First set of 18.04.1 RC images ready for testing
The first set of builds for the first point release of Bionic (18.04.1) due this Thursday (July 26th) have been added to the tracker[1] for all flavours. These builds have bionic-proposed enabled and are not final. Despite of this, please test your images and do not wait for a "final" build to test. We need you testing now, iterating uploads to get your bugs fixed, filing bugs and escalating where you need help. Happy testing everyone, and here's hoping we push out another smooth and stress-free release on Thursday. [1] http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/392/builds JB -- Jean-Baptiste Lallement irc: jibel -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Fwd: Change of scope and target market for i386
Le 27/09/2017 à 13:53, Nicholas Skaggs a écrit : This means 32-bit images / tests can also be removed from the isotracker. Right but the tracker is made so that removing them for the development release would also remove them for previous releases and we still need them for Xenial point releases. JB. Nicholas -- Forwarded message -- From: Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@ubuntu.com> Date: Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 12:16 PM Subject: Re: Change of scope and target market for i386 To: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com>, ubuntu-release < ubuntu-rele...@lists.ubuntu.com>, Ubuntu Desktop Discussion < ubuntu-desk...@lists.ubuntu.com> Dear Release team, Please action the below and remove Ubuntu Desktop i386 daily-live images from the release manifest for Beta and Final milestones of 17.10 and therefore do not ship ubuntu-desktop-i386.iso artifact for 17.10. As a followup to this thread it has been confirmed that argumentation below is sound, and furthermore there is no longer any effective qa or testing of the desktop product on actual i386 hardware (explicitly non x86_64 CPUs). There are no other changes requested to d-i, mini.iso, archive, or the upgrade paths. Regards, Dimitri. On 3 May 2017 at 13:01, Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@ubuntu.com> wrote: ## NB! this is a mailing list for developers, and this is a _proposal_ that I want to discuss with the *buntu developers. There is no need to OMG this, especially since this is a recurring discussion every single development cycle for many years now... ## Hello, Currently Ubuntu provides many installation medias: * Ubuntu Core snappy architecture images * Cloud images * Container images * Server subiquity img/iso * Server classic img/iso * Desktop live * Netinst * Board-specific pre-installed builds i386 architecture is changing. It is no longer the default, nor most widely used architecture on the traditional form factors: desktop, laptop, rack servers. But i386 is becoming more of a purpose built architecture, similar to how in the past "embedded" devices label was applied. Today, I would call it an IoT; single purpose device; and a cloud/container guest architecture. Ubuntu website download pages have stopped advertising traditional i386 images for either desktop, server, or cloud, without any significant backslash and without any noticeable drops in the download rates. Therefore I would like to propose the following change of scope for the i386 architecture. = Continue to provide for i386 = * The Ubuntu archive with security updates * Ubuntu Core snappy architecture images * Cloud images * Container images * Server subiquity img/iso * netinst = Discontinue to provide for i386 = * Server classic img/iso * Desktop live = Rationale for change = The above images and scope for i386 will: * Expand and grow deployments in the IoT devices sector * continue to support the declining i386 classic desktop/server user base * Maintain support for minimal / workload-specific cloud deployments (cloud & container guests) = Flavors = Flavor leads and developers, please consider if the above structure would also be suitable for your target market and user bases. I.e. Continue to provide packages and the upgrade path, but discontinue to manufacture the i386 full-sized / live-cd installation media. -- Regards, Dimitri. -- Regards, Dimitri. -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desk...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop -- Jean-Baptiste Lallement Canonical Services Ltd. IRC: jibel -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: How to report bug in Ubuntu Dock
Hi Colin, Le 23/08/2017 à 18:08, Colin Law a écrit : Hi I am seeing a gnome-shell crash in the Ubuntu Dock shell extension on Artful. What package should I report that against? File them against gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock [1] either with the following command (preferred): ubuntu-bug gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock Or directly on launchpad with the 'report a bug' link [2] [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+filebug JB Colin -- Jean-Baptiste Lallement Canonical Services Ltd. IRC: jibel -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Ubuntu Artful Desktop July Shakedown
Hi Apurv Le 19/07/2017 à 09:20, Apurv Jyotirmay a écrit : I tried it off of a USB stick, and the experience wasn't smooth for me. Some theming issues with Gnome Software, then a delay in refreshing screen content on window resize, and then it all froze when I powered it down. Had to hard power reset my machine. Rest everything was okay. It was on X session. Thank you for your help testing Ubuntu. Did you file bugs describing the issues you faced? if you have time to do so, it would be very helpful. Don't forget to tag them 'julyshakedown' Thanks again. JB. On Jul 19, 2017 09:56, "chris hermansen" <clherman...@gmail.com <mailto:clherman...@gmail.com>> wrote: Alors Jean-Baptiste and everyone else on this list, On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Jean-Baptiste Lallement < jean-baptiste.lallem...@canonical.com <mailto:jean-baptiste.lallem...@canonical.com>> wrote: > Hi All, > > For anyone interested in testing the latest goodness that landed in > Artful, Popey just posted this > https://popey.com/blog/posts/ubuntu-artful-desktop-july-shakedown.html <https://popey.com/blog/posts/ubuntu-artful-desktop-july-shakedown.html> > > Happy testing! > > I commented on Popey's blog but just to reproduce my impressions here - WOW! a few very minor quibbles but no bugs and everything seems pretty usable right off the memory stick. VERY WELL DONE and congratulations to all. -- Chris Hermansen · clhermansen "at" gmail "dot" com C'est ma façon de parler. -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality> -- Jean-Baptiste Lallement irc: jibel -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Ubuntu Artful Desktop July Shakedown
Hi All, For anyone interested in testing the latest goodness that landed in Artful, Popey just posted this https://popey.com/blog/posts/ubuntu-artful-desktop-july-shakedown.html Happy testing! JB. -- Jean-Baptiste Lallement Canonical Services Ltd. IRC: jibel -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Launchpad Greasemonkey Scripts
Hi Brian, Le 19/11/2015 00:26, Brian Murray a écrit : I've worked on and use some greasemonkey scripts[1] that modify Launchpad and make some tasks easier. One of them, lp_button_tags, isn't currently working and I thought this would make a good Google Code In project. Having said that it wouldn't be very rewarding if I'm the only person still using these. So is anybody else still using these scripts? I still use them, especially the stock replies, the script that opens a dropdown with official tags, and I like the karma suffix. Maybe I use other gm scripts but it's been installed for so long that I think it's part of LP now :) JB. Or have you never heard of them and do you want the script which makes it easier to tag bugs working again? [1] https://launchpad.net/launchpad-gm-scripts Thanks! -- Brian Murray -- Jean-Baptiste Lallement irc: jibel -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Which package for server installer bug?
Hi, Le 01/11/2015 23:38, Istimsak Abdulbasir a écrit : On Nov 1, 2015 4:49 PM, "Colin Law" <clan...@gmail.com> wrote: Can someone advise which package a server installer bug should be reported against? I would think the installer itself. In otherwords, that installer program is the server using? You can file it against debian-installer https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+filebug JB. Cheers Colin -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality -- Jean-Baptiste Lallement irc: jibel -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
15.10 Final ISO Testing
Hi everyone! The release of 15.10 Wily Werewolf is due this week and candidate images are ready for testing on the ISO tracker. As usual everyone is welcome to participate to the image testing effort to ensure we have good test coverage. The procedures for testing ISO images and reporting results are explained on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/ISO/Procedures Sync the images and post your test results on the tracker at http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/ You'll need a Launchpad account to login on the tracker. Please register if you are new to this and let us know if you have any questions. Thank you very much for your help and happy testing! JB. -- Jean-Baptiste Lallement irc: jibel -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Error on testing ubiquity
Hi Shrinivasan, Thank you for looking into this, ubiquity tests needed some love :) On 30/07/2015 03:50, Shrinivasan T wrote: I wish to do some automated image testing. I downloaded latest ubuntu iso from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/ wily-desktop-amd64.iso Then did bzr branch lp:ubiquity on following this link http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-installer/ubiquity/trunk/view/head:/autopilot/README.md on running fakeroot debian/rules check getting many errors http://paste.ubuntu.com/11963424/ I tried on Wily and did not get any error. What is your version of pep8? Still, wanted to proceed further with the link provided. as per section On a local machine with the runner ran the following ./run-ubiquity-test ~/wily-desktop-amd64.iso Getting error messages and it failed. ‘/tmp/run-ubiquity-test.TCmxb8/ubiquity.ttyS0’ has become inaccessible: No such file or directory This is a harmless information message from 'tail' when the test does its cleanup. Full log here. http://paste.ubuntu.com/11963456/ The error is line 539 of your pastebin: /var/local/autopilot//logs//autopilot.log: ValueError: No treeview visible with globalRect Rectangle(211, 258, 137, 263) Daniel Kessel reported it in [2] Thanks, Jean-Baptiste. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/ [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1479064 -- Jean-Baptiste Lallement irc: jibel -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Utopic Final Testing Report
Hi all, The testing report for Utopic Final has been published to: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/ReleaseReports/UtopicFinalTestingReport Thanks to elfy, lbsolost, akxwi-dave, 952456204-6, qulei, jjfrv8, jr, zequence, finley-rob, walterorlin, larsnooden, nio-wiklund, phillw, carla-sella, paulw2u, slickymaster, adconrad, sgclark, truckinpapa, bluesabre, jcarruthers, apw, lyz, wxl, bogstad, amjjawad, mathieu-tl, oliviervdtoorn, marco-parillo, darkxst, davmor2, jprzybytek, mvo, civil-bigpond, bryanquigley, keithimyers, jan-varho, ptn107, frandieguez, kidsodateless, rcj, mgedmin, c-hermansen, skellat, blizzz, nskaggs, phillip-sz, unit193, shijing, jackyu, quintasan, derhaberer, jiri-podvolecky, octoquad, moter8, wkrekik, gridcube, hanhinen, vrruiz, artemgy, dsmythie, intherye and every one who helped testing this milestone! JB. -- Jean-Baptiste Lallement irc: jibel -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
12.04.5 testing report
Hi all, The testing report for 12.04.5 has been published to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/ReleaseReports/PrecisePoint5TestingReport Thanks to everyone who helped testing this release! JB. -- Jean-Baptiste Lallement irc: jibel -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
14.04.1 testing report
Hi all, The testing report for 14.04.1 has been published to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/ReleaseReports/TrustyPoint1TestingReport Thanks to everyone who helped testing this release! JB. -- Jean-Baptiste Lallement irc: jibel -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Trusty 14.04.1 Testing this week
Hi, On 22/07/2014 17:55, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: The first point release for trusty is releasing this week. This release will be the default upgrade path for precise users. The upgrade path from precise - trusty is important. Help with testing the images as well as upgrades is most appreciated.You will find builds appearing at the link below shortly. http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/318/builds All the images are on the tracker now. Note that all the flavors are LTS and need testing with a special attention to mythbuntu which missed the release last time. Additionally the download links are currently wrong on the tracker, for LTS they should contain the name of the release. For example, for ubuntu desktop amd64 the link on the tracker currently is: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/20140722.2/trusty-desktop-amd64.iso To get the right url insert trusty before /daily: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/trusty/daily-live/20140722.2/trusty-desktop-amd64.iso Another example with lubuntu: wrong: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/daily-live/20140722.2/trusty-desktop-amd64.iso correct: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/trusty/daily-live/20140722.2/trusty-desktop-amd64.iso JB. -- Jean-Baptiste Lallement irc: jibel -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Trusty Final testing report
Hi all, The testing report for Trusty Final has been published to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/ReleaseReports/TrustyFinalTestingReport Thank you to nio-wiklund, rohangarg, xnox, paulw2u, ricsipontaz, kitterman, lbsolost, corey.bryant, ghisvail, zulcss, pitti, zequence, nuclearbob, swarna-cse, quintasan, jibel, philipp-fent, dale-f-beaudoin, jr, maclin.jun, scottbomb, elfy, davmor2, akxwi-dave, wgrant, bryanquigley, texadactyl, gilir, cpatrick08, carla-sella, cshubhamrao, soee, fernan-domp, irihapeti, knome, f-jack, t-administrator-tcedi-com, james-page, apw, kidsodateless, pierre-equoy, jonathan, chris.gagnon, jprzybytek, larsnooden, cc-inc, jiaowen520li, walterorlin, jacqueline-patricia, wkrekik, stgraber, phillw, ubuntu-cdimage, adconrad, marco-parillo, valracine2001-one, nskaggs, valorie-zimmerman, timo-jyrinki and every one who helped testing this release! JB. -- Jean-Baptiste Lallement irc: jibel -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: libgdal1 required dependencies.
Hi Barris, Le 02/04/2014 22:10, Baris Ergun a écrit : Hi I am testing Ubuntu 14.04 64bit Desktop Edition. Lately tried to deploy postgresql database with postgis extension from http:// apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt by following the instructions here : http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/wiki/UsersWikiPostGIS21UbuntuPGSQL93Apt Obviously the page does not mention about the 14.04 which is still beta. What prevents me to install what I require seems to be the libgdal1 dependencies which also provided from the same repository. libgdal1 : Depends: libarmadillo2 (= 2.4.2) but it is not installable Depends: libepsilon0 but it is not installable Depends: libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 but it is not installable or libhdf5-1.8.4 but it is not installable Depends: libnetcdf6 but it is not installable Depends: libpoppler19 but it is not installable Depends: libspatialite3 (= 2.4.0~rc2) but it is not installable I have checked the Ubuntu repository for some of these libs and realised that they are not provided for Ubuntu 14.04 64 bit. Eg instead of libarmadillo2 - libarmadillo4 is available in the repository. Are there any plans to include those dependencies soon? I think the documentation you mentioned to install the package is not totally accurate and if you replace precise by trusty in the line: sudo sh -c 'echo deb http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt/ precise-pgdg main /etc/apt/sources.list' you'll be able to install postgis 2.1.2 with the right dependencies on Trusty. Out of curiosity, is there any reason to not use version 2.1.1 available in Ubuntu? JB. -- Jean-Baptiste Lallement irc: jibel -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Trusty Beta 2 Testing Report
Hi all, The testing report for Trusty Beta 2 has been published to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/ReleaseReports/TrustyBeta2TestingReport Thanks you to larsnooden, davmor2, maclin.jun, lbsolost, elfy, rcj, rohangarg, gilir, nio-wiklund, jr, lixiaoling, 295723212-v, stgraber, lyz, paulw2u, 1chb1n, adconrad, texadactyl, zequence, slickymaster, scottbomb, irihapeti, jimmy-sjolund, andrei-bugoiu, len-ovenwerks, knome, jiri-podvolecky, kaiserclaudius, james-page, pierre-equoy, kidsodateless, wkrekik, nskaggs, xdatap1, hirenngandhi, toz, johnnywholesome, walterorlin and every one who helped in testing this milestone! See you all in 3 weeks for the final release! JB. -- Jean-Baptiste Lallement irc: jibel -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Changes to wiki page Bugs/Importance
Hi Alberto, I noticed that you made important changes to the Bugs/Importance wiki page [1], important enough to not be done without discussion. If it has already been discussed somewhere, could you please point me to the discussion. One of the most important change you made was to rename the page from 'Bugs/Importance' to 'Bugs/Bug importance'. Furthermore there is no redirection from the previous version to this new page. The consequence is that there are now broken links on several other sections, this page is not found anymore by search engines with terms like 'ubuntu bugs importance' or even 'bug importance' and it adds no useful information since the word 'Bugs' was already on the URI. It also breaks consistency with other pages of the Bugs section named 'Bugs/Category' e.g Bugs/Status, ... You moved the header that contains the link to the bugsquad knowledge base from the top to bottom. This is important information that must be on top because it gives reference to triaging material for some one who is not familiar with it and landed directly on this page. You removed the introduction that explains what is importance and who can set it. The screenshot is a nice addition though. There are now 2 bullet points toward the end of the page, but who reads it entirely? Don't get me wrong, I really appreciate your contributions but I think this is an important change to a core page of the Bugsquad knowledge base that needs discussion beforehand. I'd suggest to revert this page to rev 33, (especially the renaming of the page) then discuss your changes. Cheers, [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Bug importance formerly https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance -- Jean-Baptiste irc: jibel -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Trusty image 10 (20131031.1) now available
On 11/04/2013 11:15 AM, Jani Monoses wrote: Hi, how hard would it be to provide merged changelog files between released images as opposed to the separate daily builds? Not hard, it is essentially a matter of spending time on this script which was was not supposed to survive 13.10 :) But since it is still alive I'll do the update, and try to move it to a more reliable place than my desktop. For regression testing it may help easily finding the changes that introduced a bug based only on users reporting the image number they were using. Jani On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Alan Pope alan.p...@canonical.com mailto:alan.p...@canonical.com wrote: Hi, Trusty image #10 is now available. The following changelogs detail the updates since the last promoted image #5 (20131024). http://people.canonical.com/~j-lallement/touch/changes/20131025.html http://people.canonical.com/~j-lallement/touch/changes/20131029.html http://people.canonical.com/~j-lallement/touch/changes/20131029.1.html http://people.canonical.com/~j-lallement/touch/changes/20131031.html http://people.canonical.com/~j-lallement/touch/changes/20131031.1.html Please update your device and test. Cheers, -- Alan Pope Engineering Manager Canonical - Product Strategy +44 (0) 7973 620 164 tel:%2B44%20%280%29%207973%20620%20164 alan.p...@canonical.com mailto:alan.p...@canonical.com http://ubuntu.com/ -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-ph...@lists.launchpad.net mailto:ubuntu-ph...@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Jean-Baptiste IRC: jibel -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
