Re: Request to reset src:mariadb-10.1 to previous known working state in Ubuntu archives
Hi Otto, On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 08:33:53PM +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > I might look into uploading mariadb-10.3 if I have energy to debug all > epoch fallout issues in the control file, but it seems unlikely it > would make into Ubuntu 18.04 since freeze and release is upon us. mariadb-10.1 is an unseeded universe package; certainly if there are no library ABI changes this should be straightforward to include for 18.04, and if there are library ABI changes I would still consider it. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Request to reset src:mariadb-10.1 to previous known working state in Ubuntu archives
ing against: > 6. Going backwards in version numbers. AIUI, Launchpad will not permit > this anyway and nor will Debian ftpmasters. > 7. Directly fixing mariadb-10.2 without reverting mariadb-10.1 first by > bumping it. Since Bionic is past feature freeze and mariadb-10.2 has > always been broken, I think it's prudent to get the archive into a > releaseable state first, and only then looking at bumping major > versions. IMHO (but this is the release team's decision and not mine), > we should consider 10.2 to have missed feature freeze since it has > always been broken. Making 10.2 or 10.3 work in the archive for Bionic > now should be breaking feature freeze so should follow the usual > exception process. In any case, re-publishing mariadb-10.1 as I suggest > should be comparatively trivial and will not impact any move to 10.2 or > 10.3 whether in this cycle or in the future. > Does this plan (steps 1 to 3 above) seem reasonable to everyone? +1 from me. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Policy: filing bugs against Ubuntu packages instead of upstream projects
Hi Michał, On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:33:00AM +0100, Michał Sawicz wrote: On 26.11.2013 02:44, Ursula Junque wrote: If upstreams don't oppose to that, bugs should only be filed against Ubuntu packages, discouraging the direct upstream reporting. Once we have an agreement, we need to document this to prevent all the confusion to happen again, and then discuss what to do with the previously reported bugs. Oliver (ogra) said there was an email some time ago to direct people to file bugs only against Ubuntu packages but no one seems to find it, feel free to point that out if you think that's relevant. I just tried to file a bug against Ubuntu (unity8)¹, unfortunately I can't set the status to 'Triaged', or decide the importance. So, well... I can't triage Ubuntu (unity8) bugs. AFAICT, we also don't get notified about new Ubuntu (unity8) bugs, even though I added a subscription for my team². Not exactly sure why that is, but the project has Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers³, which actually doesn't exist...⁴ All in all, if all of us need to get added to some global Ubuntu team to be able to triage Ubuntu (*) bugs for their projects, that's not ideal... Current state doesn't work for us either... Well, you say it's not ideal; but we are all working together toward a common goal of producing a coherent OS, and there are benefits to having consistent policies for bug tracking across the various components of that OS. I think the members of your team (and other upstream teams) should easily be able to meet the requirements for the bugsquad team, and participate in bug triage for your packages on an equal footing with the rest of the community. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: raring iso beta2 - incomplete language support
Hi Nick, On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 06:03:38PM -0400, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: Excellent, thanks Vasudevan. So open question to the release team -- should these two packages be on the iso? hyphen-en-us thunderbird-locale-en (I reckon for all default languages they are missing as well). I checked the filesystem manifest for the latest raring iso and indeed these are missing. And we prompt then upon login to install them if you do a non-network english install. My guess is for our supported languages we should include these packages. Thoughts? It's expected/intended that these packages are not included on the ISO. The first time the machine is connected to the network, you're offered the option to install them; but they're optional packages, and including them on the CD would mean a trade-off between never prompting to install extra packages for language support, and fitting more languages on the image. I think making the image useful to users of more languages when no network is available at all is worthwhile. BTW, when you say prompt upon login if you do a non-network install, you mean that you're prompted if you did a non-network install and then connected to the network post-install, correct? Obviously if you have no network, we shouldn't prompt you to install packages you'll be unable to download. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org On 04/18/2013 05:02 PM, Vasudevan Kottilil wrote: Hi Nicholas, This is the info that I have: Some translations or writing aids available for your chosen languages are not installed yet - Details hyphen-en-us thunderbird-locale-en contents for one of the preseed files from 1304 iso cat /mnt/preseed/cli.seed # Only install the standard system and language packs. taskseltasksel/firstmultiselect d-ipkgsel/language-pack-patternsstring # No language support packages. d-ipkgsel/install-language-supportboolean false Vasudevan On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Vasudevan Kottilil vasudeva...@gmail.com mailto:vasudeva...@gmail.com wrote: Yes - installed it with out internet access. After installation, ran apt-get update and still got it. Will try to see what all language packs got installed. On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Nicholas Skaggs nicholas.ska...@canonical.com mailto:nicholas.ska...@canonical.com wrote: Take a look at what it is wanting to install -- what packages? Odds are the following happened: You installed without internet access The language packs it wants to install for US English aren't on the cd Now, if you figure out what language packs didn't install, we can narrow if they are on the image or not. If they are, it's most certainly a bug. If they aren't we'll have to confer with the release team about whether or not they should be included. I hope that makes sense! Let us know! Nicholas On 04/15/2013 11:20 AM, Vasudevan Kottilil wrote: After installation, this window pops up. The language support for your selected language seems to be incomplete ... etc. Installation options were default - language - US English Not sure if this is expected behavior or not. -- Ubuntu-release mailing list ubuntu-rele...@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
