[Bug 1295458] Re: Can't upgrade from 13.04
Suggested solution did not work. ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295458 Title: Can't upgrade from 13.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1295458/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1295458] Re: Can't upgrade from 13.04
I did not have that ppa enabled (and haven't since a prior version of Ubuntu) but I went ahead and re-added it wiat apt-add-repository and then used ppa-purge to remove it again. Then i tried to process the upgrade again and it still failed with the same error. I'm sorry, I am pretty handy with Linux, but I don't know how to troubleshoot this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295458 Title: Can't upgrade from 13.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1295458/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1295458] Re: Can't upgrade from 13.04
Following along the same logic, I id the same for ubuntu-x-swat/x-updates, which actually DID have some packages installed already. Same result, though. Is the best thing to just keep going through PPAs and purging them? I don't have too many, but some of them shouldn't conflict with official packages (like cran). I wish it would say *what* the actual package issue was. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295458 Title: Can't upgrade from 13.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1295458/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1295458] Re: Can't upgrade from 13.04
Bot (I don't expect you to actually respond, so, anyone else, please help me out here): I have followed the instructions given. I didn't have that repo enabled to begin with. If there are remnants of it somewhere, please let me know how I can remove them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295458 Title: Can't upgrade from 13.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1295458/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1295458] Re: Can't upgrade from 13.04
Never mind. Looked at the apt.log, which was filled with garbage, and realized it was some old packages that were the same version as the Ubuntu ones only with git[some other stuff] as the version. Tracked them all down in Synaptic and forced the official versions (a downgrade). Ran d-release-upgrade and now it's working. It really shouldn't be this hard. I think an average user shouldn't have to deal with this, but I guess an average user wouldn't be using xorg PPAs in the first place, so whatever. The good news is that it's working. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295458 Title: Can't upgrade from 13.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1295458/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1295458] Re: Can't upgrade from 13.04
The exact error, which I'm sure you guessed, is: Could not calculate the upgrade An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade. This can be caused by: * Upgrading to a pre-release version of Ubuntu * Running the current pre-release version of Ubuntu * Unofficial software packages not provided by Ubuntu If none of this applies, then please report this bug using the command 'ubuntu-bug ubuntu-release-upgrader-core' in a terminal. Restoring original system state Aborting -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295458 Title: Can't upgrade from 13.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1295458/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1295458] [NEW] Can't upgrade from 13.04
Public bug reported: I've been trying for months and always get the same error that may be caused by using a pre-release or unapproved packages. This is a VERY old install (started at 8.04) so things are a little crazy, but I don't even know how to troubleshoot this issue... ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:0.192.13 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-35.50-generic 3.8.13.13 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-35-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8.5 Architecture: amd64 CrashDB: ubuntu Date: Thu Mar 20 20:49:16 2014 MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2014-03-21 (0 days ago) VarLogDistupgradeTermlog: ** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295458 Title: Can't upgrade from 13.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1295458/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 858775] Re: gnome-keyring-daemon hogs CPU in Oneiric
This happens to me when I load Google-Chrome. Once it loads, it asks me for my password to unlock the keyring, the it's off to the races! It doesn't seem to ever stop using 100% CPU (on my 3.4GHz Pentium D). If I kill it, everything seems fine. I have a fully updated Precise installation. Is this the same issue? Has anyone found a workaround? Solution? Is there anything I can do to help? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858775 Title: gnome-keyring-daemon hogs CPU in Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-keyring/+bug/858775/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874760] Re: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package samba is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed')
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 862129 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129 Simply running apt-get dist-upgrade succeeded in installing the package immediately after the Oneiric upgrade (even before rebooting). Not sure what caused this issue... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874760 Title: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package samba is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed') To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/874760/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 874760] Re: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package samba is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed')
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 862129 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862129 Simply running apt-get dist-upgrade succeeded in installing the package immediately after the Oneiric upgrade (even before rebooting). Not sure what caused this issue... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874760 Title: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package samba is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed') To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/874760/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874994] [NEW] package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade
Public bug reported: Samba simply failed to install during Oneric upgrade. I'll see if it was a corrupted package download by removing it from the cache and trying the upgrade again. All other packages installed without issue. Here is the string suggested for the bug name: package samba 2:3.5.8 ~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package samba is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half- installed') ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.50-generic 2.6.38.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 BothFailedConnect: Yes Date: Sat Oct 15 07:00:51 2011 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: package samba is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed') NmbdLog: SambaServerRegression: Yes SmbConfIncluded: Yes SmbLog: SourcePackage: samba Title: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package samba is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed') UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-10-14 (1 days ago) ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874994 Title: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/874994/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 874994] Re: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874994 Title: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/874994/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 874994] [NEW] package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade
Public bug reported: Samba simply failed to install during Oneric upgrade. I'll see if it was a corrupted package download by removing it from the cache and trying the upgrade again. All other packages installed without issue. Here is the string suggested for the bug name: package samba 2:3.5.8 ~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package samba is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half- installed') ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.50-generic 2.6.38.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 BothFailedConnect: Yes Date: Sat Oct 15 07:00:51 2011 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: package samba is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed') NmbdLog: SambaServerRegression: Yes SmbConfIncluded: Yes SmbLog: SourcePackage: samba Title: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: package samba is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed') UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-10-14 (1 days ago) ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874994 Title: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/874994/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874994] Re: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874994 Title: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/874994/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218308] Re: Rdesktop cousing system freeze when using Cisco VPN client
Crispy: Are you saying that with this option ENABLED you are no longer having issues? I ask because I have had it enabled and disabled alike and, although the lockups may be less frequent, they are still occurring for me, even with it on. Thanks for posting. I was very hopeful for a second that we had a solution... It seems, from this thread, that there are lots of things that work for *some* people, consistently, but nothing that works for me yet. I'm sure that the solution is something involving the least common denominator of all of these. Something network related. I'm definitely not a network guru, so I don't have a lot to offer toward a solution, but if I see a possible solution posted here, I'm bound to try it. Cheers, --mobrien118 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218308 Title: Rdesktop cousing system freeze when using Cisco VPN client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rdesktop/+bug/218308/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 778009] Re: Upgrade to Natty fails due to Python package error
Sorry, I should have requested that this bug be closed. I used dpkg to remove and purge the python package, then apt-get installed ubuntu-desktop which, aside from losing a very few custom settings, worked perfectly. I don't know if that indicates a package corrupted during download, or if, by doing that, I round-about accomplished the same solution you mention in your comment. Either way, since I had to get my production server back up and running, I had to fix it, and there's no way for me to go back and debug now. Thanks for your help. --mobrien -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778009 Title: Upgrade to Natty fails due to Python package error -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 778009] [NEW] Upgrade to Natty fails due to Python package error
Public bug reported: I ran the Natty upgrade on several systems, but, of course, it only fails on my Server (which is running desktop edition 64bit, fyi) During the upgrade, it failed when installing Python which let to roughly 1100 unconfigured packages and an unbootable system. I was able to chroot into the envrionment from the livecd (mounting my separate home partition and binding /proc/ and run dpkg --configure Python which yielded: Setting up python (2.7.1-0ubuntu5) ... Linking and byte-compiling packages for runtime python2.7... file does not exist: /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/aotcompile.py file does not exist: /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/classfile.py Errors were ignored. running python rtupdate hooks for python2.7... file does not exist: /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/aotcompile.py file does not exist: /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/classfile.py pycentral: pycentral updatedefault: error byte-compiling files (3) Please let me know what other information I can provide to help diagnose and fix this bug. ** Affects: python-defaults (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778009 Title: Upgrade to Natty fails due to Python package error -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 752701] Re: ALERT! /dev/disk/by-uuid/xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx does not exist
Is there any chance to get this fixed before release? Is there any more information I can provide? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752701 Title: ALERT! /dev/disk/by-uuid/---- does not exist -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 752701] [NEW] ALERT! /dev/disk/by-uuid/xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx does not exist
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image-virtual I have a *relatively* unaltered install of Ubuntu Desktop running in VirtualBox 4.0.4 and I recently upgraded from a working Maverick to a working Natty beta1. I decided to try the linux-image-virtual kernel, so I installed it, along with the appropriate headers. I proceeded to reboot, hoping to try the new kernel, when I was surprised by this error message and dropped to an initramfs prompt. (Error: in title, but with my real UUID, i checked that it is the correct one) Choosing one of the existing linux-image standard kernels still works, and I even dist-upgraded from .7 to .8 on both the standard and virtual kernels, and still the standard works but the virtual doesn't. Sorry I'm not more help in digging deeper into this, but I'm willing to help get it sorted out. Let me know what additional information I can provide that would be helpful. Thanks! ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: linux-image-virtual 2.6.38.8.22 Regression: No Reproducible: Yes ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.41-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686 AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.23. AplayDevices: List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices card 0: I82801AAICH [Intel 82801AA-ICH], device 0: Intel ICH [Intel 82801AA-ICH] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 Architecture: i386 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: mobrien1326 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'I82801AAICH'/'Intel 82801AA-ICH with STAC9700,83,84 at irq 21' Mixer name : 'SigmaTel STAC9700,83,84' Components : 'AC97a:83847600' Controls : 34 Simple ctrls : 24 Date: Wed Apr 6 12:40:51 2011 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=c537b814-6e35-4cbf-afdd-83244371915f InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) IwConfig: lono wireless extensions. eth0 no wireless extensions. Lsusb: Bus 002 Device 002: ID 80ee:0021 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub MachineType: innotek GmbH VirtualBox ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-8-generic root=UUID=fe6b13eb-3f5f-4938-b746-17cb2e381486 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.38-8-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-2.6.38-8-generic N/A linux-firmware1.49 RfKill: SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-30 (6 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 12/01/2006 dmi.bios.vendor: innotek GmbH dmi.bios.version: VirtualBox dmi.modalias: dmi:bvninnotekGmbH:bvrVirtualBox:bd12/01/2006:svninnotekGmbH:pnVirtualBox:pvr1.2: dmi.product.name: VirtualBox dmi.product.version: 1.2 dmi.sys.vendor: innotek GmbH ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 kernel-config natty needs-upstream-testing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752701 Title: ALERT! /dev/disk/by-uuid/---- does not exist -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 752701] Re: ALERT! /dev/disk/by-uuid/xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx does not exist
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752701 Title: ALERT! /dev/disk/by-uuid/---- does not exist -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 405533] Re: HAL Fails: (EE) config/hal: couldn't initialise context: (null) ((null))
This issue was fixed. It had something to do with the fact that I have a RAID 1 array with a MBR on it (because I treat the raw array as a raw drive for a VirtualBox VM I'm running on the machine). In the next version of Ubuntu immediately following this one, HAL was able to deal with this scenario and everything was fine. It even shows up in Disk Manager as a partition with an MBR on it. Very slick. -- HAL Fails: (EE) config/hal: couldn't initialise context: (null) ((null)) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405533 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 405533] Re: HAL Fails: (EE) config/hal: couldn't initialise context: (null) ((null))
Actually, this might have been another bug (I have quite a few Ubuntu systems that I like to mess around with) Either way, they're all working now. Sorry for not keeping on top of the bug report, and thanks for asking about it. Cheers! --mobrien118 -- HAL Fails: (EE) config/hal: couldn't initialise context: (null) ((null)) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405533 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 648806] [NEW] package python-virtkey 0.60.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 648695 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648695 Public bug reported: Doing software update on Maverick beta (3 days before RC release scheduled). This package failed to install. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: python-virtkey 0.60.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Sep 27 07:28:58 2010 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Beta i386 (20100901.1) SourcePackage: virtkey Title: package python-virtkey 0.60.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** Affects: virtkey (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 maverick -- package python-virtkey 0.60.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648806 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 648806] Re: package python-virtkey 0.60.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 648695 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648695 ** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648806/+attachment/1643219/+files/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648806/+attachment/1643220/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648806/+attachment/1643221/+files/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648806/+attachment/1643222/+files/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648806/+attachment/1643223/+files/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package python-virtkey 0.60.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648806 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 571564] [NEW] 50patchtemplatefordebian hangs forever
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bugzilla3 When I try to install bugzilla3 (3.2.5.1-2) it makes it to the step run-parts: executing /etc/bugzilla3/pre- checksetup.d/50patchtemplatefordebian and then hangs indefinitely. There is a process running called /bin/sh /usr/share/bugzilla3/lib/checksetup.pl /etc/bugzilla3/answerfile.sxjgK74J2t --verbose which keeps spawning the process perl /usr/share/bugzilla3/lib/checksetup_nondebian.pl /etc/bugzilla3/answerfile.sxjgK74J2t --verbose which does and then does it again. Any help with this issue would be apreciated. I will provide further information if needed. ** Affects: bugzilla (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- 50patchtemplatefordebian hangs forever https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571564 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 554921] [NEW] package dbconfig-common 1.8.44 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dbconfig-common During upgrade to lucid... update manager froze, no mouse or kbrd response. had to kill update-manager in ssh terminal and run dpkg --reconfigure -a ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: dbconfig-common 1.8.44 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Apr 3 19:50:36 2010 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: dbconfig-common Title: package dbconfig-common 1.8.44 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** Affects: dbconfig-common (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package lucid -- package dbconfig-common 1.8.44 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554921 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dbconfig-common in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 554921] Re: package dbconfig-common 1.8.44 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43019780/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43019781/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43019782/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43019783/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package dbconfig-common 1.8.44 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554921 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dbconfig-common in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 554921] [NEW] package dbconfig-common 1.8.44 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dbconfig-common During upgrade to lucid... update manager froze, no mouse or kbrd response. had to kill update-manager in ssh terminal and run dpkg --reconfigure -a ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: dbconfig-common 1.8.44 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Apr 3 19:50:36 2010 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: dbconfig-common Title: package dbconfig-common 1.8.44 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** Affects: dbconfig-common (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package lucid -- package dbconfig-common 1.8.44 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554921 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 554921] Re: package dbconfig-common 1.8.44 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43019780/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43019781/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43019782/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43019783/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package dbconfig-common 1.8.44 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554921 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453444] Re: /var/log fills up with all normal messages @ about 575/sec fill up the available space
I was getting these messages filling up my root hard drive very quickly. I discovered that my heat sink was all clogged up with dust and cleaning it fixed the errors, but it shouldn't be doing this anyway. Eventually my heat sink is going to get gunked up again and the only way I'm going to know is when my computer crashes and I take time to dig into the error logs and find that my HD is full of this crap again. Another issue is on 3 out of 5 computers I use don't update the CPU temperature in sensors anyway. 2 of them say that it is 40C all the time, and another stays at 20C. At first, I thought that this may be a fault in the motherboard as the 2 that stay at 40C are both cheap ECS mobos, from relatively the same time period, about 2-3 years ago, but one is an INTEL and the other AMD. The one that's stuck on 20C is another manufacturer, but even older. BUT, since the lernel seemed to know that the chip was overheating, I guess it DID know what the temp was. I wonder if there is some connection between all of these happenings. Good luck! -- /var/log fills up with all normal messages @ about 575/sec fill up the available space https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453444 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 456040] Re: zope2.11-sandbox is uninstallable due to version dependency on zope-common
I have the same problem when trying to install plone3-site. Work through the unmet dependencies only to find that zope-common 0.5.49 is required but only 0.5.46ubuntu1 is available in the repos. I'm actually just trying to install zope2.10 with mine and it still has this unmet dep. ** Package changed: zope2.11 (Ubuntu) = zope2.10 (Ubuntu) -- zope2.11-sandbox is uninstallable due to version dependency on zope-common https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456040 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 456040] Re: zope2.11-sandbox is uninstallable due to version dependency on zope-common
I changed the affected package to zope2.10 since it is likely to gain more exposure (maybe?) and it is more relevant since it is the default zope in karmic. This seems like a no brainer. The maintainer for zope needs to update the version of zope-common in the repos or change the dependency. Thanks! -- zope2.11-sandbox is uninstallable due to version dependency on zope-common https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456040 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178038] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
I had this bug, but downloaded the *BETA* 64bit Flash Player for Linux and replaced the link to the 32bit wrapped one in Mozilla's plugin directory, and now the error is gone. I *didn't* remove the flash player package, though. I wonder why Ubuntu didn't use the 64bit flash plugin for this release. It seems more stable than the hack they use to wrap the 32bit plugin, if I may say so. Just my thoughts, hope this helps! -- npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 447320] [NEW] kernel 2.6.31-12-generic renders Error 13: Invalid or unsupported executable format
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub I'm not sure if this is a grub error, kernel error or ext4 error. I recently ran apt-get upgrade on karmic and ended up with the grub error Error 13: Invalid or unsupported executable format after installing kernel 2.6.31-12-generic. If I select 2.6.31-11-generic (the previous kernel) it works without a problem. Right before I ran this upgrade, I upgraded the hard disk to ext4 using the procedure linked to from the Karmic beta information page. The system was a fully patched (up to 10/7/09 package lists) system. So, to reproduce, one should be able to: 1. Change /etc/fstab to ext4 for main HD. 2. Use tune2fs (not sure correct command name) to upgrade the FS to ext4 and use fsck to repair it. 3. Install 2.6.31-12-generic kernel packages. 4. Try to boot into 2.6.31-12-generic kernel. Also, I installed grub2 in chain-loading mode. The same error results when GRUB2 is used to boot the same kernel, as well as using GRUB1.5 to select the kernel. Hope this information helps squash this bug! ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Oct 9 10:17:22 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: grub (not installed) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-11.38-generic SourcePackage: grub Uname: Linux 2.6.31-11-generic i686 XsessionErrors: (gnome-settings-daemon:1761): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-settings-daemon:1761): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (nautilus:1796): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1816): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (gnome-panel:1784): Gdk-WARNING **: /build/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.18.2/gdk/x11/gdkdrawable-x11.c:952 drawable is not a pixmap or window ** Affects: grub (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- kernel 2.6.31-12-generic renders Error 13: Invalid or unsupported executable format https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 405533] Re: HAL Fails: (EE) config/hal: couldn't initialise context: (null) ((null))
Thanks Timo. I'm anxious to figure this one out, since my fresh install of a system has been unusable 90% of the time since I installed Ubuntu on it. Please, HAL guys,let me know what I need to do next. --mobrien118 -- HAL Fails: (EE) config/hal: couldn't initialise context: (null) ((null)) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405533 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 405533] Re: HAL Fails: (EE) config/hal: couldn't initialise context: (null) ((null))
error: dbus_bus_get: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.FileNotFound: Failed to connect to socket /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: No such file or directory OK, but this is expected, I believe, because I am running in Drop to root shell with networking right now. When I try to start normally, I can't interact with the system via Keyboard, Mouse or Network, so there would be no way, that i know of, for me to run lshal. Can youthink of any other way for me to get the requisite information? -- HAL Fails: (EE) config/hal: couldn't initialise context: (null) ((null)) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405533 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 405533] Re: HAL Fails: (EE) config/hal: couldn't initialise context: (null) ((null))
Yeah, that'show I logged in when I got this error from a root shell with networking. But when I boot normally, there is no network, so SSH doesn't work. I can't even ping the machine. The desktop appears normally, but with the Failed to load HAL (I think, not sure of the phrasing) error message. Is there anything in any log file that could help? -- HAL Fails: (EE) config/hal: couldn't initialise context: (null) ((null)) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405533 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 405533] [NEW] HAL Fails: (EE) config/hal: couldn't initialise context: (null) ((null))
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg I ran a set of updates a few weeks ago that caused my (remote) ubuntu Jaunty system to not boot up. It was installed off of the alternate CD, with md (RAID) devices enabled. I have had a number of problems with it, getting it oing,initially, and then with HAL failing because it couldn't assemble the RAID devices. More information on that issue can be found in the bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hal/+bug/361689. Well, Now I am getting a HAL failure message on the GUI once Ubuntu boots, but there is no Keyboard/Mouse/Network, so there is no way for me to interact with the system. The only thing I can do is drop to a root shell w/networking at boot. To further complicate the diagnosis, I only have remote access to this machine, so my ability to reboot it is limited to when I can have someone do it for me, drop to a root shell, and then start SSHd. The error in the Xorg log says: (EE) config/hal: couldn't initialise context: (null) ((null)) P.S. I also have a warning in Xorg that says: (WW) The directory /usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic does not exist. Please let me know if I can provide any more information to help diagnose this bug. Thanks! ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 LsHal: NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: xorg 1:7.4~5ubuntu18 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersion: Linux version 2.6.28-13-generic (bui...@vernadsky) (gcc version 4.3.3 (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) ) #45-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 30 19:49:51 UTC 2009 SourcePackage: xorg Uname: Linux 2.6.28-13-generic i686 xkbcomp: ** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- HAL Fails: (EE) config/hal: couldn't initialise context: (null) ((null)) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405533 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 405533] Re: HAL Fails: (EE) config/hal: couldn't initialise context: (null) ((null))
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29586950/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: LsMod.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29586951/LsMod.txt ** Attachment added: LsPci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29586952/LsPci.txt ** Attachment added: XorgConf.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29586953/XorgConf.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29586954/XorgLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29586955/XorgLogOld.txt ** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29586956/Xrandr.txt ** Attachment added: glxinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29586957/glxinfo.txt ** Attachment added: setxkbmap.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29586958/setxkbmap.txt ** Attachment added: system.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29586959/system.txt ** Attachment added: xdpyinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29586960/xdpyinfo.txt -- HAL Fails: (EE) config/hal: couldn't initialise context: (null) ((null)) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405533 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 361689] Re: hald crashed with SIGSEGV in hotplug_event_begin_add_blockdev when assembling mdraid devices
Ahhh! Is this bug back? The server I was having a problem with is 1000 miles away from me now and I rebooted it and it didn't come back up. Thinking back a few hours, I remember that update-manager installed a HAL update. N! I need my server and this is going to force me into weeks of downtime! How is this not a Critical bug, and how did this update cause a regression? This is absolutely horrible. The first time I experienced this bug, it cost me hours/possibly days of troubleshooting, now I have indefinite unscheduled downtime. Seriously CRITICAL! Anyone have any suggestions? -- hald crashed with SIGSEGV in hotplug_event_begin_add_blockdev when assembling mdraid devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361689 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 361689] Re: hald crashed with SIGSEGV in hotplug_event_begin_add_blockdev when assembling mdraid devices
Didn't mean to sound upset at anyone in my previous post. I know that Chris did an awesome job with the first patch. I'm just upset and looking for a support group :-) The sooner we can get a permanent fix for this issue, the sooner I can get a good night's sleep. Please, anyone who is capable, help out with this! Also, can we change the status back to confirmed or incomplete so it will bubble back up and get noticed? -- hald crashed with SIGSEGV in hotplug_event_begin_add_blockdev when assembling mdraid devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361689 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202952] Re: Add native ZFS to Ubuntu
I got a taste of ZFS with Solaris and PC-BSD, and I must say, I can't get that taste out of my mouth! While I found PC-BSD, as a whole, to be relatively immature as a usable desktop OS (a great effort, though, not quite there yet), and OpenSolaris to be the same, only with surprising less ZFS capability using the native installer, the BEST thing about using both of these OSes was getting to try out ZFS. It is AWESOME! But, I guess htat's why this bug exists. So, I guess there are a few options, all of which will take a lot of time and effort. 1. Somehow make GPL and CDDL work together (not likely). 2. Create your own implementation of ZFS written under the GPLvX...This may have legal ramifications of its own, since maybe this would violate patents in the ZFS specification? 3. Create a similar, competing FS that can do all, most, or more of the COOL things ZFS can, but designed and created under a GPL friendly license. From what I remember, there are some file systems currently in development or some level of release that have goals similar to ZFS, but without corporate support (like Sun backing ZFS). I doubt they will ever be ready before something better exists (maybe options 1 or 2). I could be wrong, though. So, it looks like a pretty not so good for this happening, but I support this bug(/feature) request, and I admire its similarity to bug #1 (If you don't know what that is, please look it up!) Also, what about the license compatibility of having NTFS drivers running on the linux kernel? Surely, if that can be accomplished, they can make a driver fore ZFS. And the point about NVidia drivers, surely their license is more restrictive than the CDDL. Just my thoughts in support of solving this bug ;-) Cheers, --mobrien118 -- Add native ZFS to Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 361689] Re: hald segfault when using a raid volume
I think I can get you started. I mean, the first step to creating a RAID volume is to think it out. Where do you need redundancy? Where do you need speed? Then map out your partitions (especially if you have different sized disks). Remember that RAID will cause a slight (in the case of RAID0 or RAID1) to slightly greater (RAID5 or RAID6) processor and I/O load. That is the trade-off for getting better overall disk performance. Although it is supposedly not needed to RAID0 your swap partitions across disks (supposedly the swap daemon manages multiple disks very well) it doesn't hurt to do so and is an easy and safe way to get started with RAID. You might consider making this your test case. This page lays out mdadm and Linux RAID pretty well: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=408461 Basically: 1. format disks you want to use as RAID partitions 2. create a RAID array using mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=[level] --raid-devices=[number of devices] [device1] [device2]...[deviceN] 3. assemble the array 4. format the array in the filesystem of your choice (like any other partition) 5. mount it like you would any other disk partition Pretty simple, eh? -- hald segfault when using a raid volume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361689 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 361689] Re: hald segfault when using a raid volume
To the main Ubuntu repos or to your PPA? -- hald segfault when using a raid volume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361689 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 361689] Re: hald segfault when using a raid volume
How is it possible that this bug is only listed as Medium importance?!?!? I discovered what I think is this bug when I upgraded my system using system update. Upon a later reboot I found that I had no access to the system whatsoever. After trying multiple things to get back in from the root recovery console, I re-formatted, losing a lot of configuration. Fortunately, I am somewhat tech savvy and I didn't lose everything, but this cost me 2 days and will probably cost more. And for the average user, this could equate to complete data loss. I would think this would be a high importance bug since it disables a working system! Does anyone agree with me, or am I missing something here? --mobrien118 -- hald segfault when using a raid volume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361689 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 361689] Re: hald segfault when using a raid volume
FYI, it looks like Chris's PPA packages fixed it, though. Thank goodness! If I had been remote from this machine (which I will be for the next few months) it would have been a nightmare! -- hald segfault when using a raid volume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361689 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 353117] Re: package ubuntu-docs 9.04.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
I see that the status is changed to Fix Released but I am not getting it from the repos. This is probably due to my ignorance on the meanings of the status choices, but I would assume that Released means that it is in the repos, while Fix Committed would mean that it is ready to be added and will be included in a batch update or something. Sorry if this isn't the place to ask such questions, but I couldn't (easily) find information/definitions of the status choices. I guess the question I should be asking is: When will the status be (I know it's not an option) Fix Available? -- package ubuntu-docs 9.04.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353117 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 353117] Re: package ubuntu-docs 9.04.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Matthew, Thanks for helping me understand the release process. I really appreciate it! -- package ubuntu-docs 9.04.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353117 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 324941] [NEW] package linux-image-2.6.27-11-generic 2.6.27-11.27 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image When I asked to use a shell session to evaluate the situation, it soft froze. Finally the shell appeared. I exited the shell and the window that spawned it had frozen. After about 10 minutes, I forced it to close, then the terminal portion of the update manager gave me a prompt! I typed exit into it and the installation of the other packages completed normally. Then I think it can the configure routine for the kernel packages and dependency descendants again. This time I started my own shell session. ProblemType: Package Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 LsUsb: Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 003: ID 046d:c01b Logitech, Inc. MX310 Optical Mouse Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0471:2001 Philips Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: linux-image-2.6.27-11-generic 2.6.27-11.27 ProcCmdLine: User Name=UUID=7b0160d4-b0db-4555-b81d-d0aa0019ec03 ro quiet splash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.27-9.19-generic SourcePackage: linux Title: package linux-image-2.6.27-11-generic 2.6.27-11.27 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package linux-image-2.6.27-11-generic 2.6.27-11.27 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324941 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 324941] Re: package linux-image-2.6.27-11-generic 2.6.27-11.27 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21949555/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21949556/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21949557/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21949558/DpkgTerminalLog.txt ** Attachment added: HalComputerInfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21949559/HalComputerInfo.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21949560/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuInfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21949561/ProcCpuInfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21949562/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21949563/ProcModules.txt -- package linux-image-2.6.27-11-generic 2.6.27-11.27 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324941 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 306025] [NEW] package ca-certificates 20080514-0ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ca-certificates When installing the package, it failed. Sorry, I didn't see exactly what happened, as I was running an update with 44 packages I am using a fully patched Intrepid system, x86 arch. The installation of the package failed. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Package: ca-certificates 20080514-0ubuntu1.1 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: ca-certificates Title: package ca-certificates 20080514-0ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.27-9-generic i686 ** Affects: ca-certificates (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package ca-certificates 20080514-0ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306025 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 306025] Re: package ca-certificates 20080514-0ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20284073/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20284074/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package ca-certificates 20080514-0ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306025 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
