Re: Print Dialog / Improving Print to file option

2012-08-20 Thread Lanoxx

  
  
Hi Timothy,

thank you for your answer. I did not know of these two bugs, but
they are both very interesting. I have opened a new bug in the mean
time, that is very similar to 542298, mine is 682129. And also
written a few patches already.

For your patch I would like to know which commit id it got in the
git master. Anyway I have commented to both bugs and attached
references to some other bugs that you might find interesting. Would
you be interessted to help with patches for bug #668529?

Best Regards
Sebastian

On 20/08/12 02:38, Timothy Arceri
  wrote:


  
I would like to know if the Print dialog that is used
  in Ubuntu, is 
  provided by a Gnome package or whether it is added by
  Ubuntu. 



This is part of GTK. You are looking in the right spot for
  the code, most of the filename generation is done in http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/tree/modules/printbackends/file/gtkprintbackendfile.c


You can see my patch in
  https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657322 as an
  example.


Also it looks like there is already a bug with the same
  sort of idea as you see:

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=542298



Tim Arceri



  
 
 From:
"ubuntu-devel-discuss-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com"
ubuntu-devel-discuss-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com
To:
ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com 
Sent:
Thursday, 16 August 2012 10:00 PM
Subject:
Ubuntu-devel-discuss Digest, Vol 69, Issue 14
   

Send Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list submissions to
 ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
 ubuntu-devel-discuss-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
 ubuntu-devel-discuss-ow...@lists.ubuntu.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
specific
than "Re: Contents of Ubuntu-devel-discuss digest..."


Today's Topics:

 1. Print Dialog / Improving "Print to file" option
(Lanoxx)
 2. Re: Print Dialog / Improving "Print to file" option
(Lanoxx)
 3. Re: Print Dialog / Improving "Print to file" option
(Dale Amon)


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:08:51 +0200
From: Lanoxx lan...@gmx.net
To: desktop-devel-l...@gnome.org,
 ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Print Dialog / Improving "Print to file" optionhttp://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/tree/modules/printbackends/file/gtkprintbackendfile.c
Message-ID: 502bad73.1080...@gmx.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Hi,

I would like to know if the Print dialog that is used in
Ubuntu, is 
provided by a Gnome package or whether it is added by
Ubuntu. In 
particular, there is a default printer option named Print to
File in 
Ubuntu, and when it is chosen, then one can print to PDF,
Postscript or 
SVG (at least in Inkscape). The problem with this dialog
makes saving 
the file unnecessary complicated, because on has to first
select the 
folder which normally requires at least 4 clicks:

1. click on the dropdown
2. click "other..."
3. Choose the folder (might require more clicks)
4. click open

Then the filename says output.pdf which any sane person will
probably 
want to change. So I have to type the file name and then
also add .pdf 
again and finally I can click "Print".

There are another two caveats here, first if I forget to add
".pdf" to 
the filename, then the file will be saved without the ".pdf"
extension. 
There is no logic to add it automatically. And second if I
had printed 
the document to a file before and now I want to save it

Why are there dependencies that aren't actually dependencies on some packages?

2012-08-20 Thread Jordon Bedwell
Since when does Brasero or other packages need/require
liblaunchpad-integration-common to work properly, or they will
suddenly fall to the ground and never work again.

I've noticed quite a few packages that require launchpad integration
when they don't actually need or require it, it's fine to have
launchpad integration, it is not fine to label it as a dependency (in
my eyes) when it is not, a recommend sure, a dependency, seriously?
Should the term spam be retooled to also include packages and their
dependencies now?

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss