:37:17 UTC 2011 Problems: 1) Integrated microphone doesn't work at all because the driver uses node 0x14 instead of 0x15 for integrated mic and node 0x12 instead of 0x14 for external mic. 2) Sound output is muted in the 0% - unamplified part of the volume slider and is working in the unamplified - 100% - part only; the driver doesn't allow amplified part because sound is distorted over 0dB of the PCM level so there is no need amplified part of the volume slider. Solution: Attached patch is fixing nodes of integrated and external microphone and is removing the amplified part of the volume slider. --- AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24. ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: i386 ArecordDevices: List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: CONEXANT Analog [CONEXANT Analog] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: c4pp4 1698 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/pcmC0D0p: c4pp4 1698 F...m pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] Adresář nebo soubor neexistuje Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xfe10 irq 48' Mixer name : 'Conexant CX20549 (Venice)' Components : 'HDA:14f15045,17aa20db,00100100' Controls : 19 Simple ctrls : 10 Card29.Amixer.info: Card hw:29 'ThinkPadEC'/'ThinkPad Console Audio Control at EC reg 0x30, fw 7KHT24WW-1.08' Mixer name : 'ThinkPad EC 7KHT24WW-1.08' Components : '' Controls : 1 Simple ctrls : 1 Card29.Amixer.values: Simple mixer control 'Console',0 Capabilities: pswitch pswitch-joined penum Playback channels: Mono Mono: Playback [on] DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=6e091b39-d59a-4d75-a7c5-dec246d020e5 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release i386 (20111012) MachineType: LENOVO 89329ZG Package: linux (not installed) PccardctlIdent: Socket 0: no product info available PccardctlStatus: Socket 0: no card ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-12-generic-pae root=UUID=666241df-0a9e-4711-a44e-92d2e6f5eccc ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic-pae 3.0.4 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-3.0.0-12-generic-pae N/A linux-backports-modules-3.0.0-12-generic-pae N/A linux-firmware1.60 Tags: oneiric Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic-pae i686 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare vboxusers dmi.bios.date: 04/09/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO dmi.bios.version: 7OETC4WW (2.24 ) dmi.board.name: 89329ZG dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
[Bug 391227] Re: [FUJITSU SIEMENS LIFEBOOK S6410] hibernate/resume failure
The issue stil exists. It screen is just black but not in hibernate mode and if i wanna come back to the system it dont do anything, the screen remains black, only a hard reset by use the power button solve the problem and start the Lifebook again. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391227 Title: [FUJITSU SIEMENS LIFEBOOK S6410] hibernate/resume failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/391227/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135088] Re: Resume from hibernate not working
FSC s6410 Ubuntu 12.04 LTS The Bug still exists. The screen is just black but not in hibernate mode and if i wanna come back to the system it dont do anything, the screen remains black, only a hard reset by use the power button solve the problem and start the Lifebook again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135088 Title: Resume from hibernate not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acpi-support/+bug/135088/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886975] Re: Lenovo sound chip Conexant CX20549 Venice doesn't work correctly.
Anyone have a clue when a fix might make it into an update or a release? My friend doesn't want to do a patch but prefers to wait for an official fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886975 Title: Lenovo sound chip Conexant CX20549 Venice doesn't work correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/886975/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1015732] [NEW] Double entry for Skype in Software Center not seen in Synaptic
Public bug reported: I am noticing that the Software Center has two entries on my system for Skype. They are both identical although different wording. Mine says: Skype (followed by stars (502)) skype (Notice the lowercase 's' in Skype. Then below is another instance that reads: Skype (followed by stars (502)) Skype Internet Telephony Both are shown as installed although only one Skype has been installed. Skype claims this is a bug in the SoftWare Center but so far I can't figure out where the entries really are and what to do about. If I delete one of these then Skype is gone and I am convinced by clicking on More Info that they are the same version of SKype. Now what I have determined is that this only happens when Ubuntu 12.04 was not freshly installed but was done via the upgrade method over the Internet. If one does a fresh install then the Software Center does not have the duplication. Does anyone else see this or have an idea how I can clean it up? I would prefer to get responses from people who have also seen this and have found a solution rather than rampant speculation. I can send a screen shot to anyone requesting directly to their email account. LSB Version: core-2.0-amd64:core-2.0-noarch:core-3.0-amd64:core-3.0-noarch:core-3.1-amd64:core-3.1-noarch:core-3.2-amd64:core-3.2-noarch:core-4.0-amd64:core-4.0-noarch Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Release: 12.04 Codename: precise Linux felton 3.2.0-25-generic #40-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 23 20:30:51 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ii skype 4.0.0.7-1 Skype -- apt-cache policy skype skype: Installed: 4.0.0.7-1 Candidate: 4.0.0.7-1 Version table: *** 4.0.0.7-1 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.2.0.35-0precise3 0 500 http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/ precise/partner amd64 Packages --- ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: software-center 5.2.2.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-25.40-generic 3.2.18 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-25-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Jun 20 10:54:38 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: software-center UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-27 (54 days ago) ** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015732 Title: Double entry for Skype in Software Center not seen in Synaptic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1015732/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1015732] Re: Double entry for Skype in Software Center not seen in Synaptic
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015732 Title: Double entry for Skype in Software Center not seen in Synaptic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1015732/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 891613] Re: Skype Icon shows twice while seaching for it at software-center
I am not 100% sure of this comment but I think the double entries only show up when Ubuntu 11.04 has been installed via an upgrade path. Fresh install seems to fix the double entry issue for Skype. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891613 Title: Skype Icon shows twice while seaching for it at software-center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/891613/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 891613] Re: Skype Icon shows twice while seaching for it at software-center
I did some testing and now have some new insight for the lucky person that might help out with this issue. If I do a fresh install of Ubuntu 11.10 and then bring up the Software Center it shows Skype as something I can click on. If I install Skype that way two bad things happen. 1) I get the now discontinued version of Skype instead of the new one released recently. 2) I get the double entries being discussed here once the older Skype is installed in this manor. Once I take this path even if I remove the older version and use the method described below I always get double entries. I think the older version which was public was skype-2.2.0.2.28 However, If I download from Skype the now shipping version of skype_precise_4.0.0.7-1_amd64.deb or the 32-bit version if that is what is needed and double click on it. The Software Center then offers to install it. When this completes I only see the one entry and all is well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891613 Title: Skype Icon shows twice while seaching for it at software-center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/891613/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 891613] Re: Skype Icon shows twice while seaching for it at software-center
Synaptic shows a single entry so I don't see any issue with it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891613 Title: Skype Icon shows twice while seaching for it at software-center To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/891613/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 982357] Re: I can not get proper resolution for my Samsung SyncMaster 226BW monitor
Bypassing my KVM as you suggested resolved the issue. I appologize for bugreporting this considering that I should have done this test first. Many thanks for your help. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/982357 Title: I can not get proper resolution for my Samsung SyncMaster 226BW monitor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/982357/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 982357] [NEW] I can not get proper resolution for my Samsunjg SyncMaster 226BW monitor
Public bug reported: My monitor is a Samsung SyncMaster 226BW. It has an optimal resolution of 1680x1050 which Ubuntu 12.04 is not finding. All I get is 1024x768. I am able to manually set the optimal resolution with the xrandr command although I am still having trouble making it stick through a reboot or relogin. -- A file called .xsession-errors gets created in my $HOME directory upon each login session. Here is the output from that file. Backend : gconf Integration : true Profile : unity Adding plugins (gnome-settings-daemon:1574): color-plugin-WARNING **: failed to get edid: unable to get EDID for output (gnome-settings-daemon:1574): color-plugin-WARNING **: unable to get EDID for xrandr-VGA1: unable to get EDID for output Initializing core options...done Initializing composite options...done Initializing opengl options...done Initializing decor options...done ** Message: applet now removed from the notification area Initializing vpswitch options...done Initializing snap options...done Initializing mousepoll options...done ** Message: using fallback from indicator to GtkStatusIcon Initializing resize options...done Initializing place options...done Initializing move options...done Initializing wall options...done Initializing grid options...done I/O warning : failed to load external entity /home/rll/.compiz/session/108d9cbc59a3a7f0513344503244871370015280034 Initializing session options...done Initializing gnomecompat options...done Initializing animation options...done Initializing fade options...done Initializing unitymtgrabhandles options...done Initializing workarounds options...done Initializing scale options...done compiz (expo) - Warn: failed to bind image to texture Initializing expo options...done Initializing ezoom options...done (compiz:1594): GConf-CRITICAL **: gconf_client_add_dir: assertion `gconf_valid_key (dirname, NULL)' failed Initializing unityshell options...done Setting Update main_menu_key Setting Update run_key ** Message: moving back from GtkStatusIcon to indicator (gnome-settings-daemon:1574): libappindicator-CRITICAL **: app_indicator_set_label: assertion `IS_APP_INDICATOR (self)' failed (gnome-settings-daemon:1574): libappindicator-CRITICAL **: app_indicator_set_label: assertion `IS_APP_INDICATOR (self)' failed --- Here is the output from me trying get-edid for futher information. sudo get-edid | parse-edid parse-edid: parse-edid version 2.0.0 get-edid: get-edid version 2.0.0 Performing real mode VBE call Interrupt 0x10 ax=0x4f00 bx=0x0 cx=0x0 Function supported Call successful VBE version 300 VBE string at 0x2110 Intel(r)Lakeport-G Graphics Chip Accelerated VGA BIOS VBE/DDC service about to be called Report DDC capabilities Performing real mode VBE call Interrupt 0x10 ax=0x4f15 bx=0x0 cx=0x0 Function supported Call successful Monitor and video card combination does not support DDC1 transfers Monitor and video card combination does not support DDC2 transfers 0 seconds per 128 byte EDID block transfer Screen is not blanked during DDC transfer Reading next EDID block VBE/DDC service about to be called Read EDID Performing real mode VBE call Interrupt 0x10 ax=0x4f15 bx=0x1 cx=0x0 Function supported Call failed The EDID data should not be trusted as the VBE call failed Error: output block unchanged parse-edid: IO error reading EDID rll@rll-OptiPlex-GX620:~$ clear rll@rll-OptiPlex-GX620:~$ cat monitor.out My monitor is a Samsung SyncMaster 226BW. It has an optimal resolution of 1680x1050 which Ubuntu 12.04 is not finding. All I get is 1024x768. I am able to manually set the optimal resolution with the xrandr command although I am still having trouble making it stick through a reboot or relogin. -- A file called .xsession-errors gets created in my $HOME directory upon each login session. Here is the output from that file. Backend : gconf Integration : true Profile : unity Adding plugins (gnome-settings-daemon:1574): color-plugin-WARNING **: failed to get edid: unable to get EDID for output (gnome-settings-daemon:1574): color-plugin-WARNING **: unable to get EDID for xrandr-VGA1: unable to get EDID for output Initializing core options...done Initializing composite options...done Initializing opengl options...done Initializing decor options...done ** Message: applet now removed from the notification area Initializing vpswitch options...done Initializing snap options...done Initializing mousepoll options...done ** Message: using fallback from indicator to GtkStatusIcon Initializing resize options...done Initializing place options...done Initializing
[Bug 982357] Re: I can not get proper resolution for my Samsunjg SyncMaster 226BW monitor
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/982357 Title: I can not get proper resolution for my Samsunjg SyncMaster 226BW monitor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/982357/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 982357] Re: I can not get proper resolution for my Samsunjg SyncMaster 226BW monitor
This issue has been observed throughout many previous versions of Ubuntu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/982357 Title: I can not get proper resolution for my Samsunjg SyncMaster 226BW monitor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/982357/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 843431] Re: Logitech camera microphone does not work
I did a fresh install of Ubuntu Beta 2 and the microphone now works for me. I'll let the original reporter status this and close it if he no longer has the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/843431 Title: Logitech camera microphone does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/843431/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 843431] Re: Logitech camera microphone does not work
Latest 3.0.0-11.18 kernel didn't help for me either. I am using a Logitech C910. Camera works but not the microphone. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/843431 Title: Logitech camera microphone does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/843431/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep
I finally got up the nerve to add the kernel to my Intel based 64-bit system. The error message is indeed gone. I got out a stop watch and the boot time for me is 25-seconds prior and after the patch so no increase in speed booting but I don't have to look at the error message any longer which is nice. 25-seconds booting is pretty phenomenal in my view. Thanks Andy and sorry for the delay. Bob -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642421 Title: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep
Once i figured out to install headers-all before headers, it went smoothly - thanks so much for the patch! -- I have been resisting putting the patch on as I share this machine with others and I didn't want to upset anything or screw up in the order. I suppose I could just boot from one of the other kernels if something went wrong. Perhaps someone who has been successful, apparently all of you might post an extra procedure for those that are used to just going through the normal update options. Will this patch be released as an update? I have a 64-bit machine. It looks like I need to install: linux-image-2.6.35-25-generic_2.6.35-25.43lp642421v201101091714_amd64.deb linux-headers-2.6.35-25_2.6.35-25.43lp642421v201101091714_all.deb linux- headers-2.6.35-25-generic_2.6.35-25.43lp642421v201101091714_amd64.deb Then do I reboot and come up on this and then apply the patch or apply the patch straight away while running the older kernel? 0001-UBUNTU-SAUCE-ensure-root-is-ready-before-running-use.patch Do I just type as root: patch 0001-UBUNTU-SAUCE-ensure-root-is-ready-before-running-use.patch Does it matter what directory the above patch file is in when I run the patch command? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642421 Title: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep
Its not clear to me that I would call it a cosmetic issue since quite a delay is introduced on each boot. Does the fix eliminate that delay? Also, what is considered cosmetic to a programmer is not cosmetic to grandpa or an ordinary user of the OS in my opinion. Will this patch be distributed in a normal update sometime soon? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642421 Title: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366535] Re: Kubuntu registers itself in /boot/grub/menu.lst as Ubuntu
Out of curiosity, why do a dual boot at all? Instead I was thinking one could install Ubuntu and then also install the KDE desktop. At login time you are allowed to choose which of many desktops you want to run for the session. This would give you both worlds without having to tie up so much disk space along with the added complexity of a dual boot I would think. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366535 Title: Kubuntu registers itself in /boot/grub/menu.lst as Ubuntu -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep
Perhaps someone can explain to me why Ubuntu hasn't released a patch to fix this issue? Given the number of people having the issue and the dialogue that has taken place one would think something substantive would have happened by now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642421 Title: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep
sudo update-initramfs -c -k 2.6.35-22-generic worked without an error message but did not solve the problem for me being discussed here. -- Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642421 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep
I could easily be mis-remembering but after doing an upgrade from 10.04 - 10.10 everything worked fine. This system is an I5 64-bit installation and it has Ugh, windows 7 as a bootable partition. I never boot into Windows 7 but a relative needed something done from Windows 7 so I did allowed it to get the latest updates. After that I could no longer boot into Ubuntu or Windows 7 as Windows 7 had rewritten the MBR. To fix this I followed the following article. https://help.ubuntu.com/community/RecoveringUbuntuAfterInstallingWindows Which told me to do: sudo grub-install --root-directory=/media/0d104aff-ec8c-44c8-b811-92b993823444 /dev/sda Where I replaced the hex numbers with mine.This allowed me to see grub2 menus and select Ubuntu again. All went well, except that is when I noticed the issue we are discussing here. -- Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642421 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep
What bothers me is that the error message is not accurate. modprobe: FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep: No such file or directory modprobe: FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep: No such file or directory When I go to this directory/folder here is what I see. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 278561 2010-10-19 20:00 /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep -- Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642421 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 545065] Re: pulseaudio ratelimit.c messages and jittery sound
I could stop the ratelimit.c messages bei changing the log-level. To do that edit /etc/pulse/daemon.conf: Change the line: ;log-level = notice into: log-level = error I don't have stottering. -- pulseaudio ratelimit.c messages and jittery sound https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545065 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 353126] Re: Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx driver using X.org prior to release 7.5
Bryce, If you are on Skype contact me via separate email and we can test this out and have clarify the issue. I am about 96% sure that I tested this with the non-proprietary nvidia driver with a friend and we still had the problem. If that is the case I am not happy about the bug being closed. Bob --- On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Josh ma...@foxcub.net wrote: the xserver task can be closed, and instead the issue should be raised directly to NVIDIA, ATI, and virtualbox to provide the missing support. If three vendors are having the same problem, then the problem is probably with the Vino server, not with all three vendors' products. Perhaps you should check with the Vino server folks or consider replacing Vino with something that works. -- Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx driver using X.org prior to release 7.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353126 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in GNOME Remote Desktop: Incomplete Status in X.Org X server: Confirmed Status in “vino” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “xorg-server” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “vino” package in Fedora: New Bug description: Binary package hint: compiz When using the nvidia-restricted or some ATI drivers and compiz desktop effects the vnc server will not refresh the screen. This is being caused by the xserver not getting damaged by the nvidia-restricted drivers. Linked bugs confirm this is not an issue on intel chipsets or nv driver. Steps to reproduce: Enable desktop-effects (default) with nvidia-restricted, virtualBox's display or some ATI driver like RV610 Enable remote desktop Connect with VNC Results: You see a screen snapshot of your desktop but if you click a menu item there are no updates to the screen. Notes: If you close and restart the vnc session, you get an updated snapshot but still no refreshes. Workarounds: Use the -noxdamage argument with vncviewer. This is really inefficient and bandwidth hungry since the whole screen refreshes. Kill compiz and use a different wm (metacity). This bug has been confirmed by many others with linked reports. Might be an issue with xorg since there is a report of ATI drivers with similar issues in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328559 . To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/vino/+bug/353126/+subscribe -- Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx driver using X.org prior to release 7.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 353126] Re: Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx driver using X.org prior to release 7.5
The problem is still here Lucid - Lucid. The only way it works is if all screen enhancements, i.e. Compiz is turned off. No refresh happens if any of the special Compiz features are deployed. With all turned off then screen refreshes to the initiating machine. On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:29 PM, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote: Are you still having this issue with Beta2? Does the target machine have /desktop/gnome/remote_access/disable_xdamage checked? I have no issues going from lucid Beta2 to lucid Beta2 without that option checked, but had issues going to a karmic machine without it checked. Once checked on the karmic machine(s) I have no further issues using remote access. -- Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx driver using X.org prior to release 7.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353126 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in GNOME Remote Desktop: Incomplete Status in X.Org X server: Confirmed Status in “vino” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “xorg-server” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in “vino” package in Fedora: New Bug description: Binary package hint: compiz When using the nvidia-restricted or some ATI drivers and compiz desktop effects the vnc server will not refresh the screen. This is being caused by the xserver not getting damaged by the nvidia-restricted drivers. Linked bugs confirm this is not an issue on intel chipsets or nv driver. Steps to reproduce: Enable desktop-effects (default) with nvidia-restricted, virtualBox's display or some ATI driver like RV610 Enable remote desktop Connect with VNC Results: You see a screen snapshot of your desktop but if you click a menu item there are no updates to the screen. Notes: If you close and restart the vnc session, you get an updated snapshot but still no refreshes. Workarounds: Use the -noxdamage argument with vncviewer. This is really inefficient and bandwidth hungry since the whole screen refreshes. Kill compiz and use a different wm (metacity). This bug has been confirmed by many others with linked reports. Might be an issue with xorg since there is a report of ATI drivers with similar issues in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328559 . To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/vino/+bug/353126/+subscribe -- Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx driver using X.org prior to release 7.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 521955] [NEW] second user ends up with white rectangle on desktop that can not be removed without logging off.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.5 Description:Ubuntu 9.10 Release:9.10 How to reproduce. 1) create a second user 2) Use switch user to login to that session and login which typically comes up on the CTRL-ALT-F9 key 3) Switch back via CTRL-ALT-F7 to first user instance. You will need to enter your password again 4) Insert any device. I used a USB stick. Wait for gnome to recognize the device 5) Switch back to CTRL-ALT-F9 second user instance and notice the white blank rectangle on the screen. No ability to close that white screen, minimize it or maximize. It seems impossible to get rid of without logging off the user. 6) Go back to CTRL-ALT-F7 and right click on the device to safely remove and close windows associated with it 7) Go back to CTRL-ALT-F9 and notice that white screen is still present (Note: my wife uses the alternate session and is annoyed by her desktop showing this white rectangle. Please see screen shot. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Feb 14 16:13:09 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: firefox-3.5 3.5.7+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.10.1 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-19.56-generic SourcePackage: firefox-3.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-19-generic i686 ** Affects: firefox-3.5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- second user ends up with white rectangle on desktop that can not be removed without logging off. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521955 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 521955] Re: second user ends up with white rectangle on desktop that can not be removed without logging off.
** Attachment added: white-rectangle.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39200530/white-rectangle.png ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39200531/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39200532/XsessionErrors.txt ** Attachment added: profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39200533/profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt ** Attachment added: profiles.ini.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39200534/profiles.ini.txt -- second user ends up with white rectangle on desktop that can not be removed without logging off. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521955 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 521955] Re: second user ends up with white rectangle on desktop that can not be removed without logging off.
I just learned that if I kill nautilus the white triangle disappears. -- second user ends up with white rectangle on desktop that can not be removed without logging off. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521955 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 514997] [NEW] Dell E153Fpf 15 monitor not supported for native resolution
Public bug reported: I am on Ubuntu 9.10. This is a feature request. I am using a Dell E153FPf 15 lcd monitor and it is not being recognized, so it defaults to a very low resolution compared to the native resolution. 640 X 480 and 800 X 600. The native resolution is 1024 X 768 @ 60 Hz. I was able to get it working at that resolution with the xrandr utility but that was painful learning it and an upgrade is likely to require the time to do it again. Here are the lines I used along with the specifications for the monitor that I am hopeful will allow you to incorporate support in a subsequent release. gtf 1024 768 60 (returns) modeline 1024x768_60.00 64.11 1024 1080 1184 1344 768 769 772 796 -Hsync +Vsync crt 1024 768 60 returns a slighly different set of numbers. I used the above though. But here is the results of that one: modeline 1024x768_60.00 63.50 1024 1072 1176 1328 768 771 775 796 -hsync +vsync The follow was taken from: http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/monitors/E153FPTc/English/about.htm#Specifications Resolution Horizontal scan range 30 kHz to 63 kHz (automatic) Vertical scan range 56 Hz to 76 Hz (automatic) Optimal preset resolution 1024 x 768 at 60 Hz Highest preset resolution 1024 x 768 at 75 Hz Dell guarantees image size and centering for all preset modes listed in the following table. Preset Display Modes Display Mode Horizontal Frequency (kHz) Vertical Frequency (Hz) Pixel Clock(MHz) VGA 640 x 480 31.5 60.0 25.18 VESA 640 x 48037.5 75.0 31.5 VESA 800 x 60037.9 60.3 40.0 VESA 800 x 60046.9 75.0 49.5 VESA 1024 x 768 48.4 60.0 65.0 VESA 1024 x 768 60.0 75.0 78.8 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Dell E153Fpf 15 monitor not supported for native resolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514997 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 514997] Re: Dell E153Fpf 15 monitor not supported for native resolution
** Attachment added: As request. I ran it multiple times but I don't see any ID http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38572640/xrandr_output.txt -- Dell E153Fpf 15 monitor not supported for native resolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514997 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 514997] Re: Dell E153Fpf 15 monitor not supported for native resolution
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1024 x 768, maximum 2048 x 2048 VGA1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (0xec) normal (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 0mm x 0mm Identifier: 0x3a Timestamp: 41719 Subpixel: unknown Clones: CRTC: 0 CRTCs: 0 Transform: 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 filter: 800x600 (0x3b) 40.0MHz +HSync +VSync h: width 800 start 840 end 968 total 1056 skew0 clock 37.9KHz v: height 600 start 601 end 605 total 628 clock 60.3Hz 640x480 (0x3c) 25.2MHz -HSync -VSync h: width 640 start 656 end 752 total 800 skew0 clock 31.5KHz v: height 480 start 490 end 492 total 525 clock 59.9Hz 1024x768_60.00 (0xec) 64.1MHz -HSync +VSync *current h: width 1024 start 1080 end 1184 total 1344 skew0 clock 47.7KHz v: height 768 start 769 end 772 total 795 clock 60.0Hz ** Attachment added: Ouput from xrandr --verbose now included. Identifier: 0x3a http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38573096/xrandr-verbose.txt -- Dell E153Fpf 15 monitor not supported for native resolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514997 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 477978] Re: AT SPI Registry Wrapper not responding when I try to shut down
Same problem here. I removed both at-spi entries from startup programs without any effects. -- AT SPI Registry Wrapper not responding when I try to shut down https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477978 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 378918] [NEW] SAMSUNG SyncMaster 930B not recognized using Nvidia GeForce 6200
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-nv NVIDIA config doesn't detect my Samsung SyncMaster 930B LCD monitor. It comes up as unknown as a CRT. I am using an NVIDIA GeForce 6200 graphics adapter card. lspci | grep -i nvidia returns: 1:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV44A [GeForce 6200] (rev a1) lspci -n returns: 01:00.0 0300: 10de:0221 (rev a1) I am not 100% sure but I think I remember Ubuntu 8.10 did detect this monitor ok. SUSE 11.0 and 11.1 does detect the monitor. xrandr returns: Screen 0: minimum 320 x 240, current 1024 x 768, maximum 1024 x 768 default connected 1024x768+0+0 0mm x 0mm 1024x768 50.0* 800x60051.0 52.0 53.0 680x38454.0 55.0 640x48056.0 576x43257.0 512x38458.0 400x30059.0 60.0 61.0 320x24062.0 Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: xserver-xorg-video-nv 1:2.1.12-1ubuntu5 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersion: Linux version 2.6.28-11-generic (bui...@palmer) (gcc version 4.3.3 (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) ) #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 17 01:57:59 UTC 2009 SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-video-nv Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686 ** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-nv (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- SAMSUNG SyncMaster 930B not recognized using Nvidia GeForce 6200 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 378918] Re: SAMSUNG SyncMaster 930B not recognized using Nvidia GeForce 6200
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27001917/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: LsHal.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27001918/LsHal.txt ** Attachment added: LsMod.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27001919/LsMod.txt ** Attachment added: LsPci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27001920/LsPci.txt ** Attachment added: XorgConf.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27001921/XorgConf.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27001922/XorgLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27001923/XorgLogOld.txt ** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27001924/Xrandr.txt ** Attachment added: glxinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27001925/glxinfo.txt ** Attachment added: setxkbmap.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27001926/setxkbmap.txt ** Attachment added: system.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27001927/system.txt ** Attachment added: xdpyinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27001928/xdpyinfo.txt ** Attachment added: xkbcomp.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27001931/xkbcomp.txt -- SAMSUNG SyncMaster 930B not recognized using Nvidia GeForce 6200 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366535] [NEW] Kubuntu registers itself in /boot/grub/menu.lst as Ubuntu
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub-choose-default I installed Ubuntu first and then Kubuntu as a dual boot on a 160-GB harddrive. All went well. The only problem is that Kubuntu registers itself in /boot/grub/menu.lst as Ubuntu so I have two Ubuntu's and I can't determine which is which without actually booting them. This is trivial I realize since anyone that knows how can edit menu.lst but none the less it makes it confusing. ** Affects: grub-choose-default (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Kubuntu registers itself in /boot/grub/menu.lst as Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366535 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
