[Bug 554064] Re: Graphic file missing in Gcompris circuit simulation
Using GCompris v9.0 I cannot reproduce this issue. Can you provide more information on the version you were using? ** Changed in: gcompris (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- Graphic file missing in Gcompris circuit simulation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 228415] Re: Update download speed is incredibly slow for connection
Me too. I am using Intrepid and update-manager is so slow that I've completely given up on it. Compared to apt-get from the command-line, I'd have to say that update-manager is 10x slower if not more. It took over an hour to download 14 normal sized packages. Although I can't get you exact details on what I was downloading and the speeds (right now), I can guarantee that it's awfully slow. This is also seen by my co-workers, and I should note that we are all behind an http proxy server (again, though, apt-get is fast). If there are any tests I can run to compare the speeds, like downloading dummy packages, I'd be happy to oblige. -- Update download speed is incredibly slow for connection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228415 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 238237] Re: kio-umountwrapper won't uninstall
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 186729 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186729 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 186729 Cannot uninstall kio-umountwrapper -- kio-umountwrapper won't uninstall https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238237 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 236429] Re: uninstalling kio-umountwrapper fails
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 186729 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186729 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 186729 Cannot uninstall kio-umountwrapper -- uninstalling kio-umountwrapper fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234064] Re: can't remove kio-unmountwrapper package
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 186729 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186729 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 186729 Cannot uninstall kio-umountwrapper -- can't remove kio-unmountwrapper package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 210415] Re: tight vnc server crashes frequently
Me too, and also while doing Eclipse work. However, I've been doing this for a few weeks without issues and now the crashes are pretty repeatable. I'm attaching my stack in case it has any additional useful info. Note: My stack trace cut-off for some reason. ** Attachment added: Stack trace http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15026781/stack.txt -- tight vnc server crashes frequently https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210415 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227946] [NEW] cd //; pwd -- shows // when in root directory (/)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bash Today I accidentally typed this: cd // I was amazed to see that my prompt showed me as being in the // directory, which was functionally equivalent to /. The pwd command also shows //. Bash is correctly handling the case of /// and which is as far as I tried. This is not really harmful, but strange. zsh for one handles this properly. I did not try tcsh. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd / [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$ ls bindebian finnix-test initrd.img media proc srv tmp vmlinuz boot dev home lib mntroot storage usr cdrom etc initrd lost+found optsbin sys var [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$ cd ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd // [EMAIL PROTECTED]://$ ls bindebian finnix-test initrd.img media proc srv tmp vmlinuz boot dev home lib mntroot storage usr cdrom etc initrd lost+found optsbin sys var [EMAIL PROTECTED]://$ cd ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd / [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$ pwd / [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$ cd ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd // [EMAIL PROTECTED]://$ pwd // [EMAIL PROTECTED]://$ cd ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd /// [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$ cd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$ cd / [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$ cd Package info: bash 3.2-0ubuntu16 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu intrepid (development branch) Release:8.10 ** Affects: bash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- cd //; pwd -- shows // when in root directory (/) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227946 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227946] Re: cd //; pwd -- shows // when in root directory (/)
Since I can't change the priority yet (status=New), I would like to state that this is obviously just an annoyance or a curiosity. I had no functionality issues. -- cd //; pwd -- shows // when in root directory (/) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227946 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219289] [NEW] upgrading sun-java packages breaks alternatives
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sun-java6-bin This morning I upgraded to all the sun java packages to 6-06-0ubuntu1. After the upgrade, all my java-related alternatives (java, javac, etc) had reverted back to gjc. This is annoying and I think that the alternatives should either stay where they are set to or it should ask before it resets them all. Description:Ubuntu 8.04 Release:8.04 ** Affects: sun-java6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- upgrading sun-java packages breaks alternatives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219289 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219294] [NEW] xterm segfaults if more than 9999 scroll lines
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xterm xterm is segfaulting whenever I use more than scroll lines. I was previously using 5 lines of scrollback and it worked fine, but now it's broken. I would have to guess that it broke with the latest version (229-1ubuntu1) because it has previously worked for me. I am running 229-1ubuntu1, I will try to run an older version and see what happens. Here is the command line I've used for testing, although the colors don't seem to matter: xterm +vb -sb -sl 5000 -bg black -fg red -fn 7x13bold -- Works xterm +vb -sb -sl -bg black -fg red -fn 7x13bold -- Works xterm +vb -sb -sl 1 -bg black -fg red -fn 7x13bold -- segfault xterm +vb -sb -sl 10001 -bg black -fg red -fn 7x13bold -- segfault I will also try to get a core dump and update the bug. ** Affects: xterm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- xterm segfaults if more than scroll lines https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219294] Re: xterm segfaults if more than 9999 scroll lines
Two notes: 1) I cannot seem to get a core file. The program is crashing as follows: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ xterm +vb -sb -sl 5 -bg black -fg red -fn 7x13bold Segmentation fault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo $? 139 I have looked all over for the core file and I have apport installed as I found mentioned in the Wiki. It's not in /var/crash either. 2) The bug title is now inaccurate. xterm seems to like some values and not like others. For example: 1 - works 10001 - segfault 10002 - segfault 9993 - segfault 9992 - segfault - segfault (sometimes) I will run this under gdb since this is getting more and more odd. -- xterm segfaults if more than scroll lines https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219294] Re: xterm segfaults if more than 9999 scroll lines
More notes. 1) I ran run this under the same args and sometimes it will fail and sometimes succeed. I am killing the window after each run, so I am not showing hundreds of windows (and so I'm not out of memory). In this example, you see the same ags and they fail, then work, then fail! [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ xterm +vb -sb -sl 10001 -bg black -fg red -fn 7x13bold Segmentation fault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ xterm +vb -sb -sl 10001 -bg black -fg red -fn 7x13bold [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ xterm +vb -sb -sl 10001 -bg black -fg red -fn 7x13bold Segmentation fault 2) I noticed that this keeps showing up in .xsession-errors when there is an error. Unfortunately, I'm more of a systems programmer (think commandline), so I'm out of my element on what this means: X Error: BadWindow (invalid Window parameter) 3 Major opcode: 19 Minor opcode: 0 Resource id: 0x3800010 ** Summary changed: - xterm segfaults if more than scroll lines + xterm segfaults randomly ** Description changed: + UPDATE: The fault seems to be totally random since the same args can + succeed sometimes and will segfault on others. See the 2nd comment + below. + Binary package hint: xterm xterm is segfaulting whenever I use more than scroll lines. I was previously using 5 lines of scrollback and it worked fine, but now it's broken. I would have to guess that it broke with the latest version (229-1ubuntu1) because it has previously worked for me. I am running 229-1ubuntu1, I will try to run an older version and see what happens. Here is the command line I've used for testing, although the colors don't seem to matter: xterm +vb -sb -sl 5000 -bg black -fg red -fn 7x13bold -- Works xterm +vb -sb -sl -bg black -fg red -fn 7x13bold -- Works xterm +vb -sb -sl 1 -bg black -fg red -fn 7x13bold -- segfault xterm +vb -sb -sl 10001 -bg black -fg red -fn 7x13bold -- segfault I will also try to get a core dump and update the bug. -- xterm segfaults randomly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208397] [NEW] some package names break --include or --exclude regexp
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: debmirror I was trying to include the package called bonnie++ and the ++ portion of the name is breaking in the regexp handler code. The --include argument is specifically for regexp and not specifically for direct package names, but in my case, I keep a file with a list of packages I need and now I will have to scrub the package list. Another solution might be to accept a new argument called --include_package_name which did not use regexp. (I was building a debian mirror here, but my system is ubuntu). dpkg output: ii debmirror 20070123ubuntu1 Full details below: debmirror --ignore-release-gpg --nosource --progress -a i386 -s main -h debian-mirror.fc.hp.com -d etch,unstable -r /debian --exclude=. --include=bonnie++ -e http ./debian Mirroring to ./debian from http://debian-mirror.fc.hp.com//debian/ Arches: i386 Dists: etch,unstable Sections: main Will clean up AFTER mirroring. Pdiff mode: use. Attempting to get lock, this might take 2 minutes before it fails. Get Release files. [0%] Getting: dists/etch/Release... ok [0%] Getting: dists/etch/Release.gpg... ok [0%] Getting: dists/unstable/Release... ok [0%] Getting: dists/unstable/Release.gpg... ok Get Packages and Sources files and other miscellany. Parse Packages and Sources files and add to the file list everything therein. Nested quantifiers in regex; marked by -- HERE in m/(bonnie++ -- HERE )/ at /usr/bin/debmirror line 829, INDEX line 18. WARNING: releasing 1 pending lock... ** Affects: debmirror (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- some package names break --include or --exclude regexp https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208397] Re: some package names break --include or --exclude regexp
Note, I have a simple work-around for now, but I'm concerned that this will come up again with perhaps new weird package names causing issues. My work-around is to run my package list through: sed 's/\+\+/./' -- some package names break --include or --exclude regexp https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208397] Re: some package names break --include or --exclude regexp
After more testing and research I realize that this is more of a wishlist item than a defect. This tool is not designed to take specific package names. ** Changed in: debmirror (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- some package names break --include or --exclude regexp https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 204612] Re: nut 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu1 fails to install on Hardy Heron
I cleared my apt cache purged out the old install of nut and reinstalled. I cannot reproduce this either. If this happens to you, a reboot and/or running apt-get clean seems to fix it. -- nut 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu1 fails to install on Hardy Heron https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204612 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 204612] Re: nut 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu1 fails to install on Hardy Heron
Mine is on x86 or i386, whatever it's called. If you plan on helping to diagnose this, don't reboot, it seems to clear up the issue. -- nut 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu1 fails to install on Hardy Heron https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204612 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 204612] Re: nut 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu1 fails to install on Hardy Heron
This is still occurring in 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu3: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mfisch# apt-get install nut Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Suggested packages: nut-cgi nut-dev nut-snmp The following NEW packages will be installed: nut 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/1203kB of archives. After this operation, 2925kB of additional disk space will be used. Preconfiguring packages ... Selecting previously deselected package nut. (Reading database ... 107695 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking nut (from .../nut_2.2.1-2.1ubuntu3_i386.deb) ... Setting up nut (2.2.1-2.1ubuntu3) ... cp: cannot create special file `/dev/kmem': File exists cp: cannot create special file `/dev/loop0': File exists cp: cannot create special file `/dev/net/tun': File exists cp: cannot create special file `/dev/null': File exists cp: cannot create special file `/dev/ppp': File exists invoke-rc.d: initscript udev, action restart failed. dpkg: error processing nut (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: nut E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- nut 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu1 fails to install on Hardy Heron https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204612 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 204612] Re: nut 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu1 fails to install on Hardy Heron
This is still occurring in 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu3: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mfisch# apt-get install nut Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Suggested packages: nut-cgi nut-dev nut-snmp The following NEW packages will be installed: nut 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/1203kB of archives. After this operation, 2925kB of additional disk space will be used. Preconfiguring packages ... Selecting previously deselected package nut. (Reading database ... 107695 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking nut (from .../nut_2.2.1-2.1ubuntu3_i386.deb) ... Setting up nut (2.2.1-2.1ubuntu3) ... cp: cannot create special file `/dev/kmem': File exists cp: cannot create special file `/dev/loop0': File exists cp: cannot create special file `/dev/net/tun': File exists cp: cannot create special file `/dev/null': File exists cp: cannot create special file `/dev/ppp': File exists invoke-rc.d: initscript udev, action restart failed. dpkg: error processing nut (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: nut E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- nut 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu1 fails to install on Hardy Heron https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204612 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 204612] Re: nut 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu1 fails to install on Hardy Heron
This is still occurring in 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu3 or it broke again since the fix. ** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = New -- nut 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu1 fails to install on Hardy Heron https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204612 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 204612] Re: nut 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu1 fails to install on Hardy Heron
Another note, rebooting still resolves the issue, as long as you perform an apt-get purge before trying to install again (apt-get remove might work too, I didn't try it). When I rebooted and tried to install again BEFORE I did the purge, I got this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get install nut Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done nut is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up nut (2.2.1-2.1ubuntu3) ... chown: cannot access `/var/run/nut': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing nut (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: nut E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- nut 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu1 fails to install on Hardy Heron https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204612 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
