[Bug 264848] Re: No .desktop file

2008-09-07 Thread msiebuhr
I've hacked together a .desktop-file, though lots of things are missing.

I could not find any obvious icon to use, so I found the timezone-one,
which shows a map and some pins. Perhaps
http://josm.openstreetmap.de/browser/trunk/images/logo.png could be made
to icon-size?

** Attachment added: "Start .desktop file"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17359901/josm.desktop

-- 
No .desktop file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264848
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 264848] [NEW] No .desktop file

2008-09-04 Thread msiebuhr
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: josm

The JOSM-package need a .desktop-entry, so it can be found by simpler
means than the command line.

** Affects: josm (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
No .desktop file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264848
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 210134] Re: F-spot missing icons

2008-08-28 Thread msiebuhr
** Changed in: f-spot (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
F-spot missing icons
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210134
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 234591] Re: PTmender missing from libpano12-bin

2008-08-05 Thread msiebuhr
I've checked the produced .debs for the versions I could find on LP -
the programs disappeared with the introduction version 2.8.6-0.1
(https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpano12/2.8.6-0.1).

Also, I've found it mentioned on the debian phototools list:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-phototools-
devel/2008-January/34.html

-- 
PTmender missing from libpano12-bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234591
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 227744] Re: dapper upgrade to hardy: openldap silently refuses to start when unable to open SSL certificates - main: TLS init def ctx failed: -64

2008-07-24 Thread msiebuhr
Another small problem with it; the AppArmor profile allows reading from
/etc/ssl/certs/* and /etc/ssl/private/* - but because of this bug, you
have to put the cert elsewhere, forcing one to break the AppArmor
profile.

As a temporary solution, the installer could add /etc/ldap/private/,
owned by openldap:openldap and modify AppArmor to allow slapd to read
from that directory?

-- 
dapper upgrade to hardy: openldap silently refuses to start when unable to open 
SSL certificates - main: TLS init def ctx failed: -64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227744
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 234591] Re: PTmender missing from libpano12-bin

2008-07-21 Thread msiebuhr
Reading the package description, there should be a lot of programs in
the package http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/libpano12-bin . But looking
at the file list,
http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/i386/libpano12-bin/filelist all but to
are missing in action.

While I have only skimmed the source tree, it actually seems like a lot
of the mentioned (AND missing) programs have been removed. I was unable
to find any explanation in the changelog.

-- 
PTmender missing from libpano12-bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234591
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 228299] Re: libvirt-bin with QEMU ignores KQEMU

2008-05-25 Thread msiebuhr
It seems this isn't a bug, but an error on my behalf; I read the
documentation on most homepages and guides for creating new virtual
machines using virt-install implies that the --accelerate flag requires
KVM to work - but reading the man-page, it enables *any* acceleration it
may find, being KVM, KQEMU or none at all. If you leave it out, it
explicitly forces the virtual machine not to use any acceleration at all
(i.e. setting the '-no-kqemu' argument).

** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: kqemu (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
libvirt-bin with QEMU ignores KQEMU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228299
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 67276] Re: pam_unix returns incorrect return value when not run as root

2008-05-22 Thread msiebuhr
I've hit this bug when developing an application validating users using
PAM; even when you make a /etc/pam.d/something file that uses the dummty
"allow everything" module, PAM insists on trying to read /etc/shadow for
some reason. If and when you run the application as root (or as a user
in the "shadow"-group) no such problem exists.

The postgresql-folks seem to have hit this as well:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2003-05/msg00058.php

(I did cook up some minimal files using Python-PAM to illustrate this,
but unfortunately I got a little over-zealous cleaning up my code last
week. No VCS-checkins as well. Æv.)

-- 
pam_unix returns incorrect return value when not run as root
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67276
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 228299] Re: libvirt-bin with QEMU ignores KQEMU

2008-05-10 Thread msiebuhr
It can be hacked by moving /usr/bin/qemu to /usr/bin/qemu-original and
inserting this script as /usr/bin/qemu (remember permissions):

#!/usr/bin/env python
#
# Wrapper for /usr/bin/qemu to forcefully enable kqemu support
#
# Morten Siebuhr
# 

from sys import argv
from os import system, execv
from os.path import exists

original_file = "/usr/bin/qemu-original"

if not exists('/dev/kqemu'):
print "Cannot run kqemu - the device does not exist!"
else:
if '-no-kqemu' in argv:
argv[argv.index('-no-kqemu')] = '-kernel-kqemu'

execv(original_file, argv)

-- 
libvirt-bin with QEMU ignores KQEMU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228299
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 115514] Re: Album cover art cannot be easily changed

2008-05-08 Thread msiebuhr
Fixed in Hardy.

** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
Album cover art cannot be easily changed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115514
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 228299] [NEW] libvirt-bin with QEMU ignores KQEMU

2008-05-08 Thread msiebuhr
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: libvirt-bin

There does not seem to be any way to make libvirtd use kqemu instead of
qemu. When it launches sub-processes, it explicitly adds the argument
"--no-kqemu", with no option for changing this.

>From searching on the internet, it seems libvirtd once supported this,
but RedHat removed the feature as they did not ship KQEMU...

** Affects: kqemu (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: libvirt (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: kqemu (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
libvirt-bin with QEMU ignores KQEMU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228299
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 135067] Re: /dev/kqemu is root-only - there should be a qemu group

2008-05-08 Thread msiebuhr
I use the following in my setup:

/etc/udev/rules.d/60-kqemu.rules
KERNEL=="kqemu", NAME="%k", GROUP="libvirt", MODE="0660"

-- 
/dev/kqemu is root-only - there should be a qemu group
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135067
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 210134] [NEW] F-spot missing icons

2008-04-01 Thread msiebuhr
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: human-icon-theme

F-spot is missing som icons when editing images; se attached screenshot.

Ubuntu:
Description:Ubuntu hardy (development branch)
Release:8.04

F-spot Version: 0.4.2-1ubuntu1

** Affects: f-spot (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: f-spot icons

** Changed in: f-spot (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: human-icon-theme => f-spot

-- 
F-spot missing icons
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210134
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 210134] Re: F-spot missing icons

2008-04-01 Thread msiebuhr
Hm. The screenshot didn't make it... Re-adding it;

** Attachment added: "Screenshot-F-Spot.png"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13014419/Screenshot-F-Spot.png

-- 
F-spot missing icons
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210134
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 210134] Re: F-spot missing icons

2008-04-01 Thread msiebuhr
Hm. The screenshot didn't make it... Re-adding it;

** Attachment added: "Screenshot-F-Spot.png"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13014425/Screenshot-F-Spot.png

-- 
F-spot missing icons
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210134
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 199947] Re: java browser-plugin in firefox 3 doesn't work

2008-03-16 Thread msiebuhr
I can confirm that the above solution work for me as well.

(Though I first tried to copy it to /usr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins/,
which made the Adobe flash work. But to no avail...)

** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: None => sun-java6
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
java browser-plugin in firefox 3 doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199947
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 201487] Re: Firefox uses the wrong DPI

2008-03-12 Thread msiebuhr
I can confirm that setting about:config -> 'layou.css.dpi' to 96 solved
my font-rendering problems in FF (and persist in all other Gecko-
rendering applications I have installed).

xdpyinfo gives me:
screen #0:
  dimensions:1680x1050 pixels (300x230 millimeters)
  resolution:142x116 dots per inch

For the sake of completeness, I assume
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-
intel/+bug/201032 is the root cause. Or?

(And thanks for the workaround, Alexander -- hero of the day!)

** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
Firefox uses the wrong DPI
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201487
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 201056] Re: Firefox font size rendering (Hardy)

2008-03-12 Thread msiebuhr
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 201487 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201487

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 201487
   Firefox uses the wrong DPI

-- 
Firefox font size rendering (Hardy)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201056
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 195422] Re: hardy heron 8.04 alpha 5 - flash not installed correctly

2008-03-12 Thread msiebuhr
It seems I've hit the same bug, though I've hit it on a freshly
installed machine (total reformat).

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-
nonfree/+bug/201209 for another possible solution to the problem (that
respects dpkg-alternatives).

-- 
hardy heron 8.04 alpha 5 - flash not installed correctly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195422
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 201209] Re: Firefox fails to see flashplugin-nonfree (Hardy)

2008-03-12 Thread msiebuhr
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 195422 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195422

It's a i386-machine, and reading the details of your submission, it does
indeed look like a duplicate.

-- 
Firefox fails to see flashplugin-nonfree (Hardy)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201209
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 201209] Re: Firefox fails to see flashplugin-nonfree (Hardy)

2008-03-12 Thread msiebuhr
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 173890 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890

I do not believe this is a duplicate bug -- if the above was caused by
an MD5 mismatch, how would I be able to copy a symlink and make it work?
And APT shows no errors during installation of the package, which the
MD5 bugreport says should happen.

-- 
Firefox fails to see flashplugin-nonfree (Hardy)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201209
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 201209] [NEW] Firefox fails to see flashplugin-nonfree (Hardy)

2008-03-11 Thread msiebuhr
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree

When installing flashplugin-nonfree on a fresh install of Hardy (alpha
6), nothing happens. I.e. when you point the browser to a webpage using
flash, firefox asks you to install the plugin again...

It turns out there are some problems with where Firefox looks for the
.so-file and where flashplugin-nonfree / dpkg-alternatives puts it;

The installed file is at:

/usr/lib/firefox/plugins/flashplugin-alternative.so

While Firefox looks at the following for plugins:

   /usr/lib/firefox-3.0b3/plugins/

(The "plugins"-folder in a symlink to "../firefox-addons/plugins/")

Alas running this command makes it work (at least on my machine):

sudo cp /usr/lib/firefox/plugins/flashplugin-alternative.so /usr/lib
/firefox-addons/plugins/

/etc/lsb-release:
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu hardy (development branch)"

~ >apt-cache policy flashplugin-nonfree
flashplugin-nonfree:
  Installed: 9.0.115.0ubuntu4
  Candidate: 9.0.115.0ubuntu4
  Version table:
 *** 9.0.115.0ubuntu4 0
500 http://dk.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/multiverse Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
~ >apt-cache policy firefox
firefox:
  Installed: 3.0~b3+nobinonly-0ubuntu4
  Candidate: 3.0~b3+nobinonly-0ubuntu4
  Version table:
 *** 3.0~b3+nobinonly-0ubuntu4 0
500 http://dk.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

** Affects: firefox
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: firefox
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
Firefox fails to see flashplugin-nonfree (Hardy)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201209
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 201056] Re: Firefox font size rendering (Hardy)

2008-03-11 Thread msiebuhr
After installing liferea, the error also seems to occur there. (Does it
use Gecko for rendering, or?)

** Attachment added: "Liferea screenshot"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12583040/Screenshot-Liferea.png

** Also affects: liferea
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
Firefox font size rendering (Hardy)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201056
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 201056] Re: Firefox font size rendering (Hardy)

2008-03-11 Thread msiebuhr

** Attachment added: "Screenshot"
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12583013/Screenshot-Bug%20%23154817%20in%20firefox%20%28Ubuntu%29%3A%20%E2%80%9CFirefox%20uses%20problematic%20fonts%E2%80%9D%20-%20Mozilla%20Firefox%203%20Beta%203.png

-- 
Firefox font size rendering (Hardy)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201056
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 201056] [NEW] Firefox font size rendering (Hardy)

2008-03-11 Thread msiebuhr
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: firefox

Firefox mixes up font sizes after upgrade to Hardy (clean install from
alpha 6). I've since enabled sub-pixel font-smoothing (no changes),
added msttcorefonts and tried playing around with both GNOME and Firefox
font settings, but to no avail.

** Affects: liferea
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Firefox font size rendering (Hardy)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201056
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 115514] Re: Album cover art cannot be easily changed

2008-01-14 Thread msiebuhr
A note on this one. This is very annoying for non-English albums. As the
albums doesn't exist in Amazon (or whatever sources RB uses), it will
make a wild - and always incorrect guess - at the cover art.

In Windows Media Player 11, you can drag-and-drop an image on (almost)
any UI-element that shows cover-art to change it.

Related to this - if you add a cover.jpg to a directory with songs AFTER
RB fetched it's own cover art, it will never use the correct (i.e.
manually inserted) cover art. I do strongly feel that RB should prefer
whatever the user have deemed the correct cover instead of what RB
thinks it is.

-- 
Album cover art cannot be easily changed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115514
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 114395] Re: ip6tables MAN-page out of date

2007-12-28 Thread msiebuhr
Still goes for 7.10. I can repeat the above example, yet when I look
through the MAN-page:

> zcat /usr/share/man/man8/ip6tables.8.gz | grep -i related
>

-- 
ip6tables MAN-page out of date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114395
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 173686] Re: vmware-server break PAM

2007-12-03 Thread msiebuhr
Update: Fix from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/112937 seems to
remedy the problem.

-- 
vmware-server break PAM
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173686
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 173686] vmware-server break PAM

2007-12-03 Thread msiebuhr
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: vmware-server

After installing vmware-server you cannot do remote or local logins on
the machine.

login[4130]: PAM (login) illegal module type: @include
login[4130]: PAM pam_parse: expecting return value; [...common-auth]
login[4130]: PAM (login) no module name supplied
login[4130]: PAM unable to dlopen(<*unknown module path*>)
login[4130]: PAM [error: <*unknown module path*>: cannot open shared object 
file: No such file or directory]
login[4130]: PAM adding faulty module: <*unknown module path*>
login[4130]: PAM (login) illegal module type: @include
login[4130]: PAM pam_parse: expecting return value; [...common-account]
login[4130]: PAM (login) no module name supplied
login[4130]: PAM (login) illegal module type: @include
login[4130]: PAM pam_parse: expecting return value; [...common-session]
login[4130]: PAM (login) no module name supplied
login[4130]: PAM (login) illegal module type: @include
login[4130]: PAM pam_parse: expecting return value; [...common-password]
login[4130]: PAM (login) no module name supplied
login[4130]: PAM (other) illegal module type: @include
login[4130]: PAM pam_parse: expecting return value; [...common-auth]
login[4130]: PAM (other) no module name supplied
login[4130]: PAM (other) illegal module type: @include
login[4130]: PAM pam_parse: expecting return value; [...common-account]
login[4130]: PAM (other) no module name supplied
login[4130]: PAM (other) illegal module type: @include
login[4130]: PAM pam_parse: expecting return value; [...common-password]
login[4130]: PAM (other) no module name supplied
login[4130]: PAM (other) illegal module type: @include
login[4130]: PAM pam_parse: expecting return value; [...common-session]
login[4130]: PAM (other) no module name supplied
login[4130]: FAILED LOGIN (1) on 'tty1' FOR `msiebuhr', Module is unknown

After I commented out the @include-lines in /etc/pam.d/vmware-authd, as
shown below, I can login again.

#%PAM-1.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] common-auth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] common-account

** Affects: vmware-server (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
vmware-server break PAM
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173686
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 79182] Re: ipset is not useful in ubuntu, because kernel and iptables do not support it.

2007-11-18 Thread msiebuhr
Tested on 7.10 with same results - the kernel-space is missing...

** Changed in: ipset (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
ipset is not useful in ubuntu, because kernel and iptables do not support it.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/79182
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 137205] Re: [gutsy] latexsuite doesn't load in vim after install

2007-10-08 Thread msiebuhr
When I look at where vim searches for plugins, I get

:set runtimepath
runtimepath=~/.vim,/var/lib/vim/addons,/usr/share/vim/vimfiles,/usr/share/vim/vim71,/usr/share/vim/vimfiles/after,/var/lib/vim/addons/after,~/.vim/after

While, in a shell, it seems vim-latexsuite is not installed in a path searched 
by vim:
# locate latex-suite
...
/usr/share/vim/addons/ftplugin/latex-suite
...

AFAIK, to find vim-latexsuite, vim should look in
/usr/share/vim/addons/, which it does not. OR vim-latexsuite should be
installed in /var/lib/vim/addons/, which it is not...

Continuing this reasoning, adding the following to my .vimrc should fix it:
set runtimepath+=/usr/share/vim/addons/

Opening a .tex-file after making this modification, things now work...

(Oh, and I had vim-full installed, but vim-latexsuite still did not work
for me...)

-- 
[gutsy] latexsuite doesn't load in vim after install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137205
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138277] Re: Gnome settings daemon doesn't work

2007-09-18 Thread msiebuhr
The problem disappeared for me with the latest Gutsy-updates - gnome-
control-center (1:2.19.92-0ubuntu3).

-- 
Gnome settings daemon doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138277
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138277] Re: Gnome settings daemon doesn't work

2007-09-17 Thread msiebuhr
Likewise here. My error contain slightly different values, though:

The program 'gnome-settings-daemon' received an X Window System error.
This probably reflects a bug in the program.
The error was 'BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation)'.
  (Details: serial 502 error_code 2 request_code 146 minor_code 35)
  (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously;
   that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it.
   To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line
   option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful
   backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.)
[1190042028,000,xklavier.c:xkl_engine_start_listen/]The backend does not 
require manual layout management - but it is provided by the application

-- 
Gnome settings daemon doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138277
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138680] Printer support broken (Feisty -> Gutsy upgrade)

2007-09-10 Thread msiebuhr
Public bug reported:

After upgrading from Feisty -> Gutsy, my printer would not print
anything.

Whenever I would print something with lpr x.pdf, the notification-
icon shows up, and the job is in the list. Likewise, the job appears
with the lpq command.

After inspecting /var/log/cups/error_log (empty), I tried the printer-
settings - where there were set no default printer and all printers had
the "Enabled" unchecked. I enabled my printer and set it as default
(which, by the way, unchecks the "enabled"-option...) and re-checked the
"enabled".

Now it works like usual.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Printer support broken (Feisty -> Gutsy upgrade)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138680
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138198] Re: Lifrea notification-area icon shows only partly

2007-09-08 Thread msiebuhr
Screenshot of the error.

** Attachment added: "Liferea-icon.png"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9188746/Liferea-icon.png

-- 
Lifrea notification-area icon shows only partly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138198
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 138198] Lifrea notification-area icon shows only partly

2007-09-08 Thread msiebuhr
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: liferea

The Lifrea-icon in the notification-area shows only just over half the
icon - the rest is blank.

This is from using Lifrea 1.4-RC3.

** Affects: liferea (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Lifrea notification-area icon shows only partly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138198
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 79182] Re: ipset is not useful in ubuntu, because kernel and iptables do not support it.

2007-07-22 Thread msiebuhr
I've also looked at this for several projects, but I was somewhat
confused that Ubuntu had the userspace tools, but not the kernelspace
implementation compiled in...

-- 
ipset is not useful in ubuntu, because kernel and iptables do not support it.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/79182
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 114395] ip6tables MAN-page out of date

2007-05-13 Thread msiebuhr
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: iptables

The man-page of ip6tables does not mention some of the available
features in ip6tables. As an example, the "match" module is not
mentioned, but it clearly work:

~ >sudo ip6tables -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -A INPUT -j ACCEPT
~ >sudo ip6tables -nL INPUT
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source   destination 
ACCEPT 0::/0 ::/0   state 
RELATED,ESTABLISHED 
~ >

** Affects: iptables (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
ip6tables MAN-page out of date
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114395
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 107470] Re: Default install of varnish cannot start

2007-04-18 Thread msiebuhr
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 77624 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77624

Confirmed results of duplicate bug. When installing the package
libc6-dev, it works right away

~ >sudo apt-get install libc6-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  linux-libc-dev
Suggested packages:
  glibc-doc manpages-dev
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libc6-dev linux-libc-dev
0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 3682kB of archives.
After unpacking 16,4MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? 
Get:1 http://dk.archive.ubuntu.com feisty/main linux-libc-dev 2.6.20-15.27 
[664kB]
Get:2 http://dk.archive.ubuntu.com feisty/main libc6-dev 2.5-0ubuntu14 [3018kB]
Fetched 3682kB in 10s (351kB/s) 
 
Selecting previously deselected package linux-libc-dev.
(Reading database ... 16664 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking linux-libc-dev (from .../linux-libc-dev_2.6.20-15.27_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libc6-dev.
Unpacking libc6-dev (from .../libc6-dev_2.5-0ubuntu14_i386.deb) ...
Setting up varnish (1.0.2-2) ...
Starting HTTPd accelerator: pclose=0
Creating new SHMFILE
varnish.

Setting up linux-libc-dev (2.6.20-15.27) ...
Setting up libc6-dev (2.5-0ubuntu14) ...
~ >

Note that I'm by no means into deb-packages, and my patch may be off by
some amount...

** Attachment added: "Patch to require libc6-dev for installation (untested)"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7343240/varnish_libc6-dev_include.patch

-- 
Default install of varnish cannot start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107470
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 107470] Default install of varnish cannot start

2007-04-18 Thread msiebuhr
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 77624 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77624

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: varnish

When installing varnish, it cannot start by default. I suspect the
default configuration file is not correctly set up

sudo apt-get install varnish

...

Setting up varnish (1.0.2-2) ...
Starting HTTPd accelerator: /usr/bin/ld: crti.o: No such file: No such file or 
directory
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
pclose=256
Internal error: GCC returned 0x0100
invoke-rc.d: initscript varnish, action "start" failed.
dpkg: error processing varnish (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Errors were encountered while processing:
 varnish
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
~ >sudo /etc/init.d/varnish start
Starting HTTPd accelerator: /usr/bin/ld: crti.o: No such file: No such file or 
directory
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
pclose=256
Internal error: GCC returned 0x0100
~ >

** Affects: varnish (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 77624
   missing dependency ?

-- 
Default install of varnish cannot start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107470
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 106190] Re: Feisty's does not boot with Linux 2.6.20-14

2007-04-13 Thread msiebuhr
I can confirm this on a Dell Latitude X1, see attached screenshot. Note
that the kernel tries to get hold of the SATA controller (at least)
twice; one in the beginning of the text and one in the end.

haelters: I'm not sure this is a duplicate. Yes, SATA fails in both
cases, but with different error messages. But as I'm terribly wise in
the ways of Linux kernels, I could very well be wrong.

** Attachment added: "Screenshot of error"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7319382/IMG_7333.JPG

-- 
Feisty's does not boot with Linux 2.6.20-14
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106190
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96870] Re: 2.6.20-13 breaks internal SD card reader and suspend to memory

2007-04-11 Thread msiebuhr
I can confirm Jeff250's post; I can mount my drive manually as well.

-- 
2.6.20-13 breaks internal SD card reader and suspend to memory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96870
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96870] Re: 2.6.20-13 breaks internal SD card reader and suspend to memory

2007-03-31 Thread msiebuhr
Just found out that I actually had a -12 kernel installed.
Unfortunately, the above just repeats when trying with -12.

Does this make another bug; could it be udev/gnome-volume-manager
-related?

-- 
2.6.20-13 breaks internal SD card reader and suspend to memory
https://launchpad.net/bugs/96870

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 96870] Re: 2.6.20-13 breaks internal SD card reader and suspend to memory

2007-03-31 Thread msiebuhr
While I haven't got around to install a -12 kernel, I've followed the
steps in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingRemovableDevices";>
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingRemovableDevices on a -13:

>From a Dell Latitude X1 installed with Feisty Beta from scratch. The SD-
card was inserted, then removed ~20 seconds later.

~ >uname -a
Linux staalhandske 2.6.20-13-generic #2 SMP Sun Mar 25 00:21:25 UTC 2007 i686 
GNU/Linux
~ >id
uid=1000(msiebuhr) gid=1000(msiebuhr) 
groups=4(adm),20(dialout),24(cdrom),25(floppy),29(audio),30(dip),44(video),46(plugdev),110(netdev),111(lpadmin),113(powerdev),114(scanner),116(admin),1000(msiebuhr)
~ >id haldaemon
uid=107(haldaemon) gid=112(haldaemon) 
groups=112(haldaemon),24(cdrom),25(floppy),46(plugdev),113(powerdev)
~ >lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 915GM/PM/GMS/910GML Express 
Processor to DRAM Controller (rev 03)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 915GM/GMS/910GML 
Express Graphics Controller (rev 03)
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 915GM/GMS/910GML Express 
Graphics Controller (rev 03)
00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) PCI 
Express Port 1 (rev 03)
00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) 
USB UHCI #1 (rev 03)
00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) 
USB UHCI #2 (rev 03)
00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) 
USB UHCI #3 (rev 03)
00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) 
USB UHCI #4 (rev 03)
00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) 
USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 03)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge (rev d3)
00:1e.2 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW 
(ICH6 Family) AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 03)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801FBM (ICH6M) LPC Interface Bridge 
(rev 03)
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) 
IDE Controller (rev 03)
01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5751 Gigabit 
Ethernet PCI Express (rev 01)
02:01.0 CardBus bridge: Ricoh Co Ltd RL5c476 II (rev b3)
02:01.1 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Ricoh Co Ltd R5C552 IEEE 1394 Controller (rev 08)
02:01.2 Generic system peripheral [0805]: Ricoh Co Ltd R5C822 
SD/SDIO/MMC/MS/MSPro Host Adapter (rev 17)
02:03.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 2200BG Network 
Connection (rev 05)
~ >


** Attachment added: "Output from gnome-volume-manager, udev, ls -l /dev/sd*, 
uname and dmesg"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7095413/messages.tar.gz

-- 
2.6.20-13 breaks internal SD card reader and suspend to memory
https://launchpad.net/bugs/96870

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs