Re: Default libjpeg-dev in oneiric
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 11:27 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote: > On 07/29/2011 10:47 AM, Micah Gersten wrote: > > On 07/29/2011 02:39 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 06:13:49PM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 17:54 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote: > CCing ubuntu-devel so people are aware of the issue > Due to the accidental autosync, we pulled in a libjpeg8-dev that > provides libjpeg-dev. Should we revert that one change (not provide > libjpeg-dev in libjpeg8) or should we try to do the transition? There > are a number of incomplete transitions ATM (libnotify, libssl, libav, > boost1.4.6, and a few more with ~10 packages each). > Attached are a list of rdepends affected. > >>> ...ouch. > >>> Given we'll be putting out the A3 release next week, and I don't believe > >>> this update and transition is essential, my preference would be to > >>> revert it for now, and then after A3's out, assess if if makes sense > >>> to pull it in and manage the transition, or wait until P-series for this > >>> one. > >>> Given all the stuff about to land for A3 and Feature Freeze almost upon > >>> us, it seems a bit risky to add this in, esp. with folks going on > >>> vacation right now. > >>> What do others think? > >> I agree, best to back this out. Micah, will you upload the necessary > >> change? (Sooner better than later, so we don't drift too much while > >> libjpeg8-dev is the default?) > >> > > Actually, libjpeg8-dev isn't the default ATM. Anything with libjpeg-dev > > as a build depend will FTBFS since 2 packages provide the same virtual > > libjpeg-dev package. I'll prepare an upload to fix, but I need it > > sponsored still. > > Thanks, > > Micah > > > This has been uploaded and should be available after the next publisher run. Thanks Micah! :) Kate -- Ubuntu-release mailing list Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
Re: Default libjpeg-dev in oneiric
On 07/29/2011 10:47 AM, Micah Gersten wrote: > On 07/29/2011 02:39 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 06:13:49PM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote: >>> On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 17:54 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote: CCing ubuntu-devel so people are aware of the issue Due to the accidental autosync, we pulled in a libjpeg8-dev that provides libjpeg-dev. Should we revert that one change (not provide libjpeg-dev in libjpeg8) or should we try to do the transition? There are a number of incomplete transitions ATM (libnotify, libssl, libav, boost1.4.6, and a few more with ~10 packages each). Attached are a list of rdepends affected. >>> ...ouch. >>> Given we'll be putting out the A3 release next week, and I don't believe >>> this update and transition is essential, my preference would be to >>> revert it for now, and then after A3's out, assess if if makes sense >>> to pull it in and manage the transition, or wait until P-series for this >>> one. >>> Given all the stuff about to land for A3 and Feature Freeze almost upon >>> us, it seems a bit risky to add this in, esp. with folks going on >>> vacation right now. >>> What do others think? >> I agree, best to back this out. Micah, will you upload the necessary >> change? (Sooner better than later, so we don't drift too much while >> libjpeg8-dev is the default?) >> > Actually, libjpeg8-dev isn't the default ATM. Anything with libjpeg-dev > as a build depend will FTBFS since 2 packages provide the same virtual > libjpeg-dev package. I'll prepare an upload to fix, but I need it > sponsored still. > Thanks, > Micah > This has been uploaded and should be available after the next publisher run. Thanks, Micah -- Ubuntu-release mailing list Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
Re: Default libjpeg-dev in oneiric
On 07/29/2011 02:39 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 06:13:49PM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote: >> On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 17:54 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote: >>> CCing ubuntu-devel so people are aware of the issue >>> Due to the accidental autosync, we pulled in a libjpeg8-dev that >>> provides libjpeg-dev. Should we revert that one change (not provide >>> libjpeg-dev in libjpeg8) or should we try to do the transition? There >>> are a number of incomplete transitions ATM (libnotify, libssl, libav, >>> boost1.4.6, and a few more with ~10 packages each). >>> Attached are a list of rdepends affected. >> ...ouch. >> Given we'll be putting out the A3 release next week, and I don't believe >> this update and transition is essential, my preference would be to >> revert it for now, and then after A3's out, assess if if makes sense >> to pull it in and manage the transition, or wait until P-series for this >> one. >> Given all the stuff about to land for A3 and Feature Freeze almost upon >> us, it seems a bit risky to add this in, esp. with folks going on >> vacation right now. >> What do others think? > I agree, best to back this out. Micah, will you upload the necessary > change? (Sooner better than later, so we don't drift too much while > libjpeg8-dev is the default?) > Actually, libjpeg8-dev isn't the default ATM. Anything with libjpeg-dev as a build depend will FTBFS since 2 packages provide the same virtual libjpeg-dev package. I'll prepare an upload to fix, but I need it sponsored still. Thanks, Micah -- Ubuntu-release mailing list Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
New component-mismatches for source universe -> main
The following universe packages have new reverse dependencies in main or got seeded. They need to get a MainInclusionReport and be promoted, or the reverse dependencies in main need to be dropped: [Reverse-Depends: Rescued from swig2.0, swig, swig-examples] Please see http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.txt for the full report. Please contact Martin Pitt for problems with this notification. -- Ubuntu-release mailing list Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
Re: Default libjpeg-dev in oneiric
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 06:13:49PM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote: > On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 17:54 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote: > > CCing ubuntu-devel so people are aware of the issue > > Due to the accidental autosync, we pulled in a libjpeg8-dev that > > provides libjpeg-dev. Should we revert that one change (not provide > > libjpeg-dev in libjpeg8) or should we try to do the transition? There > > are a number of incomplete transitions ATM (libnotify, libssl, libav, > > boost1.4.6, and a few more with ~10 packages each). > > Attached are a list of rdepends affected. > ...ouch. > Given we'll be putting out the A3 release next week, and I don't believe > this update and transition is essential, my preference would be to > revert it for now, and then after A3's out, assess if if makes sense > to pull it in and manage the transition, or wait until P-series for this > one. > Given all the stuff about to land for A3 and Feature Freeze almost upon > us, it seems a bit risky to add this in, esp. with folks going on > vacation right now. > What do others think? I agree, best to back this out. Micah, will you upload the necessary change? (Sooner better than later, so we don't drift too much while libjpeg8-dev is the default?) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- Ubuntu-release mailing list Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
