Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2010-02-09 Thread EddieArt
same here
i wonder what happened

On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Dave Conniff 
wrote:

> I just got the same thing
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in X.org xf86-video-intel: Fix Released
> Status in “compiz” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
> Status in “xserver-xorg-video-intel” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
> Status in “compiz” source package in Jaunty: Fix Released
> Status in “xserver-xorg-video-intel” source package in Jaunty: Fix Released
> Status in “compiz” source package in Karmic: Fix Released
> Status in “xserver-xorg-video-intel” source package in Karmic: Fix Released
>
> Bug description:
> [Problem]
> Starting around 4/3, when mesa was upgraded from 7.3 to 7.4, several i965
> users started noticing X freeze after several hours of use, triggered by
> application usage especially noticeable with (but not unique to) compiz
> enabled.
>
> [Impact]
> The freeze bug affects a subset of i965 based systems, most particularly
> those using compiz.  Exact numbers cannot be determined, but may be as high
> as 25-50% based on rough estimates.
>
> The problem is severe:  An unpredictable lockup of the system that requires
> a power cycle to recover from.  For some users it comes on within minutes,
> while for others it comes after a few hours of use.
>
> [How Addressed in Development Version]
> For now, the patch being proposed for Jaunty has been uploaded to Karmic.
>
> Longer term, we plan to move from EXA to UXA once the latter is stable
> enough.  It has been found that while UXA exhibits other kinds of freezes,
> we've not yet been able to reproduce this particular freeze there.
>
> [Patch for Jaunty]
> A low-risk workaround that has proven effective at eliminating freezes, or
> at least greatly reducing their frequency, is to increase the Virtual
> framebuffer size.  Some users do this locally as a matter of course to gain
> dual-head support, so this setting has received extremely widespread testing
> already.
>
> The patch for Jaunty causes the Virtual size to be set to 2048x2048 if it
> is not otherwise specified.  Users can still override this with their own
> settings, larger or smaller, as desired.
>
> A side effect of this patch is that it also mitigates bug 158415 to a
> degree, which will make projector usage somewhat easier for this hardware
> because it will enable X to recognize higher resolutions available from the
> external monitor than were available on initial boot.
>
> [Test Case]
> The best method found to reproduce the bug is:
>  a.  Enable compiz
>  b.  Set your desktop to a 6x1 workspace layout
>  c.  Run http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25683477/repro.sh
>  d.  System will freeze anywhere from 1-20 min typically
>  e.  Power-button shutdown is required to reset the system
>
> [Regression Potential]
> In general, Virtual has been widely and extensively tested, so we do not
> expect this patch to trigger regressions.
>
> The patch is coded to only take effect on i965 systems, so the scope of any
> regression that might conceivably be triggered will be limited to just that
> hardware.
>
> [Suspects]
> Omitting obviously trivial, unrelated changes, here are what changed in
> several suspect packages in the timeframe in question:
>
> * intel driver:
>  4/01:  118_drop_legacy3d.patch: Removed Legacy3D
>  4/03:  114_fix_xv_with_non_gem.patch: Dropped since it caused regression
>  4/06:  119_drm_bo_unreference_needs_null.patch: Fixes various nullptr
> derefs
>  4/08:  120_fix_vt_switch.patch: Fix nullptr deref in video playback
>
> * xserver:
>  4/08:  177_animated_cursor_change_master.patch: fixes animated cursors
>  4/06:  174_set_bg_pixmap_of_cow_to_none.patch: Sets bg pixmap of
> composite overlay window to None
>  3/30:  172_cwgetbackingpicture_nullptr_check.patch: fix race condition
> when minimzing/maximizing firefox with flash video playing.
>
> * mesa:
>  4/03:  7.4 released
>* Added MESA_GLX_FORCE_DIRECT env var for Xlib/software driver
>* GLSL version 1.20 is returnd by the GL_SHADING_LANGUAGE_VERSION query
>* glGetActiveUniform() returned wrong size for some array types
>* Fixed some error checking in glUniform()
>* Fixed a potential glTexImage('proxy target') segfault
>* Fixed bad reference counting for 1D/2D texture arrays
>* Fixed VBO + glPush/PopClientAttrib() bug #19835
>   * Assorted i965 driver bug fixes
>* Fixed a Windows compilation failure in s_triangle.c
>* Fixed a GLSL array indexing bug
>* Fixes for building on Haiku
>
> * linux:
>  4/04:  2.6.28-11.41:  Revert MCHBAR patch
>  4/02:  2.6.28-11.40:  Add MCHBAR patch
>
> * libdrm:
>  4/04:  02_libdrm_nouveau_update.patch: Only affects nouveau code
>  3/29:  libdrm-nouveau1.symbols: Probably innocuous
>
> [Workarounds]
> Various people have found one or more of the following have helped to
> reduce the freque

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-10-07 Thread EddieArt
Hi Geir,

Thanks a lot for your response, even if it doesn't fix the problem.
I really appreciate your trying to help although I have a different
distribution.  This goes to show how great a community you all have at
Ubuntu--which is more to than I can say right now about Mint.

By the way, do these various intel graphics cards problems effect all
Debian-based distributions or does it start only at Ubuntu?

Keep up the good work.
Peace,

Eddie


agom...@gmail.com


On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:08 AM, Geir Ove Myhr  wrote:

> > This bug has been around for a very long time now--it seems over a year
> > and a half (not just from April because I have seen related posts dating
> > to 2008).
>
> There are lots of different bugs that lead to the same problem -
> namely that the system freezes. This particular bug report is for the
> freezes that started occuring on April 3rd on many systems. This
> problem has been found (the driver was reading ahead too far into
> unallocated memory) and fixed. There are other bugs that can cause
> this (and new bugs may be introduced), but it is not the same bug.
>
> > Why is it so hard to remedy?
>
> Because each bug has a different fix. They're working on a workaround
> upstream that will automatically restart the GPU when it hangs, but
> since that a significant chunk of new code it takes time to implement.
>
> If you're system is experiencing freezes, file it as new bug report
> with `ubuntu-bug -p xserver-xorg-video-intel`, and also provide the
> information described at
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Troubleshooting/Freeze (Batchbuffer stuff,
> etc.)
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in X.org xf86-video-intel: Fix Released
> Status in “compiz” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
> Status in “xserver-xorg-video-intel” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
> Status in compiz in Ubuntu Jaunty: Fix Released
> Status in xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu Jaunty: Fix Released
> Status in compiz in Ubuntu Karmic: Fix Released
> Status in xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu Karmic: Fix Released
>
> Bug description:
> [Problem]
> Starting around 4/3, when mesa was upgraded from 7.3 to 7.4, several i965
> users started noticing X freeze after several hours of use, triggered by
> application usage especially noticeable with (but not unique to) compiz
> enabled.
>
> [Impact]
> The freeze bug affects a subset of i965 based systems, most particularly
> those using compiz.  Exact numbers cannot be determined, but may be as high
> as 25-50% based on rough estimates.
>
> The problem is severe:  An unpredictable lockup of the system that requires
> a power cycle to recover from.  For some users it comes on within minutes,
> while for others it comes after a few hours of use.
>
> [How Addressed in Development Version]
> For now, the patch being proposed for Jaunty has been uploaded to Karmic.
>
> Longer term, we plan to move from EXA to UXA once the latter is stable
> enough.  It has been found that while UXA exhibits other kinds of freezes,
> we've not yet been able to reproduce this particular freeze there.
>
> [Patch for Jaunty]
> A low-risk workaround that has proven effective at eliminating freezes, or
> at least greatly reducing their frequency, is to increase the Virtual
> framebuffer size.  Some users do this locally as a matter of course to gain
> dual-head support, so this setting has received extremely widespread testing
> already.
>
> The patch for Jaunty causes the Virtual size to be set to 2048x2048 if it
> is not otherwise specified.  Users can still override this with their own
> settings, larger or smaller, as desired.
>
> A side effect of this patch is that it also mitigates bug 158415 to a
> degree, which will make projector usage somewhat easier for this hardware
> because it will enable X to recognize higher resolutions available from the
> external monitor than were available on initial boot.
>
> [Test Case]
> The best method found to reproduce the bug is:
>  a.  Enable compiz
>  b.  Set your desktop to a 6x1 workspace layout
>  c.  Run http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25683477/repro.sh
>  d.  System will freeze anywhere from 1-20 min typically
>  e.  Power-button shutdown is required to reset the system
>
> [Regression Potential]
> In general, Virtual has been widely and extensively tested, so we do not
> expect this patch to trigger regressions.
>
> The patch is coded to only take effect on i965 systems, so the scope of any
> regression that might conceivably be triggered will be limited to just that
> hardware.
>
> [Suspects]
> Omitting obviously trivial, unrelated changes, here are what changed in
> several suspect packages in the timeframe in question:
>
> * intel driver:
>  4/01:  118_drop_legacy3d.patch: Removed Legacy3D
>  4/03:  114_fix_xv_with_non_gem.patch: Dropped since it caused regression
>  4/06:  119_drm_bo_unreference_nee

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-10-07 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
> This bug has been around for a very long time now--it seems over a year
> and a half (not just from April because I have seen related posts dating
> to 2008).

There are lots of different bugs that lead to the same problem -
namely that the system freezes. This particular bug report is for the
freezes that started occuring on April 3rd on many systems. This
problem has been found (the driver was reading ahead too far into
unallocated memory) and fixed. There are other bugs that can cause
this (and new bugs may be introduced), but it is not the same bug.

> Why is it so hard to remedy?

Because each bug has a different fix. They're working on a workaround
upstream that will automatically restart the GPU when it hangs, but
since that a significant chunk of new code it takes time to implement.

If you're system is experiencing freezes, file it as new bug report
with `ubuntu-bug -p xserver-xorg-video-intel`, and also provide the
information described at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Troubleshooting/Freeze (Batchbuffer stuff,
etc.)

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-07-14 Thread Martin Pitt
zwaldowski [2009-07-15  0:43 -]:
> Okay, where do I go next with this bug (not here on Launchpad; this
> issue)?  Despite it being marked "Fix Released" in both Jaunty and
> Karmic, I still get the freeze with stock and Xorg-Edgers drivers (on
> Jaunty) and on today's Daily Live CD.

If you get it with xorg-edgers and karmic daily CDs, it's a different
issue. Can you please do the steps on
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Troubleshooting/Freeze and report a new bug?

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-25 Thread jippie
Probably still early, I know, but after 34hrs I am still in a stable kde 
desktop with a load of effects enabled :o) Before it took maybe 15 to 30 
minutes to hang.
I only installed the released fixes, deleted the my manually edited 
xorg.conf and rebooted ... No tests with prereleased kernels, test 
patches other drivers ...

Hope this helps. Thanks guys!!

JP

Bug Watch Updater wrote:
> ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel
>Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
>
>

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-22 Thread Jonathan Blackhall
> What about Jaunty's Compiz?


It's not blacklisted anymore either.  I've been running a stock Jaunty
system (with nothing from proposed) and I finally got my compiz back when I
installed a bunch of updates this morning.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-22 Thread Thomas Foss
What about Jaunty's Compiz?

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Martin Pitt
wrote:

> karmic's compiz does not blacklist 965 any more either.
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in X.org xf86-video-intel: Confirmed
> Status in “compiz” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
> Status in “xserver-xorg-video-intel” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
> Status in compiz in Ubuntu Jaunty: Fix Released
> Status in xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu Jaunty: Fix Released
> Status in compiz in Ubuntu Karmic: Fix Released
> Status in xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu Karmic: Fix Released
>
> Bug description:
> [Problem]
> Starting around 4/3, when mesa was upgraded from 7.3 to 7.4, several i965
> users started noticing X freeze after several hours of use, triggered by
> application usage especially noticeable with (but not unique to) compiz
> enabled.
>
> [Impact]
> The freeze bug affects a subset of i965 based systems, most particularly
> those using compiz.  Exact numbers cannot be determined, but may be as high
> as 25-50% based on rough estimates.
>
> The problem is severe:  An unpredictable lockup of the system that requires
> a power cycle to recover from.  For some users it comes on within minutes,
> while for others it comes after a few hours of use.
>
> [How Addressed in Development Version]
> For now, the patch being proposed for Jaunty has been uploaded to Karmic.
>
> Longer term, we plan to move from EXA to UXA once the latter is stable
> enough.  It has been found that while UXA exhibits other kinds of freezes,
> we've not yet been able to reproduce this particular freeze there.
>
> [Patch for Jaunty]
> A low-risk workaround that has proven effective at eliminating freezes, or
> at least greatly reducing their frequency, is to increase the Virtual
> framebuffer size.  Some users do this locally as a matter of course to gain
> dual-head support, so this setting has received extremely widespread testing
> already.
>
> The patch for Jaunty causes the Virtual size to be set to 2048x2048 if it
> is not otherwise specified.  Users can still override this with their own
> settings, larger or smaller, as desired.
>
> A side effect of this patch is that it also mitigates bug 158415 to a
> degree, which will make projector usage somewhat easier for this hardware
> because it will enable X to recognize higher resolutions available from the
> external monitor than were available on initial boot.
>
> [Test Case]
> The best method found to reproduce the bug is:
>  a.  Enable compiz
>  b.  Set your desktop to a 6x1 workspace layout
>  c.  Run http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25683477/repro.sh
>  d.  System will freeze anywhere from 1-20 min typically
>  e.  Power-button shutdown is required to reset the system
>
> [Regression Potential]
> In general, Virtual has been widely and extensively tested, so we do not
> expect this patch to trigger regressions.
>
> The patch is coded to only take effect on i965 systems, so the scope of any
> regression that might conceivably be triggered will be limited to just that
> hardware.
>
> [Suspects]
> Omitting obviously trivial, unrelated changes, here are what changed in
> several suspect packages in the timeframe in question:
>
> * intel driver:
>  4/01:  118_drop_legacy3d.patch: Removed Legacy3D
>  4/03:  114_fix_xv_with_non_gem.patch: Dropped since it caused regression
>  4/06:  119_drm_bo_unreference_needs_null.patch: Fixes various nullptr
> derefs
>  4/08:  120_fix_vt_switch.patch: Fix nullptr deref in video playback
>
> * xserver:
>  4/08:  177_animated_cursor_change_master.patch: fixes animated cursors
>  4/06:  174_set_bg_pixmap_of_cow_to_none.patch: Sets bg pixmap of
> composite overlay window to None
>  3/30:  172_cwgetbackingpicture_nullptr_check.patch: fix race condition
> when minimzing/maximizing firefox with flash video playing.
>
> * mesa:
>  4/03:  7.4 released
>* Added MESA_GLX_FORCE_DIRECT env var for Xlib/software driver
>* GLSL version 1.20 is returnd by the GL_SHADING_LANGUAGE_VERSION query
>* glGetActiveUniform() returned wrong size for some array types
>* Fixed some error checking in glUniform()
>* Fixed a potential glTexImage('proxy target') segfault
>* Fixed bad reference counting for 1D/2D texture arrays
>* Fixed VBO + glPush/PopClientAttrib() bug #19835
>   * Assorted i965 driver bug fixes
>* Fixed a Windows compilation failure in s_triangle.c
>* Fixed a GLSL array indexing bug
>* Fixes for building on Haiku
>
> * linux:
>  4/04:  2.6.28-11.41:  Revert MCHBAR patch
>  4/02:  2.6.28-11.40:  Add MCHBAR patch
>
> * libdrm:
>  4/04:  02_libdrm_nouveau_update.patch: Only affects nouveau code
>  3/29:  libdrm-nouveau1.symbols: Probably innocuous
>
> [Workarounds]
> Various people have found one or more of the following have helped to
> reduce the frequency 

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-22 Thread Mario
reini wrote:
> Am Montag 22 Juni 2009 schrieb Martin Pitt:
>> Is there anyone who could give some feedback about a Jaunty
>> standard configuration/kernel with the jaunty-proposed -intel
>> driver?
> 
> Sure can. No freezes since I installed it, and I installed it as soon 
> as it hit the proposed repos +- a couple of hours.

With driver in ubuntu-proposed I have had no more freeze (the kind with
the only the mouse pointer working) but I had other kind of freeze. I've
upgraded the kernel to 2.6.30 and I don't have freezes since one week.

My solution: kernel 2.6.30 + intel drivers in jaunty-proposed.

Mario

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-21 Thread Martin Pitt
Is there anyone who could give some feedback about a Jaunty standard
configuration/kernel with the jaunty-proposed -intel driver? We need
to get some verification to get this into jaunty-updates.

I would kindly ask people to stop reporting problems with 2.6.30/UXA
here. The bug trail is long enough as it is, and problems with
2.6.30/UXA belong in separate bug reports. Thank you!

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-21 Thread LanoxxthShaddow
I just wanted to give an update about my configuration sofar:

Uptime:
 18:58:44 up 8 days, 17:09,  5 users,  load average: 0.45, 0.59, 0.71


With Kernel 2.6.30 from the kernel-ppa/mainline and intel driver 2.7.1
from x-update I have been running stable and without any issues. I have
reactived normal compiz compositing by removing compiz from the
blacklisting and activating it in the apperance menu. Also
suspend/resume works well, even a little quicker than before and with
less errors on resume.

Regards
Lanoxx

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-21 Thread Jithin Emmanuel
Oded For me the lock up in instantaneously. So we might be having different
issues. I am using packages from xorg-edgers PPA.
And for me also there is no messages in syslog its only in Xorg log

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Oded Arbel  wrote:

> I got the same freeze again (with laptop screen closed) but without the
> syslog messages, so its probably not related.
>
> My problem is not an immediate lockup like it seems that Jithin Emmanuel
> reported (though I haven't looked at the Xorg log yet) - if I just close
> the lid and leave it for a few minutes and open it again then its
> usually still ok. For me the freeze happens when I have the screen
> closed for a long time - several hours.
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Thanks
Jithin Emmanuel

Henny Youngman
- "I told the doctor I broke my leg in two places. He told me to quit
going
to those places."

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-14 Thread Jithin Emmanuel
On Monday 15 Jun 2009 2:17:54 am Mike.lifeguard wrote:
> If you're no longer experiencing freezes, and you're using xorg-edgers
> stuff, please let us know /specifically/ which version of xserver-xorg-
> video-intel you're running.
I am using
xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.7.99.901+git20090611.6d062e9e-0ubuntu0sarvatt~jaunty

libdrm2 - 2.4.11+git20090519.f355ad89-0ubuntu0sarvatt~jaunty

xserver-xorg-core
2:1.6.1.901+git20090523+server-1.6-branch.5cd5a012-0ubuntu0sarvatt2

and kernel 2..6.30
-- 
Thanks
Jithin Emmanuel

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-14 Thread LanoxxthShaddow
I have been running with a kernel from the kernel-ppa 2.6.30
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.30/
and the intel driver 2.7.1 from X updates
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-updates
and compiz reenabled for three days now without a freeze.
I am on amd64.

Best Regards
Lanoxx

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-14 Thread Jean-François Fortin Tam

> If you're no longer experiencing freezes, and you're using xorg-edgers
> stuff, please let us know /specifically/ which version of
> xserver-xorg-
> video-intel you're running.


Not sure if I need to reply directly to this thread about this, but here
goes: I am using xserver-xorg-video-intel 2.7.99.901
+git20090611.6d062e9e-0ubuntu0sarvatt~jaunty

You may have noticed that this is not the latest version. The reason is
simple: I just pinned/locked my packages to prevent upgrading, fearing
that things would break (I did not have a single problem with this
driver and the version before, been using that for a few weeks or so
since I switched to jaunty).

Thus, since I'm not running the latest one, I somewhat doubt my
testimonial will be relevant, but here goes, in the hope it is useful. I
am using a Dellbuntu Inspiron 530n, which has this 3100 gpu:

00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31 Express
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02), Dell Device 020d

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-14 Thread Jithin Emmanuel
I think the situation is improving and hope that by the time intel 2.8
driver is released everything is fixed. Except for these minor issues
I am almost happy with the current situation.

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 07:05 +, Jithin Emmanuel wrote:
>> On Thursday 11 Jun 2009 4:43:06 am zwaldowski wrote:
>> > Well, hot damn!  Let me get that installed right now...
>> >
>> > Jithin, before you do anything drastic, I just found out the hard way
>> > that Fedora IS NOT FIXED.  And they don't even have Magic SysRq's
>> > enabled!  Good thing I wasn't in the middle of installing it...
>> kernel 2.6.30 + packages from xorg-edgers is working for me. So far no freeze
>> and everything is pretty stable. Suspend and hibernation is also working,
>> though desktop effects are getting disabled after that.
>
> Not here, almost always hang on resume from suspend and still random
> (but rare) lockups with mouse still active.
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Thanks
Jithin Emmanuel

W. C. Fields  - "If I had to live my life over, I'd live over a
saloon." - http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/w/w_c_fields.html

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-14 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 07:05 +, Jithin Emmanuel wrote:
> On Thursday 11 Jun 2009 4:43:06 am zwaldowski wrote:
> > Well, hot damn!  Let me get that installed right now...
> >
> > Jithin, before you do anything drastic, I just found out the hard way
> > that Fedora IS NOT FIXED.  And they don't even have Magic SysRq's
> > enabled!  Good thing I wasn't in the middle of installing it...
> kernel 2.6.30 + packages from xorg-edgers is working for me. So far no freeze 
> and everything is pretty stable. Suspend and hibernation is also working, 
> though desktop effects are getting disabled after that.

Not here, almost always hang on resume from suspend and still random
(but rare) lockups with mouse still active.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Bernhard,

Bernhard [2009-06-07 19:27 -]:
> Thanks a lot Martin, does this new proposed package include Bryce's
> recent patch to bug 314928 as well?

No, not yet. Let's test that separately.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-11 Thread Jithin Emmanuel
On Thursday 11 Jun 2009 4:43:06 am zwaldowski wrote:
> Well, hot damn!  Let me get that installed right now...
>
> Jithin, before you do anything drastic, I just found out the hard way
> that Fedora IS NOT FIXED.  And they don't even have Magic SysRq's
> enabled!  Good thing I wasn't in the middle of installing it...
kernel 2.6.30 + packages from xorg-edgers is working for me. So far no freeze 
and everything is pretty stable. Suspend and hibernation is also working, 
though desktop effects are getting disabled after that.
-- 
Thanks
Jithin Emmanuel

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-10 Thread Jithin Emmanuel
Thanks zwaldowski I was planing to install it today. So every one has
the problem. Too bad fedora had it from f 10 onwards.
I am planning to give kernel 30 and xorg-edgers ppa a try. People
please continue posting their experience here so that we can lock on a
working combination for all.

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:43 AM, zwaldowski wrote:
> Well, hot damn!  Let me get that installed right now...
>
> Jithin, before you do anything drastic, I just found out the hard way
> that Fedora IS NOT FIXED.  And they don't even have Magic SysRq's
> enabled!  Good thing I wasn't in the middle of installing it...
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Regards
Jithin Emmanuel

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-10 Thread reini
Am Mittwoch 10 Juni 2009 schrieb zwaldowski:
> Reini, are you sure?  I use the main US servers and still have
> whatever version uses the VirtualSize fix (I can't recall the
> version number off the top of my head, I'm in the hated OS right
> now)

Yes, I'm surprisingly sure, considering I had to manually allow 
aptitude to upgrade that package as I had locked the previous 
version. Also, the version 9.2 packages aren't available anymore.

also:

re...@localhost> dpkg -l |grep xserver-xorg-video-intel
ii  xserver-xorg-video-intel   2:2.6.3-0ubuntu9.3

I'm using the german mirrors & the archive.ubuntu.com ones.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-09 Thread Jithin Emmanuel
@zwaldowski Are you sure fedora 11 fixes this completely. Do they use
UXA?

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:56 AM, zwaldowski wrote:
> While we're waiting for the new fix to hit the proposed repo, or if it
> doesn't work for you from the green PPA, I'm able to report that the
> latest packages from xorg-edgers totally and completely fix the freezes.
> If you're beyond desperate, the new Fedora 11 does as well.
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Regards
Jithin Emmanuel

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-07 Thread Bernhard
Thanks a lot Martin, does this new proposed package include Bryce's
recent patch to bug 314928 as well?

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Accepted xserver-xorg-video-intel into jaunty-proposed, the package will
> build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback
> here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for
> documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
>
> ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu Jaunty)
>       Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd --- please test new package

2009-06-07 Thread BUGabundo
Olá Tom e a todos.

On Sunday 07 June 2009 00:21:07 Tom Jaeger wrote:
> This is going to happen if you "unredirect" fullscreen windows (System
> -> Preferences -> CompizConfig Settings Manager -> General Options ->
> General -> Unredirect Fullscreen Windows).

Thanks. that fixed my prob with apps in fullscreen flashing evertime a
NotifyOSD came up.

-- 
Hi, I'm BUGabundo, and I am Ubuntu (whyubuntu.com)
(``-_-´´)   http://LinuxNoDEI.BUGabundo.net && Ubuntu LoCoTeam Portugal 
http://ubuntu-pt.org
Linux user #443786GPG key 1024D/A1784EBB

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-07 Thread Bernhard
The glxgears seem to have no significance at all, I usually had a more
responsive Desktop when the glxgears performance was "worse".

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 12:04 PM, David Nemeskey wrote:
> Installed the "green" driver yesterday, and had not freezes since then.
> However, the performance is abyssmal. glxgears reports 1000 fps, 700 w/
> Compiz, kwin seems to be able to get the maximum, though. X.org
> sometimes uses as much as 70% of the cpu, and the system definitely
> feels like it: video lagging, mouse cursor jumping in SDL applications,
> etc. I know that the i965 is not the best for playing Crysis, but it
> should be able to handle videos and basic compositioning.
>
> Also, as reported before, the KDE 4 screen corruption issue is there.
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd --- please test new package

2009-06-07 Thread Joachim Nilsson
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 11:21:07PM -, Tom Jaeger wrote:
> Thomas Foss wrote:
> > When in full-screen mode in Firefox (F11), the entire screen "blinks"
> > whenever the little alt-text window (or whatever it's called) pops up. It's
> > very annoying. I think it's more of a Compiz problem than a graphics problem
> > in general... but it didn't do this before. Perhaps a fresh install of
> > Compiz will settle it down...
> This is going to happen if you "unredirect" fullscreen windows (System
> -> Preferences -> CompizConfig Settings Manager -> General Options ->
> General -> Unredirect Fullscreen Windows).

Wow, thanks!  I'd also been looking for the root cause of this problem
for quite some time! :-)

Regards
 /Jocke

--  
Joachim Nilsson :: http://member.fsf.org/join/
FSF Member #654 :: Join the Free Software Foundation!

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd --- please test new package

2009-06-07 Thread Oded Arbel
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 12:15 +, Martin Pitt wrote:
> many thanks to Albert Damen for his comprehensive analysis. The cited
> kernel patches are only for UXA and don't backport well, so we won't
> backport them to Jaunty (at least not now). However, his aperture
> patch already got good feedback and seems to fix the problem in a much
> better way than the previous VirtualSize workaround which is currently
> sitting in -proposed.
> 
> Can people who are affected by this and who run a standard
> configuration (i. e. NO UXA, NO KMS, NO 2.6.30 kernel, etc.) please
> enable this PPA and test the updated -intel driver there?
> 
>   https://launchpad.net/~bryceharrington/+archive/green
> 
> Please report positive and negative feedback about this package here.
> (Please no further feedback about "I also have this problem", or
> problems with UXA).

After a couple of freezes with the x-swat's team drivers, I've reset
everything to current jaunty and installed the above drivers. Currently
I'm back in compiz and no freeze for the last day, and performance isn't
bad either (nothing earth shuttering, but glxgears at 850FPS is a bit
better then what I'm used to from Intel GMA).

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd --- please test new package

2009-06-06 Thread Thomas Foss
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Tom Jaeger  wrote:

> This is going to happen if you "unredirect" fullscreen windows (System
> -> Preferences -> CompizConfig Settings Manager -> General Options ->
> General -> Unredirect Fullscreen Windows).


That fixed it... although I don't understand what it did, or why it never
did that before. :P Now if I could just get my window borders back...


>
> Thomas Foss wrote:
> > When in full-screen mode in Firefox (F11), the entire screen "blinks"
> > whenever the little alt-text window (or whatever it's called) pops up.
> It's
> > very annoying. I think it's more of a Compiz problem than a graphics
> problem
> > in general... but it didn't do this before. Perhaps a fresh install of
> > Compiz will settle it down...
> >
> > --Thomas
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in X.org xf86-video-intel: Confirmed
> Status in “compiz” source package in Ubuntu: In Progress
> Status in “xserver-xorg-video-intel” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
> Status in compiz in Ubuntu Jaunty: Fix Committed
> Status in xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu Jaunty: Confirmed
> Status in compiz in Ubuntu Karmic: In Progress
> Status in xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu Karmic: Fix Released
>
> Bug description:
> [Problem]
> Starting around 4/3, when mesa was upgraded from 7.3 to 7.4, several i965
> users started noticing X freeze after several hours of use, triggered by
> application usage especially noticeable with (but not unique to) compiz
> enabled.
>
> [Impact]
> The freeze bug affects a subset of i965 based systems, most particularly
> those using compiz.  Exact numbers cannot be determined, but may be as high
> as 25-50% based on rough estimates.
>
> The problem is severe:  An unpredictable lockup of the system that requires
> a power cycle to recover from.  For some users it comes on within minutes,
> while for others it comes after a few hours of use.
>
> [How Addressed in Development Version]
> For now, the patch being proposed for Jaunty has been uploaded to Karmic.
>
> Longer term, we plan to move from EXA to UXA once the latter is stable
> enough.  It has been found that while UXA exhibits other kinds of freezes,
> we've not yet been able to reproduce this particular freeze there.
>
> [Patch for Jaunty]
> A low-risk workaround that has proven effective at eliminating freezes, or
> at least greatly reducing their frequency, is to increase the Virtual
> framebuffer size.  Some users do this locally as a matter of course to gain
> dual-head support, so this setting has received extremely widespread testing
> already.
>
> The patch for Jaunty causes the Virtual size to be set to 2048x2048 if it
> is not otherwise specified.  Users can still override this with their own
> settings, larger or smaller, as desired.
>
> A side effect of this patch is that it also mitigates bug 158415 to a
> degree, which will make projector usage somewhat easier for this hardware
> because it will enable X to recognize higher resolutions available from the
> external monitor than were available on initial boot.
>
> [Test Case]
> The best method found to reproduce the bug is:
>  a.  Enable compiz
>  b.  Set your desktop to a 6x1 workspace layout
>  c.  Run http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25683477/repro.sh
>  d.  System will freeze anywhere from 1-20 min typically
>  e.  Power-button shutdown is required to reset the system
>
> [Regression Potential]
> In general, Virtual has been widely and extensively tested, so we do not
> expect this patch to trigger regressions.
>
> The patch is coded to only take effect on i965 systems, so the scope of any
> regression that might conceivably be triggered will be limited to just that
> hardware.
>
> [Suspects]
> Omitting obviously trivial, unrelated changes, here are what changed in
> several suspect packages in the timeframe in question:
>
> * intel driver:
>  4/01:  118_drop_legacy3d.patch: Removed Legacy3D
>  4/03:  114_fix_xv_with_non_gem.patch: Dropped since it caused regression
>  4/06:  119_drm_bo_unreference_needs_null.patch: Fixes various nullptr
> derefs
>  4/08:  120_fix_vt_switch.patch: Fix nullptr deref in video playback
>
> * xserver:
>  4/08:  177_animated_cursor_change_master.patch: fixes animated cursors
>  4/06:  174_set_bg_pixmap_of_cow_to_none.patch: Sets bg pixmap of
> composite overlay window to None
>  3/30:  172_cwgetbackingpicture_nullptr_check.patch: fix race condition
> when minimzing/maximizing firefox with flash video playing.
>
> * mesa:
>  4/03:  7.4 released
>* Added MESA_GLX_FORCE_DIRECT env var for Xlib/software driver
>* GLSL version 1.20 is returnd by the GL_SHADING_LANGUAGE_VERSION query
>* glGetActiveUniform() returned wrong size for some array types
>* Fixed some error checking in glUniform()
>* Fixed a potential glTexImage('proxy target') segfault
> 

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd--- please test newpackage

2009-06-06 Thread reini
I haven't had this kind of freeze in several hours now. I have, 
however, experienced another freeze where the screen just froze and 
nothing reacted anymore (no mouse movement, nothing).

I believe this to be a different bug and will report it separately as 
soon as I get around to it.

For now, this should count as positive feedback for the patch in the 
green repository.

Am Samstag 06 Juni 2009 schrieb Martin Pitt:
> Hello all,
>
> many thanks to Albert Damen for his comprehensive analysis. The
> cited kernel patches are only for UXA and don't backport well, so
> we won't backport them to Jaunty (at least not now). However, his
> aperture patch already got good feedback and seems to fix the
> problem in a much better way than the previous VirtualSize
> workaround which is currently sitting in -proposed.
>
> Can people who are affected by this and who run a standard
> configuration (i. e. NO UXA, NO KMS, NO 2.6.30 kernel, etc.)
> please enable this PPA and test the updated -intel driver there?
>
>   https://launchpad.net/~bryceharrington/+archive/green
>
> Please report positive and negative feedback about this package
> here. (Please no further feedback about "I also have this
> problem", or problems with UXA).

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd --- please test new package

2009-06-06 Thread Jithin Emmanuel
I downgraded all my packages from xswat and xorg edgers to ones from
jaunty and installed this package.
One thing to notice is that its affected performance considerably
things are a lot slower and kde 4.2 is pretty mch useless without UXA
because of screen corrupting problem( Well I dont think any one is
going to care about this part).

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:51 AM, Tom Jaeger wrote:
> This is going to happen if you "unredirect" fullscreen windows (System
> -> Preferences -> CompizConfig Settings Manager -> General Options ->
> General -> Unredirect Fullscreen Windows).
>
> Thomas Foss wrote:
>> When in full-screen mode in Firefox (F11), the entire screen "blinks"
>> whenever the little alt-text window (or whatever it's called) pops up. It's
>> very annoying. I think it's more of a Compiz problem than a graphics problem
>> in general... but it didn't do this before. Perhaps a fresh install of
>> Compiz will settle it down...
>>
>> --Thomas
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Regards
Jithin Emmanuel

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd --- please test new package

2009-06-06 Thread Tom Jaeger
This is going to happen if you "unredirect" fullscreen windows (System
-> Preferences -> CompizConfig Settings Manager -> General Options ->
General -> Unredirect Fullscreen Windows).

Thomas Foss wrote:
> When in full-screen mode in Firefox (F11), the entire screen "blinks"
> whenever the little alt-text window (or whatever it's called) pops up. It's
> very annoying. I think it's more of a Compiz problem than a graphics problem
> in general... but it didn't do this before. Perhaps a fresh install of
> Compiz will settle it down...
> 
> --Thomas

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd --- please test new package

2009-06-06 Thread Thomas Foss
When in full-screen mode in Firefox (F11), the entire screen "blinks"
whenever the little alt-text window (or whatever it's called) pops up. It's
very annoying. I think it's more of a Compiz problem than a graphics problem
in general... but it didn't do this before. Perhaps a fresh install of
Compiz will settle it down...

--Thomas

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Thomas  wrote:

> Graphics are really smooth. Window borders have gone all wonky... not
> glitching, just... different. And I can't seem to change them back.
> http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/455435/LiveJournal//Metacity.png
> http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/455435/LiveJournal/Compiz.png
> (The "Metacity" screenshot is what the window borders used to look like all
> the time, and still look like in Metacity.)
>
> I also can't seem to grab the cube with the middle mouse button anymore...
> Somehow I remember being able to rotate the cube with Ctrl+Alt+Button1 or
> also with the middle mouse button... but I only see one "initiate" shortcut
> setting, so I don't know how to get it back to doing both. Hmm.
>
> Overall though I think these are small problems for which I just need to
> find the right settings. I haven't seen any problems with the graphics so
> far. Are there any specific tests I should do to try to provoke it?
>
> --Thomas
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Thomas  wrote:
>
>> Alright, I'll give it a shot.
>>
>> --Thomas
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
>>
>>> Thomas Foss [2009-06-06 13:18 -]:
>>> > Quick question... does these freezes only happen when Compiz is
>>> enabled? I
>>> > think I have this bug (because I've got a 965GM chipset and Compiz is
>>> > disabled), but I've never had any freezes. Should I be re-enabling
>>> Compiz to
>>> > see if this patch fixes the problem, or will it remove the Compiz
>>> blacklist
>>> > automatically?
>>>
>>> It mostly occurs with compiz. You might also be able to reproduce it
>>> with other 3D applications, though.
>>>
>>> Please note that the compiz package in jaunty-proposed removed the
>>> blacklisting of 965, so you should test both together.
>>>
>>> --
>>> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
>>> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
>>> of the bug.
>>>
>>> Status in X.org xf86-video-intel: Confirmed
>>> Status in “compiz” source package in Ubuntu: In Progress
>>> Status in “xserver-xorg-video-intel” source package in Ubuntu: Fix
>>> Released
>>> Status in compiz in Ubuntu Jaunty: Fix Committed
>>> Status in xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu Jaunty: Confirmed
>>> Status in compiz in Ubuntu Karmic: In Progress
>>> Status in xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu Karmic: Fix Released
>>>
>>> Bug description:
>>> [Problem]
>>> Starting around 4/3, when mesa was upgraded from 7.3 to 7.4, several i965
>>> users started noticing X freeze after several hours of use, triggered by
>>> application usage especially noticeable with (but not unique to) compiz
>>> enabled.
>>>
>>> [Impact]
>>> The freeze bug affects a subset of i965 based systems, most particularly
>>> those using compiz.  Exact numbers cannot be determined, but may be as high
>>> as 25-50% based on rough estimates.
>>>
>>> The problem is severe:  An unpredictable lockup of the system that
>>> requires a power cycle to recover from.  For some users it comes on within
>>> minutes, while for others it comes after a few hours of use.
>>>
>>> [How Addressed in Development Version]
>>> For now, the patch being proposed for Jaunty has been uploaded to Karmic.
>>>
>>> Longer term, we plan to move from EXA to UXA once the latter is stable
>>> enough.  It has been found that while UXA exhibits other kinds of freezes,
>>> we've not yet been able to reproduce this particular freeze there.
>>>
>>> [Patch for Jaunty]
>>> A low-risk workaround that has proven effective at eliminating freezes,
>>> or at least greatly reducing their frequency, is to increase the Virtual
>>> framebuffer size.  Some users do this locally as a matter of course to gain
>>> dual-head support, so this setting has received extremely widespread testing
>>> already.
>>>
>>> The patch for Jaunty causes the Virtual size to be set to 2048x2048 if it
>>> is not otherwise specified.  Users can still override this with their own
>>> settings, larger or smaller, as desired.
>>>
>>> A side effect of this patch is that it also mitigates bug 158415 to a
>>> degree, which will make projector usage somewhat easier for this hardware
>>> because it will enable X to recognize higher resolutions available from the
>>> external monitor than were available on initial boot.
>>>
>>> [Test Case]
>>> The best method found to reproduce the bug is:
>>>  a.  Enable compiz
>>>  b.  Set your desktop to a 6x1 workspace layout
>>>  c.  Run http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25683477/repro.sh
>>>  d.  System will freeze anywhere from 1-20 min typically
>>>  e.  Power-button shutdown is required to reset the system

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd --- please test new package

2009-06-06 Thread Thomas Foss
Graphics are really smooth. Window borders have gone all wonky... not
glitching, just... different. And I can't seem to change them back.
http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/455435/LiveJournal//Metacity.png
http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/455435/LiveJournal/Compiz.png
(The "Metacity" screenshot is what the window borders used to look like all
the time, and still look like in Metacity.)

I also can't seem to grab the cube with the middle mouse button anymore...
Somehow I remember being able to rotate the cube with Ctrl+Alt+Button1 or
also with the middle mouse button... but I only see one "initiate" shortcut
setting, so I don't know how to get it back to doing both. Hmm.

Overall though I think these are small problems for which I just need to
find the right settings. I haven't seen any problems with the graphics so
far. Are there any specific tests I should do to try to provoke it?

--Thomas

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Thomas  wrote:

> Alright, I'll give it a shot.
>
> --Thomas
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
>
>> Thomas Foss [2009-06-06 13:18 -]:
>> > Quick question... does these freezes only happen when Compiz is enabled?
>> I
>> > think I have this bug (because I've got a 965GM chipset and Compiz is
>> > disabled), but I've never had any freezes. Should I be re-enabling
>> Compiz to
>> > see if this patch fixes the problem, or will it remove the Compiz
>> blacklist
>> > automatically?
>>
>> It mostly occurs with compiz. You might also be able to reproduce it
>> with other 3D applications, though.
>>
>> Please note that the compiz package in jaunty-proposed removed the
>> blacklisting of 965, so you should test both together.
>>
>> --
>> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
>> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
>> of the bug.
>>
>> Status in X.org xf86-video-intel: Confirmed
>> Status in “compiz” source package in Ubuntu: In Progress
>> Status in “xserver-xorg-video-intel” source package in Ubuntu: Fix
>> Released
>> Status in compiz in Ubuntu Jaunty: Fix Committed
>> Status in xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu Jaunty: Confirmed
>> Status in compiz in Ubuntu Karmic: In Progress
>> Status in xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu Karmic: Fix Released
>>
>> Bug description:
>> [Problem]
>> Starting around 4/3, when mesa was upgraded from 7.3 to 7.4, several i965
>> users started noticing X freeze after several hours of use, triggered by
>> application usage especially noticeable with (but not unique to) compiz
>> enabled.
>>
>> [Impact]
>> The freeze bug affects a subset of i965 based systems, most particularly
>> those using compiz.  Exact numbers cannot be determined, but may be as high
>> as 25-50% based on rough estimates.
>>
>> The problem is severe:  An unpredictable lockup of the system that
>> requires a power cycle to recover from.  For some users it comes on within
>> minutes, while for others it comes after a few hours of use.
>>
>> [How Addressed in Development Version]
>> For now, the patch being proposed for Jaunty has been uploaded to Karmic.
>>
>> Longer term, we plan to move from EXA to UXA once the latter is stable
>> enough.  It has been found that while UXA exhibits other kinds of freezes,
>> we've not yet been able to reproduce this particular freeze there.
>>
>> [Patch for Jaunty]
>> A low-risk workaround that has proven effective at eliminating freezes, or
>> at least greatly reducing their frequency, is to increase the Virtual
>> framebuffer size.  Some users do this locally as a matter of course to gain
>> dual-head support, so this setting has received extremely widespread testing
>> already.
>>
>> The patch for Jaunty causes the Virtual size to be set to 2048x2048 if it
>> is not otherwise specified.  Users can still override this with their own
>> settings, larger or smaller, as desired.
>>
>> A side effect of this patch is that it also mitigates bug 158415 to a
>> degree, which will make projector usage somewhat easier for this hardware
>> because it will enable X to recognize higher resolutions available from the
>> external monitor than were available on initial boot.
>>
>> [Test Case]
>> The best method found to reproduce the bug is:
>>  a.  Enable compiz
>>  b.  Set your desktop to a 6x1 workspace layout
>>  c.  Run http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25683477/repro.sh
>>  d.  System will freeze anywhere from 1-20 min typically
>>  e.  Power-button shutdown is required to reset the system
>>
>> [Regression Potential]
>> In general, Virtual has been widely and extensively tested, so we do not
>> expect this patch to trigger regressions.
>>
>> The patch is coded to only take effect on i965 systems, so the scope of
>> any regression that might conceivably be triggered will be limited to just
>> that hardware.
>>
>> [Suspects]
>> Omitting obviously trivial, unrelated changes, here are what changed in
>> several suspect packages in the timeframe in question:
>>
>> * intel driver:
>>  4/01

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd --- please test new package

2009-06-06 Thread Thomas Foss
Alright, I'll give it a shot.

--Thomas

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Martin Pitt 
wrote:

> Thomas Foss [2009-06-06 13:18 -]:
> > Quick question... does these freezes only happen when Compiz is enabled?
> I
> > think I have this bug (because I've got a 965GM chipset and Compiz is
> > disabled), but I've never had any freezes. Should I be re-enabling Compiz
> to
> > see if this patch fixes the problem, or will it remove the Compiz
> blacklist
> > automatically?
>
> It mostly occurs with compiz. You might also be able to reproduce it
> with other 3D applications, though.
>
> Please note that the compiz package in jaunty-proposed removed the
> blacklisting of 965, so you should test both together.
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in X.org xf86-video-intel: Confirmed
> Status in “compiz” source package in Ubuntu: In Progress
> Status in “xserver-xorg-video-intel” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
> Status in compiz in Ubuntu Jaunty: Fix Committed
> Status in xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu Jaunty: Confirmed
> Status in compiz in Ubuntu Karmic: In Progress
> Status in xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu Karmic: Fix Released
>
> Bug description:
> [Problem]
> Starting around 4/3, when mesa was upgraded from 7.3 to 7.4, several i965
> users started noticing X freeze after several hours of use, triggered by
> application usage especially noticeable with (but not unique to) compiz
> enabled.
>
> [Impact]
> The freeze bug affects a subset of i965 based systems, most particularly
> those using compiz.  Exact numbers cannot be determined, but may be as high
> as 25-50% based on rough estimates.
>
> The problem is severe:  An unpredictable lockup of the system that requires
> a power cycle to recover from.  For some users it comes on within minutes,
> while for others it comes after a few hours of use.
>
> [How Addressed in Development Version]
> For now, the patch being proposed for Jaunty has been uploaded to Karmic.
>
> Longer term, we plan to move from EXA to UXA once the latter is stable
> enough.  It has been found that while UXA exhibits other kinds of freezes,
> we've not yet been able to reproduce this particular freeze there.
>
> [Patch for Jaunty]
> A low-risk workaround that has proven effective at eliminating freezes, or
> at least greatly reducing their frequency, is to increase the Virtual
> framebuffer size.  Some users do this locally as a matter of course to gain
> dual-head support, so this setting has received extremely widespread testing
> already.
>
> The patch for Jaunty causes the Virtual size to be set to 2048x2048 if it
> is not otherwise specified.  Users can still override this with their own
> settings, larger or smaller, as desired.
>
> A side effect of this patch is that it also mitigates bug 158415 to a
> degree, which will make projector usage somewhat easier for this hardware
> because it will enable X to recognize higher resolutions available from the
> external monitor than were available on initial boot.
>
> [Test Case]
> The best method found to reproduce the bug is:
>  a.  Enable compiz
>  b.  Set your desktop to a 6x1 workspace layout
>  c.  Run http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25683477/repro.sh
>  d.  System will freeze anywhere from 1-20 min typically
>  e.  Power-button shutdown is required to reset the system
>
> [Regression Potential]
> In general, Virtual has been widely and extensively tested, so we do not
> expect this patch to trigger regressions.
>
> The patch is coded to only take effect on i965 systems, so the scope of any
> regression that might conceivably be triggered will be limited to just that
> hardware.
>
> [Suspects]
> Omitting obviously trivial, unrelated changes, here are what changed in
> several suspect packages in the timeframe in question:
>
> * intel driver:
>  4/01:  118_drop_legacy3d.patch: Removed Legacy3D
>  4/03:  114_fix_xv_with_non_gem.patch: Dropped since it caused regression
>  4/06:  119_drm_bo_unreference_needs_null.patch: Fixes various nullptr
> derefs
>  4/08:  120_fix_vt_switch.patch: Fix nullptr deref in video playback
>
> * xserver:
>  4/08:  177_animated_cursor_change_master.patch: fixes animated cursors
>  4/06:  174_set_bg_pixmap_of_cow_to_none.patch: Sets bg pixmap of
> composite overlay window to None
>  3/30:  172_cwgetbackingpicture_nullptr_check.patch: fix race condition
> when minimzing/maximizing firefox with flash video playing.
>
> * mesa:
>  4/03:  7.4 released
>* Added MESA_GLX_FORCE_DIRECT env var for Xlib/software driver
>* GLSL version 1.20 is returnd by the GL_SHADING_LANGUAGE_VERSION query
>* glGetActiveUniform() returned wrong size for some array types
>* Fixed some error checking in glUniform()
>* Fixed a potential glTexImage('proxy target') segfault
>* Fixed bad reference counting for 1D/2D texture arrays
>* 

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd --- please test new package

2009-06-06 Thread Martin Pitt
Thomas Foss [2009-06-06 13:18 -]:
> Quick question... does these freezes only happen when Compiz is enabled? I
> think I have this bug (because I've got a 965GM chipset and Compiz is
> disabled), but I've never had any freezes. Should I be re-enabling Compiz to
> see if this patch fixes the problem, or will it remove the Compiz blacklist
> automatically?

It mostly occurs with compiz. You might also be able to reproduce it
with other 3D applications, though.

Please note that the compiz package in jaunty-proposed removed the
blacklisting of 965, so you should test both together.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd--- please test newpackage

2009-06-06 Thread Bernhard
Yes, please. It's just an annoyance but I have the same issue as reini.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd --- please test new package

2009-06-06 Thread Bernhard
@Thomas Foss: I never had any freezes myself, even with compiz. But I
had enourmous problems with my video card when switching between
workspaces with many windows open, many audio streams, many flash
videos running. Try and check if you feel a difference using the new
patch. You can try using both compiz and metacity and give us your
impression.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd --- please test new package

2009-06-06 Thread Thomas Foss
Quick question... does these freezes only happen when Compiz is enabled? I
think I have this bug (because I've got a 965GM chipset and Compiz is
disabled), but I've never had any freezes. Should I be re-enabling Compiz to
see if this patch fixes the problem, or will it remove the Compiz blacklist
automatically?

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Bernhard 
wrote:

> I tested with both compiz and metacity and with many audio and video
> streams simulanteously and it seems to me that this last archive green
> package has seriously improved my experience, especially in that there
> is no more audio and video stuttering. I never had freezes though, so
> I cannot say anything about that.
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in X.org xf86-video-intel: Confirmed
> Status in “compiz” source package in Ubuntu: In Progress
> Status in “xserver-xorg-video-intel” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
> Status in compiz in Ubuntu Jaunty: Fix Committed
> Status in xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu Jaunty: Confirmed
> Status in compiz in Ubuntu Karmic: In Progress
> Status in xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu Karmic: Fix Released
>
> Bug description:
> [Problem]
> Starting around 4/3, when mesa was upgraded from 7.3 to 7.4, several i965
> users started noticing X freeze after several hours of use, triggered by
> application usage especially noticeable with (but not unique to) compiz
> enabled.
>
> [Impact]
> The freeze bug affects a subset of i965 based systems, most particularly
> those using compiz.  Exact numbers cannot be determined, but may be as high
> as 25-50% based on rough estimates.
>
> The problem is severe:  An unpredictable lockup of the system that requires
> a power cycle to recover from.  For some users it comes on within minutes,
> while for others it comes after a few hours of use.
>
> [How Addressed in Development Version]
> For now, the patch being proposed for Jaunty has been uploaded to Karmic.
>
> Longer term, we plan to move from EXA to UXA once the latter is stable
> enough.  It has been found that while UXA exhibits other kinds of freezes,
> we've not yet been able to reproduce this particular freeze there.
>
> [Patch for Jaunty]
> A low-risk workaround that has proven effective at eliminating freezes, or
> at least greatly reducing their frequency, is to increase the Virtual
> framebuffer size.  Some users do this locally as a matter of course to gain
> dual-head support, so this setting has received extremely widespread testing
> already.
>
> The patch for Jaunty causes the Virtual size to be set to 2048x2048 if it
> is not otherwise specified.  Users can still override this with their own
> settings, larger or smaller, as desired.
>
> A side effect of this patch is that it also mitigates bug 158415 to a
> degree, which will make projector usage somewhat easier for this hardware
> because it will enable X to recognize higher resolutions available from the
> external monitor than were available on initial boot.
>
> [Test Case]
> The best method found to reproduce the bug is:
>  a.  Enable compiz
>  b.  Set your desktop to a 6x1 workspace layout
>  c.  Run http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25683477/repro.sh
>  d.  System will freeze anywhere from 1-20 min typically
>  e.  Power-button shutdown is required to reset the system
>
> [Regression Potential]
> In general, Virtual has been widely and extensively tested, so we do not
> expect this patch to trigger regressions.
>
> The patch is coded to only take effect on i965 systems, so the scope of any
> regression that might conceivably be triggered will be limited to just that
> hardware.
>
> [Suspects]
> Omitting obviously trivial, unrelated changes, here are what changed in
> several suspect packages in the timeframe in question:
>
> * intel driver:
>  4/01:  118_drop_legacy3d.patch: Removed Legacy3D
>  4/03:  114_fix_xv_with_non_gem.patch: Dropped since it caused regression
>  4/06:  119_drm_bo_unreference_needs_null.patch: Fixes various nullptr
> derefs
>  4/08:  120_fix_vt_switch.patch: Fix nullptr deref in video playback
>
> * xserver:
>  4/08:  177_animated_cursor_change_master.patch: fixes animated cursors
>  4/06:  174_set_bg_pixmap_of_cow_to_none.patch: Sets bg pixmap of
> composite overlay window to None
>  3/30:  172_cwgetbackingpicture_nullptr_check.patch: fix race condition
> when minimzing/maximizing firefox with flash video playing.
>
> * mesa:
>  4/03:  7.4 released
>* Added MESA_GLX_FORCE_DIRECT env var for Xlib/software driver
>* GLSL version 1.20 is returnd by the GL_SHADING_LANGUAGE_VERSION query
>* glGetActiveUniform() returned wrong size for some array types
>* Fixed some error checking in glUniform()
>* Fixed a potential glTexImage('proxy target') segfault
>* Fixed bad reference counting for 1D/2D texture arrays
>* Fixed VBO + glPush/PopC

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd --- please test new package

2009-06-06 Thread Bernhard
I tested with both compiz and metacity and with many audio and video
streams simulanteously and it seems to me that this last archive green
package has seriously improved my experience, especially in that there
is no more audio and video stuttering. I never had freezes though, so
I cannot say anything about that.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd --- please test new package

2009-06-06 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello all,

many thanks to Albert Damen for his comprehensive analysis. The cited
kernel patches are only for UXA and don't backport well, so we won't
backport them to Jaunty (at least not now). However, his aperture
patch already got good feedback and seems to fix the problem in a much
better way than the previous VirtualSize workaround which is currently
sitting in -proposed.

Can people who are affected by this and who run a standard
configuration (i. e. NO UXA, NO KMS, NO 2.6.30 kernel, etc.) please
enable this PPA and test the updated -intel driver there?

  https://launchpad.net/~bryceharrington/+archive/green

Please report positive and negative feedback about this package here.
(Please no further feedback about "I also have this problem", or
problems with UXA).

Thank you!

Martin

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-05 Thread Mario
reini wrote:
> I experience two bugs:
> a) this one (where the mouse is still responsive after freeze)
> b) another one (where, after the freeze, the mouse doesn't react
>anymore, either)
> 
> a) seems hasn't occured for me with the current driver since I
>applied Albert's patch. It occurred quite frequently after I
>downgraded to 2.4 (using the same link you provided above).
> b) never really had a chance of occurring before I applied Albert's
>patch (since it seems quite rare) and only occurred once since.

I can say that I have the same situation on my GM45: I used to have both
the kinds of freeze (with/without a live mouse pointer). I'm actually
using the jaunty-proposed package (2:2.6.3-0ubuntu9.2) with the personal
addition of the Albert's patch. I can say that the system is more stable
without any freeze of type A (with live mouse pointer). Sometime I have
freeze of type B: I'm able to reboot with SysReq sequences.

Mario

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-05 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Il giorno gio, 04/06/2009 alle 21.01 +, José Tomás Atria ha scritto:
> IMHO, please stop with all the discussion about what should have been
> done, or if linux is ready for the desktop and whatnot.
> 
> We have a stable release that is recommended as stable to users. ALL
> users.
> 
> this stable release has a known problem with intel drivers, the
> problem was reported as a bug and is being worked on. This is the
> proper way to address the issue.
> 

This stable release has been consciously released broken - forget the
deadlock, also extreme slowness with compiz was known since jaunty alpha
1, much earlier than the 3rd of April. The driver should not have landed
beta and should be removed from stable, that's what I am saying.

Of course since I am not an authority I think it is good to ask Bryce
who actually is an authority in Xorg/ubuntu. Maybe there are very good
reasons why we don't want the old driver in ubuntu. 

V.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-05 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Il giorno gio, 04/06/2009 alle 19.59 +, reini ha scritto:
> 
> 
> I'd like to point out that I tried the old (i.e. intrepid) driver 
> version (don't remember where I found it - it was somewhere in the 
> ubuntu wiki AFAIR). It didn't change the freezing problem at all 
> (made it worse if anything).
> 
> So switching back to the old driver isn't really a very helpful 
> suggestion...
> 

But to clarify: does plain intrepid work for you? I think there are at
least two different deadlockers in jaunty. I know this because I have a
machine with an ATI and with the intel centrino chipset. It deadlocked a
lot. Upgrading to the karmic kernel fixed this. OTOH, I have a machine
with an intel video card. Downgrading the video driver fixed that. So
are you sure you are experiencing the same bug? 

V.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-05 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Il giorno gio, 04/06/2009 alle 18.48 +, Thomas Foss ha scritto:
> How would one reinstall the old driver? I didn't think it was an
> option.
> Heck, I'd downgrade back to Intrepid if I there was a way to do it.
> There
> should be a "downgrade" button that's as big and shiny as the Jaunty
> upgrade
> button was.
> (Or maybe the upgrade buttons could just have little warning labels on
> the
> side... like cigarettes do.)
> 

It's easy; here is the link, it worked well for me even though compiz is
a bit slower (but I am using EXA and not UXA with the old driver because
it is not strictly necessary to use the latter).

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReinhardTartler/X/RevertingIntelDriverTo2.4

Check the Xorg logs before and after doing it to be sure that the driver
version changed (when the intel driver is loaded a string containing
"intel" and the version is shown in /var/log/Xorg.0.log, can't be more
precise because I am using another machine now).

Vincenzo

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-05 Thread Bernhard
Of course Ubuntu recommends using jaunty. But the main issue here is
the Intel driver, so you cannot purely blame Ubuntu for this
particular problem. So it may be better to continue this discussion on
the freedesktop forum or send complaint mails to Intel?

I don't want to annoy Intel devs (since we really depend on them now
more than ever), but I wouldn't be surprised if they said: "Hey, we
have this new GEM idea, let's first test it with Linux kernels before
we use it on commercial software."

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-05 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Il giorno gio, 04/06/2009 alle 20.29 +, Noel J. Bergman ha scritto:
> But then again MOST users should not be
> running Jaunty.  They should be running either Hardy or at most
> Intrepid.

Ubuntu was born from debian for the two purposes of having a predictable
release cycle and high usability. Ubuntu never endorsed using old
releases; instead, fixes for non-LTS and non current releases are
usually not done unless they are security fixes. In other words, using
past releases is unsupported and not adviced by ubuntu. What you are
describing above is debian.

Vincenzo

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-04 Thread reini
Am Donnerstag 04 Juni 2009 schrieb José Tomás Atria:
> is there any way to check the upgrade path to determine what else
> was updated on april 3rd?
>
> Because we are certain that the clean vanilla jaunty install
> doesn't have this issue, right?
>
> right?

The live CD has the issue, therefore so does "clean vanilla" jaunty.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-04 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
@José Tomás: Clean vanilla jaunty has this issue. It was released on
April 23rd. The development version before April 3rd did not have this
issue. It should be possible to get an alpha version from before this
date, but I don't think the in-between packages are readily available.

@zwaldowski: I don't think you qualify as a "normal user". You seem to
be far to technically apt for that. While it is pretty hard to get
bugs in Jaunty fixed now (the upstream developers aren't terribly
interested in fixing "old" stuff, the SRU process is cumbersome but
necessary to avoid breaking new things in a stable release), this is a
great time to get bugs fixed in Karmic. This is not a recommended
workaround for "normal users", but it is the way technically
knowledgable users like yourself can help make sure the problems are
addressed before the next version. If you file a new bug report
(preferably with the ubuntu-bug command) using Karmic, that will
definitely help. Karmic also has better tools for debugging freezes
like this.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-04 Thread José Tomás Atria
is there any way to check the upgrade path to determine what else was
updated on april 3rd?

Because we are certain that the clean vanilla jaunty install doesn't
have this issue, right?

right?

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:21 PM, zwaldowski  wrote:
> I still maintain that the version available in Jaunty Proposed has not
> fixed my problems, nor has the Intrepid version.  In fact, I still get
> the freezing problem after I spent two hours upgrading to Karmic the
> other night.
>
> To those who defend the existence of this bug by saying we "normal
> users" should've all stayed on Intrepid, I find this statement insulting
> and incredibly unfriendly.  If Ubuntu really intended for users to stay
> a release behind, then there wouldn't be a gigantic shiny UPGRADE button
> every time users check for updates.  Nor would Ubuntu.com have "9.04 is
> out - UPGRADE NOW."  Nor would UbuntuForums.org close the Intrepid-based
> support forums.
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-04 Thread José Tomás Atria
IMHO, please stop with all the discussion about what should have been
done, or if linux is ready for the desktop and whatnot.

We have a stable release that is recommended as stable to users. ALL
users.

this stable release has a known problem with intel drivers, the
problem was reported as a bug and is being worked on. This is the
proper way to address the issue.

When a workaround is found, it should be recommended to all users, or
if it entails a regression, it should be pushed into the update path
as a temporary fix (unitl now, i haven't found the problem again with
the updated intel drivers in the jaunty backports).

"upgrade to karmic alpha" is not a viable workaround for users, so
please, recommend what to do to avoid this problem within jaunty,
while the bug is solved.

Has anyone bothered to thoroughly check which update produced the
error for the first time?

-- 
entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-04 Thread moky
At present, with a 6 months release
> cycle, users should probably be considering moving to a release around
> the time its successor is released.  Or staying with an LTS, and
> upgrading when the successor's .1 comes out.
>   


By the way, this is what most of people do with Windows. Even more : 
most of Windows users just stay with their OS until buying a new computer.

If we want to look in a "very end-user" perspective, a computer is only 
supposed to work with the OS it was shipped with. Dell sold me a 
computer which is supposed to work with Hardy, and it does work with 
hardy. The fact to install a Jaunty *is not* an end-user behavior. The 
first line of the GPL is very clear on that point ;)

Laurent

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-04 Thread Thomas Foss
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:59 PM, reini  wrote:

> Am Donnerstag 04 Juni 2009 schrieb ichudov:
> > On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 06:00:37PM -, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> > > In this case, putting the old driver back in the distribution
> > > and starting to chose the right driver based on user's feedback
> > > until the too many intel issues are solved, would be mandatory.
> >
> > I tend to agree with you.
>
> I'd like to point out that I tried the old (i.e. intrepid) driver
> version (don't remember where I found it - it was somewhere in the
> ubuntu wiki AFAIR). It didn't change the freezing problem at all
> (made it worse if anything).
>
> So switching back to the old driver isn't really a very helpful
> suggestion...
>
>  --reini


That's very odd... the problem definitely wasn't around in Intrepid, at
least for me.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-04 Thread ichudov
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 06:00:37PM -, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 04/06/2009 alle 13.17 +, ichudov ha scritto:
> > When people say "Linux is not ready for desktop", this is what they
> > mean.
> > 
> 
> As a 12-years old (as a linux user) linux user, I have to say it's true.
> I hoped for a long time that Ubuntu would have been different. 

I am a "14 years old" Linux user, I used it as my primary OS since
1995, when I bought my first own PC I put Linux on it.

And I have to say that there are many projects in GNU/Linux that have a
great history of very careful, thoughtful software development, such
as editors, binutils, gcc, apache, perl etc. These have self tests,
etc and go through a very rigorous development process, so I never
hesitate to trust them with my business. They find bugs automatically
and fix discovered bugs. 

However, I think that any sort of a project that "does not fix bugs"
may lose trust, and has a limited future, and I am greatly hoping that
Ubuntu would not take that route.

We cannot really recommend to people to "switch to pre-alpha Karmic",
either.

I do realize that 1) GUI stuff is not as amenable to automatic testing
and 2) Ubuntu is trying to do this on a shoestring budget, so the
situation is understandable, but in some ways it is unfortunate.

I am a 100% Ubuntu user, this is what I use at home and what we have
at work, so this is not meant to be jeering from sidelines. But I do
feel that I have a deep interest in seeing my platform remain a
reliable, trusted friend. 

Personally, on the balance of "wanting new cool stuff" versus "wanting
to have reliable software", I tend to be skewed for the latter.

> In this case, putting the old driver back in the distribution and
> starting to chose the right driver based on user's feedback until the
> too many intel issues are solved, would be mandatory.

I tend to agree with you.

i

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-04 Thread Thomas Foss
How would one reinstall the old driver? I didn't think it was an option.
Heck, I'd downgrade back to Intrepid if I there was a way to do it. There
should be a "downgrade" button that's as big and shiny as the Jaunty upgrade
button was.
(Or maybe the upgrade buttons could just have little warning labels on the
side... like cigarettes do.)

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Vincenzo Ciancia
wrote:

> Il giorno gio, 04/06/2009 alle 20.00 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia ha scritto:
> >
> >
> > In this case, putting the old driver back in the distribution and
> > starting to chose the right driver based on user's feedback until the
> > too many intel issues are solved, would be mandatory.
> >
> > @Bryce, it's easy to put back the old driver in the distribution, and
> > if
> > there is not enough manpower to create the whitelist, I would chose
> > the
> > old one as a default. May I ask you "why not"?
> >
>
> A piece is missing here "the whitelist" would be created based on user
> feedback to enable the new driver only for those combinations where it
> actually works. I said "works" without any attributes :)
>
> V.
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in X.org xf86-video-intel: Confirmed
> Status in “compiz” source package in Ubuntu: In Progress
> Status in “xserver-xorg-video-intel” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
> Status in compiz in Ubuntu Jaunty: Fix Committed
> Status in xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu Jaunty: Confirmed
> Status in compiz in Ubuntu Karmic: In Progress
> Status in xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu Karmic: Fix Released
>
> Bug description:
> [Problem]
> Starting around 4/3, when mesa was upgraded from 7.3 to 7.4, several i965
> users started noticing X freeze after several hours of use, triggered by
> application usage especially noticeable with (but not unique to) compiz
> enabled.
>
> [Impact]
> The freeze bug affects a subset of i965 based systems, most particularly
> those using compiz.  Exact numbers cannot be determined, but may be as high
> as 25-50% based on rough estimates.
>
> The problem is severe:  An unpredictable lockup of the system that requires
> a power cycle to recover from.  For some users it comes on within minutes,
> while for others it comes after a few hours of use.
>
> [How Addressed in Development Version]
> For now, the patch being proposed for Jaunty has been uploaded to Karmic.
>
> Longer term, we plan to move from EXA to UXA once the latter is stable
> enough.  It has been found that while UXA exhibits other kinds of freezes,
> we've not yet been able to reproduce this particular freeze there.
>
> [Patch for Jaunty]
> A low-risk workaround that has proven effective at eliminating freezes, or
> at least greatly reducing their frequency, is to increase the Virtual
> framebuffer size.  Some users do this locally as a matter of course to gain
> dual-head support, so this setting has received extremely widespread testing
> already.
>
> The patch for Jaunty causes the Virtual size to be set to 2048x2048 if it
> is not otherwise specified.  Users can still override this with their own
> settings, larger or smaller, as desired.
>
> A side effect of this patch is that it also mitigates bug 158415 to a
> degree, which will make projector usage somewhat easier for this hardware
> because it will enable X to recognize higher resolutions available from the
> external monitor than were available on initial boot.
>
> [Test Case]
> The best method found to reproduce the bug is:
>  a.  Enable compiz
>  b.  Set your desktop to a 6x1 workspace layout
>  c.  Run http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25683477/repro.sh
>  d.  System will freeze anywhere from 1-20 min typically
>  e.  Power-button shutdown is required to reset the system
>
> [Regression Potential]
> In general, Virtual has been widely and extensively tested, so we do not
> expect this patch to trigger regressions.
>
> The patch is coded to only take effect on i965 systems, so the scope of any
> regression that might conceivably be triggered will be limited to just that
> hardware.
>
> [Suspects]
> Omitting obviously trivial, unrelated changes, here are what changed in
> several suspect packages in the timeframe in question:
>
> * intel driver:
>  4/01:  118_drop_legacy3d.patch: Removed Legacy3D
>  4/03:  114_fix_xv_with_non_gem.patch: Dropped since it caused regression
>  4/06:  119_drm_bo_unreference_needs_null.patch: Fixes various nullptr
> derefs
>  4/08:  120_fix_vt_switch.patch: Fix nullptr deref in video playback
>
> * xserver:
>  4/08:  177_animated_cursor_change_master.patch: fixes animated cursors
>  4/06:  174_set_bg_pixmap_of_cow_to_none.patch: Sets bg pixmap of
> composite overlay window to None
>  3/30:  172_cwgetbackingpicture_nullptr_check.patch: fix race condition
> when minimzing/maximizing firefox with flash video playing.
>
> * mesa:
>  4/03: 

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-04 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Il giorno gio, 04/06/2009 alle 20.00 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia ha scritto:
> 
> 
> In this case, putting the old driver back in the distribution and
> starting to chose the right driver based on user's feedback until the
> too many intel issues are solved, would be mandatory.
> 
> @Bryce, it's easy to put back the old driver in the distribution, and
> if
> there is not enough manpower to create the whitelist, I would chose
> the
> old one as a default. May I ask you "why not"? 
> 

A piece is missing here "the whitelist" would be created based on user
feedback to enable the new driver only for those combinations where it
actually works. I said "works" without any attributes :)

V.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-04 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Il giorno gio, 04/06/2009 alle 13.17 +, ichudov ha scritto:
> When people say "Linux is not ready for desktop", this is what they
> mean.
> 

As a 12-years old (as a linux user) linux user, I have to say it's true.
I hoped for a long time that Ubuntu would have been different. 

In this case, putting the old driver back in the distribution and
starting to chose the right driver based on user's feedback until the
too many intel issues are solved, would be mandatory.

@Bryce, it's easy to put back the old driver in the distribution, and if
there is not enough manpower to create the whitelist, I would chose the
old one as a default. May I ask you "why not"? 

The old driver is already "available" in jaunty in a PPA; but the point
here is to provide a system that works out of the box. I recall
everybody that current intel driver is also extremely slow unless you
tweak Xorg.conf. Which is not something we expect from the ordinary
_ubuntu_ user.

It was already unacceptable to have jaunty ship broken. But if in karmic
issues are not solved, please, please, rethink the decision of using the
new driver. It's just too early. If intel sees that no one wants their
new puppie, they'll start improving it.

Vincenzo

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-04 Thread Thomas Foss
You can say that again...

