Re: ari-tczew to be excluded from Ubuntu community

2011-04-06 Thread Artur Rona
Thanks for every person who helped me in development for Ubuntu project.
Work with you was a pleasure.

-- 
Pozdrawiam / Kind regards,
Artur Rona


-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: Natty test rebuild for amd64, armel, i386 (all components)

2011-04-02 Thread Artur Rona
Contributors like to use rebuild by Lucas Nussbaum [1] and his page is
often not up-to-dated. Anyway, people still use Lucas rebuilds even if
it is outdated. So generic link would be useful. Would be nice to get an
opinion from other people. However, I am afraid that not every Ubuntu
developer is subscribed here.
[1] http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu_ftbfs.cgi

-- 
Pozdrawiam / Kind regards,
Artur Rona


-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: Natty test rebuild for amd64, armel, i386 (all components)

2011-04-02 Thread Artur Rona
Is it possible to create a special URL which leads to current fresh
archive rebuild? I imagine it as e.g.
http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/test-rebuild-devel/
There should be index.php which redirects to current rebuild, e.g. at
this moment it could be redirect to
http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test/test-rebuild-20110329-natty.html
This way permanent link gives contributor a facilitation. It needs only
updating link to destination URL in index.php.

What do you think?

Dnia 2011-03-30, śro o godzinie 07:34 +0200, Matthias Klose pisze:
> Another natty test rebuild for amd64, armel and i386  was started yesterday,
> including all components.  Packages in the main component will build first. 
> The
> test archives are:
> 
>   https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20110329/
>   https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20110329-arm
> 
> Build failures are tracked in
> 
> 
> http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test/test-rebuild-20110329-natty.html
> 
> http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test/test-rebuild-20110329-arm-natty.html
> 
> The status pages are updated hourly. The rebuilds are expected to complete
> sometime next week for amd64 and i386.
> 
>   Matthias
> 

-- 
Pozdrawiam / Kind regards,
Artur Rona


-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: Please do not use syncpackage during hard-freeze periods

2011-04-02 Thread Artur Rona
I appreciate your addition time spent. However, I was not a requester,
just sponsor, so not me should be signed to uploaded package. Do not
make bureaucracy and these cases will not be appear in future anymore.

Why universe is hard-frozen as well?

-- 
Pozdrawiam / Kind regards,
Artur Rona


-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: Please do not use syncpackage during hard-freeze periods

2011-03-29 Thread Artur Rona
What kind of problem do you have with accepting packages based on
syncpackage? Do you need a bug for see explanation why it should be
synced? It is, in file *_source.changes which is uploaded every time on
ftp via dput. There is a line called 'Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed' where you
can find a bug number which is leading to request of sync.

Dnia 2011-03-26, sob o godzinie 10:39 +, Colin Watson pisze:
> During hard-freeze periods (such as the current beta freeze) all uploads
> to the queue must have an easily-found rationale (preferably in the
> changelog or a linked bug) in order to be accepted.  syncpackage does
> not permit this, because all we get in the queue is the changelog
> written by the Debian maintainer, which doesn't typically explain why
> the changes matter for the Ubuntu 11.04 beta-1 release.
> 
> I have rejected three uploads made using syncpackage:
> 
>   aview
>   bbrun
>   papaya
> 
> If these need to be in the 11.04 beta-1 release, please file sync
> request bugs using requestsync, and include an appropriate rationale.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> -- 
> Colin Watson   [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
> 

-- 
Pozdrawiam / Kind regards,
Artur Rona


-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: multiarch library support in Natty and Oneiric

2011-03-22 Thread Artur Rona
Hello,

I am 99% sure, but I want to get this missing 1% and ask: while merging
package which has got multiarch support in delta, is it forward-able to
Debian?

-- 
Pozdrawiam / Kind regards,
Artur Rona


-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: Merge-o-Matic is broken

2011-03-21 Thread Artur Rona
Dnia 2011-03-16, śro o godzinie 01:31 +, Colin Watson pisze:
> This was caused by a combination of a dpkg change that needed to be
> backported to hardy (which the merges.ubuntu.com host currently runs)
> and eventually the host running out of disk space (which tends to happen
> after it's been failing for a while, because the amount of temporary
> space it uses is proportional to the size of the update it needs to
> perform).  And then, slightly embarrassingly, I forgot to turn the cron
> jobs back on after making sure it was working properly.
> 
> It's all fixed now.
> 
> > Is it going to be removed?
> 
> Please don't infer such things from temporary failures.  There are no
> plans to remove or disable merges.ubuntu.com.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -- 
> Colin Watson   [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
> 

Yes, now looks good.
Thanks!

-- 
Pozdrawiam / Kind regards,
Artur Rona


-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: Merge-o-Matic is broken

2011-03-04 Thread Artur Rona
I know about Lucas merges and I use it when Merge-o-Matic does not work
properly. However, MoM is more useful because it has semi-automatic
script to doing merges automatically and has got comments module.

Dnia 2011-03-04, pią o godzinie 19:00 +0100, Fabrice Coutadeur pisze:
> Hi Artur,
> 
> Do you know this merge page: http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~lucas/merges.html ?
> I've been using it instead of MoM since Lucas put it online (last
> year, I think), and seems to be always up-to-date.


-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Merge-o-Matic is broken

2011-03-04 Thread Artur Rona
Dear developers,

Since some time (probably 15th Feb) Merge-o-Matic has been hanged and
did not update database anymore. Now it looks like turned off - Internal
Server Error. What is the status of MoM? Is it going to be removed?
I would like to notice that Merge-o-Matic is helpful tool for
contributors. It is useful during FeatureFreeze cause contributors and
developers can easy look for bug-fixes and security-fixes in Debian and
do merge or request sync.
https://merges.ubuntu.com/

Kind regards,
Artur Rona


-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: Patch pilot report

2011-03-02 Thread Artur Rona
Practically 14, because there is one entry which should not exist
anymore. I can not remove it from sponsors overview.
2011-02-01  lp:~legolas/ubuntu/natty/php5/5.3.5 5.3.5   php5
core
branchesari-tczew   1 comments, (Disapprove)main
2011-02-01


-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: build-from-branch into the primary archive

2011-02-21 Thread Artur Rona
Quickly and shortly due to out of time:
I do not see a reason to deal with branches lp:ubuntu/$package if I need
to upload source via dput, as well. It does not makes sense -
duplicating a work. If Bazaar can create a source from my uploaded
branch without dput, then it is fine.
Summarizing, I am waiting for modern Bazaar.


-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Get upgrades first before Feature Freeze

2011-02-20 Thread Artur Rona
Dear patch pilots and developers,

Since we are a few days before Feature Freeze and in sponsors queue
upgrade packages are waiting, I would like to ask you for get upgrades
and merges first. Bug fixes are easy to go while Feature Freeze, if we
will not manage get them before 24th February.

Kind regards,
Artur Rona


-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel