Re: Final Image Testing for Utopic!
Den 2014-10-27 14:50, Ian Bruntlett skrev: ... Also... quick question. I have tried googling for Kernel paramters but found nothing authoritative. Would you mind either telling me what the quiet and splash parameters do or point me in the direction of a relevant web page? Still perservering! BW, Ian Hi Ian, See these links about boot options alias kernel parameters https://help.ubuntu.com/community/BootOptions#Common_Kernel_Options http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt Best regards Nio -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Final Image Testing for Utopic!
Hi, Made some progress. linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.16.0-23-generic root=UUID=etc ro nomodeset quiet splash vga=768 You see some kernel messages. Then X starts up Then a kernel message about starting up NTP appears and a few messages after that, we have a big black screen. At this point I pressed CTRL+ALT+F1 and logged in as a text mode user. Now all I need to do is to find the appropriate package to install the Intel 810 graphics drivers from. I prefer to do a sudo apt-get install but have recently discovered the text mode package manager aptitude. TIA, Ian -- -- ACCU - Professionalism in programming - http://www.accu.org -- Free Software page - http://contactmorpeth.wikispaces.com/SoftwareToolkit -- My writing - https://sites.google.com/site/ianbruntlett/ -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Final Image Testing for Utopic!
Hi Walter, On 25 October 2014 23:02, Walter Lapchynski w...@ubuntu.com wrote: I think professionalism in programming would suggest creating a bug report. Indeed, that is the best place to have all this troubleshooting information exist. This way bug triagers, users, and developers can sort through it and try to make sense out of it. Point taken. However I want to avoid clogging up developer's time with bug reports that were either caused by the tester or tester's hardware. I've done all the testing I can and got nowhere. This bug, however, has got me stumped. Could you refer me to a particular page to report this bug? I have an Ubuntu One account and am subscribed to these e-mail mailing lists:- * ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com * lubuntu-us...@lists.ubuntu.com I can tell you as Lubuntu's Release Manager, we had no such bug come up during the cycle except the one I already mentioned that was fixed and that affected all flavors. OK. Please bear in mind that whilst I have some Linux experience I find the Ubuntu site difficult to navigate. Please make sure to subscribe the Lubuntu Packages Team, by the way. Thanks! Done that :) BW, Ian -- -- ACCU - Professionalism in programming - http://www.accu.org -- Free Software page - http://contactmorpeth.wikispaces.com/SoftwareToolkit -- My writing - https://sites.google.com/site/ianbruntlett/ -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Final Image Testing for Utopic!
Ian Bruntlett: However I want to avoid clogging up developer's time with bug reports that were either caused by the tester or tester's hardware. Working in new bugs is useless anyway, having plenty of confirmed ones. But reporting bugs brings the opportunity to the next user to confirm them. -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Final Image Testing for Utopic!
OK... to eliminate hardware failure being the problem, I dug out my Ubuntu 14.04LTS CD-R and reinstalled it on my Dell test system. When it comes to logging on, I do tend to get a white and black screen with some squiggles. This computer works fine with 14.04LTS and fails with 14.10. Just to test the system further I ran the Software Updater and it ran OK. Towards the end it was quite slow but the system's performance is fine. Looked in the dmesg text and that revealed my graphics is being supplied by an Intel 810 chipset. -- -- ACCU - Professionalism in programming - http://www.accu.org -- Free Software page - http://contactmorpeth.wikispaces.com/SoftwareToolkit -- My scribblings https://sites.google.com/site/ianbruntlett/. -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Final Image Testing for Utopic!
P.S. I have a few ideas up my sleeve to try and install this lubuntu image. Will take some time so will try it out tonight. HTH, Ian -- -- ACCU - Professionalism in programming - http://www.accu.org -- Free Software page - http://contactmorpeth.wikispaces.com/SoftwareToolkit -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Final Image Testing for Utopic!
Hi All, On 23 October 2014 10:15, Ian Bruntlett ian.bruntl...@gmail.com wrote: P.S. I have a few ideas up my sleeve to try and install this lubuntu image. Will take some time so will try it out tonight. Tonight, during the install, when the message Undefined video mode number : 314. Press ENTER to see video modes available appeared I pressed ENTER and chose video mode 0. Booting this system still results in a white screen with a black squiggle on it. I downloaded the official 14.10 alternate lubuntu 386 installer and will be trying it at the weekend. The isos I'm working with are: e4f3ad46fa269104b01aff422d17b079 utopic-alternate-i386-20141022.iso 49c072a9492201456b22200d66f697d5 lubuntu-14.10-alternate-i386.iso BW, Ian -- -- ACCU - Professionalism in programming - http://www.accu.org -- Free Software page - http://contactmorpeth.wikispaces.com/SoftwareToolkit -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Final Image Testing for Utopic!
Hi Phil, On 21 October 2014 23:27, Phill Whiteside phi...@phillw.net wrote: @ Ian, I see no notification on that bug of anyone rejecting the fix. Will you please ensure you have an up to date image. As this bug would also knock out ubuntu server, I would expect people to be squealing really loudly by now. The bug number is 1380774 and according to http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/defects is already fixed. BW, Ian -- -- ACCU - Professionalism in programming - http://www.accu.org -- Free Software page - http://contactmorpeth.wikispaces.com/SoftwareToolkit -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Final Image Testing for Utopic!
The aforementioned bugs should all be fixed and the release team has respun the images. Please update your images and test them again. Confirm the bugs are fixed and nothing else has regressed. If you've not yet submitted a result, please do so now. We need positive results as well! Thanks and happy testing! Nicholas On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Ian Bruntlett ian.bruntl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Phil, On 21 October 2014 23:27, Phill Whiteside phi...@phillw.net wrote: @ Ian, I see no notification on that bug of anyone rejecting the fix. Will you please ensure you have an up to date image. As this bug would also knock out ubuntu server, I would expect people to be squealing really loudly by now. The bug number is 1380774 and according to http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/defects is already fixed. BW, Ian -- -- ACCU - Professionalism in programming - http://www.accu.org -- Free Software page - http://contactmorpeth.wikispaces.com/SoftwareToolkit -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Final Image Testing for Utopic!
Thanks to everyone for the results, keep'em coming! If you haven't yet submitted test results, please do so. We currently have a few critical bugs affecting the images; http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1380774 http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325801 http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1362333 Nicholas On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:57 PM, chris hermansen clherman...@gmail.com wrote: Just to add some better news... but 1325801 offers a workaround, which made everything work with installation albeit at 1024 X 768. also bug 1295961 which deals with the non support in nouveau of the GTX750 card offers a ppa which gives a clean installation of the needed (proprietary) drivers. On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:41 PM, chris hermansen clherman...@gmail.com wrote: Nicholas and list, On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Nicholas Skaggs nicholas.ska...@canonical.com wrote: On 10/16/2014 03:03 PM, Colin Law wrote: On 16 October 2014 19:17, chris hermansen clherman...@gmail.com wrote: Nicholas, list; One problem I have run into that I'm not clear on how to report - it seems that my NVIDIA 750 is not correctly supported and I am put in a really low-resolution graphics mode. In fact, so low resolution that I can't read the bottom half of the screen settings, and of course that window can not be resized You can move a window on screen by holding down Alt and mouse dragging. Colin Chris, Colin is correct, so you should be able to slide any windows you need to into view. As to the bug, I would report it against the nouveau driver which is what would be used during the installation. I have a few questions that would be useful to answer in the bug report. Does this happen during a live session as well? After installation, does the desktop still boot into a low resolution? Thanks for testing! Thanks, Nicholas. As it was, I had to run live because of bug 1325801 which affected me as well. Live was the ultra-low resolution view, I'm guessing 640 X 480. Once installed, the system booted into a slightly higher view (didn't check but I bet it was 1024 X 768). The latest NVIDIA driver offered by the repositories does not support the 750. And sadly, I was unable to get the NVIDIA generic installation to work though it runs fine on my 14.04 installation. Sounds like a bunch of bug reports in all different directions... -- Chris Hermansen · clhermansen at gmail dot com C'est ma façon de parler. -- Chris Hermansen · clhermansen at gmail dot com C'est ma façon de parler. -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Final Image Testing for Utopic!
Nicholas, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1380774 is fix released, was done Friday 17th October. Regards, Phill. On 21 October 2014 16:08, Nicholas Skaggs nicholas.ska...@canonical.com wrote: Thanks to everyone for the results, keep'em coming! If you haven't yet submitted test results, please do so. We currently have a few critical bugs affecting the images; http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1380774 http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325801 http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1362333 Nicholas On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:57 PM, chris hermansen clherman...@gmail.com wrote: Just to add some better news... but 1325801 offers a workaround, which made everything work with installation albeit at 1024 X 768. also bug 1295961 which deals with the non support in nouveau of the GTX750 card offers a ppa which gives a clean installation of the needed (proprietary) drivers. On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:41 PM, chris hermansen clherman...@gmail.com wrote: Nicholas and list, On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Nicholas Skaggs nicholas.ska...@canonical.com wrote: On 10/16/2014 03:03 PM, Colin Law wrote: On 16 October 2014 19:17, chris hermansen clherman...@gmail.com wrote: Nicholas, list; One problem I have run into that I'm not clear on how to report - it seems that my NVIDIA 750 is not correctly supported and I am put in a really low-resolution graphics mode. In fact, so low resolution that I can't read the bottom half of the screen settings, and of course that window can not be resized You can move a window on screen by holding down Alt and mouse dragging. Colin Chris, Colin is correct, so you should be able to slide any windows you need to into view. As to the bug, I would report it against the nouveau driver which is what would be used during the installation. I have a few questions that would be useful to answer in the bug report. Does this happen during a live session as well? After installation, does the desktop still boot into a low resolution? Thanks for testing! Thanks, Nicholas. As it was, I had to run live because of bug 1325801 which affected me as well. Live was the ultra-low resolution view, I'm guessing 640 X 480. Once installed, the system booted into a slightly higher view (didn't check but I bet it was 1024 X 768). The latest NVIDIA driver offered by the repositories does not support the 750. And sadly, I was unable to get the NVIDIA generic installation to work though it runs fine on my 14.04 installation. Sounds like a bunch of bug reports in all different directions... -- Chris Hermansen · clhermansen at gmail dot com C'est ma façon de parler. -- Chris Hermansen · clhermansen at gmail dot com C'est ma façon de parler. -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Final Image Testing for Utopic!
When you find bugs that are already reported, that's good data for the bug. I would report the result on the isotracker and then provide a link to the pre-existing bug report. On the bug report, I would click the 'also affects me' button at the top of the page. This raises the bug heat and is the best way to say 'this affects me too'. If you believe you have valuable info to add, please do comment on the bug report. Just avoid adding the me too! type comments. This means if the only comments you can add to the bug are that your machine is also broke, even if you provide the machine details, you don't need to leave the comment. By clicking 'affects me' you've already sent this data point. On the other hand if you can provide more details about the bug, or the bug behaves uniquely for you, etc, please do comment. *Sometimes* this might mean you would leave a comment saying it affects brand X of hardware as well as what's listed in the bug, but only when the bug itself mentions these specific limitations. Bugsquaders, please feel free to correct if I mispoke on anything above :-) I trust this helps and makes sense. Thanks so much for testing! Nicholas On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Ian Bruntlett ian.bruntl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Nicholas, On 21 October 2014 16:19, Phill Whiteside phi...@phillw.net wrote: On 21 October 2014 16:08, Nicholas Skaggs nicholas.ska...@canonical.com wrote: Thanks to everyone for the results, keep'em coming! If you haven't yet submitted test results, please do so. We currently have a few critical bugs affecting the images; http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1380774 http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325801 http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1362333 I have tested 2 lubuntu images. The first one displayed a blank screen where a login screen should have been visible. The other one failed to install, the key error message from the installer being No installable kernel was found in the defined APT sources. The installer still installed the packages. On booting, as could be expected, there was no kernel and the system boots straight into memtest86+ Originally I didn't post anything because by the time I found them, they were already listed on the appropriate Ubuntu web pages. What would you prefer I do in future? Report only bugs that haven't been listed? Or report listed bugs with info about how a known bug affects my particular test system? BW Ian -- -- ACCU - Professionalism in programming - http://www.accu.org -- Free Software page - http://contactmorpeth.wikispaces.com/SoftwareToolkit -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Final Image Testing for Utopic!
Using an up to date image is useful. I repeat that this was fixed last Friday.. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1380774/comments/33 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1380774/comments/34 @ Ian, I see no notification on that bug of anyone rejecting the fix. Will you please ensure you have an up to date image. As this bug would also knock out ubuntu server, I would expect people to be squealing really loudly by now. @ Brian, As this is so critical, what else could we do? Regards, Phill. On 21 October 2014 19:49, Nicholas Skaggs nicholas.ska...@canonical.com wrote: When you find bugs that are already reported, that's good data for the bug. I would report the result on the isotracker and then provide a link to the pre-existing bug report. On the bug report, I would click the 'also affects me' button at the top of the page. This raises the bug heat and is the best way to say 'this affects me too'. If you believe you have valuable info to add, please do comment on the bug report. Just avoid adding the me too! type comments. This means if the only comments you can add to the bug are that your machine is also broke, even if you provide the machine details, you don't need to leave the comment. By clicking 'affects me' you've already sent this data point. On the other hand if you can provide more details about the bug, or the bug behaves uniquely for you, etc, please do comment. *Sometimes* this might mean you would leave a comment saying it affects brand X of hardware as well as what's listed in the bug, but only when the bug itself mentions these specific limitations. Bugsquaders, please feel free to correct if I mispoke on anything above :-) I trust this helps and makes sense. Thanks so much for testing! Nicholas On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Ian Bruntlett ian.bruntl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Nicholas, On 21 October 2014 16:19, Phill Whiteside phi...@phillw.net wrote: On 21 October 2014 16:08, Nicholas Skaggs nicholas.ska...@canonical.com wrote: Thanks to everyone for the results, keep'em coming! If you haven't yet submitted test results, please do so. We currently have a few critical bugs affecting the images; http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1380774 http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325801 http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1362333 I have tested 2 lubuntu images. The first one displayed a blank screen where a login screen should have been visible. The other one failed to install, the key error message from the installer being No installable kernel was found in the defined APT sources. The installer still installed the packages. On booting, as could be expected, there was no kernel and the system boots straight into memtest86+ Originally I didn't post anything because by the time I found them, they were already listed on the appropriate Ubuntu web pages. What would you prefer I do in future? Report only bugs that haven't been listed? Or report listed bugs with info about how a known bug affects my particular test system? BW Ian -- -- ACCU - Professionalism in programming - http://www.accu.org -- Free Software page - http://contactmorpeth.wikispaces.com/SoftwareToolkit -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Final Image Testing for Utopic!
Ian Bruntlett said: I have tested 2 lubuntu images. Which ones? At this point you should be checking the images here: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/325/builds Judging by your message, you were using the alternate version. You have come across two fixed bugs. The first one displayed a blank screen where a login screen should have been visible. The bug report that should be related to this one is here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1371651 This bug existed in the release of Beta2 (20140926), but was fixed in the daily image 20140929. The other one failed to install, the key error message from the installer being No installable kernel was found in the defined APT sources. The installer still installed the packages. On booting, as could be expected, there was no kernel and the system boots straight into memtest86+ The bug report that should be related to this one is here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1380774 Note this fix came with the 20141017.1 image version of the Final release. Originally I didn't post anything because by the time I found them, they were already listed on the appropriate Ubuntu web pages. What would you prefer I do in future? Report only bugs that haven't been listed? Or report listed bugs with info about how a known bug affects my particular test system? I would suggest searching for similar bug reports (you would have found them easily) and/or looking for what other people are reporting on the tracker for the relevant day. If you get these problems that no one else gets, it's pretty unlikely. However, the possibility exists of some sort of regression. I find it unlikely, but it's possible. If you are using the right image and have checked the md5 (use zsync, it does it for you), please get in touch ASAP. -- @wxl Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact Ubuntu Oregon LoCo Team Leader -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Final Image Testing for Utopic!
On 10/10/2014 11:54 AM, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: We're just about a week away from the first RC images for utopic hitting the image tracker. Please plan to help test the images as they appear. RC images should appear on the tracker by Oct 17th and no later than October 20th. Never tested an image before? Checkout the information on the wiki, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/QATracker and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/ISO/Walkthrough. You can sharpen your skills right now by testing a daily image. If you encounter any issues during testing please don't hestiate to ask for help. Don't forget, you can talk in realtime on IRC on freenode @ #ubuntu-quality. http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=ubuntu-quality A big thank you to all of you who have and will participate in making sure utopic is the best quality it can be. Happy Testing! Nicholas The images are here! http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/325/builds Please help test these images as they will become the final version of utopic for ubuntu and its flavors! Nicholas -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Final Image Testing for Utopic!
Nicholas, list; One problem I have run into that I'm not clear on how to report - it seems that my NVIDIA 750 is not correctly supported and I am put in a really low-resolution graphics mode. In fact, so low resolution that I can't read the bottom half of the screen settings, and of course that window can not be resized... also there are no other drivers detected, though I know that NVIDIA has some closed source drivers that work fine with this card. How should I go about reporting this kind of thing? I am continuing the install blind to see if, once installed, I can get decent screen resolution without resorting to packages outside the distro. Thanks in advance On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Nicholas Skaggs nicholas.ska...@canonical.com wrote: On 10/10/2014 11:54 AM, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: We're just about a week away from the first RC images for utopic hitting the image tracker. Please plan to help test the images as they appear. RC images should appear on the tracker by Oct 17th and no later than October 20th. Never tested an image before? Checkout the information on the wiki, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/QATracker and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ Testing/ISO/Walkthrough. You can sharpen your skills right now by testing a daily image. If you encounter any issues during testing please don't hestiate to ask for help. Don't forget, you can talk in realtime on IRC on freenode @ #ubuntu-quality. http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=ubuntu-quality A big thank you to all of you who have and will participate in making sure utopic is the best quality it can be. Happy Testing! Nicholas The images are here! http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/325/builds Please help test these images as they will become the final version of utopic for ubuntu and its flavors! Nicholas -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality -- Chris Hermansen · clhermansen at gmail dot com C'est ma façon de parler. -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Final Image Testing for Utopic!
On 16 October 2014 19:17, chris hermansen clherman...@gmail.com wrote: Nicholas, list; One problem I have run into that I'm not clear on how to report - it seems that my NVIDIA 750 is not correctly supported and I am put in a really low-resolution graphics mode. In fact, so low resolution that I can't read the bottom half of the screen settings, and of course that window can not be resized You can move a window on screen by holding down Alt and mouse dragging. Colin -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Final Image Testing for Utopic!
On 10/16/2014 03:03 PM, Colin Law wrote: On 16 October 2014 19:17, chris hermansen clherman...@gmail.com wrote: Nicholas, list; One problem I have run into that I'm not clear on how to report - it seems that my NVIDIA 750 is not correctly supported and I am put in a really low-resolution graphics mode. In fact, so low resolution that I can't read the bottom half of the screen settings, and of course that window can not be resized You can move a window on screen by holding down Alt and mouse dragging. Colin Chris, Colin is correct, so you should be able to slide any windows you need to into view. As to the bug, I would report it against the nouveau driver which is what would be used during the installation. I have a few questions that would be useful to answer in the bug report. Does this happen during a live session as well? After installation, does the desktop still boot into a low resolution? Thanks for testing! Nicholas -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Re: Final Image Testing for Utopic!
Colin and list, On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Colin Law clan...@gmail.com wrote: On 16 October 2014 19:17, chris hermansen clherman...@gmail.com wrote: Nicholas, list; One problem I have run into that I'm not clear on how to report - it seems that my NVIDIA 750 is not correctly supported and I am put in a really low-resolution graphics mode. In fact, so low resolution that I can't read the bottom half of the screen settings, and of course that window can not be resized You can move a window on screen by holding down Alt and mouse dragging. Argh, good point, I forgot about that. Thanks! -- Chris Hermansen · clhermansen at gmail dot com C'est ma façon de parler. -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
