Re: Debian package shasta: source location moved

[Steve Langasek]

Thanks for the information.  For reference, Ubuntu pulls shasta from Debian
rather than upstream directly, so as long as you've also informed the
Debian maintainer, Ubuntu should have no problems!

On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 10:32:46AM -0800, Paolo Carnevali wrote:
> I am the main developer of the source code for Debian package shasta.
> I wanted to let you that the original GitHub repository
>  containing Shasta source code
> has been phased out and Shasta development is continuing on this new
> repository:
> 
> https://github.com/paoloshasta/shasta
> 
> Please use this new repository for future releases.
> 
> I will continue Shasta development as GitHub user paoloshasta (email
> address pacar...@ucsc.edu, copied here). I will lose my current email
> address pa...@chanzuckerberg.com and I will no longer use my
> paoloczi GitHub account.
> 
> Thank you for including Shasta as a Debian repository. Your work on that is
> highly appreciated.
> 
> Paolo Carnevali
> Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (until 12/31/2022)
> University of California at Santa Cruz, Genomics Institute

> -- 
> Ubuntu-motu mailing list
> Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu


-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer   https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu

LibGeos for Ubuntu 22.04 breaks code / improperly configured?

[Basile Czajkowski]

Hello,

I am writing to You with a question about libgeos package available for
Ubuntu 22.04.

Currently apt install provides system with version 3.10.2 of libgeos.

However this breaks code that worked previously with libgeos 3.8.0

As described in this issue :
https://github.com/libgeos/geos/issues/760

It seems that building libgeos from source solves the issue even though
source for required classes has not changed. Given the extensive
configuration of package could it be possible that available package in
Ubuntu repository would break code?
If so, when would the updated version of libgeos (3.11.1) appear in Ubuntu
repository?

Thank You in advance

Cheers

Basile Czajkowski
-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu

Debian package shasta: source location moved

[Paolo Carnevali]

I am the main developer of the source code for Debian package shasta.
I wanted to let you that the original GitHub repository
 containing Shasta source code
has been phased out and Shasta development is continuing on this new
repository:

https://github.com/paoloshasta/shasta

Please use this new repository for future releases.

I will continue Shasta development as GitHub user paoloshasta (email
address pacar...@ucsc.edu, copied here). I will lose my current email
address pa...@chanzuckerberg.com and I will no longer use my
paoloczi GitHub account.

Thank you for including Shasta as a Debian repository. Your work on that is
highly appreciated.

Paolo Carnevali
Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (until 12/31/2022)
University of California at Santa Cruz, Genomics Institute
-- 
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu