Fwd: ceph: dropping support for armhf
Forwarding to -devel for wider discussion -- Forwarded message - From: James Page Date: Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:00 AM Subject: ceph: dropping support for armhf To: ubuntu-server Hi -server Every cycle we go through a bit/lot of pain as new versions of Ceph are released; the upstream project does zero testing on 32 bit architectures so a new drop of the Ceph source package normally results in several long iterations (due to the build time of ceph) to identify and resolve 32 != 64 bit type issues across the new delta in the code base. I'd like to propose dropping armhf (as the last 32 bit architecture in Ubuntu) as an architecture Ceph is built for; there are a number of reverse depends which would need an update as well: fio libvirt nfs-ganesha qemu tcmu-runner tgt uwsgi I'd also like to understand whether there is actually any subset of users actually using the armhf packages that Ubuntu provides for Ceph! Cheers James -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
[sru] OpenStack SRU's - add OVN to supporting projects list
Hi SRU Team I've made/proposed an update to: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates For 20.04, OVN is the default/preferred SDN for OpenStack deployments on Ubuntu; as such we'd like to include it in the SRU process we have for stable point releases alongside OpenvSwitch. We have appropriate deployment and testing tooling to cover OVN as part of an OpenStack deployment in the same way that we do Neutron ML2/OVS for earlier releases. First usage of this will be: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ovn/+bug/1897248 Please could a member of the SRU team review and approve our proposed update to the list of supporting packages. Regards James -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Launchpad builders - increasing memory spec
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 at 23:36 Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: [...] > Yeah, if we make all builders x4 the size, it may mean we will have 4x > less /builders/. > Builders are currently 4G then with 4 cores? maybe a doubling might be a more sensible proposal to start with. I think I've also seen a sqlite in memory based set of unit test failures in Neutron which I've never been able to pin down but again it feels like memory contention within the builder. Upstream don't see the same thing, but their minimum spec for a unit testing machine is >=8G. -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Launchpad builders - increasing memory spec
Hi All Mathias and I where discussing some challenges around fitting the Ceph build with any level of parallelism in to a virtualized launchpad builder (as used for the majority of architectures today). Basically the current memory spec only permits a max-parallel of 2 (on Xenial amd64). Ceph is a big C++ project so takes some time to build with such a low level of parallelism. Would it be possible to nudge up the default memory allocation on the builders? I use a 16G machine for test builds of i386/amd64 and I've not seen any memory exhaustion with parallel=8. Or maybe have a mechanism to allow a source package to request a higher spec of builder? Thoughts? James -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
sqlalchemy 1.1 for artful
Hi All sqlalchemy 1.0.x has been creating some awkward unit test races in some OpenStack projects (specifically neutron, and I'm fed up of hitting rebuild); I've started work on the transition to sqlalchemy 1.1.x for artful in: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/2739/+packages reverse-depends currently have versioned Depends on sqlachemy - a no-change rebuild is required to update those. Cheers James -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Patch Pilot Report - 20150602
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Not that productive a session: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1455608 Some debate around whether the development fix needs some tweaking. Parking for now https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1449056 Committed and uploaded to Debian unstable - will autosync when accepted. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1459046 Proposed fix not a clean cherry pick, and does not really resolve the problem. Made some suggestions and pinged team on IRC. Un-subbed sponsors for now. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1401141 Reviewed - but not comfortable sponsoring this set of SRU's to fix infiniband support in isc-dhcp as the patches, although upstream, are quite invasive. Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVbZuXAAoJEL/srsug59jDLXkQAJS1mpq5h3IoaqKEdbb/nYXV fPChd2V7C/BOezXctbRVpxvJvh3Fd538I4tQENO9Mxt1Zv0vg6+GBaqCBNWVJX2v ex7QJ1ITq7ZEIdR2v2heYsuGwqCvz9YMs6yDpxIrg1OzcIlgi/VvqcDckBquKUt4 B7pghoyJ288qwfbUmm8lMVqAq+6fsG7/GqMlrSl9u5B6VzCzS1VmpboWwjhX88mB 7GF4lfDx5ZlSuKAzAgvISB9F1ieEKwsL0ZgKafU0alauvaOZssWA7YZ64gNQzBMb HuPXe9elV90e9Gu3oQeh4QG9KBdlkQsv3j5qXq/py11it9TUvjhb2hoxo8+RoAC0 wKhrGu/qinc1F1ajL0Lh0MHF10I4duD5j8u/i81MdstSLxSwCyn1EM739tprjrYI 8F5ioR9ccNyFf55OuE+F1M2A072INuMBizcN/tURxkJRaxx7BwLXF71HFGwtTfLO 038oUmWMykGO5iq07Qvvr24+tL6mmnK1OeN+2uliBPUw5UP/w8WgwhKxOvzuq61E G5YNtRNShRb5L9yYRGc+yJ+CPbWjcLhcnYNq3U5olq0xTv/2+Gtj/qpWO72oMkoF QI3Zsr/hf/35trVmcAr4ASbC+DgTxJW7vTz4aLwsvu5+IAkqs/XGSHRTYzZOZD+j hxwyUUb3o/cbJNdJ3V03 =dyOO -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Patch Pilot, 6th June 2014
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Queue at start of period: 49 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/biosdevname/+bug/1324558 - All patches uploaded for SRU, un-subscribed sponsors. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/1275656 - All patches uploaded for SRU, un-subscribed sponsors. https://code.launchpad.net/~moha/ubuntu/trusty/openvswitch/fix-for-1315306/+merge/218510 - Needed some work with reference to patch annotation and changelog, provided feedback (in-line commenting is making this so much easier) and marked WIP. https://code.launchpad.net/~damian-revanth/ubuntu/trusty/spamassassin/fix-1318270/+merge/220998 - Requested some annotation of the patch in terms of origin, marked WIP. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1307682 - Nothing for sponsors to sponsor just yet - un-subscribed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aircrack-ng/+bug/693313 - In hand, no-op. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/1296755 - saucy, precise: Patch headers need some work - provided feedback. - precise: actually a backport, changelog needs some updates as well. - I'd normally just fix these up myself but I know that Louis is working towards more than contributing developer membership! https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-babel/+bug/1299442 - Version to trigger migrations between dir<->symlink incorrect which would caused repeated invocation in subsequent SRU's - provided feedback. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/finish-install/+bug/1320327 - LGTM - but not familiar with this package so pinged cjwatson and infinity for second review. - +1 from cjwatson - uploaded. https://code.launchpad.net/~kentb/ubuntu/trusty/openwsman/bug-1319089/+merge/219402 - Pending some actions around CVE assignment as requested by security team - marked WIP and asked proposer to mark 'Needs Review' when its ready. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-tools/+bug/1251563 - Needs a merge from Debian prior to SRU activity but generally +1 for the patch - made comment to this effect and started to peek at the merge. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/augeas/+bug/1310120 - LGTM - uploaded to utopic and trusty. Queue at end of period: 43 Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTkZt+AAoJEL/srsug59jD+bcP/3aeyVtkpnKg7Wj3WCF5EOoH WvKjh7OsQVVHo8KsiGUKwP+QMyH0880lqArQkCCJw0v347peLJLWYqcM0Q85D9Q1 cgIFPFMz3/JETNJc34BprK6SwIqZp3z5tEHDBd7hRsWJUzkUlZVtrZctVWs1xwME G7KT/G0+LrkdFJ/sONx6EaepWidksRjKv04D3Ue3VaHm0TVZpjXhQypkn+30b0WM tn3D4SBOT2I8ZA/3aTa5S0ch5uAjiThxhjqYTRU7igU1jG5ilF+4PYY9prFIP5ww XA+tRFqj79U2E6pGWBBYxmc5z525qKtwqTwMDIwU+9ByV8+cRTizUyAdlt9BNVDy 7nuzMthqR0zAg5+oYsVeZV9WqzTZ1eQr+ezLYrJZCyNk6F9Km2qOcb6UYtIXwFfn X2aXj8HVTwqXRinzxMqNK/gPnB5lohzXRQD+T5jpT/19h2LVvvE/HtTU2DAk1esa EHelR7sul3IqBGCZMKyaJCDGvlX1k/2zU9WvHHkD9yeYaHYLJ+Sdwxn+pP59o9tp 880nhTLPrF5B9W2+x99CqR8IBuOvhkAAjMOsx1W2q6ZWmRNDojj9KdJ0BES4FHOJ rX/rR8q/dBG61ShzvjCM5luT8pjpJRoIR6XGvF2Jnpk5KI6F8McJViARftrKxuns QXk7M8uNbWRMDVXe5qVh =4ZsU -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Server team meeting minutes: 2014-04-08
On 08/04/14 18:10, Robie Basak wrote: > A few last pieces are being worked in the last couple of days to > final freeze. > > * James Page is struggling to find a release team member to review > the docker.io feature freeze exception request (bug 1295093). Now completed; Dave Walker did the honours! Thanks Daviey.... -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: [RFC] 12.04.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/02/14 18:00, Leann Ogasawara wrote: [...] > Providing a 12.04.5 point release will add no additional > maintenance burden upon teams supporting enablement stacks in > Precise. It would require some extra effort on part of the > Canonical Foundations Team as well as the Ubuntu Release Team to > spin up an additional set of images and testing coordination etc. > However, I informally discussed this with a few members of each of > those teams and the tentative agreement was that 12.04.5 was a > reasonable request which could be accommodated. Collectively we > could find no compelling reason to not provide 12.04.5. We also > discussed that a 12.04.5 release should be optional for the Flavors > to participate in. Additionally, we would want to purposely avoid > clashing the 14.04.1 and 12.04.5 release dates and would suggest > releasing 14.04.1 first and 12.04.5 after (exact date TBD). > > What are other's thoughts here? Does anyone have a compelling > reason for not providing a 12.04.5 point release? +1 on release and proposal for timing - works well from a server team perspective! Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJS+OPDAAoJEL/srsug59jDDj8P/2gvM6wEcppJr1e8aDNTPI/c VjJ4iVgRZ5NQzKrwZbZrA9KS2v+7NiyGRoy5D6rU5yvbsQH2fKWUtBkUtyOkqgAV qTGyUwm8ub3JvZVlHOhUQmMKEBhso8tYN+E69B0WMubMWohpUp++Q/vWbaJ65p4D sc7iSahYBHgjMWViFOddMnRJg4uA4ae0RZwiXjpFqQ5a9OjzlxyJuwivLW+M9yB/ swNUWJZc471Tpt0oJ9egAjGtwkLWAuL7dP0wSRgX1QIubJlpFj0kHyQcJDXwB6R0 wrkJtAVfKBl2pFeuZoyuPH0kwem0G5LmymWQ2MfgbUto2gZ+RhuUjb/n/8sCYaiv EmGqJvhJu3EMQXy3B37JY72Q45VC6003f5l887wb//LOmE7ovLGXdQPhjZ6WfpNi MgRkT8TYFuOsqpXfGTNmODKdqXaY0P2uyFafSj2jrw6Mf/6w7nnTFPiEr8TjyVfr nsaelDX0vEH+T4+I5uLRnl4l8qE8DQ98WHXqxvtUcsfUTrAcsqn/oCKhQmhEQ+l0 3PMg9zDUXpnjitjoyjBQ1Mi5ewjQ1hldIsJ2Oq2HqFMyi57JPQTmesvEFejvFCXt LzAHAsoOsG4FoWC7F7evqX4QHhZebIwSQCbgr6Z9Y2jlTqkMhN1vi1xi5iySRA07 yQ9sYa0J4H0yi2aVTlOV =D0QB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Potential Server Seed impact for 14.04: removal of OpenJDK/Tomcat7 from Ubuntu main
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Folks On 21/01/14 18:16, James Page wrote: > What do people think to this plan? Are OpenJDK and Tomcat7 > important packages for Ubuntu users? Will not having a well > supported OpenJDK implementation in Ubuntu main discourage people > from using Ubuntu to host their Java based applications? Or do > users still just use the Oracle Java downloads instead and ignore > what Ubuntu provides? > > Let me know what you think... Thanks to everyone who responded to this post both on and off list; as I expected, quite a few users depend on a well supported OpenJDK in Ubuntu in preference to using binary downloads from Oracle. Ubuntu 14.04 will ship with both OpenJDK 7 and Tomcat 7 in Ubuntu main. EOM - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJS6Ph0AAoJEL/srsug59jDS+AP+wbMDCravamCa2VkZbcaOVd9 n3TKj5SznjorGTVULYZPY8/OUunA8Kf9iFkcBJA1ti2f62klrBJ0RCamhfifdSh+ bpfQm2X98P8hDdACRFsnEBIAhnl+6Hkp08OvWEQJlkdGS1j8+/oSw6EIWxuSgUb7 yUktnRTRNcHfrpSUetg2DCiIMe8e8JoOdPKWAr/glqlwylhD2Noy2Unr8meXh8bg 9IKvWGyf0UvLATT4gLq2otzfslY/ZGEjGnaLWMrHZwofNDh4cV8u4rhLzxJTv7MZ 0rYC+38tsctABUUQ76NbE4uRYchdxiGEPd7QEs+0LSMNeMnsvupC+SjoaYHsB0Xp 39OFZT5/Mtg+PFHT2UmY541ptF16cCNhpam/zG/J1Bp6Xd14Nhw+oVmEKIzNsfJa tl1DhE5oR42cdBlvlvMHaVm0wpGeZoi9Ivx2E63+IA4OsCWxHmRM7TJDfKOxXmWS qhTUvEXjNXCcz5OPuozYFFIgSxhX7czhXWIi5wDP74cdncJXhw871w9y1W0zQRAC oeZxw3oiIq4IH2JHVh2+dMZ2vW3+cC1PxKBACMYWG1Bgq8gVQ/8VAR7fIjglwJ5J Qh1tr3sf2cDUiFqP0iWTXSIkIUamBxxO65rvzps5CW8K3q7Zph3eccEcdLWYkVeK 4Dq4bkXxa4yRmidl98lF =s+Rr -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Potential Server Seed impact for 14.04: removal of OpenJDK/Tomcat7 from Ubuntu main
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Folks The first round of seed review changes have now been applied to the server seeds; quite a few bits have dropped out of main and the size of the server ISO has reduced! Next - the foundations team have been reviewing whether we should continue to provide OpenJDK as the default Java implementation in Ubuntu; this package is quite a resource drain on both the foundations and security teams from a SRU perspective so demotion of openjdk7 to universe is being considered. Most Java-ish things in main can be built using gcj; however Tomcat7 is not going to work with gcj so would end up being demoted as well. What do people think to this plan? Are OpenJDK and Tomcat7 important packages for Ubuntu users? Will not having a well supported OpenJDK implementation in Ubuntu main discourage people from using Ubuntu to host their Java based applications? Or do users still just use the Oracle Java downloads instead and ignore what Ubuntu provides? Let me know what you think... Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJS3rl4AAoJEL/srsug59jDRJ8P/jPv6J8oHhjq07XB6EFMJRL7 Fli5bqbtNeH+hrZbqVBtvvj7C1+4fKpDB8ZHplNK8SYpv5MEmoiqhDm48deB3Lco 4tWt7BF5iLa8xdNG4RWwWNiGeLhvL6lKpAEYZEygVvoRs9WvTzAZ9GGipBg/Y0d+ fVvYUshKss+AckS8pk4GKmbGcYTw7tpPyLa9+DjubDLpcLnRgDouvWRTpm51P9Hu gJHhktrzQIHDVVBaXJfyQIV7Iv/M0SIHgeWQTX2SkAKaOh38qYoDVmUFseGDNiez v139UjILwqBS+Ods9oULTn55pujgkkgO56Z0TGOtf2qMJoJ9OdL61aCys4e/sW7c wqZapvVVS0vGyAiCUoezTdh11v4hq6c9lNBkZyV75936LPCoNTl8JVDeHTle2ZHO WSZE+hgnsS/ZB4b54+osF6Guaa4m7irUA3but9XNfi/+3nCZx+d06+z4GRKwmQii 8EvdronhYJ8U7NzoJXXZpXcrEQ2lRJz2Hh4bozGqvtx27mq2bdrPSFcscjb/Qxz/ ebHcfEUoLrWWSyFXpJXKIV1FTwOCb1O7/yZrka9YR2DQno2vMOlWkadHkrCUqYF4 4dLcRteYy/8sLP2X8q/tcm77ed66pbYBPicbVlrjo8iGqRwPZJWnRtQeiF8VnvZr LU1DSuFkmfioCAZEorVf =N8o8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Ubuntu Server seeded package review
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Folks As part of tidying for the next LTS release, the Server Team are proposing a review of server released seeded packages that are currently in Ubuntu main (proposed changes tracked in [0] for now). Here's the initial review of seeds, and some proposed moves and drops we are considering: Branch: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntu.trusty http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntu.trusty/view/head:/server Description: Default server install whoopsie (ack'ed by ev) wireless-tools wpasupplicant http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntu.trusty/view/head:/server-ship Description: Server ISO image nut, nut-cgi, nut-snmp (move to supported-misc-servers) likewise-open (largely unmaintained in distro - https://help.ubuntu.com/community/LikewiseOpen) powernap, powernap-server (still revelvant?) quagga (maybe move to supported-misc-servers) backuppc python-beautifulsoup python-genshi (will be pulled into main via supported-misc-servers ... python-pecan) whoopsie (ack'ed by ev) mutt http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntu.trusty/view/head:/cloud-image Description: Default cloud-image install whoopsie (ack'ed by ev) tasksel (drops aptitude etc.) euca2ools (move to supported-misc-servers) Branch: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/platform.trusty http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/platform.trusty/view/head:/supported-misc-servers Description: Other supported stuff which is not on the ISO No candidates identified And a few other packages that we'd like to not be part of the cloud images (which include the 'cloud-image' and 'server' seeds). These are not explicitly listed in either of these seeds but are pulled in due to dependencies or Recommends. ppp usbutils os-prober aptitude memtest86 ... and discuss! I'd like to land any changes early in 2014 prior to feature freeze. Cheers James [0] http://pad.ubuntu.com/server-seed-review - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSngfVAAoJEL/srsug59jDDG4QAJbbX1aii7pw1mOVliFOjrHc uDunTZ3acW9dpCL2CdnkHc1TDnEMczko/7Rm8VhdNqENkUc7Z3V6NEaq7itgG/a2 w6dyszKm8c8MWvnr6lTpor1Hjb+7qomRZdqbQyQZGPCxQyrLbDR62ggEqYztVf36 glatqylywKRIYhSdTCjD7OteDi9Sur76JOdmAkng+BsjWTnxFQgjju19qpl3MDvm iOzmd2WQk0GAGQWmrU/8UrKwjglPD+qXJpRjpdSQ3N2iKZRzW3XRXoXMlybqalJC dkXnfaDSv8sJsFZXatEA6T/3zcpZaByRcdxpEq8aP+EMTov1F6kDtBrXLfWquQGU V9BRRbfQCA+xPci9lqpcaRha1boFCGTDbp8zOpPhWUoJQzbUS/x1aKjrSggbRj+v jvrpPxsDud2xOVEcl5rIpmjEkv1YLTh0AVJL1rMI/CvXXvA52dlMwy2qoxN+i4JW PHMWVH6M29lNfO37/n3uloznVlNde+qR1uuUkZyzd86piHOReTUejUS+Cw5DxtAl EJooyuT/6eKVx2gY/MvkAWAiOxVXaHl8NaGr/l7sIZTOgL4eYw4flI1Z87X2O7X5 fUM9iHX31wU8+jIjEehjeOWWaPNJ1WNMS+L8T9SiqCjy+PHvHAajhWd1hUrLiKs8 HYRLA2uA4Zlf2pOuA6CL =fbfY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Patch Pilot Report 20131118
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jsch/+bug/1249591 New dependency still needs MIR - took a quick look - should be OK - pinged bug reporter to see if they where OK todo the MIR as well. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/horizon/+bug/1130608 Needs re-basing for Havana; pinged reporter, unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors until ready for review. https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/981269 Reviewed proposed patch; incomplete backport of bugfix in Folsom; requested that a more complete cherry-pick be done before upload to proposed; unsubscribed sponsors for the time being. https://code.launchpad.net/~yolanda.robla/ubuntu/trusty/tomcat7/add_distribution/+merge/194817 Discussed with Yolanda on IRC and suggested an alternative approach which is much less resource intensive for such a common operation. Marked WIP. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.5/+bug/1121874 Needs re-basing for latest mysql updates; rebased trusty version, tested and uploaded; asked proposer to rebase SRU debdiffs (again :-(). https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/audit/+bug/1251795 Ran some upgrade testing to exercise the .d rules migration in the maintainer scripts; did not work as intended (well at least I think so) so pinged Tyler to check on what should happen and with my test results, marked Incomplete. https://code.launchpad.net/~utlemming/ubuntu/saucy/walinuxagent/series_bug_fixes/+merge/176419 Already merged; marked so. https://code.launchpad.net/~utlemming/ubuntu/saucy/walinuxagent/new_location/+merge/180215 Merged as UNRELEASED into trunk branch. https://code.launchpad.net/~dannf/ubuntu/trusty/base-installer/lp1247601/+merge/193834 This looks OK technically but not sure about installation from universe; added comment and deferred to someone more knowledgeable. https://code.launchpad.net/~utlemming/ubuntu/precise/cloud-init/lp123315-1231490/+merge/191470 Already merged; marked so. https://code.launchpad.net/~med/ubuntu-seeds/sosreport/+merge/179485 Pinged smoser and utlemming as impacts cloud-images. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librcc/+bug/1183580 Already uploaded to trusty; reviewed saucy SRU and uploaded to proposed for SRU team review. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSigQWAAoJEL/srsug59jDjB8QALaC54Put0CfF+nHH9VdAYYv ZNTYfI1jbvmiIY/ENXuQ8g6zk9McatvzMcLAUlVap1NXYt7gnx+joZLVuG83n9DE +asQQ4eTDFz/RPfxemfn7rfttH+mQMLHtjXGjoLGlji8ZmuXPZ7BTz2UYGTcyMPl gm0nxIYNkohemWKpGgmIWJIppJo5e2sRpFw1i53P94IkLoBArdiMmflsLT/ThWod jArg3o1YYiaPRGaS3EE5F9k8r3HzgQERoPXxbdO6X9DstYtnwADXCAgDlw20xrRl SZOn4zz6wDCH9C/q14UVQqBrdRcVyU3ikHAplNM3uxqRoOcTTlXM4jtf6fEgjpva 0PPJ/Ywdc1vHLxWcei/+n1f1T5MY4A/7Ce7cEubI1d6E+YSFV/r/VWspv9Bqno6B w7nrrp0fnE18GHfpBmRJ1LAsIYKqHIRA4O33ogIywiMZonk45AlbYYITZggjY2yU 2NBgGBteOW00h+RjmUvXXsQ/Zw+Qrf4JeYciNEbpBU/k+QcaFrVPfgZMM4n1ylXc SDtp3tShnlUq7g54Cr7q438G4ceLPEYQ7hNZ0ntHBW0rrZ//gwpfe/esACYWQZX4 hnlbOuNYhf2KtTyKtqpyc/OgADkCaB66Fp86817/s1Z9rYYPN8BMmbgwybKFmBV9 JfjMxg+7ML27N6+OtOGt =MbL+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Patch Pilot Report 20130702
Length at start: 40 https://code.launchpad.net/~utlemming/ubuntu/saucy/walinuxagent/udev.lp1188753/+merge/168804 - Uploaded https://code.launchpad.net/~yolanda.robla/ubuntu/saucy/bind9/server_banner/+merge/171513 - Queried back to proposer about one part of change. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/json-glib/+bug/1195056 - Synced https://code.launchpad.net/~yolanda.robla/ubuntu/saucy/ipxe/ftbfs/+merge/171754 - Requested that patch origin be documented - its from upstream but its not clear from either the changelog or the patch itself. - Branch updated; tested and uploaded. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/java-common/+bug/1195756 - Synced https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/heimdal/+bug/1191704 - Good start but patches need some work; pointed author towards the SRU process with some initial guidance and un-subbed sponsors. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/quantal/+source/liblockfile/+bug/1011477 https://code.launchpad.net/~gandelman-a/ubuntu/quantal/liblockfile/lp941968/+merge/171150 - Uploaded https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/saucy/efibootmgr/0.5.4-6ubuntu1/+merge/169572 - Checked with cjwatson on this one; OK to merge but should change into a sync as soon as his patch is accepted into Debian. - Uploaded https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pdfsam/+bug/1167469 - Checked this bug prior to reviewing patch; has already been fixed via a different route in Debian; marked invalid and thanked author for his work, explaining why it was not longer required. lp:~n-muench/ubuntu/precise/open-vm-tools/open-vm-tools.quantal-modules.backport - I started on this and got completely lost; I think this MP really illustrates the challenges of the hardware enablement kernels in 12.04 with regards to DKMS packages especially when there is no access to the upstream VCS to support cherry picking of fixes. In this case we might be best to actually push in a new upstream release of open-vm-tools and do some good testing on it - its probably lower risk. lp:~valavanisalex/ubuntu/saucy/inkscape/fix-1194855 - Uploaded Length at end: 32 -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer Debian Maintainer james.p...@ubuntu.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Patch Pilot Report 20130603
Queue length at start: 49 https://code.launchpad.net/~sdeziel/ubuntu/raring/openvpn/fix-for-lp1184223/+merge/165760 Fixed in saucy; security issue so pinged mdeslaur in -devel to check on current status. Security team will be picking security updates/sponsoring up as openvpn is in main. https://code.launchpad.net/~yolanda.robla/ubuntu/saucy/tgt/dep-8-tests/+merge/166078 Already merged; marked as done. https://code.launchpad.net/~yolanda.robla/ubuntu/saucy/freeradius/dep-8-tests/+merge/166215 Tested OK; uploaded and marked merged. https://code.launchpad.net/~sdeziel/ubuntu/raring/mysql-5.5/fix-for-lp1185573/+merge/166379 Re-targetted to saucy as not materially impacting shutdown of mysql. Uploaded. https://code.launchpad.net/~rtandy/ubuntu/saucy/openldap/lp1185908/+merge/166575 Already fixed in last merge from Unstable; marked accordingly and thanked submitter for their work. https://code.launchpad.net/~gandelman-a/ubuntu/saucy/cheetah/lp1183634/+merge/165520 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cheetah/+bug/1183634 Commented on associated bug report; python-markdown should really be MIR'ed. Commented on MP and marked WIP. https://code.launchpad.net/~lqs/ubuntu/precise/uwsgi/fix-for-1131314/+merge/152324 Still clogging up the queue - asked proposer again whether they intend on working on this and if not requested they withdraw the MP. https://code.launchpad.net/~le-businessman/ubuntu/raring/libcommoncpp2/fix-for-1176058/+merge/166377 Referred proposer to Marks comments on bug report re coordinating a security fix with upstream. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ddtp-ubuntu/+bug/1184952 Uploaded and submitted back to Debian as well. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xenomai/+bug/1186588 Needs a bit more work - added some comments to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/smartmontools/+bug/1091832 Synced. https://code.launchpad.net/~kip/ubuntu/raring/spamassassin/spamassassin-fix-1178826/+merge/166609 Branch broken and some history of dispute with upstream (now resolved). Asked proposer to re-base based on accepted upstream fix and pointed them at the packaging guide on how to work with branches. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-json-patch/+bug/1185739 Uploaded - and pinged zul about status of Python3 -> Debian. Queue length at end: 43 -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer Debian Maintainer james.p...@ubuntu.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Patch Pilot Report 20130325
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 https://code.launchpad.net/~fehwalker/ubuntu/precise/cobbler/lp1001846/+merge/151352 - Conflicts with fix for cobbler already in -proposed; informed MP proposer and asked them to rebase once the current inflight SRU have been accepted into -update. Also commented on the bug report to request SRU details. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uwsgi/+bug/1131314 https://code.launchpad.net/~lqs/ubuntu/precise/uwsgi/fix-for-1131314/+merge/152324 - This bug has been fixed a different way in raring and is suitable for SRU; commented on MP and pointed reporter at the patch in the raring package version. https://code.launchpad.net/~mitya57/ubuntu/raring/python-defaults/2.7.3-10ubuntu6/+merge/152592 - Out-of-date; and probably already merged from Debian; requested proposer review and withdraw/rebase as appropriate. https://code.launchpad.net/~xmacex/ubuntu/raring/modemmanager/ignore-arduino-lilypad-usb/+merge/152710 - Fix applied directly in-tree; pointed proposer (first fix) at the packaging documentation around how to fix issues using quilt etc and marked WIP. https://code.launchpad.net/~mitya57/ubuntu/precise/virtualbox/4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.3/+merge/153346 - LGTM; uploaded and commented on bug report associated with kernel 3.5 compatibility that 3.2 backwards compat should also be tested. Subscribed ubuntu-sru to both bug reports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lupin/+bug/670096 - Needs further work, unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors with an appropriate message. - -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer Debian Maintainer james.p...@ubuntu.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRUEIkAAoJEL/srsug59jDLi4QAJg+3Q/38oKHqlonLO9KEmii p0BA7AwY2zO0EJvDvzs/uyr7x0/2YS+76zGBVVnlhOadPGz3GO5u3Mc8yv5jbM7t ABv+lvt0kSun0S+/q4Jookvi9iUPPnWqAZcY40AbTWLqZWSAtHdsh3kj9Nb23nAx bW3wGNMfZMBIGhPskxLwXK7dmd7ZdK+qOLtGmnW86hQZj0jpWko+4IEc2q1yZNQw GNddY631Zes0xOPDwAIfL/8S/5Fq+8cmne1Nm9RQLPSO3e2mLnfhYU+ZdmfQcJcn DGrOCdsy71Z6w6cMIc0RTP3KcBSSYgyUaYNx4JBOnIL/26+KSeFSDJUcxxLyw1Dp GlNsRCi0khvzm7O/iNXvbFoYSKOmXV+H0Ff3xUny0/rppcFLb9JZoFyuKcTfhxZd O43NegVpZ85xouh78m6i3T+MkOY9u6okasZSnXZz2ku6VhaBHcJ986wmzH8p6C7s UFJo+MoqRTn5DsfZrWCieTMr4O6Q0ytWnAsEiAF+JU4IdgAXqCIFXwtagWemOcKh ffck9kD6tX5LANPZ6GWXuQlL1bjT+pFqbSyDU5pd4+ixxAOW08Ic6YHwkZPLl8VF NkLMdPOpPDFOw/UY4miUn0f9v/8dAXJvrpbtkSbdYOahm+BeK5g/UZ3YzM2cgZvI tbHATuoZKcQiw3WasznY =rqRj -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Patch Pilot Report: 20121207
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Start - Total requests: 57 End - Total requests: 43 lp:~louis-bouchard/ubuntu/precise/walinuxagent/walinuxagent-lp1079897 lp:~louis-bouchard/ubuntu/quantal/walinuxagent/walinuxagent-lp1079897 lp:~utlemming/ubuntu/raring/walinuxagent/vnetip_update - Marked as 'Merged' as already done. lp:~logan/ubuntu/raring/wpa/debian-merge lp:~logan/ubuntu/raring/gltron/debian-merge lp:~logan/ubuntu/raring/gtkterm/debian-merge lp:~logan/ubuntu/raring/clamsmtp/debian-merge lp:~logan/ubuntu/raring/smbldap-tools/debian-merge lp:~logan/ubuntu/raring/festival/debian-merge - Uploaded and marked merged. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pgbouncer/+bug/1083414 - Debdiff's for precise and oneiric - look OK. - Nothing todo for vanilla sponsors; needs security sponsors who are already subscribed. lp:~bkerensa/ubuntu/raring/drbd8/new-upstream-release - Need rework as new (but slight older version) already re-synced from Debian; added comments and marked WIP. - Official branch also out-of-date which is how this happened - emailed UDD for fixup. lp:~bkerensa/ubuntu/raring/iptables/new-upstream-version - In debian unstable; should be a merge; added comments to MP and marked WIP. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/doc-debian/+bug/1086940 - LGTM; uploaded. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/1074606 - Not ready for sponsoring yet; added comment, un-subbed sponsors and asked reporter to proposed merge from linked branch once fixed in raring (through sync from Debian). lp:~bkerensa/ubuntu/raring/fglrx-installer/depends-fix1 lp:~bkerensa/ubuntu/raring/fglrx-installer-updates/depends-fix1 - Updates for a restricted package; pinged tseliot who is going to pick these up next week. lp:~lqs/ubuntu/precise/tcc/tcc-fix-mmap-leak - Confused MP; might need to be targetted at raring OR it might be a bug in precise; explained the SRU process with links and asked proposer to re-consider what they wanted todo. lp:~psusi/ubuntu/raring/landscape-client/fix-memory-report - Change to landscape client code; also proposed upstream; commented that should be accepted upstream first and then released into Ubuntu. Marked WIP. - -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer Debian Maintainer james.p...@ubuntu.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQweQPAAoJEL/srsug59jDJ9IP/3wLxxrICKUNTgXXr9Q/d64j 05+o7RW6pwZDeCJhtHI9bpMzBbnuKlvdCexTPsDduMEIdO3m8Mc1fax+L98uydOP CS1G4mZcz7SfbyTnDFHlhTvGr0+qXhzef2FeqC0kOVPctzSAxRjp8crZDfqGW9d/ cn6aSY9dgCb6Bi8oTpFVcS4FJbQzDQKF88gUOmYNySqPsAlmIZ4NzggM+3IOmLzj VXCnz4zHwGivvQlv8seW9QQ1w46hx80JmFf/ciPNm4WnIpcTD3uEDip2xw95OrLF gn1cJPIr8cYK5cdglrd2i0+abv/OYXEGVvW205LNxKpEpjjxkuzHqCTQKlvDp8A5 a6l2oEXrnUzl2/bDEL//pj9VA+q0bNmn7Q/eNotJAmqSOcuIdKDg0hrviJenxvgF c7UXCBW5AIdEBSabXthaXekBBUgof3Ylu1vyWQt6spYdrej88/+y1k8hE/my+PvJ tKBqQdSP61/6XN/OTuaWHWB+8XHWAHzNX9fyRbHWVO8TLnnx1FrASZOCGvQqGI4B RzwOoPbuguEr00aGDxwgmbgjRYcSBCkWZT7oyUqDvMl/cNzBg5p+yPGRQRmjT2jM uTNztVV+ORwohmzCgMa047JCvsoDsgbc7tLVMazBwcgLOlqn59bUlv1ORJZKl6Cf zxw9orhZzZt9HA2aDH1m =dtZ9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Patch Pilot 20121005
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Notes from my pilot slot today: https://code.launchpad.net/~d06alexandrov/ubuntu/precise/netams/fix-for-mysql-load-data/+merge/118266 - No action required at this point in time; unable to mark WIP just like mterry https://code.launchpad.net/~gandelman-a/ubuntu/quantal/openvswitch/1.4.3/+merge/127537 - Marked 'Merged' - I already uploaded earlier in the week. https://code.launchpad.net/~abone/ubuntu/precise/console-setup/fix-433897/+merge/118886 - Delicate merge outside my area of knowledge; cjwatson on critical path for review so stood back. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zabbix/+bug/1047837 https://code.launchpad.net/~kampka/ubuntu/quantal/zabbix/upstart-support/+merge/124660 - Upstart migration looks OK but to close to quantal release for upload IMHO; provided feedback and said should be uploaded as soon as R opens. Un-subscribed sponsors from bug report as showing up twice. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwknop/+bug/1051958 https://code.launchpad.net/~kampka/ubuntu/quantal/fwknop/upstart-support/+merge/124683 - Un-subscribed sponsors from bug report as showing up twice - Upstart config does still need some work - provided feedback. - Defer until R opens. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quota/+bug/1044516 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quota/+bug/973663 https://bugs.launchpad.net/landscape-client/+bug/1053057 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-iscsi/+bug/1053306 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/978654 - No further sponsor action required - unsubscribing https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/w3c-linkchecker/+bug/1061379 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dotlrn/+bug/1061384 - Synched; Marked fix released once RT accepted. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1061244 - LGTM - tested locally and then uploaded; pending RT approval https://code.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu/precise/maas-enlist/subarch/+merge/126702 - Branch missing patch; pinging rbasak on irc who fixed things up... - But its already in the precise unapproved queue so stopped looking. - Marked WIP to get it off the review queue! https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdb/+bug/1036834 - Still pending a FFe ack. - BUT already uploaded to precise-proposed... commented as this is wonky IMHO https://code.launchpad.net/~scarneiro/ubuntu/quantal/jbossas4/fix-for-888943/+merge/125628 - Upload now accepted into quantal; marked as Merged. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache-mod-auth-mysql/+bug/1057946 - Minor confusion due to package rename - New feature which is not accepted upstream yet; provided feedback and targetted review for +2 months depending on upstream activity. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdb/+bug/1036834 - Already uploaded; un-subscribed sponsors. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsepol/+bug/1056975 - Uploaded to quantal; not uploaded to precise-proposed - Low priority for cross-build issue - queried whether this is really eligible for SRU, un-subscribed and pointed reporter at SRU process. Start: 69 End: 52 (plus uploads pending approval...) Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer Debian Maintainer james.p...@ubuntu.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQbuZ7AAoJEL/srsug59jD3kQP/3HFR07wiaqT/HOblYeE/X5G 53xV7XUWhXXsSmrZge03pYDacA5WtcHLpjBxMHCfb7Gkx4vPtuNSohKZZZ/zPcG0 zwDs5ZAUIa0hv9RJQcaaDClIkBsVbBd+pfeccuJGLvPcRzV+BCPXKJtTTro5m3Hk 9Minf/uZEC5TyQMsIesTW93jOjFJdnrsaTYMTAEcFupVxl715Ex+fu90Ta9EJ0Fy 99EsEdJG+SXdr68yC5xoh0Hx/HYYXrtu1EhvXMxfhnC9RhrYiigkPWa0duBhx092 ep6fIvy0e6mQo+qkqEeHxShl87F6QmAG+4MJXiKTIwHuNMzPWJ2g2F/LW8LZJkbK +qISXnbwWfi1l0B6NrS7f/loP84cNK0g5yLrvzT+5ZCc5N+FKbh+dBLwxZNcH/C6 rTEU/9Yg4o4kizIamohlVvGV0EtywtFTxUlMmKIjGkDriue6EwWNrVUS1e1l7+1w r6FR2mJjSGkkBSMS7/M0267ff8XJqLTJMP4+glCZ3+v+2jiqpzRQbAAc6Byp2dn6 Y/kp5ikrIQ85+w2W/M+ihwgwcoh1fW18FFER8zws1HIEUGVLdR9aHsCvXiURxZdw +Bj8Q0v/UtVY7y6WESL2NRNTBZj0TMk9VQAxXHpS7vDhltr4rqZUvFDT80T6z55j 3zh9wITiiRB4mhzAZw2e =pH30 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Call for Testing: Java Applications with OpenJDK7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi All For Quantal the default implementation of Java has been switched from OpenJDK 6 to OpenJDK 7 in-line with objectives agreed in [1]. This basically means that if you install default-[jdk|jre|jre-headless] or you install OpenJDK 6 and 7 then Ubuntu will prefer OpenJDK 7 by default. This is an important change as OpenJDK 7 is much more closely aligned with Oracle Java 7; performance and compatibility should be comparable on x86 based architectures. This change has been in place for some time now but as we approach Beta-2 it would be great if anyone who uses Java on a regular basis, either for development or to run applications, could do some more extended testing to ensure that this transition is still going nice and smoothly. If you find any problems please report bugs and tag with 'java7-regression-potential'. We still have a few outstanding FTBFS with OpenJDK 7 as default Java - see [2] if you have some time to help out. There are also have a large number of potential bytecode compatibility issues (packages which build with OpenJDK 7 but don't set the flags to ensure that the code built is compatible with Java 6 as well) - see [3] for the full list of impacted packages which when re-built exhibit this problem. I'm also in the progress of assessing the binary packages already in the archive for quantal which might already have this issue (which should be fixed as a priority). See [4] for more details on how to resolve both of these types of issues. Thanks in advance for any time you can spare either testing or fixing bugs. Cheers James [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-q-java7 [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=java7-ftbfs [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=java7-bytecode [4] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JavaTeam/Java7Default - -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer Debian Maintainer james.p...@ubuntu.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQXDtlAAoJEL/srsug59jDjw8QAKDQYnmIjU2CvRy9tVPCUtQn fMC7ULOOeosajsRVGLEBw0I2zMt+zbuVKOTPUw5DobNRaYOSQ79p1B3iC7nl4Ld3 MxaovKEvXWqGWXd+0shTxDf2tOOhMztYHBbz53Qjvar57Oa7Q15MYMyJIAt3UXsA 4SW2BBdE9MiqbDIrwhOX7rauXw+SesbjwK8D1avhbd7KgE2K0HSe7C+PPhxj3iMv 3lJW5yIf5qNvCrq9Mf/xpjID9E6GtGYXyndghHHFbouzkhHtdwPxm+9EgQDWEuUc clX173cQBDd7SpvJ206JghKGfFwUIYZ71xo41QwUC0r6E+l6ket+aid/VfKvqKcB tlh+w9EPKthl4IInVsNkzGXIX98zvX/T920u5+rh0ZGLYpB4nWjaFKSAHUh7Pmdw u8D7z9zMeDblT41wGrFKIcpdrPLQplr+kqAafzErT7lbivGmePeUamGg8SDE2q/R S5Qrp+SYOba84VWnd5w/9wcJJ+PBuIKlWawSRldpZUezVa9KqRhqDhaKq4tTXjIm WfvY0Tw0D9mxVQIKw0JTTkELpJEyUWkNXiBCNxNJvPnHm87+i+E0HEl7GY4G6g3M PyN3jd4RzUidTNHfFd9VzKhVpFTkuvYhJZYMPrVI+PPgn3oWG78OUmwwFKUehGqe 9SnS9KRhmSqPHOQrjVFO =BZLq -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Patch Pilot 20120907
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Notes from my session today. https://code.launchpad.net/~jfi/ubuntu/quantal/psensor/fix-LP1029065/+merge/117028 - Abandoned - marked WIP to get it off the sponsorship list. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cheese/+bug/981803 - Already uploaded to proposed - unsub-ed sponsors https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spamassassin/+bug/1040274 - Lots of bugfixes to merge - uploaded https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libquantum/+bug/1047380 - Built OK - enables hardening flags so worth picking - synced. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zgv/+bug/1047383 - Misc bugs and fixes - synced. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kde-gtk-config/+bug/1047387 - Need a merge, not a sync - explained to reporter and unsubscribed sponsors. https://code.launchpad.net/~respawneral/ubuntu/precise/java-gnome/java-gnome-fix-1043558/+merge/123232 - MP updated - but still need a bit more work - provided feedback. https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-dev-tools/gnupginterface-is-evil/+merge/122402 - Different approach agreed - marked WIP to remove from the sponsoring queue. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blktap-dkms/+bug/1028135 - New upstream release for compat with 3.5 kernel - proposed by upstream themselves which created some confusion as the packaging was quite different. Worked with Mike on IRC to get the correct release and uploaded a new version for ubuntu. EOD - -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer Debian Maintainer james.p...@ubuntu.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQSibsAAoJEL/srsug59jDfYMQAJ/TIjHModq6rKDqjTZwBoQO gvQaNCVHKnIizMqG/L+0ZgolTIJrCQOyO3QpEj2Z7p/3I7br+t5T5g73dcuTvmG+ q98EQGeT+9AY+X8PHdVMZEnVEUfRCHm2zH+FAlw+CUReKONt/4keARGecLLftG9w XrqMvXCPujD1h2iYwE7Sn9uHpbI0iSBcNrgXiB5zq1HTDH2unidImGRu3zSdSmkP WFbhMRAZQ4JLVY7NF5I8/JRxTV/ueaOSYL1PZMVSjyiwUZw+hrYa6L8+GP3wns8U S/hPw1NpqZ6XTQqDazZMqtjuRVDmDocYDo7jQxsuiebSUnFpQzYbygDAmVmEpdMJ 8TaIHCWxddOVQwqDKdFWgr7Ot8OkHStYbFSlhLhxXbGupceqLr0AKk+tsUYeeQMb KERQxYp0MIo85pNh4hLzNzAuqEc1hDQwnn4sIHgS//JaJTXLV2BljYsiTb3NjP7V WTi5RuyMQ3FGG2rAd/SJxUplR0XZgFdmSWAuEIkcYFk6dpIdA8RJCJPxSfMYhYMM AvP+gHo33l9cNcOti31mtzTSLH4N8xrANqa1AYpVz8LLNjCfgBr5T9+N24tHW7PR o5G7MvfE58/OoTroFjOtx9/huxyqEfVbnAj9rvJXhe40FFb7Tp4nwkLjCGQ/76ia LBARbxtvPUfIXj2d7aYT =ImvV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Patch Pilot - 20120813
My afternoon today https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-jenkinsapi/+bug/1035542 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/textedit.app/+bug/1035548 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zabbix/+bug/1035549 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-mingw-w64/+bug/1035550 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-tlwg/+bug/1035704 - Synced - thanks Logan! https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnote/+bug/1035464 - Synced https://code.launchpad.net/~gandelman-a/ubuntu/precise/openvswitch/ovs-ppc-ftbfs/+merge/116948 - Marked as merged - already in proposed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libav/+bug/937561 - Not really ready for sponsorship; unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cdk/+bug/280189 - New upstream release; Debian have already commited to VCS part of this update; further patch provided by upstream. I don't think we should jump ahead of Debian for this so suggested we park unless there is a really good reason to upgrade. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeglut/+bug/1035732 - Uploaded with minor tweaks to changelog. Cheers James -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer Debian Maintainer james.p...@ubuntu.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Patch Pilot Report 20120718
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Things I worked on today during my pilot slot: https://code.launchpad.net/~psusi/ubuntu/quantal/parted/fix-dmsync/+merge/111993 - Already uploaded - marked as merged. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnss-ldap/+bug/1020152 - Uploaded - discussed SRU requirement with fixer on IRC. https://code.launchpad.net/~scarneiro/ubuntu/quantal/proguard/fix-for-888982/+merge/114547 - Uploaded with a couple of tweaks; provided feedback to proposer. https://code.launchpad.net/~adrian-wilkins/ubuntu/precise/freemind/fix-file-association/+merge/114370 - Already uploaded - MP needs marking appropriately. https://code.launchpad.net/~gandelman-a/ubuntu/precise/openvswitch/update_key_bytes/+merge/115202 - Uploaded https://code.launchpad.net/~kroq-gar78/ubuntu/precise/activemq/sid-merge/+merge/114781 - Already uploaded; MP needs marking appropriately. https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/quantal/zsh-beta/debian-merge/+merge/115017 - Uploaded https://code.launchpad.net/~geoubuntu/ubuntu/quantal/gnomeradio/1013383+1018398+1019981/+merge/115054 - Uploaded https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/quantal/python-boto/new-upstream/+merge/115465 - New upstream release (OK) with some additional minor packaging changes which are not required; asked proposer to update minus the packaging changes; marked WIP. https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/quantal/python-bloomfilter/new-upstream/+merge/115464 - Uploaded; asked proposer to submit packaging changes back to Debian. https://code.launchpad.net/~jfi/ubuntu/quantal/psensor/new-upstream/+merge/114792 - Merge not fully documented - asked proposer to update and re-submit; marked WIP. Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer Debian Maintainer james.p...@ubuntu.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQBt21AAoJEL/srsug59jDKasP/3MMCcaNxjUGB98TfMST+5Fb 8Hpz9XUEDc+GnEnNNasd9qsqj6vTQYvHzrdM77v3fhOvOMmSK6oBHB/435XMw7H/ d92MM9tEdevSjRxcQpOSs6Opq3ovl8kvuANiIy9HXbhQI1DsbixmiGiCnvssa8SQ n95JnKXQo6addjMg2RTB+TxXHzID5ISjoPHrZD1ajVzfUfIu2h7crOXKVL81jm+l cw1THOMw28YZqfM+uFtQeMe2FzLFICxVDCvfIqdA2bNa/fcsUgyssW3PwlHQXyh+ CvEB79c6TCiNeGZ/itnnA5CAe0nXufRFH273dyWlV6ObUDhLhN0hov/eiXG9wUXZ Pz3UJDZCJzLjuTTz6RY/Rv/XFoNIOnodrnFE3vsTggG1huMzz+9ZPU5cmNrndUub qbf7Kah/SXFrZo2YVS4hGtJCLs5paiT4s+SiK7tkzkdWFSrUWCQG852Ny9XdvDk1 Om+iHSiP5bttWkzaNoh8pJxTOpBNAEwfUkZliYZSOvIatRY20YOEkXbjoJvPvxdF I7EaCDbZxBctLbUGEdei5W0+pIqylBc+LznU+/8Lw2oW/UlxgI4qfHeOmCu5ZqZQ +1Fd4XEpEDpzL+zgWydnuRML0NzvK2svsf+DIuDU5HjIKyadDP6Aissvax5MZPi+ /ct1Fbz5RVBc147Ecflf =sRCA -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Patch Pilot Report 20120615
Hi Daniel On 15/06/12 13:31, Daniel Holbach wrote: > On 15.06.2012 14:08, James Page wrote: >>> SRU's which have been uploaded but not accepted are hard to >>> differentiate on the report - they don't require any further >>> sponsor action so it would be good to be able to filter those >>> out if possible. > That's a good point. I usually set the bug to 'fix committed', > subscribe myself and unsubscribe ubuntu-sponsors, so I can follow > up if necessary. > > Maybe this could be clearer on > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/CodeReviews? I don't think this is a challenge with bugs (although it could be more explicit in the Code Review docs). Merge proposals create more of a challenge as I'm unable to set 'Fix Committed' in the same way so they just lurk around until they get 'Merged' which could take some time. Not sure we can do to much about that. -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer Debian Maintainer james.p...@ubuntu.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Patch Pilot Report 20120615
Report for my patch piloting today: https://code.launchpad.net/~veger/ubuntu/quantal/jsch/fix-for-803492-v2/+merge/104706 - Made minor tweak to OSGi manifest for new upstream release and uploaded. https://code.launchpad.net/~gandelman-a/ubuntu/precise/openldap/proposed-rebuild/+merge/104814 - Checked bug report for SRU details (now present). Changelog entry still needs to be more verbose and versioned Build-Depends in not present - provided further feedback to proposer. https://code.launchpad.net/~smoser/ubuntu/precise/tgt/lp977621-start-on-install/+merge/101321 - Already uploaded elsewhere - requested rejection of MP in -devel. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/989241 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/989242 - Pushed debdiff to the folsom-proposed branch that feeds the OpenStack CI environment and is the basis for the next archive upload. Unsubscribed Ubuntu Sponsors. https://code.launchpad.net/~takluyver/ubuntu/quantal/python-tz/merge-py3/+merge/105551 - Already uploaded - marked as 'Merged'. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/munin/+bug/598385 - Unsubscribed sponsors - nothing todo at this point in time. https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/quantal/keystone/fix-for-998991-and-new-upstream/+merge/109963 - Provided feedback to proposer about how new upstream releases of openstack components are managed by the server-dev team. Asked them to re-submit the branch as the bug fix is OK still. Marked WIP. https://code.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu/precise/modsecurity-apache/988819/+merge/109378 https://code.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu/precise/apache2/988819/+merge/109379 - Already uploaded to -proposed for SRU testing - not sure how to make these disappear from the sponsoring report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nss-pam-ldapd/+bug/951343 - Proposed merges for linked branches and un-subscribed sponsors from main bug. https://code.launchpad.net/~christopherarges/ubuntu/precise/nss-pam-ldapd/nss-pam-ldapd/+merge/110491 https://code.launchpad.net/~christopherarges/ubuntu/oneiric/nss-pam-ldapd/nss-pam-ldapd/+merge/110492 - Both merges lacking sufficient changelog detail and incorrect version numbers - provided feedback and set to WIP. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/redis/+bug/1009767 - Nothing for ubuntu-sponsors TODO - unsubscribed. Pending mentor upload in Debian. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvdpau/+bug/1010920 - Merged OK - uploaded https://code.launchpad.net/~gandelman-a/ubuntu/quantal/netcat-openbsd/merge/+merge/108072 - Already merged - marked appropriately. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libglib-perl/+bug/935525 - Removed task for precise - not appropriate; Reporter already asked to submit to Debian; unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors as no further action required. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/1003535 - Uploaded and synced from Debian already - marked 'Fix Released' with comment. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ginn/+bug/769959 - Uploaded https://code.launchpad.net/~geoubuntu/ubuntu/precise/gnomeradio/1004761/+merge/107506 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnomeradio/+bug/1004761 - Already uploaded to -proposed - added comment to bug report to re-iterate requirement for SRU documentation. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1004018 - Un-subscribed ubuntu-sponsors - no action currently required. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/biosdevname/+bug/1006565 - Checked with cjwatson this was OK (new upstream release) tested and uploaded. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logrotate/+bug/1011708 - Not actually a bug; responded to reporter and thanked the contributor for preparing the patch but its not required. https://code.launchpad.net/~kroq-gar78/ubuntu/precise/mod-proxy-html/fix-1005425/+merge/109766 - Added an extra comment about the apache2 change already in -proposed which enables this to be fixed. https://code.launchpad.net/~lars.duesing/ubuntu/quantal/aiccu/aiccu-1007408/+merge/110498 - Uploaded. Comment for the day: SRU's which have been uploaded but not accepted are hard to differentiate on the report - they don't require any further sponsor action so it would be good to be able to filter those out if possible. Cheers James -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer Debian Maintainer james.p...@ubuntu.com -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Quantal Java 7 Transition
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi All During the Quantal development cycle we will be transitioning as many Java packages as possible to OpenJDK 7 (see [0]). As Mathias highlighted during the opening of Quantal (see [1]), OpenJDK 7 is now used as default for packages depending on default-[jdk,jre,jre-headless] - so any packages that rely on default-jdk will automatically build with this new version of Java. Out of the 900 packages in the archive that build-depend on default-jdk, 90 currently FTBFS - see [2] (probably due to this switch but some may be caused by other issues - I have not reviewed all 90 build failures). I'll be working through these failures during this development cycle; it would be great if anyone who has some time could help out as well - see [3] for some help on fixing Java 7 FTBFS and how to report bugs back to Debian with the correct user tags so that the Debian Java team can pick them up. OpenJDK 6 will remain in the archive but will be pushed to universe in favour of OpenJDK 7 so can still be used as a last resort for anything that can't/won't be transitioned before release. Any help much appreciated. Cheers James [0] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-q-java7 [1] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2012-April/000955.html [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=java7-ftbfs [3] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JavaTeam/Java7Default - -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer Debian Maintainer james.p...@ubuntu.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPz1mSAAoJEL/srsug59jDsi8P/3xPqr07wwkHSSnwYwA0uNzN T9LdJu+tRXDXPtrw9ibwJS7y6zSTB8QjwnZ37s3mjHS4/T7dfF+HiGjPIqAu3S69 K3ba0H6vwLesEYDbej7fM6HXbbJdn2+DQICsjhhGfIqXMQOCx2c70PwmM6N3xLKY 2V1LPuO7IjY5fB4Y/BJqhQmUMChV4kFStbDMwo2ZkBm35x7hVqj8fj9MjJz9o49E skoJbg0O5nzcCEtX5sAiCY+ufdg9RWHXeYB3VKY1qHapWp8+gXhBD/usHXG9lCV5 xCMqco66lxXsMzCaeUS1yCQAOSXGfLwN866zUwtovfM3KDLRU1m/1HEDKTm8m4ai EIdTy7jlLDRDAQt6hlT5itoQ3L37m27PVd5iFEO5tVvQiEH86fh6p6hU6wK95EE+ D1q0nXAi/HEjQKIqEVVLt2wiuuI6y5QMJygKml5IjXdeSBjR4EELZP4egDTz4M5o HznvMUnWj4lbZt3skKkSCd5gf0rerM9wqMMEo70DUbal175Yt5z+OS1hA/gdLWLj FOqXv7IMGZaPGiLOl3EJzCJRKIQP68fLNy7tcPOhtCSxChMqxXaU3Ma4gx84bSWg PbLMJ+hTJM9yWNjepFTRm+IP1Y/+HF+UW9OLMByd9pEsw3rGYtaHpgFD89vI0zGX ZVRvzRHsmgQZqilVs1uY =/Z8C -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Patch Pilot Report 20120521
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/munin/+bug/598385 - Review revised patch for quantal and uploaded alongside bug https://pad.lv/1000678 - Nominated for 12.04 - SRU information needs more work. - Worked with vibhav to prepare SRU information + uploaded to precise-proposed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mosh/+bug/985981 - Re-based to version in quantal and uploaded. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cfitsio3/+bug/1001572 - Uploaded https://code.launchpad.net/~kroq-gar78/ubuntu/precise/activemq/sid-merge/+merge/106539 - Merge from Debian testing for SRU - not appropriate and not correct either so pointed the proposer at the SRU process with some general guidance - also commented in bug. https://code.launchpad.net/~kroq-gar78/ubuntu/quantal/activemq/sid-merge/+merge/106540 - Disapprove - package can now be synced from Debian testing - however it FTBFS due to the switch to openjdk-7 as default Java in Ubuntu only. - Synced the package instead with attribution to the proposer of this merge - FTBFS due to Java 7 can be dealt with ontop of latest Debian packaging changes. @pilot out Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPunb9AAoJEL/srsug59jDGEkP/icVhIsI1zloAJ1bUB1nIcVK QbYYs+8jP8qfBjKxYVfBqZwmLusNEVOcb1J/PguJivhKrO32T3eqnxbP5BFgoZIC 0R73l/ggTQeqBLWhhtxh9oRCgxEa3Jy65MRtLAm+piXbEtYF43TFs0dkMnnstVl2 V54upEgg9bi8OARMxOtltCUCe4qDZWhw47dhNO/WjBPJmYPr8tp+fJygRkOZtM7G 7unJ+gwDv4QEVhdRBjsWCawnzU0C8qlrg44qnoz9db4g/u8QXfCZJXI/OjGKk49E 2sSntIE3UNjCLlZOuLl8NoTskLquItPaN2/GiPZ0vanujM7TGWwHEdnadeZREMEU puELpr65HUkVdUq1fNGzVzmS864x1Jw3nDJI/dT5n00zR0ijxdfi/ObIol0aHy6+ xrxJsB9/PaBA/sq3nvUSHgyBZPR/oTrwolZVyeEd2Qn2sJxf4zYcyQ0pBTDfTiIC q/AHfwUmzqh+MJrxBcnAbKV5xk5ycvlvorjeQGJ55/lfa5GPEZblnWBae4P1Cyxz BYzkrq+xFxff5HZMNaIegO83QglSXO5vqi6Fs/8EVZORATp6izmbAAtbsR0KrZCV wM7agUzbdvpxPAsE5LDcWUWKK1e1D9+EAz3bCotw3rHdI3pn7puSJLHLIEr0c3/Q Zw3I/oO7kegWfkzkN+7F =ID3Z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: third test rebuild of precise pangolin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/04/12 15:08, Colin Watson wrote: > memcached (i386): I couldn't reproduce this locally. Perhaps the > server team could take a look. Racey test - http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=252 - I'll catchup with Clint to discuss. - -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPfHIQAAoJEL/srsug59jDc4kP/jRcfkuwA04DiM6xzgdi+zg+ esyw8NtpkoCrTaxmU9YhP3MrByfCJLj2m0U34udbF8VZkHJvxMxzzmVt+6F9KI02 zOt5PqXquE7OZaHe+fuUMWFC4GjL46VoWQ8RgD/42YkTGk6FiC3wA3qrvCrfWS4h B6PNPLEi4e7G1WqIcbQH42R3dBGRb+3KEmWeQ7W/sXAZNGVArBEza1Pj5Vx6lZKz knbPwwbg2fMAwHltKe9IAVs+2vVACwVZ04LihJAs5dYvVcYJwu9ONI0z54WsmlMZ 8hYjIOvhyPavLrxDUBxrv2psqNLcZAk2B7KLT6fxUv9gFgJlyDDSW7YDTgQaSL+k POoFcdU8r92CnOZITJJz8ocZ+XK75sXyQBa05XdABRh6SJc1V3WFUsgNUurJg7K5 ttTqzoIXqf+Oil1Aa0wrogqWTUZn8ft/FmrkHN6PVzgIO191+1Yx4nCiF8mw78Tr LU21mpMWVrJJzsrkolxzpQ65x5A6WBqPr+yvQD92Ehl7furqsmlIPCJIGKXFBGjb St7uZW/9hfmuxgT4+TIOHMiOtpTYBEXREOO5nXIOb0+Vlfe30xRIKFr+jRa4icb9 W93NsVaDB/iblMuV56O2JgiQnyEVRhtW/N7X/c/Ms/xj8qo3xeuLfpHnunozdlTU RXxuol4EWml5bcZIO9Co =OkVv -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Patch Pilot Report 20120316
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Here's what I got up to today: https://code.launchpad.net/~hggdh2/ubuntu/oneiric/cobbler/bug943000/+merge/95430 Tweaked patch tags slightly and uploaded to oneiric-proposed. https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/oneiric/distribute/oneiric-updates/+merge/94896 Already uploaded - MP was strange as it was proposing merging oneiric-updates into oneiric - fed back to proposer and asked them to delete the MP. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whois/+bug/943502 This bug report is a little confused as its unclear whether this is an SRU or a request for a backport. I've asked the reporter to confirm which is required and pointed him at the relevant processes. Unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors for the time being. https://code.launchpad.net/~dereknance-413/ubuntu/oneiric/klogshow/fix-for-678153/+merge/96059 Package not in the archive for oneiric - asked proposer to withdraw MP. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cortina/+bug/948914 Not yet ready for review - needs a FFe however it is handled. Unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors for the time being and asked reporter to resubscribe when ready. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/907152 Proposed changes to upstart configuration will break in some types of deployment - provided feedback on bug report, unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors and suggested that reporter propose a more appropriate fix against the ubuntu packaging branch owned by ubuntu-server-dev. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/puppet/+bug/950183 Covered by Merge Proposal - unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors. https://code.launchpad.net/~geoubuntu/ubuntu/precise/tvtime/tvtime.fix-372822+947845+947850+951473+more/+merge/96877 This one took sometime (its big); provided feedback on a couple of specific issues and generally expressed concern about the number of patches being carried for non-bug related trivial issues (compilation warnings, typos in debug messages etc) - recommended the proposer review. Marked 'Needs Fixing' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ebox/+bug/928501 Pending final fix from upstream packagers; FFe approved and archive-admin ready to review; I will pick up sponsoring the uploads when ready (as I have done most of the review to-date). Unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fdupes/+bug/460729 The original patch has been accepted upstream - however they have not yet released 1.60; thanked the contributor for his revised patch for precise but recommended that we wait for the upstream release as this is only a minor typo in the manpage. Unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs5/+bug/578536 Required updates have been made to the debdiff for natty and SRU details appeared to be in order - tweaked changelog to have a bit more detail and uploaded to natty-proposed. Unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnomeradio/+bug/954993 Covered by Merge Proposal also in the queue - Unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors. https://code.launchpad.net/~geoubuntu/ubuntu/precise/gnomeradio/gnomeradio.fix-954993+955462+more/+merge/97770 MP for above. Changelog needed work and patches had limited tagging. Provided feedback. This is a large set of patches outside my specific area of expertise so review from a dev who has more knowledge appreciated - I did check that it built! https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/athena-jot/+bug/804355 Changelog needed quite a bit of work and package has not been updated for a long time - provided feedback to reporter/contributor on what needs to be fixed. Turns out jot is not that random in some use cases. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glance/+bug/925609 Work already completed upstream by Chuck; thanked contributor for his work and explained that it would land in precise in the next few days when we do the next weekly release. Unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zanshin/+bug/956821 dholbach beat me to it https://code.launchpad.net/~talex5/ubuntu/precise/zeroinstall-injector/fix-for-953756/+merge/97807 Changelog and patch required some further work - queried whether it might be better to re-sync from Debian which now has version 1.6. That's me done for today (aside from landing the zentyal packages...) Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPYzOwAAoJEL/srsug59jDws0P/jUPXvaZsH0e8Qe2CmDJg3RB bfkThWI1Fx0HGwIE9uHT2LiBic33M7Jx2b6tTu3pw5n/UVrCscJJgFuaPfN2gya/ 8eDtjRu2HB3TUG+LUua3wb8NqdazCEN/QKRz6QdmP59zCyHqEyGCT+7gLhzFiZ08 ZSY0TY4JSC4MrklQJJWoTz9GVDpK295ipWFzLVbRQ4Skqblo5ENjODfyQbjvPLRU kDGgnEcwnHwljaW6hwQ8Gtz62VxyvD8lEyVFM5MNqhs5xiee0yG4elhLSBvWH6or DSKDe7GXWl/D1PcY5zdOwDUIpxGPdV57UXneXy/xLTofVbYJwyN5qOg8BpoylkET 0u
Patch Pilot Report 20122001
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Report from my piloting today: lp:~utlemming/ubuntu/precise/squid3/precise - - Already merged from Debian; commented on the MP and then deleted as no longer required. lp:~andrewsomething/ubuntu/precise/etckeeper/0.59ubuntu1 - - Uploaded https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jquery/+bug/913847 - - Uploaded https://code.launchpad.net/~n-muench/ubuntu/precise/open-vm-tools/open-vm-tools-precise.sid-merge1/+merge/88968 - - General looks OK; recommended a change to package version as the open-vm-tools packaging is really a fork from Debian ATM to felt use of 1ubuntu1 was inappropriate. https://code.launchpad.net/~psusi/ubuntu/precise/lm-sensors/merge/+merge/85044 - - Uploaded https://code.launchpad.net/~lynxman/ubuntu/precise/ipxe/newsnapshot/+merge/88329 - - changelog did not appear to reflect changes (some missing) and branch did not contain orig.tar.gz for new upstream snapshot; Provided feedback and marked 'Needs fixing'. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sshfs-fuse/+bug/918869 - - Built and tested OK locally; used syncpackage todo sponsored sync - w00t! That's me done for today. Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPGWrLAAoJEL/srsug59jDF2kP/A5X6q8ZfTPV8u6//aAWR0mt mK1ym0EMHKiZsmwGd2gSAZV8roSC/XPz81vTFPru0DZ3ja52nX4EINSNCnKl+SkX 5hp/O0lgjxc89SGD7kkzZoU2oBvVJkl+hmX28aX/Rv7NINCtmPhfX3umkMqVeyk7 BFEQmKuo3vyUSUCzstmlx3ThzHa4/tuOM8/9+Mx2q436TGABIOSexzmnx6bDv59z /iREIDcenFS8LKJOaBMIbrdh8PoIuN3ytd3F7829CH+iX8/lPEYebw+wr1kHaNF1 xztVWb3HeuVqf329mv19c5HwGjx2WvWRe/Dc707B4fOP1sv9AjZOIJ0CZePM1TY/ qLuuu/b8sq91hVxlSXDRb1ptn+OcFDlBVgYcBXUcXLuqIGZjuqemcKBw9ntkg7qf 1c5jxnDnM6MH3vzXZqMmLaSDy2+HGfUEvP5VtNRP1ct4b+SHK1jc/6oWCPCm2TUT NnsT0/iFdjZJK1p+NL3yH3oHD7s0hiOQ+ETaSUM691LdbIOp5/XbvPQlvYb/6gow ZEx8lSPK3PKD+B/YKTlU9tIoAY2J26Ds9BtACecM92BdPxYuz7JtIYE3jcPOvqwP /qBg01LNFMD2G6H0M/yzSx/nwYKCJr0G1KYAekSg/hzcpUg0bt7rIRRUk284BvFv P2KZ9Wr44vmKXYuvqXCZ =9Qx5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Patch Pilot Report 02/12/2011
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Only managed to touch four things today: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/659439 - Tidied up release nominations; as this bug has a simple workaround and could cause confusion/problems for some users marked as 'Won't fix' and un-subscribed ubuntu-sponsors. https://code.launchpad.net/~gandelman-a/ubuntu/lucid/cluster-agents/lp893352/+merge/83073 - Proposed merge looks good, associated bug has appropriate SRU information - uploaded to lucid-proposed. https://code.launchpad.net/~gandelman-a/ubuntu/precise/squid3/lp891445/+merge/82485 - Already uploaded - Marked 'Merged' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeimage/+bug/898845 - Issues applying provided debdiff as new upstream tarball had Windows formatted files; asked bug/patch reporter to look into this. Also queried what the current state of this package was in Debian (bug reporter appears to have stepped forward as maintainer) as pushing a new upstream release through that route would be preferable. Marking in-complete and un-subscribed ubuntu-sponsors until queries/issues with patch/encoding resolved. Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJO2Q39AAoJEL/srsug59jDXfIP/RhrJ5DNnc2jQbQpsZOiNZl7 fnaYJ4PzTbOm9JoRKoqX3QXW1DZVYCcD2Fr40+QrpvmbUDUlBVYQDLHb4dqQNs09 OSGAyeRHA0eGDghCbxOP6yhcx4KevDUap+T9NzdYYtbkXWJvGkZ42T9wK4QpEOga VHVC5qc+9H/DL1YF5n4CsPdj2vzLta26/kZqmJNbYSY5T8Bi4xqfEx/t7X0hNfrq tH+0PxLG/l/+z+OdaFvxVcd0D4FKrtKF9PkpKt0rohPKK7pkT0gPgASP4BoSCeVd E+Jwzx8MA46Dx1iWqgUmhu1ROV4j4iWUPAIXxRiHWrgFRIiH/jg/d6EAmijLeUCf 3taI7tCLmEgz4SIcmDCcpV+vLAqdR7R3sdgppvCbScPAFXtlWexunrVprwCOxpp7 S9cph7vMXpNJmJzYfYPjxYGxCqiQh8kIO23jZS1cL9rY8xoxPHKsBbwBQ2VFs8dS UtbIAB6hLEjAFZ/Vx5P6sSR7t4IQA+G6P2/4CQ3yN1DXuuYitH8BmmxFevey9fIc w6xnYygrdgXXAG/3QQuVI7o1Msr058nAqmeCK+oqGTgonQq6pSHRtW8bEmzjODvJ /LUn45X49LuR9ZwNn7MT6qteX6W11dV87X5BokJgb//LEMgylJFvpnuiLmHxCL7v 1Vv3Vz6IsYwl22+IgqNB =itTl -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Patch Pilot Report 2011-10-25
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 https://code.launchpad.net/~wibblymat/ubuntu/oneiric/couchdb/update-to-1.1.0/+merge/74236 Needs revising in light of new version of couchdb in Debian testing which should minimise the delta - commented with 'Needs Fixing' https://code.launchpad.net/~gandelman-a/ubuntu/maverick/facter/lp876130_lp732953/+merge/80275 https://code.launchpad.net/~gandelman-a/ubuntu/lucid/facter/lp876130_lp732953/+merge/80274 Both need to be based from -updates branch and take into account that this package is source format 1.0 - added comments+Needs Fixing https://code.launchpad.net/~gandelman-a/ubuntu/natty/facter/lp876130_lp732953/+merge/80276 Incorrect version numbering for -proposed in changelog; commented and marked 'Needs Fixing'; also confusion around applied patches in branch which although is not a specific issue is frustrating - added comments inc. explanation. https://code.launchpad.net/~gandelman-a/ubuntu/oneiric/facter/lp876130/+merge/80277 Needed minor update to version numbering of change; commented and marked 'Needs Fixing'. https://code.launchpad.net/~barry/ubuntu/precise/ubuntu-dev-tools/bug-881049/+merge/80253 Needs to be marked 'Rejected' as already fixed elsewhere. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ispell-et/+bug/871231 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/myspell-lv/+bug/871233 Marked 'Fix Released' as later versions already synced in precise. Queried whether these are going to need an SRU as well. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rus-ispell/+bug/871232 Version requested not yet in testing and has had a number of subsequent changes in Debian - recommended that we wait for it to land in testing and it will then auto-sync. Queried whether a SRU is required as well. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apcalc/+bug/880074 Build OK - synced from Debian testing. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libchewing/+bug/842115 https://code.launchpad.net/~chihchun/ubuntu/lucid/libchewing/bug-842115/+merge/74385 Bug and associated Merge Proposal need to follow SRU process; commented as appropriate on both, marked bug as 'Fix Released' in precise and raised tasks for Lucid->Oneiric. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/861656 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipxe/+bug/850154 Not ready for SRU into Oneiric yet - un-subscribed ubuntu-sponsors James - -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOpqlOAAoJEL/srsug59jDWQcP/RPDQL+rzyASYG1Tlmb4a9Iu je0gAU8VkDJ/UQ4AcLQhO3jnBmhV2lBLct1RMa3ni5AbpASasi8eTGIDH2Bz46sz YcCpCrpK969yvhewlCXgDblZcASvheD0U0TV2cylfDROlcVDMP8QvIWd+93w1okL R33Vrd0LpH3DXYgylCAamDV4+al9WfJ4pzQeVQbsODpwy0VXA4lI3fj4ZZnvlYXN trRaREVfEA9/sU76mh64CBnFcxKOslPqrCYBQ5j+/ipjjwb7v3J+8epAaJJipnZa IB7XTQqGQWFELNW/4/3Q0ltRuEuX4m8qNQWSZTm2NDuXrgSVc7EfADMzm4CqBa8V i5isPqthZO+5hWLjUU/lnVlZ1sl5agZZa2UYmTLHflbbUFrh9VMMfVMvJ7IVmFo0 docmmys4/KnATsCtblH5g4zIU4ojVoLpsFet4mt9Wic9mzCsBvkcCcAzFgh9vptk kEcn/NPtBEYJJnh+RlmejiewfesjdDUaTnkG1AAFTZQuuolhQW9tqf9vmgU2sfgq CYtbdLZMDU+NP58S85s3hoAmhM+ShPsmD/a+NW/vG0L57VZWcsgWS7OcvT2AK0YH 55LsG7QCTOSkl+fe8V3iD4MJu+eifIxwN6xP7+snkOPlNqZM7hxH4lYenJqVwz6Z 3xDBeu+JE4kBr12mIWka =wKQr -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Patch Pilot Report 20110927
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Pilot report from today. https://code.launchpad.net/~utlemming/ubuntu/oneiric/dovecot/oneiric/+merge/76101 Uploaded alongside fixes to actually make mail-stack-delivery work with new version of dovecot in Oneiric https://code.launchpad.net/~utlemming/ubuntu/oneiric/samba/oneiric/+merge/76117 https://code.launchpad.net/~utlemming/ubuntu/oneiric/eucalyptus/oneiric/+merge/76114 https://code.launchpad.net/~utlemming/ubuntu/oneiric/autofs5/oneiric/+merge/76120 Commented with recommendation that these should be delayed until P development - potential for high impact with these changes late in cycle as core services. https://code.launchpad.net/~utlemming/ubuntu/oneiric/munin/oneiric/+merge/76103 https://code.launchpad.net/~utlemming/ubuntu/oneiric/cobbler/oneiric/+merge/76106 Needs Fixing - requested that changelog entries be updated with information as to what the fix resolves as well as the detail of the change itself. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/munin/+bug/840386 Reviewed revised debdiff; Patches are all now well annotated (DEP-3) and make sense to me; debian/changelog entry requires some work as is a little confused and has missing merge aspect - comment added. Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu Server Developer -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOgcbLAAoJEJyvzxFWdG+VyQsH/2REPr79Z+VReAXPMMnUUvr9 8ZAZfZRx24WyHWsLxCjk2cEfVSdouEn6FH0FzYBnUHFCnTEtAkwUlo4jaqzEFa3Y MnYq6uHi+MTUd2hzSquZv5hHUQynNPZaAi62juVJDj3Wgcm8RZILkUtWDVAY90m1 hFruPHxu3U19uyBGXLaGYGMEpoYRfAopf3H2POzXTwdTuOPt01/oUxByGyR3Aitq qzM6py+mGb+8ja7kVyhit+kAtv7oGTgzgnUGLXXxNRQ8Iohrmhgi0wCiZGApzCQ6 +ypSwMXc+F/P4+24m3IPRyejM6hAwbRsnX+wKdwr1IpAu9Kw5qjmB5n4+NlQp6Q= =yPAU -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Patch Pilot Report 20110830
Notes from my first patch pilot slot on Tuesday this week. lp:~lynxman/ubuntu/oneiric/apache2/fixeddefaultsite Minor behavioural change to default apache2 virtualhost/site; does not actually resolve the associated bug and not really worth merging as increases the delta with Debian and changes default behaviour. Requested that this be reported against Apache2 in Debian, marked branch as disapproved and marked bug report as 'Opinion' as default handling of mod_rewrite configuration in VirtualHosts does merit more debate. lp:~peter-petrakis/ubuntu/lucid/multipath-tools/lp-641151 lp:~peter-petrakis/ubuntu/maverick/multipath-tools/lp-641151 lp:~peter-petrakis/ubuntu/natty/multipath-tools/lp-641151 Blocked by SRU already in -proposed for this package, updated bug report to document this and what will need to be done to the proposed branches when SRU process complete - all three branches marked as 'Needs Fixing' referring to linked bug. Cheers James -- James Page Ubuntu Server Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Using something better than Gobby for session notes at UDS
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 10:28 -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote: > I have made you an administrator of the ~etherpad team in Launchpad, > such that you can upload iterations of the etherpad packaging to the > ppa:etherpad/ppa. Feel free to add any other teams or individuals who > wants to help with this work. (Volunteers?) I've just uploaded a new version of the etherpad package to this PPA; it removes the majority of bundled Java dependencies (aside from a patched version of yuicompressor; ran out of time to look at this last night) and links to Java libraries in the main archive. I'll take a look at the final bundled dependency over the next few days. Cheers James -- James Page Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Team signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Using something better than Gobby for session notes at UDS
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 16:39 -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote: > It suffers from most the usual ailments endemic to large Java packages > in Debian/Ubuntu. The debconf could use a little bit of love. And > obviously the change from sunjdk -> openjdk needs a bit of testing. I > can do a complete review of the packaging as an Archive Admin and > publish my notes, if we want to consider it for inclusion in Universe > for Oneiric, but I haven't done so thus far. Hi Dustin I started to take a look at the bundled Java dependencies last week; it looked like all but 3 of them could be fulfilled through existing Java libraries in the archive. Happy to integrate this into the packaging - do you have a branch I can work against? > James, is this a reasonable starting point? And is there anyone out > there on ubuntu-devel@ who feels strongly enough about Etherpad/Gobby > to pick up this packaging/testing and take it from here? I would be up for this; the upstream build process is completely non-standard but we should be able to work it into something more maintainable. Cheers James -- James Page Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Team signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Server Team 20110405 meeting minutes
Hi, Here are the minutes of the server team meeting. They can also be found online with the irc logs here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/Server/20110405. Meeting Actions * Daviey to submit UDS-O topic for translations and docs * jamespage to helpout with verification of euca-dhcp bug * jamespage to discover process/location for fixing ubuntu server documentation Review ACTION points from previous meeting * Daviey to talk with wider docs team regarding translations (deferred, carry over) * Daviey to talk with docs team about new submissions (New documentation for cluster stack) * Daviey has discussed this with the documentation team; most Ubuntu documentation is facing the same issue that the server documentation set is (i.e. lack of resource). * [ACTION] Daviey actioned to raise a UDS-O topic to discuss server team documentation and the how this is taken forwards. * Daviey to post another followup one euca-dhcp bug. (carry over) * Progress on this issue; bug applied but needs verification. * [ACTION] jamespage to help out with verification that this issue is resolved. * SpamapS to put his version of ubuntuserver-minutes in directions for writing minutes * DONE * ALL: Please review the current documentation (for Natty release) * Some review; however team are unclear on how to fix documentation for the release. * [ACTION] jamespage to find out and report back/email. Natty Development Focus is now on bug fixing rather than development. * List of release bugs for server team: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=server-nrs * Looking OK. * Work Items for Beta-2: http://people.canonical.com/~platform/workitems/natty /canonical-server-ubuntu-11.04-beta-2.html * Looking OK. Daviey asked that any blockers, issues or concerns be raised as soon as possible in the run up to beta-2 Smoser raised two bugs that required MIR approval: * Launchpad bug 726572 in cloud-initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) "[MIR] cloud- initramfs-tools" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/726572 * Launchpad bug 727200 in lxc (Ubuntu Natty) "[MIR] lxcguest in main" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/727200 Ubuntu Server Team Events * SpamapS: Apr. 13,14 I will be at the MySQL Users' Conference in Santa Clara, CA * jamespage: I'll be attending puppet camp europe on the 28/29 April in Amsterdam * zul: Apr 25 - 29 I will be at the Openstack summit, Santa Clara, CA Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh) * Current investigating: * Launchpad bug 746751 in linux (Ubuntu) "kernel: [Firmware Bug]: the BIOS has corrupted hw-PMU resources (MSR 38d is 30)" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/746751 * Kernel SRU tests are throwing up security failures, compiler stracktraces etc... Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb) * Launchpad bug 634487 in linux (Ubuntu Natty) "t1.micro instance hangs when installing java" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/634487 * Latest natty works fine on smb test rig; however not in ec2. * The bug seems to be some interaction between xen hypervisor and the kernel. And it looks like newer Xen works. * Just need Amazon to upgrade. Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer) Not present Weekly Updates & Questions from the Ubuntu Community None Open Discussion None Announce next meeting date and time * Tuesday, April 12th 2011 16:00 UTC -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: Proposal for a JavaLibraryFreeze
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 11:37 +, Dave Walker wrote:
> I entirely agree that *something* needs to be done. Having been a
> victim of dependencies changing from under me, sometimes in a cascade,
> with my work on Eucalyptus last cycle - I wasted significant time trying
> to locate the issue, and also wasted valuable upstream time to help
> create a resolution.
>
> Currently, we don't have a notion of RFC'ing when developers want to
> modify (mainly sync / merge), and heavily relies upon interested parties
> being fortunate enough to 'see' the bug, before some pain is inflicted.
> One example of this was Bug #614981 [0]. This system, in my mind,
> doesn't scale.
>
> I would really like to hear James Page's thoughts on this subject, as he
> is undertaking some significant Java work this cycle in the server area.
I think that pushing a JavaLibraryFreeze as close as possible to the
DebianImportFreeze makes alot of sense as it gives a clear period of
stability prior to FeatureFreeze to ensure that dependent stacks can
resolve any integration/library issues that new versions of Java
libraries may cause; as Dave points out late sync's from Debian in the
Maverick cycle caused a-lot of pain which could potentially have been
avoided by taking this approach.
We should then take a FFe style approach post JavaLibraryFreeze to
ensure that any bugs/syncs/merge activity do not have significant impact
on dependent stacks; here's a starter for ten on when to reject a Java
Library update post this freeze point:
1) major version upgrade e.g. version 1.0.18 -> 2.0.xx
Should give some stability (but not guaranteed) for API
compatibility.
2) introduction of new dependencies implying new features
Reduces the risk that a main Java library starts pulling in
universe dependencies which would required MIR's; we had
examples of this in Maverick (see [1]) which where patched out
due to potential impact and lack of time.
3) potential for impact on key stacks such as Eucalyptus/UEC
Dave's referenced bug [0] is a good example where this was
picked up pro-actively and blocked for Maverick.
Some of these issues should be resolvable by having a specific focus
prior to the DebianImportFreeze (and JavaLibraryFreeze) on ensuring that
the key Java dependencies for core stacks are in a good state in terms
of upgrades/MIR's which should reduce the potential for having to go
through a JavaLibraryFreeze exception.
As my specific focus in Ubuntu is on Java libraries and stacks I'm happy
to pick-up coordination of this pre-freeze activity and act as a point
of reference for any freeze exceptions in terms of impact assessment
etc.
[0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614981
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552613
--
James Page
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Team
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
