Re: ubuntu server 16.04 and ovirt-guest-agent
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ovirt-guest-agent/+bug/1776683 Thanks so much! Am 13.06.2018 16:33 schrieb Andreas Hasenack: On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 11:24 AM, Stephan Hermann-Strauß wrote: Hi Andreas, thanks for your fast reply! Because I haven't got a launchpad account yet I would like to ask you to do this. Is it possible to have a look into this bug report without having a launchpad account? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ovirt-guest-agent/+bug/1776683 -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: ubuntu server 16.04 and ovirt-guest-agent
Hi Andreas, thanks for your fast reply! Because I haven't got a launchpad account yet I would like to ask you to do this. Is it possible to have a look into this bug report without having a launchpad account? Thanks and greets Stephan Am 13.06.2018 14:44 schrieb Andreas Hasenack: Hi Stephan, would you mind filing a bug in launchpad for this? Just copy and paste the text you wrote here is more than enough. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ovirt-guest-agent/+filebug If you prefer, I could also file the bug myself, but then you wouldn't receive notifications about when it is acted upon. Thanks for your research into the failure, that was very helpful. On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 9:16 AM, Stephan Hermann-Strauß wrote: Hi, I don't know whether this is the correct mailinglist - if not, I would be glad about better suggestions! :-) We run a bunch of virtual ubuntu servers 16.04 on a kvm/ovirt infrastructure and have ovirt-guest-agent 1.0.11.3-1.1 installed inside the guests. Since we updated ovirt to version 4.2 the guest-agents fail to start. It seems that we ran into this issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1455922 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=863806 As far as I understand this issue is fixed in ovirt-guest-agent version 1.0.13. Is there any hope that there will be an update to 1.0.13 from the ubuntu xenial repositories? Thanks a lot for any hint Stephan -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
ubuntu server 16.04 and ovirt-guest-agent
Hi, I don't know whether this is the correct mailinglist - if not, I would be glad about better suggestions! :-) We run a bunch of virtual ubuntu servers 16.04 on a kvm/ovirt infrastructure and have ovirt-guest-agent 1.0.11.3-1.1 installed inside the guests. Since we updated ovirt to version 4.2 the guest-agents fail to start. It seems that we ran into this issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1455922 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=863806 As far as I understand this issue is fixed in ovirt-guest-agent version 1.0.13. Is there any hope that there will be an update to 1.0.13 from the ubuntu xenial repositories? Thanks a lot for any hint Stephan -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
[Bug 159536] Re: dpkg seg-fault with fai-nfsroot when used in a Xen DomU
I don't like to have this bug report left as incomplete and rott somewhere in the deep dark space of LP trashbin ;) If someone could test this with latest fai on ubuntu maverick or ubuntu lucid, that would be a plus. I*m, on the other hand, will raise this issue with upstream ** Changed in: fai (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: fai (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Triaged ** Changed in: xen-3.1 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Opinion -- dpkg seg-fault with fai-nfsroot when used in a Xen DomU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159536 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: SSH and the Ubuntu Server
Good Morning Dustin, On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 16:50 -0600, Dustin Kirkland wrote: Stephan Hermann s...@sourcecode.de wrote: Hi Scott, On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 13:18 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: On Friday, November 19, 2010 12:02:33 pm Dustin Kirkland wrote: Confirmed this on RHEL6 yesterday. I installed RHEL6 in multiple different modes (minimal, default, developer workstation), all of which a) were running sshd, b) had a root user with a password. Yes, but RHEL6 doesn't dhcp by default and Ubuntu Server does so the attack surface for a default RHEL6 install is rather more limited. To be honest, there is no difference in installing RHEL6 with a static ip address or Ubuntu Server with DHCP enabled. I think we need to find out first, what user base we want to point at. The SysAdmin of a Company with Enterprise Classed Datacenter or the guy/gal from around the corner who is testing ubuntu server? The SysAdmin will have network security in place (if not..oh well), and mostly is he/she not using public IP addresses, and/or they setup their DHCPd to match the MACs of the NICs inside their servers. I am now wondering if we really should change something. As long as I'm thinking about the topic, I'm coming to my conclusion, that we just should tick sshd by default during tasksel in the installer, and that's it. For most of the admins out there, it really doesn't matter, because they have other ways to deploy ubuntu server on their servers. I agree, Stephan. The installer complexity can be avoided by just ticking the OpenSSH Server in the top of the tasksel page as you suggest; document that change thoroughly and publish it far and wide; note the stronger sshd.conf configurations from Marc and the security team in the SSH help page. Yes. We can harden sshd a bit more and document the changes in d-i tasksel via ReleaseNotes and some public announcement on blogs/p.u.c. Unfortunately, I don't think we're reaching a consensus here on ubuntu-de...@. I'm going to redraft the proposal, note that there was no general consensus on the matter in the ubuntu-devel@ mailing list, and ask the Tech Board for guidance. Thanks everyone for the lively discussion. This is something we need to do anyhow. TB has the final say. Regards, \sh -- Stephan '\sh' Hermann SysAdmin / Ubuntu Developer xmpp: s...@sourcecode.de -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: SSH and the Ubuntu Server
Good Morning Dustin, On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 16:50 -0600, Dustin Kirkland wrote: Stephan Hermann s...@sourcecode.de wrote: Hi Scott, On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 13:18 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: On Friday, November 19, 2010 12:02:33 pm Dustin Kirkland wrote: Confirmed this on RHEL6 yesterday. I installed RHEL6 in multiple different modes (minimal, default, developer workstation), all of which a) were running sshd, b) had a root user with a password. Yes, but RHEL6 doesn't dhcp by default and Ubuntu Server does so the attack surface for a default RHEL6 install is rather more limited. To be honest, there is no difference in installing RHEL6 with a static ip address or Ubuntu Server with DHCP enabled. I think we need to find out first, what user base we want to point at. The SysAdmin of a Company with Enterprise Classed Datacenter or the guy/gal from around the corner who is testing ubuntu server? The SysAdmin will have network security in place (if not..oh well), and mostly is he/she not using public IP addresses, and/or they setup their DHCPd to match the MACs of the NICs inside their servers. I am now wondering if we really should change something. As long as I'm thinking about the topic, I'm coming to my conclusion, that we just should tick sshd by default during tasksel in the installer, and that's it. For most of the admins out there, it really doesn't matter, because they have other ways to deploy ubuntu server on their servers. I agree, Stephan. The installer complexity can be avoided by just ticking the OpenSSH Server in the top of the tasksel page as you suggest; document that change thoroughly and publish it far and wide; note the stronger sshd.conf configurations from Marc and the security team in the SSH help page. Yes. We can harden sshd a bit more and document the changes in d-i tasksel via ReleaseNotes and some public announcement on blogs/p.u.c. Unfortunately, I don't think we're reaching a consensus here on ubuntu-de...@. I'm going to redraft the proposal, note that there was no general consensus on the matter in the ubuntu-devel@ mailing list, and ask the Tech Board for guidance. Thanks everyone for the lively discussion. This is something we need to do anyhow. TB has the final say. Regards, \sh -- Stephan '\sh' Hermann SysAdmin / Ubuntu Developer xmpp: s...@sourcecode.de -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: SSH and the Ubuntu Server
Hi Nicolas, On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 09:24 +0100, Nicolas Barcet wrote: Hello Stephan, On 11/18/2010 08:20 AM, Stephan Hermann wrote: First of all, I think for Ubuntu Server the SSHD service should be enabled by default, eventually having a question on what IP interface the service should be listening and eventually giving a possibility to push a ssh public key to the box (please not via Launchpad or other web based services). SSHD is (for me) an essential server service. Having SSHD not enabled by default on Servers is a bit of a strange behaviour, regarding other enterprised based Distros. I think everyone in Corporate Services agrees with your above statement that the default should be to include sshd. However, what we are facing here is a rather major change in default behavior and, as such, justifies that users be properly informed about it. Think about it this way: wouldn't you like to see a warning if at some point the desktop was not to install any graphical interface anymore? Well, when I take the desktop install media, I would like to see a fully working desktop after the installation up and running. That's why I think someone installing from a server install media would like to see a fully running server installation afterwards which is accessable. Now, we can discuss what a fully running server installation is? I would say, that running Ubuntu server in a datacenter, is mostly behind a secured network, where e.g. SSHD is listening on a special ip interface, which is not accessible by everyone but only to a team of admins with Godmode enabled. And yes, most of the time you have remote insight boards etc. to access the machines. On Amazon EC2 this is totally different. I don't actually know if you can somehow access the xen vm without remote access from the public (NATed) network of Amazon. When we are thinking now to enable a service by default, which wasn't installed and enabled in the past, we need to inform the admin. Agreed. But what is the best way? We don't want to have the admin stay as long as it takes at the console. Most admins (at least those I know) do read documentations, and release notes are at least one of the documentations every admin should read (just think about the change of behaviour of the bonding interface setups from jaunty - karmic - lucid). On Ubuntu Desktop this is different. The Desktop doesn't need an sshd server, and there ist shouldn' be installed or when installed, it shouldn't be enabled. A newly introduced service which opens a port could be documented in the release notes and other prominent places. If, as Kees mentioned in another email, we are facing users that press next without looking, do you really think that the same users will take the time to read the release notes? Really, this is difficult to answer. Regarding the user base of non-technicians, comsuming-only desktop users (please, don't interpretate it as all ubuntu users are non-technicians and consuming only), I don't think that those users are reading a lot of documentation. Seeing that from the Windows world, I think we can drop documentation completely. Regarding the Admin people, they do read documentation and especially release notes, ChangeLogs etc. when they are in the field of Operating System Deployment (again, at least the admins I do know and I'm working/had worked with) I think I fully understand the security team's concerns here, but given that: a/ Based on what I have heard at UDS, we are considering adding a post boot install phase for additional package installation, it would seems reasonable to make it available across the network. b/ Even if I have made my initial install with a CD or a USB stick, I do not know much admins that want to stay in front of their servers more than the strict minimum time. Personally I generally hate myself when I have missed to check the sshd service on the tasksel screen, because it means that I'll have to wait in the noisy and cold server room an additional 5 mins (yes, despite our efforts to improve boot times, hardware manufacturer for servers still consider it a great idea to have various checks been done during boot, prior to the OS being loaded) Actually I don't know any admin anymore who stands in front of a console in a cold datacenter, mostly we are using ILOs and other remote console access methods to get hands on the server (most of our servers don't even have CD drives anymore, totally useless nowadays). That's why I already think that we are discussing a matter which isn't really one. What we are trying now is to deliver a better user experience, for people trying out our server media. c/ Similarly to b, when I am installing a virtual machine, the less time I spend in the server screen emulation the better, as this is generally much slower and often much clumsier (think keyboard mapping for example) than accessing the same server over SSH
Re: SSH and the Ubuntu Server
Hi Scott, On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 13:18 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: On Friday, November 19, 2010 12:02:33 pm Dustin Kirkland wrote: Confirmed this on RHEL6 yesterday. I installed RHEL6 in multiple different modes (minimal, default, developer workstation), all of which a) were running sshd, b) had a root user with a password. Yes, but RHEL6 doesn't dhcp by default and Ubuntu Server does so the attack surface for a default RHEL6 install is rather more limited. To be honest, there is no difference in installing RHEL6 with a static ip address or Ubuntu Server with DHCP enabled. I think we need to find out first, what user base we want to point at. The SysAdmin of a Company with Enterprise Classed Datacenter or the guy/gal from around the corner who is testing ubuntu server? The SysAdmin will have network security in place (if not..oh well), and mostly is he/she not using public IP addresses, and/or they setup their DHCPd to match the MACs of the NICs inside their servers. I am now wondering if we really should change something. As long as I'm thinking about the topic, I'm coming to my conclusion, that we just should tick sshd by default during tasksel in the installer, and that's it. For most of the admins out there, it really doesn't matter, because they have other ways to deploy ubuntu server on their servers. Regards, \sh -- Stephan '\sh' Hermann SysAdmin / Ubuntu Developer xmpp: s...@sourcecode.de -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Re: SSH and the Ubuntu Server
Moins, On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 12:24 -0500, Luke Faraone wrote: On 11/18/2010 12:04 PM, Dustin Kirkland wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Colin Watson cjwat...@ubuntu.com wrote: No, it's not. In Maverick it was arguably buried. In Natty, it is the very top entry on the tasksel menu, and the cursor rests on it when you reach that screen. [snip] I would gladly revise this proposal to simply: * Automatically 'tick' OpenSSH Server by default on the Server Tasksel screen Which would also sit there and wait for the user to consciously affirm their selection, and would avoid the countless server installations where people forget to install SSH and must make their way back to a console on their newly installed system and add the openssh-server package. As many people have mentioned, this will cause a surprise for users who click through the install dialogs expecting things to not change since they last used it. Sorry, but this is something which strucks me, really. When we don't change things over time, we will never have a better user experience. When we change something it needs to be documented in a public place where everyone interested can read it first hand. Also, since this occurs late in the install process, no dialogs to prompt the user to harden their password can be offered, as others have suggested. Oh well, we can change that inside the installer as well. Not prompting for a user choice, but choosing a hardened password automatically and showing it to the user mkpasswd --chars=20 --crypt-md5 or whatever should be enough. that's only a technical problem easily to solve. You say there are countless installations. I don't think anybody expects SSH to be automatically installed in a new server; it's a service that should be enabled carefully after consideration of your network environment and security needs. I feel that the potential for harm of accidental installation exceeds the increase in convenience from not having to explicitly select the task. I think we have more installations of RHEL or SLES in the enterprise server market, and they do have sshd enabled by default. Even when you install an VMWare ESX host, ssh is enabled by default, without the questionable root access. Regards, \sh -- Stephan '\sh' Hermann SysAdmin / Ubuntu Developer xmpp: s...@sourcecode.de -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: SSH and the Ubuntu Server
Hi Dustin, On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 15:38 -0600, Dustin Kirkland wrote: Ubuntu has long maintained a no open ports by default policy. This conservative approach arguably yields a more secure default installation. Several exceptions have been granted to this policy, which install services on the target system without the user's explicit consent, but in the calculated interest and support of a vastly more usable Ubuntu. Let me be clear: I am NOT requesting that sort of an exception. I am asking for ubuntu-devel's consensus, and an eventual Ubuntu Technical Board approval of a new prompt in the Ubuntu Server ISO's text-based installer, which would read something like the following: -- | If you need a secure connection to this | server remotely, you may wish to install | the openssh-server package. Note that | this service will open TCP port 22 on | your system, and you should use a very | strong password. | | Do you want to install the SSH service? | |[[YES]][no] -- Rest assured that the exact text will be word-smithed by an appropriate committee to hash out an optimum verbiage. If such a message would be displayed during alternative setup from CD, it would give me a shock. It's just like If you need a UI for this Desktop you may wish to install GNOME. Note that this choice will install hundreds of other packages which can or can not harm/destroy/pollute your system, and you should reconsider your choice. Do you want to install GNOME on your System? [[YES]] [no] First of all, I think for Ubuntu Server the SSHD service should be enabled by default, eventually having a question on what IP interface the service should be listening and eventually giving a possibility to push a ssh public key to the box (please not via Launchpad or other web based services). SSHD is (for me) an essential server service. Having SSHD not enabled by default on Servers is a bit of a strange behaviour, regarding other enterprised based Distros. On Ubuntu Desktop this is different. The Desktop doesn't need an sshd server, and there ist shouldn' be installed or when installed, it shouldn't be enabled. A newly introduced service which opens a port could be documented in the release notes and other prominent places. Regards, \sh -- Stephan '\sh' Hermann SysAdmin / Ubuntu Developer xmpp: s...@sourcecode.de -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
[Bug 533369] Re: Fails to debootstrap squeeze chroot due to missing apt-get
@Dustin: On it -- Fails to debootstrap squeeze chroot due to missing apt-get https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 533369] Re: Fails to debootstrap squeeze chroot due to missing apt-get
Works as Expected The only left bone which is not looking ok is: Processing triggers for python-support ... E: 05file: tar: ./var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: socket ignored Regards, \sh -- Fails to debootstrap squeeze chroot due to missing apt-get https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 660460] Re: Need option to not launch server on boot
I can confirm this. This bug should be fixed in a new version upload to natty, and evtl. we could SRU a patch for Maverick and Lucid. Regards, \sh ** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Need option to not launch server on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660460 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to rabbitmq-server in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 660460] Re: Need option to not launch server on boot
I can confirm this. This bug should be fixed in a new version upload to natty, and evtl. we could SRU a patch for Maverick and Lucid. Regards, \sh ** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Need option to not launch server on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660460 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 655189] [NEW] FAI 3.4.3 Bugfix Release
Public bug reported: This new native release fixes the following bugs: [ Thomas Lange ] * [01730b1] add Julien to THANKS file * [8fd3b92] raise importance of libproc-daemon-perl to Recommends (Closes: #593089) * [4d2967c] remove netmask from IP address (Closes: #597870) * [c6371e9] remove unused code (Closes: #596055) * Documentation related changes: - [c3d74dc] fix url of solaris/auto-install - [a34bb05] new domain name for the project (fai-project.org) - [f7a8ae1] fix homepage url - [a392628] fix link and date in QUESTIONNAIRE - [7986692] new date in fai-guide.txt - [827b6db] add more detailed list of tasks [ Michael Tautschnig ] * [cc508b6] setup-storage/Fstab.pm: Don't resolve LVM devices via readlink (thanks Brian Kroth for suggesting a similar patch). (Closes: #597238) * [ccad800] Fixed a whitespace/table alignment issue. * [9728758] Clarify error message in case of invalid use of swap/luks in disk_config [ Julien BLACHE ] * [8b1abdc] Fix preserve for RAID * [79f10a1] Rework mdadm output parsing code to make it more tolerant to changes in the output format ** Affects: fai (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- FAI 3.4.3 Bugfix Release https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 651190] [NEW] Sync potool 0.11-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync potool 0.11-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Fixes an installation issue, see BTS #597321 Changelog entries since current maverick version 0.11-1: potool (0.11-2) unstable; urgency=high * Update Polish manpage path in update-alternatives invocation. The wrong path (apart from making the Polish manpage version unavailable via 'poedit' name) caused postinst failures with lenny's dpkg version, which made it a grave bug. Closes: #597321 -- Marcin Owsiany porri...@debian.org Sat, 18 Sep 2010 18:14:37 +0100 ** Affects: potool (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: potool (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: potool (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Sync potool 0.11-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651190 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 651194] [NEW] Sync collectd 4.10.1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync collectd 4.10.1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Fixes some RC bugs marked in debian, we should get it, too Changelog entries since current maverick version 4.10.1-1: collectd (4.10.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium * debian/rules: - Added support for ‘powerpcspe’ to the Java arch mapping; thanks to Sebastian Andrzej Siewior for the patch (Closes: #592909). * debian/patches: - Added bts595756-notify_email-segfault -- upstream patch fixing a segfault in the 'notify_email' plugin; thanks to Manuel CISSE for reporting this (Closes: #595756). - Added bts592623-curl_json-file -- upstream patch fixing access to file:// URLs in the 'curl_json' plugin; thanks Baptiste Mille-Mathias for reporting this and pointing out the patch (Closes: #592623). - Added bts596128-reheap-fix -- upstream patch fixing the 'reheap()' function used to manage the read callbacks and making sure all plugins get executed correctly and in each interval (Closes: #596128). * Set urgency to medium because of the RC bug-fix. -- Sebastian Harl tok...@debian.org Wed, 08 Sep 2010 22:50:54 +0200 ** Affects: collectd (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: collectd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: collectd (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Sync collectd 4.10.1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651194 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: RC Bugs Page Needs Some Attention
On Wednesday, September 29, 2010 04:02:56 am Scott Kitterman wrote: For those of you that may not know, http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/bugs/rcbugs/ is a very good resource to find bug fixes from Debian that we may want to get into Maverick. It doesn't seem to have gotten a lot of attention, so if you have a free moment, have a look and see if there's something there we ought to have. Syncs or merges? Regards, \sh -- OSS Developer / Ubuntu Developer SysAdmin JID: s...@sourcecode.de http://shermann.name/ -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
[Bug 649662] [NEW] [FFe] stellarium-0.10.5
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: stellarium Dear Colleagues, as reported in https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/stellarium/+bug/593038, stellarium 0.10.4 has problems with non C/en locales. This has been addressed upstream and is fixed in 0.10.5. The needed files for the FFe are attached to this bug report. As you can read on the mentioned bug-report, 0.10.5 is fixing this bug. Stellarium 0.10.5 only adds 5 new features to the release. Please consider an ACK for this request. Thx, \sh ** Affects: stellarium (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: ffe -- [FFe] stellarium-0.10.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649662 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 649662] Re: [FFe] stellarium-0.10.5
** Attachment added: Upstream Changelog Diff https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/649662/+attachment/1647753/+files/changelog.diff -- [FFe] stellarium-0.10.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649662 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 649662] Re: [FFe] stellarium-0.10.5
** Attachment added: install log and starting log https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stellarium/+bug/649662/+attachment/1647754/+files/install.log -- [FFe] stellarium-0.10.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649662 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 649662] Re: [FFe] stellarium-0.10.5
** Attachment added: sbuild build logfile on arch amd64 https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stellarium/+bug/649662/+attachment/1647755/+files/stellarium_0.10.5-0ubuntu1_amd64.build -- [FFe] stellarium-0.10.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649662 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 615300] Re: Set and/or enable default Evolution signature as Sent from Ubuntu
@Matthew, we are old and long standing Ubuntu contributors, and Ubuntu was never ever a community driven distro. What we are is a commercial driven distro, which is developed by the community. Nothing more, nothing less. This is a good thing, as I as a community developer can have a say to a company which needs to earn money. Peace, \sh -- Set and/or enable default Evolution signature as Sent from Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 636363] Re: After importing backend.ldif I get Invalid credentials (49)
Hi, did you try to do this: sudo ldapadd -Y EXTERNAL -H ldapi:/// -f frontend.lan.local.ldif Could be that you are missing some acls for cn=admin -- After importing backend.ldif I get Invalid credentials (49) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636363 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 636363] Re: After importing backend.ldif I get Invalid credentials (49)
hmm... I just followed the document and everything worked fine... I wonder what's missing... INvestigating -- After importing backend.ldif I get Invalid credentials (49) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636363 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 636363] Re: After importing backend.ldif I get Invalid credentials (49)
Hi, did you try to do this: sudo ldapadd -Y EXTERNAL -H ldapi:/// -f frontend.lan.local.ldif Could be that you are missing some acls for cn=admin -- After importing backend.ldif I get Invalid credentials (49) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636363 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 636363] Re: After importing backend.ldif I get Invalid credentials (49)
hmm... I just followed the document and everything worked fine... I wonder what's missing... INvestigating -- After importing backend.ldif I get Invalid credentials (49) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636363 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 628776] [NEW] HP NC511i Driver (be2net and be2scsi) is missing in kernel module udebs
Public bug reported: Dear Colleagues, I tested this morning two installations of Lucid (10.04.1) and Maverick (Daily from yesterday) server flavour. The installation was performed on a HP BL465 G7 Series with an HP NC511i Ethernet/ISCSI/FoE dual port 10GBit/s card. During installation via debian-installer, the network interfaces were not found, because of the missing kernel module. But after installation and rebooting into the production system, the kernel detected the card and loaded the following modules: be2net be2scsi Somehow those two modules are missing from the installer kernel udeb packages. Please consider a fix for Maverick and also for Lucid 10.04.2 Thx in advance, \sh ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- HP NC511i Driver (be2net and be2scsi) is missing in kernel module udebs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628776 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 627319] [NEW] zend-framework 1.10.8 (bugfix release)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: zend-framework This is a documentation report only, for the next upcomfing upload of zend-framework 1.10.8. This upload is a bugfix only release. It fixes the following issues: (more infos can be retrieved at http://devzone.zend.com/article/12481-Zend-Framework-1.10.8-Released) Changelog: 1.10.8 Issues resolved for this release: [ZF-10220]: Zend_Cache_Manager has no way to get all the caches [ZF-9855]: Notice Failed saving metadata to metadataCache appears when TwoLevels cache backend is used for DB metadata caching [ZF-9358]: Zend_CodeGenerator_Php_Parameter::generate() typo [ZF-10095]: Zend_Config_Writer_Ini does not write properly to global namespace [ZF-6289]: Zend_Config_Writer_Ini jumbling sections [ZF-9179]: _getParam second parameter no longer working when used in conjunction with routes [ZF-10340]: Non-Working Examples in Zend_Db_Profiler-Firebug [ZF-1]: Zend_Db_Select having() does not allow passing the type of a value [ZF-10296]: Invalid sequence name with postgres [ZF-10257]: nextSequenceId overquotes schema/sequence name [ZF-10246]: Tag URIs Incorrectly Considered Invalid as Atom Entry IDs [ZF-10277]: Constructor code for response header analysis throws PHP Notice: Undefined offset: 1 when instanciated with header array. [ZF-10390]: _getCacheInternalId() only uses adapter name not values [ZF-5545]: Undefined offset notice in Search/Lucene/Search/Query/MultiTerm.php [ZF-10354]: Windows Azure tests cleanup [ZF-9780]: Zend_Soap_Autodiscover : setters become fluent interfaces [ZF-10290]: Zend Tool incorrectly requests 'Log' Boostrap resource in generated ErrorController for new project [ZF-10252]: Error controller created by command line tool generates notices [ZF-10225]: Parameter name typo in Zend_Tool_Framework_System_Provider_Version [ZF-10071]: Default ErrorController created by Zend_Tool generates notices. [ZF-9541]: Zend_Tool_Framework_Client_Console_ArgumentParser Doesn't Declare Property _manifestRepository [ZF-10276]: Finnish translation for Zend_Validate messages [ZF-5413]: using $var === null instaed of is_null($var) ** Affects: zend-framework (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- zend-framework 1.10.8 (bugfix release) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 627337] [NEW] [FFE] FAI 3.4 for Ubuntu Maverick
Public bug reported: Dear Colleagues, this is a request for adding the latest FAI (Fully Automatic Installation) packages to Ubuntu Maverick. The packages are tested for maverick and lucid by FAI community members (through launchpad.net/~fai/ PPA) Please add this package to ubuntu maverick, so we are able to backport those to lucid, too. There was a standing freeze exception for FAI in former times, please read this ML thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/ubuntu-m...@lists.ubuntu.com/msg04598.html ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [FFE] FAI 3.4 for Ubuntu Maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627337 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 627337] Re: [FFE] FAI 3.4 for Ubuntu Maverick
** Attachment added: DSC file for fai-3.4 https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/627337/+attachment/1531534/+files/fai_3.4.0ubuntu1.dsc -- [FFE] FAI 3.4 for Ubuntu Maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627337 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 627337] Re: [FFE] FAI 3.4 for Ubuntu Maverick
** Attachment added: orig tar file for fai 3.4 https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/627337/+attachment/1531535/+files/fai_3.4.0ubuntu1.tar.gz ** Description changed: Dear Colleagues, this is a request for adding the latest FAI (Fully Automatic Installation) packages to Ubuntu Maverick. The packages are tested for maverick and lucid by FAI community members (through launchpad.net/~fai/ PPA) Please add this package to ubuntu maverick, so we are able to backport those to lucid, too. + + There was a standing freeze exception for FAI in former times, please read this ML thread: + http://www.mail-archive.com/ubuntu-m...@lists.ubuntu.com/msg04598.html -- [FFE] FAI 3.4 for Ubuntu Maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627337 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 338157] Re: FAI is out of date
FAI is back on track for maverick. ** Changed in: fai (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- FAI is out of date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338157 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 533369] Re: Fails to debootstrap squeeze chroot due to missing apt-get
guys... this bug is still not fixed for lucid... -- Fails to debootstrap squeeze chroot due to missing apt-get https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 533369] Re: Fails to debootstrap squeeze chroot due to missing apt-get
Dear Colleagues, please find attached the debdiff for an SRU of debootstrap for lucid (1.0.20) Regards, \sh ** Patch added: debdiff for lucid (upload to lucid-proposed) https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debootstrap/+bug/533369/+attachment/1495226/+files/debootstrap_1.0.20ubuntu2.debdiff -- Fails to debootstrap squeeze chroot due to missing apt-get https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 618554] Re: package zend-framework-bin (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: по пытка перезаписи '/usr/bin/ zf', котор(ый)ая также на ходится в пакете zendframewo rk-bin 0:1.10.0-1
Dear reporter, the last version in Lucid of Zend-Framework is 1.10.3-0ubuntu1. Please apt-get remove all packages from zend-framework, and try to reinstall. Thanks, \sh ** Changed in: zend-framework (Ubuntu) Status: New = Won't Fix -- package zend-framework-bin (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: попытка перезаписи '/usr/bin/zf', котор(ый)ая также находится в пакете zendframework-bin 0:1.10.0-1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618554 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: ubuntu-tweak in new
moins, On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 10:21 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: On Tuesday, August 03, 2010 09:16:05 pm LI Daobing wrote: On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 09:09, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote: On Tuesday, August 03, 2010 09:05:25 pm LI Daobing wrote: Hello, On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 09:00, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote: On Tuesday, August 03, 2010 01:29:46 pm Jonathan Riddell wrote: Ubuntu Tweak is waiting for approval in New queue. http://ubuntu-tweak.com/ https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/252140 Is this something MOTU wants included? No. It looks to me like something that, in addition to proper packaging, ought to have a thorough functional review before entering the archive. I am the packager of ubuntu-tweak, can you tell me what's the problem with ubuntu-tweak? I don't know that there is a problem, but given the invasive nature of it's functionality, I think it appropriate for it to be given more of a review than just being packaged properly. In Ubuntu's history there have been multiple Tweak programs and so far they have always proved to be more harmful than helpful at the scale the Ubuntu archive operates. This one may be the one that gets it right, but having found that they rebrand PPAs that other people maintain as there's on their web site, I'm not at all inclined to assume this is all well intentioned. you are right. this package is active-maintained, and I'll forward your opinion to the upstream author. I think he'll fix this bug. ubuntu-tweak is very useful for me, and it's also has many users. so I want to push it to Ubuntu and hope it can catch ubuntu 10.10. thanks. I don't have a lot of time for a detailed review. A quick look shows that this can enable quite a number of untrusted repositories. My recollection is that we although Envy was initially accepted doing something similar it was required to be fixed to not do this. I don't think a package that adds untrusted repositories is suitable. Yes, it can enable a lot of untrusted sources, but I don't understand how it does it. under software-center there are lot of archives, which are not ubuntu official, but they are greyed out...and with the unlock button it does nothing (I took the version from revu) Tbh, everything what's in there is already available on a standard gnome desktop. We don't need a copy of update-manager, software-center or whatever is in there... I even don't like descriptions like there are in ubuntutweak/common/appdata.py. It think that this could give us a sitution as we had during times when we had the unofficial backport times... I will not give a +1 for this tool in the official ubuntu archives. Regards, \sh signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Re: ubuntu-tweak in new
Moins, On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 11:37 -0400, Andrew SB wrote: On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Stephan Hermann s...@sourcecode.de wrote: We had that in the past, and this will happen with unreflected usage of tools like this. (Please read the threads about Automatix and Friends in the past...google have references) For reference, here's Matthew Garrett's technical review of Automatix: http://mjg59.livejournal.com/77440.html Re-reading that now, I note that the issue of adding untrusted third party sources doesn't seem to be the argument against Automatix. Matthew wrote in his last paragraph: In its current form Automatix is unsupportable, and a mechanism for flagging bugs from machines with Automatix installed may provide a valuable aid for determining whether issues are due to supported distribution packages or third party software installers. This may not be read as argument against automatix, but the past told us, what will happen to the Ubuntu Bug tracker when third party repositories (and even PPAs from LP are third party) are enabled and non-distro packages are installed. We had all this discussions in the past, and we came to the conclusion that we want to support backports but in an official means Ubuntu blessed way. That's why we created ubuntu backports repository... But there are also other things I don't like. An easy way to tweak gconf settings could also be dangerous for Ubuntu users. But that's eventually only me. One thing I would like to raise: Someone who wants to tweak his/her setup, is not the normal Ubuntu user. Mostly they are power users, and I do think that really knowledged power users can tweak their systems without such a tool. Making it an easy task to tweak and break peoples Ubuntu installation shouldn't be a goal for us in general. Users of mostly all operating systems are doing things, when someone tells them to do so, but those people don't know anything about the dangers. If something breaks, Ubuntu will be flooded with bug reports and complaints, and this is really something we should avoid. A better solution will be to push more backports. And backporting is not that difficult, it just takes time and caution, to not break working systems. Regards, \sh signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
Re: really drop SSLv2
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 14:12 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: In 2008 there was discussion[1] about disabling SSLv2 in OpenSSL. The conclusion seemed favorable for it, and so it was attempted[2] in openssl 0.9.8g-10.1ubuntu2 for Intrepid. Unfortunately, this change seems to have had no affect on the build, and SSLv2 has remained available. I would like to propose fixing this for real now, and documenting the change in the SSL man pages. I'd like to point out that even as far back as Dapper, GnuTLS has not supported SSLv2; IMO, it is high time to make it go away for OpenSSL too. The attached debdiff would disallow the use of SSLv2 in any mode without wrecking the openssl library ABI. Yes please, make it go away. People who are configuring mod_ssl with openssl the wrong way, always have problems when a security audit comes along. SSLv2 is deprecated and should never be used in any scenario. Regards, \sh -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
[Bug 604168] Re: zendframework is still in Lucid and Maverick
Acked by me... please remove debians zendframework package from the archive. I'll add a transitional package to ubuntus zend-framework package... Regards, \sh ** Changed in: zendframework (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- zendframework is still in Lucid and Maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604168 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 592786] Re: qtcreator crashes on start in maverick
Confirmed... I'll attach an strace to this buglooks like it's not an ibus problem...because starting ibus-daemon changed anything. ** Changed in: qtcreator (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- qtcreator crashes on start in maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 592786] Re: qtcreator crashes on start in maverick
** Attachment added: strace of qtcreator startup incl. segfault http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50266543/qtcreator.log -- qtcreator crashes on start in maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 592786] Re: qtcreator crashes on start in maverick
gdb backtrace: Starting program: /usr/bin/qtcreator.bin [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] (3819) KSharedDataCache::Private::mapSharedMemory: Opening cache /var/tmp/kdecache-shermann/icon-cache.kcache page size is 4096 (3819) KSharedDataCache::Private::mapSharedMemory: Attached to cache, determining if it must be initialized (3819) KSharedDataCache::Private::mapSharedMemory: Cache fully initialized -- attached to memory mapping (3819) KSharedDataCache::Private::mapSharedMemory: 5148672 bytes available out of 10485760 [New Thread 0x7fffeaa6a710 (LWP 3822)] [Thread 0x7fffeaa6a710 (LWP 3822) exited] registerWindow Invalid WindowMenu.Registrar! [New Thread 0x7fffeaa6a710 (LWP 3823)] [New Thread 0x7fffdd7a8710 (LWP 3826)] [New Thread 0x7fffdcf18710 (LWP 3827)] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x76598907 in QString::operator=(QString const) () from /usr/lib/libQtCore.so.4 (gdb) backtrace #0 0x76598907 in QString::operator=(QString const) () from /usr/lib/libQtCore.so.4 #1 0x7fffe12a049f in QDeclarativeType::QDeclarativeType(int, QDeclarativePrivate::RegisterType const) () from /usr/lib/libQtDeclarative.so.4 #2 0x7fffe12a41cd in QDeclarativePrivate::registerType(QDeclarativePrivate::RegisterType const) () from /usr/lib/libQtDeclarative.so.4 #3 0x7fffe161d634 in ?? () from /usr/lib/qtcreator/plugins/Nokia/libQmlProjectManager.so #4 0x7fffe161ba44 in ?? () from /usr/lib/qtcreator/plugins/Nokia/libQmlProjectManager.so #5 0x7fffe1622815 in ?? () from /usr/lib/qtcreator/plugins/Nokia/libQmlProjectManager.so #6 0x77bc8c84 in ExtensionSystem::Internal::PluginSpecPrivate::initializePlugin() () from /usr/bin/../lib/qtcreator/libExtensionSystem.so.1 #7 0x77bc37b3 in ExtensionSystem::Internal::PluginManagerPrivate::loadPlugin(ExtensionSystem::PluginSpec*, ExtensionSystem::PluginSpec::State) () from /usr/bin/../lib/qtcreator/libExtensionSystem.so.1 #8 0x77bc396f in ExtensionSystem::Internal::PluginManagerPrivate::loadPlugins() () from /usr/bin/../lib/qtcreator/libExtensionSystem.so.1 #9 0x0040a4e7 in ?? () #10 0x757b5d8d in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 #11 0x00405b79 in ?? () #12 0x7fffe1b8 in ?? () #13 0x001c in ?? () #14 0x0001 in ?? () #15 0x7fffe4ae in ?? () #16 0x in ?? () -- qtcreator crashes on start in maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 522106] Re: libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386
@Steve: Ok, this was the official patch by upstream. The other solution will be to not build libunwind-setjmp.so from source...which was proposed by fedora (see first comment of me) Regards, \sh -- libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522106 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)
Ralf, but the client sends the http request headers with an empty Hostname: header or did I miss something, if Hostname header is not set it's http/1.0 ... I wonder if it's a client problem Regards, \sh -- client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589611 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)
Ralf, but the client sends the http request headers with an empty Hostname: header or did I miss something, if Hostname header is not set it's http/1.0 ... I wonder if it's a client problem Regards, \sh -- client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589611 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 585291] Re: Merge giggle 0.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) (FTBFS on maverick amd64)
Now for the fun part... what did we change regarding the default compile settings for maverick...investigating -- Merge giggle 0.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) (FTBFS on maverick amd64) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585291 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 522106] Re: libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386
Moins, simple non-intrusive patch for libunwind to compile cleanly. rechecked with google-perftools and it works as expected. Please sponsor ;) Regards, \sh ** Patch added: libunwind_0.99-0.2ubuntu1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49424584/libunwind_0.99-0.2ubuntu1.debdiff -- libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522106 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 587804] [NEW] Sync openct 0.6.20-1.1 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync openct 0.6.20-1.1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: Ubuntu Changes were adopted upstream (debian) Changelog entries since current maverick version 0.6.19-1ubuntu3: openct (0.6.20-1.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Fix build on kfreebsd-* (Closes: #564652) - d/control: Add Build-Depends on libusb2-dev [kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64] - d/control: Add Build-Conflict on libusb-dev (for all archs) - d/rules: Use conditional configure option to enable libusb on kfreebsd-* Thanks to Petr Salinger and Andreas Jellinghaus! -- Damien Raude-Morvan draz...@debian.org Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:04:57 +0200 openct (0.6.20-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. (Closes: #570105, #569132) * libtool.m4: Remove libtool file that snuck in here at some point. * debian/rules, debian/openct.install: Patch from Andreas Jellinghaus to fixup udev rules and add bundle file for pcscd. (Closes: #563755, #528123) -- Eric Dorland e...@debian.org Sun, 28 Feb 2010 04:48:31 -0500 ** Affects: openct (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: openct (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: openct (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Sync openct 0.6.20-1.1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587804 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 587806] [NEW] Sync spamprobe 1.4d-7 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
Public bug reported:
Please sync spamprobe 1.4d-7 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped:
Changes are now in debian
Changelog entries since current maverick version 1.4d-5ubuntu1:
spamprobe (1.4d-7) unstable; urgency=low
* Fixed spelling error in man page (closes: #580950)
* Updated translations of debconf template:
* French, by Christian Perrier (closes: #581183)
* German, by Helge Kreutzmann (closes: #581213)
* Russian, by Yuri Kozlov (closes: #581403)
* Vietnamese, by Clytie Siddall (closes: #581502)
* Italian, by Luca Monducci (closes: #581755)
* Portugese, by Pedro Ribeiro (closes: #581816)
* Czech, by Miroslav Kure (closes: #581992)
* Brazilian Portugese, by Adriano Rafael Gomes (closes: #582112)
* Japanese, by Hideki Yamane (closes: #582304)
* Spanish, by Omar Campagne (closes: #582629)
* Swedish, by Martin Bagge (closes: #582700)
-- Nicolas Duboc ndu...@debian.org Mon, 24 May 2010 14:38:10 +0200
spamprobe (1.4d-6) unstable; urgency=low
* Now build-depends on libgif-dev instead of obsolete libungif4-dev
(closes: #575862)
* New Spanish debconf template translation (closes: #579204)
* Switched to libdb 4.8 (closes: #548488)
* Updated debconf master template for the libdb upgrade.
* Package maintainer scripts no longer ignore errors
* Added ${misc:Depends} on binary package dependency list
* Bumped debhelper compat version from 4 to 7
* Added debian/source/format file, but still using 1.0 format for now
* Added Homepage field in control file
* Compliant with Debian policy 3.8.3 (no change)
* Fixed portability issue of hash database on amd64 (closes: #564643)
Patch from Jem Berkes and Francis Russell
-- Nicolas Duboc ndu...@debian.org Sun, 09 May 2010 10:20:33 +0200
** Affects: spamprobe (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: spamprobe (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: spamprobe (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Sync spamprobe 1.4d-7 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587806
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 585291] Re: Sync giggle 0.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
@Lukas, would be nice, if you can mention this bug on merges.ubuntu.com ... as I'm the last uploader..I tried to sync/merge it...and as benjamin commented, it doesn't work... -- Merge giggle 0.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) (FTBFS on maverick amd64) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585291 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 585291] Re: Sync giggle 0.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
setting it to in-progress, + assigning it to me..doing the work on the package ** Changed in: giggle (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: giggle (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Stephan Hermann (shermann) ** Summary changed: - Sync giggle 0.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) + Merge giggle 0.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) (FTBFS on maverick amd64) -- Merge giggle 0.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) (FTBFS on maverick amd64) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585291 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 586338] [NEW] Sync fsviewer 0.2.5-6.1 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync fsviewer 0.2.5-6.1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: Changes are adopted by debian. Changelog entries since current maverick version 0.2.5-6ubuntu1: fsviewer (0.2.5-6.1) unstable; urgency=low [ Jari Aalto ] * Non-maintainer upload. - Fix FTBFS RC bug (Closes: #575623). * debian/control - (Build-Depends): update obsolete libungif4-dev ro libgif-dev. * debian/rules - (build-stamp): Add LDFLAGS=-L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 -lXext -lXpm -lm. -- Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:28:19 +0300 ** Affects: fsviewer (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: fsviewer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: fsviewer (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Sync fsviewer 0.2.5-6.1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 580507] [NEW] Please blacklist and remove this package
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: zendframework Dear Colleagues, pls blacklist this package from debian-autosync and please remove it from the archive. Ubuntu has it's own zend-framework package which is actively maintained and uses a different upstream tarball (with more goodies insight). Regards, \sh ** Affects: zendframework (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: New -- Please blacklist and remove this package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580507 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 511996] Re: missing dependency
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #576114 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576114 ** Also affects: python-couchdbkit (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576114 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- missing dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 511996] Re: missing dependency
python-restkit needs packaging, but strangely I found a package in debian NEW queue only as cached copy http://74.125.77.132/search?q=cache:UZH6Qvb7gr4J:ftp-master.debian.org/new/python-restkit_1.3.0-1.html+python-restkitcd=3hl=enct=clnkclient=ubuntu on google. Strangely I don't find it anywhere in debians archive :( Regards, \sh -- missing dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 511996] Re: Please remove python-couchdbkit from lucid archive (was: missing dependency)
** Summary changed: - missing dependency + Please remove python-couchdbkit from lucid archive (was: missing dependency) ** Description changed: + Please remove this package from lucids archive. + Two deps are missing, one is python-anyjson and one is python-restkit. + + The first one is already fixed in debian (see bts #576114) but the + second one doesn't appear anywhere. + + (see further comments) + + Thx, + + \sh + .- Binary package hint: python-couchdbkit It seems that a dependency to python-anyjson missing: - Traceback (most recent call last): - File ./test1.py, line 4, in module - from couchdbkit import * - File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/couchdbkit/client.py, line 50, in module - import anyjson - ImportError: No module named anyjson + Traceback (most recent call last): + File ./test1.py, line 4, in module + from couchdbkit import * + File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/couchdbkit/client.py, line 50, in module + import anyjson + ImportError: No module named anyjson Installing python-anyjson fixed that issue. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Jan 24 18:28:39 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 NonfreeKernelModules: openafs Package: python-couchdbkit 0.3.1+dfsg-1 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: - LANGUAGE= - PATH=(custom, no user) - LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 - SHELL=/bin/zsh + LANGUAGE= + PATH=(custom, no user) + LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/zsh ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-11.15-generic SourcePackage: python-couchdbkit Uname: Linux 2.6.32-11-generic i686 -- Please remove python-couchdbkit from lucid archive (was: missing dependency) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: Future of MOTU
Moins, On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:15:45 -0600 Brian J Mingus brian.min...@colorado.edu wrote: I have run my own (K)Ubuntu repository for four years so your stereotype must not be completely true. Oh well, this is really...the usual way of doing things. I#m working with software stacks, which aren't inside Debian, Ubuntu, RedHat or OpenSuSE. I'm maintaining repositories with those software for months and years. That's a normal thing. This comes with someones job. Not all software will be pushed into Ubuntu or Debian or whatever distro you use. Maintaining repositories outside the distro landscape is really not the problem. The problem are software packages, where someone wants it in Ubuntu or Debian or whatever distro someone uses. This software package needs to be well maintained and updated/upgraded over time. And this is exactly the problem. A software packager who maintains this package can apply as well for Ubuntu Developer or Debian Developer or Fedora Maintainer or OpenSuSE developer if he or she is ready for that. This implies normally that the newly approved developer will take care about the self made package and about other software packages we have in universe and multiverse. But someone who just wants his or her special software pushed to ubuntu is normally not the type of person who supports it after its pushed to ubuntu. And those packages are rotting in our archives, and after some time, when it doesn't build anymore, we need to find a solution or we remove it from the archive. This is more workload for Ubuntu Developers. If you take care about your packages, you could as well apply as Ubuntu developer, if you want to see your software inside Ubuntu. But from what I see since the last years we have REVU in place, that many packages are not maintained well enough, and many Ubuntu Developers are busy with the packages we merge/sync from Debian during release cycles, so there is no time or no desire to deal with ubuntu only uploaded packages (minus the packages who are ubuntu only but are needed for the Ubuntu OS in general). And really, this is no stereotype, but reality. And it does not only apply for Ubuntu, but for Debian, Fedora or openSuSE or whatever distro is out there. Regards, \sh -- | Stephan '\sh' Hermann| OSS Dev / SysAdmin | | JID: s...@linux-server.org | http://www.sourcecode.de/ | | GPG ID: 0xC098EFA8 | http://leonov.tv/ | | FP: 3D8B 5138 0852 DA7A B83F DCCB C189 E733 C098 EFA8 | -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
[Bug 533508] Re: apache2 crashed with SIGSEGV in sapi_getenv()
Hi guys, the duplicate is wrong here...it's a bug in PHP5 actually not able to add include_paths in addititional configs for php5 when include_path is not uncomment in php.ini. Read about it here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497453 I'll move the bug to the php5 package where it belongs. Regards, \sh ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #497453 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497453 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 531706 apache2 crashed with SIGSEGV in sapi_getenv() ** Package changed: apache2 (Ubuntu) = php5 (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- apache2 crashed with SIGSEGV in sapi_getenv() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 531706] Re: apache2 crashed with SIGSEGV in sapi_getenv()
The problem here is then if someone doesn't uncomment include_path in php.ini the zend-framework.ini The bug is known...and has nothing to do with zend-framework :) just uncomment include_path in php.ini and PHP5 doesn't crash anymore I wonder if upstream does know about this... Regards, \sh ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #497453 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497453 -- apache2 crashed with SIGSEGV in sapi_getenv() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 531706] Re: apache2 crashed with SIGSEGV in sapi_getenv()
Additional information: The real bug is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497453 Regards, \sh ** Changed in: zend-framework (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix -- apache2 crashed with SIGSEGV in sapi_getenv() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 531706] Re: apache2 crashed with SIGSEGV in sapi_getenv()
Ok, and now in real english ;) The problem here is if someone doesn't uncomment include_path in php.ini then zend-framework.ini 's add to include path doesn't work and php5 is crashing The bug is known...and has nothing to do with zend-framework :) just uncomment include_path in php.ini and PHP5 doesn't crash anymore I wonder if upstream does know about this... Regards, \sh -- apache2 crashed with SIGSEGV in sapi_getenv() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 533508] Re: apache2 crashed with SIGSEGV in sapi_getenv()
Hi guys, the duplicate is wrong here...it's a bug in PHP5 actually not able to add include_paths in addititional configs for php5 when include_path is not uncomment in php.ini. Read about it here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497453 I'll move the bug to the php5 package where it belongs. Regards, \sh ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #497453 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497453 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 531706 apache2 crashed with SIGSEGV in sapi_getenv() ** Package changed: apache2 (Ubuntu) = php5 (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- apache2 crashed with SIGSEGV in sapi_getenv() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 538426] Re: Please package Zend Framework Extras
Not for lucid anymore...will be done for lucid+1 and will be backported for lucid ** Changed in: zend-framework (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Stephan Hermann (shermann) -- Please package Zend Framework Extras https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538426 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 527666] Re: LVM Not mounting in Lucid
Hmmm... since the last dist-upgrade with new kernel, new initramfs-tools and new mountall package it works here for me... I'm trying to reproduce it somehow, because I think there is something like a timing race condition..I'm not sure -- LVM Not mounting in Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527666 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239674] Re: ucf and update-grub semantics are incompatible
@Sergey: but not in a real world datacenter ;) -- ucf and update-grub semantics are incompatible https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239674 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 527666] Re: LVM Not mounting in Lucid
I'm setting this from Incomplete to Confirmed. The reason is 1) what Deven said below (the instructions are somewhat not applyable to lucid) 2) We have at least two people hitting the very same problem (one of them is my person and the other one is amitk (check http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/03/08/%23ubuntu-devel.html) The way to reproduce: 1. create a VG 2. create a LV on the VG 3. Mount the LV via fstab and reboot your server (it happened on ubuntu lucid server flavour) 4. wait and see This is a regression from karmic and should be fixed before release. @bug triaging team: please set the correct regression tag (as I don't know the correct workflow) I wonder if we should move this bug from lvm2 to initramfs, because lvm2 in general does work as a charm...it's only the boot up area. ** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- LVM Not mounting in Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527666 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520715] Re: building ruby1.8 with pthread support causes puppet hangs
Guys, anything todo to give you some hands? I can support you regarding puppet, glibc, and hardware .. ( I know google has more then I will ever have, but we have some nice blades which need something to do...) Furthermore puppet + ubuntu == our way to work So, andrew, lucus, dokogive me something to test... regards, \sh -- building ruby1.8 with pthread support causes puppet hangs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 522106] Re: libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386
** Changed in: libunwind (Ubuntu) Assignee: Stephan Hermann (shermann) = (unassigned) -- libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522106 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 522106] Re: libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386
Oh well, I missed that in my heat ;) Ok, we can get rid of the -setjmp library I'm not sure if google-perftools (which is my only known pkg which I know depends on libunwind) will use it at all. Further investigation... can somone unsubscribe main sponsors, pls? thx, \sh ** Changed in: libunwind (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = In Progress ** Changed in: libunwind (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Stephan Hermann (shermann) -- libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522106 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 506010] Re: Not possible to set fragment size
will take care about it ** Changed in: network-manager-openvpn (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Stephan Hermann (shermann) -- Not possible to set fragment size https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 496654] Re: Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library
working on it ** Changed in: xenner (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Stephan Hermann (shermann) -- Ubuntu Server 9.10 (karmic): xenner: depends on non-existent library https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 523367] [NEW] Sync yafray 0.0.9+dfsg-4 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
Public bug reported:
Please sync yafray 0.0.9+dfsg-4 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped:
The last upload introduced a fix from Ilya, which is now in debian
(50_const_char_conversion.dpatch)
Changelog entries since current lucid version 0.0.9+dfsg-1ubuntu1:
yafray (0.0.9+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload
* Added hurd support (patch:80_hurd_support). Thanks a lot to Pino Toscano
for having send in the patch! (Closes: #568629).
* Removed Uploaders.
-- Ralf Treinen trei...@debian.org Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:40:48 +0100
yafray (0.0.9+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload.
* Fix FTBFS due to const char * to char * conversion, thanks to
Ilya Barygin for the patch (Closes: #549487)
+ added 50_const_char_conversion.dpatch
* Fix FTBFS on alpha, hppa, mips, mipsel and sparc (Closes: #564785)
+ added 60_sys_platform.dpatch
* Use env.Clone instead of env.Copy in linux-support.py
+ added 70_env.Clone_instead_of_env.Copy.dpatch
* Add ${misc:Depends} in yafray's Depends field
-- Mehdi Dogguy me...@debian.org Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:59:27 +0100
yafray (0.0.9+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Set maintainer to QA. Orphaning.
-- Nick Rusnov nickrus...@debian.org Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:12:45 -0800
** Affects: yafray (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: yafray (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: yafray (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Sync yafray 0.0.9+dfsg-4 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523367
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414247] Re: Please upgrade firmware-addon-dell to 2.2.1 version
moins, doesn't build... last lines of buildlog: Found files in /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages (must be in dist-packages for python2.6). debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell/biosHdr.py debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell/extract_bios_blacklist.pyc debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell/extract_bios_blacklist.py debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell/extract_bios_blacklist.pyo debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell/extract_common.py debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell/biosHdr.pyc debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell/__init__.py debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell/HelperXml.pyo debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell/__init__.pyo debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell/biosHdr.pyo debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell/extract_bios.py debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell/extract_common.pyo debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell/extract_bios.pyo debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell/dellbios.pyo debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell/HelperXml.pyc debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell/HelperXml.py debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell/extract_bios.pyc debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell/extract_common.pyc debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell/__init__.pyc debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell/dellbios.pyc debian/firmware-addon-dell/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/firmware_addon_dell/dellbios.py dh_builddeb: dpkg-deb --build debian/firmware-addon-dell .. returned exit code 1 make: *** [binary-makedeb-IMPL/firmware-addon-dell] Error 9 dpkg-buildpackage: error: /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status 2 ** Build finished at 20100217-2141 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- -- Please upgrade firmware-addon-dell to 2.2.1 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414247 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120923] Re: antennavis TkAnt crashes if no GW lines present in antenna file
working on it ** Changed in: antennavis (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: antennavis (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Stephan Hermann (shermann) -- antennavis TkAnt crashes if no GW lines present in antenna file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120923 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520281] Re: Please merge revelation-0.4.11-5 (universe) from Debian unstable
working on it ** Changed in: revelation (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: revelation (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Stephan Hermann (shermann) -- Please merge revelation-0.4.11-5 (universe) from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 338138] Re: When disk full revelation kills password db.
working on it ** Changed in: revelation (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = In Progress ** Changed in: revelation (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Stephan Hermann (shermann) -- When disk full revelation kills password db. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 392372] Re: cueconvert crashes when converting .toc to .cue
working on it ** Changed in: cuetools (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: cuetools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Stephan Hermann (shermann) -- cueconvert crashes when converting .toc to .cue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392372 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 492609] Re: potamus doesn't start
working on it ** Changed in: potamus (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: potamus (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Stephan Hermann (shermann) -- potamus doesn't start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492609 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 514786] Re: Please merge blam 1.8.7-1(universe) from debian squeeze(main)
** Changed in: blam (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: blam (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Stephan Hermann (shermann) -- Please merge blam 1.8.7-1(universe) from debian squeeze(main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 514786] Re: Please merge blam 1.8.7-1(universe) from debian squeeze(main)
It was already uploaded...*grmpf* ** Changed in: blam (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Released ** Changed in: blam (Ubuntu) Assignee: Stephan Hermann (shermann) = (unassigned) -- Please merge blam 1.8.7-1(universe) from debian squeeze(main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 519996] Re: Sync google-perftools 1.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
@Stefan: baeh...so a) fixing libunwind b) removing libunwind from P-a-S c) rebuild google-perftools baeh... @Roman/Reporter: would you like to do that? \sh -- Sync google-perftools 1.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 517277] Re: Please Build Packages for x86 and amd64
The problem, apart from P-a-S is that libunwind FTBFS. /usr/include/bits/setjmp2.h:26: error: 'longjmp' aliased to undefined symbol '_longjmp' which is also reported upstream: http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?28397 ** Bug watch added: Non-GNU Savannah Bug Tracker #28397 http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?28397 -- Please Build Packages for x86 and amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 522106] [NEW] libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386
Public bug reported: actual libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386 because of incompatiblities of libunwind and latest glibc. Fedora provided a fix for that. The next upload will add this fix for ubuntu, too. The next step will be that we tell buildd admins to un-P-a-S this package for i386 and amd64. Regards, \sh ** Affects: libunwind (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522106 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 522106] Re: libunwind ftbfs on amd64
The patch from Fedora you can find here: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/libunwind/libunwind-disable- setjmp.patch?view=log -- libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522106 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 519996] Re: Sync google-perftools 1.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Found the fix in fedoras rpm cvs. It's a sideissue with newer GLIBC See https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libunwind/+bug/522106 for the real bug ;) Uploaded a fixed libunwind already, and now we need to un-P-a-S libunwind for i386 and amd64 -- Sync google-perftools 1.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 522106] Re: libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386
** Summary changed: - libunwind ftbfs on amd64 + libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386 ** Attachment added: debdiff including patch to fix ftbfs http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39212923/libunwind_0.99-0.2ubuntu1.debdiff ** Changed in: libunwind (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- libunwind ftbfs on amd64 and i386 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522106 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 517277] Re: Please Build Packages for x86 and amd64
bug #522106 - ftbfs on amd64 and x86 - should be fixed with next upload. -- Please Build Packages for x86 and amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 517277] Re: Please Build Packages for x86 and amd64
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569952 - request to adjust the p-a-s file ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #569952 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569952 ** Also affects: libunwind (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569952 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Please Build Packages for x86 and amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520530] Re: Please merge ikiwiki 3.20100122 (universe) from debian unstable.
working on it ** Changed in: ikiwiki (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Stephan Hermann (shermann) -- Please merge ikiwiki 3.20100122 (universe) from debian unstable. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520530 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 519996] Re: Sync google-perftools 1.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Moins, the libunwind source is only build on ia64, not on amd64 neither on i386 https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libunwind/0.99-0.2 You are right, when you say, it should be build on all other archs. As Michael stated, please ask someone from the buildd admins team to unbreak libunwind to be accepted and build also for the other archs != ia64 Regards, \sh PS: I'm taking this bug pls update this report when we are able to have libunwind built on all other archs, Thx :) -- Sync google-perftools 1.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 519996] Re: Sync google-perftools 1.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
not removing sponsors, but assigning it to me. ** Changed in: google-perftools (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: google-perftools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Stephan Hermann (shermann) -- Sync google-perftools 1.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520562] Re: labyrinth crashed with ImportError in module()
Argl, sorry..was a mistake. Was the first time using the bzr way... anyways, added the patch and reuploaded -- labyrinth crashed with ImportError in module() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520562 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520562] Re: labyrinth crashed with ImportError in module()
** Changed in: labyrinth (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Stephan Hermann (shermann) -- labyrinth crashed with ImportError in module() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520562 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 519830] Re: gwibber crashed with TypeError in set_stream()
I can confirm this..this happened exactly the same way a the reporter described. ** Changed in: gwibber (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- gwibber crashed with TypeError in set_stream() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519830 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 387297] Re: manage-credentials should not ask for Launchpad password directly
Michael, that looks promising, do you want to make a stand alone widget out of it, or should I have a look at it? -- manage-credentials should not ask for Launchpad password directly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387297 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 506908] Re: Upstart job for pcscd
** Changed in: pcsc-lite (Ubuntu) Assignee: Stephan Hermann (shermann) = (unassigned) -- Upstart job for pcscd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 339257] Re: Twitux deals badly with missized images
twitux (0.69-0ubuntu2) lucid; urgency=low * Fixed bug with avatar image resizing. - Bug #339257 * Fixed issue with avatars using the same name overwriting one another. - Bug #412390 Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:10:13 + Changed-By: Mark East m...@markeast.co.uk Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com Signed-By: Stephan Hermann s...@sourcecode.de https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/twitux/0.69-0ubuntu2 ** Changed in: twitux (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Released ** Changed in: twitux (Ubuntu) Assignee: Stephan Hermann (shermann) = (unassigned) -- Twitux deals badly with missized images https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339257 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520378] Re: small packaging issues
working on it ** Changed in: openct (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: openct (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Stephan Hermann (shermann) -- small packaging issues https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520378 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520378] Re: small packaging issues
Andreas, thx for the debdiff, I adjusted it to match lucids version, so we can backport it. Regards, \sh -- small packaging issues https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520378 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
