[Bug 389048] Re: In full screen volume meter causes flicker
** Attachment added: "A screenshot of the volume box" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28067772/error.jpg -- In full screen volume meter causes flicker https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389048 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 389048] [NEW] In full screen volume meter causes flicker
Public bug reported: When you are watching a video and you press volume up/down a box appears in the top right corner to tell you the new volume level. However if you in full screen mode this creates a flicker on the screen as it seems to be creating a new layer for itself or something. This happens in any application that can go into full screen mode. There are other boxes that have the same problem. For example when you move onto the next song in your music player it tells the name of the song. However the same flicker appears. I have attached a screen shot of the volume box so that you can identify what i meant. thx Andrew ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- In full screen volume meter causes flicker https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389048 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 504359] Re: Splash screen image duplicating
Because of Plymouth being used in Lucid this bug is now fixed. ** Changed in: usplash (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- Splash screen image duplicating https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504359 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 389048] Re: In full screen volume meter causes flicker
Because of the new styling and shape in 9.10 the bug is now fixed. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Fix Released -- In full screen volume meter causes flicker https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389048 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 504359] [NEW] Splash screen image duplicating
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: usplash Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala usplash: Installed: 0.5.49 Candidate: 0.5.49 Version table: *** 0.5.49 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status When booting the normal ubuntu image in the centre of the screen appears (This is what should happen). However 9/10 times another image appear on then right horizontal to the centre image. The image on the right however is sometimes cut off at the bottom or top and is sometimes not fully 'illuminated'. It seems like the cache of the graphics card isn't been wiped and it displaying the image sin the cache over on the right. I can only see this on my larger screen (1920*1080) and not on my smaller one (1280*1024). So only some people my be able to see this error. Thanks in advance. Andy ** Affects: usplash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Splash screen image duplicating https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504359 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 504359] Re: Splash screen image duplicating
** Attachment added: "lspci-vnvn.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37559939/lspci-vnvn.log -- Splash screen image duplicating https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504359 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 504359] Re: Splash screen image duplicating
** Attachment added: "menu.lst" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37559945/menu.lst -- Splash screen image duplicating https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504359 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 504359] Re: Splash screen image duplicating
** Attachment added: "uname-a.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37559956/uname-a.txt -- Splash screen image duplicating https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504359 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 504359] Re: Splash screen image duplicating
** Attachment added: "usplash.conf" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37559962/usplash.conf -- Splash screen image duplicating https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504359 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 525383] [NEW] Mute button doesn't appear to work
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ardour Ardour 2.8.2 (built from revision 5396) Ubuntu 9.10 What happens: When playing if you press the mute button on any of the tracks it doesn't actually mute the track. Although the mixer levels (when set to post) go to nothing, meaning that nothing should be output. However the track is still playing and is still sent to the master output. What should happen: As above but the track should be muted and not sent to the main output. Thanks in advance Andy ** Affects: ardour (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Mute button doesn't appear to work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525383 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 525383] Re: Mute button doesn't appear to work
Ok it does work. (But i had to right-hand click on the Mute button and tick 'main outs'). Wouldn't it be more intuitive if either: -Main outs was set to be the selected option as default, so users wouldn't become frustrated because it doesn't seem to work. -Or If no options are ticked then when you click the mute button it asks which one would you like to tick. Andy -- Mute button doesn't appear to work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525383 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332355] Re: Empathy doesn't alert to new email messages
This would tip the boat to Empathy over Pidgin. As Empathy is the default it would be nice for it to notify you then have a like to the web mail ( like Pidgin ). Otherwise everyone will go back to Pidgin because of this extra functionality. So this is a deciding factor for me and many other people over which client they will use. -- Empathy doesn't alert to new email messages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332355 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1904640] Re: [SRU] [groovy] New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.8.3
** Summary changed: - Placeholder for 1.8.3 update + [SRU] [groovy] New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.8.3 ** Description changed: - https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/releases/tag/1.8.3 + This is a request to SRU the latest release of flatpak into groovy. + + [Impact] + + New upstream release of flatpak, which brings fixes and improvements. + + Groovy is currently at 1.8.2, whereas 1.8.3 is available upstream. + + [Test Case] + + The bugs being resolved are not simple to reproduce, see the test plan + below for testing flatpak itself. + + [Regression Potential] + + Flatpak has a test suite, which is run on build across all architectures + and passes. + + There is also a manual test plan + https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/flatpak. I have + confirmed that 1.8.3 passes with this test plan on groovy. + + Flatpak has autopkgtests enabled + http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/flatpak which is passing on + groovy. + + Regression potential is low, and upstream is very responsive to any + issues raised. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904640 Title: [SRU] [groovy] New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.8.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1904640/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1904640] Re: [SRU] [groovy] New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.8.3
** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904640 Title: [SRU] [groovy] New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.8.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1904640/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1812456] Re: [MIR] libflatpak0
tl;dr; Flatpak currently considers remotes as trusted, so after you have added one with a password at system level, you don't need a password to install apps for that remote. I don't about how polkit rules work, but this is just a comment describing what happens from a user perspective with flatpak. If you want to tighten it, I suggest discussing with upstream to ensure docs or any other assumptions etc are correct (please also ensure any changes make it into Debian, generally we have been able to avoid diffs with Debian so far - we do have a diff right now as Debian is in freeze). - Flatpak has two locations that you can add remotes and install apps to, user level and system level. System level ones are available to all users, user level ones are available to just that user - Adding a flatpak remote or installing an app at *user* level does not require any password So far I think this all makes sense, the interesting part up for debate is the next part. - When a remote is added to flatpak at *system* level, it asks for a password to verify the remote - When an app is installed at *system* level for this trusted remote, it installs without needing a password (as stated in previous comments, assuming the user is in the wheel group) To try this out you can do the following commands, the remote-add and remote-delete will need a password, the install and uninstall won't. $ flatpak remote-add --if-not-exists kdeapps --from https://distribute.kde.org/kdeapps.flatpakrepo $ flatpak install kdeapps org.kde.kate $ flatpak uninstall org.kde.kate $ flatpak remote-delete kdeapps -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812456 Title: [MIR] libflatpak0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1812456/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1918482] Re: Update for CVE-2021-21381
I've also done some exploratory testing of .desktop icon related tests from the test plan on a Bionic VM and things are working normally. $ apt policy flatpak flatpak: Installed: 1.0.9-0ubuntu0.3 Candidate: 1.0.9-0ubuntu0.3 Version table: *** 1.0.9-0ubuntu0.3 500 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-security-proposed/ppa/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1.0.9-0ubuntu0.2 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/universe amd64 Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security/universe amd64 Packages 0.11.3-3 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/universe amd64 Packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918482 Title: Update for CVE-2021-21381 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1918482/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1918482] Re: Update for CVE-2021-21381
@Steve Beattie, was there any progress on this or anything I can do to help ? Or is it just stuck in a queue of items to be reviewed? :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918482 Title: Update for CVE-2021-21381 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1918482/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1938351] [NEW] Merge steam 1.0.0.70-2 from debian experimental to ubuntu impish
Public bug reported: Debian has a newer version of steam packaging available, let's merge the changes into the Ubuntu version to bring us back into sync. (1.0.0.70 is the current Steam stable release, 1.0.0.71 is the beta for now. And Debian is in freezes, hence pulling from experimental). ** Affects: steam (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: steam (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen) ** Changed in: steam (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938351 Title: Merge steam 1.0.0.70-2 from debian experimental to ubuntu impish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/steam/+bug/1938351/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1903706] Re: Add flathub repository by default
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. The Ubuntu package of flatpak is synced from Debian, so any decision about whether to enable the flathub repository by default should be made there - as I do not want to create a delta between Ubuntu and Debian. Please report a bug against Debian if you think this should be the case, then once it is resolved the package will be synced in the latest Ubuntu development version. Furthermore the approach that Neon has used, by using a service, to enable flathub by default looks non-optimal, I think the preferred approach would be to use something like a drop in configuration file ( as described under custom installations here https://blogs.gnome.org/mclasen/2018/08/26/about-flatpak-installations/ ) - I am not sure if this only supports local repositories or could support flathub too though so it might need work. Until there is movement with Debian, I am going to mark this bug as "opinion". ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: New => Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903706 Title: Add flathub repository by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1903706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1904640] [NEW] Placeholder for 1.8.3 update
Public bug reported: https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/releases/tag/1.8.3 ** Affects: flatpak (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904640 Title: Placeholder for 1.8.3 update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1904640/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1906744] Re: xdg-document-portal creates a mountpoint which produces an error report from df
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1905623 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905623 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1905623, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Feel free to continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1905623 df: /run/user/1000/doc: Operation not permitted -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906744 Title: xdg-document-portal creates a mountpoint which produces an error report from df To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-desktop-portal/+bug/1906744/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1904640] Re: [SRU] [groovy] New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.8.3
Sorry, a binary sync was performed by mistake this should have been a source only sync. Flatpak 1.8.3 provides what upstream has decided are important fixes for users on the 1.8.x stable series, as you can see below some of the improvements fix crashes, error reporting, authentication, and user experience etc. Upstream state the changes are as follows: Fixed progress reporting for OCI and extra-data The in-memory summary cache is more efficient Fixed authentication getting stuck in a loop in some cases Fixed authentication error reporting We now extract OCI info for runtimes as well as apps Fixed crash if anonymous authentication fails and -y is specified flatpak info now only looks at the specified installation if one is specified Better error reporting for server HTTP errors during download Uninstall now removes applications before the runtime it depends on Fixed test-suite to pass with the latest OSTree version Fixed dbus environment variables in flatpak enter Avoid updating metadata from the remote when uninstalling Fixed error message handling in various places FlatpakTransaction now verifies all passed in refs to avoid potential issues with invalid names Updated translations As with previous accepted flatpak changes, these should not break ABI/API, tests are run during package build, autopkgtests are passing, and a manual test plan is executed. Let me know if I need to provide more information. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904640 Title: [SRU] [groovy] New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.8.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1904640/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1901689] Re: Merge steam 1.0.0.67-2 from debian sid to ubuntu hirsute
** Summary changed: - Merge steam 1.0.0.66-2 from debian sid to ubuntu hirsute + Merge steam 1.0.0.67-2 from debian sid to ubuntu hirsute -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901689 Title: Merge steam 1.0.0.67-2 from debian sid to ubuntu hirsute To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/steam/+bug/1901689/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1901689] Re: Merge steam 1.0.0.67-2 from debian sid to ubuntu hirsute
** Description changed: Debian has a newer version of steam packaging available, let's merge the changes into the Ubuntu version to bring us back into sync. + + Community testing of the package has been performed via discourse here + https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/call-for-testing-steam-in-hirsute- + hippo/19714 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901689 Title: Merge steam 1.0.0.67-2 from debian sid to ubuntu hirsute To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/steam/+bug/1901689/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1756098] Re: Potential cache upgrade issue in 3.28 results in unable to install flatpakref due to remote already existing
Sure, when I get a moment I'll firstly try to reproduce the issue with bionic by installing 3.27.92 and upgrading to 3.28 again. Then if I can confirm that the issue really does happen, I'll try an upgrade from artful (3.26.1). (I hope this was only an issue within the development branch and therefore not affect "real" users, but we'll see). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756098 Title: Potential cache upgrade issue in 3.28 results in unable to install flatpakref due to remote already existing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1756098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1756098] Re: Potential cache upgrade issue in 3.28 results in unable to install flatpakref due to remote already existing
I've not yet been able to reproduce this yet, but while investigating I've found that the cache folder for gnome-software (and therefore the gnome software flatpak plugin) has changed from 17.10 to 18.04 - so it might not be an issue for "real" users upgrading from 17.10? Eg the flatpak plugin cache folder has changed in the following ways for me: 17.10 ~/.cache/gnome-software/3.26/flatpak 18.04 ~/.cache/gnome-software/flatpak Although this does raise, why is the cache folder not ~/.cache/gnome- software/3.28 ? What will happen with 3.30 ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756098 Title: Potential cache upgrade issue in 3.28 results in unable to install flatpakref due to remote already existing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1756098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1778782] [NEW] New upstream microrelease ostree 2018.6
Public bug reported: Placeholder for SRU of new upstream micro-release. ** Affects: ostree (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: ostree (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ostree (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778782 Title: New upstream microrelease ostree 2018.6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ostree/+bug/1778782/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1778782] Re: New upstream microrelease ostree 2018.6
** Description changed: - Placeholder for SRU of new upstream micro-release. + This is a request to SRU the latest microrelease of ostree into bionic. + + [Impact] + + New upstream micro release of ostree, which brings fixes and + improvements to the stable series. + + Bionic is currently at 2018.4-2, whereas 2018.6 is available upstream. + + Note this is a requirement for enabling the stable release of flatpak + 1.0. + + [Test Case] + + The bugs being resolved are not simple to reproduce, see the test plan + below for testing of ostree. + + [Regression Potential] + + OSTree has a test suite, which is run on build across all architectures + and passes. + + I am using the flatpak manual test plan, as this is the main "user" of + libostree https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/flatpak. I + have confirmed that 2018.6 passes with this test plan. I have also done + exploratory testing of the ostree CLI. + + OSTree has autopkgtests enabled + http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/o/ostree which is passing on + bionic (except for armhf). + + Regression potential is low, and upstream is responsive to any issues + raised. + + [Other Info] + + There are changes to the build-depends (adding of libavahi) and + configure flags, these are due to the addition of p2p support - which is + a requirement of flatpak 1.0. + + The risk is low as the only "users" (rdepends of libostree-1-1 and + ostree) are flatpak and debos. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778782 Title: New upstream microrelease ostree 2018.6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ostree/+bug/1778782/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1778782] Re: [SRU] New upstream microrelease ostree 2018.6
** Summary changed: - New upstream microrelease ostree 2018.6 + [SRU] New upstream microrelease ostree 2018.6 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778782 Title: [SRU] New upstream microrelease ostree 2018.6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ostree/+bug/1778782/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1778782] Re: [SRU] New upstream microrelease ostree 2018.6
@Robie, thanks for looking at this. So Flatpak 1.0 is currently under pre-release/release candidate, and should hopefully be released in the next few weeks (at some point after GUADEC). As you have pointed out it might be a good idea to submit them together - so that they can be tested together. I am happy to wait until flatpak 1.0 is ready and submit them both to -proposed at the same time if this is your preferred route. Please advise if there is anything I need to do while we wait ? Can we just simply leave ostree in the queue ? (I suspect it'll only be a few weeks until flatpak 1.0 is ready). Also I have a personal PPA with the pre-release of flatpak 1.0 and ostree 2018.6 which I have been testing with :-) There is no particular reason for doing it either way, I was just submitting this in preparation of the future release - so if it makes testing/verification easier and reduces risk, lets do them together. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778782 Title: [SRU] New upstream microrelease ostree 2018.6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ostree/+bug/1778782/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1804954] Re: Themes work in Xorg but not Wayland sessions
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This seems strange, I have had other themes work on both X11 and Wayland - it could be an app specific issue, a theme issue, a runtime issue, a session issue etc. The fact you state Qt5 apps are working correctly suggests it might be an app/runtime issue. Can you post the output of the following command, so that we can see which theme extensions are installed ? $ flatpak list Could you post the output of the following command in both of the sessions to see which theme it thinks is in use? $ gtk-query-settings |grep -i gtk-theme Can you try installing org.gnome.Recipes and try that with both sessions to ensure it isn't an app specific issue. Until the info above is provided I will mark this bug as incomplete. ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804954 Title: Themes work in Xorg but not Wayland sessions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1804954/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1804954] Re: Themes work in Xorg but not Wayland sessions
Thanks for the extra info! Could you also try running gtk-query-settings from inside the sandbox when on wayland ? (eg running the following command) $ flatpak run --command=gtk-query-settings org.gnome.Recipes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804954 Title: Themes work in Xorg but not Wayland sessions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1804954/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1804954] Re: Themes work in Xorg but not Wayland sessions
Maybe, although it still seems a bit strange - i do wonder if snap and flatpak maybe conflicting somehow. For the communitheme-wayland session did you install that via a snap or PPA ? Also could you post the full output of the following commands (to pastebin if you prefer) to ensure that we are using the same versions of the app as me and the permissions are correct. Eg are you using the version from flathub or gnome-apps-nightly etc. $ flatpak list --show-details $ flatpak remotes --show-details $ flatpak info org.gnome.Recipes $ flatpak info --show-permissions org.gnome.Recipes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804954 Title: Themes work in Xorg but not Wayland sessions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1804954/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1804954] Re: Themes work in Xorg but not Wayland sessions
So you are definitely on the same version as me. I just tried with a virtual machine and was able to reproduce this after installing the communitheme snap session (and using the wayland variant). I will mark this as confirmed for now and discuss this issue with flatpak developers. ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804954 Title: Themes work in Xorg but not Wayland sessions - when using Communitheme snap sessions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1804954/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1804954] Re: Themes work in Xorg but not Wayland sessions - when using Communitheme snap sessions
** Summary changed: - Themes work in Xorg but not Wayland sessions + Themes work in Xorg but not Wayland sessions - when using Communitheme snap sessions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804954 Title: Themes work in Xorg but not Wayland sessions - when using Communitheme snap sessions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1804954/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1804167] Re: The problem after the transition to the test branch
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. So this seems like network manager failed to start correctly (?) and then some service trying to configure a flatpak repo became stuck. I have spoken to the flatpak developers and they are not aware of such a service (maybe it is something specific to KDE?). Also you have switched to an unstable branch, so maybe something is broken within that. Could you provide more information from syslog/journalctl ? Eg what caused network manager to fail (systemctl status NetworkManager-wait- online.service) and also look in syslog/journalctl for errors around the same time related to flatpak and copy them here ? Until there is more info as to what is happening I'll mark this as incomplete. ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804167 Title: The problem after the transition to the test branch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1804167/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1804954] Re: Themes work in Xorg but not Wayland sessions - when using Communitheme snap sessions
Hmm I also see this now, I'm pretty sure this worked before. I wonder why this is broken, it seems to be working in Debian Testing. I'll continue investigating, and post anything if I find something... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804954 Title: Themes work in Xorg but not Wayland sessions - when using Communitheme snap sessions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1804954/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1804954] Re: Themes work in Xorg but not Wayland sessions - when using Communitheme snap sessions
OK after much discussion with flatpak developers and testing things in VMs, we have found the reason this happens on wayland only ! Quote from TingPing, "dconf supports distros installing override files into the system, then when queried dconf will look at user setting, then fallback to distro setting, then fallback to default setting. In a sandbox we can ask dconf for the user setting but we don't have disk access to the override files". So what this means is that on wayland the flatpak can't read the default overrides from the session (eg Ubuntu choosing Ambiance and Minimise, Maximise, Close) as it doesn't have permission to read the system files only user ones. (this doesn't affect X11 sessions as gtk reads from xsettings instead). This will be solved when the settings portal [0] is used in xdg-desktop- portal, as that runs on the host outside of the sandbox it is able to read the necessary files. For now the workaround is to install gnome-tweaks, change your theme to something else and then back to Ambiance. Also for the window controls change one of them from true to false to true. This will then write user settings to dconf which the flatpak's can then read. As this will be solved in the next version of xdg-deskop-portal, I will close this bug for the flatpak package and open against xdg-desktop-portal. 0 - https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/pull/245 ** Summary changed: - Themes work in Xorg but not Wayland sessions - when using Communitheme snap sessions + dconf overrides are not read by flatpaks on wayland sessions ** Description changed: + "dconf supports distros installing override files into the system, then + when queried dconf will look at user setting, then fallback to distro + setting, then fallback to default setting. In a sandbox we can ask dconf + for the user setting but we don't have disk access to the override + files" + + So what this means is that on wayland flatpaks can't read the default + overrides from the session (eg Ubuntu choosing Ambiance and Minimise, + Maximise, Close etc) as it doesn't have permission to read the system + files only user ones. (this doesn't affect X11 sessions as gtk reads + from xsettings instead). + + This will be solved when the settings portal [0] is used in xdg-desktop- + portal, as that runs on the host outside of the sandbox it is able to + read the necessary files. + + # Workaround + + Install gnome-tweaks, change your theme to something else and then back + to Ambiance. Also for the window controls change one of them from true + to false to true. This will then write user settings to dconf which the + flatpak's can then read. + + + 0 - https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/pull/245 + + + === Original Description === + System: Ubuntu 18.04.1 Flatpak version: 1.0.6-flatpak1~bionic (from https://launchpad.net/~alexlarsson/+archive/ubuntu/flatpak) Description: Flatpaks using GTK3 default to the Adwaita theme in a Wayland Gnome session. In Xorg sesions they are themed correctly. The attached screenshots demonstrate the same version of Gnome Builder running in Communitheme-Wayland and Communitheme-Xorg. However, flatpaks that use Qt5 (like KeepassXC) seem to be themed correctly under Wayland. ** Also affects: xdg-desktop-portal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: xdg-desktop-portal (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804954 Title: dconf overrides are not read by flatpaks on wayland sessions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1804954/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1806220] [NEW] New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.X
Public bug reported: Placeholder for SRU of new upstream 1.0.X micro-release. ** Affects: flatpak (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen) ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1806220 Title: New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.X To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1806220/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1806220] Re: New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.6
** Summary changed: - New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.X + New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.6 ** Description changed: - Placeholder for SRU of new upstream 1.0.X micro-release. + This is a request to SRU the latest release of flatpak into bionic and + cosmic. + + [Impact] + + New upstream release of flatpak, which brings fixes and improvements. + + Bionic is currently at 1.0.1, whereas 1.0.6 is available upstream. + Cosmic is currently at 1.0.4, whereas 1.0.6 is available upstream. + + [Test Case] + + The bugs being resolved are not simple to reproduce, see the test plan + below for testing flatpak itself. + + [Regression Potential] + + Flatpak has a test suite, which is run on build across all architectures + and passes. + + There is also a manual test plan + https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/flatpak. I have + confirmed that 1.0.6 passes with this test plan on both bionic and + cosmic. + + Flatpak has autopkgtests enabled + http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/flatpak which is passing on + bionic and cosmic. + + Regression potential is low, and upstream is very responsive to any + issues raised. ** Summary changed: - New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.6 + [SRU] New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.6 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1806220 Title: [SRU] New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1806220/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1787917] Re: New upstream release flatpak 1.0
** Summary changed: - New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0 + New upstream release flatpak 1.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1787917 Title: New upstream release flatpak 1.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1787917/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1787917] Re: New upstream release flatpak 1.0
** Description changed: - Placeholder for SRU of new upstream micro-release. + This is a placeholder for a new upstream release of flatpak. + = + + + This is a request to SRU the latest release of flatpak into bionic. + + + [Impact] + + New upstream release of flatpak, which brings fixes and improvements. + + Bionic is currently at 0.11.7, whereas 1.0.1 is available upstream. + + 1.0.X is a LTS version of the 0.11.X series, so it will be supported for + a longer period of time and will have fixes backported from future + series. + + + [Test Case] + + The bugs being resolved are not simple to reproduce, see the test plan + below for testing flatpak itself. + + + [Regression Potential] + + Flatpak has a test suite, which is run on build across all architectures + and passes. + + There is also a manual test plan + https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/flatpak. I have + confirmed that 1.0.1 passes with this test plan. + + Flatpak has autopkgtests enabled + http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/flatpak which is passing on + bionic. + + Regression potential is low, and upstream is very responsive to any + issues raised. + + + [Other info] + + Flatpak requires an updated ostree (at least 2018.7), which is being + submitted in bug 1778782 + + I know that this debdiff is very large, please consider that a large + amount is translations, documentation, code which was restructured + internally and that this includes more than one upstream release. I'm + also happy to do any extra QA that is required. + + To assist in your review I have collated the following stats: + debdiff +57629 -28689 86318 100.0% + translations+17595 -10386 2798132.4% + docs+ 4833 - 824 5657 6.6% + code+35201 -17479 5268061.0% + It's difficult to calculate the noise due to the code restructure, but it could be a large amount of the "code" removals. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1787917 Title: New upstream release flatpak 1.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1787917/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1778782] Re: [SRU] New upstream microrelease ostree 2018.6
The 2018.6 release in Debian included new rust bindings, these were then removed in the next release - which has resulted in a smaller debdiff than before. I have also disabled avahi so there isn't a new build- depends. I'm going to provisionally update the bug description to match the changes which will likely be submitted in a future upload. ** Summary changed: - [SRU] New upstream microrelease ostree 2018.6 + [SRU] New upstream release ostree 2018.8 ** Description changed: This is a request to SRU the latest release of ostree into bionic. [Impact] - New upstream micro release of ostree, which brings fixes and - improvements to the stable series. + New upstream release of ostree, which brings fixes and improvements to + the stable series. - Bionic is currently at 2018.4-2, whereas 2018.6 is available upstream. + Bionic is currently at 2018.4-2, whereas 2018.8 is available upstream. Note this is a requirement for enabling the stable release of flatpak 1.0. [Test Case] The bugs being resolved are not simple to reproduce, see the test plan below for testing of ostree. [Regression Potential] OSTree has a test suite, which is run on build across all architectures and passes. I am using the flatpak manual test plan, as this is the main "user" of libostree https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/flatpak. I - have confirmed that 2018.6 passes with this test plan. I have also done + have confirmed that 2018.8 passes with this test plan. I have also done exploratory testing of the ostree CLI. OSTree has autopkgtests enabled http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/o/ostree which is passing on bionic (except for armhf). Regression potential is low, and upstream is responsive to any issues raised. [Other Info] - There are changes to the build-depends (adding of libavahi) and - configure flags, these are due to the addition of p2p support - which is - a requirement of flatpak 1.0. - The risk is low as the only "users" (rdepends of libostree-1-1 and ostree) are flatpak and debos. + + Flatpak 1.0 SRU requires this change and therefore this should be + submitted together with bug 1787917. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778782 Title: [SRU] New upstream release ostree 2018.8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ostree/+bug/1778782/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1791553] [NEW] Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed
Public bug reported: What happened: 1) Install Ubuntu Cosmic daily build 2) Launch gnome-software 3.30 3) Click on the app menu, notice there is no "update preferences" 4) Install gnome-software-plugin-flatpak 5) Restart gnome-software 3.30 6) Notice there is still no "update preferences" What I expected to happen: I expected "update preferences" to be shown as a menu in gnome-software. However I understand that only packagekit + snap are installed by default - which both don't currently have support for this toggle (maybe snap will in the future?) So I would expect that the "update preferences" menu is shown after installing the flatpak plugin at step 6. I have submitted a merge request here [0] which shows this menu when the flatpak plugin is enabled. I think this is important for this option to be available when the user has installed the flatpak plugin, as it was a feature listed in the GNOME 3.30 release notes and announced across many news publications - having this option not visible in Ubuntu will only result in bad press. 0 - https://gitlab.gnome.org/Community/Ubuntu/gnome-software/merge_requests/5 ** Affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791553 Title: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1791553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1791553] Re: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed
I have added (LP: 1791553) to the commit message (as seen in a previous commit). Yes, I agree it could be a good idea to mention that this is currently flatpak only. What would you suggest? Rename "Update Preferences" to "Flatpak Update Preferences" or mention in the dialog itself somewhere ? Maybe Robert has a better idea. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791553 Title: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1791553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1791553] Re: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed
To keep this bug in the loop, the merge request https://gitlab.gnome.org/Community/Ubuntu/gnome- software/merge_requests/5 landed in ubuntu-master, but ubuntu-3-30 has different code so the patch couldn't be applied. I will create another merge for ubuntu-3-30. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791553 Title: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1791553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1787917] Re: New upstream release flatpak 1.0
** Description changed: - This is a placeholder for a new upstream release of flatpak. - = - - This is a request to SRU the latest release of flatpak into bionic. - [Impact] New upstream release of flatpak, which brings fixes and improvements. Bionic is currently at 0.11.7, whereas 1.0.1 is available upstream. 1.0.X is a LTS version of the 0.11.X series, so it will be supported for a longer period of time and will have fixes backported from future series. - [Test Case] The bugs being resolved are not simple to reproduce, see the test plan below for testing flatpak itself. - [Regression Potential] Flatpak has a test suite, which is run on build across all architectures and passes. There is also a manual test plan https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/flatpak. I have confirmed that 1.0.1 passes with this test plan. Flatpak has autopkgtests enabled http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/flatpak which is passing on bionic. Regression potential is low, and upstream is very responsive to any issues raised. - [Other info] Flatpak requires an updated ostree (at least 2018.7), which is being submitted in bug 1778782 I know that this debdiff is very large, please consider that a large amount is translations, documentation, code which was restructured internally and that this includes more than one upstream release. I'm also happy to do any extra QA that is required. To assist in your review I have collated the following stats: debdiff +57629 -28689 86318 100.0% translations+17595 -10386 2798132.4% docs+ 4833 - 824 5657 6.6% code+35201 -17479 5268061.0% It's difficult to calculate the noise due to the code restructure, but it could be a large amount of the "code" removals. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1787917 Title: New upstream release flatpak 1.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1787917/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1791553] Re: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed
I have created a merge request https://gitlab.gnome.org/Community/Ubuntu /gnome-software/merge_requests/7/ for the ubuntu-3-30 branch for cosmic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791553 Title: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1791553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1791553] Re: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed
This was fixed as part of the 3.30.2 release from bug 1789451, so I marking this bug as fixed released. I have also tested on an Ubuntu Cosmic daily iso that after installing gnome-software-plugin-flatpak that the menu now becomes available. Thanks! ** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791553 Title: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1791553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1754864] Re: Flatpak related refs are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu 18.04
I believe this issue is resolved in cosmic and is only an issue in bionic. Normally such issues are marked as "Fix Released" for "ubuntu" and then proposed to the series bionic. I don't have the permissions to do this, Robert do you normally work with this workflow ? Also I will test the normal flatpak manual test plan (which includes gnome-software UI tests) against this change once it is in -proposed to confirm this doesn't regress anything. And I am happy to help with any parts of the SRU process :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864 Title: Flatpak related refs are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu 18.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1754864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1754864] Re: Flatpak related refs are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu 18.04
@Robert, will you be generating a debdiff for the gnome-3-28 branch when it's ready? (I see you are making other changes and I'm not familiar how you are taking the git repo and turning the changes into debian patches). Also I see that 3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.4 [0] is currently stuck [1] in bionic-proposed as bug 1756379 has not been verified. I guess that this should be done before pushing the next release through :-) 0 - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.4 1 - http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864 Title: Flatpak related refs are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu 18.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1754864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1754864] Re: Flatpak related refs are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu 18.04
The good news is that this now correctly installs themes when installing an app. Unfortunately for me test "2.4 Update an app in GNOME Software" from the flatpak test plan [0], fails for me with the package from proposed. After reverting to an older commit hash, then refreshing gnome-software it shows the update. But when I click "Update" the UI shows progress, hides the item and then it reappears again. Furthermore using the CLI you can see that the package hasn't been updated. So this change appears to be breaking an update. When running from the console I get "01:38:32:0760 Gs tried overwriting org.gnome.Recipes.desktop key flatpak::Commit from 6d5f7c35ff1f3fd449b2789324843a89140257bb3cdca468f83a65162b177fa0 to 1ac37481845c65857a64e8c0680bae137b0b56faaf6f11f3f0d415a3205bc1c2" and if i run in verbose mode I get this https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/r8pWhpmcG7/ Note flipping back to 3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.4 it works again. Therefore I am going to have to mark this as verification-failed-bionic for now. $ apt-cache policy gnome-software-plugin-flatpak gnome-software-plugin-flatpak: Installed: 3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.5 Candidate: 3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.5 Version table: *** 3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.5 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-proposed/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.4 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/universe amd64 Packages 3.28.1-0ubuntu4 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/universe amd64 Packages 0 - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/flatpak ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-failed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864 Title: Flatpak related refs are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu 18.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1754864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1794875] Re: [SRU] Autopkgtests fail with flatpak 1.0.X, due to missing -y in test scripts
Please reject the existing upload, while testing and going through upstream commits I noticed that I had missed another instance of -y fixes (https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak- builder/commit/247525a8002557d99878373aea931f969a59030e). This will be re-submitted in a subsequent upload. (sorry for the noise). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794875 Title: [SRU] Autopkgtests fail with flatpak 1.0.X, due to missing -y in test scripts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak-builder/+bug/1794875/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1778782] Re: [SRU] New upstream release ostree 2018.8
I have run the (flatpak) test plan on a Bionic VM, which passed all relevant tests successfully - I have noted the version of ostree used below. I have done exploratory testing of the ostree CLI and all autopkgtests are passing. Therefore I am marking this as verification- done-bionic. $ apt-cache policy ostree ostree: Installed: 2018.8-0ubuntu0.1 Candidate: 2018.8-0ubuntu0.1 Version table: *** 2018.8-0ubuntu0.1 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-proposed/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2018.4-2 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/universe amd64 Packages ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778782 Title: [SRU] New upstream release ostree 2018.8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ostree/+bug/1778782/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1787917] Re: New upstream release flatpak 1.0
I have run the test plan on a Bionic VM, which passed all relevant tests successfully - I have noted the version of flatpak used below. Autopkgtest's for flatpak itself are passing. Therefore I am marking this as verification-done-bionic. The autopkgtest's for flatpak-builder are failing against this flatpak version due to the issues described in bug 1794875, once the SRU in that bug is approved this should resolve the autopkgtest failures. Please correct me if I should not be setting verification as done here, as there are autopkgtest failures in related packages. $ apt-cache policy flatpak flatpak: Installed: 1.0.1-0ubuntu0.1 Candidate: 1.0.1-0ubuntu0.1 Version table: *** 1.0.1-0ubuntu0.1 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-proposed/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 0.11.7-0ubuntu0.1 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/universe amd64 Packages 0.11.3-3 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/universe amd64 Packages ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1787917 Title: New upstream release flatpak 1.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1787917/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1794875] Re: [SRU] Autopkgtests fail with flatpak 1.0.X, due to missing -y in test scripts
FYI the upload was rejected and a new one has been submitted, so the one in the queue is now the correct one to review. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794875 Title: [SRU] Autopkgtests fail with flatpak 1.0.X, due to missing -y in test scripts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak-builder/+bug/1794875/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1794875] Re: [SRU] Autopkgtests fail with flatpak 1.0.X, due to missing -y in test scripts
I see the latest upload was rejected, but I cannot find any reasoning anywhere (must be looking in the wrong places). Can someone point to the reason why this was rejected ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794875 Title: [SRU] Autopkgtests fail with flatpak 1.0.X, due to missing -y in test scripts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak-builder/+bug/1794875/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1794875] Re: [SRU] Autopkgtests fail with flatpak 1.0.X, due to missing -y in test scripts
@sil2100, Thanks, yeah Ken messaged me and we realised the message was only sent to the uploader. Sorry for not noticing the typo, I'll note to double check this in the future :-) I have run the autopkgtests on a bionic VM, which passed successfully. I have done exploratory testing of the flatpak-builder CLI. And autopkgtests in CI are now passing [3] [4]. Therefore I am marking this as verification-done-bionic. 3 - http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/flatpak-builder 4 - http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/flatpak-builder/bionic/amd64 ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794875 Title: [SRU] Autopkgtests fail with flatpak 1.0.X, due to missing -y in test scripts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak-builder/+bug/1794875/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1801814] Re: Environment overwrites XDG_DATA_DIRS
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. The .config/environment.d docs [0] and some info around gdm/env.d [1] don't seem to be too clear which order they would be loaded. But I would expect that the system gdm is loaded first then the local user one. So it seems strange that your local environment.d doesn't override. The flatpak.env file is located here [2] upstream, I would report a bug upstream [3] as they may have more ideas as to how to resolve this issue. Also providing your local configuration file in .config/environment.d may be useful. Testing this myself, if i run "/usr/lib/systemd/user-environment-generators/30-systemd-environment-d-generator" it shows the correct override of XDG_DATA_DIRS, but "systemctl --user show-environment" doesn't show XDG_DATA_DIRS being overridden - however it does show additional env vars. So it could be something odd happening in systemd ? I'm unsure if this is specifically a flatpak bug yet, lets see what upstream and others say. 0 - https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/environment.d.html 1 - https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/Wayland/SessionStart#Environment_variables 2 - https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/blob/master/env.d/flatpak.env.in 3 - https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1801814 Title: Environment overwrites XDG_DATA_DIRS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1801814/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1801814] Re: Environment overwrites XDG_DATA_DIRS
I also wonder if /etc/profile.d/ are having an affect, as in there I have flatpak.sh and xdg_dirs_desktop_session.sh. [4] mentions how the order of loading these was incorrect at one point in time for Debian and GNOME systems (but this was for PATH which is more of a special case). Also I'm not super familiar with the sequence of how these are loaded, so might be wrong :-) 4 - https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/6414 ** Bug watch added: github.com/systemd/systemd/issues #6414 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/6414 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1801814 Title: Environment overwrites XDG_DATA_DIRS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1801814/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1801814] Re: Environment overwrites XDG_DATA_DIRS
Thanks for investigating further, yes [0] seems to be the issue upstream. I'll keep an eye on the pull request/issue and hopefully it will land into a release that can be SRU'd :-) 0 - https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/25 ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1801814 Title: Environment overwrites XDG_DATA_DIRS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1801814/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1791553] Re: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed
(For anyone following this bug, the second merge request for the ubuntu-3-30 branch landed, so this just needs the ubuntu-3-30 code to be pushed into the cosmic). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791553 Title: Update preferences is not shown when flatpak plugin is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1791553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1793473] Re: Even on KDE flatpak wants to install xdg-desktop-portal-gtk
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This doesn't seem correct to me either, from my understanding of xdg-desktop-portal. It looks like xdg-desktop-portal-kde potentially should have the following (which xdg-desktop-portal-gtk already has). Provides: xdg-desktop-portal-backend, Therefore I am going to subscribe xdg-desktop-portal-kde to this bug. As Ubuntu imports these packages from Debian I would like it to be fixed there first, I will contact the maintainers of the package and ask for their advice. ** Also affects: xdg-desktop-portal-kde (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1793473 Title: Even on KDE flatpak wants to install xdg-desktop-portal-gtk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1793473/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1793473] Re: Even on KDE flatpak wants to install xdg-desktop-portal-gtk
@hjd, Thanks for pointing this out, I hadn't spotted this. Upstream have added the change here [0], I'll take a look at making an SRU for this change when I get a moment (if no one else wants to). And if there is a release of xdg-desktop-portal-kde soon (before the cosmic release) with the change, I'll request a sync to cosmic (again if no one else does). To add further detail the original problem, with this change it would allow one to easily select xdg-desktop-portal-kde without -gtk being installed. But as more interfaces are being added to xdg-desktop-portal, any that are missing from the -kde portal will fallback to using the -gtk one (if the -gtk one is installed) - as it is effectively the reference implementation. So while xdg-desktop-portal is still being developed at a "fast" pace it might be advisable to keep -gtk installed until both implementations have all the interfaces. 0 - https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/kde/xdg-desktop-portal-kde/commit/85ceb42c31784be7b3a57d2032a37be4441375b2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1793473 Title: Even on KDE flatpak wants to install xdg-desktop-portal-gtk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1793473/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1722576] Re: Typo in the description of xdg-desktop-portal-kde
Note that this has been fixed upstream in [0], when the next xdg- desktop-portal-kde release is made upstream and is then imported into Ubuntu this should be fixed. 0 - https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/kde/xdg-desktop-portal- kde/commit/e4c6f933c3acf8be2ac1aa63f2e1811765d301c6 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1722576 Title: Typo in the description of xdg-desktop-portal-kde To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-desktop-portal-kde/+bug/1722576/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1793473] Re: Even on KDE flatpak wants to install xdg-desktop-portal-gtk
As this affects xdg-desktop-portal-kde, I'm going to mark flatpak as invalid. ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1793473 Title: Even on KDE flatpak wants to install xdg-desktop-portal-gtk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1793473/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1774560] Re: xdg-desktop-portal-gtk malfunctions on Wayland: wl_display@1.error(zxdg_imported_v1@36, 0, "set_parent_of was called with an invalid child")
Is this a bug in mutter that has been fixed ? As I'm wondering why this bug is still open for xdg-desktop-portal-gtk and if it can be closed ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774560 Title: xdg-desktop-portal-gtk malfunctions on Wayland: wl_display@1.error(zxdg_imported_v1@36, 0, "set_parent_of was called with an invalid child") To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1774560/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1754864] Re: Flatpak runtime extensions are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu
@Asciiwolf, Personally I would prefer such a large change (229 additions and 37 deletions across 28 files) to be approved by upstream - especially as this is going into a LTS release. As it is not always clear what other behaviour this may change or break. I understand that this is the patch that Endless are using in their distro, but I would need to understand how the flatpak plugin works before I would be able to make a decision. Ultimately to get this change into Ubuntu it would need to be approved by Robert Ancell, so maybe Robert is the one who can advise if we should require upstream approval or if it is OK to distro patch. As this is quite an important fix for trying to use flatpak with a GUI in bionic. I am happy to help with the SRU process and submitting the patches to the Ubuntu gnome-software git etc, I just feel I don't have enough knowledge of gnome-software's code to state if this is an OK change to carry. (... or maybe we just need to wait until gnome-software is a flatpak/snap/appimage ;-) then we can magically get 3.30 :-) ) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864 Title: Flatpak runtime extensions are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1754864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1754864] Re: Flatpak runtime extensions are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu
(Also if this does get submitted I have a test plan for flatpak itself that includes UI tests for gnome-software, so this would help in doing the QA part) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864 Title: Flatpak runtime extensions are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1754864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1767217] Re: New upstream microrelease flatpak-builder 0.10.10
I'm going to close this placeholder bug, as there even newer releases. Also because the deb is less important now, as flatpak-builder itself is also a flatpak now - like how snapcraft is a snap. Maybe later I'll open a new bug to update to 1.0.X. ** Changed in: flatpak-builder (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767217 Title: New upstream microrelease flatpak-builder 0.10.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak-builder/+bug/1767217/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1787917] Re: New upstream release flatpak 1.0
flatpak-builder is failing autopkgtest's with flatpak 1.0, I believe this is because some of the tests are using the CLI interface which now has some additional questions. I'll create a debdiff for flatpak-builder with the patches from upstream which fix the tests so that they work with flatpak 1.0 and link the bug that I report here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1787917 Title: New upstream release flatpak 1.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1787917/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1794875] [NEW] [SRU] Autopkgtests fail with flatpak 1.0.X, due to missing -y in test scripts
Public bug reported:
New versions of flatpak have extra prompts in the CLI when performing
certain actions. Flatpak-builder has some tests which call directly to
the flatpak CLI, with new flatpak versions these tests fail - as shown
here [0].
Upstream these tests have been fixed with these commits [1] [2] which
simply adds "-y" to the relevant parts of the test scripts.
[Impact]
This bug does not affect users, it is about fixing autopkgtest failures
of flatpak-builder 0.10.9-1 being run against flatpak 1.0.1-0ubuntu0.1
(for the SRU bug 1787917).
Without this fix autopkgtests will fail, blocking the flatpak update.
[Test Case]
The test case is that before the autopkgtests would fail against flatpak
1.0.1-0ubuntu0.1, as seen here [0], but with this change these
autopkgtests should pass.
[Regression Potential]
Regression potential is low, as this change is simply adjusting the test
scripts using upstream changes.
I have tested that "$ gnome-desktop-testing-running flatpak-builder",
fails before and passes after this change.
[Other Info]
This should be submitted with bug 1787917 and is to fix the autopkgtest
tests that change.
0 -
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-bionic/bionic/amd64/f/flatpak-builder/20180927_115654_e352b@/log.gz
1 -
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/flatpak-builder/commit/582c1b5708735a057a33be78e447f891faff3369
2 -
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/flatpak-builder/commit/6d9f874c12ea3e742f15fe014138884da9130e08
** Affects: flatpak-builder (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: flatpak-builder (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen)
** Changed in: flatpak-builder (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Summary changed:
- [SRU] Autopkgtests fail with new flatpak versions, due to missing -y in test
scripts
+ [SRU] Autopkgtests fail with flatpak 1.0.X, due to missing -y in test scripts
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794875
Title:
[SRU] Autopkgtests fail with flatpak 1.0.X, due to missing -y in test
scripts
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak-builder/+bug/1794875/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1787917] Re: New upstream release flatpak 1.0
The autopkgtest fixes for flatpak-builder have been submitted in bug 1794875, if these are accepted into bionic-proposed they should solve the failures. (I have tested that the tests were fixed in a VM) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1787917 Title: New upstream release flatpak 1.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1787917/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821811] Re: New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.8
Is there anything else I need to do to help this update ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821811 Title: New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1821811/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1863383] Re: [eoan] New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.4.4
** Description changed: - Placeholder for flatpak 1.4.4 SRU in eoan. + This is a request to SRU the latest release of flatpak into eoan. + + [Impact] + + New upstream release of flatpak, which brings fixes and improvements. + + Eoan is currently at 1.4.3, whereas 1.4.4 is available upstream. + + [Test Case] + + The bugs being resolved are not simple to reproduce, see the test plan + below for testing flatpak itself. + + [Regression Potential] + + Flatpak has a test suite, which is run on build across all architectures + and passes. + + There is also a manual test plan + https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/flatpak. I have + confirmed that 1.4.4 passes with this test plan on both bionic and + cosmic. + + Flatpak has autopkgtests enabled + http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/flatpak which is passing on + eoan. + + Regression potential is low, and upstream is very responsive to any + issues raised. ** Summary changed: - [eoan] New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.4.4 + [SRU] [eoan] New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.4.4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863383 Title: [SRU] [eoan] New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.4.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1863383/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821811] [NEW] New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.X
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Placeholder for a future flatpak 1.0.X release for bionic and cosmic. ** Affects: flatpak (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen) ** Information type changed from Public to Public Security ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821811 Title: New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.X To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1821811/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1822024] Re: Sync flatpak 1.2.3-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) for CVE-2019-10063
If possible please sync 1.2.4-1 as this is the new upstream microrelease with other fixes as well :-) Also note I am preparing the fix (1.0.8) for bionic and cosmic in bug 1821811, I plan to be submitting this later today. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1822024 Title: Sync flatpak 1.2.3-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) for CVE-2019-10063 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1822024/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821811] Re: New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.X
** Attachment added: "Flatpak cosmic 1.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.10.1 to 1.0.8-0ubuntu0.18.10.1 debdiff.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1821811/+attachment/5250334/+files/flatpak_1.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.10.1_to_flatpak_1.0.8-0ubuntu0.18.10.1.debdiff.gz ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821811 Title: New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.X To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1821811/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821811] Re: New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.X
** Description changed: - Placeholder for a future flatpak 1.0.X release for bionic and cosmic. + This is a request to SRU the latest microrelease of flatpak into bionic + and cosmic. Which is also a security update for CVE-2019-10063. + + Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925541 + Upstream bug https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/2782 + + [Impact] + + New upstream microrelease of flatpak, which brings a security fix for + CVE-2019-10063. + + Bionic is currently at 1.0.7, whereas 1.0.8 is available upstream. + Cosmic is currently at 1.0.7, whereas 1.0.8 is available upstream. + + Disco needs to be synced to >= 1.2.3-2 (is someone able to sync 1.2.4-1 + from unstable ? ) bug 1822024 has this request. + + [Test Case] + + No test case has been mentioned in the Debian bug, in the upstream pull + request it looks like the snapd exploit might be able to be used + https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46594 but the code change is minimal + so I have not tried this yet. + + [Regression Potential] + + Flatpak has a test suite, which is run on build across all architectures + and passes. + + There is also a manual test plan + https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/flatpak. I have + confirmed that 1.0.8 passes with this test plan on both bionic and + cosmic. + + Flatpak has autopkgtests enabled + http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/flatpak which is passing on + bionic and cosmic. + + Regression potential is low, and upstream is very responsive to any + issues raised. + + [Other information] + + Debian and upstream comments about the vulnerability. + + "flatpak versions since 0.8.1 (and Debian's 0.8.0-2, which has backports + of the upstream changes that became 0.8.1) attempt to prevent malicious + apps from escalating their privileges by injecting commands into the + controlling terminal with the TIOCSTI ioctl (CVE-2017-5226). + + This fix was incomplete: on 64-bit platforms, seccomp looks at the whole + 64-bit word, but the kernel only looks at the low 32 bits. This means we + also have to block commands like (0x12345678 | TIOCSTI). + CVE-2019-10063 has been allocated for this vulnerability, which closely + resembles CVE-2019-7303 in snapd. + + Mitigation: as usual with Flatpak sandbox bypasses, this can only be + exploited if you install a malicious app from a trusted source. The + sandbox parameters used for most apps are currently sufficiently weak + that a malicious app could do other equally bad things that we cannot + prevent, for example by abusing the X11 protocol." + + Debian security tracker https://security- + tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-10063 ** Attachment added: "Flatpak bionic 1.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 to 1.0.8-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 debdiff.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1821811/+attachment/5250333/+files/flatpak_1.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.1_to_flatpak_1.0.8-0ubuntu0.18.04.1.debdiff.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821811 Title: New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.X To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1821811/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821811] Re: New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.8
This has been fixed in disco as per version 1.2.4-1. Is someone able to nominate this bug for bionic and cosmic, and mark the main bug as fixed released. (I don't have permission to nominate for series) ** Summary changed: - New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.X + New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.8 ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2019-10063 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821811 Title: New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1821811/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821811] Re: New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.8
Hi,
I used pull-lp-source flatpak {bionic,cosmic}, then uscan --download-
version 1.0.8 and uupdate, as there is a new upstream release with this
fix.
For bionic these are the sha256sum's in my build folder
85e9f11188fde70fa6c4b1e17b1bc61d1ea5abf9fe4e0d956c3f421deaace4da
flatpak_1.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.1.debian.tar.xz
e0e6626a6d475ab263e7eab93d945d88f37c055fc9083d349101829b61253590
flatpak_1.0.7.orig.tar.xz
f8e3f7ea885a95ab46684a3ae5d2b7f5bcebc120d2819468a3e08d14b5aef226
flatpak_1.0.8-0ubuntu0.18.04.1.debian.tar.xz
1b1b419e3b2e8e75b18eb6442f0eb585fe402cea529729c15bbaf2622d746c3c
flatpak_1.0.8.orig.tar.xz
1b1b419e3b2e8e75b18eb6442f0eb585fe402cea529729c15bbaf2622d746c3c
flatpak-1.0.8.tar.xz
For cosmic these are the sha256sum's in my build folder
d6634d222d6175e5aeba6e5b1ca2be61cfe3b02afe79dc390feac09e56efb673
flatpak_1.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.10.1.debian.tar.xz
e0e6626a6d475ab263e7eab93d945d88f37c055fc9083d349101829b61253590
flatpak_1.0.7.orig.tar.xz
b29bfb4b530d4c3d48d2024a40b698a33b072b2dec619364701d51cba106d51b
flatpak_1.0.8-0ubuntu0.18.10.1.debian.tar.xz
1b1b419e3b2e8e75b18eb6442f0eb585fe402cea529729c15bbaf2622d746c3c
flatpak_1.0.8.orig.tar.xz
1b1b419e3b2e8e75b18eb6442f0eb585fe402cea529729c15bbaf2622d746c3c
flatpak-1.0.8.tar.xz
Let me know if you need more info :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821811
Title:
New upstream microrelease flatpak 1.0.8
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1821811/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1823054] Re: xdg-desktop-portal-gtk can't be installed due to missing dependency in Xenial
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. I believe this is due to bug 1817285 not being completed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1823054 Title: xdg-desktop-portal-gtk can't be installed due to missing dependency in Xenial To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-desktop-portal-gtk/+bug/1823054/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1817285] Re: SRU xdg-desktop-portal 1.0.3
FYI this not landing yet in xenial is preventing xdg-desktop-portal-gtk from being installed in xenial (see bug 1823054) as xenial doesn't have >= 0.10 of xdg-desktop-portal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1817285 Title: SRU xdg-desktop-portal 1.0.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-desktop-portal/+bug/1817285/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1806220] Re: [SRU] New upstream release flatpak 1.0.6
Thanks ! I have run the test plan on a Cosmic VM, which passed all relevant tests successfully - I have noted the version of flatpak used below. Autopkgtest's are also passing. Therefore I am making this as verification-done-cosmic. $ apt-cache policy flatpak flatpak: Installed: 1.0.6-0ubuntu1.1 Candidate: 1.0.6-0ubuntu1.1 Version table: *** 1.0.6-0ubuntu1.1 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic-proposed/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1.0.4-1 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic/universe amd64 Packages ** Tags removed: verification-needed-cosmic ** Tags added: verification-done-cosmic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1806220 Title: [SRU] New upstream release flatpak 1.0.6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1806220/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1806220] Re: [SRU] New upstream release flatpak 1.0.6
Thanks ! I have run the test plan on a Bionic VM, which passed all relevant tests successfully - I have noted the version of flatpak used below. Autopkgtest's are also passing. Therefore I am marking this as verification-done-bionic. $ apt-cache policy flatpak flatpak: Installed: 1.0.6-0ubuntu0.1 Candidate: 1.0.6-0ubuntu0.1 Version table: *** 1.0.6-0ubuntu0.1 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-proposed/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1.0.1-0ubuntu0.1 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/universe amd64 Packages 0.11.3-3 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/universe amd64 Packages ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1806220 Title: [SRU] New upstream release flatpak 1.0.6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1806220/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1862158] Re: gnome-software tries to install snap updates in the background, causing unprompted polkit authentication for authorisation to install packages
I believe this issue is because we now show pending snap updates in gnome-software (useful when one has manually set the refresh timer), which causes them to be categorised as "updatable live". gnome-software then has an update monitor that automatically tries to apply any updatable live apps (which causes the polkit dialogs and updates complete notifications) - but we don't want this as snapd does this. I have an untested patch here https://gitlab.gnome.org/ahayzen/gnome- software/commit/0597be6f317a38aa64ac86280d7b05a1aa242a70 which I believe should disable snap app updates from the update monitor. If it looks good let me know and I can proposed it against gnome- software master :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862158 Title: gnome-software tries to install snap updates in the background, causing unprompted polkit authentication for authorisation to install packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1862158/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1870241] [NEW] Sync flatpak 1.6.3-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync flatpak 1.6.3-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current focal version 1.6.2-1: flatpak (1.6.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream stable release -- Simon McVittie Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:56:06 +0100 ** Affects: flatpak (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870241 Title: Sync flatpak 1.6.3-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1870241/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1870241] Re: Sync flatpak 1.6.3-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Note that syncing flatpak 1.6.3-1 should solve the autopkgtests for ostree that is currently stuck in focal-proposed (ostree 2020.3-1 is failing with flatpak 1.6.2-1). So this would help ostree migrate :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870241 Title: Sync flatpak 1.6.3-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1870241/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1595288] Re: Music App crashes when starts
>From that specific error message, it appears that media-hub does not exist. This is also now the second time I have heard an issue about starting the music-app after using bluetooth headphones, there I'm going to add media-hub to this bug. ** Also affects: media-hub (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1595288 Title: Music App crashes when starts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/music-app/+bug/1595288/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1721049] Re: "Got unknown content type text/html" error viewing flatpack packages
** Tags added: flatpak-usability -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1721049 Title: "Got unknown content type text/html" error viewing flatpack packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1721049/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1762047] Re: System must be restarted for Flatpak apps to be listed in menu
** Tags added: flatpak-usability -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762047 Title: System must be restarted for Flatpak apps to be listed in menu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/flatpak/+bug/1762047/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1764680] Re: Can't install flatpaks on systems with brtfs/xfs
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. I tried using an Ubuntu 18.04 daily image with XFS and was able to successfully install org.gnome.Recipes with --system. Looking at the ostree package, it looks like 2018.4-2 was synced from Debian into bionic on 2018-04-18 [0]. Therefore I am going to mark this bug as fix released. 0 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ostree/2018.4-2 ** Tags added: flatpak-usability ** Changed in: ostree (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1764680 Title: Can't install flatpaks on systems with brtfs/xfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ostree/+bug/1764680/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1754864] Re: Flatpak runtime extensions are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu
** Tags added: flatpak-usability -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864 Title: Flatpak runtime extensions are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1754864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1767215] [NEW] New upstream microrelease flatpak 0.11.4
Public bug reported: There is a new flatpak release for the 0.11.X series which should be SRU'd into bionic. ** This is a placeholder for a future SRU request ** https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/flatpak/2018-April/001068.html https://salsa.debian.org/debian/flatpak/tree/debian/0.11.4-1 ** Affects: flatpak (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen) ** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767215 Title: New upstream microrelease flatpak 0.11.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1767215/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1767217] [NEW] New upstream microrelease flatpak-builder 0.10.10
Public bug reported: There is a new flatpak-builder release for the 0.10.X series which should be SRU'd into bionic. ** This is a placeholder for a future SRU request ** https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/flatpak/2018-April/001069.html https://salsa.debian.org/debian/flatpak-builder/tree/debian/0.10.10-1 ** Affects: flatpak-builder (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: flatpak-builder (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Hayzen (ahayzen) ** Changed in: flatpak-builder (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767217 Title: New upstream microrelease flatpak-builder 0.10.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak-builder/+bug/1767217/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1766137] Re: [regression] Password accepted but login fails (blank purple screen and mouse pointer only)
To add more info, the following steps cause this issue on my machine and are reproducible. - Start machine login to user A - Logout of user A - Try to login to user B - Now have a purple display, need to use the cancel workaround (next login will work) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766137 Title: [regression] Password accepted but login fails (blank purple screen and mouse pointer only) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gdm/+bug/1766137/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1767215] Re: New upstream microrelease flatpak 0.11.4
Found a potential regression in flatpak 0.11.4 using the test plan, reported https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/1627. Waiting to find out if it is an app issue or a flatpak regression. ** Bug watch added: github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues #1627 https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/1627 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767215 Title: New upstream microrelease flatpak 0.11.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1767215/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1767215] Re: New upstream microrelease flatpak 0.11.4
This regression has been resolved in flatpak 0.11.5, therefore updating and testing flatpak 0.11.5 now :-) https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/flatpak/2018-April/001074.html https://salsa.debian.org/debian/flatpak/tree/debian/0.11.5-1 ** Summary changed: - New upstream microrelease flatpak 0.11.4 + New upstream microrelease flatpak 0.11.5 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767215 Title: New upstream microrelease flatpak 0.11.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1767215/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1762047] Re: System must be restarted for Flatpak apps to be listed in menu
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This is a known issue and has been reported upstream - https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/1256 Please look at the upstream bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. ** Bug watch added: github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues #1256 https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/1256 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762047 Title: System must be restarted for Flatpak apps to be listed in menu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1762047/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1762047] Re: System must be restarted for Flatpak apps to be listed in menu
** Also affects: flatpak via https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/1256 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762047 Title: System must be restarted for Flatpak apps to be listed in menu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/flatpak/+bug/1762047/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
