On 2017-01-31 02:51 PM, Thomas Mayer wrote: > Ugly as it is, but mozilla could also maintain profiles for different > feature sets, or distros, respectively. > > But there's more: Different versions of FF with different requirements. > The only right place to keep track of that is in the source repo of FF. > Even if Mozilla does not maintain it distro specific, it would allow > distros to keep track of necessary changes, at least. The latter > approach could at least serve as a reference. > > The current situation is at least unsatisfying: Disabling the profile > because it's unmaintainable.
If you have the time, I would encourage you keep the profile enabled and collect all the missing rules in a local/ profile whenever possible (not possible for the lsb_release subprofile). If you desire, you could start with what's in LP: #1533232 as I spend a lot of time collecting those dbus and other rules. That's what I'd like to bring to the maintainer when time permits. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659922 Title: Firefox 51.0.1 does not display pages/shows blank pages. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1659922/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs