Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-11 Thread Narcis Garcia 
Another idea (taken from Ubuntu-Mate presentation)
+ a variant.
Really dynamic.







El 11/07/15 a les 13:31, Patrik Bubák ha escrit:
> That's correct Tim, the G is formed by the combination of both U's.
> The symbol stands for both Ubuntu and GNOME at the same time,
> depending on how you look at it ;)
>
> On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 21:15 +1000, Tim wrote:
>> I thought the idea, was that the G was formed by the combination of the 2 
>> u's?
>>
>> On 11/07/15 18:38, Narcis Garcia wrote:
>> > I attach an idea to the letters aren't only "u+u", and have some of the 
>> > "G".
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I'm not a good drawing designer, but it's the idea.
>> >
>> >


-- 
Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-11 Thread Charlie Moss 
Thanks Alfredo.

Regards,

*Charlie*



On 11 July 2015 at 13:11, Alfredo Hernández 
wrote:

> :P Well, technically you could read the whole mailing list archive, but
> that would take a lifetime.
> No need to worry, we perfectly know this happens; we are always happy to
> inform about anything new members could've missed if needed.
>
> Cheers.
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 09:01, Charlie Moss  wrote:
>
>> Hi Alfredo,
>>
>> Thank you for letting me know.  How does a new person catch up on all UG
>> Stuff?  Is there timeline archive that I can read?
>>
>>
>> I'll have to start a site now with the initials UG so I use the logo...
>> LOL
>>
>>
>> *understanding-guerrillas.com *[image:
>> Inline images 1]
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> *Charlie*
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11 July 2015 at 12:45, Alfredo Hernández 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry Charlie, but you've lost months of discussion and legal problems.
>>> Using the GNOME foot is not something my team will do.
>>>
>>> And BTW, Tim using the GNOME font is alright, as it is accompanied by a
>>> variety of other elements (actually, IIRC, they were very explicit in
>>> making sure we used it).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Alfredo
>>> On 11 Jul 2015 5:17 am, "Charlie_UK ."  wrote:
>>>
 I thought this must have been discussed and concluded.

 Are there other contenders?  Is it still open to other designs?  Is
 there a deadline?



 Regards,

 *Charlie*



 On 11 July 2015 at 09:00, Prashant Matta  wrote:

> We have been through he no connection to Gnome discussion already. And
> yes, something apart from the footprint is anytime better to show our
> identity.
>
>
> - Prashant Matta
>
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Satyajit Sahoo <
> satyajit.ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In a standalone logo, when you show a GNOME footprint, it basically
>> screams GNOME, and the identity of Ubuntu GNOME is lost.
>>
>> Satyajit Sahoo
>> UX Designer
>> Behance Profile 
>>
>> We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? — The
>> Doctor, Season 5, Episode 13.
>>
>> On 11 July 2015 at 12:24, Charlie_UK . 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> If the symbol will never appear without the text, then what you say
>>> is true.  However, if the symbol part will also be *standalone*,
>>> which I would prefer then the footprint is very important.
>>>
>>> I'm new to the group, so have no knowledge of previous discussions.
>>> All I can say, from one user's perspective, is that the present logo is
>>> excellent. The footprint says 'gnome' and the circle says 'ubuntu'. I'm
>>> even planning of making myself a t-shirt with just the logo. Obviously,
>>> this just one person's subjective opinion.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> *Charlie*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11 July 2015 at 07:35, Satyajit Sahoo 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 The font used is in GNOME's, the colors are GNOME-ish, and the name
 itself has "GNOME". So there is already enough connections to GNOME, I
 think.

 Satyajit Sahoo
 UX Designer
 Behance Profile 

 We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? — The
 Doctor, Season 5, Episode 13.

 On 11 July 2015 at 11:58, Charlie_UK . 
 wrote:

> Not my cup of tea. IMHO, without some connection to the Gnome
> footprint, it's meaningless.
>
> Regards,
>
> *Charlie*
>
>
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 06:42, Andrés Muñiz Piniella <
> a75...@alumni.tecnun.es> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> Gentlemen,
>> >>
>>
>> And ladies!
>>
>>
>> >> of course, to hear your thoughts and comments.
>> >>
>> >> More on the project: http://on.be.net/1J8ezFh
>> >> See it in action: http://on.be.net/1FERsjc
>> >>
>>
>> Looks amazing!
>>
>> --
>> Richmond Makerlabs
>> Ham United Group
>>
>> --
>> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
>> Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
>>
>
>

>>>
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
>> Post to : ubuntugnome-artw...@lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>

 --
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
 Post to : ubuntugnome-artw...@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launch

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-11 Thread Alfredo Hernández 
:P Well, technically you could read the whole mailing list archive, but
that would take a lifetime.
No need to worry, we perfectly know this happens; we are always happy to
inform about anything new members could've missed if needed.

Cheers.

On 11 July 2015 at 09:01, Charlie Moss  wrote:

> Hi Alfredo,
>
> Thank you for letting me know.  How does a new person catch up on all UG
> Stuff?  Is there timeline archive that I can read?
>
>
> I'll have to start a site now with the initials UG so I use the logo... LOL
>
>
> *understanding-guerrillas.com *[image:
> Inline images 1]
>
> Regards,
>
> *Charlie*
>
>
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 12:45, Alfredo Hernández 
> wrote:
>
>> Sorry Charlie, but you've lost months of discussion and legal problems.
>> Using the GNOME foot is not something my team will do.
>>
>> And BTW, Tim using the GNOME font is alright, as it is accompanied by a
>> variety of other elements (actually, IIRC, they were very explicit in
>> making sure we used it).
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Alfredo
>> On 11 Jul 2015 5:17 am, "Charlie_UK ."  wrote:
>>
>>> I thought this must have been discussed and concluded.
>>>
>>> Are there other contenders?  Is it still open to other designs?  Is
>>> there a deadline?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> *Charlie*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11 July 2015 at 09:00, Prashant Matta  wrote:
>>>
 We have been through he no connection to Gnome discussion already. And
 yes, something apart from the footprint is anytime better to show our
 identity.


 - Prashant Matta

 On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Satyajit Sahoo <
 satyajit.ha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> In a standalone logo, when you show a GNOME footprint, it basically
> screams GNOME, and the identity of Ubuntu GNOME is lost.
>
> Satyajit Sahoo
> UX Designer
> Behance Profile 
>
> We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? — The
> Doctor, Season 5, Episode 13.
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 12:24, Charlie_UK . 
> wrote:
>
>> If the symbol will never appear without the text, then what you say
>> is true.  However, if the symbol part will also be *standalone*,
>> which I would prefer then the footprint is very important.
>>
>> I'm new to the group, so have no knowledge of previous discussions.
>> All I can say, from one user's perspective, is that the present logo is
>> excellent. The footprint says 'gnome' and the circle says 'ubuntu'. I'm
>> even planning of making myself a t-shirt with just the logo. Obviously,
>> this just one person's subjective opinion.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> *Charlie*
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11 July 2015 at 07:35, Satyajit Sahoo 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The font used is in GNOME's, the colors are GNOME-ish, and the name
>>> itself has "GNOME". So there is already enough connections to GNOME, I
>>> think.
>>>
>>> Satyajit Sahoo
>>> UX Designer
>>> Behance Profile 
>>>
>>> We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? — The
>>> Doctor, Season 5, Episode 13.
>>>
>>> On 11 July 2015 at 11:58, Charlie_UK . 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Not my cup of tea. IMHO, without some connection to the Gnome
 footprint, it's meaningless.

 Regards,

 *Charlie*



 On 11 July 2015 at 06:42, Andrés Muñiz Piniella <
 a75...@alumni.tecnun.es> wrote:

>
>
>
> >> Gentlemen,
> >>
>
> And ladies!
>
>
> >> of course, to hear your thoughts and comments.
> >>
> >> More on the project: http://on.be.net/1J8ezFh
> >> See it in action: http://on.be.net/1FERsjc
> >>
>
> Looks amazing!
>
> --
> Richmond Makerlabs
> Ham United Group
>
> --
> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
> Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
>


>>>
>>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
> Post to : ubuntugnome-artw...@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>

>>>
>>> --
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
>>> Post to : ubuntugnome-artw...@lists.launchpad.net
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
> Post to : ubuntugnome-artw...@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-11 Thread Charlie Moss 
Hi Alfredo,

Thank you for letting me know.  How does a new person catch up on all UG
Stuff?  Is there timeline archive that I can read?


I'll have to start a site now with the initials UG so I use the logo... LOL


*understanding-guerrillas.com *[image:
Inline images 1]

Regards,

*Charlie*



On 11 July 2015 at 12:45, Alfredo Hernández 
wrote:

> Sorry Charlie, but you've lost months of discussion and legal problems.
> Using the GNOME foot is not something my team will do.
>
> And BTW, Tim using the GNOME font is alright, as it is accompanied by a
> variety of other elements (actually, IIRC, they were very explicit in
> making sure we used it).
>
> Cheers,
> Alfredo
> On 11 Jul 2015 5:17 am, "Charlie_UK ."  wrote:
>
>> I thought this must have been discussed and concluded.
>>
>> Are there other contenders?  Is it still open to other designs?  Is there
>> a deadline?
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> *Charlie*
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11 July 2015 at 09:00, Prashant Matta  wrote:
>>
>>> We have been through he no connection to Gnome discussion already. And
>>> yes, something apart from the footprint is anytime better to show our
>>> identity.
>>>
>>>
>>> - Prashant Matta
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Satyajit Sahoo <
>>> satyajit.ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
 In a standalone logo, when you show a GNOME footprint, it basically
 screams GNOME, and the identity of Ubuntu GNOME is lost.

 Satyajit Sahoo
 UX Designer
 Behance Profile 

 We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? — The
 Doctor, Season 5, Episode 13.

 On 11 July 2015 at 12:24, Charlie_UK .  wrote:

> If the symbol will never appear without the text, then what you say is
> true.  However, if the symbol part will also be *standalone*, which I
> would prefer then the footprint is very important.
>
> I'm new to the group, so have no knowledge of previous discussions.
> All I can say, from one user's perspective, is that the present logo is
> excellent. The footprint says 'gnome' and the circle says 'ubuntu'. I'm
> even planning of making myself a t-shirt with just the logo. Obviously,
> this just one person's subjective opinion.
>
> Regards,
>
> *Charlie*
>
>
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 07:35, Satyajit Sahoo 
> wrote:
>
>> The font used is in GNOME's, the colors are GNOME-ish, and the name
>> itself has "GNOME". So there is already enough connections to GNOME, I
>> think.
>>
>> Satyajit Sahoo
>> UX Designer
>> Behance Profile 
>>
>> We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? — The
>> Doctor, Season 5, Episode 13.
>>
>> On 11 July 2015 at 11:58, Charlie_UK . 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Not my cup of tea. IMHO, without some connection to the Gnome
>>> footprint, it's meaningless.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> *Charlie*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11 July 2015 at 06:42, Andrés Muñiz Piniella <
>>> a75...@alumni.tecnun.es> wrote:
>>>



 >> Gentlemen,
 >>

 And ladies!


 >> of course, to hear your thoughts and comments.
 >>
 >> More on the project: http://on.be.net/1J8ezFh
 >> See it in action: http://on.be.net/1FERsjc
 >>

 Looks amazing!

 --
 Richmond Makerlabs
 Ham United Group

 --
 Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
 Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome

>>>
>>>
>>
>

 --
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
 Post to : ubuntugnome-artw...@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


>>>
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
>> Post to : ubuntugnome-artw...@lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
-- 
Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-11 Thread Alfredo Hernández 
Sorry Charlie, but you've lost months of discussion and legal problems.
Using the GNOME foot is not something my team will do.

And BTW, Tim using the GNOME font is alright, as it is accompanied by a
variety of other elements (actually, IIRC, they were very explicit in
making sure we used it).

Cheers,
Alfredo
On 11 Jul 2015 5:17 am, "Charlie_UK ."  wrote:

> I thought this must have been discussed and concluded.
>
> Are there other contenders?  Is it still open to other designs?  Is there
> a deadline?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> *Charlie*
>
>
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 09:00, Prashant Matta  wrote:
>
>> We have been through he no connection to Gnome discussion already. And
>> yes, something apart from the footprint is anytime better to show our
>> identity.
>>
>>
>> - Prashant Matta
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Satyajit Sahoo <
>> satyajit.ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In a standalone logo, when you show a GNOME footprint, it basically
>>> screams GNOME, and the identity of Ubuntu GNOME is lost.
>>>
>>> Satyajit Sahoo
>>> UX Designer
>>> Behance Profile 
>>>
>>> We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? — The
>>> Doctor, Season 5, Episode 13.
>>>
>>> On 11 July 2015 at 12:24, Charlie_UK .  wrote:
>>>
 If the symbol will never appear without the text, then what you say is
 true.  However, if the symbol part will also be *standalone*, which I
 would prefer then the footprint is very important.

 I'm new to the group, so have no knowledge of previous discussions. All
 I can say, from one user's perspective, is that the present logo is
 excellent. The footprint says 'gnome' and the circle says 'ubuntu'. I'm
 even planning of making myself a t-shirt with just the logo. Obviously,
 this just one person's subjective opinion.

 Regards,

 *Charlie*



 On 11 July 2015 at 07:35, Satyajit Sahoo 
 wrote:

> The font used is in GNOME's, the colors are GNOME-ish, and the name
> itself has "GNOME". So there is already enough connections to GNOME, I
> think.
>
> Satyajit Sahoo
> UX Designer
> Behance Profile 
>
> We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? — The
> Doctor, Season 5, Episode 13.
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 11:58, Charlie_UK . 
> wrote:
>
>> Not my cup of tea. IMHO, without some connection to the Gnome
>> footprint, it's meaningless.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> *Charlie*
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11 July 2015 at 06:42, Andrés Muñiz Piniella <
>> a75...@alumni.tecnun.es> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >> Gentlemen,
>>> >>
>>>
>>> And ladies!
>>>
>>>
>>> >> of course, to hear your thoughts and comments.
>>> >>
>>> >> More on the project: http://on.be.net/1J8ezFh
>>> >> See it in action: http://on.be.net/1FERsjc
>>> >>
>>>
>>> Looks amazing!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Richmond Makerlabs
>>> Ham United Group
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
>>> Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
>>>
>>
>>
>

>>>
>>> --
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
>>> Post to : ubuntugnome-artw...@lists.launchpad.net
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
> Post to : ubuntugnome-artw...@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
-- 
Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-11 Thread Patrik Bubák 
That's correct Tim, the G is formed by the combination of both U's. The
symbol stands for both Ubuntu and GNOME at the same time, depending on
how you look at it ;)

On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 21:15 +1000, Tim wrote:

> I thought the idea, was that the G was formed by the combination of the 2 u's?
> 
> On 11/07/15 18:38, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> > I attach an idea to the letters aren't only "u+u", and have some of the "G".
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm not a good drawing designer, but it's the idea.
> >
> >
> > El 11/07/15 a les 10:16, Charlie_UK . ha escrit:
> >> I thought this must have been discussed and concluded.
> >>
> >> Are there other contenders?  Is it still open to other designs?  Is there 
> >> a deadline?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> *
> >> *
> >> *Charlie*
> >>
> >>  
> >>
> >> On 11 July 2015 at 09:00, Prashant Matta  >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> We have been through he no connection to Gnome discussion already. And 
> >> yes, something apart from the footprint is anytime better to show
> >> our identity. 
> >>
> >>
> >> - Prashant Matta
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Satyajit Sahoo 
> >> mailto:satyajit.ha...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> In a standalone logo, when you show a GNOME footprint, it 
> >> basically screams GNOME, and the identity of Ubuntu GNOME is lost.
> >>
> >> Satyajit Sahoo
> >> UX Designer
> >> Behance Profile 
> >>
> >> We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? — The 
> >> Doctor, Season 5, Episode 13.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11 July 2015 at 12:24, Charlie_UK .  >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> If the symbol will never appear without the text, then what 
> >> you say is true.  However, if the symbol part will also be
> >> /standalone/, which I would prefer then the footprint is very 
> >> important.  
> >>
> >> I'm new to the group, so have no knowledge of previous 
> >> discussions. All I can say, from one user's perspective, is that the
> >> present logo is excellent. The footprint says 'gnome' and the 
> >> circle says 'ubuntu'. I'm even planning of making myself a t-shirt
> >> with just the logo. Obviously, this just one person's 
> >> subjective opinion.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> *
> >> *
> >> *Charlie*
> >>
> >>  
> >>
> >> On 11 July 2015 at 07:35, Satyajit Sahoo 
> >> mailto:satyajit.ha...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> The font used is in GNOME's, the colors are GNOME-ish, and 
> >> the name itself has "GNOME". So there is already enough
> >> connections to GNOME, I think.
> >>
> >> Satyajit Sahoo
> >> UX Designer
> >> Behance Profile 
> >>
> >> We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, 
> >> eh? — The Doctor, Season 5, Episode 13.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11 July 2015 at 11:58, Charlie_UK . 
> >> mailto:char...@charliemoss.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Not my cup of tea. IMHO, without some connection to 
> >> the Gnome footprint, it's meaningless.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> *
> >> *
> >> *Charlie*
> >>
> >>  
> >>
> >> On 11 July 2015 at 06:42, Andrés Muñiz Piniella 
> >> mailto:a75...@alumni.tecnun.es>> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >> Gentlemen,
> >> >>
> >>
> >> And ladies!
> >>
> >>
> >> >> of course, to hear your thoughts and comments.
> >> >>
> >> >> More on the project: http://on.be.net/1J8ezFh
> >> >> See it in action: http://on.be.net/1FERsjc
> >> >>
> >>
> >> Looks amazing!
> >>
> >> --
> >> Richmond Makerlabs
> >> Ham United Group
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
> >> Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com 
> >> 
> >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork 
> >> 
> >> Post to : ubuntugnome-artw...@lists.launchpad.net 
> >> 
> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork 
> >> 
> >> More help   : https://help.launchpad.ne

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-11 Thread Tim 
I thought the idea, was that the G was formed by the combination of the 2 u's?

On 11/07/15 18:38, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> I attach an idea to the letters aren't only "u+u", and have some of the "G".
>
>
>
> I'm not a good drawing designer, but it's the idea.
>
>
> El 11/07/15 a les 10:16, Charlie_UK . ha escrit:
>> I thought this must have been discussed and concluded.
>>
>> Are there other contenders?  Is it still open to other designs?  Is there a 
>> deadline?
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> *
>> *
>> *Charlie*
>>
>>  
>>
>> On 11 July 2015 at 09:00, Prashant Matta > > wrote:
>>
>> We have been through he no connection to Gnome discussion already. And 
>> yes, something apart from the footprint is anytime better to show
>> our identity. 
>>
>>
>> - Prashant Matta
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Satyajit Sahoo 
>> mailto:satyajit.ha...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> In a standalone logo, when you show a GNOME footprint, it basically 
>> screams GNOME, and the identity of Ubuntu GNOME is lost.
>>
>> Satyajit Sahoo
>> UX Designer
>> Behance Profile 
>>
>> We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? — The 
>> Doctor, Season 5, Episode 13.
>>
>>
>> On 11 July 2015 at 12:24, Charlie_UK . > > wrote:
>>
>> If the symbol will never appear without the text, then what you 
>> say is true.  However, if the symbol part will also be
>> /standalone/, which I would prefer then the footprint is very 
>> important.  
>>
>> I'm new to the group, so have no knowledge of previous 
>> discussions. All I can say, from one user's perspective, is that the
>> present logo is excellent. The footprint says 'gnome' and the 
>> circle says 'ubuntu'. I'm even planning of making myself a t-shirt
>> with just the logo. Obviously, this just one person's subjective 
>> opinion.
>>
>> Regards,
>> *
>> *
>> *Charlie*
>>
>>  
>>
>> On 11 July 2015 at 07:35, Satyajit Sahoo 
>> mailto:satyajit.ha...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> The font used is in GNOME's, the colors are GNOME-ish, and 
>> the name itself has "GNOME". So there is already enough
>> connections to GNOME, I think.
>>
>> Satyajit Sahoo
>> UX Designer
>> Behance Profile 
>>
>> We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? 
>> — The Doctor, Season 5, Episode 13.
>>
>>
>> On 11 July 2015 at 11:58, Charlie_UK . 
>> mailto:char...@charliemoss.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Not my cup of tea. IMHO, without some connection to the 
>> Gnome footprint, it's meaningless.
>>
>> Regards,
>> *
>> *
>> *Charlie*
>>
>>  
>>
>> On 11 July 2015 at 06:42, Andrés Muñiz Piniella 
>> mailto:a75...@alumni.tecnun.es>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> Gentlemen,
>> >>
>>
>> And ladies!
>>
>>
>> >> of course, to hear your thoughts and comments.
>> >>
>> >> More on the project: http://on.be.net/1J8ezFh
>> >> See it in action: http://on.be.net/1FERsjc
>> >>
>>
>> Looks amazing!
>>
>> --
>> Richmond Makerlabs
>> Ham United Group
>>
>> --
>> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
>> Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com 
>> 
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork 
>> 
>> Post to : ubuntugnome-artw...@lists.launchpad.net 
>> 
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork 
>> 
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>


-- 
Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-11 Thread Xen 
I did not mean to offend. I understand that you've gone to great  
lengths to come up with a design that fulfills all the requirements.  
If I may say so, the presentation material looks excellent and the  
'work in action' screenshots gave a great impression.


But most of all I agree with the motto in your sig ;-).


Quoting Patrik Bubák :

To everyone jumping into any subjective conclusions - you ought to   
consider some of the pressing facts:


Nothing from the original GNOME logo can be used as a standalone to   
point a user to Ubuntu GNOME. If you use the GNOME foot on its own   
without any text/wordmark you are directly pointing the user to   
GNOME, not Ubuntu GNOME - understand this before you say anything.


Those who want to keep the gnome foot in the logo - that is not   
going to happen any more. It means using somebody else's identity,   
which is a technical mistake and a violation at the same time. GNOME  
 gave us permission previously, but that doesn't last and doesn't   
clearly communicate us as a distribution, while all you see is the   
component (the GNOME desktop).


Using someone else's logo as your own is not the right way to go,   
because you're using somebody else's identity to identify yourself,   
which in most cases is illegal. Take it like somebody used Nike's   
logo in a roundel with just the colour changed. Do you really   
believe people wouldn't be confused? Would Nike like that? No.


When you modify somebody else's logo to suit yours you are directly   
violating some rights, hence modifying the GNOME foot anyhow didn't   
come as an option either and we had to make other choices.




To the newcomers to the game: first before mentioning anything   
consider, that we as the design team and me in particular as the   
logo author, had to go through a lot of thinking and research before  
 what was born as mutual agreement of an idea that would be the  
logo.  I had to make mainly decisions that would be right legally.  
To  please everyone's eye, which I know will never be possible  
because  there will always be a sense of nostalgia when a major  
change  occurs, is a difficult task and if we should listen to every  
single  "idea" we would never get anywhere, ever.




To quote: "

Another

logo for "gnome" is a 'thumb' or even a 'hat', a 'pipe', a

'toadstool', a 'tree' as long as it's something organic or natural."



- really? A thumb? That idea inclines more to Facebook than us.



- a hat? You mean Red Hat? Sorry, that idea has already been used by  
 a corporation backing Fedora and would be a cheap imitation.




- a pipe? I don't see how that anyhow directly points to us and it's  
 also something that changes the identity completely and might seem   
confusing, and a lot. Somehow you don't doubt that idea at all, but   
you doubt the current interpretation.




- a tree? I understand your "trying", but believe me, been there done that.



Now don't take this offensively, it's not meant to be, but shift   
into my shoes for a moment and understand that the decision I made   
is there for the right reason and every notion behind it is in place.





Nothing ruins creativity like too many voices weighing in. We call   
it the Ice Cream Principle. Tell 10 people to go get ice cream with   
one condition: they all have to agree on one flavour. That flavour   
is going to be chocolate or vanilla every time. Groups of people   
don't agree on what's cool or interesting, they agree on what's easy  
 to agree on.




 Original Message 
Subject: Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new   
logo by Patrik Bubak

Time (GMT): Jul 11 2015 09:36:55
From: l...@xenhideout.nl
To: ubuntu-gnome@lists.ubuntu.com

Perhaps the most obvious choice is Gnome logo + Ubuntu colours.

You cannot use the Ubuntu roundel without transforming the entire logo
into a combination, which Ubuntu does not allow. But if Gnome does not
allow standalone use of the Gnome logo, yeah..

Personally I feel this new roundel is devoid of significance (the
form). The colours are not Ubuntu and the logo is not Gnome. I like
the colour but the logo is very clinical, it might be the logo of some
medical technology supplier. I'm reminded of disinfection ;-).

Well good luck with it. I just feel Gnome is 90% of the identity of
Ubuntu Gnome, there are not many distributions that focus on a single
desktop exclusively, so Ubuntu is like the context (the
environment/frame) while Gnome is the essence (or interior). Another
logo for "gnome" is a 'thumb' or even a 'hat', a 'pipe', a
'toadstool', a 'tree' as long as it's something organic or natural.
Ubuntu Gnome - lots of little footprints together ;-).

A

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-11 Thread Charlie Moss 
I fully understand why the 'foot' should not be used.

I'm not clear if the new log design has been concluded, so here is my
design effort.  I heard recently that a Google study showed that people
relate more to logos that resemble faces. Also, I hope you can see the U &
G in the design.  Maybe the angle needs adjusting and/or the circle sizes.

[image: Inline images 1]

Regards,

*Charlie*



On 11 July 2015 at 10:36, Xen  wrote:

> Perhaps the most obvious choice is Gnome logo + Ubuntu colours.
>
> You cannot use the Ubuntu roundel without transforming the entire logo
> into a combination, which Ubuntu does not allow. But if Gnome does not
> allow standalone use of the Gnome logo, yeah..
>
> Personally I feel this new roundel is devoid of significance (the form).
> The colours are not Ubuntu and the logo is not Gnome. I like the colour but
> the logo is very clinical, it might be the logo of some medical technology
> supplier. I'm reminded of disinfection ;-).
>
> Well good luck with it. I just feel Gnome is 90% of the identity of Ubuntu
> Gnome, there are not many distributions that focus on a single desktop
> exclusively, so Ubuntu is like the context (the environment/frame) while
> Gnome is the essence (or interior). Another logo for "gnome" is a 'thumb'
> or even a 'hat', a 'pipe', a 'toadstool', a 'tree' as long as it's
> something organic or natural. Ubuntu Gnome - lots of little footprints
> together ;-).
>
> Anyway, good luck with it.
>
>
> Quoting Satyajit Sahoo :
>
>  In a standalone logo, when you show a GNOME footprint, it basically
>> screams
>> GNOME, and the identity of Ubuntu GNOME is lost.
>>
>> Satyajit Sahoo
>> UX Designer
>> Behance Profile 
>>
>> We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? ? The Doctor,
>> Season 5, Episode 13.
>>
>> On 11 July 2015 at 12:24, Charlie_UK .  wrote:
>>
>>  If the symbol will never appear without the text, then what you say is
>>> true.  However, if the symbol part will also be *standalone*, which I
>>> would prefer then the footprint is very important.
>>>
>>> I'm new to the group, so have no knowledge of previous discussions. All I
>>> can say, from one user's perspective, is that the present logo is
>>> excellent. The footprint says 'gnome' and the circle says 'ubuntu'. I'm
>>> even planning of making myself a t-shirt with just the logo. Obviously,
>>> this just one person's subjective opinion.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> *Charlie*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11 July 2015 at 07:35, Satyajit Sahoo 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  The font used is in GNOME's, the colors are GNOME-ish, and the name
 itself has "GNOME". So there is already enough connections to GNOME, I
 think.

 Satyajit Sahoo
 UX Designer
 Behance Profile 

 We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? ? The
 Doctor,
 Season 5, Episode 13.

 On 11 July 2015 at 11:58, Charlie_UK .  wrote:

  Not my cup of tea. IMHO, without some connection to the Gnome
> footprint,
> it's meaningless.
>
> Regards,
>
> *Charlie*
>
>
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 06:42, Andrés Muñiz Piniella <
> a75...@alumni.tecnun.es
> > wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>> >> Gentlemen,
>> >>
>>
>> And ladies!
>>
>>
>> >> of course, to hear your thoughts and comments.
>> >>
>> >> More on the project: http://on.be.net/1J8ezFh
>> >> See it in action: http://on.be.net/1FERsjc
>> >>
>>
>> Looks amazing!
>>
>> --
>> Richmond Makerlabs
>> Ham United Group
>>
>> --
>> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
>> Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
>>
>>
>
>

>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
> Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
>
-- 
Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-11 Thread Charlie Moss 
I fully understand why 'the foot' can no longer be used.

I have no idea if the new design selection has been concluded so here is my
design effort.

I remember hearing recently that a Google Study found that people relate
more to logos that look like a face.  I hope you can see U and G in the
design.


[image: Inline images 1]

Regards,

*Charlie*



On 11 July 2015 at 11:14, Patrik Bubák  wrote:

> To everyone jumping into any subjective conclusions - you ought to
> consider some of the pressing facts:
>
> Nothing from the original GNOME logo can be used as a standalone to point
> a user to *Ubuntu* GNOME. If you use the GNOME foot on its own without
> any text/wordmark you are directly pointing the user to GNOME, not Ubuntu
> GNOME - understand this before you say anything.
>
> Those who want to keep the gnome foot in the logo - that is not going to
> happen any more. It means using somebody else's identity, which is a
> technical mistake and a violation at the same time. GNOME gave us
> permission previously, but that doesn't last and doesn't clearly
> communicate us as a distribution, while all you see is the component (the
> GNOME desktop).
>
> Using someone else's logo as your own is not the right way to go, because
> you're using somebody else's identity to identify yourself, which in most
> cases is illegal. Take it like somebody used Nike's logo in a roundel with
> just the colour changed. Do you really believe people wouldn't be confused?
> Would Nike like that? No.
>
> When you modify somebody else's logo to suit yours you are directly
> violating some rights, hence modifying the GNOME foot anyhow didn't come as
> an option either and we had to make other choices.
>
> To the newcomers to the game: first before mentioning anything consider,
> that we as the design team and me in particular as the logo author, had to
> go through a lot of thinking and research before what was born as mutual
> agreement of an idea that would be the logo. I had to make mainly decisions
> that would be right legally. To please everyone's eye, which I know will
> never be possible because there will always be a sense of nostalgia when a
> major change occurs, is a difficult task and if we should listen to every
> single "idea" we would never get anywhere, ever.
>
> To quote: "
> Another
> logo for "gnome" is a 'thumb' or even a 'hat', a 'pipe', a
> 'toadstool', a 'tree' as long as it's something organic or natural."
>
> - really? A thumb? That idea inclines more to Facebook than us.
>
> - a hat? You mean Red Hat? Sorry, that idea has already been used by a
> corporation backing Fedora and would be a cheap imitation.
>
> - a pipe? I don't see how that anyhow directly points to us and it's also
> something that changes the identity completely and might seem confusing,
> and a lot. Somehow you don't doubt that idea at all, but you doubt the
> current interpretation.
>
> - a tree? I understand your "trying", but believe me, been there done that.
>
> Now don't take this offensively, it's not meant to be, but shift into my
> shoes for a moment and understand that the decision I made is there for the
> right reason and every notion behind it is in place.
>
> Nothing ruins creativity like too many voices weighing in. We call it the *Ice
> Cream Principle*. Tell 10 people to go get ice cream with one condition:
> they all have to agree on one flavour. That flavour is going to be
> chocolate or vanilla every time. Groups of people don't agree on what's
> cool or interesting, they agree on what's easy to agree on.
>
>  Original Message 
> Subject: Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo
> by Patrik Bubak
> Time (GMT): Jul 11 2015 09:36:55
> From: l...@xenhideout.nl
> To: ubuntu-gnome@lists.ubuntu.com
>
> Perhaps the most obvious choice is Gnome logo + Ubuntu colours.
>
> You cannot use the Ubuntu roundel without transforming the entire logo
> into a combination, which Ubuntu does not allow. But if Gnome does not
> allow standalone use of the Gnome logo, yeah..
>
> Personally I feel this new roundel is devoid of significance (the
> form). The colours are not Ubuntu and the logo is not Gnome. I like
> the colour but the logo is very clinical, it might be the logo of some
> medical technology supplier. I'm reminded of disinfection ;-).
>
> Well good luck with it. I just feel Gnome is 90% of the identity of
> Ubuntu Gnome, there are not many distributions that focus on a single
> desktop exclusively, so Ubuntu is like the context (the
>

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-11 Thread Patrik Bubák 
To everyone jumping into any subjective conclusions - you ought to consider 
some of the pressing facts:

Nothing from the original GNOME logo can be used as a standalone to point a 
user to Ubuntu GNOME. If you use the GNOME foot on its own without any 
text/wordmark you are directly pointing the user to GNOME, not Ubuntu GNOME - 
understand this before you say anything.

Those who want to keep the gnome foot in the logo - that is not going to happen 
any more. It means using somebody else's identity, which is a technical mistake 
and a violation at the same time. GNOME gave us permission previously, but that 
doesn't last and doesn't clearly communicate us as a distribution, while all 
you see is the component (the GNOME desktop).

Using someone else's logo as your own is not the right way to go, because 
you're using somebody else's identity to identify yourself, which in most cases 
is illegal. Take it like somebody used Nike's logo in a roundel with just the 
colour changed. Do you really believe people wouldn't be confused? Would Nike 
like that? No.

When you modify somebody else's logo to suit yours you are directly violating 
some rights, hence modifying the GNOME foot anyhow didn't come as an option 
either and we had to make other choices.



To the newcomers to the game: first before mentioning anything consider, that 
we as the design team and me in particular as the logo author, had to go 
through a lot of thinking and research before what was born as mutual agreement 
of an idea that would be the logo. I had to make mainly decisions that would be 
right legally. To please everyone's eye, which I know will never be possible 
because there will always be a sense of nostalgia when a major change occurs, 
is a difficult task and if we should listen to every single "idea" we would 
never get anywhere, ever.



To quote: "

Another

logo for "gnome" is a 'thumb' or even a 'hat', a 'pipe', a

'toadstool', a 'tree' as long as it's something organic or natural."



- really? A thumb? That idea inclines more to Facebook than us.



- a hat? You mean Red Hat? Sorry, that idea has already been used by a 
corporation backing Fedora and would be a cheap imitation.



- a pipe? I don't see how that anyhow directly points to us and it's also 
something that changes the identity completely and might seem confusing, and a 
lot. Somehow you don't doubt that idea at all, but you doubt the current 
interpretation.



- a tree? I understand your "trying", but believe me, been there done that.



Now don't take this offensively, it's not meant to be, but shift into my shoes 
for a moment and understand that the decision I made is there for the right 
reason and every notion behind it is in place.




Nothing ruins creativity like too many voices weighing in. We call it the Ice 
Cream Principle. Tell 10 people to go get ice cream with one condition: they 
all have to agree on one flavour. That flavour is going to be chocolate or 
vanilla every time. Groups of people don't agree on what's cool or interesting, 
they agree on what's easy to agree on.



 Original Message 
Subject: Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by 
Patrik Bubak
Time (GMT): Jul 11 2015 09:36:55
From: l...@xenhideout.nl
To: ubuntu-gnome@lists.ubuntu.com

Perhaps the most obvious choice is Gnome logo + Ubuntu colours.

You cannot use the Ubuntu roundel without transforming the entire logo
into a combination, which Ubuntu does not allow. But if Gnome does not
allow standalone use of the Gnome logo, yeah..

Personally I feel this new roundel is devoid of significance (the
form). The colours are not Ubuntu and the logo is not Gnome. I like
the colour but the logo is very clinical, it might be the logo of some
medical technology supplier. I'm reminded of disinfection ;-).

Well good luck with it. I just feel Gnome is 90% of the identity of
Ubuntu Gnome, there are not many distributions that focus on a single
desktop exclusively, so Ubuntu is like the context (the
environment/frame) while Gnome is the essence (or interior). Another
logo for "gnome" is a 'thumb' or even a 'hat', a 'pipe', a
'toadstool', a 'tree' as long as it's something organic or natural.
Ubuntu Gnome - lots of little footprints together ;-).

Anyway, good luck with it.


Quoting Satyajit Sahoo :

> In a standalone logo, when you show a GNOME footprint, it basically screams
> GNOME, and the identity of Ubuntu GNOME is lost.
>
> Satyajit Sahoo
> UX Designer
> Behance Profile <https://www.behance.net/satyajitha28c7>
>
> We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? ? The Doctor,
> Season 5, Episode 13.
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 12:24

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-11 Thread Xen 

Perhaps the most obvious choice is Gnome logo + Ubuntu colours.

You cannot use the Ubuntu roundel without transforming the entire logo  
into a combination, which Ubuntu does not allow. But if Gnome does not  
allow standalone use of the Gnome logo, yeah..


Personally I feel this new roundel is devoid of significance (the  
form). The colours are not Ubuntu and the logo is not Gnome. I like  
the colour but the logo is very clinical, it might be the logo of some  
medical technology supplier. I'm reminded of disinfection ;-).


Well good luck with it. I just feel Gnome is 90% of the identity of  
Ubuntu Gnome, there are not many distributions that focus on a single  
desktop exclusively, so Ubuntu is like the context (the  
environment/frame) while Gnome is the essence (or interior). Another  
logo for "gnome" is a 'thumb' or even a 'hat', a 'pipe', a  
'toadstool', a 'tree' as long as it's something organic or natural.  
Ubuntu Gnome - lots of little footprints together ;-).


Anyway, good luck with it.


Quoting Satyajit Sahoo :


In a standalone logo, when you show a GNOME footprint, it basically screams
GNOME, and the identity of Ubuntu GNOME is lost.

Satyajit Sahoo
UX Designer
Behance Profile 

We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? ? The Doctor,
Season 5, Episode 13.

On 11 July 2015 at 12:24, Charlie_UK .  wrote:


If the symbol will never appear without the text, then what you say is
true.  However, if the symbol part will also be *standalone*, which I
would prefer then the footprint is very important.

I'm new to the group, so have no knowledge of previous discussions. All I
can say, from one user's perspective, is that the present logo is
excellent. The footprint says 'gnome' and the circle says 'ubuntu'. I'm
even planning of making myself a t-shirt with just the logo. Obviously,
this just one person's subjective opinion.

Regards,

*Charlie*



On 11 July 2015 at 07:35, Satyajit Sahoo  wrote:


The font used is in GNOME's, the colors are GNOME-ish, and the name
itself has "GNOME". So there is already enough connections to GNOME, I
think.

Satyajit Sahoo
UX Designer
Behance Profile 

We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? ? The Doctor,
Season 5, Episode 13.

On 11 July 2015 at 11:58, Charlie_UK .  wrote:


Not my cup of tea. IMHO, without some connection to the Gnome footprint,
it's meaningless.

Regards,

*Charlie*



On 11 July 2015 at 06:42, Andrés Muñiz Piniella  wrote:





>> Gentlemen,
>>

And ladies!


>> of course, to hear your thoughts and comments.
>>
>> More on the project: http://on.be.net/1J8ezFh
>> See it in action: http://on.be.net/1FERsjc
>>

Looks amazing!

--
Richmond Makerlabs
Ham United Group

--
Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome














--
Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-11 Thread Narcis Garcia 
I attach an idea to the letters aren't only "u+u", and have some of the "G".



I'm not a good drawing designer, but it's the idea.


El 11/07/15 a les 10:16, Charlie_UK . ha escrit:
> I thought this must have been discussed and concluded.
>
> Are there other contenders?  Is it still open to other designs?  Is
> there a deadline?
>
>
>
> Regards,
> *
> *
> *Charlie*
>
>  
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 09:00, Prashant Matta  > wrote:
>
> We have been through he no connection to Gnome discussion already.
> And yes, something apart from the footprint is anytime better to
> show our identity. 
>
>
> - Prashant Matta
>
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Satyajit Sahoo
> mailto:satyajit.ha...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> In a standalone logo, when you show a GNOME footprint, it
> basically screams GNOME, and the identity of Ubuntu GNOME is lost.
>
> Satyajit Sahoo
> UX Designer
> Behance Profile 
>
> We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? —
> The Doctor, Season 5, Episode 13.
>
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 12:24, Charlie_UK .
> mailto:char...@charliemoss.com>> wrote:
>
> If the symbol will never appear without the text, then
> what you say is true.  However, if the symbol part will
> also be /standalone/, which I would prefer then the
> footprint is very important.  
>
> I'm new to the group, so have no knowledge of previous
> discussions. All I can say, from one user's perspective,
> is that the present logo is excellent. The footprint says
> 'gnome' and the circle says 'ubuntu'. I'm even planning of
> making myself a t-shirt with just the logo. Obviously,
> this just one person's subjective opinion.
>
> Regards,
> *
> *
> *Charlie*
>
>  
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 07:35, Satyajit Sahoo
>  > wrote:
>
> The font used is in GNOME's, the colors are GNOME-ish,
> and the name itself has "GNOME". So there is already
> enough connections to GNOME, I think.
>
> Satyajit Sahoo
> UX Designer
> Behance Profile 
>
> We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good
> one, eh? — The Doctor, Season 5, Episode 13.
>
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 11:58, Charlie_UK .
>  > wrote:
>
> Not my cup of tea. IMHO, without some connection
> to the Gnome footprint, it's meaningless.
>
> Regards,
> *
> *
> *Charlie*
>
>  
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 06:42, Andrés Muñiz Piniella
>  > wrote:
>
>
>
>
> >> Gentlemen,
> >>
>
> And ladies!
>
>
> >> of course, to hear your thoughts and comments.
> >>
> >> More on the project: http://on.be.net/1J8ezFh
> >> See it in action: http://on.be.net/1FERsjc
> >>
>
> Looks amazing!
>
> --
> Richmond Makerlabs
> Ham United Group
>
> --
> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
> Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
> 
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
> 
> Post to : ubuntugnome-artw...@lists.launchpad.net
> 
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
> 
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-11 Thread Charlie_UK . 
I thought this must have been discussed and concluded.

Are there other contenders?  Is it still open to other designs?  Is there a
deadline?



Regards,

*Charlie*



On 11 July 2015 at 09:00, Prashant Matta  wrote:

> We have been through he no connection to Gnome discussion already. And
> yes, something apart from the footprint is anytime better to show our
> identity.
>
>
> - Prashant Matta
>
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Satyajit Sahoo  > wrote:
>
>> In a standalone logo, when you show a GNOME footprint, it basically
>> screams GNOME, and the identity of Ubuntu GNOME is lost.
>>
>> Satyajit Sahoo
>> UX Designer
>> Behance Profile 
>>
>> We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? — The Doctor,
>> Season 5, Episode 13.
>>
>> On 11 July 2015 at 12:24, Charlie_UK .  wrote:
>>
>>> If the symbol will never appear without the text, then what you say is
>>> true.  However, if the symbol part will also be *standalone*, which I
>>> would prefer then the footprint is very important.
>>>
>>> I'm new to the group, so have no knowledge of previous discussions. All
>>> I can say, from one user's perspective, is that the present logo is
>>> excellent. The footprint says 'gnome' and the circle says 'ubuntu'. I'm
>>> even planning of making myself a t-shirt with just the logo. Obviously,
>>> this just one person's subjective opinion.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> *Charlie*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11 July 2015 at 07:35, Satyajit Sahoo 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 The font used is in GNOME's, the colors are GNOME-ish, and the name
 itself has "GNOME". So there is already enough connections to GNOME, I
 think.

 Satyajit Sahoo
 UX Designer
 Behance Profile 

 We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? — The
 Doctor, Season 5, Episode 13.

 On 11 July 2015 at 11:58, Charlie_UK .  wrote:

> Not my cup of tea. IMHO, without some connection to the Gnome
> footprint, it's meaningless.
>
> Regards,
>
> *Charlie*
>
>
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 06:42, Andrés Muñiz Piniella <
> a75...@alumni.tecnun.es> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> Gentlemen,
>> >>
>>
>> And ladies!
>>
>>
>> >> of course, to hear your thoughts and comments.
>> >>
>> >> More on the project: http://on.be.net/1J8ezFh
>> >> See it in action: http://on.be.net/1FERsjc
>> >>
>>
>> Looks amazing!
>>
>> --
>> Richmond Makerlabs
>> Ham United Group
>>
>> --
>> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
>> Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
>>
>
>

>>>
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
>> Post to : ubuntugnome-artw...@lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>
-- 
Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-11 Thread Prashant Matta 
We have been through he no connection to Gnome discussion already. And yes,
something apart from the footprint is anytime better to show our identity.


- Prashant Matta

On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Satyajit Sahoo 
wrote:

> In a standalone logo, when you show a GNOME footprint, it basically
> screams GNOME, and the identity of Ubuntu GNOME is lost.
>
> Satyajit Sahoo
> UX Designer
> Behance Profile 
>
> We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? — The Doctor,
> Season 5, Episode 13.
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 12:24, Charlie_UK .  wrote:
>
>> If the symbol will never appear without the text, then what you say is
>> true.  However, if the symbol part will also be *standalone*, which I
>> would prefer then the footprint is very important.
>>
>> I'm new to the group, so have no knowledge of previous discussions. All I
>> can say, from one user's perspective, is that the present logo is
>> excellent. The footprint says 'gnome' and the circle says 'ubuntu'. I'm
>> even planning of making myself a t-shirt with just the logo. Obviously,
>> this just one person's subjective opinion.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> *Charlie*
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11 July 2015 at 07:35, Satyajit Sahoo 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The font used is in GNOME's, the colors are GNOME-ish, and the name
>>> itself has "GNOME". So there is already enough connections to GNOME, I
>>> think.
>>>
>>> Satyajit Sahoo
>>> UX Designer
>>> Behance Profile 
>>>
>>> We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? — The
>>> Doctor, Season 5, Episode 13.
>>>
>>> On 11 July 2015 at 11:58, Charlie_UK .  wrote:
>>>
 Not my cup of tea. IMHO, without some connection to the Gnome
 footprint, it's meaningless.

 Regards,

 *Charlie*



 On 11 July 2015 at 06:42, Andrés Muñiz Piniella <
 a75...@alumni.tecnun.es> wrote:

>
>
>
> >> Gentlemen,
> >>
>
> And ladies!
>
>
> >> of course, to hear your thoughts and comments.
> >>
> >> More on the project: http://on.be.net/1J8ezFh
> >> See it in action: http://on.be.net/1FERsjc
> >>
>
> Looks amazing!
>
> --
> Richmond Makerlabs
> Ham United Group
>
> --
> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
> Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
>


>>>
>>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
> Post to : ubuntugnome-artw...@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
-- 
Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-11 Thread Satyajit Sahoo 
In a standalone logo, when you show a GNOME footprint, it basically screams
GNOME, and the identity of Ubuntu GNOME is lost.

Satyajit Sahoo
UX Designer
Behance Profile 

We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? — The Doctor,
Season 5, Episode 13.

On 11 July 2015 at 12:24, Charlie_UK .  wrote:

> If the symbol will never appear without the text, then what you say is
> true.  However, if the symbol part will also be *standalone*, which I
> would prefer then the footprint is very important.
>
> I'm new to the group, so have no knowledge of previous discussions. All I
> can say, from one user's perspective, is that the present logo is
> excellent. The footprint says 'gnome' and the circle says 'ubuntu'. I'm
> even planning of making myself a t-shirt with just the logo. Obviously,
> this just one person's subjective opinion.
>
> Regards,
>
> *Charlie*
>
>
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 07:35, Satyajit Sahoo  wrote:
>
>> The font used is in GNOME's, the colors are GNOME-ish, and the name
>> itself has "GNOME". So there is already enough connections to GNOME, I
>> think.
>>
>> Satyajit Sahoo
>> UX Designer
>> Behance Profile 
>>
>> We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? — The Doctor,
>> Season 5, Episode 13.
>>
>> On 11 July 2015 at 11:58, Charlie_UK .  wrote:
>>
>>> Not my cup of tea. IMHO, without some connection to the Gnome footprint,
>>> it's meaningless.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> *Charlie*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11 July 2015 at 06:42, Andrés Muñiz Piniella >> > wrote:
>>>



 >> Gentlemen,
 >>

 And ladies!


 >> of course, to hear your thoughts and comments.
 >>
 >> More on the project: http://on.be.net/1J8ezFh
 >> See it in action: http://on.be.net/1FERsjc
 >>

 Looks amazing!

 --
 Richmond Makerlabs
 Ham United Group

 --
 Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
 Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome

>>>
>>>
>>
>
-- 
Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-11 Thread Tim 


On 11/07/15 16:35, Satyajit Sahoo wrote:
> The font used is in GNOME's, the colors are GNOME-ish, and the name itself 
> has "GNOME". So there is already enough connections to GNOME, I think.
Its not the same font as used in the official GNOME logos, that may cause 
issues, but see what the GNOME foundation has to say.
>
> Satyajit Sahoo
> UX Designer
> Behance Profile 
>
> We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? — The Doctor, 
> Season 5, Episode 13.
>
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 11:58, Charlie_UK .  > wrote:
>
> Not my cup of tea. IMHO, without some connection to the Gnome footprint, 
> it's meaningless.
>
> Regards,
> *
> *
> *Charlie*
>
>  
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 06:42, Andrés Muñiz Piniella  > wrote:
>
>
>
>
> >> Gentlemen,
> >>
>
> And ladies!
>
>
> >> of course, to hear your thoughts and comments.
> >>
> >> More on the project: http://on.be.net/1J8ezFh
> >> See it in action: http://on.be.net/1FERsjc
> >>
>
> Looks amazing!
>
> --
> Richmond Makerlabs
> Ham United Group
>
> --
> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
> Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com 
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-10 Thread Tim 


On 11/07/15 16:54, Charlie_UK . wrote:
> If the symbol will never appear without the text, then what you say is true.  
> However, if the symbol part will also be /standalone/, which I
> would prefer then the footprint is very important.  
>
> I'm new to the group, so have no knowledge of previous discussions. All I can 
> say, from one user's perspective, is that the present logo is
> excellent. The footprint says 'gnome' and the circle says 'ubuntu'. I'm even 
> planning of making myself a t-shirt with just the logo.
> Obviously, this just one person's subjective opinion.
That is exactly the problem, we can't use the existing GNOME foot roundel 
standalone,  only in the full logo...
>
> Regards,
> *
> *
> *Charlie*
>
>  
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 07:35, Satyajit Sahoo  > wrote:
>
> The font used is in GNOME's, the colors are GNOME-ish, and the name 
> itself has "GNOME". So there is already enough connections to GNOME, I
> think.
>
> Satyajit Sahoo
> UX Designer
> Behance Profile 
>
> We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? — The Doctor, 
> Season 5, Episode 13.
>
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 11:58, Charlie_UK .  > wrote:
>
> Not my cup of tea. IMHO, without some connection to the Gnome 
> footprint, it's meaningless.
>
> Regards,
> *
> *
> *Charlie*
>
>  
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 06:42, Andrés Muñiz Piniella 
> mailto:a75...@alumni.tecnun.es>> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> >> Gentlemen,
> >>
>
> 44And ladies!
>
>
> >> of course, to hear your thoughts and comments.
> >>
> >> More on the project: http://on.be.net/1J8ezFh
> >> See it in action: http://on.be.net/1FERsjc
> >>
>
> Looks amazing!
>
> --
> Richmond Makerlabs
> Ham United Group
>
> --
> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
> Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com 
> 
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-10 Thread Charlie_UK . 
If the symbol will never appear without the text, then what you say is
true.  However, if the symbol part will also be *standalone*, which I would
prefer then the footprint is very important.

I'm new to the group, so have no knowledge of previous discussions. All I
can say, from one user's perspective, is that the present logo is
excellent. The footprint says 'gnome' and the circle says 'ubuntu'. I'm
even planning of making myself a t-shirt with just the logo. Obviously,
this just one person's subjective opinion.

Regards,

*Charlie*



On 11 July 2015 at 07:35, Satyajit Sahoo  wrote:

> The font used is in GNOME's, the colors are GNOME-ish, and the name itself
> has "GNOME". So there is already enough connections to GNOME, I think.
>
> Satyajit Sahoo
> UX Designer
> Behance Profile 
>
> We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? — The Doctor,
> Season 5, Episode 13.
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 11:58, Charlie_UK .  wrote:
>
>> Not my cup of tea. IMHO, without some connection to the Gnome footprint,
>> it's meaningless.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> *Charlie*
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11 July 2015 at 06:42, Andrés Muñiz Piniella 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >> Gentlemen,
>>> >>
>>>
>>> And ladies!
>>>
>>>
>>> >> of course, to hear your thoughts and comments.
>>> >>
>>> >> More on the project: http://on.be.net/1J8ezFh
>>> >> See it in action: http://on.be.net/1FERsjc
>>> >>
>>>
>>> Looks amazing!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Richmond Makerlabs
>>> Ham United Group
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
>>> Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
>>>
>>
>>
>
-- 
Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-10 Thread Satyajit Sahoo 
The font used is in GNOME's, the colors are GNOME-ish, and the name itself
has "GNOME". So there is already enough connections to GNOME, I think.

Satyajit Sahoo
UX Designer
Behance Profile 

We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? — The Doctor,
Season 5, Episode 13.

On 11 July 2015 at 11:58, Charlie_UK .  wrote:

> Not my cup of tea. IMHO, without some connection to the Gnome footprint,
> it's meaningless.
>
> Regards,
>
> *Charlie*
>
>
>
> On 11 July 2015 at 06:42, Andrés Muñiz Piniella 
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> Gentlemen,
>> >>
>>
>> And ladies!
>>
>>
>> >> of course, to hear your thoughts and comments.
>> >>
>> >> More on the project: http://on.be.net/1J8ezFh
>> >> See it in action: http://on.be.net/1FERsjc
>> >>
>>
>> Looks amazing!
>>
>> --
>> Richmond Makerlabs
>> Ham United Group
>>
>> --
>> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
>> Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
>>
>
>
-- 
Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-10 Thread Charlie_UK . 
Not my cup of tea. IMHO, without some connection to the Gnome footprint,
it's meaningless.

Regards,

*Charlie*



On 11 July 2015 at 06:42, Andrés Muñiz Piniella 
wrote:

>
>
>
> >> Gentlemen,
> >>
>
> And ladies!
>
>
> >> of course, to hear your thoughts and comments.
> >>
> >> More on the project: http://on.be.net/1J8ezFh
> >> See it in action: http://on.be.net/1FERsjc
> >>
>
> Looks amazing!
>
> --
> Richmond Makerlabs
> Ham United Group
>
> --
> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
> Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
>
-- 
Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-10 Thread Andrés Muñiz Piniella 



>> Gentlemen,
>>

And ladies!


>> of course, to hear your thoughts and comments.
>>
>> More on the project: http://on.be.net/1J8ezFh
>> See it in action: http://on.be.net/1FERsjc
>>

Looks amazing!

-- 
Richmond Makerlabs
Ham United Group

-- 
Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome

Re: [Ubuntugnome-artwork] [Artwork] Ubuntu GNOME - the new logo by Patrik Bubak

2015-07-10 Thread Satyajit Sahoo 
Also I got mail asking to approve your message somehow.

Satyajit Sahoo
UX Designer
Behance Profile 

We're all stories, in the end. Just make it a good one, eh? — The Doctor,
Season 5, Episode 13.

On 11 July 2015 at 02:45, Alfredo Hernández 
wrote:

> Gentlemen,
>
> I think this matter doesn't need any more postponing, and so I'm happy to
> present to you the fruits of my labour for the past few months.
>
> The artwork team has agreed this be our new brand identity. I would like,
> of course, to hear your thoughts and comments.
>
> More on the project: http://on.be.net/1J8ezFh
> See it in action: http://on.be.net/1FERsjc
>
> For a detailed overview it is highly recommended to go through the attached
> file (PDF, 24 pages).
>
>
> Nothing ruins creativity like too many voices weighing in. We call it the
> Ice Cream Principle. Tell 10 people to go get ice cream with one condition:
> they all have to agree on one flavour. That flavour is going to be
> chocolate or vanilla every time. Groups of people don't agree on what's
> cool or interesting, they agree on what's easy to agree on.
>
> PS. *This was actually written by Patrik, but he's experiencing some
> problems with his mail servers and his messages end up mystically in the
> spam folder in Gmail (and probably other major services as well).*
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
> Post to : ubuntugnome-artw...@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
-- 
Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome