[Bug 982548] Re: When I render two files from osm data, both have the same image
Why are you reporting this on launchpad? This is a Mapnik bug, not a packaging bug. But, anyway - it was fixed a long time ago. https://github.com/mapnik/mapnik/issues/542 (original issue at http://173.255.217.246:8000/mapnik_trac/ticket/542) The fix is present in Mapnik 0.7.2, Mapnik 2.0.0, and Mapnik 2.0.1 releases. ** Bug watch added: 173.255.217.246/mapnik_trac/ #542 http://173.255.217.246:8000/mapnik_trac/ticket/542 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/982548 Title: When I render two files from osm data, both have the same image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mapnik/+bug/982548/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 655629] Re: New Boost Versions 1.43.0 and 1.44.0
Yes, please, +2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655629 Title: New Boost Versions 1.43.0 and 1.44.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boost/+bug/655629/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 393923] Re: agg_rasterizer_cells_aa.h missing #includes and so it doesn't compile on new GCC versions
ping on this. this is a bug introduced by a patch applied to the debian package to fix a difference bug. It was this patch (that is needed to fix a recursion bug) http://patch- tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/agg/2.5+dfsg1-3/05_fix_recursion_crash.dpatch which causes the compiler errors. This is a proposed change: http://trac.mapnik.org/changeset/1801/trunk/agg/include/agg_rasterizer_cells_aa.h Note: same bug for debian package is here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=575620 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #575620 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=575620 -- agg_rasterizer_cells_aa.h missing #includes and so it doesn't compile on new GCC versions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393923 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526070] Re: [FFe] Inclusion of Mapnik 0.7.0
Mapnik 0.7.1 will also be released in several days: http://trac.mapnik.org/milestone/0.7.1 -- [FFe] Inclusion of Mapnik 0.7.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526070 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 452733] Re: missing libsigc++-2.0 dependency breaks cairomm pkg-config search
ping -- missing libsigc++-2.0 dependency breaks cairomm pkg-config search https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 496327] Re: lacking python-cairo dependency causes segmentation fault
note, this is fixed in the 0.7.0 release, so this bug can be closed if https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mapnik/+bug/526070 were addressed. -- lacking python-cairo dependency causes segmentation fault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496327 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526070] Re: [FFe] Inclusion of Mapnik 0.7.0
Thanks Christophe for working to get Mapnik 0.7.0 in Lucid - all tests are passing for me on lucid and this would be a great thing to have included in the LTS. Hopefully the release managers can approve soon. - Dane (Upstream Mapnik developer) -- [FFe] Inclusion of Mapnik 0.7.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526070 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 452733] Re: missing libsigc++-2.0 dependency breaks cairomm pkg-config search
also a problem on LUCID -- missing libsigc++-2.0 dependency breaks cairomm pkg-config search https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 452733] Re: missing libsigc++-2.0 dependency breaks cairomm pkg-config search
Is anyone maintaining this package? ** Also affects: mapnik (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- missing libsigc++-2.0 dependency breaks cairomm pkg-config search https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 496327] [NEW] lacking python-cairo dependency causes segmentation fault
Public bug reported: Urgent, we need an update to the python-mapnik package. When Karmic systems do not have the 'python-cairo' package installed the python-mapnik package is unusable and segfaults. This was fixed in the debian 0.6.1 package and upstream - both workarounds. Ideally the existing python-mapnik package can up updated so that python-cairo is a required dependency AND the fix from upstream can be included as a patch. See http://trac.mapnik.org/ticket/392 for more detail. Here is the situation on a fresh Karmic machine: # apt-get install python-mapnik # python >>> from mapnik import * >>> m = Map(10,10) >>> im = Image(10,10) >>> render(m,im) Segmentation fault # apt-get install python-cairo # python >>> from mapnik import * >>> m = Map(10,10) >>> im = Image(10,10) >>> render(m,im) >>> # works! ** Affects: mapnik (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- lacking python-cairo dependency causes segmentation fault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496327 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 452733] Re: missing libsigc++-2.0 dependency breaks cairomm pkg-config search
ping -- missing libsigc++-2.0 dependency breaks cairomm pkg-config search https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 489943] Re: package python-mapnik 0.6.1-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: 9.04 to 9.10
Hmm, all I see in the logs is: python-mapnik (0.6.1-0ubuntu4) ... pycentral: pycentral pkginstall: Not overwriting local files: dpkg: /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/mapnik/ogcserver/modserver.py not found. pycentral pkginstall: Not overwriting local files: dpkg: /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/mapnik/ogcserver/modserver.py not found. 'modserver.py' was a new file in 0.6.0. I'm not sure why that would cause problems in an upgrade. -- package python-mapnik 0.6.1-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: 9.04 to 9.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 452733] [NEW] missing libsigc++-2.0 dependency breaks cairomm pkg-config search
Public bug reported: Description:Ubuntu karmic (development branch) Release:9.10 To replicate: $ sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade $ sudo apt-get install libcairomm-1.0-1 libcairomm-1.0-dev libsigc++ should have been installed when libcairomm* was requested but was not. So, when trying to configure a package with pkg-config this fails: $ pkg-config --exists 'cairomm-1.0' d...@ubuntu:~/src/mapnik-trunk$ pkg-config --libs 'cairomm-1.0' Package sigc++-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `sigc++-2.0.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package 'sigc++-2.0', required by 'cairomm', not found Manually running works: $ sudo apt-get install libsigc* $ pkg-config --libs 'cairomm-1.0' -lcairomm-1.0 -lcairo -lsigc-2.0 This is affecting the python-mapnik package when installed from apt-get packages. >>> import mapnik leads to: ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/mapnik/_mapnik.so: undefined symbol: _ZN6mapnik19cairo_renderer_base7processERKNS_15text_symbolizerERKNS_7featureINS_8geometryINS_6vertexIdLi2EN5boost10shared_ptrINS_6rasterERKNS_14proj_transformE Uninstalling the python-mapnik package, after installing libsigc++, then reinstalling python-mapnik fixes the above undefined symbol error. ** Affects: cairomm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- missing libsigc++-2.0 dependency breaks cairomm pkg-config search https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268711] Re: gpsdrive crash at launch
Yes, 'got exception...' is coming out of the mapnik 'shape.input' dynamic library/plugin. If you update gpsdrive against the new Mapnik 0.6.1 package then you should get much better error output. -- gpsdrive crash at launch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268711 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 401970] Re: Include Mapnik 0.6.1 in Karmic
Urgent: please see the upstream fix that is needed for Mapnik 0.6.1 on Karmic: http://trac.mapnik.org/ticket/436 ** Bug watch added: trac.mapnik.org/ #436 https://trac.mapnik.org/ticket/436 -- Include Mapnik 0.6.1 in Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401970 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 401970] Re: Include Mapnik 0.6.1 in Karmic
Any movement on this? What can I do to help get this moving or are we already ensured that 0.6.1 (note the minor 1) will be included in Karmic? Thanks! -- Include Mapnik 0.6.1 in Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401970 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 401970] [NEW] Include Mapnik 0.6.1 in Karmic
Public bug reported: Mapnik 0.6.1 has been released and hopefully packaging could begin soon for inclusion in Karmic: http://trac.mapnik.org/milestone/0.6.1 Let me know how I might help. Cheers, Dane ** Affects: mapnik (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Include Mapnik 0.6.1 in Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401970 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354205] Re: mapnik-python does not build against default python
Great, Just had a chance to test. I removed my manual install of the Mapnik python bindings, purged and re-installed 'python-mapnik' package, ensured both python2.5 and python2.6 were installed, and then was able to successfully do: >>> import mapnik when running the python interpreter both with the default python26 and after jumping into a python2.5 interpreter by typing: $/usr/bin/python2.5 Thanks so much for this fix! The only odd thing is that both the python2.6 and python2.6 Mapnik shared object '_mapnik.so' files appear to be linked against libboost_python*py25*.so. I would assume this would cause problems (based on my experience from Mac OSX and boost libs). $ldd against the boost_python libs show they do not explicitly link against any version of python. Can someone with an understanding of library linking on linux explain why this works? Anyway, I'm glad it does work - thanks for everyone's effort! - Dane -- mapnik-python does not build against default python https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354205 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 378819] Re: Please merge mapnik 0.6.0-1 (universe) from debian unstable (main)
Hey Andres, Okay, regarding #1, perhaps the ubuntu build does not write out the pickled configuration options correctly (due to permissions problems). It would be interesting to know why that does not work (from a Mapnik perspective), but I'd say if it works for Ubuntu to keep the $(SCONS_FLAGS) in each stage, thats fine - keep it that way. No harm done - really the only side effect is potentially slightly longer times waiting for the configure stage and the possibility of recompiling targets more than once when SCons senses that the exact options have changed. -- Please merge mapnik 0.6.0-1 (universe) from debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378819 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 378819] Re: Please merge mapnik 0.6.0-1 (universe) from debian unstable (main)
Hello Andres, 1) Yes, I'm indicating that based on changes I made to Mapnik's use of SCons for the 0.6.0 release, the flags are only needed during configure. Previous to these changes the same flags were needed in each step, but now we pickle the options and re-used them for the build/install/clean stages. There is no problem with supplying the flags each time, and it very well may be important to do so based on the way your build scripts work. I'm just saying that from a Mapnik perspective the flags should only be needed to be specified once. 2) okay, great, last release it took 14 days from release to get into debian unstable. So, we'll shoot for that happening before August! Thanks. 3) re: boost, glad it is working now! -- Please merge mapnik 0.6.0-1 (universe) from debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378819 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354205] Re: mapnik-python does not build against default python
Hello Andres and Christopher, Great to see movement on this. Two thoughs: 1) Andres I took a quick look at your diff, and noticed that you are passing in the python version both in the configure step and the compile/install/clean step, which is unneeded. If you configure with scons configure $(SCONS_FLAGS) PYTHON=/usr/bin/python$* you can drop all command line flags in the compile/install/clean steps otherwise it will prompt the Mapnik scons scripts to re-configure (which may not be the intention) every time a flag is picked up. 2) When is the latest time we (upstream) can release 0.6.1 to have a chance for it to be included in Karmic? And what can I/we do to help with the boost compile problem on Karmic? Cheers, Dane Springmeyer -- mapnik-python does not build against default python https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354205 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 378819] Re: Please merge mapnik 0.6.0-1 (universe) from debian unstable (main)
Hello Andres and Christopher, Great to see movement on this. Two thoughs: 1) Andres I took a quick look at your diff, and notices that you are passing in the python version both in the configure step and the compile/install/clean step, which is unneeded. If you configure with scons configure $(SCONS_FLAGS) PYTHON=/usr/bin/python$* you can drop all command line flags in the compile/install/clean steps otherwise it will prompt the Mapnik scons scripts to re-configure (which may not be the intention). 2) When is the latest time we upstream can release 0.6.1 to have a chance for that to be included in Karmic? And what can I/we do to help with the boost compile problem on Karmic? Cheers, Dane Springmeyer On May 20, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Andres E. Rodriguez Lazo wrote: > Yes, I'll wait because I still need to wait till boost1.38 hits the > archive... I'm attaching the debdiff if you want to take a look at it. > > ** Attachment added: "mapnik_0.6.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff" > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26990877/mapnik_0.6.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff > > -- > Please merge mapnik 0.6.0-1 (universe) from debian unstable (main) > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378819 > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to > mapnik > in ubuntu. > > Status in “mapnik” source package in Ubuntu: In Progress > > Bug description: > mapnik (0.6.0-1) unstable; urgency=low > . > * New upstream release (closes: #522823, #523190) > * Update debian/build-svn-tarball.sh for next major release > * Update build-dep from proj to libproj-dev to reflect proj package > reorganization (closes: #521818) > * Add explicit configure step in debian/rules > * Update Standards-Version (no changes) > * Update build-dep from libltdl3-dev to libltdl-dev to reflect > libtool > changes > * Changes from Ubuntu: > - add Homepage control field > - update python-mapnik install file to be compatible with Python > 2.6 > transition > * Remove old transitional mapnik-plugins package > * Don't install demo/c++/Makefile as we aren't shipping pkg-config > files > * Switch to new boost 1.38 packages -- Please merge mapnik 0.6.0-1 (universe) from debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378819 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354205] Re: mapnik-python does not build against default python
I have the same question as Thomas. I see the karmic tag in the fix applied. Why not make it available to Jaunty since that is where the problem is? Also, we've released Mapnik 0.6.0 which **ideally** should be the package available in Karmic, if not Mapnik 0.6.1 (due out in several weeks). Thoughts? I'm new to learning about this packaging and would benefit from a sense of who things work. Also, would it be possible in Karmic to provide two python-mapnik packages? One built against python2.5/boost_python-mt-py25.so and one against python2.6/boost-python-mt-py26? This would be really really useful for integrating Mapnik with QuantumGIS, which depends on Python2.5 Thoughts on that? -- mapnik-python does not build against default python https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354205 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354205] Re: mapnik-python does not build against default python
Whoops, just realized this may have been fixed yesterday (perhaps moments before I tested) Also it should clarify that I don't know what version of Python the package build against, all I mean to indicate is that the location of installation was wrong. It would be interesting if it did actually compile against the python25 headers (and boost compiled against 2.5 headers) since it still seemed to work when I simply put it on my PYTHONPATH. -- mapnik-python does not build against default python https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354205 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354205] [NEW] mapnik-python does not build against default python
Public bug reported: I was simulating the upgrade from the packaged mapnik 0.5.1 (0.5.1-3ubuntu2) to the newly released mapnik 0.6.0 on Jauny (9.04 development branch) and noticed that python26 is the default Python on jauny while the mapnik package gets installed in the 'site-packages' folder of python2.5 Or at least this is what happened with the steps I followed which were: $ sudo apt-get build-deps python-mapnik $ sudo apt-get install python-mapnik $ python >>> import mapnik # error not found While the package likely should have been installed in '/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages' it was rather installed in '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages' I put the python2.5 spot on the PYTHONPATH then it worked. Then I commenced installing mapnik 0.6.0 which went into '/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages' and ran great. ** Affects: mapnik (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- mapnik-python does not build against default python https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354205 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