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:17 PM, ichudov  wrote:

> When people say "Linux is not ready for desktop", this is what they
> mean.
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in X.org xf86-video-intel: Confirmed
> Status in “compiz” source package in Ubuntu: In Progress
> Status in “xserver-xorg-video-intel” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
> Status in compiz in Ubuntu Jaunty: Fix Committed
> Status in xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu Jaunty: Confirmed
> Status in compiz in Ubuntu Karmic: In Progress
> Status in xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu Karmic: Fix Released
>
> Bug description:
> [Problem]
> Starting around 4/3, when mesa was upgraded from 7.3 to 7.4, several i965
> users started noticing X freeze after several hours of use, triggered by
> application usage especially noticeable with (but not unique to) compiz
> enabled.
>
> [Impact]
> The freeze bug affects a subset of i965 based systems, most particularly
> those using compiz.  Exact numbers cannot be determined, but may be as high
> as 25-50% based on rough estimates.
>
> The problem is severe:  An unpredictable lockup of the system that requires
> a power cycle to recover from.  For some users it comes on within minutes,
> while for others it comes after a few hours of use.
>
> [How Addressed in Development Version]
> For now, the patch being proposed for Jaunty has been uploaded to Karmic.
>
> Longer term, we plan to move from EXA to UXA once the latter is stable
> enough.  It has been found that while UXA exhibits other kinds of freezes,
> we've not yet been able to reproduce this particular freeze there.
>
> [Patch for Jaunty]
> A low-risk workaround that has proven effective at eliminating freezes, or
> at least greatly reducing their frequency, is to increase the Virtual
> framebuffer size.  Some users do this locally as a matter of course to gain
> dual-head support, so this setting has received extremely widespread testing
> already.
>
> The patch for Jaunty causes the Virtual size to be set to 2048x2048 if it
> is not otherwise specified.  Users can still override this with their own
> settings, larger or smaller, as desired.
>
> A side effect of this patch is that it also mitigates bug 158415 to a
> degree, which will make projector usage somewhat easier for this hardware
> because it will enable X to recognize higher resolutions available from the
> external monitor than were available on initial boot.
>
> [Test Case]
> The best method found to reproduce the bug is:
>  a.  Enable compiz
>  b.  Set your desktop to a 6x1 workspace layout
>  c.  Run http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25683477/repro.sh
>  d.  System will freeze anywhere from 1-20 min typically
>  e.  Power-button shutdown is required to reset the system
>
> [Regression Potential]
> In general, Virtual has been widely and extensively tested, so we do not
> expect this patch to trigger regressions.
>
> The patch is coded to only take effect on i965 systems, so the scope of any
> regression that might conceivably be triggered will be limited to just that
> hardware.
>
> [Suspects]
> Omitting obviously trivial, unrelated changes, here are what changed in
> several suspect packages in the timeframe in question:
>
> * intel driver:
>  4/01:  118_drop_legacy3d.patch: Removed Legacy3D
>  4/03:  114_fix_xv_with_non_gem.patch: Dropped since it caused regression
>  4/06:  119_drm_bo_unreference_needs_null.patch: Fixes various nullptr
> derefs
>  4/08:  120_fix_vt_switch.patch: Fix nullptr deref in video playback
>
> * xserver:
>  4/08:  177_animated_cursor_change_master.patch: fixes animated cursors
>  4/06:  174_set_bg_pixmap_of_cow_to_none.patch: Sets bg pixmap of
> composite overlay window to None
>  3/30:  172_cwgetbackingpicture_nullptr_check.patch: fix race condition
> when minimzing/maximizing firefox with flash video playing.
>
> * mesa:
>  4/03:  7.4 released
>* Added MESA_GLX_FORCE_DIRECT env var for Xlib/software driver
>* GLSL version 1.20 is returnd by the GL_SHADING_LANGUAGE_VERSION query
>* glGetActiveUniform() returned wrong size for some array types
>* Fixed some error checking in glUniform()
>* Fixed a potential glTexImage('proxy target') segfault
>* Fixed bad reference counting for 1D/2D texture arrays
>* Fixed VBO + glPush/PopClientAttrib() bug #19835
>   * Assorted i965 driver bug fixes
>* Fixed a Windows compilation failure in s_triangle.c
>* Fixed a GLSL array indexing bug
>* Fixes for building on Haiku
>
> * linux:
>  4/04:  2.6.28-11.41:  Revert MCHBAR patch
>  4/02:  2.6.28-11.40:  Add MCHBAR patch
>
> * libdrm:
>  4/04:  02_libdrm_nouveau_update.patch: Only affects nouveau code
>  3/29:  libdrm-nouveau1.symbols: Probably innocuous
>
> [Workarounds]
> Various people have found one or more of the following have helped to
> reduce the f

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-06-03 Thread José Tomás Atria
+1 at Bernhard. I have been following this bug closely, and i read the
whole 300+ comments, but i got lost in regards as to which packages
are affected, and what versions should introduce fixes, apart from the
backported xserver-xorg-video-intel mentioned above.

@Bryce: could you give us a little more info on he current status of
the bug, to further help isolating the issue and the affected
packages?

thanks!


On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Bernhard  wrote:
> @Bryce: I think most people here don't want to upgrade to an alpha
> karmic. There should be more documentation on how jaunty users can get
> the "supposedly better" karmic packages. I also understand zwaldowski's
> question like that, pls provide more info on what are the "supposedly
> patched" packages and how to install them on jaunty.
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-28 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 13:35 +, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:38:38AM -, Gustavo Narea wrote:
> > Jgull8502 said:
> > > I have a Dell m1330 Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated
> > > Graphics Controller (rev 0c). I've been holding off upgrading because of
> > > the intel bugs. I'm wondering if it's relatively safe to upgrade to 9.04
> > > now. I don't mind doing some configuring but I'm wondering if there's a
> > > condensed list of things I can try if I experience this freezing.
> > 
> > I have the same hardware and, as I reported here recently, this bug is 
> > solved 
> > with UXA:
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/UxaTesting
> > 
> > UXA works perfectly here. Just add that line to you X config, reboot
> > and enjoy your Ubuntu install.
> > 
> > UXA fixes all the bugs of the previous driver: Display corruptions and X 
> > freezes. Plus, it doesn't introduce _any_ bugs.
> 
> Caveat emptor.  When I tried UXA on Intel GM965 in Jaunty, I suffered
> from two show-stopper bugs: (1) memory leak that would eat up all the
> RAM within a day or two, causing all applications to be swapped out and
> (2) X would crash on every suspend & resume, requiring me to log in
> again and restart all the apps.  Both bugs affected me with stock Jaunty
> driver as well as xserver-xorg-video-intel 2.7.1 from the ubuntu-x-swat
> PPA.

I see the exact same problems with UXA too (and kernel 2.6.30-rc7 plus
the intel driver from git for that matter).

So I guess these should be reported upstream.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-28 Thread Thomas Foss
As was mentioned before, this bug does not exist in UXA... I wouldn't really
call it a "fix", it simply never arose in that code. But there are many
unrelated valid reasons why Ubuntu doesn't use UXA yet.

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Marius Gedminas  wrote:

> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:38:38AM -, Gustavo Narea wrote:
> > Jgull8502 said:
> > > I have a Dell m1330 Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated
> > > Graphics Controller (rev 0c). I've been holding off upgrading because
> of
> > > the intel bugs. I'm wondering if it's relatively safe to upgrade to
> 9.04
> > > now. I don't mind doing some configuring but I'm wondering if there's a
> > > condensed list of things I can try if I experience this freezing.
> >
> > I have the same hardware and, as I reported here recently, this bug is
> solved
> > with UXA:
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/UxaTesting
> >
> > UXA works perfectly here. Just add that line to you X config, reboot
> > and enjoy your Ubuntu install.
> >
> > UXA fixes all the bugs of the previous driver: Display corruptions and X
> > freezes. Plus, it doesn't introduce _any_ bugs.
>
> Caveat emptor.  When I tried UXA on Intel GM965 in Jaunty, I suffered
> from two show-stopper bugs: (1) memory leak that would eat up all the
> RAM within a day or two, causing all applications to be swapped out and
> (2) X would crash on every suspend & resume, requiring me to log in
> again and restart all the apps.  Both bugs affected me with stock Jaunty
> driver as well as xserver-xorg-video-intel 2.7.1 from the ubuntu-x-swat
> PPA.
>
> So, I wouldn't recommend UXA as the panacea.
>
> Marius Gedminas
> --
> It is a mess, pure and simple.  Sucks to be away from Unix, huh?
>-- man perlfaq3
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in X.org xf86-video-intel: Confirmed
> Status in “compiz” source package in Ubuntu: In Progress
> Status in “xserver-xorg-video-intel” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
> Status in compiz in Ubuntu Jaunty: Fix Committed
> Status in xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu Jaunty: Confirmed
> Status in compiz in Ubuntu Karmic: In Progress
> Status in xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu Karmic: Fix Released
>
> Bug description:
> [Problem]
> Starting around 4/3, when mesa was upgraded from 7.3 to 7.4, several i965
> users started noticing X freeze after several hours of use, triggered by
> application usage especially noticeable with (but not unique to) compiz
> enabled.
>
> [Impact]
> The freeze bug affects a subset of i965 based systems, most particularly
> those using compiz.  Exact numbers cannot be determined, but may be as high
> as 25-50% based on rough estimates.
>
> The problem is severe:  An unpredictable lockup of the system that requires
> a power cycle to recover from.  For some users it comes on within minutes,
> while for others it comes after a few hours of use.
>
> [How Addressed in Development Version]
> For now, the patch being proposed for Jaunty has been uploaded to Karmic.
>
> Longer term, we plan to move from EXA to UXA once the latter is stable
> enough.  It has been found that while UXA exhibits other kinds of freezes,
> we've not yet been able to reproduce this particular freeze there.
>
> [Patch for Jaunty]
> A low-risk workaround that has proven effective at eliminating freezes, or
> at least greatly reducing their frequency, is to increase the Virtual
> framebuffer size.  Some users do this locally as a matter of course to gain
> dual-head support, so this setting has received extremely widespread testing
> already.
>
> The patch for Jaunty causes the Virtual size to be set to 2048x2048 if it
> is not otherwise specified.  Users can still override this with their own
> settings, larger or smaller, as desired.
>
> A side effect of this patch is that it also mitigates bug 158415 to a
> degree, which will make projector usage somewhat easier for this hardware
> because it will enable X to recognize higher resolutions available from the
> external monitor than were available on initial boot.
>
> [Test Case]
> The best method found to reproduce the bug is:
>  a.  Enable compiz
>  b.  Set your desktop to a 6x1 workspace layout
>  c.  Run http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25683477/repro.sh
>  d.  System will freeze anywhere from 1-20 min typically
>  e.  Power-button shutdown is required to reset the system
>
> [Regression Potential]
> In general, Virtual has been widely and extensively tested, so we do not
> expect this patch to trigger regressions.
>
> The patch is coded to only take effect on i965 systems, so the scope of any
> regression that might conceivably be triggered will be limited to just that
> hardware.
>
> [Suspects]
> Omitting obviously trivial, unrelated changes, here are what changed in
> several suspect packages in the timeframe in question:
>
> * intel driver:
>  4/01:  118_drop_legacy3d.

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-28 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:38:38AM -, Gustavo Narea wrote:
> Jgull8502 said:
> > I have a Dell m1330 Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated
> > Graphics Controller (rev 0c). I've been holding off upgrading because of
> > the intel bugs. I'm wondering if it's relatively safe to upgrade to 9.04
> > now. I don't mind doing some configuring but I'm wondering if there's a
> > condensed list of things I can try if I experience this freezing.
> 
> I have the same hardware and, as I reported here recently, this bug is solved 
> with UXA:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/UxaTesting
> 
> UXA works perfectly here. Just add that line to you X config, reboot
> and enjoy your Ubuntu install.
> 
> UXA fixes all the bugs of the previous driver: Display corruptions and X 
> freezes. Plus, it doesn't introduce _any_ bugs.

Caveat emptor.  When I tried UXA on Intel GM965 in Jaunty, I suffered
from two show-stopper bugs: (1) memory leak that would eat up all the
RAM within a day or two, causing all applications to be swapped out and
(2) X would crash on every suspend & resume, requiring me to log in
again and restart all the apps.  Both bugs affected me with stock Jaunty
driver as well as xserver-xorg-video-intel 2.7.1 from the ubuntu-x-swat
PPA.

So, I wouldn't recommend UXA as the panacea.

Marius Gedminas
-- 
It is a mess, pure and simple.  Sucks to be away from Unix, huh?
-- man perlfaq3

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-28 Thread Gustavo Narea
Jgull8502 said:
> I have a Dell m1330 Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated
> Graphics Controller (rev 0c). I've been holding off upgrading because of
> the intel bugs. I'm wondering if it's relatively safe to upgrade to 9.04
> now. I don't mind doing some configuring but I'm wondering if there's a
> condensed list of things I can try if I experience this freezing.

I have the same hardware and, as I reported here recently, this bug is solved 
with UXA:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/UxaTesting

UXA works perfectly here. Just add that line to you X config, reboot and enjoy 
your Ubuntu install.

UXA fixes all the bugs of the previous driver: Display corruptions and X 
freezes. Plus, it doesn't introduce _any_ bugs.

So, I'd really recommend it to you.
-- 
Gustavo Narea .
| Tech blog: =Gustavo/(+blog)/tech  ~  About me: =Gustavo/about |

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-27 Thread Jithin Emmanuel
You better not upgrade. Wait till stable drivers are available. It also
needs 2.6.30 kernel. And I believe that is never going to be available in
jaunty, So you better wait till karmic is released. Hope it will be fixed by
then.

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Jgull8502 
wrote:

> I've been following this bug for a while, but not as closely in the past
> week or too.
>
> I have a Dell m1330 Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated
> Graphics Controller (rev 0c). I've been holding off upgrading because of
> the intel bugs. I'm wondering if it's relatively safe to upgrade to 9.04
> now. I don't mind doing some configuring but I'm wondering if there's a
> condensed list of things I can try if I experience this freezing.
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Regards
Jithin Emmanuel
http://spotm.in
Helen Rowland
- "One man's folly is another man's wife."

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-26 Thread Alwin Garside
On May 26, 2009 7:25 PM, "Geir Ove Myhr"  wrote:

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Dave Conniff wrote: > I saw there was some
new stuff in the xorg ...
There's a very noticable warning on the PPA page:
https://launchpad.net/~xorg-edgers/+archive/ppa
The XXA and EXA code has been deleted from the git master tree, so for
any drivers above the 2.7 branch, setting AccelMethod do not change
anything. Xorg-edgers is the latest development version after all.

-- [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392 You received this...

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-26 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Dave Conniff  wrote:
> I saw there was some new stuff in the xorg crack pushers ppa, so I
> downgraded to jaunty native from the x-update repo, and the updated into
> the crack-pushers repoOn my first reboot I noticed that despite my
> xorg config that the new builds had me using UXA, not sure if that is
> intended or not, but perhaps a warning about it would be nice...

There's a very noticable warning on the PPA page:
https://launchpad.net/~xorg-edgers/+archive/ppa
The XXA and EXA code has been deleted from the git master tree, so for
any drivers above the 2.7 branch, setting AccelMethod do not change
anything. Xorg-edgers is the latest development version after all.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-26 Thread Oded Arbel
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 16:09 +, Dave Conniff wrote:

> however I experienced a
> lockup on launching a video using mplayer's xv Intel(R) Video Overlay
> option, which had been fixing the horrible screen tearing I have been
> getting on every driver and kernel I have tested (which is all of them
> I
> think).  The lock up involved giving me aandom green screen, and no
> control over anyting.  I am currently running kernel 2.6.29.4 because
> it
> seems to be giving me the best video performance, Keep in mind that
> this
> is in UXA now, and I haven't experienced any hard lockups like this in
> UXA with any of the prior drivers, although there had been plenty of
> memory leaks which prevented me from using UXA as my deault..I
> realize this is a little off this bug topic, but it happend while
> attempting a fix for this bug so I thought I would mention itAlso
> it
> doesn't happen every time I open a video with that option, although
> the
> systems behavior becomes odd every time I do it

I'm having a similar problem on Fedora 11
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499245) on GMA 945. Its not
100% the same problem (for example, xv works fine for me, its SDL that
freezes), but its more likely to be related to your problem this this
launchpad ticket.

The Fedora freeze also seems to be Intel driver related. I'm really not
pointing fingers anywhere and I got relatively very little flak on my
machines compared to other people on the list, but the Intel GMA driver
scenario is pretty horrible right now - I'm actually advising people not
to upgrade and to buy non-Intel graphics.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-22 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Il giorno ven, 22/05/2009 alle 02.01 +, mlissner ha scritto:
> So is it safe to say that if the singapore picture (above) doesn't
> freeze our system when we have compiz on, that we don't have this bug?
> That's my reading of it, but I haven't read all 500 comments.


No I don't think it is safe to say so because I had these freezes even
while seeing the picture in firefox (dunno why it doesn't work now).
However, I can't be sure I have the same freeze.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-22 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 06:04:59AM -, Bernhard wrote:
> I never had any freezes at all but my whole system is just increadibly
> slow with compiz. Correct me if I'm wrong but this is not just about
> singapore-like freezes, it's about performance and memory leaks of intel
> video cards.

*This* bug is about freezes on i965 with EXA.

Extreme Compiz slowness ought to be a different bug, though I cannot
give you a link right now.

BTW have you tried disabling vsync in compiz and in driconf?  That
helped a lot for me (using EXA; I had no extreme slowness in UXA by
which I suspect vsync is broken with UXA).

Marius Gedminas
-- 
But perhaps ISO's central secretariat follows just the common industry
practice pioneered by Microsoft: "We will get it right in the third
release."
-- Markus Kuhn on ISO 10646 PDF CD-ROM edition

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-22 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Il giorno gio, 21/05/2009 alle 16.03 +, zwaldowski ha scritto:
> 
> On odd note, though:  my now-standard test of looking at the Wikimedia
> picture above was passed, but Firefox blacks out the image as soon as
> it
> finishes downloading.  I'm going to wget it right now and see if the
> system can display it normally, otherwise, we need to get this fix in
> as
> soon as possible.

I have the freeze mentioned in this bug, but the image loaded properly
for me in firefox. Now it is black (bug in firefox?) but if I download
it I can see it. But different programs may use xlib in different ways,
so that means nothing.


-- 
It is also important to note that hedgehogs do not actually hurt each 
other when they get close to one another. Actually, when living in 
groups, hedgehogs often sleep close to each other. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedgehog%27s_dilemma

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-20 Thread Matthias Blaicher
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Jithin Emmanuel  wrote:
> fixed means where? how can i get the fix.

It should be included in the next build of the xorg-edgers PPA (
https://launchpad.net/~xorg-edgers ), but be aware that once you
installed this PPA it's quiet hard to get rid of it again... Please
read the warnings on the website.

I guess it would be wise to wait for the next release of the intel
driver and use the ubuntu-x-swat  PPA
(https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat )

So, enough bug spam

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-20 Thread Jithin Emmanuel
fixed means where? how can i get the fix.

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Matthias Blaicher
wrote:

> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Jithin Emmanuel 
> wrote:
> > Found best way to reproduce this bug. Visit this web page
> >
> >
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b7/Singapore_port_panorama.jpg
> >
> > Got from http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14594
>
> This has now been fixed, see
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20152#c32
> Maybe it can be backported, as this crash really feels like the one
> described in this bug here. I doubt it is the same one, but I guess
> bug reports are beeing mixed...
>
> ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #20152
>   https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20152
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Regards
Jithin Emmanuel
http://spotm.in
Rodney 
Dangerfield
- "I worked in a pet store and people would ask how big I would get."

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-18 Thread eagles051387
for me and my issue with nvidia freezing it seems to be solved in the
alpha in karmic. could this be an issue with jaunty kernel?

On 5/18/09, Albert Damen  wrote:
> Based on Eric Anholt's findings about freezes due to prefetching beyond
> end of aperture (b.fd.o 21488), I have done some testing.
>
> With Eric's patch applied in kernel 2.6.30-rc6 I still got the freeze. That
> seemed to make sense: we are using EXA, and the exa offscreen buffer is
> using the last page in aperture. So BO's wouldn't use the last page in our
> case anyways.
> Then I patched -intel and pushed back the exa offscreen buffer 4 kB below
> end of aperture (0x0ed3f000-0x0fffefff: exa offscreen). That still gave the
> freeze.
> Then I pushed a bit harder, now by 32MB (0x0cd4-0x0dff: exa
> offscreen) --> No freeze anymore.
>
> The 32MB was not a random choice: it matches the 32 MB classic texture
> buffer we had until beginning of April, which was sitting between exa
> offscreen and end of aperture. Dropping patch 118_drop_legacy3d.patch,
> which removed the (unused) classic texture buffer, also solves the
> freeze issue for me. So maybe that patch (dated 1 April) has been the
> trigger for this bug?
>
> Now the question is: Is something writing or reading beyond the end of
> the exa offscreen buffer? Without the 32 MB unused memory after the exa
> offscreen buffer, that would be beyond end of aperture. How can I find
> what is doing that?
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Jonathan Aquilina

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-18 Thread eagles051387
dont forget though im not even on an intel chipset but an nforce 750i
chipset. it was rather prevalent for me in jaunty wiht nvidia 180.44
driver in repos but wiht the same driver in karmic it seems like it
was something else as the issue has yet to surface.

On 5/18/09, Jithin Emmanuel  wrote:
> Of course it will be in karmic just visit this url to test.
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b7/Singapore_port_panorama.jpg
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:31 PM, eagles051387
> wrote:
>
>> on jaunty i have been seeing the same thing but im not on an intel
>> chipset but an nvidia nforce 750i. i have to do a hard reboot to get
>> it working. im currently testing this out to see if the same issues
>> arises in karmic.
>>
>> On 5/18/09, Vincenzo Ciancia  wrote:
>> > I have a machine affected by this bug, but also another laptop showing
>> > exactly the same form of sudden deadlocks, using an ATI radeon. Now the
>> > point is that this is a centrino laptop, and the chipset is the same of
>> > the other laptop. May this be not a bug in the video driver but
>> > somewhere else (e.g. PCI code?).
>> >
>> > --
>> > [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
>> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
>> > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
>> > of the bug.
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jonathan Aquilina
>>
>> --
>> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
>> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
>> of the bug.
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards
> Jithin Emmanuel
> http://spotm.in
> P. J. O'Rourke
> - "Never fight an inanimate object."
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Jonathan Aquilina

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-18 Thread Jithin Emmanuel
Of course it will be in karmic just visit this url to test.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b7/Singapore_port_panorama.jpg

On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:31 PM, eagles051387
wrote:

> on jaunty i have been seeing the same thing but im not on an intel
> chipset but an nvidia nforce 750i. i have to do a hard reboot to get
> it working. im currently testing this out to see if the same issues
> arises in karmic.
>
> On 5/18/09, Vincenzo Ciancia  wrote:
> > I have a machine affected by this bug, but also another laptop showing
> > exactly the same form of sudden deadlocks, using an ATI radeon. Now the
> > point is that this is a centrino laptop, and the chipset is the same of
> > the other laptop. May this be not a bug in the video driver but
> > somewhere else (e.g. PCI code?).
> >
> > --
> > [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> > of the bug.
> >
>
>
> --
> Jonathan Aquilina
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Regards
Jithin Emmanuel
http://spotm.in
P. J. O'Rourke
- "Never fight an inanimate object."

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-18 Thread eagles051387
on jaunty i have been seeing the same thing but im not on an intel
chipset but an nvidia nforce 750i. i have to do a hard reboot to get
it working. im currently testing this out to see if the same issues
arises in karmic.

On 5/18/09, Vincenzo Ciancia  wrote:
> I have a machine affected by this bug, but also another laptop showing
> exactly the same form of sudden deadlocks, using an ATI radeon. Now the
> point is that this is a centrino laptop, and the chipset is the same of
> the other laptop. May this be not a bug in the video driver but
> somewhere else (e.g. PCI code?).
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Jonathan Aquilina

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-18 Thread Mario
Jithin Emmanuel wrote:
> Got from http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14594

They says that the bug is still present in the 2.7.1 version of the
driver. They also speak about a possible patch for the kernel.

Mario

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-15 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
>> You have GM45 chipset. Some of the newer chipsets don't list the
>> numbers and names in the lspci, so I prefer to look in Xorg.0.log.
>
> But is it supposed to be an affected chipset? Before of the
> workaround-upload I had a lot of freezes: now they are quiet rare. If I
> have a further freeze should, I open a new bug report?

I don't know if it is supposed to be. That is, I don't know if the
driver treats the 965GM and GM45 differently in any way. What I do
know is that the function IS_I965G in the driver returns true for the
GM45 chipset (see my first long comment on bug 370777), so it may be
similar enough that it is the same underlying problem. The workaround
uses the IS_I965G function to decide whether to apply it or not, so it
will be applied to your GM45 chipset.

However, all the duplicates of this bug were reported on 965GM
chipsets, so I think it is best to keep it separate until proven
otherwise (or someone who knows the hardware and the driver well says
that they're basically the same). If you can get GPU dumps from a
freeze using the 2.7.1 driver from the x-updates PPA (Personal Package
Archive) and file it in a separate bug report, I think that may be
helpful.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-15 Thread Mario
Geir Ove Myhr wrote:
> You have GM45 chipset. Some of the newer chipsets don't list the
> numbers and names in the lspci, so I prefer to look in Xorg.0.log.

But is it supposed to be an affected chipset? Before of the
workaround-upload I had a lot of freezes: now they are quiet rare. If I
have a further freeze should, I open a new bug report?

Mario

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-15 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> I am not convinced as I am having *this bug* on a i945 too. Why not ssh
> into the machine and get a backtrace of Xorg to see if it is the same
> problem?

You may very well have the same symptoms on an i945. It just that
debugging is much easier if we keep the bug reports for different
chipsets separate, and debugging is really our goal here. Please ssh
into the machine and get a backtrace (or more importantly a GPU dump
as described in this bug report). But please upload it to a separate
bug report. If it turns out to be a duplicate of some other bug, it
can be marked as such. If it doesn't add any new information to that
duplicate bug it avoids having lots of redundant information in the
bug report, and any new information can be added in a comment to that
other report. Our goal here is to keep the bug reports simple, since
that makes debugging easier.

Mario wrote:
> I'm not so sure about my card. How can I identify it?
>
> $ lspci | grep -i graphic
> 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset PCI
> Express Graphics Port (rev ff)
> 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series
> Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 07)
>
> from xorg.log:
> (II) intel(0): Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) Mobile Intel® GM45
> Express Chipset
> (--) intel(0): Chipset: "Mobile Intel® GM45 Express Chipset"

You have GM45 chipset. Some of the newer chipsets don't list the
numbers and names in the lspci, so I prefer to look in Xorg.0.log.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-15 Thread Mario
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> I am not convinced as I am having *this bug* on a i945 too. Why not ssh
> into the machine and get a backtrace of Xorg to see if it is the same
> problem?

I'm not so sure about my card. How can I identify it?

$ lspci | grep -i graphic
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset PCI
Express Graphics Port (rev ff)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series
Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 07)

from xorg.log:
(II) intel(0): Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) Mobile Intel® GM45
Express Chipset
(--) intel(0): Chipset: "Mobile Intel® GM45 Express Chipset"

Mario

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-15 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 03:11 +, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 03:14:38PM -, Žygimantas Beručka wrote:
> > Geir Ove Myhr, I don't think there's a real need for another duplicate.
> 
> Yes, there is.  Even if this ultimately turns out to be the same bug, it's
> very important for our ability to triage bugs that people with different
> hardware open separate bug reports, unless otherwise indicated by the
> developers.  Otherwise, when the freezes people are seeing *aren't* related
> (and there's no evidence either way yet in the present case), lumping all
> the comments in a single report just makes it incredibly hard for the
> developers to extract relevant information from that report.
> 
> So please open a separate bug report for your problem.

I am not convinced as I am having *this bug* on a i945 too. Why not ssh
into the machine and get a backtrace of Xorg to see if it is the same
problem?

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 03:14:38PM -, Žygimantas Beručka wrote:
> Geir Ove Myhr, I don't think there's a real need for another duplicate.

Yes, there is.  Even if this ultimately turns out to be the same bug, it's
very important for our ability to triage bugs that people with different
hardware open separate bug reports, unless otherwise indicated by the
developers.  Otherwise, when the freezes people are seeing *aren't* related
(and there's no evidence either way yet in the present case), lumping all
the comments in a single report just makes it incredibly hard for the
developers to extract relevant information from that report.

So please open a separate bug report for your problem.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-14 Thread Jithin Emmanuel
Maybe we should stop trying to do workarounds and hacks for 965 and try to
understand the bigger picture of what is actually happening.

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Geir Ove Myhr 
wrote:

> Žygimantas Beručka, This bug report is about freezes happening on the
> 965GM chipset, starting with the update on April 3rd. This bug has 5
> duplicates. They are all for the 965GM chipsets (I just double-checked
> that).
>
> I'm not saying that you and bullinger don't have a real bug, only that
> commenting on this bug is not going to help. The underlying cause that
> makes the GPU on 965GM chipsets lock up, is probably different from the
> underlying cause for the freezes on your i855 chipset.
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Regards
Jithin Emmanuel
http://spotm.in
Bill Cosby   -
"Fatherhood is pretending the present you love most is soap-on-a-rope."

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-14 Thread Matthias Blaicher
I am using UXA with compiz and 3464x1152 resolution, and it flies for
me So no regressions for here (I use UXA since jaunty beta though,
maybe I am not spoiled with speed)

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-14 Thread Joachim Nilsson
Jithin Emmanuel wrote, on 05/14/2009 09:47 AM:
> This 2.7.1 drivers impact performance hugely.  It makes desktop usage
> painfully slow.

I must respectfully disagree.  My compiz has never been this snappy
before.  Stability wise it is also a lot better than the stock intel
driver in Ubuntu 9.04.  My system has been running flawlessly since
yesterday with Compiz and UXA enabled. Otoh I only run Firefox,
Thunderbird, evince a couple of terminals and Emacs.

Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller
[8086:2a02] (rev 0c)

Really not a fun bug to triage, best of luck to you Ubunteros as well as
Intel engineers!

Regards
 /Joachim

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-13 Thread Jithin Emmanuel
I also noticed that with uxa performance worsens with new drivers. Then I
removed uxa from xorg.conf. Still performance is not that satisfactory.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:29 AM, zwaldowski  wrote:

> Well, strike that, 2.7.1 doesn't solve a things.  Back on Xorg-edgers,
> waiting for the next freeze to happen.  Why is this still listed as Fix
> Committed?
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Regards
Jithin Emmanuel
http://spotm.in
Vince Lombardi
- "We didn't lose the game; we just ran out of time."

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-13 Thread Jithin Emmanuel
That's one costly fall back mechanism. Reminds me of days when I was using
windows. Just make me laugh on that so called *fall back* mechanism.

2009/5/13 Botond Szász 

> @Alwin Garside:
> Mostly agree with you, but:
>
> > And the advantage of fixed 6 month schedules is that you can easily
> fall back to an earlier release...
>
> What exactly is that * easy * fall back mechanism? Reinstall?
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Regards
Jithin Emmanuel
http://spotm.in
Don Marquis 
- "Procrastination is the art of keeping up with yesterday."

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-13 Thread moky
vervelover a écrit :
> Well, I totally understand who is seeking for a new distro, maybe one
> that really is for human beings. Because you favor the geeks, giving
> them the latest and greatest, 'cause they know what a ppa is and
> whatever.  But you know if you were serious about a distro for human
> beings, you should have delayed jaunty or at least have it shipped with
> Intrepid's intel drivers. It's a big let down for everyone that believes
> in open-source being the future of computing, and sees ubuntu as the
> biggest hope for spreading linux in the world. But ubuntu's just not
> there, and maybe never will because it's more concerned about not losing
> its geek user base, than releasing and operating system for everyone,
> and perhaps ever will.
>   
I do agree.  Regarding bug number one, one could notice that MS leaves 
more testing time between the beta version and the final version than 
Ubuntu for a whole cycle.

Please, if the aim of LTS version is to provide a certified stable OS, 
do not advertise the other versions, especially when there still remains 
a critical crash for a widespread GPU.
Now, I'm obliged to tell all my friends I converted to Linux (namely : 
Ubuntu) to not update to Jaunty because there is a critical bug that 
makes the computer simply unusable.

I have nothing against the fact to *release* Jaunty with that bug, but I 
don't understand why there should be a big button "DOWNLOAD UBUNTU 9.04; 
enjoy an improved user experience" on the main page www.ubuntu.com.


A part of that, I'm sincerely grateful for all your work to make free 
software more human. I didn't paid for Ubuntu[1] and I know the first 
line of GPL : No warranty ;)


[1] Although, I paid for a Dell with Gutsy pre-installed.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-13 Thread Alwin Garside
true "human beings" could also just opt to stick to 8.10 or choose the 8.04
LTS release. "Human Beings" should read release notes. And the advantage of
fixed 6 month schedules is that you can easily fall back to an earlier
release...

On May 13, 2009 2:05 PM, "vervelover"  wrote:

Well, I totally understand who is seeking for a new distro, maybe one
that really is for human beings. Because you favor the geeks, giving
them the latest and greatest, 'cause they know what a ppa is and
whatever.  But you know if you were serious about a distro for human
beings, you should have delayed jaunty or at least have it shipped with
Intrepid's intel drivers. It's a big let down for everyone that believes
in open-source being the future of computing, and sees ubuntu as the
biggest hope for spreading linux in the world. But ubuntu's just not
there, and maybe never will because it's more concerned about not losing
its geek user base, than releasing and operating system for everyone,
and perhaps ever will.

-- [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392 You received this...

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-13 Thread Mario
Jithin Emmanuel wrote:
> Will this 2.7.1 driver be made available to jaunty updates soon.

I guess it is not possible: the maintainers could backport the patches
but it maybe difficult.

Mario

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-13 Thread Jithin Emmanuel
Will this 2.7.1 driver be made available to jaunty updates soon.

On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Joachim Nilsson <
joachim.nils...@vmlinux.org> wrote:

> Bryce Harrington wrote, on 05/13/2009 10:37 AM:
> > 2.7.1 advertises some freeze fixes.  I've packaged it for jaunty.  It's
> available in the x-updates ppa:
> > https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-updates/
>
> Thanks, this is really incredible.  Now even UXA seems to work fine,
> doing bizarre Compiz effects have never been this smooth before on my
> ThinkPad T61.
>
> Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller
> [8086:2a02] (rev 0c)
>
> # A 1920x1200 external display and a 1280x800 LCD built-in
> # gives a rather large Virtual.
> Section "Screen"
>Identifier  "Configured Screen Device"
>Device  "Configured Video Device"
>SubSection "Display"
>Virtual 3200 1200
>EndSubSection
> EndSection
>
> Section "Device"
>Identifier  "Configured Video Device"
>Option  "AccelMethod"   "uxa"
> EndSection
>
> The repos I use are standard Jaunty repos, including proposed updates,
> and this X Swat PPA. Nothing more.
>
> Again, thank you!
>  /Joachim
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Regards
Jithin Emmanuel
http://spotm.in
Jay Leno   -
"Don't forget Mother's Day. Or as they call it in Beverly Hills, Dad's Third
Wife Day."

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-13 Thread Joachim Nilsson
Bryce Harrington wrote, on 05/13/2009 10:37 AM:
> 2.7.1 advertises some freeze fixes.  I've packaged it for jaunty.  It's 
> available in the x-updates ppa:
> https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-updates/

Thanks, this is really incredible.  Now even UXA seems to work fine,
doing bizarre Compiz effects have never been this smooth before on my
ThinkPad T61.

Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller
[8086:2a02] (rev 0c)

# A 1920x1200 external display and a 1280x800 LCD built-in
# gives a rather large Virtual.
Section "Screen"
Identifier  "Configured Screen Device"
Device  "Configured Video Device"
SubSection "Display"
Virtual 3200 1200
EndSubSection
EndSection

Section "Device"
Identifier  "Configured Video Device"
Option  "AccelMethod"   "uxa"
EndSection

The repos I use are standard Jaunty repos, including proposed updates,
and this X Swat PPA. Nothing more.

Again, thank you!
 /Joachim

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-13 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 08:37 +, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> 2.7.1 advertises some freeze fixes.  I've packaged it for jaunty.  It's 
> available in the x-updates ppa:
> https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-updates/


The changelog sounds promising:

We have verified that several of the reported bugs of GPU crashes,
(mouse continues to move, but otherwise X is totally unresponsive), are
fixed with the commit by Keith Packard in 2.7.1 to correct the
computation of the batch space required. If you have previously reported
a GPU-crash bug in bugs.freedesktop.org, please test with 2.7.1 and
report your findings in the bug. If the crash is fixed, please celebrate
with us!

If the crash persists, please attach the output of intel_gpu_dump
available here (and hopefully packaged in your distribution of choice
soon):

git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
(Requires Linux kernel >= 2.6.30)

Thanks to everyone who has helped to improve this driver!


Thanks for packaging it so quickly and lets hope we can celebrate with
the developers :)

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-12 Thread Joachim Nilsson
Hi,

I just had to reply to you "off list", so to speak.  That answer was
very well put, thank you for taking the time to formulate and writing
it!

I have been sitting here, in my corner of the world, considering doing
the very same thing, but I guess I lack the proper words.

Thanks
 /Joachim - From Sweden, with the same bug, patiently awaiting the wizards to 
fix it. :)

Andres Mujica wrote, on 05/13/2009 05:53 AM:
> Jithin, Wirechief.  without your help debugging and testing workarounds
> and hacks for solving this issue we weren't where we are now, i mean at
> the very first appearence of this bug, 4-5 freezes per day was standard
> now we're about several weeks without freezes.
> 
> Sure you can look for a different distribution, but as this bug is
> crossdistro probably you'll face it again.  So please bear with us in
> the meantime.  I'm confident that this would be solved soon.  A lot of
> people are working on it.
> 
> Thanks again for all the patience and help that you provided here.
>

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-12 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 03:53 +, Andres Mujica wrote:
> Jithin, Wirechief.  without your help debugging and testing workarounds
> and hacks for solving this issue we weren't where we are now, i mean at
> the very first appearence of this bug, 4-5 freezes per day was standard
> now we're about several weeks without freezes.

YMMV, once per day here.

The problem here is, that 'we' don't know whether people are working on
it and also if there is anything 'we' can do to help. Please keep us
up-to-date.

> Sure you can look for a different distribution, but as this bug is
> crossdistro probably you'll face it again.  So please bear with us in
> the meantime.  I'm confident that this would be solved soon.  A lot of
> people are working on it.

The only thing to criticize here is that this showstopper was known
before jaunty was released, so IMHO it would have been worth delaying
jaunty (it now went through the press and might have caused more much
more damage).

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-12 Thread wirechief
I realize that this bug is present across all linux platforms, it is a
tough nut to crack and am willing to
bear out these freezes, knowing that uxa is not completely ready for
me is not a issue, I am not ready
to change course, if i should of given more information on my latest
freeze I can try to get it to come back
and provide whatever reporting i can.

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Andres Mujica
 wrote:
> Jithin, Wirechief.  without your help debugging and testing workarounds
> and hacks for solving this issue we weren't where we are now, i mean at
> the very first appearence of this bug, 4-5 freezes per day was standard
> now we're about several weeks without freezes.
>
> Sure you can look for a different distribution, but as this bug is
> crossdistro probably you'll face it again.  So please bear with us in
> the meantime.  I'm confident that this would be solved soon.  A lot of
> people are working on it.
>
> Thanks again for all the patience and help that you provided here.
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Reach out and share life, care for others,

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-11 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 18:02 +, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> I just experienced a freeze while running:
> 
> ii compiz 1:0.8.2-0ubuntu8.1 OpenGL window and compositing manager
> ii xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.6.3-0ubuntu9.1 X.Org X server -- Intel i8xx, 
> i9xx display d
> 
> which means the workaround seems to have not completely avoided the
> issue for me, only made it less frequent.

Matches my experience even with latest kernel (.30-rc5) and video-intel
from git (2.7.99+) - yes *with* uxa. Issue appears usually between 6 and
24 hours of use. I can still ssh into the machine etc...

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-06 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
@SebastianG: This has been fixed in 2.6.3-0ubuntu9.2 that hit
jaunty-proposed today. See bug 370777. If you don't want to wait until
it comes to your mirror, you can get a binary from
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/2:2.6.3-0ubuntu9.2
.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-05 Thread wirechief
It would make sense if someone could make a script that would test for
all the "proposed" fix's and those
users who are not meeting the test be advise that they are not running
the fix's and their results cannot be
judged valid against this bug. too many variables for an easy id of the fault..

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Ricardo Villalba
 wrote:
> One question:
> Is it equivalent to specify a Virtual Size of 2048 2048 in xorg.conf to use 
> the patched xserver-xorg-video-intel?
> I have a Dell Inspiron 1525 with GM965 X3100 Intel card and Kubuntu Jaunty 
> amd64
> I also have the latest repository available  mesa* and libgl* packages
> I use the following xorg.conf configuration and apparently fixes the freeze 
> (previously, my desktop freezes after  20, before using Alt SysRq K K):
>
> Section "Screen"
>  Identifier "Default Screen"
>  Monitor "Configured Monitor"
>  Device "Configured Video Device"
>  SubSection "Display"
>   Virtual 2048 2048
>  EndSubSection
> EndSection
>
> I also use the EXA and Greedy options.
> Thanks;
>
> --
> [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
Reach out and share life, care for others,

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-05 Thread Martin Pitt
Sebastian [2009-05-05  9:52 -]:
> There is a Problem with the
> 121_i965_default_to_virtual_2048_2048.patch in the
> xserver-xorg-video-intel-2:2.6.3-0ubuntu9.1 package.  If you specify
> a Virtual Resolution greater than 2048_2048 in the xorg.conf it
> simply will be ignored.

This was fixed in version 2.6.3-0ubuntu9.2 which is now in
jaunty-proposed for testing.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 359392] Re: [i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd

2009-05-04 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 10:48:50AM -, zwaldowski wrote:
> Martin, I thank you for your help, but I pride myself on the fact that I
> am neither a child nor an idiot.  I have now reinstalled Ubuntu *twice*
> in order to test everything again, and again, and again, and AGAIN.

zwaldowski, while I sympathize with the fact that your freeze is not
fixed by the tricks that have fixed other people's freezes, losing your
cool at Martin is not going to result in people wanting to help you.

For what it's worth, from the non-correlation of your freeze with the
workarounds others have found affected things for them, I suspect
whatever issue you have is unrelated.  Since we are focusing this bug on
the class of freeze which is mitigated by adjusting Virtual, if that
workaround does not affect your freeze, then you should look elsewhere
for a fix.

-- 
[i965] X freezes starting on April 3rd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359392
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


  1   2   3   >