Re: Install (auto-resize) in Lubuntu Desktop
Hi Warren, I've just asked... you should only see that if you are on a laptop. We'll amend the test case. If you ARE using a laptop, then it is a valid bug. Regards, Phill. On 25 September 2012 22:11, Phill Whiteside wrote: > Hi Warren, > > as it is a required part of the test case [1], please report it as a bug > 'fail'. (It should be raised against ubiquity). I've cc'd the mailing list > so someone should be able to quickly confirm it. > > Regards, > > Phill. > 1. http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/testcases/1301/info > > > On 25 September 2012 21:47, Warren Clemmons wrote: > >> Phill >> >> I think the problem might be my USB drive. I tried another USB stick and >> did not get these errors. >> But there is a Ubiquity issue on the 'Preparing to Install Lubuntu >> Screen' the is plugged to a power source is missing. At least now I can >> start reporting bugs. >> >> Thanks >> warren >> >> >> > > > -- > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw > -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: Install (auto-resize) in Lubuntu Desktop
Hi Warren, as it is a required part of the test case [1], please report it as a bug 'fail'. (It should be raised against ubiquity). I've cc'd the mailing list so someone should be able to quickly confirm it. Regards, Phill. 1. http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/testcases/1301/info On 25 September 2012 21:47, Warren Clemmons wrote: > Phill > > I think the problem might be my USB drive. I tried another USB stick and > did not get these errors. > But there is a Ubiquity issue on the 'Preparing to Install Lubuntu Screen' > the is plugged to a power source is missing. At least now I can start > reporting bugs. > > Thanks > warren > > > -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: Beta 2 Testing -- Unity and ISO Testing!
Hi Komputes, you may want to get a headache, it does appear that 2.15 is available [1]. Again, I'm well out of my area of expertise and you may want to check on the server area of ubuntu forums[2] to get some one to check! hope that helps, Phill. 1. http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.15 2. http://ubuntuforums.org/forumdisplay.php?f=339 On 25 September 2012 21:05, komputes wrote: > On 09/25/2012 03:21 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > > are you using the latest VB? (Currently at 4.2.0-80737). > > I am using virtualbox-4.1 from their website. 4.2 requires libc6 >= 2.15 > and lucid ships with libc6 2.11. > > -- > -komputes > > (]( -. .- )[) > -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: Beta 2 Testing -- Unity and ISO Testing!
On 09/25/2012 03:21 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: > are you using the latest VB? (Currently at 4.2.0-80737). I am using virtualbox-4.1 from their website. 4.2 requires libc6 >= 2.15 and lucid ships with libc6 2.11. -- -komputes (]( -. .- )[) -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: Beta 2 Testing -- Unity and ISO Testing!
hi komputes, are you using the latest VB? (Currently at 4.2.0-80737). I have in the past had issues with 'Guest Additions' fighting with my kernel. hopefully someone more familiar with VB can chip in and comment (I now use KVM[2]). Regards, Phill. 1. https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Linux_Downloads 2. https://help.ubuntu.com/community/KVM/Installation On 25 September 2012 20:00, komputes wrote: > On 09/24/2012 04:55 PM, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: > > Yikes! It's here. Thanks to everyone who's been working on our > > testcases. Those of your who use the tracker will notice the new > > changes. Thanks again to everyone's work on this. > > > > So, the beta2 images will be landing shortly on the tracker and will be > > ready for testing. In addition to this, there's a chance to do some > > Unity Testing. If you've been wanting to help this cycle, but want > > something easy and quick, this is it! All you need is a beta2 image, > > which you can boot to a live session, or install in a VM. If your > > running quantal, make sure you up to date. In all cases you will already > > have Unity 6.6. What is needed next then is to have a look at the > > testcases here -- specifically the 2 marked as 'mandatory'. They aren't > > difficult to complete and will help ensure unity and the new suggestions > > feature is working well: > > > > > http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/237/builds/23813/testcases > > > > > > And of course, the beta2 images: > > > > http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/238/builds > > > > Happy Testing everyone! Let's help polish quantal and make sure it's > > something we all as a community can be proud of on release day. > > > > Nicholas > > > > > > > > > I'm testing 12.10 Beta2 on Virtualbox on a 10.04 host and whenever the > VM boots it freezes the host. > > I have an MSI all in one, and when I boot 12.10 Beta2 on there it > freezes on SYSLINUX Loading... After rebooting the BIOS no longer sees > the USB disk. > > Does anyone else experience either of these this? Any recommendations on > how to proceed? > > -- > -komputes > > (]( -. .- )[) > > -- > Ubuntu-qa mailing list > Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa > -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: Beta 2 Testing -- Unity and ISO Testing!
On 09/24/2012 04:55 PM, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: > Yikes! It's here. Thanks to everyone who's been working on our > testcases. Those of your who use the tracker will notice the new > changes. Thanks again to everyone's work on this. > > So, the beta2 images will be landing shortly on the tracker and will be > ready for testing. In addition to this, there's a chance to do some > Unity Testing. If you've been wanting to help this cycle, but want > something easy and quick, this is it! All you need is a beta2 image, > which you can boot to a live session, or install in a VM. If your > running quantal, make sure you up to date. In all cases you will already > have Unity 6.6. What is needed next then is to have a look at the > testcases here -- specifically the 2 marked as 'mandatory'. They aren't > difficult to complete and will help ensure unity and the new suggestions > feature is working well: > > http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/237/builds/23813/testcases > > > And of course, the beta2 images: > > http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/238/builds > > Happy Testing everyone! Let's help polish quantal and make sure it's > something we all as a community can be proud of on release day. > > Nicholas > > > I'm testing 12.10 Beta2 on Virtualbox on a 10.04 host and whenever the VM boots it freezes the host. I have an MSI all in one, and when I boot 12.10 Beta2 on there it freezes on SYSLINUX Loading... After rebooting the BIOS no longer sees the USB disk. Does anyone else experience either of these this? Any recommendations on how to proceed? -- -komputes (]( -. .- )[) -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: "The crash belongs to a package that is not installed." ???
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 09:44:25AM +0200, Gabor Toth wrote: > Just a question here. > > From time to time I get a system crash window popping up and saying > that there was a crash. I click on send the report - of course - and > then it comes up with another window saying "The crash belongs to a > package that is not installed." > > I do not get it. How can a package crash that is not even installed? > Can anyone light my way in this? Knowing what the contents of /var/crash is would be helpful in determining which application crashed. For example: /var/crash/_usr_share_apport_apportcheckresume.1000.crash indicates the application /usr/share/apport/apportcheckresume crashed and I know that is a part of apport. (You could check via dpkg -S /usr/share/apport/apportcheckresume.) Then I can use apt-cache policy to see if apport is installed: apport: Installed: 2.5.2-0ubuntu4 Candidate: 2.5.2-0ubuntu4 -- Brian Murray Ubuntu Bug Master -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: Beta 2 Testing -- Unity and ISO Testing!
Thanks Nicholas. Tested i386 beta1 using virtualbox - will continue testing amd64 image on the h/w. compiz crash message (random) is seen after opening and closing Firefox, gedit etc. Vasu Vasudevan Kottilil vasudeva...@gmail.com On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Nicholas Skaggs < nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> wrote: > Vasudevan, yes, run a sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade > first. You'll get updated to the proper version of unity > > $ unity --version > unity 6.6.0 > > You want it to say Unity 6.6 :-) > > Nicholas > > > On 09/24/2012 07:05 PM, Vasudevan Kottilil wrote: > > Hi, > I am running quantal beta1 (i386 desktop image in virtual box 4.2 on Mac > OS X 10.6.8)and not able to see the three categories under > dash/application-lens (unity lenses test case 1448, step#2) > recently used apps > installed > apps available for download > > After clicking on Dash Home, it shows only one row of applications under > the search bar. Is it supposed to show these categories right away after > installation or do we need to install some more packages? > > Also getting a pop up 'Application Compiz has closed unexpectedly' - but > not able to consistently reproduce it - saw it 4-5 times. > > Thanks for the testing opportunity, > Vasu > > Vasudevan Kottilil > vasudeva...@gmail.com > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Nicholas Skaggs < > nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> Yikes! It's here. Thanks to everyone who's been working on our >> testcases. Those of your who use the tracker will notice the new changes. >> Thanks again to everyone's work on this. >> >> So, the beta2 images will be landing shortly on the tracker and will be >> ready for testing. In addition to this, there's a chance to do some Unity >> Testing. If you've been wanting to help this cycle, but want something easy >> and quick, this is it! All you need is a beta2 image, which you can boot to >> a live session, or install in a VM. If your running quantal, make sure you >> up to date. In all cases you will already have Unity 6.6. What is needed >> next then is to have a look at the testcases here -- specifically the 2 >> marked as 'mandatory'. They aren't difficult to complete and will help >> ensure unity and the new suggestions feature is working well: >> >> >> http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/237/builds/23813/testcases >> >> And of course, the beta2 images: >> >> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/238/builds >> >> Happy Testing everyone! Let's help polish quantal and make sure it's >> something we all as a community can be proud of on release day. >> >> Nicholas >> >> -- >> Ubuntu-qa mailing list >> Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa >> >> > > > > -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Ubuntu Studio 12.10 Beta 2 testing and testcase rewrite
Hi folks! We are now getting to the final stages of Ubuntu Studio 12.10 development. Now comes Beta 2, the only beta before RC and Final release:) It will be released on Thursday and it is time to find help on testing the ISOs. Go to [1], click "Ubuntu Studio DVD (architecture)" and follow the testcases there. You may have noticed that now it has 4 testcases instead of 2. It is just a testcase reorganization in the QA Team don't worry:) If you have never done testing before [2] is an excellent guide to start:) BTW we are working on a testcase rewrite. We want help to write a testcase that will focus on post-installation testing, especially in multimedia creation and audio. Edit [3] to give your ideas. The suggestion will be put into [4] so that you can actually have a preview of it. Find me on #ubuntustudio-devel or #ubuntu-testing to find help:) I thank you all for helping us to build a better Ubuntu Studio and wish you a happy testing! Regards, Howard Chan (smartboyhw) P.S. If you have hardware that support 64-bit please test 64-bit. In the last few rounds we discovered that 32-bit testing is more popular. Links: [1] http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/238/builds [2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/ [3] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/QuantalTestcaseUpdates/UbuntuStudioTestcase [4] http://packages.qa.dev.stgraber.org/qatracker/milestones/225/builds/16300/testcases/1336/results -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
RE: [Lubuntu-qa] improved script for burning cds
But I need to have read-write access. Right? From: sanchitgang...@outlook.com To: carsrcoffin...@yahoo.com; ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: RE: [Lubuntu-qa] improved script for burning cds Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:59:47 +0530 Yeah, I wanted to do the same but didn't have much time. I'll push it to your repo. :) > Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 01:24:34 -0700 > From: maps.backw...@gmail.com > To: sanchitgang...@outlook.com > Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] improved script for burning cds > > thx! a query: don't you think it might make more sense for people that want > to both grab the most recent version and contribute to its further > development to push the commit to my own repo? if not, maybe i'll just copy > and paste the changes in but figure it might be better to do it in the more > expected manner XD > > wxl > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 22:55:31 +0530 > Sanchit Gangwar wrote: > > > I've modified the script to include USBs. I've not tested it, so if you > > face any problems please let me know. I can add support for other Ubuntu > > flavours and architectures, if anybody wants me to. > > > > Here's the URL: > > https://github.com/sanchitgangwar/scripts/blob/master/grabAndBurnTestingISO.sh > > > > Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:07:03 -0400 > > From: nicholas.ska...@canonical.com > > To: carsrcoffin...@yahoo.com > > Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] improved script for burning cds > > CC: lubuntu...@lists.launchpad.net; ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 09/22/2012 03:24 AM, ∅ wrote: > > > > > > > > can you all believe we are less than FOUR WEEKS away from release? > > > > if you haven't been putting your heart and soul into testing, now is the > > time! > > > > to that end, i posted up a script to the lubuntu-qa list recently to grab > > the iso, verify it against published values, burn a cd, and then verify it > > against the iso. there were a few errors in it which i have corrected. > > > > i have also made the script more extensible so later when someone wants to > > make it work for every other derivative and architecture out there it > > should be easy breezy. i also put it on github so feel free to contribute > > to the development of this script for all us, especially if you're partial > > to some other architechture or derivative. > > > > i would have added some of the obvious ones but the file structure and > > available archs are so different for each derivative, i figured it would be > > best for someone with specific experience to take the reigns. > > > > so with no further ado: > > https://github.com/wxl/scripts/blob/master/make-ubuntu-iso.sh > > > > enjoy and keep on testing! > > > > wxl > > > > > > > > More options are always excellent! ∅ > > care to modify to push the image to a usb drive instead of cd? :-) > > > > > > > > Nicholas > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ubuntu-qa mailing list > > Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com > > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa > > > > -- > -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
RE: [Lubuntu-qa] improved script for burning cds
Yeah, I wanted to do the same but didn't have much time. I'll push it to your repo. :) > Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 01:24:34 -0700 > From: maps.backw...@gmail.com > To: sanchitgang...@outlook.com > Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] improved script for burning cds > > thx! a query: don't you think it might make more sense for people that want > to both grab the most recent version and contribute to its further > development to push the commit to my own repo? if not, maybe i'll just copy > and paste the changes in but figure it might be better to do it in the more > expected manner XD > > wxl > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 22:55:31 +0530 > Sanchit Gangwar wrote: > > > I've modified the script to include USBs. I've not tested it, so if you > > face any problems please let me know. I can add support for other Ubuntu > > flavours and architectures, if anybody wants me to. > > > > Here's the URL: > > https://github.com/sanchitgangwar/scripts/blob/master/grabAndBurnTestingISO.sh > > > > Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:07:03 -0400 > > From: nicholas.ska...@canonical.com > > To: carsrcoffin...@yahoo.com > > Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] improved script for burning cds > > CC: lubuntu...@lists.launchpad.net; ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 09/22/2012 03:24 AM, ∅ wrote: > > > > > > > > can you all believe we are less than FOUR WEEKS away from release? > > > > if you haven't been putting your heart and soul into testing, now is the > > time! > > > > to that end, i posted up a script to the lubuntu-qa list recently to grab > > the iso, verify it against published values, burn a cd, and then verify it > > against the iso. there were a few errors in it which i have corrected. > > > > i have also made the script more extensible so later when someone wants to > > make it work for every other derivative and architecture out there it > > should be easy breezy. i also put it on github so feel free to contribute > > to the development of this script for all us, especially if you're partial > > to some other architechture or derivative. > > > > i would have added some of the obvious ones but the file structure and > > available archs are so different for each derivative, i figured it would be > > best for someone with specific experience to take the reigns. > > > > so with no further ado: > > https://github.com/wxl/scripts/blob/master/make-ubuntu-iso.sh > > > > enjoy and keep on testing! > > > > wxl > > > > > > > > More options are always excellent! ∅ > > care to modify to push the image to a usb drive instead of cd? :-) > > > > > > > > Nicholas > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ubuntu-qa mailing list > > Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com > > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa > > > > -- > -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
"The crash belongs to a package that is not installed." ???
Just a question here. >From time to time I get a system crash window popping up and saying that there >was a crash. I click on send the report - of course - and then it comes up >with another window saying "The crash belongs to a package that is not >installed." I do not get it. How can a package crash that is not even installed? Can anyone light my way in this? Thanks. -- Gabor Toth gabor...@gmail.com -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
