[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2009-03-25 Thread Scott James Remnant
The current issue with renaming after an upgrade to jaunty is being
tracked as bug #329106

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2009-03-25 Thread geb
my network card was listed as eth2, i just changed it to eth0...fix
worked for me

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2009-03-21 Thread Akkana Peck
Seems to be worse in jaunty. I upgraded from hardy to intrepid with no 
networking difficulties, but I just upgraded the same machine from intrepid to 
jaunty and had no network, because udev renamed eth0 to eth1. I removed 
70-persistent-net.rules and rebooted, and that fixed the problem.
(See also bugs 208103, 153727 etc.)

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2009-03-13 Thread blackest_knight
I've just experienced a similar issue on intrepid my eth0 was reported
as eth8 it may be because this systems been rebuilt and moved between
pc's a few times over the years and had several different network cards
hopefully renaming eth8 eth0 and deleting the other entries cures the
issue (it seem too)

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2008-02-27 Thread tji
I realized after my previous message that this bug relates to Gutsy in
general, and not just the JeOS version..

My comment was specific to the JeOS build, which operates in a
fundamentally different environment as a Virtual Machine, which leads to
issues with the virtual NIC devices being a lot more dynamic than
physical NIC devices.

For example, if a VM is cloned, moved to another host, or even has some
seemingly unrelated change made to its configuration, the MAC address of
the VM can change - causing loss of connectivity for the VM on the next
reboot, in a way that is non-trivial to diagnose.

The scenarios described above are from my experience with VMware ESX,
and may not come into play with Xen, KVM, MS Viridian, or others.

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2008-02-27 Thread tji
Aside from the busybox issue..Isn't the udev net persistence feature
going to cause a lot more problems than it solves?

As I understand it,  it is recording the MAC address of the NIC, and
associating that with an ethernet interface.  So, that if the order the
NICs are initialized in changes, the association of NIC to eth device
stays the same.This works fine in a physical server, where the
expectation is that hardware changes are unlikely.  But, in a VM
environment, the MAC address can change when changes are made to the
Virtual Machine configuration, or the location of the VM, etc.

As it is now,  any time he MAC changes, the user will lose connectivity,
because it is now treated as eth1, rather than eth0, which has no
configuration.

This feature of udev should be turned off in the JeOS build, as it
causes problems in common VM usage.   Or, some additional logic could
help it to do its job better, such as:

- If only one NIC exists in the box, don't worry about order/mapping, treat it 
as eth0 (solves a large percentage of problems)
- If the old MAC address doesn't exist anymore, don't hold the 
reservation/mapping.

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-12-28 Thread Ubuntu QA Tracker
** Tags added: iso-testing

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-12-15 Thread vonHalenbach
Oh sorry! Then i did falsely dupe it. I thought they were the same
issues leading to no working network. Please un-dupe 153727 then.

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-12-15 Thread Uphaar Agrawalla
Bug 153727 has been marked duplicate of this bug, and this bug is marked
Invalid. The issue in 153727 is same as Nego's issue, which Steve
indicates is a separate issue. The bug is very much present in Gutsy
Final (with all updates). Why was 153727 marked as a duplicate of this
bug then?

Should I re-open this bug, or un-dupe 153727?

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-22 Thread gromituk
I've had the same problem after updating a Kubuntu desktop machine to
Gutsy last night.  This morning, after rebooting, the single ethernet
card with a static address had "disappeared".  Over the telephone I
confirmed that there was one "SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*"... line
(don't know if it contained a MAC address or not), which, when removed
and the machine rebooted, resulted in the ethernet card working again.

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-19 Thread Southernman
It is a hack work around found through google, but it solved the problem
with the adapter changing on each reboot... when using a static IP.

Remove all lines of various eth0, eth1, eth2 and so on and replace them
with this line:

SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="forcedeth", NAME="eth0"

Adjust your driver, and the name of the adapter as you need it / want
it.

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-10 Thread NEGO
Look for 



IRQ 16
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   24.812477] PCI: Setting latency timer of 
device :00:02.0 to 64
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   24.812480] ohci_hcd :00:02.0: OHCI Host 
Controller
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   24.812677] ohci_hcd :00:02.0: new USB bus 
registered, assigned bus number 1
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   24.812697] ohci_hcd :00:02.0: irq 16, io 
mem 0xdb003000
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   24.863605] forcedeth.c: Reverse Engineered 
nForce ethernet driver. Version 0.60.
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   24.875982] usb usb1: configuration #1 chosen 
from 1 choice
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   24.876016] hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   24.876029] hub 1-0:1.0: 3 ports detected
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   24.938707] 8139too Fast Ethernet driver 0.9.28
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   24.964401] SCSI subsystem initialized
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   24.969282] libata version 2.21 loaded.
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   24.978157] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APCG] 
enabled at IRQ 21
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   24.978167] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:02.1[B] 
-> Link [APCG] -> GSI 21 (level, high) -> IRQ 17
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   24.978184] PCI: Setting latency timer of 
device :00:02.1 to 64
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   24.978187] ohci_hcd :00:02.1: OHCI Host 
Controller
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   24.978213] ohci_hcd :00:02.1: new USB bus 
registered, assigned bus number 2
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   24.978232] ohci_hcd :00:02.1: irq 17, io 
mem 0xdb004000
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.035799] usb usb2: configuration #1 chosen 
from 1 choice
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.035835] hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.035847] hub 2-0:1.0: 3 ports detected
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.057005] Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.112585] FDC 0 is a post-1991 82077
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.139730] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APCH] 
enabled at IRQ 20
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.139741] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:04.0[A] 
-> Link [APCH] -> GSI 20 (level, high) -> IRQ 18
  Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.139748] PCI: Setting latency timer of 
 device :00:04.0 to 64
  Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.139773] :00:04.0: Invalid Mac 
 address detected: 00:00:00:00:00:00
  Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.139777] Please complain to your 
 hardware vendor. Switching to a random MAC.
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.281452] usb 1-1: new full speed USB device 
using ohci_hcd and address 2
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.491344] usb 1-1: configuration #1 chosen 
from 1 choice
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.657393] eth0: forcedeth.c: subsystem: 
01043:80a7 bound to :00:04.0
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.657831] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APCL] 
enabled at IRQ 22
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.657835] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:02.2[C] 
-> Link [APCL] -> GSI 22 (level, high) -> IRQ 16
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.657848] PCI: Setting latency timer of 
device :00:02.2 to 64
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.657852] ehci_hcd :00:02.2: EHCI Host 
Controller
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.657889] ehci_hcd :00:02.2: new USB bus 
registered, assigned bus number 3
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.657927] ehci_hcd :00:02.2: debug port 1
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.657932] PCI: cache line size of 64 is not 
supported by device :00:02.2
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.657940] ehci_hcd :00:02.2: irq 16, io 
mem 0xdb005000
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.657947] ehci_hcd :00:02.2: USB 2.0 
started, EHCI 1.00, driver 10 Dec 2004
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.657984] usb 1-1: USB disconnect, address 2
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.658276] usb usb3: configuration #1 chosen 
from 1 choice
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.658301] hub 3-0:1.0: USB hub found
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.658308] hub 3-0:1.0: 6 ports detected
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.761476] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APC1] 
enabled at IRQ 16
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.761486] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :01:0a.0[A] 
-> Link [APC1] -> GSI 16 (level, high) -> IRQ 19
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.761944] eth1: RealTek RTL8139 at 
0xf883c000, 00:60:67:76:cc:67, IRQ 19
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.761947] eth1:  Identified 8139 chip type 
'RTL-8139B'
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.763600] 8139cp: 10/100 PCI Ethernet driver 
v1.3 (Mar 22, 2004)
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.767716] Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver 
Revision: 7.00alpha2
Oct  4 20:27:06 NEGA kernel: [   25.767722] ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus 
speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notif

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-10 Thread NEGO
Good I show the information of my file here

70-persistent-net.rules

# This cases out was automatically generated by the /lib/udev/write_net_rules
# program, probably run by the persistent-net-generator.rules rules cases out.
#
# You dog modify it, ace long ace you keep each rule on to single line.

# First Resumption

# This device is “A7N8X Mainboard onboard nForce2 Ethernet” (Connected with 
modem ADSL)
# PCI device 0x10de: 0x0066 (forcedeth)
SUBSYSTEM== " net ", DRIVERS== "? * ", ATTRS {address} == " 00: 00: 6c: 88: 0c: 
1d ", NAME= " eth0 "

# This Device is “Realtek RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+” (Not connected)
# PCI device 0x10ec: 0x8139 (8139too)
SUBSYSTEM== " net ", DRIVERS== "? * ", ATTRS {address} == " 00: 60: 67: 76: cc: 
67 ", NAME= " eth1 "

# Second Resumption

# This device is “A7N8X Mainboard onboard nForce2 Ethernet” (Connected with 
modem ADSL)
# PCI device 0x10de: 0x0066 (forcedeth)
SUBSYSTEM== " net ", DRIVERS== "? * ", ATTRS {address} == " 00: 00: 6c: 07: c6: 
dc ", NAME= " eth2 "


# These are my commentaries
# This device is “A7N8X Mainboard onboard nForce2 Ethernet” (Connected with 
modem ADSL)
# PCI device 0x10de: 0x0066 (forcedeth)
#SUBSYSTEM== " net ", DRIVERS== "? * ", ATTRS {address} == " This changes with 
each resumption ", NAME= " eth (here to him it is added of a 1) “


As address can see in the device nvidia mac changes with each
resumption, which can cause that a new device is detected as and changes
their name.

the partial solution of this problem is to erase the file 70-persistent-
net.rules before extinguishing or reinitiating.

This I do it with a thrower who has east commando (I sweat rm
/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules)

I wait for this is of aid to solve the problem to them.

I make emphasis that at some time of the beginning of the system gets to
read that there is an error in the MAC address of this device which
generates one random one.

This! No! it happens in version 7.04

He is exclusive of version 7.10 until the compilation of the 4 of
October of the 2007

** Attachment added: "70-persistent-net.rules"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9943089/70-persistent-net.rules

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-10 Thread NEGO
First, I request excuses by the badly English.
It is translation of google.

The problem in my case related to the connection of the network devices,
is that in each resumption the card that this connected changes its
name. the file 70-persistent-net.rules adds a 1 to him to the name

This implies that in the following resumption I do not have coneccion to
Internet because the changed device to left connected to of name.

In some beginning of way text and gotten to read an error of mac adres
therefore generates a direction fictitious this can be the cause of the
error.

the card that generates the problem is onboard of mother ASUS A7N8X 2.0

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-10 Thread Brian Murray
Jan - This bug's state is one of Fix Released meaning that the bug is
fixed and that you should not see it on a daily build of the server ISO
images nor on the RC image when it comes out.

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 01:35:51PM -, Jan Kunder wrote:
> NEGO:
> Pls escribe en inglés (básico es bastante:)
> Si no hablar inglés ningún pequeño pedacito:
> Escribirlo en español (como)
> uso: http://www.google.com/translate_t?langpair=es |en
> y GOMA del copy en IGUAL comenta. Agradece:)

I'm afraid this doesn't come out as comprehensible Spanish when passed
through google translator; which is ok, because that means what you've said
here wasn't a recommendation to use it so the commentor is unlikely to rely
on it. ;)

As I noted earlier, NEGO's followup was about some unrelated bug.  That
should be submitted as a separate report, probably with the help of a LoCo
for translation assistance because google translate is simply not usable for
this.  I would have happily told him this in Spanish, but he doesn't appear
to be subscribed to the bug and has no email contact information in LP...

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-10 Thread Jan Kunder
Workaround/HINT::
1. comment EVERYTHING in /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
2. add:
## PCI device ONBOARD intel 10/100
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:bb:05:14:85:56", 
NAME="eth0"
# PCI device 0x8086:0x1229 (e100)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:a0:cc:d0:00:43", 
NAME="eth1"
##xyz blah
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="", NAME="eth7"
3. correct MAC adresses and descriptions (IMHO NOT needed)
(u can get MACs: sudo ifconfig -a)
*OR::
sudo mv /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules 
/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules.BAKKK
sudo reboot

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-10 Thread Jan Kunder
Hi.
I vote this to be nominated for RC(!) Gutsy release.
This is very dangerous, annoying 95% (or more) of installer, and I think&hope - 
easy to repair. It IS working on other distros: feisty, Etch, Sarge, FC5+6+7 ...
Thanks much anyone.

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-10 Thread Jan Kunder
HASAN::

IMHO yes:: delete "your lines".

And add these:
## PCI device ONBOARD intel 10/100
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:bb:05:14:85:56", 
NAME="eth0"
# PCI device 0x8086:0x1229 (e100)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:a0:cc:d0:00:43", 
NAME="eth1"
##xyz blah
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="", NAME="eth7"

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-10 Thread Jan Kunder
NEGO:
Pls write in English (basic is enough :)
If do NOT speak english any little bit:
Write it in Spanish (as you did)
use: http://www.google.com/translate_t?langpair=es|en
and COPY PASTE it in the SAME comment. Thanks :)
**

NEGO:
Pls escribe en inglés (básico es bastante:)
Si no hablar inglés ningún pequeño pedacito:
Escribirlo en español (como)
uso: http://www.google.com/translate_t?langpair=es |en
y GOMA del copy en IGUAL comenta. Agradece:)

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-09 Thread Vinicius
I can confirm this bug in Gutsy 7.10 server beta when installing it in a
VmWare virtual machine running over a GSX server.

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-06 Thread hasan
What does this section of /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules do?

=
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="", NAME="eth0"

SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="", NAME="eth0"

SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="", NAME="eth0"

SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="", NAME="eth0"

SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="", NAME="eth0
==
Can I just delete it?

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-04 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: udev (Ubuntu)
   Target: ubuntu-7.10-rc => None

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-02 Thread Steve Langasek
fixed in busybox, marking as invalid for udev.

The last followup in Spanish seems to report an unrelated bug, since it
states that it affects desktop installs and happens after each reboot,
not just at install time.

** Changed in: udev (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-02 Thread NEGO
Bueno yo de ingles nada pero la compilacion del 1 de octubre y este error se 
viene arrastrando desde el beta 5
No solo para la version server tambien para la version Desktop.
Al reiniciar el sistema reasigna nombre del dispositivo de red.
Esto implica tener que correr el pppoeconf para conectarse a internet con cada 
reinicio.

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-02 Thread Colin Watson
busybox (1:1.1.3-5ubuntu5) gutsy; urgency=low

  * Move test and friends to /bin (LP: #145382).

 -- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   Tue, 02 Oct 2007 19:52:41 +0100

** Changed in: busybox (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-02 Thread Colin Watson
Apparently I misunderstood and the problem is that [ is in /usr/bin.
Reopening busybox task.

** Changed in: busybox (Ubuntu)
   Status: Won't Fix => Confirmed

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-01 Thread Jan Kunder
I can confirm the bug.
It happend 28.09.07 10:18 GMT.
On my "new" P233MMX proxy and (SJ36=MM) 1GHz Celeron+256MB + i815E + 
onboard_100Mbit + intelPCI_100Mbit.
I was lucky I was nearby all of the machines. I landed with Gutsy.beta1 on both 
of them without any ethX (respectively with eth2+eth3) (eth0+1 in interfaces).
After I MANUALLY edited MACs addr. in /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules 
- everythings run fine.
Thanks to my backup Etch :)

It is VERY interesting for me, that X was "randomly"(?) choosen. Before
I found a bug - there was no MAC in /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-
net.rules, but after 2nd reboot I had eth5 and eth6, then eth7&8, then
3&4 ...

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-10-01 Thread Colin Watson
Scott, I'm not going to build [ into busybox's /bin/sh (there's no
support for this in busybox at the moment and the one relevant
configuration option is far too invasive for this - it affects all
busybox applets). Please change udev-udeb to use a full PATH rather than
just /lib/udev.

** Changed in: busybox (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Watson (kamion)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-09-30 Thread celil
Thanks Jim,
the patch for /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules fixed the problem for 
me. I used the alternate CD to install a command based distribution on an old 
computer.

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-09-30 Thread Jim Tarvid
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# diff /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules 
70-persistent-net.rules 
13c13
< SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:16:ec:6e:e1:fd", 
NAME="eth0"
---
> SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:16:ec:6e:e1:fd", 
> NAME="eth1"

and

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# diff /etc/network/interfaces interfaces 
9,13c9,13
< auto eth0
< iface eth0 inet static
< address 192.168.20.14
< netmask 255.255.255.0
< gateway 192.168.20.1
---
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet dhcp


and a reboot seems to fix the problem of static assignment on a single network 
interface

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-09-29 Thread Jim Tarvid
I can confirm this happens on a gutsy server beta install here.

 
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="", NAME="eth0"

SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="", NAME="eth0"

SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="", NAME="eth0"

SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="", NAME="eth0"

SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="", NAME="eth0"

# PCI device 0x1106:0x3065 (via-rhine)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:16:ec:6e:e1:fd", 
NAME="eth1"
70-persistent-net.rules (END)

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-09-28 Thread Scott James Remnant
This is caused by the installer's busybox /bin/sh not having the [
built-in, so the write_net_rules shell script doesn't actually work
properly

** Also affects: busybox (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-09-27 Thread Timo Aaltonen
We use static network settings, and after installation the 70
-persistent-net.rules has seven lines like this:

SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="", NAME="eth0"

and no line with a MAC-address. The computer only has one interface. If
I remove those lines, the network is brought up on boot.

** Changed in: udev (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-09-26 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: udev (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High
   Target: None => ubuntu-7.10-rc

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 145382] Re: [Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules

2007-09-26 Thread Stéphane Graber
Lars Wirzenius had a similar issue with Ubuntu Alternate.

Described as comment here :
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/134496

-- 
[Gutsy] broken 70-persistent-net.rules
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145382
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs