[Bug 1395427] Re: Sync ufraw 0.20-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
@bhavi: Just a small comment here as I was taking a look at this bug simultaneously as Graham. What is your opinion on the below change from -1 that still exists in the latest debian package * B-D on libtiff-dev rather than libtiff5-dev | libtiff-dev Sorry, I missed your comment. I had looked at this package a couple of weeks ago and it had built successfully in my PPA, so I went ahead and sync'd. It seems that since trusty, libtiff5-dev is the only provider of libtiff-dev, so I can't see this change having any effect. http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty/libtiff-dev -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1395427 Title: Sync ufraw 0.20-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufraw/+bug/1395427/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1395427] Re: Sync ufraw 0.20-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Not particularly but when fetching sources through d/control always the buildd looks at the first package before the or and if its not found fetches the second one and since libtiff5 isnt avalable the previous uploader generalised the change and should have been tracked in debian too I guess Regards Bhavi -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1395427 Title: Sync ufraw 0.20-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufraw/+bug/1395427/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1395427] Re: Sync ufraw 0.20-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Sorry I meant libtiff is no longer there since its a virtual package now and the change would have been other way around :-) So the sync is fine :) Regards Bhavi -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1395427 Title: Sync ufraw 0.20-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufraw/+bug/1395427/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1395427] Re: Sync ufraw 0.20-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
** Changed in: ufraw (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Graham Inggs (ginggs) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1395427 Title: Sync ufraw 0.20-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufraw/+bug/1395427/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1395427] Re: Sync ufraw 0.20-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Just a small comment here as I was taking a look at this bug simultaneously as Graham. What is your opinion on the below change from -1 that still exists in the latest debian package * B-D on libtiff-dev rather than libtiff5-dev | libtiff-dev Regards Bhavi -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1395427 Title: Sync ufraw 0.20-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufraw/+bug/1395427/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1395427] Re: Sync ufraw 0.20-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Is anything damaged by that change?
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Bhavani Shankar right2bshan...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just a small comment here as I was taking a look at this bug
simultaneously as Graham.
What is your opinion on the below change from -1 that still exists in
the latest debian package
* B-D on libtiff-dev rather than libtiff5-dev | libtiff-dev
Regards
Bhavi
--
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1395427
Title:
Sync ufraw 0.20-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Status in “ufraw” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
Please sync ufraw 0.20-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped:
* No change rebuild against new libexiv2-13
* Use dh-autoreconf, resolving FTBFS on newer arches.
Fixed in debian
Changelog entries since current vivid version 0.19.2-2ubuntu2build1:
ufraw (0.20-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version.
* Supports Fuji X-Trans filters (closes: #729026)
-- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:27:30 -0400
ufraw (0.19.2-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload (acked by maintainer)
* Change B-D to libjpeg-dev to finish the transition to libjpeg-turbo
(Closes: #763496)
-- Ondřej Surý ond...@debian.org Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:07:29 +0200
ufraw (0.19.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/rules: run dh-autoreconf to update config.{sub, guess} and
{libtool, aclocal}.m4 Patch by Breno Leitao. (closes: #756313)
* debian/copyright: add copyright info and update to GPLv2+
* debian/control: depend on lcms2
* Apply patches from upstream CVS for lcms2 support. (closes: #757823)
-- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:55:45 -0400
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufraw/+bug/1395427/+subscriptions
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1395427
Title:
Sync ufraw 0.20-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufraw/+bug/1395427/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1395427] Re: Sync ufraw 0.20-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
This bug was fixed in the package ufraw - 0.20-1
Sponsored for Jackson Doak (noskcaj)
---
ufraw (0.20-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version.
* Supports Fuji X-Trans filters (closes: #729026)
-- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:27:30 -0400
ufraw (0.19.2-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload (acked by maintainer)
* Change B-D to libjpeg-dev to finish the transition to libjpeg-turbo
(Closes: #763496)
-- Ondřej Surý ond...@debian.org Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:07:29 +0200
ufraw (0.19.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/rules: run dh-autoreconf to update config.{sub, guess} and
{libtool, aclocal}.m4 Patch by Breno Leitao. (closes: #756313)
* debian/copyright: add copyright info and update to GPLv2+
* debian/control: depend on lcms2
* Apply patches from upstream CVS for lcms2 support. (closes: #757823)
-- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:55:45 -0400
** Changed in: ufraw (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1395427
Title:
Sync ufraw 0.20-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufraw/+bug/1395427/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
