Re: Ubuntu 19.10 Solid Color Background

2019-10-21 Thread Lindsay Haisley
On Sun, 2019-10-20 at 09:04 -0400, Edward Tazelaar wrote:
> I just upgraded to 19.10 and I can no longer change the background to
> a solid color. The only option to change the background is a picture.

If you create a 1x1 png of a color of your choice and use it as a
background you get the desired result, although the process is
definitely more cumbersome.

-- 
Lindsay Haisley   | "The only unchanging certainty
FMP Computer Services |is the certainty of change"
512-259-1190  |
http://www.fmp.com| - Ancient wisdom, all cultures


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: akonadi nor running after migration from kubuntu 18.04 to 19.10

2019-10-02 Thread Lindsay Haisley
On Sun, 2019-09-29 at 12:25 +0200, Daniel MOYNE wrote:
> Mysql running but akonadi does not start and shows the following error 
> message: Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket 
> '/run/user/1000/akonadi/default/mysql.socket' (2)

I'm not sure what the default is on this, and I'm no expert, however on
my Ubuntu server system the MySQL socket is
'/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' not
'/run/user/1000/akonadi/default/mysql.socket'. The UNIX socket on which
MySQL communicates is specified in /etc/mysql/my.cnf. Check the socket
location in any client configuration and make sure that it agrees with
the socket location created by the server.

-- 
Lindsay Haisley   | "The only unchanging certainty
FMP Computer Services |is the certainty of change"
512-259-1190  |
http://www.fmp.com| - Ancient wisdom, all cultures


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


bugs in php-xajax with PHP7

2019-06-20 Thread Lindsay Haisley
I just upgraded a server to Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. This version supplies
PHP7.0 leaving only a stub for PHP5.

I have a number of system web applications which use xajax, and the
package php-xajax v0.5-1ubuntu1 is offered with xenial, and is
installed.

The PHP code with this version of php-xajax contains a number of pass-
by-reference expressions, e.g. "$xuf =& new xajaxUserFunction($xuf);"
in xajax-core/xajax.inc.php (and other files). The use of the pass-by-
reference operator "=&" is disallowed in PHP7 for instantiating objects
and will generate a syntax error. Because objects are assigned by
reference anyway, the "&" may (must!) be omitted. 

I've fixed a bunch of these in several xajax files, which involves
turning on error_reporting in the proper places and going after these
errors one by one, but I doubt if I've gotten all of them.

When I get some time, I'll go through PHP files and post a unified
diff, but I'm pretty busy, so it may be a while. This must be fixed,
though, or php-xajax is unusable as-is with PHP7.

-- 
Lindsay Haisley   | "The only unchanging certainty
FMP Computer Services |is the certainty of change"
512-259-1190  |
http://www.fmp.com| - Ancient wisdom, all cultures

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Issue with courier-imap

2016-08-29 Thread Lindsay Haisley
Sam,

I've been having some problems with a recent version of the Evolution
MUA, as have a lot of other folks, and Milan Crha, one of the Gnome
maintainers of Evolution has been looking into it. I sent him a log
file from Evolution, and here's his response. This looks like a timing
issue, and since he asked me to let you know about it (since it _may_
be a courier-imap issue) I'm forwarding his comment on to you. The
conversation is at 

<https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=767564> 

I'm sending this on to you since the bug shows up when Evolution is
conversing with my courier-imap server at FMP, and Milan suggested I
bring you in on the discussion.

My guess is that this is an Evolution problem since others, on other
forums, report it with other IMAP servers, but I thought you might be
able to shed some light on it. Please direct replies to Milan, whose
address is in the CC, or at least CC him, so as to get me technically
out of the middle.

The version of the Courier imapd in use on this server is 4.9.1-
ubuntu4. I'm CCing Milan and the Ubuntu maintainer of the Courier
suite.

> Comment # 9 on bug 767564 from Milan Crha
> (In reply to Milan Crha from comment #7)
> > I suspect that the server has some connection-state cache and when one
> > connection knows about a newly received message, then another may not always
> > know about it, at least not until the client side of that connection asks
> > for an update.
> 
> I just verified it, by opening two connections to the server, opening the
> destination folder in one of them, then copying a message to that folder from
> the other connection. Asking for the message flags also returned no data.
> Simply invoking NOOP and then issuing the same FETCH command makes it work.
> Thus it's something on the server side and the fact that the server doesn't
> like quick connection "switching" (I do not know how to better name it, even
> it's not 'switching' in the usual meaning).
> 
> (In reply to fmouse from comment #8)
> > Sam Varshavchik of Double Precision is the developer
> > of courier-imap and is very forthcoming with information on all parts of the
> > Courier suite - if it matters.
> 
> Nice. Let him know about this bug report and my reproducer steps:
> 
> 1) open terminal A and connect to the IMAP server, issue commands:
>    A login user password
>    A select Inbox.sub
> 2) open terminal B and connect to the IMAP server, issue commands:
>    B login user password
>    B select inbox.sub2 // this is different folder than the connect A has
> 3) issue in terminal A:
>    A copy 1 inbox.sub2
>    * say it says the new UID of the copied message 1 is 2
> 4) issue in terminal B:
>    B UID FETCH 2 (RFC822.SIZE RFC822.HEADER FLAGS)
>    * nothing is returned (the server returns immediately:
>    "B OK FETCH completed."
>    without any data (I know this doesn't return message body, but it's only
>    a detail)
> 5) issue in terminal B:
>    B NOOP
>    B UID FETCH 2 (RFC822.SIZE RFC822.HEADER FLAGS)
> 
> Only now the headers are properly received. The NOOP also claimed here:
>    * 2 EXISTS
>    * 0 RECENT
>    B OK NOOP completed
> 
> From this I suspect the connection state on the server side was not updated
> after the copy, until the NOOP was issued. I do not know whether it's a bug on
> the server side, maybe not.

-- 
Lindsay Haisley   | "The first casualty when
FMP Computer Services | war comes is truth."
512-259-1190  |
http://www.fmp.com| -- Hiram W Johnson



-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss