[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
** Changed in: glusterfs Importance: Unknown => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 Title: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
I removed the proposed package, as there has been no feeback in over three months, and we need to clear the queues for 10.04.2. ** Changed in: glusterfs (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 Title: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
We stopped using GlusterFS as it was deemed too much of a risk. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 Title: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
Any testers of the proposed lucid package? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 Title: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/lucid-proposed/glusterfs -- Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
Accepted glusterfs into lucid-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! ** Tags added: verification-needed -- Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
Another link for my own benefit http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html -- Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
** Changed in: glusterfs Status: Unknown => Fix Released -- Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
Just a link for my benefit to see recent lucid-proposed uploads: http://www.ubuntuupdates.org/package_logs?type=sources&vals=325 -- Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
** Patch removed: "glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/666494/+attachment/1711751/+files/glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff ** Patch removed: "glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/666494/+attachment/1711960/+files/glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff ** Patch removed: "glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/666494/+attachment/1711992/+files/glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff ** Patch removed: "glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/666494/+attachment/1712001/+files/glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
** Changed in: glusterfs (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: New => Fix Committed -- Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
No problem. Hope to see more debdiffs from you soon :) Uploaded to lucid-proposed, pending SRU team review. (Subscribed Ubuntu- sru). -- Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
Thanks for helping me with my first debdiff ever, Stefano Rivera. :) Here's the updated debdiff again. ** Patch added: "glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/666494/+attachment/1712381/+files/glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
The test case and regression potential belong in the description of this bug, not the patch. > * debian/patches/1-fix-data-corruption-bug.patch: LP #666494 It's still missing a colon after the LP, and it could use a description. I'd do this: * 1-fix-data-corruption-bug.patch: Backport typo bugfix patch. LP: #666494 > -- nutznboltz I'd prefer a real name. > +## Description: data corruption when using GlusterFS with certain options > set. > +## Origin/Author: > http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=639 > +## TEST CASE: http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=639 > +## Regression potential: none known I'd remove the second two lines of that, and remove "/Author", you are giving the origin not the author. -- Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
Another slight improvement to the comments in the patch. The "impact:" field has been renamed to "Description:". ** Patch added: "glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/666494/+attachment/1712001/+files/glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
Didn't see the part about marking test cases as "TEST CASE:" until a moment ago. Updated debdiff regarding that. ** Patch added: "glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/666494/+attachment/1711992/+files/glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
debdiff updated as requested. ** Patch added: "glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/666494/+attachment/1711960/+files/glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
Thanks. This just needs some tweaks before it can be uploaded: > +## Description: add some description > +## Origin/Author: add some origin or author > +## Bug: bug URL Would you mind updating those to actually have content? Can you also provide a test case (as required by https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates ). I understand that this might not be possible for this bug, but that should then be noted. > +glusterfs (3.0.2-1ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low Can you change that version number to 3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1 and target it at lucid-proposed? > + * debian/patches/1-fix-data-corruption-bug.patch: Fixes LP 666494 The correct syntax to close a bug is LP: #666494. "Fixes" is not required. > + -- nutznboltz Can you provide a real name? Normally adding a patchsystem to Debian packages is not the recommended approach, but as this is an SRU, it seems like a good enough method to me. -- Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
** Also affects: glusterfs (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: glusterfs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: glusterfs (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided => High -- Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
Debdiff with patch from upstream. ** Patch added: "glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/666494/+attachment/1711751/+files/glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff ** Description changed: Impact: data corruption when using GlusterFS with certain options set. - Patch: http://patches.gluster.com/patch/2781/ + Patch: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/666494/+attachment/1711751/+files/glusterfs_3.0.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff Reproducing: http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=639 Regression potential: none known As an interim fix I did a backport of GlusterFS 3.0.4 from Maverick to Lucid https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/glusterfs3 so my systems are safe. This is the upstream Changelog message: commit c55134fc0c5ebe952de12757d5c53d463a9c21b5 Author: Anand Avati Date: Thu Feb 18 10:28:06 2010 + server_writev: add proper iobuf into iobref this typo results in corruption when write-behind is loaded on server side Signed-off-by: Anand V. Avati Signed-off-by: Anand V. Avati BUG: 639 (Data corruption with write-behind on server side) URL: http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=639 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: glusterfs-server (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Oct 25 16:24:24 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100427.1) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: glusterfs -- Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
Hi, you subscribed ubuntu-sponsors, but there's no clear action for us, so I've unsubscribed sponsors for now. Please resubscribe when there's an upload requiring sponsorship. What exactly are you requesting? An SRU patch for the version in lucid? If so please nominate this bug for lucid. Can you prepare a debdiff / bzr branch for SRUing? -- Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
** Bug watch added: bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/ #639 http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=639 ** Also affects: glusterfs via http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=639 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
** Description changed: Impact: data corruption when using GlusterFS with certain options set. Patch: http://patches.gluster.com/patch/2781/ Reproducing: http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=639 Regression potential: none known - - I was looking through the Changelog of GlusterFS 3.0.4 to find new items - since GlusterFS 3.0.2 and I found a data corruption bug. I went back to - the package in Lucid which is based on glusterfs_3.0.2-1.debian and I - could not find evidence that this bug was fixed there. As an interim fix I did a backport of GlusterFS 3.0.4 from Maverick to Lucid https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/glusterfs3 so my systems are safe. This is the upstream Changelog message: commit c55134fc0c5ebe952de12757d5c53d463a9c21b5 Author: Anand Avati Date: Thu Feb 18 10:28:06 2010 + server_writev: add proper iobuf into iobref this typo results in corruption when write-behind is loaded on server side Signed-off-by: Anand V. Avati Signed-off-by: Anand V. Avati BUG: 639 (Data corruption with write-behind on server side) URL: http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=639 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: glusterfs-server (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Oct 25 16:24:24 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100427.1) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: glusterfs -- Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 666494] Re: Data Corruption bug in GlusterFS 3.0.2
** Description changed: + Impact: possible data corruption when using GlusterFS with certain options set. + Patch: TBD + Reproducing: http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=639 + Regression potential: none known + I was looking through the Changelog of GlusterFS 3.0.4 to find new items since GlusterFS 3.0.2 and I found a data corruption bug. I went back to the package in Lucid which is based on glusterfs_3.0.2-1.debian and I could not find evidence that this bug was fixed there. As an interim fix I did a backport of GlusterFS 3.0.4 from Maverick to Lucid https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/glusterfs3 so my systems are safe. This is the upstream Changelog message: commit c55134fc0c5ebe952de12757d5c53d463a9c21b5 Author: Anand Avati Date: Thu Feb 18 10:28:06 2010 + - server_writev: add proper iobuf into iobref + server_writev: add proper iobuf into iobref - this typo results in corruption when write-behind is loaded on + this typo results in corruption when write-behind is loaded on server side - Signed-off-by: Anand V. Avati - Signed-off-by: Anand V. Avati + Signed-off-by: Anand V. Avati + Signed-off-by: Anand V. Avati - BUG: 639 (Data corruption with write-behind on server side) - URL: http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=639 + BUG: 639 (Data corruption with write-behind on server side) + URL: http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=639 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: glusterfs-server (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Oct 25 16:24:24 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100427.1) ProcEnviron: - LANG=en_US.utf8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + LANG=en_US.utf8 + SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: glusterfs ** Description changed: Impact: possible data corruption when using GlusterFS with certain options set. - Patch: TBD + Patch: http://patches.gluster.com/patch/2781/ Reproducing: http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=639 Regression potential: none known I was looking through the Changelog of GlusterFS 3.0.4 to find new items since GlusterFS 3.0.2 and I found a data corruption bug. I went back to the package in Lucid which is based on glusterfs_3.0.2-1.debian and I could not find evidence that this bug was fixed there. As an interim fix I did a backport of GlusterFS 3.0.4 from Maverick to Lucid https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/glusterfs3 so my systems are safe. This is the upstream Changelog message: commit c55134fc0c5ebe952de12757d5c53d463a9c21b5 Author: Anand Avati Date: Thu Feb 18 10:28:06 2010 + server_writev: add proper iobuf into iobref this typo results in corruption when write-behind is loaded on server side Signed-off-by: Anand V. Avati Signed-off-by: Anand V. Avati BUG: 639 (Data corruption with write-behind on server side) URL: http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=639 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: glusterfs-server (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Oct 25 16:24:24 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100427.1) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: glusterfs ** Description changed: - Impact: possible data corruption when using GlusterFS with certain options set. + Impact: data corruption when using GlusterFS with certain options set. Patch: http://patches.gluster.com/patch/2781/ Reproducing: http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=639 Regression potential: none known I was looking through the Changelog of GlusterFS 3.0.4 to find new items since GlusterFS 3.0.2 and I found a data corruption bug. I went back to the package in Lucid which is based on glusterfs_3.0.2-1.debian and I could not find evidence that this bug was fixed there. As an interim fix I did a backport of GlusterFS 3.0.4 from Maverick to Lucid https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/glusterfs3 so my systems are safe. This is the upstream Changelog message: commit c55134fc0c5ebe952de12757d5c53d463a9c21b5 Author: Anand Avati Date: Thu Feb 18 10:28:06 2010 + server_writev: add proper iobuf into iobref this typo results in corruption when write-behind is loaded on server side Signed-off-by: Anand V. Avati Signed-off-by: Anand V. Avati BUG: 639 (Data corruption with write-behind on server side) URL: http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=639 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubun
