[Bug 884210] Re: PCI/internal sound not working randomly, random hangs: cannot set freq 16000 to ep 0x86 shown in syslog
Thanks for the blunt but effective script. Hope this spanner in the works is fixed soon. Glad to see the importance is high. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884210 Title: PCI/internal sound not working randomly, random hangs: cannot set freq 16000 to ep 0x86 shown in syslog To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/884210/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884210] Re: PCI/internal sound not working randomly, random hangs: cannot set freq 16000 to ep 0x86 shown in syslog
Except that...my Logitech webcam no longer appears as an audio input option in sound settings after a reboot. It does appear if I unplug and replug the webcam. So it boots but to use Skype still requires manual intervention. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884210 Title: PCI/internal sound not working randomly, random hangs: cannot set freq 16000 to ep 0x86 shown in syslog To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/884210/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1005138] [NEW] Disk Utility starts partitions at sector 63
Public bug reported: This is my second attempt to log a bug report. Grr. And why doesn't this form accept Disk Utilty or palimsest as the package name? Disk Utility starts the first partition on an MBR formatted disk at sector 63. This is a problem because: 1) There is not enough room for Grub if the OS is installed on RAID and LVM 2) Causes partition misalignment with physical sectors for modern disks 3) Causes partition misalignment with erase blocks on SSDs 4) Windows now defaults to sector 2048 so Disk Utility is behind the times 5) I cannot find any way to change this in Disk utility 6) Disk utility is the dfeault GUI partition editor in Ubuntu I would expect Disk Utility to start the first partition at logical sector 1024 or 2048. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005138 Title: Disk Utility starts partitions at sector 63 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1005138/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 802153] Re: old /wrong starting sektor on new harddrives with 4k
Disk Utility starts the first partition on an MBR formatted disk at sector 63. This is a problem because: 1) There is not enough room for Grub if the OS is installed on RAID and LVM 2) Causes partition misalignment with physical sectors for modern disks 3) Causes partition misalignment with erase blocks on SSDs 4) Windows now defaults to sector 2048 so Disk Utility is behind the times 5) I cannot find any way to change this in Disk utility 6) Disk utility is the default GUI partition editor in Ubuntu I would expect Disk Utility to start the first partition at logical sector 1024 or 2048. I beg to differ that this has low importance. It can lead a user to not being able to reboot their system after an upgrade to 12.04 because the Grub core.img is so huge it no longer fits within 62 sectors if the system has RAID and LVM. THIS WAS REPORTED 1 YEAR AGO and STILL PERSISTS IN UBUNTU 12.04 Good grief. Presumably this is an easy peasy fix so just do it, please, and release an update. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802153 Title: old /wrong starting sektor on new harddrives with 4k To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/802153/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 820500] Re: update-grub generates illegal directive in grub.cfg
Thanks for responding to this report so swiftly. I was just curious as to where the issue resided. Is the grub.cfg stanza syntax erroneous or is it correct and some downstream function at fault? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820500 Title: update-grub generates illegal directive in grub.cfg To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/820500/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 820500] [NEW] update-grub generates illegal directive in grub.cfg
Public bug reported:
Grub 1.99 in Ubuntu 11.04 32-bit desktop. update-grub produces this
stanza in grub.cfg. The set root line is illegal - presumably it should
be set root='(hd0,1)'
menuentry 'Ubuntu, with Linux 2.6.38-8-generic' --class ubuntu --class
gnu-linux --class gnu --class os {
recordfail
set gfxpayload=$linux_gfx_mode
insmod part_msdos
insmod ext2
set root='(/dev/sda,msdos1)'
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root cb4ea337-c67e-4d75-b9fc-7ef2dc864fd0
linux/vmlinuz-2.6.38-8-generic
root=UUID=54d78a76-aabc-4886-82a0-7019e8ae731d ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
initrd/initrd.img-2.6.38-8-generic
}
** Affects: grub (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: 11.04 grub grub.cfg natty update-grub
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820500
Title:
update-grub generates illegal directive in grub.cfg
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub/+bug/820500/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 820500] Re: update-grub generates illegal directive in grub.cfg
This does not cause a boot failure because, it seems, the subsequent search line does find the kernel files. But if that search line is commented out the boot fails. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820500 Title: update-grub generates illegal directive in grub.cfg To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub/+bug/820500/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 794929] [NEW] Disk Utility benchmark, x-axis undefined
Public bug reported: There is no legend to explain what the % value means in the benchmark graph. Nor does palimpsest appear to have a help page. Disk Utility 2.32.1 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/794929 Title: Disk Utility benchmark, x-axis undefined To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/794929/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 794963] [NEW] madam allows growing an array beyond metadata size limitations
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mdadm It is possible to command mdadm to grow an array such that the array space on a component partition exceeds the maximum size writeable in metadata 0.90 format, which is just over 2TB (4 bytes representing sector size). When told to do this, mdadm appears to do it without error and writes a bogus sector count into the 4 byte container in the super-blocks. Now the system operates with the over-enlarged array without apparent issue but only until the next reboot when the system is told the array size based on the superblock value. User data becomes inaccessible/LVMs don't mount with seemingly no way to recover the inaccessible data. Obviously, mdadm should refuse to grow the array size beyond the size restriction of its own metadata. Seen using mdadm - v2.6.7.1 - 15th October 2008 and Ubuntu server 10.04 64-bit ** Affects: mdadm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: mdadm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/794963 Title: madam allows growing an array beyond metadata size limitations To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/794963/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 791181] [NEW] Remote desktop problem with Natty Narwhal
Public bug reported: remote VNC server: Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit desktop using Unity local VNC client: Ubuntu 10.04.2 64-bit desktop Server is running a remote desktop using tightvncserver. Client is viewing the desktop using vinagre. Whenever the client presses the 'd' key all remote desktop display windows minimize. This makes remote admin impossible because the sudo command can never be used. Work-around: on the server, disable the default Keyboard Shortcut that sets 'D' for minimizing/maximizing all windows. I gather that when using remote desktop the server should not interpret all 'd' key presses as shortcuts. I have also reproduced this on Natty in VirtualBox, using its own vinagre to view its own localhost:1 tightvncserver. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791181 Title: Remote desktop problem with Natty Narwhal -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332589] Re: sbackup goes into zombie status
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 550261 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550261 I have Ubuntu 10.0.4.1 server 64 bit Same problem - remotely logged in using tightvncserver/vino and when I press the Backup Now button the GUI freezes. The backup appears to have been done although the resulting files seem a little large - 162G backup of a 75G filesystem(?). I haven't checked what it stored. Anyhow, I managed to kill the process from the command line with: sudo kill -9 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332589 Title: sbackup goes into zombie status -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332589] Re: sbackup goes into zombie status
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 550261 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550261 Oops...my previous post was a little incorrect. I did ask it to back up a lot more than 75G so I have no reason to believe its backup process is faulty. I had not used sbackup until today. Only the freezing GUI is a definite fault. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332589 Title: sbackup goes into zombie status -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 463684] Re: openldap sections in ubuntu server guide not updated for packages in karmic
Trying to get LDAP working on Ubuntu is my worst linux experience yet. Still can't do it. Every tutorial a different, incomprehensible error code. Hours and hours wasted. Someone needs to sort this can of worms out. -- openldap sections in ubuntu server guide not updated for packages in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463684 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 463684] Re: openldap sections in ubuntu server guide not updated for packages in karmic
Trying to get LDAP working on Ubuntu is my worst linux experience yet. Still can't do it. Every tutorial a different, incomprehensible error code. Hours and hours wasted. Someone needs to sort this can of worms out. -- openldap sections in ubuntu server guide not updated for packages in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463684 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574693] Re: nautilus ftp file transfer hangs in lucid
Hi. I can reproduce this hang too. In fact, I first experienced it in 9.04 and reported it. But in 10.04 it is even worse! At least in 9.04 it was possible to kill the Nautilus process and stop the file transfer; now I cannot stop it. Nautilus becomes a Zombie process. Unplugging my LAN cable stopped it...until I plugged it back in again. I do not understand why this fault does not have a HIGH priority. I would have expected any OS problem that requires a reboot to fix would be unacceptable to the Ubuntu developers. My situation is a 10.04 Desktop 64-bit client with a OpenVPN tun tunnel to a 10.04 Server. I use the Places menu to create an SSH connection to the server and get a file browser window. I then drag and drop a 160MB CD iso file on to the server browser window. The File copy window appears but starts off with its progress bar 2/3 complete and remains there. The file transfer actually starts up and data is transferred over the LAN (as shown by System Monitor). But at the far end (viewed using a separate SSH terminal login) the file size seems to be way to big from the start and doesn't change. Nothing happens when I click the red X on the transfer window or try to close it. Killing the Nautilus process does not stop it and the process is shown as zombie. I could not kill the vsftp process on the server (I assume this is the receiving process). I could find no way of stopping the determined LAN activity without restarting. Even then, the restart froze up during theboot and I had to pull the plug and start over. THIS IS A SERIOUS PROBLEM for those of us managing remote servers and trying to do large file transfers. Brian -- nautilus ftp file transfer hangs in lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574693 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
