Re: ISO manifest inconsistent with installed packages

2011-12-06 Thread Gema Gomez 
On 06/12/11 19:21, Aaron wrote:
> Well I'm happy to report that the installed applications from the LiveCD
> do indeed match the application manifest!
> 
> Sorry about that.

Nothing to be sorry about! I didn't know that either, so assumed that
the manifest was the right place to look.

So we should probably look at the packages that are installed on an
imaged installed by default, in the default language (i.e. English)
without Internet connection.

Good work, thanks for looking into this!
Gema


> 
> A
> 
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Aaron  > wrote:
> 
> I did not select to install any updates or third party applications,
> but I'm going to check this again on a LiveCD and see how the
> differences look.
> 
> Thanks for your time!
> 
> Aaron
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Jean-Baptiste Lallement
> mailto:jean-bapti...@ubuntu.com>> wrote:
> 
> On 12/06/2011 01:45 AM, Aaron wrote:
> 
> I am looking at how consistent the ISO manifest is with the
> actually
> installed packages in Precise.  The basic steps I did are:
> 
> 1. Download ISO from
> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/__daily-live/current/
> 
> (download with date stamp for today)  I did a install (not
> live cd) in
> VirtualBox.
> 
> 2. Download the manifest for the ISO (for i386 below is the
> path)
> (download with date stamp for today)
> 
> wget
> 
> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/__daily-live/current/precise-__desktop-i386.manifest
> 
> 
> 
> Just to clear a confusion here, the manifest on cdimage.u.c
> lists the contents of the live filesystem, not the installed
> filesystem.
> 
> Content of the live filesystem and a freshly installed system
> are different because, some packages on the Live CD are only
> useful to the Live CD and the installer, only the language (and
> langpacks) the user selects is installed, additional software
> can be installed (in your case virtualbox packages, but also
> flashplugin, codecs, updates, additional langpacks not on the
> CD, i386 packages due to multiarch support if you're installing
> on amd64 and need i386 libs, ...)
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jean-Baptiste
> irc: jibel
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ubuntu-qa mailing list
> Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com 
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/__mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Gema Gomez-Solano
QA Team  https://launchpad.net/~gema.gomez
Canonical Ltd.   http://www.canonical.com

-- 
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa

Re: ISO manifest inconsistent with installed packages

2011-12-06 Thread Aaron 
Well I'm happy to report that the installed applications from the LiveCD do
indeed match the application manifest!

Sorry about that.

A

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Aaron  wrote:

> I did not select to install any updates or third party applications, but
> I'm going to check this again on a LiveCD and see how the differences look.
>
> Thanks for your time!
>
> Aaron
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Jean-Baptiste Lallement <
> jean-bapti...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
>> On 12/06/2011 01:45 AM, Aaron wrote:
>>
>>> I am looking at how consistent the ISO manifest is with the actually
>>> installed packages in Precise.  The basic steps I did are:
>>>
>>> 1. Download ISO from 
>>> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/**daily-live/current/
>>> (download with date stamp for today)  I did a install (not live cd) in
>>> VirtualBox.
>>>
>>> 2. Download the manifest for the ISO (for i386 below is the path)
>>> (download with date stamp for today)
>>>
>>> wget
>>> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/**daily-live/current/precise-**
>>> desktop-i386.manifest
>>>
>>>  Just to clear a confusion here, the manifest on cdimage.u.c lists the
>> contents of the live filesystem, not the installed filesystem.
>>
>> Content of the live filesystem and a freshly installed system are
>> different because, some packages on the Live CD are only useful to the Live
>> CD and the installer, only the language (and langpacks) the user selects is
>> installed, additional software can be installed (in your case virtualbox
>> packages, but also flashplugin, codecs, updates, additional langpacks not
>> on the CD, i386 packages due to multiarch support if you're installing on
>> amd64 and need i386 libs, ...)
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste
>> irc: jibel
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ubuntu-qa mailing list
>> Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/**
>> mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
>>
>
>
-- 
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa

Re: ISO manifest inconsistent with installed packages

2011-12-06 Thread Aaron 
I did not select to install any updates or third party applications, but
I'm going to check this again on a LiveCD and see how the differences look.

Thanks for your time!

Aaron

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Jean-Baptiste Lallement <
jean-bapti...@ubuntu.com> wrote:

> On 12/06/2011 01:45 AM, Aaron wrote:
>
>> I am looking at how consistent the ISO manifest is with the actually
>> installed packages in Precise.  The basic steps I did are:
>>
>> 1. Download ISO from 
>> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/**daily-live/current/
>> (download with date stamp for today)  I did a install (not live cd) in
>> VirtualBox.
>>
>> 2. Download the manifest for the ISO (for i386 below is the path)
>> (download with date stamp for today)
>>
>> wget
>> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/**daily-live/current/precise-**
>> desktop-i386.manifest
>>
>>  Just to clear a confusion here, the manifest on cdimage.u.c lists the
> contents of the live filesystem, not the installed filesystem.
>
> Content of the live filesystem and a freshly installed system are
> different because, some packages on the Live CD are only useful to the Live
> CD and the installer, only the language (and langpacks) the user selects is
> installed, additional software can be installed (in your case virtualbox
> packages, but also flashplugin, codecs, updates, additional langpacks not
> on the CD, i386 packages due to multiarch support if you're installing on
> amd64 and need i386 libs, ...)
>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste
> irc: jibel
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-qa mailing list
> Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/**
> mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
>
-- 
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa

Re: ISO manifest inconsistent with installed packages

2011-12-06 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement 

On 12/06/2011 01:45 AM, Aaron wrote:

I am looking at how consistent the ISO manifest is with the actually
installed packages in Precise.  The basic steps I did are:

1. Download ISO from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/
(download with date stamp for today)  I did a install (not live cd) in
VirtualBox.

2. Download the manifest for the ISO (for i386 below is the path)
(download with date stamp for today)

wget
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/precise-desktop-i386.manifest

Just to clear a confusion here, the manifest on cdimage.u.c lists the 
contents of the live filesystem, not the installed filesystem.


Content of the live filesystem and a freshly installed system are 
different because, some packages on the Live CD are only useful to the 
Live CD and the installer, only the language (and langpacks) the user 
selects is installed, additional software can be installed (in your case 
virtualbox packages, but also flashplugin, codecs, updates, additional 
langpacks not on the CD, i386 packages due to multiarch support if 
you're installing on amd64 and need i386 libs, ...)



--
Jean-Baptiste
irc: jibel

--
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa

Re: ISO manifest inconsistent with installed packages

2011-12-06 Thread Gema Gomez 
Aaron, did you choose to update during install and install third party
software? Any of those two?

Gema

On 06/12/11 08:32, Brendan Donegan wrote:
> It won't be consistent, because you'll make some choices during
> installation that will affect which packages are actually installed. Not
> everything on the CD ends up in the installation of Ubuntu.
> 
> On 06/12/11 00:45, Aaron wrote:
>> I am looking at how consistent the ISO manifest is with the actually
>> installed packages in Precise.  The basic steps I did are:
>>
>> 1. Download ISO from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/
>> (download with date stamp for today)  I did a install (not live cd) in
>> VirtualBox.
>>
>> 2. Download the manifest for the ISO (for i386 below is the path)
>> (download with date stamp for today)
>>
>> wget
>> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/precise-desktop-i386.manifest
>>
>> 3.  Create installed package list:
>>
>> dpkg -l > dpkgl.txt
>>
>> 4. Strip out the Name and Version columns to separate file:
>>
>> awk '{print $2 , $3}' dpkgl.txt > dpkg-name-version.txt
>>
>> Diff the manifest and the current installed packages (with only the
>> name/version columns):
>>
>> diff --ignore-space-change precise-desktop-i386.manifest
>> dpkg-name-version.txt > diff2.txt
>>
>> All output from my process attached.  But here is the diff2.txt (below
>> and attached)
>>
>> It seems like the manifest is not reflecting 100% what is installed,
>> unless I am missing something?
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> First file is the 'precise-desktop-i386.manifest' and the second file
>> is the 'dpkg-name-version.txt' (which is the currently installed
>> packages via dpkg).
>>
-- 
Gema Gomez-Solano
QA Team  https://launchpad.net/~gema.gomez
Canonical Ltd.   http://www.canonical.com

-- 
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa

Re: ISO manifest inconsistent with installed packages

2011-12-06 Thread Brendan Donegan 
It won't be consistent, because you'll make some choices during 
installation that will affect which packages are actually installed. Not 
everything on the CD ends up in the installation of Ubuntu.


On 06/12/11 00:45, Aaron wrote:
I am looking at how consistent the ISO manifest is with the actually 
installed packages in Precise.  The basic steps I did are:


1. Download ISO from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/ 
(download with date stamp for today)  I did a install (not live cd) in 
VirtualBox.


2. Download the manifest for the ISO (for i386 below is the path) 
(download with date stamp for today)


wget 
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/precise-desktop-i386.manifest


3.  Create installed package list:

dpkg -l > dpkgl.txt

4. Strip out the Name and Version columns to separate file:

awk '{print $2 , $3}' dpkgl.txt > dpkg-name-version.txt

Diff the manifest and the current installed packages (with only the 
name/version columns):


diff --ignore-space-change precise-desktop-i386.manifest 
dpkg-name-version.txt > diff2.txt


All output from my process attached.  But here is the diff2.txt (below 
and attached)


It seems like the manifest is not reflecting 100% what is installed, 
unless I am missing something?


Thoughts?

First file is the 'precise-desktop-i386.manifest' and the second file 
is the 'dpkg-name-version.txt' (which is the currently installed 
packages via dpkg).


0a1,5
>
> 
Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend 


> Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err:
> Name Version
>
22d26
< apt-clone0.2.1
30d33
< archdetect-deb1.88ubuntu1
58d60
< btrfs-tools0.19+20100601-3ubuntu3
64d65
< casper1.292
67d67
< cifs-utils2:5.1-1ubuntu1
86d85
< cryptsetup2:1.1.3-4ubuntu3
106a106
> dkms 2.2.0.2-1ubuntu4
108d107
< dmraid1.0.0.rc16-4.1ubuntu4
117d115
< dpkg-repack1.36
122d119
< ecryptfs-utils93-0ubuntu2
136a134
> fakeroot 1.18.1-1
143d140
< firefox-locale-de9.0~b4+build1-0ubuntu2
145,147d141
< firefox-locale-es9.0~b4+build1-0ubuntu2
< firefox-locale-pt9.0~b4+build1-0ubuntu2
< firefox-locale-zh-hans9.0~b4+build1-0ubuntu2
205d198
< gir1.2-timezonemap-1.00.2.1
253d245
< gparted0.8.1-1ubuntu4
300a293
> hunspell-en-ca 1:3.3.0-2ubuntu3
302a296
> hyphen-en-us 2.7.1-4ubuntu1
337d330
< jfsutils1.1.15-1ubuntu1
343d335
< keyutils1.5.2-2
345,346d336
< language-pack-de1:11.10+20111006
< language-pack-de-base1:11.10+20111006
349,352d338
< language-pack-es1:11.10+20111006
< language-pack-es-base1:11.10+20111006
< language-pack-gnome-de1:11.10+20111006
< language-pack-gnome-de-base1:11.10+20111006
355,368d340
< language-pack-gnome-es1:11.10+20111006
< language-pack-gnome-es-base1:11.10+20111006
< language-pack-gnome-pt1:11.10+20111006
< language-pack-gnome-pt-base1:11.10+20111006
< language-pack-gnome-xh1:11.10+20111006
< language-pack-gnome-xh-base1:11.10+20111006
< language-pack-gnome-zh-hans1:11.10+20111006
< language-pack-gnome-zh-hans-base1:11.10+20111006
< language-pack-pt1:11.10+20111006
< language-pack-pt-base1:11.10+20111006
< language-pack-xh1:11.10+20111006
< language-pack-xh-base1:11.10+20111006
< language-pack-zh-hans1:11.10+20111006
< language-pack-zh-hans-base1:11.10+20111006
466,467d437
< libdebconfclient00.157ubuntu1
< libdebian-installer40.79ubuntu1
475d444
< libdmraid1.0.0.rc161.0.0.rc16-4.1ubuntu4
486d454
< libecryptfs093-0ubuntu2
592d559
< libgtkmm-2.4-1c2a1:2.24.2-1
712d678
< libnss3-1d3.12.9+ckbi-1.82-0ubuntu6
789d754
< libreadline55.2-11
798a764
> libreoffice-help-en-gb 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1
800a767,769
> libreoffice-l10n-common 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1
> libreoffice-l10n-en-gb 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1
> libreoffice-l10n-en-za 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1
864d832
< libtimezonemap10.2.1
969d936
< localechooser-data2.39ubuntu1
980d946
< lupin-casper0.50
1004a971,973
> myspell-en-au 2.1-5.3
> myspell-en-gb 1:3.3.0-2ubuntu3
> myspell-en-za 1:3.3.0-2ubuntu3
1005a975,976
> mythes-en-au 2.1-5.3
> mythes-en-us 1:3.3.0-2ubuntu3
1030a1002
> openoffice.org-common 1:3.3.0-7ubuntu5
1038a1011
> patch 2.6.1-2
1081d1053
< python-argparse1.2.1-1
1132d1103
< python-pyicu1.3-1
1157d1127
< python-xklavier0.4-2
1171d1140
< rdate1:1.2-4build1
1174d1142
< reiserfsprogs1:3.6.21-1build1
1228a1197,1199
> thunderbird-locale-en 1:9.0~b3+build1-0ubuntu2
> thunderbird-locale-en-gb 1:9.0~b3+build1-0ubuntu2
> thunderbird-locale-en-us 1:9.0~b3+build1-0ubuntu2
1248,1252d1218
< ubiquity2.9.5
< ubiquity-casper1.292
< ubiquity-frontend-gtk2.9.5
< ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu52
< ubiquity-ubuntu-artwork2.9.5
1276d1241
< unionfs-fuse0.24-2.1
1308d1272
< user-setup1.39ubuntu2
1315a1280,1282
> virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.6-dfsg-2
> virtualbox-guest-utils 4.1.6-dfsg-2
> virtualbox-guest-x11 4.1.6-dfsg-2
1316a1284
> wbritish 7.1-1
1344d1311
< xfsprogs3.1.5+nmu1






-- 
Ubuntu