Re: [Bug 328621] Re: Evolution: exchange email auto completion suddenly stops working
Thank you Pedro, I really appreciate you bug squashing work. I've continued to use Ubuntu despite casual difficulties with Exchange. I really can't say where is the problem, but I think this is hard to solve, since MS stuff is involved. Ubuntu 9.04 made a radical change in that respect, since Evolution now supports MAPI directly - whereas now Evolution connects to Exchange via web interface. I would really love to do the switch, too bad I'm hearing that this MAPI support is still very limited and buggy, so being my production machine, for now I prefer something more stable. Nevertheless at home I've converted all my PCs to JJ and I think it is simply AWESOME. So I don't really know how to help here, I don't even know how to reproduce this issue... Thanks, see you soon. 2009/5/8 Pedro Villavicencio > Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make > Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been > any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue > for you? Could you try to reproduce the same with Ubuntu 9.04? Thanks in > advance. > > ** Changed in: evolution-exchange (Ubuntu) >Status: New => Incomplete > > -- > Evolution: exchange email auto completion suddenly stops working > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328621 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in “evolution-exchange” source package in Ubuntu: Incomplete > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: evolution-exchange > > Hi, > I'm using Evolution with Exchange server in our organization. > > What I'm finding is that, at random times, evolution email auto-completion > stops working. I start typing some email addresses, but it doesn't complete > them. The only remedy is to close and restart evolution. > > I tried sniffing network traffic and I found something interesting. > > The exchange server actually provides some reply but evolution-exchange > don't read the data. The socket queue is filled, and netstat reports high > RECVQ. Also from tcpdump I see a zero windows annouced from my PC, meaning > that the socket queue is full but the application process don't read it. > > It is very likely that during such issues evolution-exchange hangs for some > reason. > > $ apt-cache policy evolution-exchange > evolution-exchange: > Installed: 2.24.3-0ubuntu1 > Candidate: 2.24.3-0ubuntu1 > Version table: > *** 2.24.3-0ubuntu1 0 >500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid-updates/main Packages >100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 2.24.1-0ubuntu1 0 >500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages > > Description:Ubuntu 8.10 > Release:8.10 > -- Evolution: exchange email auto completion suddenly stops working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 383295] Re: update-manager hangs on Jaunty
Hi Christoph, the dir you mention is empty. Too bad I don't have a way to reproduce this bug, since actually I've not done anything particular. It is a fresh install though. Only thing I did is to install on an ext4 partition, but I don't think this might be a problem. Looking at the file: /var/log/dpkg.log I can see that the last package update of this laptop was on 6 June! Even security fixes are not installed, given that I still have Firefox 3.0.10: $ dpkg -l firefox Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Nome Versione Descrizione +++-==-==- ii firefox3.0.10+nobinon meta package for the popular mozilla web bro This is really a serious problem, if people cannot get security updates. I attach the last dpkg.log, let me know if there is anything more I can do to track this down. Laptop is an Olidata ACL 10. Thanks! ** Attachment added: "dpkg.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28177157/dpkg.log -- update-manager hangs on Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383295 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 246099] Re: Screen corruption while scrolling gnome-system-monitor process list
Hi Phil, this is not a solution to this bug, but what about trying the nouveau driver? It's opensource from scratch and is included in Jaunty. Too bad up to now 3D is not supported, but if you use 2D-only stuff like me, I think you'll be quite happy. I'm using it on a couple of PCs and so far I'm very happy, no issues found. And it solved also some screen corruption issues I was having before with nv and close driver. If you want to give it a try: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_904_nouveau&num=1 2009/5/5 Phil Ayres > This is a bug for me. My configuration is a Dell Latitude D800 using > NVIDIA proprietary driver version 96. I tend to get horrible scrolling > performance in any Firefox that is graphically rich (or maybe that's > Adobe Flash doing that) , but nothing that corrupts like this. > > System Monitor: 2.26.0.1 running on Jaunty 9.04. Previously 8.10 was > equally bad. > > -- > Screen corruption while scrolling gnome-system-monitor process list > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246099 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in Ubuntu: Fix Released > > Bug description: > Hi, > after some scrolling in the gnome-system-monitor process list, the list > itself gets corrupted. > > I don't know which package should be blamed, but the problem don't seem to > be present in all gtk lists - for example, scrolling in the rythmbox song > list works correctly. > > I attach a screenshot which clarifies this issue. > > I'm using Hardy up to date, NVIDIA drivers, metacity. > > Let me know if you need any other info. > > s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -rd > Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1 > Release:8.04 > > s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ apt-cache policy gnome-system-monitor > gnome-system-monitor: > Installed: 2.22.1-0ubuntu2 > Candidate: 2.22.1-0ubuntu2 > Version table: > *** 2.22.1-0ubuntu2 0 >500 http://sm.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-updates/main Packages >100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 2.22.0-1ubuntu3 0 >500 http://sm.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages > > s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ apt-cache policy nvidia-glx > nvidia-glx: > Installed: 1:96.43.05+2.6.24.13-19.44 > Candidate: 1:96.43.05+2.6.24.13-19.44 > Version table: > *** 1:96.43.05+2.6.24.13-19.44 0 >500 http://sm.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-updates/restricted Packages >100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 1:96.43.05+2.6.24.13-18.41 0 >500 http://security.ubuntu.com hardy-security/restricted Packages > 1:96.43.05+2.6.24.12-16.34 0 >500 http://sm.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/restricted Packages > > s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ apt-cache policy nvidia-kernel-common > nvidia-kernel-common: > Installed: 20051028+1ubuntu8 > Candidate: 20051028+1ubuntu8 > Version table: > *** 20051028+1ubuntu8 0 >500 http://sm.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/restricted Packages >100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > -- Screen corruption while scrolling gnome-system-monitor process list https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246099 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 369850] Re: Cannot set up parallel port printer on Ubuntu 9.04
Same problem here, had to get an Intrepid machine to print a document I needed. /dev/lp0 doesn't even exists. -- Cannot set up parallel port printer on Ubuntu 9.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369850 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 373399] [NEW] Please add 'fio' to ubuntu universe
Public bug reported: Hi, I would be very glad to have in ubuntu repositories one of the best IO performance testing tool out there, fio. Its author doesn't need any presentations, since it is Jens Axboe, the maintainer of the linux kernel block level, author of CFQ IO scheduler and blktrace. You can find it there: http://freshmeat.net/projects/fio/ Thanks a lot! ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: needs-packaging -- Please add 'fio' to ubuntu universe https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373399 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 373401] [NEW] Please add 'smem' to ubuntu universe
Public bug reported: Hi, it would be very good to have the tool 'smem' into ubuntu repositories. Its aim is to shed some light into process memory consumption, in a way that no other program is able to do. Its author is Matt Makart, a known linux kernel hacker. See here for the details of this great tool: http://lwn.net/Articles/329458/ The tool itself is here: http://www.selenic.com/smem/ Thanks a lot! ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: needs-packaging -- Please add 'smem' to ubuntu universe https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373401 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 217580] Re: Slow performance with Gmail
Definitely, very slow scrolling for me also. Too bad I don't think this bug is considered anymore :( 2009/4/28 aatdark > I can confirm Firefox @ Jaunty running VERY SLOW on very long sites. > My hardware: Nvidia GTS 250 CPU E6600 2GB RAM. > > I testet opera linked with qt3 and it is running extreme fast. No lag at > all. > So this must be a problem either with gtk or with geko engine. > > -- > Slow performance with Gmail > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in XUL + XPCOM application runner: Confirmed > Status in “firefox-3.0” source package in Ubuntu: Invalid > Status in “xulrunner-1.9” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 > > When scrolling in Gmail (and other websites however its not as noticable) > the scrolling performance is terrible. There is a slight lag from when it > starts to scroll to when it actually does scroll. On my Windows XP machine > it is MUCH faster (basically instant). This is present with both Compiz > enabled and disabled. > > ProblemType: Bug > Architecture: i386 > Date: Tue Apr 15 01:01:46 2008 > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 > NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia > Package: firefox-3.0 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 > PackageArchitecture: i386 > ProcEnviron: > > PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games > LANG=en_US.UTF-8 > SHELL=/bin/bash > SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 > Uname: Linux 2.6.24-16-generic i686 > -- Slow performance with Gmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 217580] Re: Slow performance with Gmail
top-idle.log 2009/5/2 Stefano Doni > Here's some hard performance data. > > I've measured Xorg and firefox CPU consumption in two scenarios: > > 1) System completely idle > 2) Firefox open on gmail, only 1 tab, no firefox extensions, scrolling down > this launchpad thread fully expaned with mouse wheel. > > In both cases I've recorded CPU utilization, 10 top recordings every 5 > seconds each of the two processes. Command line: > > top -b -n 10 -d 5 -p $(pidof firefox),$(pidof X) > > I'm attaching the two top logs. Two noteworthy things to point out: > > 1) CPU fully saturated (constantly 100%) when scrolling in gmail! > 2) Process responsible for this is Xorg! > > See the attached logs. One important thing: I'm using nouveau now in > Jaunty. Later I'll redo the recordings with nv and possibily NVIDIA closed > drivers. I don't think it is a matter of driver though, I've opened this > slowness bug when I was using Intrepid with nv and the situation was the > same. > > Now, next step could be to profile the driver and see where the time is > spent. Anyone willing to dive into this with me? I'm willing to profile this > workload, if someone can guide me. > > 2009/5/1 phinn > > Because it's not entirely an Nvidia bug either. My IBM T60 laptop draws >> Firefox pages perfectly smooth with crappy ATI X1400 card compared to my >> high end PC, its ridiculous. However, If you try Opera or Webkit based >> browsers in Linux this problem does not occur. It is only between >> Firefox + Nvidia. >> >> Yea, there should be some kind of bug report filled with Nvidia for sure >> though. As both Firefox and them are to blame. >> >> -- >> Slow performance with Gmail >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580 >> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber >> of the bug. >> >> Status in XUL + XPCOM application runner: Confirmed >> Status in “firefox-3.0” source package in Ubuntu: Invalid >> Status in “xulrunner-1.9” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed >> >> Bug description: >> Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 >> >> When scrolling in Gmail (and other websites however its not as noticable) >> the scrolling performance is terrible. There is a slight lag from when it >> starts to scroll to when it actually does scroll. On my Windows XP machine >> it is MUCH faster (basically instant). This is present with both Compiz >> enabled and disabled. >> >> ProblemType: Bug >> Architecture: i386 >> Date: Tue Apr 15 01:01:46 2008 >> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 >> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia >> Package: firefox-3.0 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 >> PackageArchitecture: i386 >> ProcEnviron: >> >> PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games >> LANG=en_US.UTF-8 >> SHELL=/bin/bash >> SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 >> Uname: Linux 2.6.24-16-generic i686 >> > > ** Attachment added: "top-idle.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26246788/top-idle.log -- Slow performance with Gmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 217580] Re: Slow performance with Gmail
top-firefox-scrolling.log 2009/5/2 Stefano Doni > top-idle.log > > 2009/5/2 Stefano Doni > > Here's some hard performance data. >> >> I've measured Xorg and firefox CPU consumption in two scenarios: >> >> 1) System completely idle >> 2) Firefox open on gmail, only 1 tab, no firefox extensions, scrolling >> down this launchpad thread fully expaned with mouse wheel. >> >> In both cases I've recorded CPU utilization, 10 top recordings every 5 >> seconds each of the two processes. Command line: >> >> top -b -n 10 -d 5 -p $(pidof firefox),$(pidof X) >> >> I'm attaching the two top logs. Two noteworthy things to point out: >> >> 1) CPU fully saturated (constantly 100%) when scrolling in gmail! >> 2) Process responsible for this is Xorg! >> >> See the attached logs. One important thing: I'm using nouveau now in >> Jaunty. Later I'll redo the recordings with nv and possibily NVIDIA closed >> drivers. I don't think it is a matter of driver though, I've opened this >> slowness bug when I was using Intrepid with nv and the situation was the >> same. >> >> Now, next step could be to profile the driver and see where the time is >> spent. Anyone willing to dive into this with me? I'm willing to profile this >> workload, if someone can guide me. >> >> 2009/5/1 phinn >> >> Because it's not entirely an Nvidia bug either. My IBM T60 laptop draws >>> Firefox pages perfectly smooth with crappy ATI X1400 card compared to my >>> high end PC, its ridiculous. However, If you try Opera or Webkit based >>> browsers in Linux this problem does not occur. It is only between >>> Firefox + Nvidia. >>> >>> Yea, there should be some kind of bug report filled with Nvidia for sure >>> though. As both Firefox and them are to blame. >>> >>> -- >>> Slow performance with Gmail >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580 >>> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber >>> of the bug. >>> >>> Status in XUL + XPCOM application runner: Confirmed >>> Status in “firefox-3.0” source package in Ubuntu: Invalid >>> Status in “xulrunner-1.9” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed >>> >>> Bug description: >>> Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 >>> >>> When scrolling in Gmail (and other websites however its not as noticable) >>> the scrolling performance is terrible. There is a slight lag from when it >>> starts to scroll to when it actually does scroll. On my Windows XP machine >>> it is MUCH faster (basically instant). This is present with both Compiz >>> enabled and disabled. >>> >>> ProblemType: Bug >>> Architecture: i386 >>> Date: Tue Apr 15 01:01:46 2008 >>> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 >>> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia >>> Package: firefox-3.0 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 >>> PackageArchitecture: i386 >>> ProcEnviron: >>> >>> >>> PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games >>> LANG=en_US.UTF-8 >>> SHELL=/bin/bash >>> SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 >>> Uname: Linux 2.6.24-16-generic i686 >>> >> >> > ** Attachment added: "top-firefox-scrolling.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26246791/top-firefox-scrolling.log -- Slow performance with Gmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 217580] Re: Slow performance with Gmail
Here's the data of the same firefox scrolling test, this time with nv driver. It seems a little bit better, Xorg draws a little less CPU consumption compared with nouveau, but it is still the bottleneck as you can see. See attachment. 2009/5/2 aatdark > i can confirm bad behaviour on Intel 4500MHD. (After extensive scrolling > the windows turns gray and keeps scrolling) > hope the bug will be fixed in FF 3.5 > > -- > Slow performance with Gmail > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in XUL + XPCOM application runner: Confirmed > Status in “firefox-3.0” source package in Ubuntu: Invalid > Status in “xulrunner-1.9” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 > > When scrolling in Gmail (and other websites however its not as noticable) > the scrolling performance is terrible. There is a slight lag from when it > starts to scroll to when it actually does scroll. On my Windows XP machine > it is MUCH faster (basically instant). This is present with both Compiz > enabled and disabled. > > ProblemType: Bug > Architecture: i386 > Date: Tue Apr 15 01:01:46 2008 > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 > NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia > Package: firefox-3.0 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 > PackageArchitecture: i386 > ProcEnviron: > > PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games > LANG=en_US.UTF-8 > SHELL=/bin/bash > SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 > Uname: Linux 2.6.24-16-generic i686 > ** Attachment added: "top-firefox-scrolling-nv.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26247407/top-firefox-scrolling-nv.log -- Slow performance with Gmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 217580] Re: Slow performance with Gmail
I've profiled the system while executing the previously described workload. Attached you can find oprofile output. Even though there are no symbols (I guess I need debug packages for that), it shows where the time is spent. Alex, let me know if symbols might be interesting to track this down. 2009/5/2 aatdark > although xorg uses all the cpu time it must be a firefox bug because opera > qt does not show any of this issues. > Is this an xulrunner or an firefox bug ? > > ** Also affects: firefox via >https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427431 >Importance: Unknown > Status: Unknown > > -- > Slow performance with Gmail > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in The Mozilla Firefox Browser: Unknown > Status in XUL + XPCOM application runner: Confirmed > Status in “firefox-3.0” source package in Ubuntu: Invalid > Status in “xulrunner-1.9” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 > > When scrolling in Gmail (and other websites however its not as noticable) > the scrolling performance is terrible. There is a slight lag from when it > starts to scroll to when it actually does scroll. On my Windows XP machine > it is MUCH faster (basically instant). This is present with both Compiz > enabled and disabled. > > ProblemType: Bug > Architecture: i386 > Date: Tue Apr 15 01:01:46 2008 > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 > NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia > Package: firefox-3.0 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 > PackageArchitecture: i386 > ProcEnviron: > > PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games > LANG=en_US.UTF-8 > SHELL=/bin/bash > SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 > Uname: Linux 2.6.24-16-generic i686 > ** Attachment added: "oprofile-firefox-scrolling.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26249855/oprofile-firefox-scrolling.log -- Slow performance with Gmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 217580] Re: Slow performance with Gmail
I can confirm this, the difference is like night and day! Sounds like this might be the culprit. Did you find that gmail uses this kind of element? This might point directly to a firefox bug? Thanks, great work! 2009/5/2 aatdark > this is an updated version of the page. It does not contain any > "position:fixed" element on it. > as you can see the scrolling is very fast. > > http://stinkt.kicks- > ass.org/1b6cc1af2e8437646c9b7422d78e6eb3/no_css_fix_pos.html > > (original page with the position:fixed elements) > > http://stinkt.kicks-ass.org/1b6cc1af2e8437646c9b7422d78e6eb3/slidecast%20-%20studio%20-%20vertical-view.html > > -- > Slow performance with Gmail > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in The Mozilla Firefox Browser: Unknown > Status in XUL + XPCOM application runner: Confirmed > Status in “firefox-3.0” source package in Ubuntu: Invalid > Status in “xulrunner-1.9” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 > > When scrolling in Gmail (and other websites however its not as noticable) > the scrolling performance is terrible. There is a slight lag from when it > starts to scroll to when it actually does scroll. On my Windows XP machine > it is MUCH faster (basically instant). This is present with both Compiz > enabled and disabled. > > ProblemType: Bug > Architecture: i386 > Date: Tue Apr 15 01:01:46 2008 > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 > NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia > Package: firefox-3.0 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 > PackageArchitecture: i386 > ProcEnviron: > > PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games > LANG=en_US.UTF-8 > SHELL=/bin/bash > SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 > Uname: Linux 2.6.24-16-generic i686 > -- Slow performance with Gmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 217580] Re: Slow performance with Gmail
Sorry Alex, I didn't checked the linked bugs actually! I'm very glad that eventually we all have been able to track this down! I'm not sure this might be a driver issue, IMHO. So far there have been reports of users with Nvidia, Intel and ATI cards (fglrx, see first post of Mozilla bug 422330). A friend of mine keep telling me about this slowness on ATI + radeonhd, also. I think that users that own older PCs tends to notice this much more - my CPU is a 1.6 GHZ AMD Athlon, and scrolling is VERY slugghish. At work I use a much more recent notebook with ATI + radeon, and the scrolling slowness is still there, but a bit less relevant. So, we've likely found the long standing bug that is affecting us, good. On bugzilla I see the status is NEW, and no more activity since August 2008. Alex, is there something we can do to speedup this bug fixing? Perhaps aatdark work can be useful, since it provides a clean testcase? Will FF 3.5 still have this bug? Thanks 2009/5/2 Alexander Sack > >Did you find that gmail uses this kind of element? This might point > directly > to a firefox bug? > > well. i already said above that fixed positioning is known to have > performance issues (and i gave bugzilla IDs above for them); besides > from that its also a driver issue, because it works better with some > drivers; the fact that other browsers dont hit this, doesn't mean that > the drivers are right. > > -- > Slow performance with Gmail > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in The Mozilla Firefox Browser: Unknown > Status in XUL + XPCOM application runner: Confirmed > Status in “firefox-3.0” source package in Ubuntu: Invalid > Status in “xulrunner-1.9” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 > > When scrolling in Gmail (and other websites however its not as noticable) > the scrolling performance is terrible. There is a slight lag from when it > starts to scroll to when it actually does scroll. On my Windows XP machine > it is MUCH faster (basically instant). This is present with both Compiz > enabled and disabled. > > ProblemType: Bug > Architecture: i386 > Date: Tue Apr 15 01:01:46 2008 > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 > NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia > Package: firefox-3.0 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 > PackageArchitecture: i386 > ProcEnviron: > > PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games > LANG=en_US.UTF-8 > SHELL=/bin/bash > SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 > Uname: Linux 2.6.24-16-generic i686 > -- Slow performance with Gmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 217580] Re: Slow performance with Gmail
Sorry, I watched the wrong bug on mozilla. The culprit, as Sack pointed out, should be this one: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427431 Great Bernhard, I see that you already pointed out your work, good :) 2009/5/3 Stefano Doni > Sorry Alex, > I didn't checked the linked bugs actually! > > I'm very glad that eventually we all have been able to track this down! > > I'm not sure this might be a driver issue, IMHO. So far there have been > reports of users with Nvidia, Intel and ATI cards (fglrx, see first post of > Mozilla bug 422330). A friend of mine keep telling me about this slowness on > ATI + radeonhd, also. > > I think that users that own older PCs tends to notice this much more - my > CPU is a 1.6 GHZ AMD Athlon, and scrolling is VERY slugghish. At work I use > a much more recent notebook with ATI + radeon, and the scrolling slowness is > still there, but a bit less relevant. > > > So, we've likely found the long standing bug that is affecting us, good. On > bugzilla I see the status is NEW, and no more activity since August 2008. > > Alex, is there something we can do to speedup this bug fixing? Perhaps > aatdark work can be useful, since it provides a clean testcase? Will FF 3.5 > still have this bug? > > Thanks > > > 2009/5/2 Alexander Sack > > >Did you find that gmail uses this kind of element? This might point >> directly >> to a firefox bug? >> >> well. i already said above that fixed positioning is known to have >> performance issues (and i gave bugzilla IDs above for them); besides >> from that its also a driver issue, because it works better with some >> drivers; the fact that other browsers dont hit this, doesn't mean that >> the drivers are right. >> >> -- >> Slow performance with Gmail >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580 >> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber >> of the bug. >> >> Status in The Mozilla Firefox Browser: Unknown >> Status in XUL + XPCOM application runner: Confirmed >> Status in “firefox-3.0” source package in Ubuntu: Invalid >> Status in “xulrunner-1.9” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed >> >> Bug description: >> Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 >> >> When scrolling in Gmail (and other websites however its not as noticable) >> the scrolling performance is terrible. There is a slight lag from when it >> starts to scroll to when it actually does scroll. On my Windows XP machine >> it is MUCH faster (basically instant). This is present with both Compiz >> enabled and disabled. >> >> ProblemType: Bug >> Architecture: i386 >> Date: Tue Apr 15 01:01:46 2008 >> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 >> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia >> Package: firefox-3.0 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 >> PackageArchitecture: i386 >> ProcEnviron: >> >> PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games >> LANG=en_US.UTF-8 >> SHELL=/bin/bash >> SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 >> Uname: Linux 2.6.24-16-generic i686 >> > > -- Slow performance with Gmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159065] Re: Alarm does not work properly
Bad news guys. I've setup other meetings with Evolution and still no alarm is fired. Actually I've received only one alarm, the one I described above. All the other meetings scheduled does not work, albeit I see the small bell in the calendar. -- Alarm does not work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159065 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159065] Re: Alarm does not work properly
Another update, perhaps I found the issue. Alarms ARE working if I set the appontment to my personal calendar (i.e. the local calendar). In my organization we use MS Exchange. If I set the appointment with the Exchange calendar, no alarm is fired. Perhaps you guys have the same problem? Let me know so that we can finally fix this. -- Alarm does not work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159065 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303691] Re: Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer
Guys, yesterday I tested the new foomatic-filters, as per directions. Too bad I have to tell you that my problem is still there. Just to be more clear regarding the problem I'm experiencing, I've taken a picture with my phone of a test print page. You can find it attached. Thanks again for the efforts, should you need other info to track this down, just let me know. ** Attachment added: "Immag002.jpg" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21637990/Immag002.jpg -- Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303691] Re: Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer
You made it, Tim! Now it prints beautifully! Thank you very much guys, you are doing an incredible work! Bye :-) -- Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 249592] Re: Brasero: hangs during mp3 file loading
I don't think that this update has reached Intrepid repos. I still have a previous release: $ apt-cache policy brasero brasero: Installed: 0.8.2-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 0.8.2-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 0.8.2-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2009/1/28 Guglielmo Cola > Hi. > What about Intrepid users?? > The bug is still here... > > -- > Brasero: hangs during mp3 file loading > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249592 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in A disc burning application for gnome 2: Fix Released > Status in "brasero" source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: brasero > > Hi, > bug regarding Brasero. > > I choose to make an Audio CD. Browse my mp3, select a set of them, drag & > drop them into the right frame in order to import them. > > Brasero start to load them correctly, but sometimes it hangs forever in a > state where some mp3s have been loaded and others not. > > I've noticed one interesting thing though, in the .xsession-errors file, > perhaps it can be related: > > (brasero:5849): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_range_set_range: assertion `min < max' > failed > > This bug happens quite often, if you need some help to debug it let me > know! > > Distro is Hardy up-to-date as of now. > > s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -rd > Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1 > Release:8.04 > > s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ apt-cache policy brasero > brasero: > Installed: 0.7.1-3ubuntu1 > Candidate: 0.7.1-3ubuntu1 > Version table: > *** 0.7.1-3ubuntu1 0 >500 http://sm.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages >100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > > Thanks! > -- Brasero: hangs during mp3 file loading https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249592 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 322449] [NEW] transmission-daemon doesn't consider settings.json
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: transmission-cli
Hi,
I've installed transmission-daemon on my machine in order to control it
from remote.
Everything works well but the fact that the settings.json configuration
file is not obeyed.
As a startup script, since it is missing from the ubuntu package, I've
used the suggested one
(http://trac.transmissionbt.com/wiki/Scripts/initd)
In my TRANSMISSION_HOME I've put the settings.json file, which has the
following content:
{
"rpc-enabled": 1,
"upload-limit-enabled": 1,
"upload-limit": 20,
"peer-port" : 9091,
"rpc-whitelist": "127.0.0.1",
}
What happens is that the upload rate limit is not obeyed. In particular,
Transmission seems to not read the file at all, since in the GUI I see
the unlimited setting. When I limit the upload rate using the GUI, it
works correctly.
s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 8.10
Release:8.10
transmission-cli:
Installed: 1.34-0ubuntu2.2
Candidate: 1.34-0ubuntu2.2
Version table:
*** 1.34-0ubuntu2.2 0
500 http://sm.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid-updates/universe Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1.34-0ubuntu2 0
500 http://sm.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/universe Packages
Thanks guys!
** Affects: transmission (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
transmission-daemon doesn't consider settings.json
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322449
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 322449] Re: transmission-daemon doesn't consider settings.json
One more note, just to be precise. The file is actually read, since the authentication settings work correctly (rpc-whitelist). -- transmission-daemon doesn't consider settings.json https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 298663] Re: nautilus process uses 100% CPU for 30 sec - 2 minutes on computer startup.
I think I have the same problem, constantly 40% to 50% nautilus usage, doing nothing. It seem related to a network share I have mounted. I found its name into a strace output. When I realized this, I've tried to access it from nautilus. After this access, CPU utilization went suddenly down. Hope this helps! -- nautilus process uses 100% CPU for 30 sec - 2 minutes on computer startup. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298663 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 322822] [NEW] nautilus cannot open desktop link to a share ("Could not display smb://)
Public bug reported:
Hi,
I've just noticed a weird behaviour of nautilus.
I have a network share to which I can connect successfully by opening
nautilus - for example from Computer - and then clicking on the bookmark
directory on the left bottom section.
When I'm connected, on the desktop there is an icon which is a shortcut
to the mounted share.
Sometimes, it happens that clicking on this icon shows the attached
error message.
Let me know if you need any other detail.
d...@sdoni-laptop-dev53:~$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 8.10
Release:8.10
d...@sdoni-laptop-dev53:~$ apt-cache policy nautilus
nautilus:
Installed: 1:2.24.1-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 1:2.24.1-0ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 1:2.24.1-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
nautilus cannot open desktop link to a share ("Could not display smb://)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322822
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 322822] Re: nautilus cannot open desktop link to a share ("Could not display smb://)
** Attachment added: "screenshot-nautilus.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21776671/screenshot-nautilus.png
--
nautilus cannot open desktop link to a share ("Could not display smb://)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322822
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 303691] Re: Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer
Hi, I'll test it. In every case, my problem is the pdftopdf file, which belongs to cups: d...@sdoni-laptop-dev53:~$ dpkg -S /usr/lib/cups/filter/pdftopdf cups: /usr/lib/cups/filter/pdftopdf So in other words, I can't reproduce the bug fixed with this last release. 2009/1/30 Martin Pitt > There is an updated version which fixes a regression: > > foomatic-filters (4.0.0-0ubuntu0.2) intrepid-proposed; urgency=low > . > * debian/patches/foomatic-rip-segfault-on-jcl-merging.patch: Fixed > segfault of the JCL merging process on long JCL command lists > (LP: #321164). This was also reported on the Intrepid SRU > 4.0.0-0ubuntu0.1 in LP: #318614. > > Can you please test this version instead/again, and report back here? > Thank you! > > ** Tags added: verification-needed > > ** Tags removed: verification-done > > -- > Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in "cups" source package in Ubuntu: In Progress > Status in "foomatic-filters" source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released > Status in cups in Ubuntu Intrepid: Triaged > Status in foomatic-filters in Ubuntu Intrepid: Fix Committed > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: foomatic-db > > Hi, >with Intrepid I can no longer print correctly with the said printer. > > In particular, what happens is that the page is printed, but the margins > are wrong. It seems that the page is printed with zoom, the fonts are huge > and the page does not fit the paper. Printing for example the ubuntu test > page, I see the top left corner aligned correctly, but I cannot see the > other three corners since the page is like zoomed. On the top right corner, > I see the ubuntu logo, and on the right paper edge I see the 50% label of > the various colors. > > One important fact I discovered is that this happens with the recommented > driver, which is Foomatic/ljet2p. If I choose the other avalable driver, > which is CUPS+Gutenprint v5.2.0-rc1, the printing is correct! > > Let me know if you need other info to track this down. Basically a single > test page print should be enough to determine if the bug is solved, since > currently the printed page doesn't fit the corners at all. > > p...@pier-laptop:~$ lsb_release -rd > Description:Ubuntu 8.10 > Release:8.10 > > p...@pier-laptop:~$ apt-cache policy foomatic-db > foomatic-db: > Installato: 20080918-0ubuntu4 > Candidato: 20080918-0ubuntu4 > Tabella versione: > *** 20080918-0ubuntu4 0 >500 http://archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages >100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > p...@pier-laptop:~$ > > > Thanks, and congrats on the great work! > Go ubuntu! > -- Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303691] Re: Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer
Guys, I've tested the last foomatic-filters. There is a problem, the output is a bit scrambled. Size is ok, but I find some weird chars at the top of the page, see attached pictures. I have checked if the previous test page is ok (when I told you that it was printing correctly), but I found them here too. They are small, I missed them since I was mainly looking at the page size, which were ok. I've tried to switch to the gutenprint drivers, just to see if they print correctly, and the do. Can this be a problem of the dummy pdftopdf filter? I don't remember to have ever had such a problem, previously. Thanks guys. ** Attachment added: "dsc00060-low.jpg" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21812275/dsc00060-low.jpg -- Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303691] Re: Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer
Even worst ** Attachment added: "dsc00061-low.jpg" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21812542/dsc00061-low.jpg -- Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303691] Re: Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer
Hello Tim, here are the results of your requests. a) Attached you can find a picture of the print of your output file. As you can see, it is not correct: 1) there are those weird chars 2) it is not vertically centered b) Yes, the paper I've used was blank c) How can I print some straight text to the printer? I've tried something like: cat /etc/hosts > /dev/lp0 but the printer keeps blinking with no printing at all d) Yes, the pdftopdf is the dummy one. Here it is: cat /usr/lib/cups/filter/pdftopdf #!/bin/sh cat $6 e) You can find in following attachments both the /tmp/printout and the error_log. f) I'm using a 32 bit system Thanks for the help. ** Attachment added: "DSC00070-low.JPG" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21850548/DSC00070-low.JPG -- Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303691] Re: Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer
Sorry Till, I keep messing with your name :( /tmp/printout ** Attachment added: "printout.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21850640/printout.gz -- Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303691] Re: Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer
cups error_log ** Attachment added: "error_log.1.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21850743/error_log.1.gz -- Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303691] Re: Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer
Till, sorry for the inconvenience. I've redone all the tests. To be sure about the results, I've configured five queues with distinctive names: - PagePro-8L-Gutenprint - PagePro-8L-ljet2p-300 - PagePro-8L-ljet2p-600 - PCL-4-Printer - debug (ljet2p, 600 DPI) I can confirm you that the problem is with the PagePro-8L-ljet2p, both 600 DPI and 300. Printing with the 300 DPI resolution, actually there is only a small black square dot near the top left, but the page is not centered correctly. Gutenprint is and has always been ok. Interesting news is that the PCL-4-Printer, with ljet2p, prints ok! Page well centered with no weird characters. You can find attached the new error_log. The test print is the Job 80. Also I attach the new printout, to the print debug. One important note, perhaps I haven't been clear about this point previusly. The previous print pictures I attached (DSC0070-low) was a direct cat output.pcl > /dev/lp0 of YOUR output.pcl, and it was BROKEN too (as you can see). ** Attachment added: "error_log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21884024/error_log -- Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303691] Re: Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer
** Attachment added: "printout" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21884061/printout -- Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303691] Re: Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer
Let me know if you want me to perform some other tests with the pdftopdf filter that you attached -- Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 322822] Re: nautilus cannot open desktop link to a share ("Could not display smb://)
Hello Sebastien,
I don't actually know what is causing this.
Now I've tried to open the share and I get the error. Even after reopening
the share and exploring it inside the nautilus window, I continue to get the
error (if I click on the bookmark, the connection is always successfull).
Let me know if there is some log to consult in order to track this down!
I've tried to sniff the network, but I don't see any package generated when
I click on the icon. If I open the share clicking on the bookmark, instead,
I obviously see traffic flowing.
2009/2/2 Sebastien Bacher
> thank you for your bug report, do you have steps to trigger the issue?
> does it happen after some time? could be the mount which is timeouting?
>
> ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
> Importance: Undecided => Low
> Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)
> Status: New => Incomplete
>
> --
> nautilus cannot open desktop link to a share ("Could not display smb://)
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322822
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in "nautilus" source package in Ubuntu: Incomplete
>
> Bug description:
> Hi,
> I've just noticed a weird behaviour of nautilus.
>
> I have a network share to which I can connect successfully by opening
> nautilus - for example from Computer - and then clicking on the bookmark
> directory on the left bottom section.
>
> When I'm connected, on the desktop there is an icon which is a shortcut to
> the mounted share.
>
> Sometimes, it happens that clicking on this icon shows the attached error
> message.
>
> Let me know if you need any other detail.
>
> d...@sdoni-laptop-dev53:~$ lsb_release -rd
> Description:Ubuntu 8.10
> Release:8.10
>
> d...@sdoni-laptop-dev53:~$ apt-cache policy nautilus
> nautilus:
> Installed: 1:2.24.1-0ubuntu1
> Candidate: 1:2.24.1-0ubuntu1
> Version table:
> *** 1:2.24.1-0ubuntu1 0
>500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages
>100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
>
--
nautilus cannot open desktop link to a share ("Could not display smb://)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322822
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159065] Re: Alarm does not work properly
Guys, I finally sorted out this one. This was a problem of password. My Exchange account is password protected (ovbiously), and I didn't let Evolution remember my password. Now I've chosen to remember the pwd, and suddenly alarms are working! Solved for me. -- Alarm does not work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159065 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 249592] Re: Brasero: hangs during mp3 file loading
Good, so when will we see this in intrepid repos? SRU? To me the bug is critical, every time I have to do some mp3 compilations, I need to switch to k3b. 2009/2/3 Guglielmo Cola > Backported version fixed the bug in Intrepid. > Thanks! > > -- > Brasero: hangs during mp3 file loading > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249592 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in A disc burning application for gnome 2: Fix Released > Status in "brasero" source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: brasero > > Hi, > bug regarding Brasero. > > I choose to make an Audio CD. Browse my mp3, select a set of them, drag & > drop them into the right frame in order to import them. > > Brasero start to load them correctly, but sometimes it hangs forever in a > state where some mp3s have been loaded and others not. > > I've noticed one interesting thing though, in the .xsession-errors file, > perhaps it can be related: > > (brasero:5849): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_range_set_range: assertion `min < max' > failed > > This bug happens quite often, if you need some help to debug it let me > know! > > Distro is Hardy up-to-date as of now. > > s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -rd > Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1 > Release:8.04 > > s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ apt-cache policy brasero > brasero: > Installed: 0.7.1-3ubuntu1 > Candidate: 0.7.1-3ubuntu1 > Version table: > *** 0.7.1-3ubuntu1 0 >500 http://sm.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages >100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > > Thanks! > -- Brasero: hangs during mp3 file loading https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249592 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 249592] Re: Brasero: hangs during mp3 file loading
Do you mean into backports? If so, this is not the solution, we are leaving all Intrepid users with the buggy version. I would prefer an update to the main repos. 2009/2/3 mirage > Well, it's available now on intrepid, > > => 0.9.1-0ubuntu2~intrepid1 > > stek79 wrote: > > Good, > > so when will we see this in intrepid repos? > > > > SRU? > > > > To me the bug is critical, every time I have to do some mp3 compilations, > I > > need to switch to k3b. > > > > 2009/2/3 Guglielmo Cola > > > > > >> Backported version fixed the bug in Intrepid. > >> Thanks! > >> > >> -- > >> Brasero: hangs during mp3 file loading > >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249592 > >> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > >> of the bug. > >> > >> Status in A disc burning application for gnome 2: Fix Released > >> Status in "brasero" source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released > >> > >> Bug description: > >> Binary package hint: brasero > >> > >> Hi, > >> bug regarding Brasero. > >> > >> I choose to make an Audio CD. Browse my mp3, select a set of them, drag > & > >> drop them into the right frame in order to import them. > >> > >> Brasero start to load them correctly, but sometimes it hangs forever in > a > >> state where some mp3s have been loaded and others not. > >> > >> I've noticed one interesting thing though, in the .xsession-errors file, > >> perhaps it can be related: > >> > >> (brasero:5849): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_range_set_range: assertion `min < > max' > >> failed > >> > >> This bug happens quite often, if you need some help to debug it let me > >> know! > >> > >> Distro is Hardy up-to-date as of now. > >> > >> s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -rd > >> Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1 > >> Release:8.04 > >> > >> s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ apt-cache policy brasero > >> brasero: > >> Installed: 0.7.1-3ubuntu1 > >> Candidate: 0.7.1-3ubuntu1 > >> Version table: > >> *** 0.7.1-3ubuntu1 0 > >>500 http://sm.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages > >>100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > Brasero: hangs during mp3 file loading > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249592 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in A disc burning application for gnome 2: Fix Released > Status in "brasero" source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: brasero > > Hi, > bug regarding Brasero. > > I choose to make an Audio CD. Browse my mp3, select a set of them, drag & > drop them into the right frame in order to import them. > > Brasero start to load them correctly, but sometimes it hangs forever in a > state where some mp3s have been loaded and others not. > > I've noticed one interesting thing though, in the .xsession-errors file, > perhaps it can be related: > > (brasero:5849): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_range_set_range: assertion `min < max' > failed > > This bug happens quite often, if you need some help to debug it let me > know! > > Distro is Hardy up-to-date as of now. > > s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -rd > Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1 > Release:8.04 > > s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ apt-cache policy brasero > brasero: > Installed: 0.7.1-3ubuntu1 > Candidate: 0.7.1-3ubuntu1 > Version table: > *** 0.7.1-3ubuntu1 0 >500 http://sm.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages >100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > > Thanks! > -- Brasero: hangs during mp3 file loading https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249592 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333836] Re: pidgin, save file wizard broken
** Attachment added: "pidgin-bug.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23053395/pidgin-bug.png -- pidgin, save file wizard broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 333836] [NEW] pidgin, save file wizard broken
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pidgin Hi, today a friend sent me a file via pidgin chat. Too bad I wasn't able to save it into my desktop, since pidgin wizard is somewhat broken, it has some white entries and no Desktop link. See attached screenshot. lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 8.10 Release:8.10 ** Affects: pidgin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- pidgin, save file wizard broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333836 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 339839] [NEW] Evolution, ampersand in subject makes a mail disappear!
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution Hi, I finally figured out a what seems to me critical bug about evolution. Since when I migrated to Ubuntu I've noticed that some received mails just happen to disappear when I click on them to see the body. A friend told me that evolution is known to be affected by a serious bug, and actually it was the bug I was experiencing! It is very simple to reproduce: simply send a mail with an ampersand in the subject. Receive it with evolution and try to read it. I'll discover that the mail just can't be read, since it disappears as you click on it. I hope it will be fixed soon, we've lost tracking of important mails due to this bug. Description:Ubuntu 8.10 Release:8.10 evolution: Installed: 2.24.3-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.24.3-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.24.3-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.24.1-0ubuntu2 0 500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Evolution, ampersand in subject makes a mail disappear! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339839 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 339839] Re: Evolution, ampersand in subject makes a mail disappear!
Hello Sebastien, I' using an exchange account. When I click on the email, for a fraction of a second I can see the following message appear in the main windows: Unable to retrieve message Message has been deleted I've checked my .xession-errors but no log entry is done when the problem occurs. I've not checked gnome bug tracking system, if you want I can have a look. Thanks 2009/3/9 Sebastien Bacher > thank you for your bug report, what account type do you use (imap, pop, > etc)? do you get any warning on the command line when getting the issue? > do you get the issue with all the emails using that char? do you know if > there is an upstream bug about the issue somewhere? > > ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) > Importance: Undecided => Low > Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) > Status: New => Incomplete > > -- > Evolution, ampersand in subject makes a mail disappear! > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339839 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in “evolution” source package in Ubuntu: Incomplete > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: evolution > > Hi, > I finally figured out a what seems to me critical bug about evolution. > > Since when I migrated to Ubuntu I've noticed that some received mails just > happen to disappear when I click on them to see the body. > > A friend told me that evolution is known to be affected by a serious bug, > and actually it was the bug I was experiencing! > > It is very simple to reproduce: simply send a mail with an ampersand in the > subject. Receive it with evolution and try to read it. I'll discover that > the mail just can't be read, since it disappears as you click on it. > > I hope it will be fixed soon, we've lost tracking of important mails due to > this bug. > > Description:Ubuntu 8.10 > Release:8.10 > > evolution: > Installed: 2.24.3-0ubuntu1 > Candidate: 2.24.3-0ubuntu1 > Version table: > *** 2.24.3-0ubuntu1 0 >500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid-updates/main Packages >100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 2.24.1-0ubuntu2 0 >500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages > -- Evolution, ampersand in subject makes a mail disappear! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339839 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 314362] Re: Intrepid kernel lockup
Update, I just experimented another lockup. This time it happened just removing the USB wireless lan, which uses zd1211rw driver. It does not happen every time I do it, though. Let me know if I can do anything. -- Intrepid kernel lockup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267828] Re: switch user does not work
Hi, same problem here. Here are the steps to reproduce it: 1) boot the system 2) login with user A 3) choose user B from the user switcher applet Bang, the error comes out. Note that it happens only the first time after boot, subsequent switch between users work correctly. s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 8.10 Release:8.10 ** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21285281/lspci-vvnn.log -- switch user does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267828 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159065] Re: Alarm does not work properly
Same problem here, we have migrated some PCs from Win to Intrepid, fresh install. Evolution with Exchange connector, meetings set in calendar but never seen any alarm! -- Alarm does not work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159065 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159065] Re: Alarm does not work properly
Update guys, now the alarms are working! Yesterday I've done two changes: 1) Enabled alerts, which were off by default. Check Evolution Preferences -> Calendar & Tasks -> Alerts -> Show a reminder... 2) When I received a calender, I clicked on the showed combo box and choosed "Import to calendar" 3) Clicked Accept I'm not sure if the second action is actually useful, previously I just clicked Accept but no alarm fired. After the change (Enabled alerts), yesterday I tried to create a fake appointment, but not alarm fired again. Today, just after booting my pc, I was pleased to watch my first Evolution alarm, alerting me of an imminent meeting! So I can say that now the alarms works for me, I suggest to try the mentioned steps! Bye! -- Alarm does not work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159065 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 328621] [NEW] Evolution: echange email auto completion suddenly stops working
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution-exchange Hi, I'm using Evolution with Exchange server in our organization. What I'm finding is that, at random times, evolution email auto- completion stops working. I start typing some email addresses, but it doesn't complete them. The only remedy is to close and restart evolution. I tried sniffing network traffic and I found something interesting. The exchange server actually provides some reply but evolution-exchange don't read the data. The socket queue is filled, and netstat reports high RECVQ. Also from tcpdump I see a zero windows annouced from my PC, meaning that the socket queue is full but the application process don't read it. It is very likely that during such issues evolution-exchange hangs for some reason. $ apt-cache policy evolution-exchange evolution-exchange: Installed: 2.24.3-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.24.3-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.24.3-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.24.1-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages Description:Ubuntu 8.10 Release:8.10 ** Affects: evolution-exchange (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Evolution: echange email auto completion suddenly stops working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 328621] Re: Evolution: exchange email auto completion suddenly stops working
** Summary changed: - Evolution: echange email auto completion suddenly stops working + Evolution: exchange email auto completion suddenly stops working -- Evolution: exchange email auto completion suddenly stops working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 216878] Re: [regression]Slow disk transfer rate on Hardy
Hello Zhang,
this is a common issue, and is not related to Linux.
It is important to understand the testing that we're doing and how a
rotational disk works.
hdparm test the _sequential_ transfer speed, which is the speed at which
data can be transferred from sequential sectors.
Real life data transfer can be much lower indeed - as you've measured -
since disks are mechanical parts, they have a moving arm inside. This
implies that if your workload is random (as opposed to sequential), you end
up with another bottleneck, which is arm movement. This slows down your
throughput to 5 MB/s.
If you generate a pure random workload for your disk, you'll see that you
can barely reach 1-2 MB/s! You can try that issuing a:
$ find / -ls > /dev/null
and watching disk stats with
# iostat -x 10
Bye!
2009/2/15 ZhangInSeattle
> My situation might be related to this bug:
>
> I bought a Thinkpad T61 in last October. I erased Vista and installed
> Ubuntu 8.7 and later upgraded to 8.10. The disk speed seemed slow. I
> tried the following command to test the real read speed:
>
> $ date; cp a_100_MB_file /dev/null; date;
>
> The copying takes about 20 seconds. So the speed is about 5MB/sec.
>
> But when I try to use hdparm to test the read speed, the result is like
> this:
>
> $ sudo hdparm -t /dev/sda
>
> /dev/sda:
> Timing buffered disk reads: 130 MB in 3.03 seconds = 42.84 MB/sec
>
> Can anybody tell me why the real read speed is far from the 42.84MB/sec?
>
> --
> [regression]Slow disk transfer rate on Hardy
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216878
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in "linux" source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
>
> Bug description:
> Hi,
> upgrading from Gutsy to Hardy I've seen a considerable HD transfer rate
> slowdown.
>
> I have a machine with two IDE disks, both are udma5 capable. In Gutsy, they
> were recognised as 'hd[ab]' and I with hdparm sequential thoughput was:
>
> /dev/hdb:
> Timing buffered disk reads: 172 MB in 3.01 seconds = 57.19 MB/sec
>
> which is quite correct for that kind of drive.
>
> In Hardy, they are recognized as 'sd[ab]', and the performance regarding
> transfer rate is LESS THAN HALF:
>
> /dev/sdb:
> Timing buffered disk reads: 78 MB in 3.01 seconds = 25.92 MB/sec
>
> That slowdown is visible also during file transfer operations, obviously.
> One thing I've noticed is that in the dmesg, my drive is set at UDMA/33, and
> also hdparm reports that udma2 is currently configured:
>
> sudo hdparm -i /dev/sdb
>
> /dev/sdb:
>
> Model=WDC WD2500JB-00GVC0 , FwRev=08.02D08, SerialNo=
> WD-WCAL78023606
> Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec SpinMotCtl Fixed DTR>5Mbs FmtGapReq }
> RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=57600, SectSize=600, ECCbytes=74
> BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=8192kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=?16?
> CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=488397168
> IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:120,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
> PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
> DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
> UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 *udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5
> AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled
> Drive conforms to: Unspecified: ATA/ATAPI-1,2,3,4,5,6
>
> * signifies the current active mode
>
> I've seen a number of users complaining about that, a number of bugs with
> status Incomplete or Release Fixed. I can say that with the latest Hardy
> patches (as of now), the problem is still there. Will that be fixed before
> the final release? If not, that can be a huge performance penalty!
>
> Here are some infos. I'm willing to help to solve the problem, just ask if
> you need any info.
> s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -rd
> Description:Ubuntu hardy (development branch)
> Release:8.04
>
> Pertinent dmesg output:
>
> [ 35.085132] libata version 3.00 loaded.
> [ 35.460830] pata_via :00:11.1: version 0.3.3
> [ 35.463781] scsi0 : pata_via
> [ 35.465345] scsi1 : pata_via
> [ 35.465441] ata1: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x1f0 ctl 0x3f6 bmdma 0xcc00 irq
> 14
> [ 35.465446] ata2: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xcc08 irq
> 15
> [ 35.637026] ata1.00: ATA-6: Maxtor 5T030H3, TAH71DP0, max UDMA/100
> [ 35.637034] ata1.00: 60030432 sectors, multi 16: LBA
> [ 35.638417] ata1.01: ATA-6: WDC WD2500JB-00GVC0, 08.02D08, max UDMA/100
> [ 35.638424] ata1.01: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48
> [ 35.638446] ata1.00: limited to UDMA/33 due to 40-wire cable
> [ 35.638450] ata1.01: limited to UDMA/33 due to 40-wire cable
> [ 35.652916] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33
> [ 35.669962] ata1.01: configured for UDMA/33
> [ 36.136471] ata2.00: ATAPI: LG DVD-ROM DRD-8160B, 1.01, max
> UDMA/33
> [ 36.136502] ata2.01: ATAPI: HL-DT-ST GCE-8160B, 1.02, max MWDMA2
> [ 36.300210] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/33
> [ 36.464034] ata2.01: configured for MWDMA2
> [ 36.464239] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA Maxtor 5T030H3
> TAH7 PQ: 0
Re: [Bug 216878] Re: [regression]Slow disk transfer rate on Hardy
Hi Zhang,
you're welcome.
It is actually possible to get very high performance from SATA disks,
comparable to those of SAS or SCSI, by using a technique called
short-stroking.
If you understand the mechanics of the disks, you can actually build a
system with very low latency. You can get this by placing the most accessed
files on the outer zone of your disk, thus getting the max rotational speed
and reducing head movement.
This way you can greatly reduce the arm movement and get higher throughputs!
:)
2009/2/16 ZhangInSeattle
> Hi Stek79,
>
> Thanks for your reply!
>
> I understand the hdparm result is the best possible speed. But the
> difference between 42.84MB/sec and 5MB/sec still shocked me.
> It kinda implied that the file system (I'm using ext3) needs more
> optimization to store big files in the way the hard disk can sequentially
> read (with minimum arm movement). (I don't know much about ext3, maybe it
> did the optimization already).
>
> My laptop (thinkpad t61) is purchased in October 2008. It has a SATA
> disk. It should have a much better performance than 5MB/sec imho :-)
>
>
> Thanks!
> ZhangInSeattle
>
> --
> [regression]Slow disk transfer rate on Hardy
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216878
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in "linux" source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
>
> Bug description:
> Hi,
> upgrading from Gutsy to Hardy I've seen a considerable HD transfer rate
> slowdown.
>
> I have a machine with two IDE disks, both are udma5 capable. In Gutsy, they
> were recognised as 'hd[ab]' and I with hdparm sequential thoughput was:
>
> /dev/hdb:
> Timing buffered disk reads: 172 MB in 3.01 seconds = 57.19 MB/sec
>
> which is quite correct for that kind of drive.
>
> In Hardy, they are recognized as 'sd[ab]', and the performance regarding
> transfer rate is LESS THAN HALF:
>
> /dev/sdb:
> Timing buffered disk reads: 78 MB in 3.01 seconds = 25.92 MB/sec
>
> That slowdown is visible also during file transfer operations, obviously.
> One thing I've noticed is that in the dmesg, my drive is set at UDMA/33, and
> also hdparm reports that udma2 is currently configured:
>
> sudo hdparm -i /dev/sdb
>
> /dev/sdb:
>
> Model=WDC WD2500JB-00GVC0 , FwRev=08.02D08, SerialNo=
> WD-WCAL78023606
> Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec SpinMotCtl Fixed DTR>5Mbs FmtGapReq }
> RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=57600, SectSize=600, ECCbytes=74
> BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=8192kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=?16?
> CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=488397168
> IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:120,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
> PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
> DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
> UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 *udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5
> AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled
> Drive conforms to: Unspecified: ATA/ATAPI-1,2,3,4,5,6
>
> * signifies the current active mode
>
> I've seen a number of users complaining about that, a number of bugs with
> status Incomplete or Release Fixed. I can say that with the latest Hardy
> patches (as of now), the problem is still there. Will that be fixed before
> the final release? If not, that can be a huge performance penalty!
>
> Here are some infos. I'm willing to help to solve the problem, just ask if
> you need any info.
> s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -rd
> Description:Ubuntu hardy (development branch)
> Release:8.04
>
> Pertinent dmesg output:
>
> [ 35.085132] libata version 3.00 loaded.
> [ 35.460830] pata_via :00:11.1: version 0.3.3
> [ 35.463781] scsi0 : pata_via
> [ 35.465345] scsi1 : pata_via
> [ 35.465441] ata1: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x1f0 ctl 0x3f6 bmdma 0xcc00 irq
> 14
> [ 35.465446] ata2: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xcc08 irq
> 15
> [ 35.637026] ata1.00: ATA-6: Maxtor 5T030H3, TAH71DP0, max UDMA/100
> [ 35.637034] ata1.00: 60030432 sectors, multi 16: LBA
> [ 35.638417] ata1.01: ATA-6: WDC WD2500JB-00GVC0, 08.02D08, max UDMA/100
> [ 35.638424] ata1.01: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48
> [ 35.638446] ata1.00: limited to UDMA/33 due to 40-wire cable
> [ 35.638450] ata1.01: limited to UDMA/33 due to 40-wire cable
> [ 35.652916] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33
> [ 35.669962] ata1.01: configured for UDMA/33
> [ 36.136471] ata2.00: ATAPI: LG DVD-ROM DRD-8160B, 1.01, max
> UDMA/33
> [ 36.136502] ata2.01: ATAPI: HL-DT-ST GCE-8160B, 1.02, max MWDMA2
> [ 36.300210] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/33
> [ 36.464034] ata2.01: configured for MWDMA2
> [ 36.464239] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-A
Re: [Bug 339839] Re: Evolution, ampersand in subject makes a mail disappear!
Guys, I've verified that this problem is not related to evolution at all. It is an OWA bug! Same problem accessing my web mail! So you can close this bug, Exchange is the real culprit here. 2009/3/9 Pedro Villavicencio > Leaving an upstream task open, for forwarding instructions please have a > look to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Upstream/GNOME ; thanks in advance. > > ** Also affects: evolution-exchange >Importance: Undecided > Status: New > > -- > Evolution, ampersand in subject makes a mail disappear! > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339839 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in Evolution Exchange - Exchange Plugin for Exchange: New > Status in “evolution-exchange” source package in Ubuntu: New > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: evolution > > Hi, > I finally figured out a what seems to me critical bug about evolution. > > Since when I migrated to Ubuntu I've noticed that some received mails just > happen to disappear when I click on them to see the body. > > A friend told me that evolution is known to be affected by a serious bug, > and actually it was the bug I was experiencing! > > It is very simple to reproduce: simply send a mail with an ampersand in the > subject. Receive it with evolution and try to read it. I'll discover that > the mail just can't be read, since it disappears as you click on it. > > I hope it will be fixed soon, we've lost tracking of important mails due to > this bug. > > Description:Ubuntu 8.10 > Release:8.10 > > evolution: > Installed: 2.24.3-0ubuntu1 > Candidate: 2.24.3-0ubuntu1 > Version table: > *** 2.24.3-0ubuntu1 0 >500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid-updates/main Packages >100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 2.24.1-0ubuntu2 0 >500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages > -- Evolution, ampersand in subject makes a mail disappear! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339839 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303691] Re: Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer
Upgraded cups, foomatic-filters was already ok. Printing is correct now, thanks for the good work! Bye -- Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 216878] Re: [regression]Slow disk transfer rate on Hardy
Hi,
it all depends on the benchmark.
How do you plan to reproduce on Windows?
If you take a look at recent benchmarks, you'll see that Ubuntu performs
faster here:
http://www.tuxradar.com/content/benchmarked-ubuntu-vs-vista-vs-windows-7
Let me know which kind of test you've done and what are the results.
I kind of live by the
> rule that if there is even one exception to the hypothesis that you need a
> new hypothesis :)
I agree! But it is imperative to perform a sound benchmarking, it is not
easy as it seems.
>
>
> I will let you know what I find out and appreciate the other comments you
> passed along. BTW, not sure that if you booted from the live disk that
> will
> count as an accurate test. I get 1-2 mb throughput going to a USB so why
> should we see nearly that internal?
>
> Also would note that I have have seen many, many threads on this and have
> even seen (not sure I can place it now) the Ubuntu team admit that there is
> an issue.
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:38 PM, ZhangInSeattle
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks stat!
> >
> > Yes, I used the upgrade tool to install Ibex..
> >
> > Did you try to do a clean install and fix the issue?
> >
> > (I remember that I tried to boot from the clean 8.10 CD and mount the
> > same disk to test the speed. The speed is the same as I boot from my
> > hard drive. So it seemed the clean install might not work for me. Anyway
> > I'd like to hear if you succeeded.)
> >
> > --
> > [regression]Slow disk transfer rate on Hardy
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216878
> > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> > of the bug.
> >
> > Status in "linux" source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
> >
> > Bug description:
> > Hi,
> > upgrading from Gutsy to Hardy I've seen a considerable HD transfer
> rate
> > slowdown.
> >
> > I have a machine with two IDE disks, both are udma5 capable. In Gutsy,
> they
> > were recognised as 'hd[ab]' and I with hdparm sequential thoughput was:
> >
> > /dev/hdb:
> > Timing buffered disk reads: 172 MB in 3.01 seconds = 57.19 MB/sec
> >
> > which is quite correct for that kind of drive.
> >
> > In Hardy, they are recognized as 'sd[ab]', and the performance regarding
> > transfer rate is LESS THAN HALF:
> >
> > /dev/sdb:
> > Timing buffered disk reads: 78 MB in 3.01 seconds = 25.92 MB/sec
> >
> > That slowdown is visible also during file transfer operations, obviously.
> > One thing I've noticed is that in the dmesg, my drive is set at UDMA/33,
> and
> > also hdparm reports that udma2 is currently configured:
> >
> > sudo hdparm -i /dev/sdb
> >
> > /dev/sdb:
> >
> > Model=WDC WD2500JB-00GVC0 , FwRev=08.02D08,
> SerialNo=
> > WD-WCAL78023606
> > Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec SpinMotCtl Fixed DTR>5Mbs FmtGapReq
> }
> > RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=57600, SectSize=600, ECCbytes=74
> > BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=8192kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=?16?
> > CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=488397168
> > IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:120,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
> > PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
> > DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
> > UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 *udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5
> > AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled
> > Drive conforms to: Unspecified: ATA/ATAPI-1,2,3,4,5,6
> >
> > * signifies the current active mode
> >
> > I've seen a number of users complaining about that, a number of bugs with
> > status Incomplete or Release Fixed. I can say that with the latest Hardy
> > patches (as of now), the problem is still there. Will that be fixed
> before
> > the final release? If not, that can be a huge performance penalty!
> >
> > Here are some infos. I'm willing to help to solve the problem, just ask
> if
> > you need any info.
> > s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -rd
> > Description:Ubuntu hardy (development branch)
> > Release:8.04
> >
> > Pertinent dmesg output:
> >
> > [ 35.085132] libata version 3.00 loaded.
> > [ 35.460830] pata_via :00:11.1: version 0.3.3
> > [ 35.463781] scsi0 : pata_via
> > [ 35.465345] scsi1 : pata_via
> > [ 35.465441] ata1: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x1f0 ctl 0x3f6 bmdma 0xcc00
> irq
> > 14
> > [ 35.465446] ata2: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xcc08
> irq
> > 15
> > [ 35.637026] ata1.00: ATA-6: Maxtor 5T030H3, TAH71DP0, max UDMA/100
> > [ 35.637034] ata1.00: 60030432 sectors, multi 16: LBA
> > [ 35.638417] ata1.01: ATA-6: WDC WD2500JB-00GVC0, 08.02D08, max
> UDMA/100
> > [ 35.638424] ata1.01: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48
> > [ 35.638446] ata1.00: limited to UDMA/33 due to 40-wire cable
> > [ 35.638450] ata1.01: limited to UDMA/33 due to 40-wire cable
> > [ 35.652916] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33
> > [ 35.669962] ata1.01: configured for UDMA/33
> > [ 36.136471] ata2.00: ATAPI: LG DVD-ROM DRD-8160B, 1.01, max
> > UDMA/33
> > [ 36.136502] ata2.01: ATAPI: HL-DT-ST GCE-8160B, 1.02, max MWDMA2
> > [ 36.300210] ata2.00: config
Re: [Bug 216878] Re: [regression]Slow disk transfer rate on Hardy
Hi stat, I'm looking forward to see the results! Only suggestions is that perhaps this is not the right place to publish them, maybe a blog post is more appropriate. Have fun with the benchmarking :) 2009/2/18 stat > HI: > > I agree it isn't all that easy but since I have the machines to play around > with I am going to take my main machine (the one I am experiencing the > issues with and install Win 7 and then use the Richard's python script > (cross platform) as described on the site you linked to. It is pretty > funny > since I had created an outline of what I was going to do from the very site > you mentioned, what are the odds. I already have just about everything put > together. The difference for me of course will be that I will be using my > 8.1 install as is and will perform those tests first (excluding the install > tests) and then redoing them using Win 7 and the same hardware. I have all > the tools I need including using a couple of Aspire ones and a DNS-323 that > I will use to measure throughput externally. I believe that by following > what they did on Tuxradar, connecting some separate machine tests etc. I > should be able to get a true test and relatively close to the true picture > of things. > > Once it is done I will post somewhere (here?) my steps and what results I > got. If my plan is flawed let me know, I am open to listen and am hoping > to > get this done this weekend (it's good to be a lonely geek :) Kind of > looking forward to this, despite the work it entails and the fact that I > will have to turn my xbmc box into a production machine temporarily :( > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:41 PM, stek79 wrote: > > > Hi, > > it all depends on the benchmark. > > > > How do you plan to reproduce on Windows? > > > > If you take a look at recent benchmarks, you'll see that Ubuntu performs > > faster here: > > > > http://www.tuxradar.com/content/benchmarked-ubuntu-vs-vista-vs-windows-7 > > > > Let me know which kind of test you've done and what are the results. > > > > I kind of live by the > > > rule that if there is even one exception to the hypothesis that you > need > > a > > > new hypothesis :) > > > > > > I agree! But it is imperative to perform a sound benchmarking, it is not > > easy as it seems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will let you know what I find out and appreciate the other comments > you > > > passed along. BTW, not sure that if you booted from the live disk that > > > will > > > count as an accurate test. I get 1-2 mb throughput going to a USB so > why > > > should we see nearly that internal? > > > > > > Also would note that I have have seen many, many threads on this and > have > > > even seen (not sure I can place it now) the Ubuntu team admit that > there > > is > > > an issue. > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:38 PM, ZhangInSeattle > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks stat! > > > > > > > > Yes, I used the upgrade tool to install Ibex.. > > > > > > > > Did you try to do a clean install and fix the issue? > > > > > > > > (I remember that I tried to boot from the clean 8.10 CD and mount the > > > > same disk to test the speed. The speed is the same as I boot from my > > > > hard drive. So it seemed the clean install might not work for me. > > Anyway > > > > I'd like to hear if you succeeded.) > > > > > > > > -- > > > > [regression]Slow disk transfer rate on Hardy > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216878 > > > > You received this bug notification because you are a direct > subscriber > > > > of the bug. > > > > > > > > Status in "linux" source package in Ubuntu: Triaged > > > > > > > > Bug description: > > > > Hi, > > > > upgrading from Gutsy to Hardy I've seen a considerable HD > transfer > > > rate > > > > slowdown. > > > > > > > > I have a machine with two IDE disks, both are udma5 capable. In > Gutsy, > > > they > > > > were recognised as 'hd[ab]' and I with hdparm sequential thoughput > was: > > > > > > > > /dev/hdb: > > > > Timing buffered disk reads: 172 MB in 3.01 seconds = 57.19 MB/sec > > > > > > > > which is quite correct for that kind of drive. > > > > > > > > In Hardy, t
[Bug 314546] Re: file-roller shows random filesize for zero bytes files
Hello guys, I'm having the same problem too. See attached screenshot, it is a gz containing an empty file. ** Attachment added: "file-roller-bug.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22943158/file-roller-bug.png -- file-roller shows random filesize for zero bytes files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314546 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303691] Re: Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer
Till, I confirm you that now the printing is ok! I've printed a test page along with another image, and they are ok. Great work! Consider this bug as successfully closed. Thanks again. -- Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 303691] Re: Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer
Ok Till, I'm happy that we finally sorted this out! Just let me know when the new packages will be ready, I'll be glad to test them! Have a nice week-end! 2009/2/6 Till Kamppeter > stek79, thank you for confirming that all relevant bugs in foomatic- > filters are now fixed. > > The SRU on foomatic-filters is completed and verified now. The package > can be moved to -updates. > > Note that this bug report has still to be open as an SRU request for > CUPS, as the proposed SRU with the fix in the pdftopdf filter has not > yet arrived in -proposed. So, stek79, please stay tuned for the next > CUPS upload into -proposed. We will inform you on this bug report and > ask you test then to see whether the patch has really made it into the > enew package and other fixes in it will not break your printing. Even if > you are already able to print now with the new foomatic-filters and my > pdftopdf binary, we will also need your confirmation on the new CUPS > package. Thank you in advance. > > -- > Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in "cups" source package in Ubuntu: In Progress > Status in "foomatic-filters" source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released > Status in cups in Ubuntu Intrepid: In Progress > Status in foomatic-filters in Ubuntu Intrepid: Fix Committed > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: foomatic-db > > Hi, >with Intrepid I can no longer print correctly with the said printer. > > In particular, what happens is that the page is printed, but the margins > are wrong. It seems that the page is printed with zoom, the fonts are huge > and the page does not fit the paper. Printing for example the ubuntu test > page, I see the top left corner aligned correctly, but I cannot see the > other three corners since the page is like zoomed. On the top right corner, > I see the ubuntu logo, and on the right paper edge I see the 50% label of > the various colors. > > One important fact I discovered is that this happens with the recommented > driver, which is Foomatic/ljet2p. If I choose the other avalable driver, > which is CUPS+Gutenprint v5.2.0-rc1, the printing is correct! > > Let me know if you need other info to track this down. Basically a single > test page print should be enough to determine if the bug is solved, since > currently the printed page doesn't fit the corners at all. > > p...@pier-laptop:~$ lsb_release -rd > Description:Ubuntu 8.10 > Release:8.10 > > p...@pier-laptop:~$ apt-cache policy foomatic-db > foomatic-db: > Installato: 20080918-0ubuntu4 > Candidato: 20080918-0ubuntu4 > Tabella versione: > *** 20080918-0ubuntu4 0 >500 http://archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages >100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > p...@pier-laptop:~$ > > > Thanks, and congrats on the great work! > Go ubuntu! > -- Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303691] Re: Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer
Hi Till, I've experienced twice an error during printing. It is not a matter of image corruption, but in those times the printer did not print at all. A small windows told me "too many failed attempts". I attach the error_log, it seems to be a Bad Request problem. Please note that they're pretty random. For example, now I've turned on the laptop to print a document. I got the error. Then I printed again, and it worked. Can this be related to the applied changes? It looks like a different issue. ** Attachment added: "error_log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22420745/error_log -- Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317490] Re: gnome-power-statistics seems to stop data graph
** Attachment added: "gpm.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24038199/gpm.log -- gnome-power-statistics seems to stop data graph https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317490 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354507] [NEW] Pidgin crashes multiple times a day
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pidgin Suddenly pidgin crashes, even multiple times a day. Distro is Ubuntu 8.10 Some times during chat, some times even when I'm not actively using it. Here what I found in my .xsession-errors: ***MEMORY-ERROR***: pidgin[5971]: GSlice: failed to allocate 248 bytes (alignment: 256): Cannot allocate memory lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 8.10 Release:8.10 apt-cache policy pidgin pidgin: Installed: 1:2.5.2-0ubuntu1.1 Candidate: 1:2.5.2-0ubuntu1.1 Version table: *** 1:2.5.2-0ubuntu1.1 0 500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:2.5.2-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages Let me know what can I do to solve this. ** Affects: pidgin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Pidgin crashes multiple times a day https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354507 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 354507] Re: Pidgin crashes multiple times a day
Pedro, I launched pidgin with valgrind as per directions. While using it, it suddenly became unresponsive. Typical white and grey window, no more text or anything rendered. Pidgin icon disappeared from the gnome menu. After a while, I killed it. Please find attached the collected valgrind report, it seems that several memory leaks are present. Let me know if this is useful! 2009/4/3 Pedro Villavicencio > Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make > Ubuntu better. Please try to obtain a valgrind log following the > instructions at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Valgrind and attach the file to > the bug report. This will greatly help us in tracking down your problem. > > ** Changed in: pidgin (Ubuntu) > Importance: Undecided => Medium > > ** Changed in: pidgin (Ubuntu) > Status: New => Incomplete > > -- > Pidgin crashes multiple times a day > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354507 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in “pidgin” source package in Ubuntu: Incomplete > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: pidgin > > Suddenly pidgin crashes, even multiple times a day. Distro is Ubuntu 8.10 > > Some times during chat, some times even when I'm not actively using it. > > Here what I found in my .xsession-errors: > > ***MEMORY-ERROR***: pidgin[5971]: GSlice: failed to allocate 248 bytes > (alignment: 256): Cannot allocate memory > > > lsb_release -rd > Description:Ubuntu 8.10 > Release:8.10 > > > apt-cache policy pidgin > pidgin: > Installed: 1:2.5.2-0ubuntu1.1 > Candidate: 1:2.5.2-0ubuntu1.1 > Version table: > *** 1:2.5.2-0ubuntu1.1 0 >500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid-updates/main Packages >100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 1:2.5.2-0ubuntu1 0 >500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages > > Let me know what can I do to solve this. > ** Attachment added: "valgrind-pidgin.log.bz2" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24857860/valgrind-pidgin.log.bz2 -- Pidgin crashes multiple times a day https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354507 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 356566] [NEW] sadc: segfault
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sysstat Hi, just installed my brand new Jaunty Beta. Incredible work guys, never hoped to get such a fast startup! Being a performance fanatic, I installed the sysstat package to record some performance data. Taking a look at my dmesg output, I've noticed this: [ 3574.132570] sadc[7866]: segfault at c ip b7e02fc8 sp bff1f2f4 error 4 in libc-2.9.so[b7d92000+15c000] [ 4172.906709] sadc[8210]: segfault at c ip b7f05fc8 sp bf823854 error 4 in libc-2.9.so[b7e95000+15c000] [ 4773.368650] sadc[8600]: segfault at c ip b7f55fc8 sp bfe72bd4 error 4 in libc-2.9.so[b7ee5000+15c000] s...@ste-desktop:~$ lsb_release -rd apt-cache poDescription:Ubuntu jaunty (development branch) Release:9.04 s...@ste-desktop:~$ apt-cache policy sysstat sysstat: Installed: 8.1.7-1 Candidate: 8.1.7-1 Version table: *** 8.1.7-1 0 500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Let me know if you need any other information. Thanks a lot! ** Affects: sysstat (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- sadc: segfault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356566 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 229745] Re: after fix for #215728 - Committing to urlclassifier3.sqlite still causes excessive CPU usage and disk I/O (the 2nd)
Hi, I've just done that, reinstalled my machine by putting ext4 on / (and /home) and keeping my data on a separate ext3 partition. I can only say one word: WOW! Jaunty coupled with ext4 is super fast. Previoulsy my disk was pretty busy, especially during startup, with a lot of IO activity. I watch IO activity all the time, since it is actually my bottleneck. After the upgrade, I almost _NEVER_ see any IO activity!!! I suspect ext4 delayed allocation is the key here, along with the fact that I reinstalled, my previous filesystem had certainly some fragmentation (upgraded since Gutsy). So I would suggest anybody to deploy a similar approach: ext4 on / and data in a separate ext3 partition. Furthermore with Jaunty I noticed that preload is not necessary anymore, it seems that the filesystem cache is already primed. Many application start up much faster! I have a 8-years old PC with 512MB of RAM that now feels like a new machine. My best congratulations to all the devs :) 2009/4/11 Alexander Sack > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 02:15:00AM -, R (Chandra) Chandrasekhar wrote: > > Alexander Sack wrote: > > > in anycase, if you still have an issue in jaunty you could also > > > test ext4 filesystem which should help to make the filesystem access > > > done by firefox less IO hungry. > > > > Thanks for that hint. I need clarification on the ext4 filesystem: > > > > 1. Will it be an option in jaunty? > > Yes, from what i can recall its available as an option in the jaunty > installer. However, its still not 100% finished (which is reflected by > the fact that its still not the default for us). > > > > > > 2. Is it enough for the root partition / to be ext4 or should the /home > > partition also be ext4? > > The write operation happens on your /home partition, so migrating that > to ext4 should help. However, remember that with ext4 keeping regular > backups is even more important. > > - Alexander > > -- > after fix for #215728 - Committing to urlclassifier3.sqlite still causes > excessive CPU usage and disk I/O (the 2nd) > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229745 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in The Mozilla Firefox Browser: Invalid > Status in “firefox-3.0” source package in Ubuntu: Invalid > Status in “xulrunner-1.9” source package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix > Status in firefox-3.0 in Ubuntu Hardy: Invalid > Status in xulrunner-1.9 in Ubuntu Hardy: Won't Fix > Status in firefox-3.0 in Ubuntu Intrepid: Invalid > Status in xulrunner-1.9 in Ubuntu Intrepid: Won't Fix > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: firefox > > some follow up comments from bug #215728 > > [ https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/215728/comments/118 ]: > Yes, there is still some heavy disk I/O going on. It's no where near as > bad as it was before the update. This patch is a HUGE > improvement, but it still happens from time to time causing Firefox to > become unresponsive for a few seconds. > > > [ https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/215728/comments/120 ] > actually I've just measured some firefox heavy IO activity, but as Nick > reported, it is a matter of seconds and in my case it doesn't make the whole > system irresponsive as it was before the patch. > > Luckily I had disktop running, so here is the output. I can say that the > the slowdown that I felt was probably due to the large write of 5.5MB in 5 > seconds you can see at 18:28:31 - some random IO activity I guess. > -- after fix for #215728 - Committing to urlclassifier3.sqlite still causes excessive CPU usage and disk I/O (the 2nd) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229745 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 213086] Re: firefox 3.0b5 goes uninterruptible for a few seconds during normal browsing
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 215728 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215728 Hi, I've not noticed any more delay recently. You can check if IO is the problem by keeping open a terminal with the following command running: # pidstat -d 10 Every 10 seconds, prints a stat of the most IO intensive processes. Take a look at the output when FF hangs, and post the results. pidstat is part of sysstat package. Thanks! 2009/3/31 Fran : > *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 215728 *** > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215728 > > As I explain to GZ on a separate email, a workaround that worked for me was > disabling the phishing protection, > > edit>preference>security> then, turn off both "Tell me if the site" > options. At least until this get fixed. > > HTH, > > -Fran > > -- > firefox 3.0b5 goes uninterruptible for a few seconds during normal browsing > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213086 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug (via bug 215728). > > Status in “firefox” source package in Ubuntu: New > Status in “firefox-3.0” source package in Ubuntu: Confirmed > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: firefox > > I would have blamed it on flash and it's wrapper due to me being on a 64-bit > system, but I experience it during all use, even trying to enter this bug it > locked up at different points. I am running a fully updated Hardy Heron, > 64-bit, configuration. I will get any further information upon request. > -- firefox 3.0b5 goes uninterruptible for a few seconds during normal browsing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213086 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 285578] Re: Totally scrambled screen in Intrepid with mplayer and xserver-xorg-video-nv
Bryce, thanks for having confirmed this. Actually I'm experimenting this with Jaunty too. Too bad I have yet to find a way to reproduce it, I can tell you it typically happens when watching videos, going fullscreen and back. 2009/4/8 Bryce Harrington > ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-nv (Ubuntu) > Status: Incomplete => Confirmed > > -- > Totally scrambled screen in Intrepid with mplayer and xserver-xorg-video-nv > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285578 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in “xserver-xorg-video-nv” source package in Ubuntu: Confirmed > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-nv > > Hi, > in Intrepid I obtained a completely scrambled and messed up screen > after having viewed a video with mplayer! The only thing left to do was to > kill X with Ctrl-Alt-Backspace, since the computer becomes unusable. > > I've found a way to reproduce that error. > > 1) Download this HD movie (I don't know if this particular video is the > problem, but at least with that it occurs): > > > http://anon.nasa-global.edgesuite.net/qt.nasa-global/ksc/ksc_061108_glast_launch_720p.mov > > 2) Play it with mplayer. > > 3) Close the video window. > > Please let me know if you need more info to fix this! I've found that with > other players (VLC, totem) this do not occur. > > s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -rd > Description:Ubuntu intrepid (development branch) > Release:8.10 > > s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ apt-cache policy xserver-xorg-video-nv > xserver-xorg-video-nv: > Installed: 1:2.1.10-1ubuntu2 > Candidate: 1:2.1.10-1ubuntu2 > Version table: > *** 1:2.1.10-1ubuntu2 0 >500 http://sm.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages >100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > > s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ apt-cache policy mplayer > mplayer: > Installed: 2:1.0~rc2-0ubuntu17 > Candidate: 2:1.0~rc2-0ubuntu17 > Version table: > *** 2:1.0~rc2-0ubuntu17 0 >500 http://sm.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/multiverse Packages >100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV11 [GeForce2 MX/MX > 400] (rev b2) >Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device 4041 >Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- > Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- >Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- > SERR- Latency: 32 (1250ns min, 250ns max) >Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 12 >Region 0: Memory at ec00 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M] >Region 1: Memory at e000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M] >[virtual] Expansion ROM at ed00 [disabled] [size=64K] >Capabilities: >Kernel modules: rivafb, nvidiafb > -- Totally scrambled screen in Intrepid with mplayer and xserver-xorg-video-nv https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 394703] [NEW] iostat -xn crashes with stack smashing
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sysstat Hi, just tried iostat -xn command on Jaunty and got the following output: $ iostat -xn *** stack smashing detected ***: iostat terminated === Backtrace: = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x48)[0xb7f5fda8] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x0)[0xb7f5fd60] iostat[0x8050c80] iostat[0x804b845] iostat[0x804c46a] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe5)[0xb7e78775] iostat[0x8048fd1] === Memory map: 08048000-08054000 r-xp 08:01 277633 /usr/bin/iostat 08054000-08055000 r--p b000 08:01 277633 /usr/bin/iostat 08055000-08056000 rw-p c000 08:01 277633 /usr/bin/iostat 08bf7000-08c18000 rw-p 08bf7000 00:00 0 [heap] b7e06000-b7e13000 r-xp 08:01 57029 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 b7e13000-b7e14000 r--p c000 08:01 57029 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 b7e14000-b7e15000 rw-p d000 08:01 57029 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 b7e22000-b7e61000 r--p 08:01 301740 /usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_CTYPE b7e61000-b7e62000 rw-p b7e61000 00:00 0 b7e62000-b7fbe000 r-xp 08:01 74306 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.9.so b7fbe000-b7fbf000 ---p 0015c000 08:01 74306 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.9.so b7fbf000-b7fc1000 r--p 0015c000 08:01 74306 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.9.so b7fc1000-b7fc2000 rw-p 0015e000 08:01 74306 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.9.so b7fc2000-b7fc5000 rw-p b7fc2000 00:00 0 b7fc8000-b7fc9000 r--p 08:01 303382 /usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_NUMERIC b7fc9000-b7fca000 r--p 08:01 302210 /usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_TIME b7fca000-b7fd1000 r--s 08:01 294004 /usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules.cache b7fd1000-b7fd2000 r--p 08:01 303295 /usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_MESSAGES/SYS_LC_MESSAGES b7fd2000-b7fd4000 rw-p b7fd2000 00:00 0 b7fd4000-b7fd5000 r-xp b7fd4000 00:00 0 [vdso] b7fd5000-b7ff1000 r-xp 08:01 57540 /lib/ld-2.9.so b7ff1000-b7ff2000 r--p 0001b000 08:01 57540 /lib/ld-2.9.so b7ff2000-b7ff3000 rw-p 0001c000 08:01 57540 /lib/ld-2.9.so bfcde000-bfcf3000 rw-p bffeb000 00:00 0 [stack] Aborted The problem seems to be the -n option, since -x alone works correctly. Expected output would be of course the measurement of disk subsystem. What I got is the crash report above. # lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 # apt-cache policy sysstat sysstat: Installed: 8.1.7-1 Candidate: 8.1.7-1 Version table: *** 8.1.7-1 0 500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: sysstat (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- iostat -xn crashes with stack smashing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/394703 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 330824] Re: Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 partitions on 2.6.28
FWIW, on different PCs (desktop and laptop ) where I installed Jaunty + ext4 I'm having these hangs, I can trigger them reliably with the hang.py script... -- Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 partitions on 2.6.28 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 383295] Re: update-manager hangs on Jaunty
** Attachment added: ".xsession-errors" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27465198/.xsession-errors -- update-manager hangs on Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383295 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 383295] [NEW] update-manager hangs on Jaunty
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Hi, I'm experiencing some update-manager hangs on one of my laptops with Jaunty freshly installed. As you can see from the attached screenshot, the update-manager pops up, I choose to install the proposed packages, but it stays grey indefinitely - it doesn't even ask me the password for the authentication. This is problem doesn't always occur, in fact yesterday I updated the system with success. I've taken a look at my .xsession-errors and found something interesting, I'm attaching that too. Let me know if you need other info! Thanks p...@pier-desktop:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 p...@pier-desktop:~$ apt-cache policy update-manager update-manager: Installato: 1:0.111.9 Candidato: 1:0.111.9 Tabella versione: *** 1:0.111.9 0 500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:0.111.7 0 500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- update-manager hangs on Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383295 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 383295] Re: update-manager hangs on Jaunty
** Attachment added: "Schermata.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27465169/Schermata.png -- update-manager hangs on Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383295 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 385844] [NEW] Evince doesn't correctly display PDF document on Intrepid and Jaunty
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evince Hi, the attached PDF document is not displayed correctly in evince. Basically I get a blank screen, whereas on gmail I can view it correctly. To reproduce this is easy, just open the attached document. It happens on both Intrepid and Jaunty. ** Affects: evince (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Evince doesn't correctly display PDF document on Intrepid and Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385844 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 385844] Re: Evince doesn't correctly display PDF document on Intrepid and Jaunty
** Attachment added: "doc.pdf" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27771378/doc.pdf -- Evince doesn't correctly display PDF document on Intrepid and Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385844 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 385844] Re: Evince doesn't correctly display PDF document on Intrepid and Jaunty
Thanks, can you try with Intrepid? I've tried it just now, left rendering for minutes but all I get is a blank page - CPU completely idle. $ apt-cache policy evince evince: Installed: 2.24.1-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.24.1-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.24.1-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- Evince doesn't correctly display PDF document on Intrepid and Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385844 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 327735] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 131679 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131679 Sorry, can you explain how to unsubscribe? I've clicked on "Unsubscribe" icon but nothing happens. I'm still receiving this bug notifications. Thanks 2009/6/12 Charles Tryon > *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 131679 *** >https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131679 > > Maybe, but over 100 messages in the past three or four hours??? For one > bug??? > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Mathieu Marquer > wrote: > > > *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 131679 *** > >https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131679 > > > > Because you asked that for. If you don't want to receive updates about > the > > bug you reported, just go on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131679 et > > choose "unsubscribe me". > > > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:13, sasa wrote: > > > > > *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 131679 *** > > >https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131679 > > > > > > > > > Why you send me so many Emails more 100??? please don´t send me more!! > > > > > > > Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 03:24:54 + > > > > From: robert.anc...@canonical.com > > > > To: xsa...@hotmail.it > > > > Subject: [Bug 327735] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV > > > > > > > > *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 131679 *** > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131679 > > > > > > > > ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 277906 > > > > compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV (multiple causes and hardware) > > > > ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 131679 > > > > Crash inside doPoll() > > > > > > > > -- > > > > compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327735 > > > > You received this bug notification because you are a direct > subscriber > > > > of a duplicate bug (via bug 131679). > > > > > > > > Status in “compiz” source package in Ubuntu: New > > > > > > > > Bug description: > > > > Binary package hint: compiz > > > > > > > > compiz.real crash at the opening of the session > > > > > > > > ProblemType: Crash > > > > Architecture: i386 > > > > CrashCounter: 1 > > > > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 > > > > ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/compiz.real > > > > Package: compiz-core 1:0.7.8-0ubuntu9 > > > > ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/compiz.real --ignore-desktop-hints --replace > > > --indirect-rendering --sm-client-id > > > 105827732bedbc0b81234253455918530049280033 core ccp > > > > ProcEnviron: > > > > LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8 > > > > SHELL=/bin/bash > > > > Signal: 11 > > > > SourcePackage: compiz > > > > Stacktrace: #0 0x08055c8c in ?? () > > > > StacktraceTop: ?? () > > > > ThreadStacktrace: > > > > > > > > Title: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV > > > > Uname: Linux 2.6.28-7-generic i686 > > > > UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip fax floppy fuse lpadmin > > > netdev plugdev powerdev pulse-access pulse-rt sambashare scanner tape > > video > > > > > > _ > > > Quante ne sai? Gioca con Crosswire e mettiti alla prova! > > > http://livesearch.games.msn.com/crosswire/default_it/ > > > > > > -- > > > compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327735 > > > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > > > of a duplicate bug (via bug 131679). > > > > > > > -- > > compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327735 > > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > > of a duplicate bug (via bug 131679). > > > > Status in “compiz” source package in Ubuntu: New > > > > Bug description: > > Binary package hint: compiz > > > > compiz.real crash at the opening of the session > > > > ProblemType: Crash > > Architecture: i386 > > CrashCounter: 1 > > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 > > ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/compiz.real > > Package: compiz-core 1:0.7.8-0ubuntu9 > > ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/compiz.real --ignore-desktop-hints --replace > > --indirect-rendering --sm-client-id > > 105827732bedbc0b81234253455918530049280033 core ccp > > ProcEnviron: > > LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8 > > SHELL=/bin/bash > > Signal: 11 > > SourcePackage: compiz > > Stacktrace: #0 0x08055c8c in ?? () > > StacktraceTop: ?? () > > ThreadStacktrace: > > > > Title: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV > > Uname: Linux 2.6.28-7-generic i686 > > UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip fax floppy fuse lpadmin > > netdev plugdev powerdev pulse-access pulse-rt sambashare scanner tape > video > > > > > -- >Charles Tryon > Tryon Software Associates > http://www.tryonsoftware.com/ > _ > "It's the job that's never started that takes longest to finish." >-- Samwise Gamgee > > -- > compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327735 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of a duplicate bug (via bug 131679). > > Status in “compiz” source package in U
Re: [Bug 246099] Re: Screen corruption while scrolling gnome-system-monitor process list
Hi Teej, sorry for not giving info anymore, I forgot about that. The problem is definitely fixed, no more issues now! I can say that up to me, this is solved both in Hardy and Intrepid. Thanks again and keep up with the great work! 2008/12/5 Teej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make > Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been > any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue > for you? Can you try with latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance. > > ** Changed in: ubuntu > Status: New => Incomplete > > -- > Screen corruption while scrolling gnome-system-monitor process list > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246099 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in Ubuntu: Incomplete > > Bug description: > Hi, > after some scrolling in the gnome-system-monitor process list, the list > itself gets corrupted. > > I don't know which package should be blamed, but the problem don't seem to > be present in all gtk lists - for example, scrolling in the rythmbox song > list works correctly. > > I attach a screenshot which clarifies this issue. > > I'm using Hardy up to date, NVIDIA drivers, metacity. > > Let me know if you need any other info. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsb_release -rd > Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1 > Release:8.04 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy gnome-system-monitor > gnome-system-monitor: > Installed: 2.22.1-0ubuntu2 > Candidate: 2.22.1-0ubuntu2 > Version table: > *** 2.22.1-0ubuntu2 0 >500 http://sm.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-updates/main Packages >100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 2.22.0-1ubuntu3 0 >500 http://sm.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy nvidia-glx > nvidia-glx: > Installed: 1:96.43.05+2.6.24.13-19.44 > Candidate: 1:96.43.05+2.6.24.13-19.44 > Version table: > *** 1:96.43.05+2.6.24.13-19.44 0 >500 http://sm.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-updates/restricted Packages >100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 1:96.43.05+2.6.24.13-18.41 0 >500 http://security.ubuntu.com hardy-security/restricted Packages > 1:96.43.05+2.6.24.12-16.34 0 >500 http://sm.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/restricted Packages > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy nvidia-kernel-common > nvidia-kernel-common: > Installed: 20051028+1ubuntu8 > Candidate: 20051028+1ubuntu8 > Version table: > *** 20051028+1ubuntu8 0 >500 http://sm.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/restricted Packages >100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > -- Screen corruption while scrolling gnome-system-monitor process list https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246099 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303691] [NEW] Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: foomatic-db Hi, with Intrepid I can no longer print correctly with the said printer. In particular, what happens is that the page is printed, but the margins are wrong. It seems that the page is printed with zoom, the fonts are huge and the page does not fit the paper. Printing for example the ubuntu test page, I see the top left corner aligned correctly, but I cannot see the other three corners since the page is like zoomed. On the top right corner, I see the ubuntu logo, and on the right paper edge I see the 50% label of the various colors. One important fact I discovered is that this happens with the recommented driver, which is Foomatic/ljet2p. If I choose the other avalable driver, which is CUPS+Gutenprint v5.2.0-rc1, the printing is correct! Let me know if you need other info to track this down. Basically a single test page print should be enough to determine if the bug is solved, since currently the printed page doesn't fit the corners at all. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 8.10 Release:8.10 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy foomatic-db foomatic-db: Installato: 20080918-0ubuntu4 Candidato: 20080918-0ubuntu4 Tabella versione: *** 20080918-0ubuntu4 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Thanks, and congrats on the great work! Go ubuntu! ** Affects: foomatic-db (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303691] Re: Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer
Guys, first of all many thanks for the prompt reply, you are GREAT! Yes, I'll stay with Gutenprint driver. I was wondering myself too which one is best, if there are differences at all. Up to now I've printed only some openoffice letters and test pages, it seems they are equivalent - with Hardy I've always used foomatic. I'll try your suggestion in a moment, let me try and I'll back with the result. Thanks again! -- Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303691] Re: Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer
Ok guys, the resolution seems to be the culprit. Gutenprint driver can't do 600DPI, max is 300. I've tried to print with foomatic @ 300DPI, and guess what? It prints ok. Going back to 600DPI, the problem comes back. So this is the problem, you were right! BTW guys, with Intrepid I no longer see the print icon into the tray bar during printing, is this a known issue or I have to open a separate bug? Thanks, you're GREAT! -- Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303691] Re: Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer
Regarding which is better, I can now say that the default recommendation is right, since foomatic can actually do 600DPI, whereas Gutenprint doesn't go beyond 300. -- Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285578] Re: Totally scrambled screen in Intrepid with mplayer and xserver-xorg-video-nv
Hello Bryce, unfortunately, from time to time this bug reappears. It is quite hard to debug it though. When it happens (i.e. screen totally scrambled) It is enough to press an Alt+Ctrl+F1 to bring the correct screen back. Notice that this is a weird behaviour too, since with this combination normally I get console number one. Instead, when the bug occurs, I get the X screen again and it is correctly displayed. At this point I recognize that this is quite difficult to track down. Still, since it occurred to me some days ago, I attach to this bug the whole set of Xorg logs I have in my /var/log, I hope that you can find this useful. If you have any other suggestion that can help to track this down, please just let me know. Thanks again and keep up with the great work! -- Totally scrambled screen in Intrepid with mplayer and xserver-xorg-video-nv https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285578] Re: Totally scrambled screen in Intrepid with mplayer and xserver-xorg-video-nv
** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20146245/lspci-vvnn.log -- Totally scrambled screen in Intrepid with mplayer and xserver-xorg-video-nv https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285578] Re: Totally scrambled screen in Intrepid with mplayer and xserver-xorg-video-nv
** Attachment added: "Xorg.logs.tgz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20146255/Xorg.logs.tgz -- Totally scrambled screen in Intrepid with mplayer and xserver-xorg-video-nv https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 303691] Re: Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer
Great work Tim! I'm looking forward to try it in Intrepid. Thanks guys! 2009/1/15 Launchpad Bug Tracker <303...@bugs.launchpad.net> > This bug was fixed in the package foomatic-filters - 4.0.0-0ubuntu1 > > --- > foomatic-filters (4.0.0-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low > > * New upstream release (4.0.0 final release, BZR rev 195) > - Let custom JCL options get correctly inserted. > - Treat "None" as empty string in string and password options. > - String and password option settings got inserted with the > "Custom." prefix. > - Fixed seghfault which occured when using string options. > - Make foomatic-rip working correctly with PostScript of StarOffice 8 > - The PostScript code of PostScript options did not get inserted when > the spooler is CUPS and foomatic-rip had to convert incoming PDF to > PostScript (LP: #299918) > - Made merging of PJL options of the PPD and of the driver correctly > working. > - Corrected the insertion of the "%%PageSetup" sections. > - Inserted PostScript option settings from pstops were not corrected > with custom option settings done on the command line (numerical, > string, password). > - If there was only one PJL option in the PPD no PJL got added at all > (LP: #303691). > - Made foomatic-rip conforming with the LSB compliance tests (LSB bug > #2423). > - Fixed infinite loop when page-specific option settings are used. > - Made foomatic-rip correctly working with custom JCL options. > - Option setting insertions got corrupted when there is a composite > option in the PPD file (Upstream bug #173, comment #23). > > -- Till KamppeterThu, 15 Jan 2009 > 10:39:49 +0100 > > ** Changed in: foomatic-filters (Ubuntu) >Status: In Progress => Fix Released > > -- > Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in "foomatic-filters" source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: foomatic-db > > Hi, >with Intrepid I can no longer print correctly with the said printer. > > In particular, what happens is that the page is printed, but the margins > are wrong. It seems that the page is printed with zoom, the fonts are huge > and the page does not fit the paper. Printing for example the ubuntu test > page, I see the top left corner aligned correctly, but I cannot see the > other three corners since the page is like zoomed. On the top right corner, > I see the ubuntu logo, and on the right paper edge I see the 50% label of > the various colors. > > One important fact I discovered is that this happens with the recommented > driver, which is Foomatic/ljet2p. If I choose the other avalable driver, > which is CUPS+Gutenprint v5.2.0-rc1, the printing is correct! > > Let me know if you need other info to track this down. Basically a single > test page print should be enough to determine if the bug is solved, since > currently the printed page doesn't fit the corners at all. > > p...@pier-laptop:~$ lsb_release -rd > Description:Ubuntu 8.10 > Release:8.10 > > p...@pier-laptop:~$ apt-cache policy foomatic-db > foomatic-db: > Installato: 20080918-0ubuntu4 > Candidato: 20080918-0ubuntu4 > Tabella versione: > *** 20080918-0ubuntu4 0 >500 http://archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages >100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > p...@pier-laptop:~$ > > > Thanks, and congrats on the great work! > Go ubuntu! > -- Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317490] [NEW] gnome-power-statistics seems to stop data graph
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager Hi, I've just installed a fresh ubuntu Intrepid into my laptop at work. I've keep open gnome-power-statistics in a separate workspace, just to look at power consumption. I've noticed that it seems to stop the data graph at some time. For example, today I powered on my laptop at 9 AM and opened up g-p-s. Now, at 3 PM, g-p-s shows last data point at 3h30, as you can see in the attached screenshot. No more data is plotted since some hours, actually. If I generate an event, for example unplug the AC, then the graphs suddenly animate again and it show power consumption again. Furthermore, also see that in the bottom right of the screen saver you can see a white square (which is a data point I guess) outside of the drawing area. Let me know if any other info is needed. d...@sdoni-laptop-dev53:~/SCRIPT$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 8.10 Release:8.10 d...@sdoni-laptop-dev53:~/SCRIPT$ apt-cache policy gnome-power-manager gnome-power-manager: Installed: 2.24.0-0ubuntu8.1 Candidate: 2.24.0-0ubuntu8.1 Version table: *** 2.24.0-0ubuntu8.1 0 500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.24.0-0ubuntu8 0 500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages ** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gnome-power-statistics seems to stop data graph https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317490 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317490] Re: gnome-power-statistics seems to stop data graph
** Attachment added: "Screenshot.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21239254/Screenshot.png -- gnome-power-statistics seems to stop data graph https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317490 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 314358] [NEW] 'ubuntu-bug -p linux' redirects me to a non existent launchpad page
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apport Hi, I've just had a kernel lockup on my Intrepid Ubuntu. Searching for the correct way to report this, I've seen that the wiki suggests using: $ ubuntu-bug -p linux So I did, but after the data collection, firefox is redirected to a wrong launchpad page, so the result is that this is actually useless. The URL on which ubuntu-bug redirects me is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+filebug/9pYf8pj539SpOCGCOoAucMXsZKj? and the error that LP gives is a Page Not Found: "Lost something? There’s no page with this address in Launchpad. Check that you entered the address correctly. " s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 8.10 Release:8.10 s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ apt-cache policy apport apport: Installed: 0.119 Candidate: 0.119 Version table: *** 0.119 0 500 http://sm.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Bye! ** Affects: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- 'ubuntu-bug -p linux' redirects me to a non existent launchpad page https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314358 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 314362] [NEW] Intrepid kernel lockup
Public bug reported: Hi, I've just experimented a kernel lockup. Here is what I did. I was surfing the net as usual, as a NIC I have a USB wireless card (see lspci attached). I had the need to upload some pictures taken with my camera. So: 1) I unplugged my USB wireless card 2) I plugged my USB cable connected to the camera 3) Downloaded the pics 4) Unmounted the camera 5) Unplugged the camera 6) Plugged the USB wireless card again After the 6th step, the system was freezed. No more input to any key. I've not tried Sysrq though, I read about it after the reboot :) However, I can tell you that two of my keyboard leds were blinking. What does that mean? I attach the relevant data, albeit into kernel.log. I've not used ubuntu-bug -p linux since that didn't work (I just opened a new bug for this). Any other info, just ask, I'm willing to help! Bye! ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Intrepid kernel lockup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 314362] Re: Intrepid kernel lockup
** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20946529/lspci-vvnn.log -- Intrepid kernel lockup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 314362] Re: Intrepid kernel lockup
** Attachment added: "version.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20946543/version.log -- Intrepid kernel lockup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 314362] Re: Intrepid kernel lockup
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20946531/dmesg.log -- Intrepid kernel lockup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 314362] Re: Intrepid kernel lockup
** Attachment added: "uname-a.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20946546/uname-a.log -- Intrepid kernel lockup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 314362] Re: Intrepid kernel lockup
** Attachment added: "kern.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20946548/kern.log -- Intrepid kernel lockup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 314362] Re: Intrepid kernel lockup
One note. The lockup happened at 'Jan 6 13:01:09', you can search that string into the kern.log to see the last records before I pressed the reset button. -- Intrepid kernel lockup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 216878] Re: [regression]Slow disk transfer rate on Hardy
Hal,
it is just the opposite.
This bug is not present in Hardy, but it is there in Intrepid.
The fact that you notice an improvement, IMHO means that you are not hitting
this bug actually.
2009/1/7 Hal
> This bug seems to be fixed in 8.10 (Intrepid Ibex). All systems I
> reported above exhibit improved performance in 8.10 as well as several
> more with Compact Flash adapters. A Fix for this in Hardy would be good
> to allow continued use of an LTS system.
>
> --
> [regression]Slow disk transfer rate on Hardy
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216878
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in "linux" source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
>
> Bug description:
> Hi,
> upgrading from Gutsy to Hardy I've seen a considerable HD transfer rate
> slowdown.
>
> I have a machine with two IDE disks, both are udma5 capable. In Gutsy, they
> were recognised as 'hd[ab]' and I with hdparm sequential thoughput was:
>
> /dev/hdb:
> Timing buffered disk reads: 172 MB in 3.01 seconds = 57.19 MB/sec
>
> which is quite correct for that kind of drive.
>
> In Hardy, they are recognized as 'sd[ab]', and the performance regarding
> transfer rate is LESS THAN HALF:
>
> /dev/sdb:
> Timing buffered disk reads: 78 MB in 3.01 seconds = 25.92 MB/sec
>
> That slowdown is visible also during file transfer operations, obviously.
> One thing I've noticed is that in the dmesg, my drive is set at UDMA/33, and
> also hdparm reports that udma2 is currently configured:
>
> sudo hdparm -i /dev/sdb
>
> /dev/sdb:
>
> Model=WDC WD2500JB-00GVC0 , FwRev=08.02D08, SerialNo=
> WD-WCAL78023606
> Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec SpinMotCtl Fixed DTR>5Mbs FmtGapReq }
> RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=57600, SectSize=600, ECCbytes=74
> BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=8192kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=?16?
> CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=488397168
> IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:120,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
> PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
> DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
> UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 *udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5
> AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled
> Drive conforms to: Unspecified: ATA/ATAPI-1,2,3,4,5,6
>
> * signifies the current active mode
>
> I've seen a number of users complaining about that, a number of bugs with
> status Incomplete or Release Fixed. I can say that with the latest Hardy
> patches (as of now), the problem is still there. Will that be fixed before
> the final release? If not, that can be a huge performance penalty!
>
> Here are some infos. I'm willing to help to solve the problem, just ask if
> you need any info.
> s...@ste-ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -rd
> Description:Ubuntu hardy (development branch)
> Release:8.04
>
> Pertinent dmesg output:
>
> [ 35.085132] libata version 3.00 loaded.
> [ 35.460830] pata_via :00:11.1: version 0.3.3
> [ 35.463781] scsi0 : pata_via
> [ 35.465345] scsi1 : pata_via
> [ 35.465441] ata1: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x1f0 ctl 0x3f6 bmdma 0xcc00 irq
> 14
> [ 35.465446] ata2: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xcc08 irq
> 15
> [ 35.637026] ata1.00: ATA-6: Maxtor 5T030H3, TAH71DP0, max UDMA/100
> [ 35.637034] ata1.00: 60030432 sectors, multi 16: LBA
> [ 35.638417] ata1.01: ATA-6: WDC WD2500JB-00GVC0, 08.02D08, max UDMA/100
> [ 35.638424] ata1.01: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48
> [ 35.638446] ata1.00: limited to UDMA/33 due to 40-wire cable
> [ 35.638450] ata1.01: limited to UDMA/33 due to 40-wire cable
> [ 35.652916] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/33
> [ 35.669962] ata1.01: configured for UDMA/33
> [ 36.136471] ata2.00: ATAPI: LG DVD-ROM DRD-8160B, 1.01, max
> UDMA/33
> [ 36.136502] ata2.01: ATAPI: HL-DT-ST GCE-8160B, 1.02, max MWDMA2
> [ 36.300210] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/33
> [ 36.464034] ata2.01: configured for MWDMA2
> [ 36.464239] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA Maxtor 5T030H3
> TAH7 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
> [ 36.464959] scsi 0:0:1:0: Direct-Access ATA WDC WD2500JB-00G
> 08.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
>
> Kernel:
>
> Linux ste-ubuntu 2.6.24-16-generic #1 SMP Thu Apr 10 13:23:42 UTC 2008 i686
> GNU/Linux
>
> For other info, just let me know! BTW, congrats for the GREAT WORK!!!
>
--
[regression]Slow disk transfer rate on Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216878
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 284279] Re: Intrepid: Since update, Evolution has a problem with mail distribution lists
I've just opened the new bug into gnome tracking system: Bug 566649 – Evolution handles incorrectly distribution lists -- Intrepid: Since update, Evolution has a problem with mail distribution lists https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284279 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 284279] Re: Intrepid: Since update, Evolution has a problem with mail distribution lists
Hi, we have the same problem in our organization! Pedro, so this package not supported by Ubuntu? -- Intrepid: Since update, Evolution has a problem with mail distribution lists https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284279 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278147] Re: [Intrepid] nm-applet fails to start after upgrade to intrepid
Hi, I have solved my issue. In fact it was not a NM problem at all. NM applet did not appear since my wireless connection was statically configured into /etc/network/interfaces. This was due to the fact that I disabled DHCP of my router some years ago. Now I've a more straightforward setup, with no more entries into interfaces file and all is configured through NM and working PERFECTLY. All I have to say is thanks to Alex and GNOME devs for his great work on that component of Ubuntu, which is actually a BIG step forward for the general user experience. Now I really feel that 'it just works', no more tweaking to get wireless working! -- [Intrepid] nm-applet fails to start after upgrade to intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278147 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303691] Re: Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer
Thans Tim, when we will be able to have this change applied to ubuntu? If you need any testing, just le me know! Thanks again. -- Intrepid, print broken with Minolta PagePro 8L printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303691 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 311734] [NEW] Intrepid, missing printer icon during printing
Public bug reported: Hi, since my hardy to intrepid upgrade, I've noticed that during printing the printer icon on the top panel is no more present. The effect is that, after the "Print" click, you have to wait some time (especially on a old PC, for PDF docs) during which the system doesn't show you any information. It seems like the print command has not been received, actually. Eventually, the printer starts to print correctly. p...@pier-laptop:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 8.10 Release:8.10 If you need any more info to track this down, just le me know, I'm willing to help! Thanks for the great work! ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Intrepid, missing printer icon during printing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311734 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 293235] Re: Systemtap broken on Intrepid
Hello Giannis, it is very easy to fix the problem. As it is shown here: http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/823e9c47714d5835?pli=1 It is enough to edit the file: /usr/share/systemtap/runtime/time.c locate the following line: ret = on_each_cpu(__stp_init_time, NULL, 0, 1); and substitute it with this line: ret = on_each_cpu(__stp_init_time, NULL, 1); Then you'll be able to use systemtap on Intrepid! Let's wait for the official fix now :) BTW great work guys, as usual! 2008/11/17 Giannis Kozyrakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I can confirm this behaviour. Systemtap is completely unusable right now > on Intrepid. > > -- > Systemtap broken on Intrepid > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293235 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in "systemtap" source package in Ubuntu: New > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: systemtap > > Hi, > in Intrepid I cannot run any systemtap script, since each one fails > with this error: > > Running make -C "/lib/modules/2.6.27-7-generic/build" M="/tmp/stapy5xLfx" > modules >/dev/null > In file included from > /usr/share/systemtap/runtime/transport/transport.c:20, > from /usr/share/systemtap/runtime/print.c:17, > from /usr/share/systemtap/runtime/runtime.h:82, > from > /tmp/stapy5xLfx/stap_924da4375b80b1c6e0f56a8c9ede2ed3_53982.c:41: > /usr/share/systemtap/runtime/time.c: In function '_stp_init_time': > /usr/share/systemtap/runtime/time.c:240: error: too many arguments to > function 'on_each_cpu' > make[1]: *** > [/tmp/stapy5xLfx/stap_924da4375b80b1c6e0f56a8c9ede2ed3_53982.o] Error 1 > make: *** [_module_/tmp/stapy5xLfx] Error 2 > Pass 4: compiled C into "stap_924da4375b80b1c6e0f56a8c9ede2ed3_53982.ko" in > 3430usr/730sys/5398real ms. > Pass 4: compilation failed. Try again with more '-v' (verbose) options. > > It seems to be a known problem, which has been patched this summer: > > > http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/823e9c47714d5835 > > Can you please update systemtap package to reflect this API change? > > Thanks! > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy systemtap > systemtap: > Installed: 0.0.20080705-2ubuntu1 > Candidate: 0.0.20080705-2ubuntu1 > Version table: > *** 0.0.20080705-2ubuntu1 0 >500 http://sm.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/universe Packages >100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsb_release -rd > Description:Ubuntu 8.10 > Release:8.10 > -- Systemtap broken on Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293235 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301040] [NEW] Preferred applications doesn't work
Public bug reported: Hi, I've found that System->Preferences->Preferred applications does not work. I wanted to make my preferred multimedia player to be vlc. I've choosed Custom and put vlc path. It looks correct, but when I click on a mp3 file, Totem is what the system opens. I've also tried to choose Rythmbox, which is an available option - so no Custom path - with the same results. I think this is not what this application should do, isn't it? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 8.10 Release:8.10 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Preferred applications doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301040 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
