Re: Dependency question

2020-07-01 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson

On 2020-07-01 20:52, David Ljung Madison wrote:

I'll take it up with Debian and/or see if I can take over maintaining
the package.


Please note Mattia's offer to sponsor it if you handle the package 
update yourself.


--
Rgds,

Gunnar Hjalmarsson
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj

--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Dependency question

2020-07-01 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 07:18:56PM +0200, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
> Your application is packaged in Debian, i.e. Ubuntu simply syncs it from the
> Debian repo.

And it seems like I was the one sponsoring the last upload some 4 years
ago.  umpf.

> I notice this bug: https://bugs.debian.org/908694
> 
> Unfortunately the Debian package maintainer seems to have stepped down, and
> nobody else has fixed the bug. As a result the album-data package is not
> available in Debian Buster and Ubuntu 20.04.

I just pinged the "maintainer" on IRC, but I have no idea what it'll
yield.

> So the Debian package needs a new maintainer. Or at least it needs some love
> by some Debian developer who helps out by dropping that dependency.

I could do that update, if it is really just dropping the dependency.
But unfortunately it's not:
https://sources.debian.org/src/album-data/4.05-7/debian/rules/#L68
i.e., it's removing an embedded js library.  Is it really fine for it to
embed said library…?  In Debian we don't particularly like embedded
libraries.  Also I'm not spotting immediatly that .js in the copyright
file, which is a RC bug by itself.

I don't have enough time to actually go and see what's really going on
there, but if somebody produces an update and tells me that's fine I
could be convinced to sponsor it.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Dependency question

2020-07-01 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson

Hi David!

On 2020-06-30 10:34, David Ljung Madison wrote:

I am the author of the 'album' and 'album-data' packages.

I distribute a 'deb' for the package as well as a tar for the data
package which someone (I'm not actually sure who) turns into an
ubuntu package.

For some reason they are adding an unnessary dependency:

% apt-cache show album-data
Depends: album, libjs-swfobject

There is no reason for this package to depend on libjs-swfobject, and
this is causing downstream distro's to not provide the package.

How can I get the dependencies updated properly?


Your application is packaged in Debian, i.e. Ubuntu simply syncs it from 
the Debian repo.


I notice this bug: https://bugs.debian.org/908694

Unfortunately the Debian package maintainer seems to have stepped down, 
and nobody else has fixed the bug. As a result the album-data package is 
not available in Debian Buster and Ubuntu 20.04.


So the Debian package needs a new maintainer. Or at least it needs some 
love by some Debian developer who helps out by dropping that dependency.


--
Gunnar Hjalmarsson
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj

--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: network-manager-fortisslvpn

2020-07-01 Thread Thomas Ward
Just to make a note here:

The patch you refer to was rejected.  The merge request to fix the
problem in another way, via
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/NetworkManager-fortisslvpn/-/merge_requests/15,
has been sitting for two months without any movement and has NOT been
accepted by Upstream yet.  Perhaps we need to wait for this issue to
actually be fixed upstream first?


Thomas


On 6/28/20 8:07 PM, Kolmar Kafran wrote:
> Hello Friends,
>
> There is a critical bug to the package network-manager-fortisslvpn
> which makes the package useless on Ubuntu 20.04:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-fortisslvpn/+bug/1879377.
> Can the package manager look into this so we can have it fixed on
> Focal? It seems there are patches already at
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/NetworkManager-fortisslvpn/-/merge_requests/13.
>
> Att,
> Kolmar Kafran
> üPor favor, considere a proteção ao meio ambiente antes de imprimir
> esse e-mail.
>
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Dependency question

2020-07-01 Thread David Ljung Madison
I am the author of the 'album' and 'album-data' packages.

I distribute a 'deb' for the package as well as a tar for the data package
 which someone (I'm not actually sure who) turns into an ubuntu package.

For some reason they are adding an unnessary dependency:

% apt-cache show album-data
Depends: album, libjs-swfobject

There is no reason for this package to depend on libjs-swfobject, and this
is causing downstream distro's to not provide the package.

How can I get the dependencies updated properly?

Thanks!

Dave

---
Dave Madison Stellarhttp://GetDave.com/415.341.
- It is now safe to turn off your computer. ---

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


network-manager-fortisslvpn

2020-07-01 Thread Kolmar Kafran
Hello Friends,

There is a critical bug to the package network-manager-fortisslvpn which
makes the package useless on Ubuntu 20.04:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-fortisslvpn/+bug/1879377.
Can the package manager look into this so we can have it fixed on Focal? It
seems there are patches already at
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/NetworkManager-fortisslvpn/-/merge_requests/13
.

Att,
Kolmar Kafran
ü Por favor, considere a proteção ao meio ambiente antes de imprimir esse
e-mail.
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss