Re: State of Sugar packages in Ubuntu

2012-09-10 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Daniel,

Daniel Holbach [2012-09-07 11:35 +0200]:
 Hello everybody,
 
 a couple of merge proposals for various packages of various versions of
 the Sugar toolkit were submitted and it looked like many of the packages
 had been removed from Debian for a while.
 
 After some discussion on #ubuntu-motu it became clear that for some
 reason they had not been removed from Ubuntu yet and these series were
 abandoned Upstream as well.
 
 Would it be possible to remove these packages?
 
 Packages I found in the sponsoring queue were: sugar-0.84, sugar-0.88,
 sugar-base-0.86, sugar-datastore-0.86, sugar-toolkit-0.86 but I assume
 there are more.

I saw the same yesterday during my sponsoring shift, and I removed all
packages for old sugar series (i. e. all  0.96).

Martin
-- 
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: State of Sugar packages in Ubuntu

2012-09-07 Thread Dan Chen
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Daniel Holbach
daniel.holb...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 Would it be possible to remove these packages?

 Packages I found in the sponsoring queue were: sugar-0.84, sugar-0.88,
 sugar-base-0.86, sugar-datastore-0.86, sugar-toolkit-0.86 but I assume
 there are more.

This proposal sounds reasonable. Last I chatted with Luke F, the
development platform had migrated to Fedora.

Best,
-Dan

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: State of Sugar packages in Ubuntu

2012-09-07 Thread Luke Faraone
On 7 September 2012 06:23, Dan Chen seven.st...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Daniel Holbach
 daniel.holb...@ubuntu.com wrote:
  Would it be possible to remove these packages?
 
  Packages I found in the sponsoring queue were: sugar-0.84, sugar-0.88,
  sugar-base-0.86, sugar-datastore-0.86, sugar-toolkit-0.86 but I assume
  there are more.


SGTM.


 This proposal sounds reasonable. Last I chatted with Luke F, the
 development platform had migrated to Fedora.


Iain Lane pinged me a while back about this packageset; I requested it when
I worked for Activity Central http://activitycentral.com in 2010 and was
working on bringing a number of AC developers on board working on porting
Sugar from Fedora.

The project was successful, insofar as Ubuntu 10.10 had a decent,
mostly-working Sugar stack. Unfortunately, Mozilla was changing the way
they provide support for xulrunner, so we weren't able to have a functional
Browse http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4024 since the
webkit-based Sugar browser was very immature.

Basically, Activity Central moved on, and the developers who would have
been candidates for joining the Sugar packageset uploaders moved on to
other projects.

The Debian OLPC team http://alioth.debian.org/projects/debian-olpc/ still
maintains Sugar, but under significantly reduced staffing.

-- 

Luke Faraone;; Debian  Ubuntu Developer; Sugar Labs; GMU 2014
lfaraone on irc.[freenode,oftc].net -- https://luke.wf/ohhello
PGP fprint: 5189 2A7D 16D0 49BB 046B  DC77 9732 5DD8 F9FD D506
-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel