Re: Question
Gabor, this link should show you any submissions you created: https://launchpad.net/~/+hwdb-submissions Does that answer your question? Nicholas On 10/02/2012 03:58 PM, Gabor Toth wrote: While doing Laptop testing I could not find how to get hold of my hardware profile that I have created with Checkbox. Anyone can show me to the right direction? Thanks, -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: A Question
Akhila, yep note the bug number and place it in the bug list. If you continue to see the bug over many builds, consider mentioning it here to raise the visibility of the bug (assuming it's of a critical nature). Has your bug been confirmed? Nicholas On 08/29/2012 10:21 AM, D Akhila Hegde wrote: Greetings! Just a quick question. How to file a result when a testcase is successfully executed and still has a previously raised bug? Just commenting with the bug number enough? -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: question
Mine is stable since Alpha 1. No issue...running smoothly on Dell Vostro 1450 Fauzi On 08/28/2012 01:54 PM, Ho Wan Chan wrote: Er, the Alpha and the Beta builds are more stable. However due to Feature Freeze and UserInterfaceFreeze and Beta 1 Freeze the daily builds may be very unstable. Indeed some Ubuntu distros may even experience image build problems in this week. Thankfully by next week as we test Beta 1 it will be more stable. 2012/8/28 Scott Lewin scott.aw.le...@gmail.com mailto:scott.aw.le...@gmail.com On 12-08-27 04:06 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: Hi, 12.10 has been quite stable, but as with any development release it can break with no notice! Please do not use it on a production machine. On 27 August 2012 20:56, Angel Dreams angelofdreams2...@gmail.com mailto:angelofdreams2...@gmail.com mailto:angelofdreams2...@gmail.com mailto:angelofdreams2...@gmail.com wrote: how stable is 12.10 or still alot of bugs in it The experience with Alpha and Beta systems really is different for each computer or device. For myself, up until the last couple days I have found 12.10 to be very unstable with constant crashes on many programs including compiz which was crashing every 20 minutes. -- Your friend, Scott Sent from a computer using Ubuntu Linux 12.10 -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com mailto:Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: question
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 14:56 -0500, Angel Dreams wrote: how stable is 12.10 or still alot of bugs in it At today is clean, but tomorrow ?? Who can tell... -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: question
12.10 is certainly more stable than 12.04 on my Dell, which is still plagued with crashes (colord, Gimp, Firefox, Nautilus) and this week, a new regular crash in smbd! Apport struggles to keep up, bless it. I may move over to 12.10 early. Lets make it a good one, folks. -- Rgds RC Robin Catling Full Circle Podcast On 27 August 2012 21:03, Fabio Marconi marconifa...@hotmail.it wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 14:56 -0500, Angel Dreams wrote: how stable is 12.10 or still alot of bugs in it At today is clean, but tomorrow ?? Who can tell... -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: question
Hi, 12.10 has been quite stable, but as with any development release it can break with no notice! Please do not use it on a production machine. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Activities has more details on how the test sequence goes. Regards, Phill. On 27 August 2012 20:56, Angel Dreams angelofdreams2...@gmail.com wrote: how stable is 12.10 or still alot of bugs in it -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa -- https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: question
On 12-08-27 04:06 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: Hi, 12.10 has been quite stable, but as with any development release it can break with no notice! Please do not use it on a production machine. On 27 August 2012 20:56, Angel Dreams angelofdreams2...@gmail.com mailto:angelofdreams2...@gmail.com wrote: how stable is 12.10 or still alot of bugs in it The experience with Alpha and Beta systems really is different for each computer or device. For myself, up until the last couple days I have found 12.10 to be very unstable with constant crashes on many programs including compiz which was crashing every 20 minutes. -- Your friend, Scott Sent from a computer using Ubuntu Linux 12.10 -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: Ask Ubuntu Question on Volume.
I sent a reply -- basically we need to determine if it's something that is broken in config, or with pulseaudio. There's a new upstream version he can test, and we can see if the older version of the audio stack works for him. Finally, thew pulseaudio folks will likely have asome tweaks to try. Nicholas On 08/12/2012 10:45 PM, John Kim wrote: Is there a way to solve this? Volume jumps to 100% when inserting or removing headphones http://askubuntu.com/q/175121/71219?sem=2 -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
A question
Hi, QA, A couple of people have stated that Lubuntu is not 'really' on the ISO testing area, one simple example would be http://qa.ubuntu.com/ which does not even list xubuntu? I am struggling to send people who would like to get involved in QA when they return to me to say the site does not work. If there are any wiki edits that you need to live and active pages I would be more than happy to get them there. (I also have a gang of people who would love this in their resumee). Regards, Phill. -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: A question
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 15:11, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote: Hi, QA, A couple of people have stated that Lubuntu is not 'really' on the ISO testing area, one simple example would be http://qa.ubuntu.com/ which does not even list xubuntu? That's because, I believe, that Lubuntu is not an official port, unlike Xubuntu and Kubuntu. I could be wrong there, but that's my understanding of it. As for Xubuntu, I don't understand what you mean. http://qa.ubuntu.com doesn't list anything because it's a blog ;-) However, the ISO section at http://qa.ubuntu.com/testing/iso-testing/ clearly shows Xubuntu in the explanation. Perhaps you actually want to show them http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com , the actual ISO tracker. Though keep in mind that that's only active at Milestones and Release. The ISO tracker provides info and test cases for Ubuntu, Xubuntu, Kubuntu, Edubuntu, Mythbuntu, Ubuntu-Server and a few others. I am struggling to send people who would like to get involved in QA when they return to me to say the site does not work. What does not work? Is the site too difficult to understand? Are the explanations at http://qa.ubuntu.com not clear enough, or difficult to find? That's a pretty generic statement and if there is a problem that's turning away potential QA volunteers, it would be nice to know exactly what's broken so the team can work on fixing it. If there are any wiki edits that you need to live and active pages I would be more than happy to get them there. (I also have a gang of people who would love this in their resumee). We'd love to have them! If they have problems, the first thing to do is join the ubuntu-qa list and ask questions there. It's not USENET, no one's going to start cussing and screaming at teh n00bs. Or hop on Freenode IRC and join #ubuntu-quality, though for newbie questions, I prefer e-mail as IRC is not always a guarantee depending on your time zone. Cheers, jeff -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: A question
Jeff, Lubuntu is an official port, starting this cycle. More on that here[1]. Cheers, James Gifford http://jamesrgifford.com [1] http://lubuntu.net/blog/lubuntu-track-official-status-ubuntu-flavour [1] http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/05/lubuntu-made-official-ubuntu-derivative/ On 08/12/2011 03:27 PM, Jeff Lane wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 15:11, Phill Whitesidephi...@ubuntu.com wrote: Hi, QA, A couple of people have stated that Lubuntu is not 'really' on the ISO testing area, one simple example would be http://qa.ubuntu.com/ which does not even list xubuntu? That's because, I believe, that Lubuntu is not an official port, unlike Xubuntu and Kubuntu. I could be wrong there, but that's my understanding of it. As for Xubuntu, I don't understand what you mean. http://qa.ubuntu.com doesn't list anything because it's a blog ;-) However, the ISO section at http://qa.ubuntu.com/testing/iso-testing/ clearly shows Xubuntu in the explanation. Perhaps you actually want to show them http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com , the actual ISO tracker. Though keep in mind that that's only active at Milestones and Release. The ISO tracker provides info and test cases for Ubuntu, Xubuntu, Kubuntu, Edubuntu, Mythbuntu, Ubuntu-Server and a few others. I am struggling to send people who would like to get involved in QA when they return to me to say the site does not work. What does not work? Is the site too difficult to understand? Are the explanations at http://qa.ubuntu.com not clear enough, or difficult to find? That's a pretty generic statement and if there is a problem that's turning away potential QA volunteers, it would be nice to know exactly what's broken so the team can work on fixing it. If there are any wiki edits that you need to live and active pages I would be more than happy to get them there. (I also have a gang of people who would love this in their resumee). We'd love to have them! If they have problems, the first thing to do is join the ubuntu-qa list and ask questions there. It's not USENET, no one's going to start cussing and screaming at teh n00bs. Or hop on Freenode IRC and join #ubuntu-quality, though for newbie questions, I prefer e-mail as IRC is not always a guarantee depending on your time zone. Cheers, jeff -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: A question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 20:11:02 +0100 Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote: Hi, QA, A couple of people have stated that Lubuntu is not 'really' on the ISO testing area, one simple example would be http://qa.ubuntu.com/ which does not even list xubuntu? That site is the QA blog for Ubuntu. Xubuntu is actually a separate distribution and should not be part of the Ubuntu blog. I am struggling to send people who would like to get involved in QA when they return to me to say the site does not work. If there are any wiki edits that you need to live and active pages I would be more than happy to get them there. (I also have a gang of people who would love this in their resumee). Regards, Phill. I would suggest starting at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing or even https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam instead of the blog. To get involved in QA, one should get involved in either Bugsquad or Testing. Those are the two areas of QA for volunteers to get involved. - -- Charlie Kravetz Linux Registered User Number 425914 [http://counter.li.org/] Never let anyone steal your DREAM. [http://keepingdreams.com] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJORYgEAAoJEFNEIRz9dxbAPVoIAIAbP7MlRrOZ7obpR0+k37Nj 1trCUhwxg4tee3FJOqQ4DK4UwIkKKaY+Zizw77yumOSV+2ffDU3dk57dirkH2Nsn 8sGnQl7KQ/8ZFNEENDN2NYIMO4uTLGsvHHL3A9XoYTDNxduo1jyZnEGkav+79RHy sPrz5pEVoYbGl1uk63L7NlNJD2Xv/De8EndPgSbVePqRFAt5CYo4zJbPz+mSmu/k SNX2hktAP6jwfKQXnVe0CCLlOD2ifv/CMRV4NJqifbfGeCf7URC3Sh30NYcOd6zg E+cA5HFOJNjapedG0b7/JCtd6RWnwATkml3KfMzvDgTc6DEE8R7v2/KmQowV5gQ= =PBpw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: A question
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:30 PM, James Gifford ja...@jamesrgifford.com wrote: Jeff, Lubuntu is an official port, starting this cycle. More on that here[1]. I was wondering when Lubuntu would finally earn official status from Canonical. I've been using it for a while in VirtualBox. Its rather stable and runs very fast. After using it for a while, I prefer LXDE over XFCE now. When will the derivative be listed on the official website ubuntu.com? -- Michael Haney Mystic Island Solutions - IT Department -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: A question
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 15:30, James Gifford ja...@jamesrgifford.com wrote: Jeff, Lubuntu is an official port, starting this cycle. More on that here[1]. Cheers, James Gifford http://jamesrgifford.com [1] http://lubuntu.net/blog/lubuntu-track-official-status-ubuntu-flavour [1] http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/05/lubuntu-made-official-ubuntu-derivative/ that's awesome! glad to see that happen :) -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Maverick Alpha 1 Netbook question
Hello, I know this may sound like a bad question but I am curious on how someone is to get Maverick on a netbook? Do I need to somehow install 10.04 and then use sudo update-manager -d? Also, which netbooks work best with Ubuntu? I plan on finding one at a nearby store that will allow me to test the newest version since my desktop requires ndiswrapper. Thanks, Matthew Young I am a PC and I use Ubuntu 10.04 -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: Maverick Alpha 1 Netbook question
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 12:34 -0500, Matthew Young wrote: Hello, I know this may sound like a bad question but I am curious on how someone is to get Maverick on a netbook? Do I need to somehow install 10.04 and then use sudo update-manager -d? That would work, but there are more direct ways. If you go to http://www.ubuntu.com/netbook/get-ubuntu/download select your os, and click on the show me how button in step two, it will give you step by step instructions for creating a usb stick to boot the install/live image on. To download the actual development images, you can go go http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ Thanks, Paul Larson signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
Re: New Member Introduction Testing Wiki Mailing List URL Question - Take 2
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 23:28 +1100, Mitch Towner wrote: Hi. My name is Mitch. I have recently signed up to the Ubuntu Testing Team this mailing list, with the goal of trying to contribute back to Ubuntu. snip Hello and welcome! It sounds like you've got a lot of Ubuntu and QA experience already, which is fantastic! As I was reading through the mailing list archives, I read that it was suggested to another new team member to user test the wiki itself. I noticed a slight spelling mistake in the URL for for the ubuntu-testing mailing list have rectified that so it is no longer bringing up a 404 Error. But upon further reading of this mailing list archive I believe it may be better to change this mailing list URL to point to this ubuntu-qa mailing list instead of the seemingly inactive ubuntu-testing mailing list. The page on the wiki I am referring to is https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing . I was going to change this, but upon reading the TODO list (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/TODO) I noticed that there is possibly another mailing list (ubuntu-test...@l.u.c) so I was unsure what mailing list URL should be displayed on the Testing wiki page. Can someone please let me know what mailing list URL should be used so that I can change it? Thanks for the attention to detail. It seems to me that this list (ubuntu-qa) is the best one to point people to for the time being, so unless anyone else objects, please feel free to update the documentation on the wiki. I have just noticed that this is starting to become somewhat long-winded that was not my intention so I will stop writing this get back to reading more of the Testing wiki documentation :) I look forward to being able to help with testing within Ubuntu to finally be able to give something back to this awesome community. Excellent! Please speak up if you have any questions or suggestions, either here or in #ubuntu-testing on Freenode. And ISO testing will start up next week for Lucid Alpha 2 -- we can *always* use more help testing the ISOs. (Hint, hint ;) ) Kind Regards, Mitch Towner - rm Ronald McCollam -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
