Re: the size of Evolution
Jeff wrote: > Le samedi 19 avril 2008 à 13:21 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : >> That's mostly the images for the documentation. It ships the images for a >> lot of >> locales, as some of them are localized. > Hmm, at first I thought "well there's nothing to do then"... but why not > split this into evolution-doc-$locale packages, and have them only > installed by the good old language-support-$locale? That could be a good option to save a lot of space for Intrepid, indeed. As they aren't localized for every language, we could ship the English version by default. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
Re: the size of Evolution
Le samedi 19 avril 2008 à 13:21 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : > That's mostly the images for the documentation. It ships the images for a lot > of > locales, as some of them are localized. Hmm, at first I thought "well there's nothing to do then"... but why not split this into evolution-doc-$locale packages, and have them only installed by the good old language-support-$locale? -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
Re: the size of Evolution
And why aren't those in an evolution-doc package? On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jeff wrote: > > Hello folks, this is more of a culture/curiosity question that spawned > > while I was reading a thread in the forums... The evolution-common > > package in ubuntu weights 93.4 MiB. After openoffice.org-core, this is > > the heaviest package installed in ubuntu by default. I personally like > > evolution, and I'd like it to be kept part of the default installation, > > I was just wondering: what on earth can be so heavy in evolution-common? > > They certainly don't have over 8 million lines of codes like openoffice, > no? > > > > Anyone has a clue why this package is so heavy? Just curious, thanks! > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -L evolution-common | grep '\.png' | wc -l > 1370 > > That's mostly the images for the documentation. It ships the images for a > lot of > locales, as some of them are localized. > > Emilio > > > -- > ubuntu-desktop mailing list > ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop > > -- Bogdan Butnaru — [EMAIL PROTECTED] "I think I am a fallen star, I should wish on myself." – O. -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
Re: the size of Evolution
Jeff wrote: > Hello folks, this is more of a culture/curiosity question that spawned > while I was reading a thread in the forums... The evolution-common > package in ubuntu weights 93.4 MiB. After openoffice.org-core, this is > the heaviest package installed in ubuntu by default. I personally like > evolution, and I'd like it to be kept part of the default installation, > I was just wondering: what on earth can be so heavy in evolution-common? > They certainly don't have over 8 million lines of codes like openoffice, no? > > Anyone has a clue why this package is so heavy? Just curious, thanks! > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -L evolution-common | grep '\.png' | wc -l 1370 That's mostly the images for the documentation. It ships the images for a lot of locales, as some of them are localized. Emilio signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
the size of Evolution
Hello folks, this is more of a culture/curiosity question that spawned while I was reading a thread in the forums... The evolution-common package in ubuntu weights 93.4 MiB. After openoffice.org-core, this is the heaviest package installed in ubuntu by default. I personally like evolution, and I'd like it to be kept part of the default installation, I was just wondering: what on earth can be so heavy in evolution-common? They certainly don't have over 8 million lines of codes like openoffice, no? Anyone has a clue why this package is so heavy? Just curious, thanks! -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
