Hi Brendan,
I think we could use the same doc, as discussed on the channel, maybe on
a separate tab?
Thanks,
Gema
On 21/12/11 11:38, Brendan Donegan wrote:
> Hi Gema,
>
> I should probably remember this, but should we use the Google Doc for
> new test cases (I've got some proper test cases for gnome-terminal in my
> head)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> On 21/12/11 11:32, Gema Gomez wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I have been doing some browsing of test cases in our wiki and found
>> these ones:
>> http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Applications/Terminal
>>
>> I was trying to figure out how to classify the test cases when we get
>> them into Case Conductor and realized, that in this case in particular,
>> the test cases are wrongly classified.
>>
>> Take for instance, ter-001 test case, it says it affects gnome-terminal,
>> and whilst I can see we are opening and closing the terminal, my
>> impression is that test case is targeting sudo, apt-get, ls and bash,
>> rather than the gnome-terminal.
>>
>> I think we need to start removing this kind of test case and adding
>> tests that actually target the packages we are trying to test, so that
>> if we decide to classify test cases based on the package they are
>> testing, we have a clear view of those. Another alternative is to add
>> all the affected packages to the list, not just the main one. I
>> understand this was difficult with the current wiki, but in Case
>> Conductor we will have more flexibility to assign test cases to more
>> than one package.
>>
>> I hope you all have a nice holiday!
>> Gema
>>
>>
>
>
--
Gema Gomez-Solano
Ubuntu QA Team https://launchpad.net/~gema.gomez
Canonical Ltd. http://www.canonical.com
--
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
