[Bug 50387] Re: Default privacy settings don't respect privacy

2008-09-14 Thread Harald Sitter
I am so closing this report right now :P

In  2 years no one seemed affected enough to do anything about this
complaint, so I guess it is really just paranoia, like Tonio said.

** Changed in: kdenetwork (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix

** Changed in: kdenetwork (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Almost Kubuntu Bugs (kubuntu-team) = (unassigned)

-- 
Default privacy settings don't respect privacy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50387
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Almost
Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdenetwork in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 50387] Re: Default privacy settings don't respect privacy

2006-08-30 Thread Anthony Mercatante
I must say I totally disagree that kubuntu meeting decision.
To me there is no point calling this privacy respect.

This is probably more paranoia and honnestly, goes against simplicity and 
usability.
Would you like everyone, including noobs and non-geek users to manually set 
their status everytime they come in front off the computer ? First, they won't, 
but they'll probably think kopete simply sucks because it doesn't support 
something that is a common setting in all IM arround the world.

If providing the status is a privacy violation, it is probably better to
unplug any network cable, since even an IP address gives more
informations than this with ICMP...

Concerning problems A or B, MSN, ICQ, YIM or AIM are already supporting this 
kind of functionnalities and that globally feets with the needs of the masse.
Why are they so successfull while Google Talk isn't ? Because of those 
functionnalities.

The purpose of an instant messenger is to be simple, almost automatic,
and give informations instantly.

Beeing informed that the remove guy is typing something (problem B) is
very usefull cause it makes the discussion more interactive. I will wait
in that case to post again since my next message could depend what the
guy is saying.

Those functions can be deactivated for the *rare* personns who
appreciate to control everything on their machine and that are concerned
by any kind of informations their software can provide.

But reguarding making that a default setting is a simplicity regression
and functionnalities regression.

I would really appreciate this to be re-discussed during the next
meeting, since I really think changing those settings would be a very
critisized decission when edgy is out.

-- 
Default privacy settings don't respect privacy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50387

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 50387] Re: Default privacy settings don't respect privacy

2006-08-17 Thread Kenny Duffus
** Changed in: kdenetwork (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Untriaged = Medium

-- 
Default privacy settings don't respect privacy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50387

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 50387] Re: Default privacy settings don't respect privacy

2006-06-26 Thread Jonathan Riddell
General consensus at kubuntu meeting was to agree with A and B but C is
no worse than web browser ident.  Subscribing tonio, our kubuntu-
default-settings hero.

-- 
Default privacy settings don't respect privacy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50387

--
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 50387] Re: Default privacy settings don't respect privacy

2006-06-21 Thread railk
A seems normal enough to me, as it's meant so friends can see whether I'm 
available to answer they're instant message.
B... I like the bit where chat partners can see whether i'm typing anything, I 
do find that generally useful. Delivered notifications is also fine I guess, 
since my partner might be interested whether I'm getting his messages or not. 
The other option, the displayed notification, seems rather excessive...
C, I also fail to see the rationale behind this feature of the jabber protocol. 
The point of the protocol is that it is universally the same, what difference 
does it make which client or OS I'm using?
However I accept that all 5 options here are invasion of privacy, however 
minor, so if a high level of privacy is a target of the defaults, then all 5 
options should be disabled. If, on the other hand, a target is similarity to 
other clients of the protocols, I guess they should be left enabled.

For the record, MSN accounts in Kopete also have such privacy options.
Send client information is ticked by default, and the What's this? entry 
recommends that it is left ticked (no reason given).
Send typing notifications is also ticked by default
and Expose my Jabber account to other users, also ticked by default if you 
have a jabber account with your account's ID entered in the associated box.

-- 
Default privacy settings don't respect privacy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50387

--
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 50387] Re: Default privacy settings don't respect privacy

2006-06-20 Thread Kenny Duffus
Personally I'd have thought A and B were the normal settings and see no
problem with them, as it is me the user that adds contacts for
communicating with, so sharing info with people that you have chosen to
communicate with doesn't sound bad

-- 
Default privacy settings don't respect privacy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50387

--
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 50387] Re: Default privacy settings don't respect privacy

2006-06-20 Thread Lorenzo J. Lucchini
*Communicate*. The natural assumption (at least *my* natural assumption)
is that by adding an user, the information I will share with them will
be the *messages I send to them*.

I will also share my online status (offline, online, available,
etc.), but I can choose that status from a very clearly visible chooser
in the main Kopete window.

Any other information buried into nested configuration dialogs is *not*,
in my opinion, a kind of information-sharing that is natural of an
instant messenger.

Let's make a comparison: when I choose to register online a product that
I have downloaded or bought, I am certainly *not* expecting it to send
information listing, say, all the programs that I have on my machine or
the contents or the contents of my filesystem --- even though I am
voluntarly enaging in information sharing with the software product's
maker.

-- 
Default privacy settings don't respect privacy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50387

--
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 50387] Re: Default privacy settings don't respect privacy

2006-06-20 Thread Kenny Duffus
I haven't seen any evidence from your bug report that kopete is sending
information listing all the programs that you have on your machine or
the contents of your filesystem, if that is the case then please update
the bug description.

-- 
Default privacy settings don't respect privacy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50387

--
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 50387] Re: Default privacy settings don't respect privacy

2006-06-20 Thread Lorenzo J. Lucchini
I'm sorry, English is not my native language. I must not have made it
clear enough that I was making a parallel, a comparison. I was.

-- 
Default privacy settings don't respect privacy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50387

--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 50387] Re: Default privacy settings don't respect privacy

2006-06-19 Thread Frode M. Doeving
I agree with all problems and can confirm the behavior. 
This is also true for the MSN protocol.

Problem B is especially a bad default in my opinion.

Is this something we can set in kubuntu-default-settings? Or does the
fact that this is per-account settings make problems?

-- 
Default privacy settings don't respect privacy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50387

--
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 50387] Re: Default privacy settings don't respect privacy

2006-06-19 Thread Frode M. Doeving
assigning and confirming.

** Changed in: kdenetwork (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Kubuntu Team
   Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed

-- 
Default privacy settings don't respect privacy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/50387

--
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs