[Bug 968974] Re: Some free applications looks like paid applications with price 0.00 and with buy button
still present while downloading free game 'wakfu' through software center in 13.10 - asked to 'buy' and log into ubuntu one all my comments are repeats of and agreements to the above; 'purchase' or 'buy' as a button never ever makes sense gramatically in English for obtaining a free product- there should be an 'install' button which is consistent with the rest of the software catalog. if the software catalog is having issues with free as in beer vs free as in speech, that's a shame, because it should be a bastion and showcase for apps that are free in both regards, as well as showing how free as in beer but closed source apps play well with their FOSS friends and alternatives. instead it seems the software center isn't even designed to showcase free, closed-source apps that should be a simple automated install :( as usual, ubuntu doesn't have enough developers to keep up with 18 month old UX bugs, and the debian core remains usable while the ubuntu user experience looks well intentioned but unmaintained :/ not complaining, just lamenting- I have neither the time nor the experience to contribute more to ubuntu, and I don't expect others to pick up the slack. just making an observation that ubuntu's most polished features tend to appear as if they are perpetual alpha-builds. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968974 Title: Some free applications looks like paid applications with price 0.00 and with buy button To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/968974/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 877150] Re: postfix debconf instructions typo
oh, hm. wishlist you say. because the bug is lower-priority than low, and launchpad doesn't offer an importance less than low? I guess I can put creating and uploading a patch on my todo list. 'do it yourself,' after all... I just thought it would be quite a fast task for a maintainer, though maybe its faster to approve someone else's patch than to update the documentation. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877150 Title: postfix debconf instructions typo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/877150/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 877150] Re: postfix debconf instructions typo
oh, hm. wishlist you say. because the bug is lower-priority than low, and launchpad doesn't offer an importance less than low? I guess I can put creating and uploading a patch on my todo list. 'do it yourself,' after all... I just thought it would be quite a fast task for a maintainer, though maybe its faster to approve someone else's patch than to update the documentation. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877150 Title: postfix debconf instructions typo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/877150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 877150] [NEW] postfix debconf instructions typo
Public bug reported: ubuntu natty, while installing postfix 2.8.5-2~build0.11.04, debconf says: Mail for the 'postmaster', 'root', and other system accounts needs to be redirected to the user account of the actual system administrator. If this value is left empty, such mail will be saved in /var/mail/nobody, which is not recommended. Mail is not delivered to external delivery agents as root. If you already have a /etc/aliases file, then you may need to add this entry. Leave this blank to not add one. -- I believe it should read If you already have a /etc/aliases file, then you may not need to add this entry. ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877150 Title: postfix debconf instructions typo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/877150/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 877150] [NEW] postfix debconf instructions typo
Public bug reported: ubuntu natty, while installing postfix 2.8.5-2~build0.11.04, debconf says: Mail for the 'postmaster', 'root', and other system accounts needs to be redirected to the user account of the actual system administrator. If this value is left empty, such mail will be saved in /var/mail/nobody, which is not recommended. Mail is not delivered to external delivery agents as root. If you already have a /etc/aliases file, then you may need to add this entry. Leave this blank to not add one. -- I believe it should read If you already have a /etc/aliases file, then you may not need to add this entry. ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877150 Title: postfix debconf instructions typo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/877150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 677090] Re: Please consider adding a pam profile for pam_mkhomedir
integration with pam-auth-update would be great, but privilege separation in sshd turned on by default in ubuntu would cause this to fail. I'm open to suggestions - I'm about to turn privilege separation off because I can't find a better, simple home directory creation solution, and I'd rather try to keep sshd up to date and on a non- standard port than create a separate user with root privileges for ldap- account-manager, or any of the other solutions Ive found to auto-create home directories when adding users to an ldap-auth'd system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677090 Title: Please consider adding a pam profile for pam_mkhomedir To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/677090/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 214269] Re: Nick changing in jabber chatrooms behaves weirdly
can the other reporters of this bug verify if they are either using a google talk account (whoe...@gmail.com or a google apps account) when this bug appears, or are you using an account on any other jabber server? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214269 Title: Nick changing in jabber chatrooms behaves weirdly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+bug/214269/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 871212] [NEW] keys are not automatically installed as documentation implies
Public bug reported: this is ubuntu 11.04 debian-archive-keyring version 2010.08.28 /usr/share/doc/debian-archive-keyring/README.gz states: Normally (i.e. if the apt-key binary is found), the keys contained in the debian-archive-keyring package will be automatically installed into apt's trusted keyring by the package's postinst script and keys that are in the debian-archive-keyring-removed will be automatically removed. yet the keys are placed in /usr/share/keyrings/ (not /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/ ), and the postinstall script calls 'apt-key update' which only checks for new keys in /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/ , therfore the keys are never added to the apt-keyring ** Affects: debian-archive-keyring (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871212 Title: keys are not automatically installed as documentation implies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-archive-keyring/+bug/871212/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 868749] [NEW] chromium doesn't recognize that it's the default browser
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 11.04 chromium-browser 13.0.782.215~r97094-0ubuntu0.11.04.1 from natty-proposed set chromium to your default browser using 'preferred applications' chromium still reports not being the default browser when started. ** Affects: chromium-browser Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Bug watch added: code.google.com/p/chromium/issues #45208 http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=45208 ** Also affects: chromium-browser via http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=45208 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868749 Title: chromium doesn't recognize that it's the default browser To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/chromium-browser/+bug/868749/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 868749] Re: chromium doesn't recognize that it's the default browser
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/513133 sorry, it appears this may have something to do with this bug (which is a slightly different behavior but appears to be caused by the same underlying issue), but someone who understands more than I will have to look into it, for it goes over my head. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868749 Title: chromium doesn't recognize that it's the default browser To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/chromium-browser/+bug/868749/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 776393] Re: Can't make Chromium my default web browser
Setting it in Preferred Applications does *not* work for me. Upon opening Preferred Applications again, Firefox is again the default browser. this error appears when running gnome-default-applications-properties, upon setting the default browser to chromium: (gnome-default-applications-properties:28940): default-applications- properties-WARNING **: Error setting default browser: Failed to create file '/home/michael/.local/share/applications/mimeapps.list.GGETVV': Permission denied and for some reason, ~/.local/share/applications and ~/.local/share/applications/mimeapps.list are both owned by root? seems like this may be an unrelated bug... changing ownership of the directory and file seems to solve the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776393 Title: Can't make Chromium my default web browser -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 558784] Re: changing the volume is impossible while muted
If this was a design choice, it's a poor design choice, if you ask me. Consider this use case: audio is being played, and mute is toggled because the audio is painfully loud. the audio source must then be stopped to turn the volume down, otherwise the user is forced to deal with the too-loud volume until the desired volume is reached. If I'm using some sort of remote control to adjust the volume, say an infrared remote, it may not be possible to quickly lower the volume while its un- muted (maybe someone walks in front of me while I'm using the remote and the volume-down action is stopped, causing me to hold the button down again, and causing everyone in the room to deal with the too-loud audio for a few more seconds). Plus, my great-grandmother isn't so great with the mouse, and forcing her to un-mute the audio before changing it effectively means she's going to stop the audio before un-muting so she doesn't have to deal with the too-loud audio while she's changing the volume level. second use case where I can see this being a problem; when audio is automagically muted because a speaker/headphone change has been detected, saving me from possibly having way-too-loud audio coming out of my headphones, I'm forced to stop the audio, un-mute, then change the volume level, rather than just moving the slider and un-checking mute. I think one of the largest uses of the mute toggle is when audio is started and the volume was previously set too high for the new source. I'm certainly used to toggling mute, turning down the volume, and toggling mute again. -- changing the volume is impossible while muted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558784 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103929] Re: Bash prompt string looks for xterm-color, gnome terminal identifies as xterm
So, here's the $64,000 question; is a colored prompt default in Ubuntu when using a color-capable terminal or not? I'm just advocating for some consistency here. It seems odd to see # set a fancy prompt (non-color, unless we know we want color) case $TERM in xterm-color) color_prompt=yes;; esac followed by # uncomment for a colored prompt, if the terminal has the capability; turned # off by default to not distract the user: the focus in a terminal window # should be on the output of commands, not on the prompt #force_color_prompt=yes To me that says 'the default behavior is not to give you a color prompt, unless you're using xterm-color, in which case we're going to give you one, even though the default behavior is never to give you colored prompts in all the other terminals that support color but don't happen to identify themselves as xterm-color.' If we're going to say that colored prompts are not the default in Ubuntu, then I don't see why the chunk of code coloring xterm-color terminal prompts still exists. It's confusing to me to see a colored prompt when I log in from an OSX machine using iTerm, and then to see the color disappear when I launch a screen. Makes the user (makes me, anyway) feel like they must have done something wrong, because they have a colored prompt sometimes and not other times. Having no colored prompts altogether without changing the force_color_prompt variable seems more consistent. I had no colored prompts, I changed the variable, all my prompts are colored. Even though I eventually found the force_color_prompt variable, I don't like making changes to configuration files when I don't understand the rationale behind the code (workarounds = bad ; accepted config changes that will persist throughout updates = good). It also took a little chunk of my morning to figure this all out, and I'm trying to save everyone else the time :) I also agree with those that think color prompts /should/ be the default in any terminal that supports it, considering power users are more likely to have a preference on color vs no color (and can easily change the variable), and considering I agree that a colored prompt does not distract nor take away from the output of a command, but in fact helps the user locate the beginning of the output of the last command. Having a different color for root vs non-root users (red vs green) would also supplement the $ vs # prompt and helps users be wary when they are logged in as root (though I'm thinking this was the behavior in Gentoo and might not happen in Ubuntu since it discourages root logins altogether). Here's hoping the very simple block of script setting a colored prompts for xterm-color terminals can be removed. Simple instructions could be added to https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UsingTheTerminal or https://help.ubuntu.com/community/CommandlineHowto instructing users which variable to edit for colorless (or always colored) prompts. As for making people backport their .bashrc from /etc/skel, you're right, users shouldn't need to do this, and changing the /etc/skel/.bashrc won't affect existing users who have already configured colored prompts for themselves or are happy with the current behavior. Removing the xterm- color checking script from the skel/.bashrc would only affect new users on a system, who, if they had used a *NIX before and noticed their xterm-color terminals weren't giving color prompts, could find the instructions on the wiki (or this bug report or the forum or blog posts or other places it's bound to turn up eventually) and make the simple change to their ~/.bashrc or ~/.profile or wherever the variable should be set (I'm not an expert on shells and logins and environment variables). If a power user is currently sourcing skel/.bashrc from their ~/.bashrc (as someone mentioned above), and we don't make colored prompts the default for all terminals that support them, they will, unfortunately, lose their colored xterm-color prompts, but if they're savvy enough to know how to source skel/.bashrc, they should be able to figure out how to change the force_ variable and restore them. Lastly, I disagree with this being categorized as a Wishlist item rather than a bug, though I try not to be in the habit of changing such things when I'm not the package maintainer. At this point, the Ubuntu colored prompt implementation is inconsistent for no reason apparent to me, and I'm suggesting the behavior be consistent and make sense to a new-to- Ubuntu user; colored prompts are on *or* colored prompts are off, regardless of what someone decides the default should be. -- Bash prompt string looks for xterm-color, gnome terminal identifies as xterm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103929 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446669] Re: E_STRICT: Declaration of AJAXTree::draw_dn() should be compatible with that of PLMTree::draw_dn()
As far as I can tell, the fix for this bug was committed after the 1.1.0.7 branch was released. Upstream has already fixed this in the 1.2 branch. I see that 1.1.0 is still being used in Lucid, so... this bug will persist for the next six months unless someone creates a patch at the debian/ubuntu level? Just hoping this gets in front of someone who can do something about it before lucid is released. -- E_STRICT: Declaration of AJAXTree::draw_dn() should be compatible with that of PLMTree::draw_dn() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446669 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 541970] [NEW] keymap.get_entries_for_keyval returns None when run inside an freenx nxserver
Public bug reported: Description:Ubuntu 9.10 Release:9.10 python-gtk2 2.16.0-0ubuntu1 freenx-server: 0.7.3+teambzr104-0ubuntu1~karmic1 mich...@frigg:~$ python Python 2.6.4 (r264:75706, Dec 7 2009, 18:45:15) [GCC 4.4.1] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import gtk keyXlib: extension Generic Event Extension missing on display :1000.0. Xlib: extension Generic Event Extension missing on display :1000.0. Xlib: extension Generic Event Extension missing on display :1000.0. Xlib: extension Generic Event Extension missing on display :1000.0. Xlib: extension Generic Event Extension missing on display :1000.0. ma keymap = gtk.gdk.keymap_get_default() print gtk.keysyms.Insert, keymap.get_entries_for_keyval(gtk.keysyms.Insert) 65379 None This may be an xlib bug, this may be a freenx bug, this may be a gtk or pygtk bug... This is when running an X session with freenx-server and connecting remotely. If I ssh to the machine, export my display to :0 (even though the machine is in a headless vm) and run the same test, it returns a proper value. I'm filing the bug under pygtk since that's the highest level package I can think of. This is causing gajim (as of the latest development versions) to crash on startup, with the traceback pointing to the keymap.get_entries_for_keyval command. ** Affects: pygtk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- keymap.get_entries_for_keyval returns None when run inside an freenx nxserver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541970 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 541970] Re: keymap.get_entries_for_keyval returns None when run inside an freenx nxserver
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #613331 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613331 ** Also affects: pygtk via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613331 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- keymap.get_entries_for_keyval returns None when run inside an freenx nxserver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541970 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 541970] Re: keymap.get_entries_for_keyval returns None when run inside an freenx nxserver
** Also affects: freenx-server Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: Description: Ubuntu 9.10 Release: 9.10 python-gtk2 2.16.0-0ubuntu1 freenx-server: 0.7.3+teambzr104-0ubuntu1~karmic1 mich...@frigg:~$ python - Python 2.6.4 (r264:75706, Dec 7 2009, 18:45:15) + Python 2.6.4 (r264:75706, Dec 7 2009, 18:45:15) [GCC 4.4.1] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import gtk - keyXlib: extension Generic Event Extension missing on display :1000.0. Xlib: extension Generic Event Extension missing on display :1000.0. Xlib: extension Generic Event Extension missing on display :1000.0. Xlib: extension Generic Event Extension missing on display :1000.0. Xlib: extension Generic Event Extension missing on display :1000.0. - ma keymap = gtk.gdk.keymap_get_default() + Xlib: extension Generic Event Extension missing on display :1000.0. + keymap = gtk.gdk.keymap_get_default() print gtk.keysyms.Insert, keymap.get_entries_for_keyval(gtk.keysyms.Insert) 65379 None - This may be an xlib bug, this may be a freenx bug, this may be a gtk or - pygtk bug... This is when running an X session with freenx-server and - connecting remotely. If I ssh to the machine, export my display to :0 - (even though the machine is in a headless vm) and run the same test, it - returns a proper value. I'm filing the bug under pygtk since that's the - highest level package I can think of. This is causing gajim (as of the - latest development versions) to crash on startup, with the traceback - pointing to the keymap.get_entries_for_keyval command. + This may be an freenx bug, this may be a gtk or pygtk bug... This is + when running an X session with freenx-server and connecting remotely. If + I ssh to the machine, export my display to :0 (even though the machine + is in a headless vm) and run the same test, it returns a proper value. + I'm filing the bug under pygtk since that's the highest level package I + can think of. This is causing gajim (as of the latest development + versions) to crash on startup, with the traceback pointing to the + keymap.get_entries_for_keyval command. + + Those Xlib warnings are because the freenx-server does not support the + XGE extension. -- keymap.get_entries_for_keyval returns None when run inside an freenx nxserver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541970 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 541970] Re: keymap.get_entries_for_keyval returns None when run inside an freenx nxserver
** Also affects: libgtk via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613331 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- keymap.get_entries_for_keyval returns None when run inside an freenx nxserver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541970 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501930] Re: Toshiba Install Failure
34Dell17, try the suggestions you can find @ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingKernelBoot They may help you provide more information about when and/or why the reboot is happening. -- Toshiba Install Failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501930 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446669] Re: E_STRICT: Declaration of AJAXTree::draw_dn() should be compatible with that of PLMTree::draw_dn()
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #542461 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542461 ** Changed in: phpldapadmin (Debian) Importance: Undecided = Unknown ** Changed in: phpldapadmin (Debian) Status: New = Unknown ** Changed in: phpldapadmin (Debian) Remote watch: None = Debian Bug tracker #542461 ** Bug watch added: SourceForge.net Tracker #2809461 http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2809461 ** Also affects: phpldapadmin via http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2809461 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- E_STRICT: Declaration of AJAXTree::draw_dn() should be compatible with that of PLMTree::draw_dn() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446669 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446669] Re: E_STRICT: Declaration of AJAXTree::draw_dn() should be compatible with that of PLMTree::draw_dn()
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic/phpldapadmin -- E_STRICT: Declaration of AJAXTree::draw_dn() should be compatible with that of PLMTree::draw_dn() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446669 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446669] Re: E_STRICT: Declaration of AJAXTree::draw_dn() should be compatible with that of PLMTree::draw_dn()
confirmed still happening in karmic final. this is a show stopper for me, possibly severe or critical importance? this bug renders phpldapadmin nonfunctional with the latest php and phpldapadmin packages in karmic. I'm not sure what the proper procedure is from here; suggest another 1.1.x release from the debian maintainer? create another ubuntu package with the patch applied and submit it as a necessary update to karmic since phpldapadmin is unusable with latest stable package 1.1.0.7-1ubuntu1 ? -- E_STRICT: Declaration of AJAXTree::draw_dn() should be compatible with that of PLMTree::draw_dn() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446669 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 282383] Re: alerts and sound effects can be previewed but pc speaker beep plays on event instead
unfortunately I'm no longer using the machine I was having this problem with, and I haven't noticed this issue with my other ubuntu installs. sorry I can't continue to help debug the issue! -- alerts and sound effects can be previewed but pc speaker beep plays on event instead https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282383 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301174] Re: Use proper sound event instead of system beep
I had sound on a laptop that worked flawlessly (as I experienced) in intrepid, and upon installing jaunty, this behavior appeared. All of the solutions I've seen proposed are not fixes for this bug; blacklisting the pc speaker module, controlling the volume of the pc speaker in a mixer. This bug is the following: I can set an alert sound to be played, I can pick an mp3 or wav in gnome-control-center, and upon triggering the alert sound, all I hear is a beep. I assumed that this is some sort of fall back behavior for when sound isn't installed or configured properly, especially considering, and here's the kicker, that I get absolutely no warning or error message from ubuntu upon trying to select an alert sound. As far as a user is concerned, their audio is working properly (I could still play music from rhythmbox, for example), but for a completely unknown reason, the alert sounds just don't play. There are many duplicates for this bug which propose blacklisting the pc speaker or other such 'workarounds' or 'fixes' for this bug, none of which explain or address why my audio works in some applications, but some part of my system fails to play the alert sound. If someone wants to point me to the bug where this issue is actually being addressed, maybe I'm in the wrong place. Every duplicate I can find, linked to this bug or not, all has the same 'resolution' listed, involving the pc speaker mixer or blacklisting the module completely, and to me, that is not a resolution for this issue. I've been attempting to coral all the users who are experiencing this issue to the same bug report, so that the developers can pin down why this happens, or at the very least explain that it's a fallback behavior, and that it can be caused by any number of issues with the user's installation, which have to be addressed one by one. Right now we have a default install of the ubuntu OS that leads users to believe that their audio is working, but gives them no indication or error message as to why it wont play their selected shutdown or alert sounds (among others?). To me that sounds like a bug. As I said before, I'm not even sure this bug has been assigned to the proper packages or projects. To me it seems highly unlikely that metacity and compiz suffer from the same exact issue and have the same exact fall back procedure. I haven't seen a single definitive response from anyone, developer or not, that explains when and why ubuntu chooses to play a beep instead of the alert sound defined in gnome-control-panel. -- Use proper sound event instead of system beep https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 77010] Re: Overuse of system beep without volume control
Please see comment 26 on bug 301174, Use proper sound event instead of system beep. I don't think the issue here is the fact that users can't or don't readily know how to address the loud system beep that plays, I think the issue is that audio works for the user in other applications, but that the default alert sound selected in gnome-control-panel isn't played, with no reason given to the user, or any indication given to them that something is awry. Blacklisting the pc speaker module or adjusting the volume of the speaker sounds in your mixer are just work arounds, not fixes, and as far as blacklist.conf: Blacklist pcspkr. It produces an ugly and loud noise, getting on everyone's nerves. If still needed at all, this should be done by a nice pulseaudio bing. (LP: #77010) goes, if we can play a nice pulse audio bing, why can't we play the default alert sound selected by the user? To me this sounds like an issue with something underlying in the wm or audio subsystem, considering it appears in both compiz and metacity, in multiple applications (like firefox, gnome-terminal, and even the gtk+ demo application). I'd love to hear from a developer (you know, then they get to it, not to sound antsy or anything :) ) about what causes the system beep to play instead of the selected alert sound, why the user isn't notified that the system couldn't play the selected alert sound, or even just that this is a fallback behavior from any number of issues that couldn't possibly all be resolved in one bug report. That way the individuals having this issue could give feedback and logs to the developers, and we could squash the or all of the bugs that are causing this to happen in the first place. I guess I just don't see 'make the pc speaker stop making noise' as a resolution for 'when I choose an alert sound in gnome-control-panel, a beep plays instead,' because it sounds like a workaround to me. I'm not complaining! work arounds are good, but in all the bug reports mentioning the system beep playiing instead of the alert sound, not one I've seen has addressed /why/ this is happening or how to get alert sounds to play. I'm also just another human like you, so if I've missed such an explanation or resolution, feel free to point it out to me and ill try to say thank you around the foot in my mouth :) -- Overuse of system beep without volume control https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301174] Re: Use proper sound event instead of system beep
Wishlist? No, I think we've lost sight of what issue this bug refers to. I'm not terribly sure it's been assigned to the correct packages, either. In multiple applications, in both metacity and compiz, the computer acts as old computers did when you had no sound card; there are no nifty wav (mp3, ogg, whatever) sounds played, the computer only plays a beep. I'm not sure where the problem lies. We've had confirmation that this happens in transmission, firefox, gnome-terminal and in the GTK+ demo application as well. No one (that I've seen) has confirmed this bug in KDE or any other desktop environment (xfce, openbox etc) than gnome. I find it hard to believe that this is an identical bug in metacity /and/ compiz- it seems more like a setting or library both of them draw upon, like pulseaudio or alsa or the audio system somehow- maybe something gnome related. Regardless (it may be a bug in both compiz and metacity for all I know) this is certainly not a wishlist it is a bug, and a reproducible one at that. A file is set as the default alert sound in the gnome control center sound panel, yet that sound doesn't play, and neither does the selected shutdown sound. I'm not sure why this was changed to a wishlist item. I'm going to give appropriate parties from compiz and metacity (who should be subscribed to this bug) a few days to correctly triage this bug before I set it to confirmed in both compiz and metacity, with importance low (since I'm not one to define priority for other developers). From what I understand of bug triaging, wishlist is for adding non-critical features, not for categorizing when a program fails to act as advertised. For those looking to turn down the volume of or disable the beep altogether, browse the comments of the duplicates of this bug - that has been addressed elsewhere. You can usually find a mixer slider for your speaker sounds and turn that down or mute it completely. The fact that the beep is too loud by default is a completely different bug which has been filed elsewhere, please excuse me for not remembering exactly where or finding it for you right now. I'm just hoping this bug report gets in front of the right people, which I don't think it has yet. -- Use proper sound event instead of system beep https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 280625] Re: Applications use the PC speaker beep for alerts altough a sound file is set up in sound settings
@Jouni Mettala can you explain (briefly is okay) how this was fixed in gnome-terminal, or are you a user and you noticed this bug no longer exists? I ask because of bug #301174 where it was concluded that the issue did not lie in any individual package but in something underlying like pulseaudio, alsa, compiz, metacity etc. If this issue no longer exists in gnome-terminal, its possible it no longer exists in other applications, like transmission and firefox, and that the gtk+ demo properly plays the alert sound as well. -- Applications use the PC speaker beep for alerts altough a sound file is set up in sound settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280625 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351759] Re: save your tabs don't work during an update
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 309656 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309656 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 351253 Firefox (update) lost my open tabs ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 309656 Firefox does not restore session after update -- save your tabs don't work during an update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351759 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351253] Re: Firefox (update) lost my open tabs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 309656 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309656 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 309656 Firefox does not restore session after update -- Firefox (update) lost my open tabs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351253 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 309656] Re: Firefox does not restore session after update
fafhrd: If you're having trouble with firefox not restoring your session after installing an extension manually, you should file a bug with the mozilla bug tracker, or with the extension itself. This bug is about the ubuntu update manager updating firefox and not restoring the user's session. ** Package changed: firefox (Ubuntu) = firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) -- Firefox does not restore session after update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351253] Re: Firefox (update) lost my open tabs
sorry, davide. I only marked the bug you reported as the duplicate because it was filed after this one. I haven't been able to find this bug on the debian bug tracker, but I don't know anything about the differences between the update process for firefox in debian and ubuntu. if manually downloading firefox and updating through firefox doesn't yield the same behavior, then it seems to be an issue with the way ubuntu updates firefox. -- Firefox (update) lost my open tabs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351253 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351759] Re: save your tabs don't work during an update
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 351253 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351253 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 351253 Firefox (update) lost my open tabs -- save your tabs don't work during an update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351759 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351253] Re: Firefox (update) lost my open tabs
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Firefox (update) lost my open tabs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351253 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351253] Re: Firefox (update) lost my open tabs
This bug is present in Ubuntu 9.04 with 3.0.13+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 on Linux 2.6.28-15-generic #48-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 29 08:54:56 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux and has been confirmed in previous versions in the duplicate bug. I'm currently searching the mozilla bugzilla to see if this is an ubuntu- specific issue. -- Firefox (update) lost my open tabs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351253 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 150877] Re: Can't extract to non-local directories
sorry, Sebastien, I read through the comments hastily and didn't notice where it had been marked as fixed. filing a new bug now. -- Can't extract to non-local directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150877 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350396] [NEW] drag-drop extracting a file to nautilus sftp window fails mostly silently
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: file-roller In jaunty drag-dropping from file roller 2.26.0 to nautilus 2.26.0. Fails silently in the GUI. console yields: (file-roller:31737): GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: g_file_new_for_uri: assertion `uri != NULL' failed file-roller: Installed: 2.26.0-0ubuntu2 nautilus: Installed: 1:2.26.0-0ubuntu4 $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu jaunty (development branch) Release:9.04 ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- drag-drop extracting a file to nautilus sftp window fails mostly silently https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350396 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350396] Re: drag-drop extracting a file to nautilus sftp window fails mostly silently
I'm sorry, I was copy/pasting. that's drag-dropping from file-roller to a nautilus window with an sftp:// location open drag-dropping the file from the local filesystem to the sftp:// window works. drag-dropping from the same archive to the local file system works. -- drag-drop extracting a file to nautilus sftp window fails mostly silently https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350396 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Brian J. Murrell br...@interlinx.bc.ca wrote: I just fail to see how unsolicited application pop-ups that cover a major portion of my screen real-estate is good UI design. It's not good design. I don't think the Canonical team is even suggesting it's good design. That's what I don't understand. I've been watching this conversation for a while, and now that I saw Mark make his comment, what I feared is true. Some things we all agree on (maybe?): The notification area shouldn't be a place to display open tasks; that's for a window list applet. If your task doesn't need to notify the user of new events, or a change in status, then it has no place putting an icon in the notification area. Tasks with frequently changing status that don't have panel applets like to put icons into the notification area. I'm looking at Gajim right now in my notification area. The application has a setting which allows me to have the icon appear at all times, or only to appear when there are events I haven't given attention. The latter is, what I can tell, the intended purpose of the notification area. A quick glance shows me if there are any new messages since the last time I checked. No envelope? Back to ignoring it. (Usually sounds do the trick, but they aren't working for me right now :) Now here's where the developers are starting to change things: Bubbles as they used to be called, or as I used to know them as anyway, were little, tiny border- and decoration-less windows that popped up near the notification area (or in an area of our choosing). These bubbles were to give more information about an event that needed attention or a change in status than a simple icon change or animation. These bubbles became actionable (click on me to address the event, or ignore me to address it in your own time, and I'll go away in a few seconds). These bubbles became numerous and there was (still is) no standard for their content or the actions performed when clicking (or right clicking) on the bubble or the icon itself. There was talk that the lack of standards led to security issues. Click here to address this issue was construed by some as click on this bubble, instead of the icon it was supposed to draw attention to. When clicking on the bubble did nothing, some blamed the idea of having bubbles at all as being too confusing because of the lack of standards, rather than addressing the poor UI of that particular bubble. Couldn't we have made clicking on the bubble and the icon do the same thing? Some people see the lack of a specific, coherent standard of content and click behavior as freedom put in the developers hands for how they want their user to interact with their programs and vice-versa. I'm guessing that 'some' definitely includes individual application developers more than developers of the desktop itself. The issue became that notifications were falling by the wayside, that some bubbles were more critical than others, but since there was (is) no standard, people weren't giving critical notifications their due. I certainly see where the developers of the desktop as a whole are coming from here. Bubbles were non-standard, notifications were being missed, and now some developers are starting to use their own bubbles, bypassing libnotify altogether (think quod libet and a few other audio players with their own song change notification OSD). Now you've got bubbles over bubbles, bubbles that don't look like other bubbles, and no consistent way to manage all of your bubbles, what events trigger a bubble, what clicking on a bubble does-- you get the idea. All because someone wanted to give more information that a simple icon in a notification area could give without being clicked or hovered. And all these bubbles caused people to wait for a bubble, because if an icon appears without a bubble, the icon must not be that important. I think the issue the 'community' represented here is trying to express is that the chosen answer to this 'swamp' of icons and bubbles was to revert to what the bubbles were trying to avoid in the first place; bordered, decorated windows that appear in window-switcher lists, window list applets and other places where non-actionable notifications shouldn't be. We've all gotten used to these handy bubbles, and in many places, information wasn't presented to the user in detail before these bubbles came along; we all dealt with new icons appearing in the notification area. And all of us hate pop up windows. Let's face it; popping up update-manager is *not* the same as notifying me that updates are available. That's like saying opening my feed reader is the same as notifying me that one of my feeds has updated, or popping up my mail client in the background is the same as notifying me that I have new email. This point has been made a few times, actually. I personally think the issue should be to create a standard for icons in the notification area. We have
[Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information
Ted Gould wrote: Hopefully from the installer experience on you start to realize that we want it to just work for everyone on the planet, not just the elite who enjoy tweaking their computers. If you'd like to see what we think about market share, I'd recommend Bug 1. :) fair enough. and I was aware of Bug 1 before I wrote my tirade, so I should have known better. I'm constantly frustrated by those who don't want to put in *any* effort - there are definitely people in between them and a computer engineering student who codes for a living and loves filing bug reports - and I'm not against simplifying processes and unifying. I agree that it'd be nice if there was a framework that applications could feed into and leave rendering to the desktop; the notification system comes to mind. I also admit to not knowing much about the notification area backend. I'm a fan of customization, and I've seen where efforts to standardize something ends up completely sacrificing options to customize. It's also that... there's just those few things that shouldn't just work, and I worry that implying that Ubuntu security is something that takes care of itself without you having to know *anything* about it creates a false sense of security. I think you should be able to draw a line at a point where you expect the user to learn something about the operating system and how it works. Oh, and I certainly wasn't advocating every application have their own icon. If a program is running on another workspace or in the background and doesn't need to notify me of state updates or new events, it shouldn't take up any precious space on my desktop at all, in a panel or not. Is the indicator-applet cross-desktop (gnome, kde, xfce, etc)? I've asked a few questions on the indicator-applet launchpad to no avail. Maybe the update-notifier/manager should be the first application to appear in the indicator-applet? :) -- [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 150877] Re: Can't extract to non-local directories
I can reproduce this bug in jaunty dropping from file roller 2.26.0 to nautilus 2.26.0. console yields: (file-roller:31737): GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: g_file_new_for_uri: assertion `uri != NULL' failed file-roller 2.26.0-0ubuntu2 nautilus1:2.26.0-0ubuntu4 -- Can't extract to non-local directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150877 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 282383] Re: alerts and sound effects can be previewed but pc speaker beep plays on event instead
as best I can tell, this is the responsible package. from the description of the package: This module enables PulseAudio to publish itself as the default sound server to the X11 root window automatically upon startup. The is also a module to playback a sound file in place of the X11 bell beep. I hope I should assign it to this package and not pulseaudio. If this package isn't the problem, maybe we can track it down from here. ** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = pulseaudio -- alerts and sound effects can be previewed but pc speaker beep plays on event instead https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282383 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 282383] Re: system sounds don't play
I doubt this is a pulseaudio problem. I can play sounds and music through alsa via pulseaudio, and also through pulseaudio directly, and this bug affects me in jaunty. I'm assuming this has something to do with the way gnome is trying to play the alert and system sounds, none of which play when the event occurs. They do all play, however, when the preview icon is clicked in the sound control panel. The login sound plays, but the logout and system beep sounds are beeps out the pc speaker. Disabling the 'play alert sound' option stops the beep out of the pc speaker as well. If this isn't a bug in gnome-desktop, I apologise, but I think it's somewhere in gnome, since I don't seem to be having any other pulseaudio problems, through alsa or not. ** Changed in: gnome-desktop (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: pulseaudio = gnome-desktop -- system sounds don't play https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282383 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 282383] Re: system sounds don't play
I think this may be a dup of 280625, which seems to be the same thing. In any application, terminal, firefox, gajim, the default alert sound is replaced by a pc speaker beep. If someone does figure out where this is coming from, one or the other possibly should be filed as a dup of the other one. -- alerts and sound effects can be previewed but pc speaker beep plays on event instead https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282383 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 282383] Re: alerts and sound effects can be previewed but pc speaker beep plays on event instead
** Summary changed: - system sounds don't play + alerts and sound effects can be previewed but pc speaker beep plays on event instead -- alerts and sound effects can be previewed but pc speaker beep plays on event instead https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282383 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 310551] Re: Timers don't work in Kubuntu Jaunty.
psst, check the bug on the workrave bugzilla. the bug isnt kde or gnome specific, it had to do with an X upgrade, and the bug has already been addressed and a fix coded. note that the bug status even here on launchpad says fix released, implying that one of, if not the next version of workrave to appear in the repository will have the fix applied. I know you were probably just trying to help confirm the bug, but please try to follow the link to the upstream bug tracker and learn all you can about the bug there, too. -- Timers don't work in Kubuntu Jaunty. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310551 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54294] Re: Failed to allocate mem resource #6 ...
I'm receiving the message too, while booting the gutsy alternate install cd, but from the kernel.org bugzilla for this bug: So I would suggest we close this as apparently confused BIOS, but Linux works. ... Greg, could you please consider removing that message, or rephrasing it in some manner so that it is less alarming? ... The message is now gone in 2.6.23. Closing this bug. But I'm not sure how to update the status of this bug to reflect this. It's marked as confirmed for two versions of the linux source, but unless someone packports the change into a patch (?), then there wont be a fix on any linux source version before 2.6.23. Maybe mark them as fix released, and the fix is upgrade your kernel to 2.6.23 to remove the message (when it becomes available) or ignore it as a warning... -- Failed to allocate mem resource #6 ... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 33721] Re: freeciv-client-xaw3d: sound and fonts missing
From stdsounds.soundspec in the stdsounds3.tar/gz file found today on ftp.freeciv.org/freeciv/contrib/sounds/sets [info] artists = \ OpenQuartz - Ali Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [ali]\ OpenQuartz - Frank Condello ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [pox]\ Warzone - Eidos Entertainment (GPL release) [warzone] so the sounds are from OpenQuarts and Warzone, both GPL. -- freeciv-client-xaw3d: sound and fonts missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
