Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 10:58:39PM +0530, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: > > I think your write speed is fast. :P > > > > > I know > > > > > You asked about booting and *working* in both options. Hence my answer. > > > > > I know > > > > As for the answer to your real question, even if I know Ubuntu well > > enough to directly install it without trying, I would go for LiveCD > > > > I know > > > > option just to make sure that all (most) of the hardware is detected. > > > > > I know If you know the answers, why are you asking the questions? Or is it that I am not able to understand your question. > > I don't find any reason why you are telling these things. > > PS: do not just reply. reply with an answer. I am replying with an answer. Its just that may be you are asking for something else. -- Regards, Nitesh Mistry www.mistrynitesh.com PGP key id: CC580416 signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Narendra Sisodiya < naren...@narendrasisodiya.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Nitesh Mistry wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 07:39:21PM +0530, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: >> > > > What exactly is the difference of speed in booting and working in >> both >> > > > options. >> > > >> > > Read speeds of CD drive is obviously slower than that of HDD. >> Everytime >> > > you want to load a program, reading instructions from HDD (ie. >> installed >> > > mode) will be faster than CD drive. >> > > >> > > >> > your read speed is fast. >> > >> > I am asking about going to live mode and then installing system >> > vs >> > directly selecting second option >> >> I think your write speed is fast. :P >> >> > I know > > > >> You asked about booting and *working* in both options. Hence my answer. >> >> > I know > > >> As for the answer to your real question, even if I know Ubuntu well >> enough to directly install it without trying, I would go for LiveCD >> > > I know > > >> option just to make sure that all (most) of the hardware is detected. >> >> > I know > > > I don't find any reason why you are telling these things. > > PS: do not just reply. reply with an answer. > > No speed difference. If you are sure about the hardware detection, go for direct install. But since you have so little RAM, I would suggest that you go for installation using Alternate CD which is text-based install CD. -- Raseel -- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Nitesh Mistry wrote: > On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 07:39:21PM +0530, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: > > > > What exactly is the difference of speed in booting and working in > both > > > > options. > > > > > > Read speeds of CD drive is obviously slower than that of HDD. Everytime > > > you want to load a program, reading instructions from HDD (ie. > installed > > > mode) will be faster than CD drive. > > > > > > > > your read speed is fast. > > > > I am asking about going to live mode and then installing system > > vs > > directly selecting second option > > I think your write speed is fast. :P > > I know > You asked about booting and *working* in both options. Hence my answer. > > I know > As for the answer to your real question, even if I know Ubuntu well > enough to directly install it without trying, I would go for LiveCD > I know > option just to make sure that all (most) of the hardware is detected. > > I know I don't find any reason why you are telling these things. PS: do not just reply. reply with an answer. -- ┌─┐ │Narendra Sisodiya │http://narendrasisodiya.com └─┘ -- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 07:39:21PM +0530, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: > > > What exactly is the difference of speed in booting and working in both > > > options. > > > > Read speeds of CD drive is obviously slower than that of HDD. Everytime > > you want to load a program, reading instructions from HDD (ie. installed > > mode) will be faster than CD drive. > > > > > your read speed is fast. > > I am asking about going to live mode and then installing system > vs > directly selecting second option I think your write speed is fast. :P You asked about booting and *working* in both options. Hence my answer. As for the answer to your real question, even if I know Ubuntu well enough to directly install it without trying, I would go for LiveCD option just to make sure that all (most) of the hardware is detected. -- Regards, Nitesh Mistry www.mistrynitesh.com PGP key id: CC580416 signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Nitesh Mistry wrote: > On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 07:09:00PM +0530, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: > > When Live CD boots, it give two option, live and directly install > > > Live boot , two options in grub entry. > > What exactly is the difference of speed in booting and working in both > > options. > > My concern is about RAM. > > If we have RAM = 125 MB then what is the speed in both option. > > IMO - live CD load rootfs on RAM but Install media might not be doing so. > > Read speeds of CD drive is obviously slower than that of HDD. Everytime > you want to load a program, reading instructions from HDD (ie. installed > mode) will be faster than CD drive. > > your read speed is fast. I am asking about going to live mode and then installing system vs directly selecting second option -- ┌─┐ │Narendra Sisodiya │http://narendrasisodiya.com └─┘ -- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
[ubuntu-in] For those bugged by Adobe Flash see this (note its not a solution its something to make you laugh)
http://abstrusegoose.com/303 As the subject line says and if you are a star trek fan then you will appreciate it even more ram -- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
Re: [ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 07:09:00PM +0530, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: > When Live CD boots, it give two option, live and directly install > > What exactly is the difference of speed in booting and working in both > options. > My concern is about RAM. > If we have RAM = 125 MB then what is the speed in both option. > IMO - live CD load rootfs on RAM but Install media might not be doing so. Read speeds of CD drive is obviously slower than that of HDD. Everytime you want to load a program, reading instructions from HDD (ie. installed mode) will be faster than CD drive. -- Regards, Nitesh Mistry www.mistrynitesh.com PGP key id: CC580416 signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
[ubuntu-in] Ubuntu Install vs Live
When Live CD boots, it give two option, live and directly install What exactly is the difference of speed in booting and working in both options. My concern is about RAM. If we have RAM = 125 MB then what is the speed in both option. IMO - live CD load rootfs on RAM but Install media might not be doing so. -- ┌─┐ │Narendra Sisodiya │http://narendrasisodiya.com └─┘ -- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
[ubuntu-in] OT - good news for open source browser fans
IE goes down see article below Internet Explorer loses the browser battle http://www.hindustantimes.com/Internet-Explorer-loses-the-browser-battle/H1-Article1-609081.aspx Internet Explorer which was holding the majority market share till August 2010, has now hit the minority mark. Browsers like Firefox, Google Chrome are eating into the browser's share, reports Mashable. StatCounter shows IE at 51.34 per cent of the market in August 2010; by the end of September, IE was holding on to just 49.87 per cent of the browser market. The browser also shows a drop of nearly 10 per cent year over year. It is the for the first time that Internet Explore has fallen below the 50 per cent mark. And if the scenario remains the same, it might sink further. The steady growth of Firefox and Chrome over the years has weakened the position of Internet Explorer significantly. While September saw IE touching its lowest mark, Firefox has recorded half a percent growth (31.5 per cent), while Chrome added almost a full percentage point to its share of the market. Current market break-up (Courtesy: Mashable) Internet Explorer: 49.87% Firefox: 31.5% Google Chrome: 11.54% -- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
Re: [ubuntu-in] sudo user on Fedora
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:46 PM, g...@sarai.net wrote: > On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:57:36 +0530 Narendra Sisodiya > wrote > > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:13 PM, g...@sarai.net wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:05:00 +0530 Narendra Sisodiya > > > wrote > > > > > > > How We can create settings to that user will become sudo user. > > > > > > > > I know this procedure. http://lug-iitd.org/Shell_Scripts#SUDO > > > > How ubuntu manage to do it automatically. > > > [...] > > > > > > What is wrong with the above procedure? > > > > > > > > I want some permanent solution that if I create a new user, it will be > given > > sudo power. > [...] > > Look at the EXTRA_GROUPS setting in the adduser configuration file: > /etc/adduser.conf . You can put the admin group in this setting, and > all new users should then have sudo access by virtue of being in the > admin group. > > Thanks a lot. I got what I need to do. Thanks again, -- ┌─┐ │Narendra Sisodiya │http://narendrasisodiya.com └─┘ -- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
Re: [ubuntu-in] Help with installing Epson Scanner 4490 on Ubuntu 9.10
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Narendra Diwate wrote: > Ram > Have you tried reporting this to Epson. It might be that that .deb > file was a reverse engineered or community developed one and not > approved by Epson. It might have then been pulled out. > Just a guess. Otherwise .deb files just cant disappear like that with > so many distro's using deb. > > will do so now However am pretty sure its not re-engineered as almost every help discussion on this scanner refers to downloading the said from AVASYS's website thanks ram > On 10/6/10, Ramnarayan.K wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Ganesan Venkata Subramanian < > > chickoo.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Ram > >> Please try this link > >> http://www.avasys.jp/lx-bin2/linux_e/scan/DL2.do > > > > like i said i have already visited the site and done the needful > > > > chosen scanner > > Perfection 4990 PHOTO > > > > and the other options > > > > *Distribution* Ubuntu > > *Distribution version*9.10 > > *Your country/region* India > > *Connection environment for using printer* scan with local scanner > > *Location for the product* Individual (Graphics/Images) > > > > after that when i click next this is the list of files visible to me > > > > the pasted text got stuck at moderation because its over 10 KB but here > is a > > link to screenshots of what i see > > http://drop.io/2ztzpmv > > > > *** > > as you can see i cannot see the file anywhere ?? > > *iscan-plugin-gt-x750_2.1.0-5_i386.deb* > > > > is it only me , are others getting this missing file when the follow the > > process. > > > > ram > > > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > > Regards > > Narendra Diwate > > -- > ubuntu-in mailing list > ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in > -- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
Re: [ubuntu-in] sudo user on Fedora
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:57:36 +0530 Narendra Sisodiya wrote > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:13 PM, g...@sarai.net wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:05:00 +0530 Narendra Sisodiya > > wrote > > > > > How We can create settings to that user will become sudo user. > > > > > > I know this procedure. http://lug-iitd.org/Shell_Scripts#SUDO > > > How ubuntu manage to do it automatically. > > [...] > > > > What is wrong with the above procedure? > > > > > I want some permanent solution that if I create a new user, it will be given > sudo power. [...] Look at the EXTRA_GROUPS setting in the adduser configuration file: /etc/adduser.conf . You can put the admin group in this setting, and all new users should then have sudo access by virtue of being in the admin group. Regards, Gora -- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
