[Bug 530524] Re: RFE: please allow for exclusion of caching for certain domains (doc improvement pending, 0.4.5-1)

2010-07-14 Thread Felix Geyer
This bug was fixed in apt-cacher-ng 0.4.9-2

---
apt-cacher-ng (0.4.9-2) unstable; urgency=low

  * Minor change to support Ubuntu release notes delivery with GET
parameters (closes: #588662)

 -- Eduard Bloch bl...@debian.org Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:06:49 +0200

apt-cacher-ng (0.4.9-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream version
+ fixes LFS settings inconsistencies (closes: #588048), thanks
  to M. Vefa Bicakci

 -- Eduard Bloch bl...@debian.org Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:59:21 +0200

apt-cacher-ng (0.4.8-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream version
+ fixes FTBFS with recent glibc (Ubuntu bug 596452)
+ adds ddeb files to package filter (Ubuntu bug 596075)
+ allow pass-through mode for specified domains/URLs (Ubuntu bug 530524)
+ modified regex creation (only at startup time now), may be a workaround
  for Debian bug #571536, Ubuntu bugs 523408, 532353, 585957

 -- Eduard Bloch bl...@debian.org Fri, 02 Jul 2010 08:40:07 +0200

** Changed in: apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
RFE: please allow for exclusion of caching for certain domains (doc improvement 
pending, 0.4.5-1)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530524
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 530524] Re: RFE: please allow for exclusion of caching for certain domains (doc improvement pending, 0.4.5-1)

2010-05-23 Thread Eduard Bloch
Oh sorry, I misread caching for certain domains as caching of certain
domains...

Actually, that's a good idea. I think we should use regular expressions,
there you can set a filter to the beginning of the string (i.e. the
Domain name you wanted), or  some string that people put into their
local rebuilds' versions, or a common part of the name of some local
project, whatever.

Maybe some directive like:

# Data is not stored on the disk if the download URL is matched successfully 
against one of these regular 
# expressions.
# 
# DontCache: localversionsuffix.*\.deb 192.168.3 ^10\.0\.0\.1
#
# Advanced usage:
# The file:listfile.txt syntax is supported to get the strings from an 
external file.
# If the config value contains two parts (semicolon separated) then the left is 
applied to incomming request 
# URLs, the right part to outgoing download URLs.


What do you think?

-- 
RFE: please allow for exclusion of caching for certain domains (doc improvement 
pending, 0.4.5-1)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530524
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 530524] Re: RFE: please allow for exclusion of caching for certain domains (doc improvement pending, 0.4.5-1)

2010-05-03 Thread Rolf Leggewie
DnsCacheSeconds doesn't really have anything to do with it.  I was
referring not to cache deb files, etc. from certain hosts and IP
(because they are local for example).

Again, feel free to set to wontfix if you think such an option would be
bloat.

** Changed in: apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed = Confirmed

-- 
RFE: please allow for exclusion of caching for certain domains (doc improvement 
pending, 0.4.5-1)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530524
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 530524] Re: RFE: please allow for exclusion of caching for certain domains

2010-03-06 Thread Daniel Hahler
This has been documented in 0.4.5-1 (Debian), but should work already in 
previous versions.
Thanks.

** Changed in: apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

** Changed in: apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Wishlist

** Summary changed:

- RFE: please allow for exclusion of caching for certain domains
+ RFE: please allow for exclusion of caching for certain domains (doc 
improvement pending)

** Summary changed:

- RFE: please allow for exclusion of caching for certain domains (doc 
improvement pending)
+ RFE: please allow for exclusion of caching for certain domains (doc 
improvement pending, 0.4.5-1)

-- 
RFE: please allow for exclusion of caching for certain domains (doc improvement 
pending, 0.4.5-1)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530524
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 530524] Re: RFE: please allow for exclusion of caching for certain domains

2010-03-02 Thread Rolf Leggewie
I just found http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/177 and it
should be easy enough for the clients to bypass apt-cacher-ng when
accessing that host

Acquire::http::Proxy::$host DIRECT;

I would be OK with Eduard closing this ticket as wontfix or changing it
into a question so the next person looking for this kind of information
can easily find it.

-- 
RFE: please allow for exclusion of caching for certain domains
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530524
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 530524] Re: RFE: please allow for exclusion of caching for certain domains

2010-03-02 Thread Eduard Bloch
Oops, I just realized that I forgot to document something :-(

What you want is the DnsCacheSeconds option (value range: positive
integers), which you can set to 10 or something, in acng.conf (or some
other .conf file in the config dir, of course).

-- 
RFE: please allow for exclusion of caching for certain domains
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530524
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs