Re: [Bug 1659922] Re: Firefox 51.0.1 does not display pages/shows blank pages.

2017-11-29 Thread Никитушкин Андрей
Hi!
I not know. I current not use Firefox. You can debug this audit problem
with Firefox with use reading messages "audit:" from standard syslog
file in /var/log/

On 30.11.2017 00:18, James Waldby wrote:
> Is there a bug # for this problem as observed in Firefox Quantum 57.0
> (64-bit) ?
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659922

Title:
  Firefox 51.0.1 does not display pages/shows blank pages.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1659922/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1659922] Re: Firefox 51.0.1 does not display pages/shows blank pages.

2017-01-31 Thread Simon Déziel
On 2017-01-31 02:51 PM, Thomas Mayer wrote:
> Ugly as it is, but mozilla could also maintain profiles for different
> feature sets, or distros, respectively.
> 
> But there's more: Different versions of FF with different requirements.
> The only right place to keep track of that is in the source repo of FF.
> Even if Mozilla does not maintain it distro specific, it would allow
> distros to keep track of necessary changes, at least. The latter
> approach could at least serve as a reference.
> 
> The current situation is at least unsatisfying: Disabling the profile
> because it's unmaintainable.

If you have the time, I would encourage you keep the profile enabled and
collect all the missing rules in a local/ profile whenever possible (not
possible for the lsb_release subprofile). If you desire, you could start
with what's in LP: #1533232 as I spend a lot of time collecting those
dbus and other rules. That's what I'd like to bring to the maintainer
when time permits.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659922

Title:
  Firefox 51.0.1 does not display pages/shows blank pages.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1659922/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1659922] Re: Firefox 51.0.1 does not display pages/shows blank pages.

2017-01-31 Thread Simon Déziel
On 2017-01-31 02:20 PM, Thomas Mayer wrote:
> Why should all the distros do that independently? There's a lot of
> redundancy which could be allocated elsewhere.

Indeed but cross-distro compatibility is profiles as not every
distro/release have the same feature set. For example, not all supported
version of Ubuntu have dbus/ptrace mitigation support. Recently, Debian
also enabled Apparmor but with a smaller feature set than the latest Ubuntu.

That said, I will try to reach out to the Ubuntu maintainer to at least
improve that. If we get somewhere maybe Debian or upstream would be next.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659922

Title:
  Firefox 51.0.1 does not display pages/shows blank pages.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1659922/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1659922] Re: Firefox 51.0.1 does not display pages/shows blank pages.

2017-01-31 Thread Simon Déziel
On 2017-01-31 01:24 PM, Thomas Mayer wrote:
> @sdeziel That was intentional: How should someone keep track of what
> your profile fixes if there's no ticket for each rule?

I see your point.

> How should a maintainer decide if that should be merged?

The problem is that nobody seems to care about Firefox's Apparmor
profile because it's disabled by default. I don't think that having many
small LPs will increase the likeliness of someone picking up the
individual changes one at the time and get them through SRU. I was
aiming for inclusion in the dev version of Ubuntu, in one batch.

> Please don't duplicate specific tickets to an unspecific ticket. That
> just confuses - at least me.

Alright, I'll stop. There is no point in arguing here since we both
pursue the same goal: have good Apparmor support for Firefox

Regards,
Simon

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659922

Title:
  Firefox 51.0.1 does not display pages/shows blank pages.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1659922/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs