Re: [utah-devel] UTAH Weekly Meeting
On 09/20/2012 09:37 AM, Brad Figg wrote: On 09/20/2012 09:07 AM, Gema Gomez wrote: On 20/09/12 17:04, Brad Figg wrote: On 09/20/2012 08:58 AM, Gema Gomez wrote: [...] Before you run UDS sessions, your documentation should be good enough that a person doesn't need to attend a session. I've discussed this with Max a bit. Indeed that's part of the improvements we will be trying to make. Any specific feedback you have on what's missing would be useful to help us improve it.. after so many conversations on how the tool works and what the main concepts are, we have lost sight of things that may be obviously missing for end users. One thing Max mentioned in the meeting and I forgot to add, is that we should not assume any QA background on the people using the tool, so all concepts should be clearly explained. Any other thing you can think off, specifically, that would make your life easier? Gema 1. It would be really helpful to have the equivalent of hello world. A step by step: . Create directory x here. . in directory x create file y . create directory y . etc. 2. Document the purpose of every configuration file. 3. Document every attribute of every configuration file. For example: . fetch_cmd - what is it, is it required, why is it required. . runlist - same questions plus, it has list in its name so how do i specify a list? 4. Show an example (hello world) on how to run the tests locally without needing to do provisioning. 5. Don't use terms/adjectives like Cool (it just doesn't sound professional) These all seem like obvious things to document. Brad And get the documentation onto a ubuntu.com website. I know it's a pita to deal with IS on these things but you are going to get nothing but grief from people if you don't. It's best to just nip that in the bud. -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- Ubuntu-utah-devel mailing list Ubuntu-utah-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-utah-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2011-10-04
://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/860832|Natty Tracking Bug]] * In Verification Current Kernel versions are available here: http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/versions.html === Open Discussion or Questions === Welcome aboard jsalisbury -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Testing in Ubuntu BoF at UDS: 7pm on Wednesday
On 10/04/2011 09:59 AM, Evan Dandrea wrote: Following all the excitement around better integrating automated testing into our development process, we're holding the first-ever Testing in Ubuntu Birds of a Feather session at UDS-P. It will take place at 7pm on Wednesday night. Pizza and drinks will be provided. We're looking for volunteers to give 5 minute lightning talks on cool things they've come across, created, or big ideas they have, as they relate to automated testing. It doesn't have to be Ubuntu-specific, but please pick a topic that would be helpful to those developing Ubuntu infrastructure. Please sign up here, if you're interested: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UDS-P/TestingInUbuntu Even, I think this is a great idea. However, I'd like to see it done during the day. I think testing is important enough it shouldn't be relegated to an after hours event. Personally, I'd like to see more BoFs at UDS. Brad -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: TB Election September 2011
On 09/29/2011 08:55 AM, Daniel Holbach wrote: Hello, Am 23.09.2011 15:41, schrieb Daniel Holbach: The poll ends 2011-09-30 13:00 UTC. Just a heads-up: There is less than a day left to vote. Have a great day, Daniel Daniel, I've dug around for mine and can't find it. Please send me a new url. Thanks, Brad -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2011-09-27
|Detailed Information Here]] Kernel status for each series is as follows: = Hardy = * [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/853945|Hardy Tracking Bug]] * Currently undergoing regression testing = Lucid = * [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/849228|Lucid Tracking Bug]] * Awaiting publishing to -updates and -security = Maverick = * [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/854092|Maverick Tracking Bug]] * In testing Phase. Undergoing regression testing, needs Certification testing = Natty = * In preparation, should be in Verification phase by the end of this week Current Kernel versions are available here: http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/versions.html === Open Discussion or Questions === Nothing this week -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2011-09-13
a dissapointing number of failures to verify fixes in the last cycle, resulting in reverting a large number of fixes which are probably of high value. BR BR SRU kernel status: * [[http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/sru-report.html|Detailed Information Here]] BR BR Kernel status for each series is as follows: Hardy * Released Lucid * [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/836914|Lucid Tracking Bug]] * Now building in the PPA, will enter Testing phase when complete and copied to -proposed * The following fixes were reverted due to a failure to be verified: [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/509180|ecryptfs sometimes seems to add trailing garbage to encrypted files]] [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/583760|Mouse cursor dissappears with nouveau]] * The following patch was reverted because it caused a regression: [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/836899|tunnels: fix netns vs proto registration ordering]] * The following patches will be reverted due to a regression: * 756de92 drm/i915: Remove BUG_ON from i915_gem_evict_something * 9b4fca6 drm/i915: Periodically flush the active lists and requests * 53e68e3 drm/i915/evict: Ensure we completely cleanup on failure * 38c2e45 drm/i915: Maintain LRU order of inactive objects upon access by CPU (v2) * 5ef2204 drm/i915: Implement fair lru eviction across both rings. (v2) * 3e69bf2 drm/i915: Move the eviction logic to its own file. * 1126f22 drm/i915: prepare for fair lru eviction These are being tracked in this bug: [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/849130|Revert various i915 patches]] Maverick * Released Natty * The following fixes were reverted due to a failure to be verified: [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/509180|ecryptfs sometimes seems to add trailing garbage to encrypted files]] [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/795717 32bit rhel and centos 5.(56) hangs on boot on natty]] [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/728835|[ath9] kswapd0: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020]] * [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/848246|Natty Tracking Bug]] * Now in -proposed BR BR Current Kernel versions are available here: http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/versions.html === Open Discussion or Questions === Nothing new this week. -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2011-09-06
://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836914|Lucid Tracking Bug]] * Lucid kernel is on testing phase right now: security-sigoff is complete, QA and certification testing are in progress. Maverick * [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/837449|Maverick Tracking Bug]] * Maverick kernel is on testing phase right now: security-signoff is * complete, QA is waiting to be started, certification testing is in progress. Natty * [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836903|Natty Tracking Bug]] * Natty is on verification phase Current Kernel versions are available here: http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/versions.html === Open Discussion or Questions === Nothing new. -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2011-08-30
that we don't pile up more stable upstream patches than we must. This effectively decouples Natty from the kernel cadence for the other kernels BR * [[http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/sru-report.html|Detailed Information Here]] BR Hardy * Released Lucid * [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/836914|Lucid Tracking Bug]] * Now building in the PPA, will enter Testing phase when complete and copied to -proposed * The following fixes were reverted due to a failure to be verified: [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/509180||ecryptfs sometimes seems to add trailing garbage to encrypted files]] [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/583760||Mouse cursor dissappears with nouveau]] * The following patch was reverted because it caused a regression: [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/836899||tunnels: fix netns vs proto registration ordering]] Maverick * [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/837449|Maverick Tracking Bug]] * Now building in the PPA, will enter Testing phase when complete and copied to -proposed * The following fixes were reverted due to a failure to be verified: [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/509180||ecryptfs sometimes seems to add trailing garbage to encrypted files]] [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/583760||Mouse cursor dissappears with nouveau]] Natty * [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/836903|Natty Tracking Bug]] * Now building in the PPA, will enter Verification phase when complete and copied to -proposed BR BR Current Kernel versions are available here: http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/versions.html === Open Discussion or Questions: Raise your hand to be recognized === * I've made changes to some of the bug reports. * Bug Heat column added. * Kernel version column added. The kernel version will be prefixed with '[U]' or '[P]' if that is the version in -updates or -proposed. * http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/1-day-new.html -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process
On 08/02/2011 01:38 PM, Chase Douglas wrote: On 08/02/2011 01:26 PM, Brad Figg wrote: On 08/02/2011 01:12 PM, Dan Chen wrote: On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 16:04, Chase Douglaschase.doug...@canonical.com wrote: True, but progress sometimes means change. I think this system would work better, and if proven right it could be a model for other boards to adopt. If it's worse, then the DMB can easily switch back. I would also be happy to be a guinea pig for any process changes. I echo Chase's opinion in this regard; we should remain flexible in adapting our approval processes. The only thing I add is that we should be cognizant of building a timeout into the process using Launchpad so that applications don't spin indefinitely, e.g., the stale five-digit Launchpad bug report. Cheers, -Dan You could use the model the kernel team is using for tracking workflow for SRU kernels. We have a project set up and a set of custom series that are used for tracking the workflow. A bot runs at regular intervals sending out nags if necessary or changing the status of a workflow item as previous dependencies are met. That's interesting. How are custom bug series managed? I admin a few projects on LP, but I can't find any way of doing this. -- Chase You can just make up your own names. If you go to: https://launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow you can see them all. You just Register a series to add another. Note, when listed on a bug report as a task, the tasks are listed alphabetically. Brad -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2011-07-12
|| TiP || Verified || |||| || || || || || hardylinux || 2.6.24-29.91 || 2.6.24-29.92 ||0 ||0 || || lucidlinux-meta-lts-backport-maverick || 2.6.35.25.36 || 2.6.35.30.38 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-lts-backport-maverick || 2.6.35-25.44~lucid1 || 2.6.35-30.56~lucid1 || 22 || 22 || || --- linux-firmware|| 1.34.7 || 1.34.10 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux || 2.6.32-33.70 || 2.6.32-33.71 ||0 ||0 || || maverick linux-firmware|| 1.38.6 || 1.38.8 ||1 ||0 || || --- linux || 2.6.35-30.54 || 2.6.35-30.56 ||1 ||1 || || nattylinux-meta-ti-omap4 || || 2.6.38.1209.7||0 ||0 || || --- linux-backports-modules-2.6.38|| 2.6.38-10.6 || 2.6.38-11.7 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-firmware|| || 1.52.1 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux || 2.6.38-10.46 || 2.6.38-11.47 || 18 || 16 || || --- linux-ti-omap4|| || 2.6.38-1209.13 || 10 || 10 || || --- linux-meta|| 2.6.38.10.25 || 2.6.38.11.26 ||0 ||0 || === Open Discussion or Questions === * Nothing new this week -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2011-07-19
Information Here]] === Hardy === * [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/812360|Hardy Tracking Bug]] * A new kernel is in -proposed. Since this kernel contains only CVE fixes, there is no verification to be done, and it is ready for QA === Lucid === * Previous kernel has been released, but a new one has not been prepared yet === Maverick === * [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/808934|Maverick Tracking Bug]] * Kernel in -proposed from the last cycle is awaiting certification and regression testing. === Natty === * [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/811180|Natty Tracking Bug]] * Previous kernel has been released, and a new one is in -proposed. * Verification has begun for this kernel, and will continue through next week. === Security bugfix kernels - Maverick/Lucid/Hardy === Current Kernel versions are always available here: http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/versions.html || Package|| Upd/Sec || Proposed || TiP || Verified || |||| || || || || || hardylinux || 2.6.24-29.91 || 2.6.24-29.92 ||0 ||0 || || lucidlinux-meta-lts-backport-maverick || 2.6.35.25.36 || 2.6.35.30.38 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-lts-backport-maverick || 2.6.35-25.44~lucid1 || 2.6.35-30.56~lucid1 || 22 || 22 || || --- linux-firmware|| 1.34.7 || 1.34.10 ||0 ||0 || || maverick linux-firmware|| 1.38.6 || 1.38.8 ||1 ||0 || || --- linux || 2.6.35-30.54 || 2.6.35-30.56 ||1 ||1 || || nattylinux-meta-ti-omap4 || || 2.6.38.1209.7||0 ||0 || || --- linux-backports-modules-2.6.38|| 2.6.38-10.6 || 2.6.38-11.7 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-firmware|| || 1.52.1 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux || 2.6.38-10.46 || 2.6.38-11.47 || 18 ||5 || || --- linux-ti-omap4|| || 2.6.38-1209.13 || 10 || 10 || || --- linux-meta|| 2.6.38.10.25 || 2.6.38.11.26 ||0 ||0 || === Open Discussion or Questions === None -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2011-07-12
|| 2.6.32-32.62 || 2.6.32-33.70 ||4 ||4 || || --- linux-backports-modules-2.6.32|| 2.6.32-32.32 || 2.6.32-33.33 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-meta-ec2|| 2.6.32.316.17|| 2.6.32.317.18||0 ||0 || || maverick linux-mvl-dove|| 2.6.32-416.33|| 2.6.32-417.34||6 ||6 || || --- linux-meta-mvl-dove || 2.6.32.416.6 || 2.6.32.417.7 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-firmware|| 1.38.6 || 1.38.8 ||1 ||0 || || --- linux || 2.6.35-30.54 || 2.6.35-30.55 ||1 ||1 || || nattylinux-meta-ti-omap4 || || 2.6.38.1209.7||0 ||0 || || --- linux-backports-modules-2.6.38|| || 2.6.38-10.6 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-firmware|| || 1.52.1 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux || || 2.6.38-10.46 || 15 || 15 || || --- linux-ti-omap4|| || 2.6.38-1209.13 || 10 || 10 || || --- linux-meta|| || 2.6.38.10.25 ||0 ||0 || === Open Discussion or Questions: Raise your hand to be recognized === For your amusement: http://people.canonical.com/~bradf/ -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2011-07-05
|| 2.6.35.30.38 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-lts-backport-maverick || 2.6.35-25.44~lucid1 || 2.6.35-30.54~lucid1 || 21 || 21 || || --- linux-meta|| 2.6.32.32.38 || 2.6.32.33.39 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-firmware|| 1.34.7 || 1.34.10 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux || 2.6.32-32.62 || 2.6.32-33.69 ||3 ||3 || || --- linux-backports-modules-2.6.32|| 2.6.32-32.32 || 2.6.32-33.33 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-meta-ec2|| 2.6.32.316.17|| 2.6.32.317.18||0 ||0 || || maverick linux-mvl-dove|| 2.6.32-416.33|| 2.6.32-417.34||6 ||6 || || --- linux-meta-mvl-dove || 2.6.32.416.6 || 2.6.32.417.7 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-firmware|| 1.38.6 || 1.38.8 ||1 ||0 || || --- linux || 2.6.35-30.54 || 2.6.35-30.55 ||2 ||0 || || nattylinux-meta-ti-omap4 || || 2.6.38.1209.7||0 ||0 || || --- linux-backports-modules-2.6.38|| || 2.6.38-10.6 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-firmware|| || 1.52.1 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux || || 2.6.38-10.46 || 15 || 15 || || --- linux-ti-omap4|| || 2.6.38-1209.13 || 10 || 10 || || --- linux-meta|| || 2.6.38.10.25 ||0 ||0 || === Open discussion === If you have any work items for oneiric-alpha-2 please review them and push them out if they are not going to make it. -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2011-06-07
|| |||| || || || || || maverick linux-ports-meta || 2.6.35.28.21 || 2.6.35.30.23 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-backports-modules-2.6.35|| 2.6.35-28.20 || 2.6.35-30.22 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-meta|| 2.6.35.28.36 || 2.6.35.30.38 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-firmware|| 1.38.6 || 1.38.8 ||1 ||0 || || --- linux || 2.6.35-28.50 || 2.6.35-30.53 || 11 ||9 || |||| || || || || || nattylinux-ti-omap4|| || 2.6.38-1209.13 || 10 || 10 || || --- linux-backports-modules-2.6.38|| || 2.6.38-10.4 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-meta-ti-omap4 || || 2.6.38.1209.7||0 ||0 || || --- linux-meta|| || 2.6.38.10.24 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux || || 2.6.38-10.44 || 15 || 11 || |||| || || || || === Open Discussion or Questions: Raise your hand to be recognized === * First item is what to do with the Oneiric Bug Handling blueprint * The majority of remaining work items center around our bug tooling and are not release critical. IMO we don't really want/need this to be on the agenda each week. Thoughts? * We are going to be doing what we can using tooling and the rest add hock * I'll look over the blueprint and see where i can help out -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2011-05-31
||0 || || --- linux-backports-modules-2.6.35|| 2.6.35-28.20 || 2.6.35-29.21 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-meta|| 2.6.35.28.36 || 2.6.35.29.37 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-firmware|| 1.38.6 || 1.38.8 ||1 ||0 || || --- linux || 2.6.35-28.50 || 2.6.35-29.51 || 11 ||9 || |||| || || || || || nattylinux-ti-omap4|| || 2.6.38-1209.13 || 10 || 10 || || --- linux-backports-modules-2.6.38|| || 2.6.38-9.3 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-meta-ti-omap4 || || 2.6.38.1209.7||0 ||0 || || --- linux-meta|| || 2.6.38.9.23 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux || || 2.6.38-9.43 ||9 ||9 || |||| || || || || === Incoming Bugs: Regressions === Incoming Bugs * 12 Oneiric Bugs (up 3) * 1219 Natty Bugs (up 12) * 1126 Maverick Bugs (down 16) * 1029 Lucid Bugs (no change) Current regression stats (broken down by release): regression-update * 2 natty bug (up 1) * 42 maverick bugs (no change) * 75 lucid bugs (up 1) * 0 hardy bugs (no change) regression-release * 456 natty bugs (down 2) * 244 maverick bugs (no change) * 222 lucid bugs (no change) * 2 hardy bugs (no change) regression-proposed * 1 natty bugs (no change) * 2 maverick bugs (no change) * 0 lucid bugs (no change) === Open Discussion or Questions === Nothing this week. -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2011-05-24
|| 2.6.32.32.38 ||1 ||0 || ||--- linux-meta-ec2|| 2.6.32.314.15|| 2.6.32.316.17||0 ||0 || || || || || || || ||maverick linux-ports-meta || 2.6.35.28.21 || 2.6.35.29.22 ||0 ||0 || ||--- linux-backports-modules-2.6.35|| 2.6.35-28.20 || 2.6.35-29.21 ||0 ||0 || ||--- linux-meta|| 2.6.35.28.36 || 2.6.35.29.37 ||0 ||0 || ||--- linux-firmware|| 1.38.6 || 1.38.8 ||1 ||0 || ||--- linux || 2.6.35-28.50 || 2.6.35-29.51 || 11 ||9 || || || || || || || ||nattylinux-ti-omap4|| || 2.6.38-1209.13 || 10 || 10 || ||--- linux-backports-modules-2.6.38|| || 2.6.38-9.3 ||0 ||0 || ||--- linux-meta-ti-omap4 || || 2.6.38.1209.7||0 ||0 || ||--- linux-meta|| || 2.6.38.9.23 ||0 ||0 || ||--- linux || || 2.6.38-9.43 ||9 ||9 || || || || || || || * Note: Maverick proposed fails to boot on ec2. Currently investigating. === Incoming Bugs: Regressions === Incoming Bugs 9 Oneiric Bugs () 1207 Natty Bugs (up 273) 1142 Maverick Bugs (up 13) 1029 Lucid Bugs (up 7) Current regression stats (broken down by release): regression-update * 1 natty bug () * 42 maverick bugs (up 1) * 74 lucid bugs (no change) * 0 hardy bugs (no change) regression-release * 458 natty bugs (down 26) * 244 maverick bugs (up 2) * 222 lucid bugs (up 4) * 2 hardy bugs (no change) regression-proposed * 1 natty bugs (up 1) * 2 maverick bugs (no change) * 0 lucid bugs (no change) === Open Discussion or Questions === Nothing this week. -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2011-04-26
karmic bugs (no change) * 0 hardy bugs (no change) regression-release * 484 natty bugs (up 2) * 242 maverick bugs (down 8) * 218 lucid bugs (down 6) * 38 karmic bugs (no change) * 2 hardy bugs (no change) regression-proposed * 0 natty bugs (down 34) * 2 maverick bugs (up 1) * 0 lucid bugs (no change) * 0 karmic bugs (no change) === Incoming Bugs: Bug day report === I don't have another planned bug day until after UDS unless someone feels like there should be one. === Triage Status === Nothing new. === Open Discussion or Questions === Nothing new. -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2011-04-12
(up 3) Current regression stats (broken down by release): regression-update * 47 maverick bugs (up 1) * 77 lucid bugs (no change) * 6 karmic bugs (no change) * 0 hardy bugs (no change) regression-release * 335 natty bugs (up 48) * 249 maverick bugs (up 3) * 223 lucid bugs (up 1) * 38 karmic bugs (no change) * 2 hardy bugs (no change) regression-proposed * 17 natty bugs (up 2) * 1 maverick bugs (up 1) * 0 lucid bugs (no change) * 0 karmic bug (no change) === Incoming Bugs: Bug day report === Nothing new. === Triage Status === Nothing new. === Open Discussion or Questions === Nothing new. -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Using something better than Gobby for session notes at UDS
On 04/07/2011 02:45 AM, Scott Ritchie wrote: On 04/01/2011 10:00 AM, Robert Hooker wrote: I was *really* impressed with how well etherpad handled the load of hundreds of people with no downtime at the linux plumbers conference last year, a bigger server running it would do fine I imagine.. http://etherpad.osuosl.org/lpc2010-desktop To be fair the only real issue we had with Gobby last time was that the server kept crashing due to a bug (iirc it occurred when someone tried to delete a document). If that's fixed, it should perform just as well as Gobby in old UDSes, which seemed to work well enough. Etherpad is still better though, eg due to playback feature and easier web participation. Heh, you and I must be attending different UDSs. UDS-O will be my 5th and I don't think there has been a UDS where we haven't had issues with Gobby. Brad -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2011-04-05
stats (broken down by release): regression-update * 46 maverick bugs (up 4) * 77 lucid bugs (up 1) * 6 karmic bugs (down 1) * 0 hardy bugs (no change) regression-release * 287 natty bugs (up 70) * 246 maverick bugs (up 7) * 222 lucid bugs (no change) * 38 karmic bugs (no change) * 2 hardy bugs (no change) regression-proposed * 15 natty bugs (up 5) * 0 maverick bugs (no change) * 0 lucid bugs (no change) * 0 karmic bug (no change) === Incoming Bugs: Bug day report === My effort last week was a bit different as I did not advertise the bug day in the same way I normally do. In this last case, I directly pinged those parties that have provided the majority of the bug triage during our normally advertised bug days. I also pressed those who continually ask me to review bugs (other than through the normal channels) to asist us in triaging those bugs that they are bringing to my attention. It doesn't seem to have had the desired effect, so I'll be going back to the e-mail and blog/tweet for advertisement of our bug days. The next bug day will be next Tuesday. We will be focusing on regression-release bugs in all status starting with the new state. === Triage Status === I didn't do much in the way of triage for the past week, nor did I interact heavily with our triagers due to the need to plan for UDS a bit and to get my schedule in order for all of the tasks yet to do in this cycle. This week will likely be the same as I will be working ot implement the plan and close out my remaining tasks while drafting blueprint information for the O UDS. === Open Discussion or Questions === * (kamal) thanks ogasawara for the ubuntu-oneiric.git repo ... the Oneiric 2.6.39 kernel builds and works great on Natty! -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2011-03-29
|| 2.6.31-308.29||1 ||1 || || --- linux || 2.6.31-23.74 || 2.6.31-23.75 ||1 ||1 || |||| || || || || || lucidlinux-ec2 || 2.6.32-314.27|| 2.6.32-315.28||5 ||4 || || --- linux-ports-meta || 2.6.32.30.23 || 2.6.32.31.23 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-meta-lts-backport-maverick || 2.6.35.25.36 || 2.6.35.28.37 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-lts-backport-maverick || 2.6.35-25.44~lucid1 || 2.6.35-28.50~lucid1 || 13 || 12 || || --- linux-backports-modules-2.6.32|| 2.6.32-30.29 || 2.6.32-31.31 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-firmware|| 1.34.4 || 1.34.7 ||1 ||1 || || --- linux || 2.6.32-30.59 || 2.6.32-31.60 ||5 ||4 || || --- linux-meta|| 2.6.32.30.36 || 2.6.32.31.37 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-meta-ec2|| 2.6.32.314.15|| 2.6.32.315.16||0 ||0 || |||| || || || || || maverick linux-backports-modules-2.6.35|| 2.6.35-28.19 || 2.6.35-28.20 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux || 2.6.35-28.49 || 2.6.35-28.50 ||5 ||4 || |||| || || || || http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/versions.html has ner-live version information === Incoming Bugs: Regressions === Incoming Bugs 453 Natty Bugs (up 94) 1238 Maverick Bugs (up 6) 1053 Lucid Bugs (up 8) Current regression stats (broken down by release): regression-update * 42 maverick bugs (no change) * 76 lucid bugs (up 1) * 7 karmic bugs (no change) * 0 hardy bugs (no change) regression-release * 217 natty bugs (up 55) * 239 maverick bugs (down 3) * 222 lucid bugs (up 1) * 38 karmic bugs (no change) * 2 hardy bugs (no change) regression-proposed * 10 natty bugs (up 2) * 0 maverick bugs (no change) * 0 lucid bugs (no change) * 0 karmic bug (no change) === Incoming Bugs: Bug day report === Nothing new this week. === Triage Status === Another pretty slow week for triage. === Open Discussion or Questions: Raise your hand to be recognized === Nothing new this week. -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2011-03-22
|| |||| || || || || || maverick linux-mvl-dove|| || 2.6.32-416.33|| 17 || 14 || || --- linux-meta-mvl-dove || || 2.6.32.416.6 ||1 ||0 || || --- linux-firmware|| 1.38.4 || 1.38.5 ||3 ||2 || || --- linux || 2.6.35-28.49 || 2.6.35-28.50 ||6 ||0 || |||| || || || || === Incoming Bugs: Regressions === Incoming Bugs 359 Natty Bugs (up 62) 1232 Maverick Bugs (up 14) 1045 Lucid Bugs (up 11) Current regression stats (broken down by release): regression-update * 42 maverick bugs (up 2) * 75 lucid bugs (up 1) * 7 karmic bugs (no change) * 0 hardy bugs (no change) regression-release * 162 natty bugs (up 31) * 242 maverick bugs (up 2) * 221 lucid bugs (no change) * 38 karmic bugs (no change) * 2 hardy bugs (no change) regression-proposed * 8 natty bugs (up 3) * 0 maverick bugs (no change) * 0 lucid bugs (down 1) * 0 karmic bug (no change) === Incoming Bugs: Bug day report === I've postponed today's bug day to next week. I was unable to prepare for it, so I will send out e-mail today for the next one which should be covering bugs in the confirmed state. === Triage Status === Answered some askubuntu questions with the help of various team members. Other than that, it was a slow week for triage. === Open Discussion or Questions === Nothing new. -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2011-03-15
|| 1.34.7 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux || 2.6.32-29.58 || 2.6.32-30.59 ||3 ||3 || || --- linux-fsl-imx51 || 2.6.31-608.22|| 2.6.31-608.25||0 ||0 || || --- linux-meta|| 2.6.32.29.35 || 2.6.32.30.36 ||0 ||0 || |||| || || || || || maverick linux-ports-meta || 2.6.35.27.21 || 2.6.35.28.21 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-mvl-dove|| || 2.6.32-414.30||9 ||9 || || --- linux-meta-mvl-dove || || 2.6.32.414.4 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-firmware|| 1.38.4 || 1.38.5 ||1 ||1 || || --- linux || 2.6.35-27.48 || 2.6.35-28.49 ||4 ||4 || || --- linux-backports-modules-2.6.35|| 2.6.35-27.18 || 2.6.35-28.19 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-meta|| 2.6.35.27.35 || 2.6.35.28.36 ||0 ||0 || |||| || || || || === Status: HW Cert. Team === This week we finised testing both the Maverick and the Lucid kernel. Results are publicly available: All the 75 systems passed the SRU tests (the minor errors are problems with the script themselves). So, from our side, they are good to go. We updated the tracking bugs with this information as well. === Incoming Bugs: Regressions === Incoming Bugs 297 Natty Bugs (up 72) 1218 Maverick Bugs (up 18) 1034 Lucid Bugs (up 3) Current regression stats (broken down by release): regression-update * 40 maverick bugs (no change) * 74 lucid bugs (down 2) * 7 karmic bugs (no change) * 0 hardy bugs (no change) regression-release * 131 natty bugs (up 37) * 240 maverick bugs (up 6) * 221 lucid bugs (no change) * 38 karmic bugs (no change) * 2 hardy bugs (no change) regression-proposed * 5 natty bugs (up 4) * 0 maverick bugs (no change) * 1 lucid bugs (up 1) * 0 karmic bug (no change) === Incoming Bugs: Bug day report === Last week's bug day was a success. We had several individuals helping to triage new state bugs and we got a number of them triaged and into the proper status. The next bug day will be next Tuesday. The focus will be on bugs in the confirmed state. === Triage Status === There is always tremendous interest in having me look at a particular bug here and there. I am still working to get these interested parties to approach me in the pulblic channel versus currently getting pinged in private windows. We have had some further interest in working bugs from individuals geared toward beginning device driver and module work. As much as it pains me, we had to explain that bugs were likely not the best way to go to get into module development. :-) === Open Discussion or Questions: === Welcome back ogasawara !!! -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2011-02-15
|| 1.34.3 || 1.34.4 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux || 2.6.32-28.55 || 2.6.32-29.58 ||6 ||6 || || --- linux-fsl-imx51 || 2.6.31-608.20|| 2.6.31-608.22||1 ||1 || || --- linux-backports-modules-2.6.32|| 2.6.32-28.27 || 2.6.32-29.28 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-meta-ec2|| 2.6.32.312.13|| 2.6.32.313.14||0 ||0 || |||| || || || || || maverick linux-ports-meta || 2.6.35.25.19 || 2.6.35.27.21 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-mvl-dove|| || 2.6.32-414.30||4 ||4 || || --- linux-meta-mvl-dove || || 2.6.32.414.4 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-firmware|| 1.38.3 || 1.38.4 ||1 ||1 || || --- linux || 2.6.35-25.44 || 2.6.35-27.47 || 13 || 13 || || --- linux-backports-modules-2.6.35|| 2.6.35-25.16 || 2.6.35-27.18 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-meta|| 2.6.35.25.32 || 2.6.35.27.34 ||0 ||0 || |||| || || || || === Incoming Bugs: Regressions === Incoming Bugs 180 Natty Bugs (up 11) 1185 Maverick Bugs (up 33) 1019 Lucid Bugs (up 6) Current regression stats (broken down by release): regression-update * 39 maverick bugs (no change) * 77 lucid bugs (no change) * 7 karmic bugs (no change) * 0 hardy bugs (no change) regression-release * 70 natty bugs (not tracked yet) * 237 maverick bugs (up 9) * 208 lucid bugs (no change) * 38 karmic bugs (no change) * 2 hardy bugs (no change) regression-proposed * 1 natty bugs (down 2) * 2 maverick bugs (down 4) * 0 lucid bugs (no change) * 0 karmic bug (no change) === Incoming Bugs: Bug day report === Today is Bug Day. We are looking at bugs in the new state. I'd like to ae another Bug Day next week covering Confirmed bugs. I'll post details to the mailing lists and our voices blog. I've also added twitter notices to my list of announcements for Bug Days, so far we have had a more positive response to this than I expected. === Triage Status === Nothing new. === Open Discussion or Questions === Nothing new. -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2011-02-15
|| 2.6.32-211.27|| 2.6.32-214.30||5 ||3 || || --- linux-meta-mvl-dove || 2.6.32.209.12|| 2.6.32.214.15||0 ||0 || || --- linux-lts-backport-maverick || 2.6.35-23.41~lucid1 || 2.6.35-25.44~lucid1 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-meta|| 2.6.32.28.32 || 2.6.32.29.34 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-firmware|| 1.34.3 || 1.34.4 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux || 2.6.32-28.55 || 2.6.32-29.58 ||5 ||3 || || --- linux-fsl-imx51 || 2.6.31-608.20|| 2.6.31-608.22||0 ||0 || || --- linux-backports-modules-2.6.32|| 2.6.32-28.27 || 2.6.32-29.28 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-meta-ec2|| 2.6.32.312.13|| 2.6.32.313.14||0 ||0 || |||| || || || || || maverick linux-ports-meta || 2.6.35.25.19 || 2.6.35.27.21 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-mvl-dove|| || 2.6.32-414.30||2 ||2 || || --- linux-meta-mvl-dove || || 2.6.32.414.4 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-firmware|| 1.38.3 || 1.38.4 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux || 2.6.35-25.44 || 2.6.35-27.47 ||8 ||8 || || --- linux-backports-modules-2.6.35|| 2.6.35-25.16 || 2.6.35-27.18 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-meta|| 2.6.35.25.32 || 2.6.35.27.34 ||0 ||0 || |||| || || || || Note - There is a new live(ish) web page that displays the kernel versions in a format similar to that above, without the bug verification counts. That page is here: https://kernel-tools.canonical.com/versions.html. The page is updated every 15 minutes. === Incoming Bugs: Regressions === Incoming Bugs 169 Natty Bugs (up 20) 1152 Maverick Bugs (up 11) 1013 Lucid Bugs (up 8) Current regression stats (broken down by release): regression-update * 39 maverick bugs (up 4) * 77 lucid bugs (up 2) * 7 karmic bugs (up 1) * 0 hardy bugs (no change) regression-release * 228 maverick bugs (up 8) * 208 lucid bugs (up 2) * 38 karmic bugs (no change) * 2 hardy bugs (no change) regression-proposed * 3 natty bugs () * 6 maverick bugs (down 8) * 0 lucid bugs (down 2) * 0 karmic bug (down 1) === Incoming Bugs: Bug day report === The next bug day will be next Tuesday. I will put out information on this bug day today. I'd like to go into the bugs in the new state again as many of these are still in an incorrect status. === Triage Status === Nothing to report === Open Discussion or Questions: Raise your hand to be recognized === Nothing this week -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2010-12-14
||3 ||3 || || --- linux-ports-meta|| 2.6.32.26.19 || 2.6.32.27.20 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-lts-backport-maverick || 2.6.35-22.34~lucid1 || 2.6.35-23.41~lucid1 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-backports-modules-2.6.32 || 2.6.32-26.25 || 2.6.32-27.26 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux || 2.6.32-26.48 || 2.6.32-27.49 ||3 ||3 || || --- linux-meta || 2.6.32.26.28 || 2.6.32.27.29 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-meta-ec2 || 2.6.32.310.11|| 2.6.32.311.12||0 ||0 || || || || || || || || maverick linux-backports-modules-2.6.35 || 2.6.35-23.13 || 2.6.35-24.15 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-ports-meta|| 2.6.35.23.17 || 2.6.35.24.18 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux-meta || 2.6.35.23.25 || 2.6.35.24.28 ||0 ||0 || || --- linux || 2.6.35-23.41 || 2.6.35-24.42 || 14 || 14 || || || || || || || === Incoming Bugs: Regressions === Incoming Bugs 38 Natty Bugs (up 6) 1127 Maverick Bugs (up 14) 1096 Lucid Bugs (down 14) Current regression stats (broken down by release): regression-update * 26 maverick bugs (up 1) * 76 lucid bugs (down 7) * 6 karmic bugs (no change) * 0 hardy bugs (no change) regression-release * 177 maverick bugs (up 2) * 198 lucid bugs (no change) * 40 karmic bugs (no change) * 2 hardy bugs (no change) regression-proposed * 13 maverick bugs (no change) * 3 lucid bugs (down 3) * 1 karmic bug (no change) === Incoming Bugs: Bug day report === The next bug day will be next week. I'd like for that one to focus on regression-proposed bugs since the ones that I have on my list have been there too long to be seriously considered as legitimate bugs in the proposed queue. I've decided to use this small segment of bugs due to the majority of interested people being on holiday. === Triage Status === I have begun testing the script that replaces one tag with another. There is a pre-existing script that bjf made me aware of, and I am looking at that for some of the other scripts I have/had planned. === Open Discussion or Questions: Raise your hand to be recognized === * One thing i'd like to point out is that this will be the last irc meeting of this year, the next will likely be Jan. 4, 2011 * The entire team wished everyone Happy Holidays!! Hope you enjoy your vacations. -- Brad Figg brad.f...@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2010-11-16
the help and understanding. This first test run through the process steps has been very labor intensive, slow, and error prone. * We are refining the process as we go. Details are being maintained on the wiki page linked above. * Martin Pitt has agreed to change the verification tagging for bugs to verification=[needed|failed|done]-release in order to help us track verification in different released kernels within the same bug. BR BR Reverted patches will be reapplied once the appropriate action is taken in the bug report. For specific details see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/StableReleaseCadence === Status: Natty === apw just uploaded -4.13 yesterday. the 2.6.37-rc2 is in the works. === Security bugfix kernels - Maverick/Lucid/Karmic/Hardy/Dapper === || || Upd./Sec. || Proposed || TiP || Verified || || Dapper: Kernel || 2.6.15-55.89 || || || || || Hardy: Kernel || 2.6.24-28.80 || || || || || = LRM || 2.6.24.18-28.7|| || || || || Karmic: Kernel || 2.6.31-22.68 || || || || || = mvl-dove|| 2.6.31-214.30 || 2.6.31-214.32 || || || || = ec2 || 2.6.31-307.21 || || || || || Lucid: Kernel || 2.6.32-25.45 || 3.6.32-26.47 || 14 || 6 / 24 || || = LBM || 2.6.32-25.24 || 2.6.32-26.25 || || || || = mvl-dove|| 2.6.32-209.25 || 2.6.32-211.27 || || || || = fsl-imx51 || 2.6.31-608.19 || 2.6.31-608.20 || || || || = ec2 || 2.6.32-309.18 || || || || || = lts-backport-maverick || 2.6.35.22.34 || || || || || Maverick: Kernel|| 2.6.35-22.35 || 3.6.35-23.38 || 14 || 12 / 30 || || = mvl-dove|| 2.6.32-410.27 || || || || || = ti-omap4|| 2.6.35-903.18 || || || || === Incoming Bugs: Regressions === Incoming Bugs 12 Natty Bugs 1025 Maverick Bugs (up 304 since the final maverick meeting) 1082 Lucid Bugs (up 68 since the final maverick meeting) Current regression stats (broken down by release): regression-potential As this tag is deprecated, this listing is only to ensure that I keep it on my radar until changes to the apport hooks and my processing of the currently tagged bugs is completed. * 3 natty bugs * 396 maverick bugs (up 32 since the final maverick meeting) * 177 lucid bugs (up 14 since the final maverick meeting) regression-update * 20 maverick bugs * 77 lucid bugs (up 13) * 6 karmic bugs (no change) * 0 hardy bugs (no change) regression-release * 147 maverick bugs * 193 lucid bugs (up 16) * 40 karmic bugs (up 3) * 2 hardy bugs (no change) regression-proposed * 13 maverick bugs * 7 lucid bugs (up 1) * 1 karmic bug (no change) Please note that I have removed Jaunty from the listing above. === Incoming Bugs: Bug day report === The next Kernel Bug Day will be next Tuesday. The focus will be on bugs with patches attached in order to begin the serious amount of work to be done there. I am planning to work with Andy and Tim this week to see how we will handle Team Bug Days since we are changing the way we do the Top Bugs each week. I will also begin working up a weekly report of the major bugs we are looking at. Chances are I will make some of that data available during this meeting going forward. BR BR Please note that if we take any of those patches, we either need the HW to verify them or have a commitment from the community to verify them or they weill be reverted === Triage Status === I talked with a number of the folks we work with to triage bugs during UDS, but, other than that, I have nothing to report on as far as status. I am, however, interested in your thoughts on holding another Kernel Triage Summit. We could do our own again, or we can make it a part of one of the community events such as Ubuntu Developer Week, Open Week, etc. BR BR Based on all the effort that you've put into getting community involvement, did we get any value or would you have been better off just doing that amount of effort in triaging yourself? BR BR We saw some benefit, but I think it is too early to tell the impact. I'd have to defer to those who presented and attended as to the usefulness. I felt it was a success, more so than I had hoped for. BR BR I'm asking about community triaging in general BR BR We saw some improvement, but I don't know if it was commensurate with the effort involved in organizing our own. In summary I think I could have just done the triage effort myself. === Open Discussion or Questions === Noting new this week. -- Brad Figg
