Re: Alpha 1 freeze in effect

2013-12-18 Thread Kate Stewart
Thanks Steve for the correction.

Sorry Jonathan  Scott - typo on my part.

Kate


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Steve Langasek
steve.langa...@ubuntu.comwrote:

 On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:31:35PM -0600, Kate Stewart wrote:
  Hi all,

  Alpha 1 freeze[1] is now in effect, and the following flavors are
  participating in putting out the first Alpha release for 14.04:
   - Xubuntu
   - Edubuntu
   - Lubuntu
   - Ubuntu GNOME
   - UbuntuKylin

 According to
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2013-December/002671.html
 (and http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/309/builds), Kubuntu is
 participating in Alpha 1, Lubuntu is not.  The milestone freeze in
 proposed-migration reflects this.

 --
 Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
 Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
 Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
 slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org

 --
 Ubuntu-release mailing list
 Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


falling a bit behind for final Beta??

2013-09-18 Thread Kate Stewart
Hiya Adam,
Couple of questions:

1)  why hasn't there been a post to ubuntu-devel-announce to let the
developers know we'll be freezing for final beta shortly?  [1]

2)  I didn't see a resolution on the mail list about whether we'd be doing
the beta freeze tomorrow [2] or next monday. Right now it calls for
tomorrow per the process page and the schedule,  is this going to hold?
 What about UIF?

Thanks, Kate

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BetaProcess   9/26 -10 = 9/16
[2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/ReleaseSchedule
-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: Beta Process - reworked - DRAFT available for discussion.

2013-09-16 Thread Kate Stewart
Hi Release Team,
I didn't see any feedback on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BetaProcessReworked
so I've assumed its close enough, and replaced BetaProcess with it.It
can be reverted if folks disagree. I saw Colin made some edits to both
earlier today, and there's just no point in
keeping two copies around.

Hi Adam,
   Since I see you're down for this cycle for the checklist tracking [1],
do all the tasks that were scheduled to be done today (Release minus 10
days) still make sense from Canonical's perspective?   There were some I'd
question.   If they're no longer applicable, can you please delete them so
we can clean up the list to just what is actually needed?

Hi Pete,
Are you still going to be putting together the release notes for this
Beta [1]?   Or with your new role, is this a gap?

Thanks, Kate

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/ReleaseTaskSignup


On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Kate Stewart k...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Dear Release Team members and Flavor Release Managers,

 After going through the optional beta 1 last week, its pretty clear
 that some tasks are not really applicable for the opt-in,  others only make
 sense when /testing is being used for ubuntu and ubuntu-server, etc.

 I've taken a first pass at splitting up the tasks to reflect if they
 should be done in the opt-in beta or the final beta.   There are '?' where
 its worth discussing what should be done.   The document is a first attempt
 and framework - there's probably a lot more to discuss than those I've
 noted with a '?'.  ;-)

 Please see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BetaProcessReworked
 the original: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BetaProcess
 has not been touched and is available for comparison purposes.

 Lets discuss this on the list and see if we can get the '?' resolved,  and
 then when we're happy replace the BetaProcess with BetaProcessReworked
 content.

 Thanks, Kate



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


13.10 (Saucy Salamander) Beta 1 Released!

2013-09-05 Thread Kate Stewart
Welcome to the Saucy Salamander Beta 1 release, which will in
timebecome the 13.10 release.This alpha features images for Edubuntu,
Kubuntu, Lubuntu, Ubuntu GNOME,Ubuntu Kylin, Ubuntu Studio and
Xubuntu.Pre-releases of Saucy Salamander are *not* encouraged for
anyone needinga stable system or anyone who is not comfortable running
intooccasional, even frequent breakage.  They are, however,
recommended forUbuntu developers and those who want to help in
testing, reporting, andfixing bugs as we work towards getting this
release ready.At the end of the 12.10 development cycle, the Ubuntu
desktop and serverflavours decided that they would reduce the number
of milestone imagesgoing forward and the focus would concentrate on
daily quality andfortnightly testing rounds known as cadence testing.
Based on thatchange, the Ubuntu products themselves will not have a
Beta 1 release.Their first milestone release will be the  beta release
on the 26th ofSeptember 2013. Other Ubuntu flavours have the option to
release usingthe usual milestone schedule.  Further schedule details
can be found:https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/ReleaseSchedule.The
Beta images are known to be reasonably free of showstopper CD buildor
installer bugs, while representing a very recent snapshot of Saucy.You
can download them here:Edubuntu:  Edubuntu is a flavor of Ubuntu
designed as a free education oriented  operating system for kids of
all ages.  The Beta-1 images can be downloaded at:
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/edubuntu/releases/saucy/beta-1/  More
information on the Edubuntu Beta-1 cand be found here:
http://www.edubuntu.org/news/13.10-beta1Kubuntu:  Kubuntu is the KDE
based flavour of Ubuntu. It uses the Plasma desktop  and includes a
wide selection of tools from the KDE project.  The Beta-1 images can
be downloaded at:
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/releases/saucy/beta-1/  More
information on Kubuntu Beta-1 can be found here:
https://wiki.kubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Beta1/KubuntuLubuntu:
Lubuntu is a flavor of Ubuntu that targets to be lighter, less
resource hungry and more energy-efficient by using lightweight
applications and LXDE, The Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment,   as
its default GUI.  The Beta-1 images can be downloaded at:
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/saucy/beta-1/  More
information on Lubuntu Beta-1 can be found here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Beta1/LubuntuUbuntu GNOME:
Ubuntu GNOME is a flavor of Ubuntu featuring the GNOME desktop
environment.  The Beta-1 images can be downloaded at:
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-gnome/releases/saucy/beta-1/  More
information on Ubuntu-GNOME Beta-1 can be found here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Beta1/UbuntuGNOME

UbuntuKylin:  UbuntuKylin is a flavor of Ubuntu that is more suitable
for Chinese  users.  The Beta-1 images can be downloaded at:
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntukylin/releases/saucy/beta-1/  More
information on UbuntuKylin Beta-1 can be found here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuKylin/1310-beta-1-ReleaseNote Ubuntu
Studio:  Ubuntu Studio is a flavor of Ubuntu that provides a full
range of  multimedia content creation applications for each key
workflows:  audio, graphics, video, photography and publishing.  The
Beta-1 images can be downloaded at:
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/releases/saucy/beta-1/  More
information on Ubuntu Studio Beta-1 can be found here:
http://ubuntustudio.org/2013/09/ubuntu-studio-13-10-saucy-salamander-beta-1-released/
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Beta1/UbuntuStudio  Xubuntu:
  Xubuntu is a flavor of Ubuntu that comes with Xfce, which is a
stable,  light and configurable desktop environment.  The Beta-1
images can be downloaded at:
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/releases/saucy/beta-1/  More
information on Xubuntu Beta-1 can be found here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Beta1/XubuntuRegular daily
images for Ubuntu can be found at:   http://cdimage.ubuntu.comIf
you're interested in following the changes as we further developSaucy,
we suggest that you subscribe to the ubuntu-devel-announce list.This
is a low-traffic list (a few posts a week) carrying announcementsof
approved specifications, policy changes, alpha releases and
otherinteresting events.
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-announceA big
thank you to the developers and testers for their efforts to pull
together this Beta release!Kate Stewart and Iain Lane, on behalf of
the Ubuntu Release Team.
-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


13.10 (Saucy Salamander) Beta 1 Released!

2013-09-05 Thread Kate Stewart
Welcome to the Saucy Salamander Beta 1 release, which will in
timebecome the 13.10 release.This alpha features images for Edubuntu,
Kubuntu, Lubuntu, Ubuntu GNOME,Ubuntu Kylin, Ubuntu Studio and
Xubuntu.Pre-releases of Saucy Salamander are *not* encouraged for
anyone needinga stable system or anyone who is not comfortable running
intooccasional, even frequent breakage.  They are, however,
recommended forUbuntu developers and those who want to help in
testing, reporting, andfixing bugs as we work towards getting this
release ready.At the end of the 12.10 development cycle, the Ubuntu
desktop and serverflavours decided that they would reduce the number
of milestone imagesgoing forward and the focus would concentrate on
daily quality andfortnightly testing rounds known as cadence testing.
Based on thatchange, the Ubuntu products themselves will not have a
Beta 1 release.Their first milestone release will be the  beta release
on the 26th ofSeptember 2013. Other Ubuntu flavours have the option to
release usingthe usual milestone schedule.  Further schedule details
can be found:https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/ReleaseSchedule.The
Beta images are known to be reasonably free of showstopper CD buildor
installer bugs, while representing a very recent snapshot of Saucy.You
can download them here:Edubuntu:  Edubuntu is a flavor of Ubuntu
designed as a free education oriented  operating system for kids of
all ages.  The Beta-1 images can be downloaded at:
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/edubuntu/releases/saucy/beta-1/  More
information on the Edubuntu Beta-1 cand be found here:
http://www.edubuntu.org/news/13.10-beta1Kubuntu:  Kubuntu is the KDE
based flavour of Ubuntu. It uses the Plasma desktop  and includes a
wide selection of tools from the KDE project.  The Beta-1 images can
be downloaded at:
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/releases/saucy/beta-1/  More
information on Kubuntu Beta-1 can be found here:
https://wiki.kubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Beta1/KubuntuLubuntu:
Lubuntu is a flavor of Ubuntu that targets to be lighter, less
resource hungry and more energy-efficient by using lightweight
applications and LXDE, The Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment,   as
its default GUI.  The Beta-1 images can be downloaded at:
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/saucy/beta-1/  More
information on Lubuntu Beta-1 can be found here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Beta1/LubuntuUbuntu GNOME:
Ubuntu GNOME is a flavor of Ubuntu featuring the GNOME desktop
environment.  The Beta-1 images can be downloaded at:
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-gnome/releases/saucy/beta-1/  More
information on Ubuntu-GNOME Beta-1 can be found here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Beta1/UbuntuGNOME

UbuntuKylin:  UbuntuKylin is a flavor of Ubuntu that is more suitable
for Chinese  users.  The Beta-1 images can be downloaded at:
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntukylin/releases/saucy/beta-1/  More
information on UbuntuKylin Beta-1 can be found here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuKylin/1310-beta-1-ReleaseNote Ubuntu
Studio:  Ubuntu Studio is a flavor of Ubuntu that provides a full
range of  multimedia content creation applications for each key
workflows:  audio, graphics, video, photography and publishing.  The
Beta-1 images can be downloaded at:
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/releases/saucy/beta-1/  More
information on Ubuntu Studio Beta-1 can be found here:
http://ubuntustudio.org/2013/09/ubuntu-studio-13-10-saucy-salamander-beta-1-released/
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Beta1/UbuntuStudio  Xubuntu:
  Xubuntu is a flavor of Ubuntu that comes with Xfce, which is a
stable,  light and configurable desktop environment.  The Beta-1
images can be downloaded at:
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/releases/saucy/beta-1/  More
information on Xubuntu Beta-1 can be found here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Beta1/XubuntuRegular daily
images for Ubuntu can be found at:   http://cdimage.ubuntu.comIf
you're interested in following the changes as we further developSaucy,
we suggest that you subscribe to the ubuntu-devel-announce list.This
is a low-traffic list (a few posts a week) carrying announcementsof
approved specifications, policy changes, alpha releases and
otherinteresting events.
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-announceA big
thank you to the developers and testers for their efforts to pull
together this Beta release!Kate Stewart and Iain Lane, on behalf of
the Ubuntu Release Team.
-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


13.10 (Saucy Salamander) Beta 1 Released!

2013-09-05 Thread Kate Stewart
Welcome to Saucy Salamander Beta 1 release, which will in time
become the 13.10 release.

This alpha features images for Edubuntu, Kubuntu, Lubuntu,
Ubuntu GNOME, UbuntuKylin, Ubuntu Studio and Xubuntu.

Pre-releases of Saucy Salamander are *not* encouraged for anyone needing
a stable system or anyone who is not comfortable running into
occasional, even frequent breakage.  They are, however, recommended for
Ubuntu developers and those who want to help in testing, reporting, and
fixing bugs as we work towards getting this release ready.

At the end of the 12.10 development cycle, the Ubuntu desktop and server
flavours decided that they would reduce the number of milestone images
going forward and the focus would concentrate on daily quality and
fortnightly testing rounds known as cadence testing.  Based on that
change, the Ubuntu products themselves will not have a Beta 1 release.
Their first milestone release will be the  beta release on the 26th of
September 2013. Other Ubuntu flavours have the option to release using
the usual milestone schedule.  Further schedule details can be found:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/ReleaseSchedule.

The Beta images are known to be reasonably free of showstopper CD build
or installer bugs, while representing a very recent snapshot of Saucy.
You can download them here:

Edubuntu:
  Edubuntu is a flavor of Ubuntu designed as a free education oriented
  operating system for kids of all ages.

  The Beta-1 images can be downloaded at:
  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/edubuntu/releases/saucy/beta-1/

  More information on the Edubuntu Beta-1 cand be found here:
  http://www.edubuntu.org/news/13.10-beta1

Kubuntu:
  Kubuntu is the KDE based flavour of Ubuntu. It uses the Plasma desktop
  and includes a wide selection of tools from the KDE project.

  The Beta-1 images can be downloaded at:
  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/releases/saucy/beta-1/

  More information on Kubuntu Beta-1 can be found here:
  https://wiki.kubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Beta1/Kubuntu

Lubuntu:
  Lubuntu is a flavor of Ubuntu that targets to be lighter, less
  resource hungry and more energy-efficient by using lightweight
  applications and LXDE, The Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment,
  as its default GUI.

  The Beta-1 images can be downloaded at:
  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/saucy/beta-1/

  More information on Lubuntu Beta-1 can be found here:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Beta1/Lubuntu

Ubuntu GNOME:
  Ubuntu GNOME is a flavor of Ubuntu featuring the GNOME desktop
  environment.

  The Beta-1 images can be downloaded at:
  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-gnome/releases/saucy/beta-1/

  More information on Ubuntu-GNOME Beta-1 can be found here:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Beta1/UbuntuGNOME

UbuntuKylin:
  UbuntuKylin is a flavor of Ubuntu that is more suitable for Chinese
  users.

  The Beta-1 images can be downloaded at:
  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntukylin/releases/saucy/beta-1/

  More information on UbuntuKylin Beta-1 can be found here:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuKylin/1310-beta-1-ReleaseNote

Ubuntu Studio:
  Ubuntu Studio is a flavor of Ubuntu that provides a full range of
  multimedia content creation applications for each key workflows:
  audio, graphics, video, photography and publishing.

  The Beta-1 images can be downloaded at:
  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/releases/saucy/beta-1/

  More information on Ubuntu Studio Beta-1 can be found here:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Beta1/UbuntuStudio

Xubuntu:
  Xubuntu is a flavor of Ubuntu that comes with Xfce, which is a stable,
  light and configurable desktop environment.

  The Beta-1 images can be downloaded at:
  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/releases/saucy/beta-1/

  More information on Xubuntu Beta-1 can be found here:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Beta1/Xubuntu

Regular daily images for Ubuntu can be found at:
  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com


If you're interested in following the changes as we further develop
Saucy, we suggest that you subscribe to the ubuntu-devel-announce list.
This is a low-traffic list (a few posts a week) carrying announcements
of approved specifications, policy changes, alpha releases and other
interesting events.

  http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-announce

A big thank you to the developers and testers for their efforts to
pull together this Beta release!

Kate Stewart and Iain Lane, on behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team.
-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Saucy Beta 1 release notes - templates ready for team input

2013-09-02 Thread Kate Stewart
For the teams participating in Beta 1 this week,   the link to each team's
release notes page is now available from:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Beta1.

Bugs common to all flavors will be tracked in:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Beta1/CommonInfrastructure and have
been set up to automatically import into the templates.

Please check that the links are accurate and add your content before
Thursday  :-).

Thanks, Kate
-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: Saucy Beta 1 participation

2013-08-29 Thread Kate Stewart
Based on who responded,  looks like the opt-ins for Beta 1 are:

Edubuntu - contact: Stéphane Graber ( or Jonathan Carter)
Kubuntu - contact: Jonathan Riddell   (or Scott Kitterman )
Lubuntu - contact: Phill Whiteside
UbuntuKyliin - contact: Jack Yu
Ubuntu GNOME - contact: Tim Lunn
Ubuntu Studio - contact: Howard Chan ( or Kaj Ailomaa )
Xubuntu - contact: Pasi Lallinaho

Did I get the contacts right?   Miss anyone?

Thanks, Kate


On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Jonathan Riddell j...@jriddell.org wrote:


 Yes please for Kubuntu

 Jonathan

 --
 Ubuntu-release mailing list
 Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release

-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


13.10 (Saucy Salamander) Alpha 1 Released!

2013-06-27 Thread Kate Stewart
Perhaps I'm too saucy or provoking?
 -- Benjamin Franklin

The first Alpha of the Saucy Salamander (to become 13.10) has now been
released!

This alpha features images for Kubuntu, Lubuntu, Ubuntu GNOME, and
UbuntuKylin.

Pre-releases of Saucy Salamander are *not* encouraged for anyone
needing a stable system or anyone who is not comfortable running
into occasional, even frequent breakage.  They are, however,
recommended for Ubuntu developers and those who want to help in
testing, reporting and fixing bugs as we work towards getting
this release ready.

Alpha 1 includes a number of software updates that are ready for wider
testing. This is quite an early set of images, so you should expect some
bugs.

While these Alpha 1 images have been tested and work, except as noted
in the release notes, Ubuntu developers are continuing to improve Saucy
Salamander.  In particular, once newer daily images are available, system
installation bugs identified in the Alpha 1 installer should be verified
against the current daily image before being reported in Launchpad.
Using an obsolete image to re-report bugs that have already been fixed
wastes your time and the time of developers who are busy trying to make
13.10 the best Ubuntu release yet.  Always ensure your system is up to
date before reporting bugs.

There have been some adjustments to the release schedule for 13.10
since the last vUDS, so for the latest plans, please check:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/ReleaseSchedule

Kubuntu:
  Kubuntu is the KDE based flavour of Ubuntu. It uses the Plasma desktop
  and includes a wide selection of tools from the KDE project.

  The Alpha-1 images can be downloaded at:
  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/releases/saucy/alpha-1/

  More information on Kubuntu Alpha-1 can be found here:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Alpha1/Kubuntu

Lubuntu:
  Lubuntu is a flavor of Ubuntu that targets to be lighter, less
  resource hungry and more energy-efficient by using lightweight
  applications and LXDE, The Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment,
  as its default GUI.

  The Alpha-1 images can be downloaded at:
  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/saucy/alpha-1/

  More information on Lubuntu Alpha-1 can be found here:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Alpha1/Lubuntu

Ubuntu GNOME:
  Ubuntu GNOME is an flavor of Ubuntu featuring the
  GNOME desktop environment.

  The Alpha-1 images can be downloaded at:
  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-gnome/releases/saucy/alpha-1/

  More information on Ubuntu-GNOME Alpha-1 can be found here:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Alpha1/UbuntuGNOME

UbuntuKylin:
  UbuntuKylin is a flavor of Ubuntu that is more suitable for
  Chinese users.

  The Alpha-1 images can be downloaded at:
  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntukylin/releases/saucy/alpha-1/

  More information on UbuntuKylin Alpha-1 can be found here:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuKylin/1310-alpha-1-ReleaseNote


Regular daily images for Ubuntu can be found at:
  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com

If you're interested in following the changes as we further develop
Saucy, we suggest that you subscribe to the ubuntu-devel-announce list.
This is a low-traffic list (a few posts a week) carrying announcements
of approved specifications, policy changes, alpha releases and other
interesting events.
  http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-announce


A big thank you to the developers and testers for their efforts to
pull together this initial Alpha release!

Kate Stewart, on behalf of the Ubuntu release team.
-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Alpha 1 participation?

2013-06-23 Thread Kate Stewart
Hiya,
Trying to figure out who will be participating in Alpha 1 this week.
 So far I've seen:

Kubuntu - yes
Ubuntukylin - yes
Lubuntu - ?
Xubuntu - ?
Ubuntu Gnome - ?
Ubuntu Cloud - ?
Ubuntu Studio - ?
Ubuntu - no
Ubuntu Server - no
Edubuntu - no
Mythbuntu - no


Does the above reflect everyone's understanding?

Pasi, Juilien, Jermy, Daviey, Kaj,
For the flavors marked as ?, are your teams participating in Alpha 1?

I've set up a page for tracking this:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Alpha1

Thanks,
Kate, on behalf of the Ubuntu Release team.
-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Raring Alpha 2 - soft freeze to let participating flavors release.

2013-02-11 Thread Kate Stewart
Hi,
   We're in soft freeze now, and the participating flavors (Kubuntu and
Edubuntu? ) have been taken out of the daily image respins now by Steve,
who's spinning up the bits for this release.

   If a flavor needs a respin for an Alpha 2 image, please let Steve know
in #ubuntu-release on FreeNode.

Thanks, Kate
-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Which flavors participating in Raring Alpha 2?

2013-02-08 Thread Kate Stewart
Dear flavor leads,
From the email traffic last month,   its clear that Kubuntu and
Edubuntu are participating in Alpha 2 next week.   Xubuntu isn't.

Do Lubuntu and Ubuntu Studio want to be added to the list?

Thanks,
Kate
-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty Narwhal) end-of-life reached on October 28, 2012

2012-10-28 Thread Kate Stewart
This note is just to confirm that the support period for Ubuntu 11.04
(Natty Narwhal) formally ends on October 28, 2012 and Ubuntu Security
Notices no longer includes information or updated packages for 
Ubuntu 11.04.  

The supported upgrade path from Ubuntu 11.04 is via Ubuntu 11.10
(Oneiric Ocelot).  Instructions and caveats for the upgrade may be 
found at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/OneiricUpgrades.  Note 
that upgrades to version 11.10 and beyond are only supported in 
multiple steps, via an upgrade first to 11.10, then to 12.04. 
Both Ubuntu 11.10 and Ubuntu 12.04 continue to be actively 
supported with security updates and select high-impact bug fixes. 
All announcements of official security updates for Ubuntu releases 
are sent to the ubuntu-security-announce mailing list, information 
about which may be found at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-security-announce. 

Since its launch in October 2004 Ubuntu has become one of the most
highly regarded Linux distributions with millions of users in homes,
schools, businesses and governments around the world. Ubuntu is Open
Source software, costs nothing to download, and users are free to
customize or alter their software in order to meet their needs. 

on behalf of the Release Team,
Kate Stewart




-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Ubuntu 12.10 (Quantal Quetzal) released!

2012-10-19 Thread Kate Stewart
of ways you can participate at:

   http://www.ubuntu.com/community/get-involved


About Ubuntu


Ubuntu is a full-featured Linux distribution for desktops, laptops,
netbooks and servers, with a fast and easy installation and regular
releases. A tightly-integrated selection of excellent applications
is included, and an incredible variety of add-on software is just a
few clicks away.

Professional services including support are available from Canonical
and hundreds of other companies around the world.  For more information
about support, visit:

   http://www.ubuntu.com/support


More Information


You can learn more about Ubuntu and about this release on our
website listed below:

   http://www.ubuntu.com

To sign up for future Ubuntu announcements, please subscribe to
Ubuntu's very low volume announcement list at:

   http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-announce



On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team,
Kate Stewart



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


[Fwd: 12.10]

2012-10-19 Thread Kate Stewart
Passing on the compliments to the best release team around...  :) 
Pretty much echo's the reply emails (other than the vacation notices)
that have been coming in.

Thank you for all your efforts pulling 12.10 and getting it out the
door.

Kate
---BeginMessage---
Hi,

I left it a couple of hours and asked on the ubuntu-forum team area if they
were seeing any issues..

(02:28:15) phillw: (02:19:35) phillw: are there any repeated requests for
help on issues that are making a trend (theme)? As in.. are you seeing
repeated instances of the same issue with 12.10 anywhere?
(02:28:15) phillw: (02:21:41) krytarik: phillw, nope, I myself didn't
notice any yet, neither in DE, nor at a quick glance into ABS.
(02:37:45) phillw: (02:36:38) krytarik: phillw, yeah, it really seems like
a pretty smooth release again this time. :)

I'd call that a success...

I'll leave it for Nicholas and Kate to pass onto the release  / dev teams.

Regards,

Phill.

-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
---End Message---
-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


12.10 (Quantal Quetzal) Final Freeze - now in effect.

2012-10-09 Thread Kate Stewart
Dear Developers, 

Final Freeze [1] is now in effect.

If you know of a bug currently targeted for Quantal that is not going to
get fixed in the time remaining,  please decide if its a candidate for
an SRU, and if so, milestone it as quantal-updates.

Also,  if its clear the bug is not going to get fixed in Quantal, and is
not a good target for an SRU,  please nominate it for a 'R' series task,
and then mark the bug as won't fix in quantal.

This will help the release team focus on those last key bug fixes we'll
be trying to get included.

Thanks!!

on behalf of the release team,
Kate

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FinalFreeze




-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: [Desktop] Release Meeting 2012-10-05

2012-10-05 Thread Kate Stewart
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 10:49 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:

 === What's about to land that might impact the other teams and release 
 as a whole? ===
 
   * There is still a Libreoffice update with appmenu fixes to land

What is the outlook for the medium font fix?  Can it be included in this
update?

   * Some webapp fixes should still land as well
Which specific bug numbers do you recommend be accepted?


 === Dependencies on other teams to make deliverables, blocking items, 
 release wide concerns? ===
 
   * Seems the recent nvidia update broke unity launcher reveal (lp: 
 #1057000)

Is there a work around?

Kate



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Starting off R blueprints and cleaning up Q ones.

2012-10-02 Thread Kate Stewart
Dear Developers,

After tracking down and resolving several blueprints that weren't 
labeled properly so they'd get into the list[1] for R series and UDS
planning,  it seemed like a refresher of the conventions to use
might be appropriate.  ;)

When registering a blueprint,  most efficient way to get it created
and sorted into the right place is to Register a Blueprint from
r-series page [1].  Some conventions to follow:
   * Name: of blueprint should be of the form track-r-topic name
   * Propose for sprint: Ubuntu Developer Summit-R
   * Click on propose for series goal

   There are also some draft conventions[2] for the content to put in
the blueprint that will permit automation.  There will be a separate
email to discuss those further.  Would like to come to closure on this
at UDS-R on standard format for all of us to use, so we can start making
effective use of bots to help with the housekeeping tasks...

   And on that note ;),  could approvers and assignees of blueprints,
please take a pass through the current set of blueprints [3], and make
sure they all are up to date by 10/4 1200 UTC.   We'll be using the
information in them to generate the first pass of the 12.10 Release
Notes, and only picking up information from those marked Beta
Available or Complete.   Specifically we'll be looking for text in
the Release Note: section of the whiteboard.  If a line item is
clearly now not going to make it,  please mark it as postponed.

 We'll be using [5] to summarize the feedback and results of working
with the prototype this release,  possibly spinning out a separate
blueprint to continue the evolution,  based on feedback added.   As you
work through the blueprints, and other issues emerge, feel free to add
them to the Whiteboard on [5].

Thanks for your help with this,
Kate

[1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/r-series
[2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BlueprintSpec
[3] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/quantal
[4] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-q-release-notes
[5]https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-r-prior-release-feedback



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


reminder, we will be having a release meeting today.

2012-09-28 Thread Kate Stewart
Want to make sure we're all in sync on a couple of issues,  and that the
critical bugs are being addressed.


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Ubuntu 12.10 (Quantal Quetzal) Beta 2 Released!

2012-09-27 Thread Kate Stewart
The Ubuntu team is pleased to announce the final beta release of Ubuntu
12.10 Desktop, Server, Cloud, and Core products.

Codenamed Quantal Quetzal, 12.10 continues Ubuntu's proud tradition 
of integrating the latest and greatest open source technologies into a
high-quality, easy-to-use Linux distribution.  The team has been hard 
at work through this cycle, introducing new features and fixing bugs.

With Ubuntu 12.10, Kubuntu, Edubuntu, Lubuntu, Xubuntu and 
Ubuntu Studio also reached Beta 2 status today.   These images will 
continue to have daily updates for the remainder of the release.


Ubuntu Changes
--

Some of the new features available since Beta 1 are:

 * Quantal Beta-2 includes the 3.5.0-15.23 Ubuntu Linux kernel which 
   is based on the v3.5.4 upstream Linux kernel. 

 * Unity has been updated to version 6.6 which contains the new 
   default web application in the launcher, a new shopping lens,
   improvements to the dash and multiple bug fixes.

 * GNOME has been updated to 3.5.92 for most components (some to 3.6.0)

 * Accessibility is turned on by default. 

Please see http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/ for details.


Ubuntu Server and Cloud Images
--

 * Cloud Images now have Quick Start buttons to enable Quick Start like 
   function for Amazon AWS images.  They also no longer have a five 
   second boot time out.

 * Ubuntu now has native packaging for Amazon AWS RDS (rdscli), 
   Identity Management(iamcli), Elastic LoadBalancing (elbcli), 
   ElastiCache (elasticache), and CloudWatch (moncli).

Please see http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/ for details.


Kubuntu
---

 * The addition of encrypted and LVM partitioning options in the 
   Kubuntu desktop images removes the need for alternate images, 
   which will no longer be shipped for 12.10.

 * Calligra's Krita adds a world class painting application while
   Kexi provides a full featured database application.

Please see https://wiki.kubuntu.org/QuantalQuetzal/Beta2/Kubuntu for
details.


Edubuntu


 * The Gnome Fallback session (also known as the Ubuntu Classic) will 
   now be made default when LTSP is selected, since Unity 2D is no 
   longer available in the archives.

 * Changes from the Ubuntu defaults for certain packages.

For more details on what has changed in Edubuntu 12.10, please refer to
http://www.edubuntu.org .


Xubuntu
---

New features in Xubuntu Beta 2 include:

  * Updated artwork, including new wallpaper, documentation looks and 
updates to LightDM, Greybird and Ubiquity slideshow.

  * New versions of Catfish and Parole 

For more details on what has changed in Xubuntu 12.10, please refer to
http://xubuntu.org/news/quantalbeta2/ .



Lubuntu
---

Lubuntu has seen many bug fixes applied since Beta 1.  There
are some known issues with PowerPC ports that are being worked through
so they aren't part of Beta 2.

For more information about the changes in Lubuntu 12.10, 
please go to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu .


Ubuntu Studio
-

Ubuntu Studio has had many bug fixes applied since Beta 1. 

Please see http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/quantal/beta2 for more details
on the above products.


About Ubuntu


Ubuntu is a full-featured Linux distribution for clients, servers and
clouds, with a fast and easy installation and regular releases.  A
tightly-integrated selection of excellent applications is included, and
an incredible variety of add-on software is just a few clicks away.

Professional technical support is available from Canonical Limited and
hundreds of other companies around the world.  For more information
about support, visit http://www.ubuntu.com/support .

If you would like to help shape Ubuntu, take a look at the list of ways
you can participate at:  http://www.ubuntu.com/community/participate .

Your comments, bug reports, patches and suggestions really help us to
improve this and future releases of Ubuntu.   Instructions can be 
found at: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs .


To Get Ubuntu 12.10 Beta 2
--

To upgrade to Ubuntu 12.10 Beta 2 from Ubuntu 12.04, follow 
these instructions:

  https://help.ubuntu.com/community/QuantalUpgrades

Or, download Ubuntu 12.10 Beta 2 images from a location near you: 

  http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/download (Ubuntu and Ubuntu Server) . 

In addition they can be found at the following links:

  http://releases.ubuntu.com/12.10/ (Ubuntu, Ubuntu Server)
  http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/releases/12.10/beta-2/
  (Ubuntu Cloud Images)
  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/12.10/beta-2/
  (Ubuntu community supported images, source)
  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-core/releases/12.10/beta-2/
  (Ubuntu Core)
  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/netboot/12.10/ (Ubuntu Netboot)
  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/releases/12.10/beta-2/ 
  (Kubuntu)
  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/edubuntu/releases/12.10/beta-2/ 
  (Edubuntu)
  

Quantal Archive to remain in pre-release freeze until 12.10 Release.

2012-09-27 Thread Kate Stewart
Dear Developers,
We've just released Beta 2 now,  and I wanted to say thank you for
all your excellent work on the release to date!  :)   We're now entering
the final phase of polishing the release and removing those last nasty
bugs. 

We will be keeping the Quantal archive in pre-release freeze state
from now until release, due to the high rate of churn on some projects,
and the need to keep the dailies building between now and final freeze.
Please continue to upload your fixes to quantal (or quantal-proposed, if
there is likely to be archive skew issues from the build),  and they
will be reviewed by the release team.   

   Only bug fixes should be uploaded now, and features should NOT be
mixed in with the bug fixes.   If you have a compelling reason why a
FFE/UIFE needs to be granted, please make sure that code is in its own
upload, and discuss it with the release team on #ubuntu-release in
advance. 

Some of the key dates coming up [1] are:

* October 4 - Kernel Freeze[2],  Desktop Infrastructure Freeze[3]
* October 9 - Translation Deadline[4],  Seeded Images Final Freeze [5]
* October 11 - Release Candidate [6], and Release Note Content Freeze[7]
* October 16 - Unseeded Universe Final Freeze [5]
* October 18 - 12.10 Release

   As you can see,  there not that much time left between now and Final
Freeze, so all fixes to Critical/High bugs are most welcome in this next
upcoming week.  

  Thank you again for all your excellent work over this release cycle,
and your help on feeding our Quantal Quetzal those last important bug
fixes.  :)

Kate Stewart,
on behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team.

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/ReleaseSchedule
[2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelFreeze
[3] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopInfrastructureFreeze
[4] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TranslationDeadline
[5] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FinalFreeze
[6] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReleaseCandidate
[7] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReleaseNotesFreeze





-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Quantal Beta Freeze now in effect.

2012-09-20 Thread Kate Stewart
Dear Developers,
   Beta Freeze[1] is now in effect (Thursday, September 20).
All uploads to the archive will now have to be approved manually 
by the release team, prior to inclusion.

   Please use the rls-q-incoming tag on any bugs found if 
its urgent to get fixed, so it comes to the attention of 
the appropriate development team as soon as possible.

   Also, this is now the time to review your blueprints,
and for those blueprints with features ready, please mark them
beta available or complete as appropriate.  This will
aid in generation of better release notes.

   If you have information that should be added to the 
techical overview for beta 2,  the draft document is now
available for input. [2] 

Thank you for your cooperation,  

Kate,
on behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team.


[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BetaFreeze
[2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/TechnicalOverview



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: [Ubuntu One] Release Meeting 2012-09-21

2012-09-20 Thread Kate Stewart
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 16:55 -0500, Joshua Hoover wrote:
 === What was done engineering wise? ===
 
  * Sync indicator is ready to go (see dependencies for more info)
  * Porting SSO client port to Python 3 continues but did not make it in Q
  * Bug fixes
 
 === What's about to land that might impact the other teams and release
 as a whole? ===
 
 === Summary of bugs working on by team (reasonably reliable) ===
 
  * Bug:1050923 - ubuntuone-client-data: Icons not getting installed
  * Bug:1042343 - ubuntuone-client: [FFE] [UIFE] Ubuntu One integration
 with Q sync indicator

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntuone-installer/+bug/856551
has been asked about in the past, and is a common problem on
errors.ubuntu.com - Can this be prioritized to be fixed ASAP?

 
 === Dependencies on other teams to make deliverables, blocking items,
 release wide concerns? ===
 
 We held off doing our own sync indicator in Q because we knew there were
 plans to do one for 12.10. Since that indicator was late, our
 integration with the indicator was also late. We have the two following
 outstanding FFEs that we'd still like considered for inclusion in Q:
 
 * Bug:1042343 - ubuntuone-client: [FFE] [UIFE] Ubuntu One integration
 with Q sync indicator

This feature was raised last week, and is in.

 * Bug:1053482 - indicator-sync: [FFe] [UIFe] Install indicator-sync by
 default

This feature was only raised to the release team's attention yesterday
(day of beta freeze).  This is way to late to be requesting default
installation changes.

 
 Without this feature in Q, Ubuntu One will be worse on Ubuntu than it
 will be on other platforms. An indicator is a very popular request from
 Ubuntu One users. The non-official indicator [1] Roman Yepishev built
 for Precise is popular amongst a fair number of Ubuntu One users.
 
 [1]
 http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/04/ubuntu-one-indicator-applet-adds-new-features
 




-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty Narwhal) reaches end-of-life on October 28, 2012

2012-09-16 Thread Kate Stewart
Ubuntu announced its 11.04 (Natty Narwhal) release almost 18 months
ago, on April 28, 2011.  As with the earlier releases,
Ubuntu committed to ongoing security and critical fixes for a period 
of 18 months. The support period is now nearing its end and Ubuntu 11.04
will reach end of life on Sunday, October 28.  At that time, Ubuntu
Security Notices will no longer include information or updated packages
for Ubuntu 11.04.

The supported upgrade path from Ubuntu 11.04 is via Ubuntu 11.10.
Instructions and caveats for the upgrade may be found at
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/OneiricUpgrades.  Ubuntu 11.10
continues to be actively supported with security updates and
select high-impact bug fixes. All announcements of official security
updates for Ubuntu releases are sent to the ubuntu-security-announce
mailing list, information about which may be found at
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-security-announce.

Since its launch in October 2004 Ubuntu has become one of the most
highly regarded Linux distributions with millions of users in homes,
schools, businesses and governments around the world. Ubuntu is Open
Source software, costs nothing to download, and users are free to
customise or alter their software in order to meet their needs.

Kate Stewart
Ubuntu Release Manager



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Default Languages on Ubuntu iso for 12.10?

2012-09-12 Thread Kate Stewart
Looking at the current daily images,
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/

Now that feature freeze is passed, we may end up having some space to
add some additional language packs back in, since we've made the
decision to no longer restricted to the CD size.

Is this the list that's historically been used to decide which ones 
to carry?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_languages_by_number_of_native_speakers

or was other criteria involved?  (am thinking of seb's comment at UDS
for instance ;) )

Kate



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Reminder: deadlines approaching for 12.10 translations

2012-09-10 Thread Kate Stewart
Dear Translators,
   Just a reminder that the translation deadlines for 12.10 release [1]
are approaching.

Sept 20th is the deadline for the Documentation String Freeze[2].

October 9th is the deadline for the Translations: 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TranslationDeadline

Thanks on behalf of the release team,
Kate

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/ReleaseSchedule
[2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DocumentationStringFreeze



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: [Unity] Release meeting 2012-09-07

2012-09-07 Thread Kate Stewart
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 14:21 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
 == What was done engineering wise? ==
 
 * quantal
- Fixes related to broken keybindings GSettings migration
 
 * precise
- More geis rename work for unity, unity-2d and nux
- More testing and preparations for Unity SRU-2 (planned release ASAP)
 
 == What's about to land that might impact the other teams and release as 
 a whole? ==
 
   * Outstanding items from PS as per earlier mail from Didier:-
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2012-September/001880.html

Could you please provide a summary of bug numbers that are tracking all
of the outstanding FFE's so some of the other teams are aware of what's
landing and when.   We're seriously overdue now on these, and some may
not make it, so careful tracking is going to be needed.

 
 == Summary of bugs working on by team (reasonably reliable) ==
 
 * compiz
- LP: #1040455:  Setting the UnMinimize animation is ignored (default 
 animation still used)
- LP: #1045191: compiz crashed with SIGABRT in assert from 
 boost::shared_ptrCompRect::operator
- LP: #1045652:  UnMinimize should be spelled Unminimize
- LP: #1045235:  Compiz crashed with SIGFPE in addQuads() 
 [plugins/opengl/src/paint.cpp:839]
- LP: #980663: Compiz won't start if unredirect fullscreen windows 
 is enabled
- LP: #1041066: Unredirect Fullscreen Windows sometimes fails to 
 unredirect fullscreen windows at all
- LP: #1041047: Unredirect Fullscreen Windows stay on top 
 (unredirected) even when they're not on top any more (or the output is 
 transformed)
- LP: #1046199: Changing a key to org.compiz.integrated schema 
 doesn't impact the current profile
- LP: #1046190: Migration to gsettings doesn't migrate compiz/unity 
 configurable keys to g-c-c and those keys doesn't work
- LP: #1040081: [regression] Week 34: Ctrl+Alt+T shortcut (open 
 terminal) fails to work

 * unity
- LP: #955561: Launcher - Add possibility to cancel Launcher icon 
 drag and drop by pressing
- LP: #1044723: If a new application is opened while dragging an 
 icon, unity hangs
- LP: #1010335: unityshell's Background Color (background_color) 
 setting is ignored on startup
- LP: #975350: Dash ignores custom background color setting
- LP: #924586: custom background color breaks display of launcher 
 icons if #00 is used
- LP: #1044709: unity-6.4.0 from quantal-proposed crashed with 
 SIGSEGV on omap4
- LP: #1043947: Dash preview stuck on spinner on first time
- LP: #1045187: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in 
 unity::dash::previews::CoverArt::OnFrameTimeout()
- LP: #1044823: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in 
 unity::dash::previews::CoverArt::SetNoImageAvailable()

Is there an ETA when we can get a fix for:
LP: #927168 compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in memmove() from
drisw_update_tex_buffer() from dri_set_tex_buffer2() from
drisw_bind_tex_image() from __glXBindTexImageEXT() from
TfpTexture::enable() from enableFragmentOperationsAndDrawGeometry()

Its showing up pretty critical on the release team radar and not on your
list.
http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-q-incoming-bug-tasks.html

Could you look at the high/critical DX bugs on the above list, and let
me know when they are going to be resolved?

 == Dependencies on other teams, blocking items ==
 
 *
 -- 
 Alan Pope
 Engineering Manager
 
 Canonical - Product Strategy
 +44 (0) 7973 620 164
 alan.p...@canonical.com
 http://ubuntu.com/
 



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: [Security] Release meeting 2012-09-07

2012-09-07 Thread Kate Stewart
Hi Marc,

On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 13:01 -0400, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
 Here is the status for the security team:
 
 [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/ReleaseStatus/Quantal
 [LINK] 
 http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-precise/group/topic-precise-security-essential.html

hmm... while this is a much nicer graph,  you probably meant
http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-quantal/group/topic-quantal-security-essential.html
  ;)
It looks like the apparmour work items aren't going to make it at this
point or haven't been updated in a bit,  could you please update the
status of them to POSTPONED if that is appropriate.

 [LINK] http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-quantal/canonical-security.html
 
 === What was done engineering wise? ===
 
  * Regular reactive security work in Quantal and stable releases
  * Ongoing AppArmor work
  * Ongoing large number of MIR security audits
  * Packages containing AppArmor profiles were updated to take advantage
of new Apport filtering capability
 
 === What's about to land that might impact the other teams? ===
 
  * Nothing
 
 === Release Notes ===
 
 === Summary of bugs working on by team (reasonably reliable) ===
 
  * LP: #1045986 - Ubuntu AppArmor policy is too lenient with shell scripts
- fixes are being worked on
 
 === Dependencies on other teams, blocking items? ===
 
  * None.
 
 === Issues? ===
 
  * None.
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Marc.
 
 
 



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: [Unity] Release meeting 2012-09-07

2012-09-07 Thread Kate Stewart
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 18:09 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
 On 07/09/12 16:56, Kate Stewart wrote:

  Is there an ETA when we can get a fix for:
  LP: #927168 compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in memmove() from
  drisw_update_tex_buffer() from dri_set_tex_buffer2() from
  drisw_bind_tex_image() from __glXBindTexImageEXT() from
  TfpTexture::enable() from enableFragmentOperationsAndDrawGeometry()
 
  Its showing up pretty critical on the release team radar and not on your
  list.
  http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-q-incoming-bug-tasks.html
 
  Could you look at the high/critical DX bugs on the above list, and let
  me know when they are going to be resolved?
 
 
 We've spun up two maintenance squads to take care of outstanding 
 priority bugs in Quantal over and above the existing developers. Their 
 first set of tasks is your hit-list above. I'll update you next week 
 with progress.

Thanks!   

There's also 
http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-q-tracking-bug-tasks.html
That needs a good triage/scrub.   If a bug is not going to be fixed,
please mark it as such so we can get this list down to a reasonable
level.

If you could break the status of the bugs down to:

fix by beta1 freeze,   must fix by final freeze,  and SRU ok.
That would help.  :) Easiest way to have it show up automatically is
just to assign the  ubuntu milestone to each bug that's on the list.
That way folks can look at it,  and ask questions if there are
dependencies. 

Thanks, Kate



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Ubuntu 12.10 (Quantal Quetzal) Beta 1 Released.

2012-09-06 Thread Kate Stewart
The Ubuntu team is pleased to announce the first beta release of Ubuntu
12.10 Desktop, Server, Cloud, and Core products.

Codenamed Quantal Quetzal, 12.10 continues Ubuntu's proud tradition 
of integrating the latest and greatest open source technologies into a
high-quality, easy-to-use Linux distribution.  The team has been hard 
at work through this cycle, introducing new features and fixing bugs.

For the client, this release now has a consolidated Ubuntu image.  There 
is no longer a traditional CD sized image, DVD or alternate image, but 
rather a single 800MB Ubuntu image that can be used from USB or DVD.  
This change does not affect Ubuntu Server, which remains a traditional CD 
sized image.  

With Ubuntu 12.10, Kubuntu, Edubuntu, Lubuntu, and Ubuntu Studio 
also reached Beta 1 status today.   These images, along with Xubuntu will 
continue to have daily updates for the remainder of the release.


Ubuntu Changes
--

Some of the new features now available are:

 * The consolidated client images now support the logical volume 
   manager (LVM) as well as full disk encryption.

 * Update Manager has been renamed Software Updater and now checks for 
   updates when launched.

 * A new X.org stack has been introduced which includes xserver 
   1.13 candidate versions, mesa 9.0, and updated X libs and drivers. 

 * Unity has been updated to version 6.4 including support for dash
   previews and coverflow view.  Now that compiz with GLES support has
   landed, unity-3d works again on the pandaboard.

 * The Ubuntu desktop has begun migrating from Python 2 to Python 3.
   Most Python applications included in the desktop is now using Python 3,
   and most Python modules that are included by default are available for
   both Python 2 and Python 3.

Please see http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/ for details.


Ubuntu Server and Cloud Images
--

Some of the new features in the 12.10 beta images are:

 * ARM hard float (armhf) cloud images are now available.

 * OpenStack folsom testing packages are available.  
   Openstack instance architecture testing support has been 
   added, as has a heterogenous scheduler for ARM.

 * Apache Tomcat 7 is now the default supported version.

 * Ceph has updated to 0.48.1 (upstream argonaut stable release), 
   and includes RADOS Gateway (S3 and Swift Compatible), as well 
   as performance improvements.

 * Floodlight (Openflow Network Controller) and 
   mininet (Network Simulation) packages are now available.


Kubuntu
---

Kubuntu 12.10 now comes on a 1GB image for a USB drive or DVD.  
In addition other significant changes include:

 * KDE's plasma and applications have been updated to version 4.9.
 * Telepathy-KDE is now the default chat program offering easier 
   setup for modern networks like Facebook and GTalk.

 * Calligra is now the default office and graphics suite adding top 
   class painting and database applications.

 * The release of Rekonq 1 gives Kubuntu the stable web browser it 
   deserves.

 * New login manager LightDM adds a guest session feature for 
   letting your friends use your computer quickly.

 * Digikam 2.8 adds better photo handling.
 
 * OwnCloud 4 gives many web applications in your own remote or 
   local cloud

Please see https://wiki.kubuntu.org/QuantalQuetzal/Beta1/Kubuntu for details.


Edubuntu


In Edubuntu 12.10, a new package called 'edubuntu-netboot' is introduced. This
package now provides the functionality previously provided by ltsp-live and
will also be used for casper-netboot.

In addition, Tomboy has been re-introduced and Gnote removed.

For more details on what has changed in Edubuntu 12.10, please refer to
http://www.edubuntu.org .


Lubuntu
---

Lubuntu 12.10 has had a significant update of the visual identity, including
new icon themes, wallpaper, and better integration with the applications.
Other notable highlights include:

 * A new version of the session manager is available for testing. 

 * A new version of pcmanfm (file manager), including at lot of bug fixes,
   external thumbnailer support, multiple screen support.

 * catfish, a searching utility, have been added to the default installation.

For more information about the changes in Lubuntu 12.10, 
please go to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu .


Ubuntu Studio
-

Ubuntu Studio 12.10 Beta 1 ships with:

 * A new MIDI router and MIDI tools menu have been added. 

 * Task Manager has been switched to System Monitor for better memory use 
display.

 * Nautilus is now the default file manager. 


Please see http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/quantal/beta1 for more details
on the above products.


About Ubuntu


Ubuntu is a full-featured Linux distribution for clients, servers and
clouds, with a fast and easy installation and regular releases.  A
tightly-integrated selection of excellent applications is included, and
an incredible variety of add-on software is just a few clicks away.


Re: Release Process concerns (QA) and suggestions

2012-09-01 Thread Kate Stewart
Hi Gema,

Thanks for starting this thread off. :)

On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 11:38 +0100, Gema Gomez wrote:
 On 30/08/12 19:53, Stéphane Graber wrote:
  The release team is in charge of releasing a pre-defined set of 
  images, for a given list of media at a given date. That's how 
  things are.
  
  When we unfortunately hit a bug at the last minute, like happened 
  last week, the release team needs to check how critical it's. If 
  it's considered as a show-stopper, like was the case here, the
  only action to take is to fix it as soon as possible, re-test and
  then release.
  
  If we know it's technically impossible to get it re-tested in
  time, then we need to release a day later, but that's a very last
  resort as releasing on a Friday brings its own set of problems.
 
 Which kind of problems do you face when releasing on Friday? I think
 it'd be good for us to know the consequences as well.

The problem with releasing on Friday is that we don't have as good
coverage available to react to problems if they occur.  This is standard
policy for stable release updates as well as releases, and has become so
as a result lessons learned the hard way.   Exceptions do occur, but
they are very special cases, and contingency/monitoring plans need to be
figured out in advance.  

 
  In the case of 12.04.1, we noticed on release day that an image 
  didn't actually fit on its target media and apparently no tester 
  bothered to actually burn it to a standard CD...
 
 You could use du next time right after the image is built to satisfy
 yourself that the size is good, it could be a standard check that you
 guys do. 

Certain mandatory manual tests can only be run if a CD is burned,
specifically the AMD64+MAC based systems don't work with USB.   

 We have added some static validation tests to jenkins and are
 in the process of publishing them. 
 
The information was already published on
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/precise/daily-live/current/
(and related pages).  Its standard practice that an oversize indicator
in bold red is published on the page, when an image is over a
predetermined size as specified by the development teams.

It was a failure of both the QA and release teams that no one looked at
the page before Thursday.  Release team had been looking at them pretty
heavily the prior week, and thought we had all the issues solved.  Based
on discussions with Stéphane there are now plans to be adding an
indicator to the ISO tracker to make oversize issues more visible in the
future, as that is where some folks are now focusing, rather than the
original publishing pages.  

 I don't think we need to burn a CD
 to know if the image is going to fit or not. But if you want us to
 validate things manually, adding a test case to the current set in the
 iso tracker will help track that someone has bothered. Unfortunately I
 don't feel confident enough yet with the admin mode of the iso tracker
 to change anything, so your expertise there would be appreciated.

There is the implication that a CD is burned in some of the test cases
already, so I'm not sure that another test case need to be added, but
rather an existing one be split to make it explicit a CD or when
appropriate a DVD be burned as part of the test. 

If you have specific questions on admin'ing the iso tracker,  please
feel free to join us in #ubuntu-iso-tracker.   There are multiple folk
available (me, Jean-Baptiste, Nick), that can help as well.

 Anyway, looking forward rather than backwards, for Quantal the size is
 800MB so, what media do you suggest we test on for size next week?
 
 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-q-one-iso-for-q
 
For Desktop, please test on both USB and DVD.  For Ubuntu Server,
please test on both USB and CD.  We want to make sure both paths work
since they are likely to be common based on what hardware folks have
access to, and we'll be manufacturing CD's for Server, and DVD's for
desktop, so making sure there are no significant problems is important.
 
  We found an obvious way of fixing it (removing a langpack) within 
  just a couple of hours, got the change reviewed, tested, the image 
  rebuilt, the content checked and then fully re-tested by 3 testers 
  in less than 3 hours. Leaving us a good 10-12h before we actually 
  released the set.
 
 In my opinion, it is not possible for 3 people to do 10 installs + 3
 upgrades each to a good level of details in less than 3 hours. Yes,
 you can rush through things or split the test cases between the three
 of you, or consider some tests done because one test case is sort of a
 subset of another, and do some risk based testing, but the level of
 risk we are accepting is not clear nor understood by all the parties.

Its a case of testing smart, which we should all be aiming for. I had
good confidence after Stéphane, Jean-Baptiste, and Nick had exercised
the tests, after discussing their methodology with them.  We understood
the scope of the changes and possible 

Re: Release Process concerns (QA) and suggestions

2012-09-01 Thread Kate Stewart

Hi Gema,

Thanks for starting this thread off. :)

On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 11:38 +0100, Gema Gomez wrote:
 On 30/08/12 19:53, Stéphane Graber wrote:
  The release team is in charge of releasing a pre-defined set of 
  images, for a given list of media at a given date. That's how 
  things are.
  
  When we unfortunately hit a bug at the last minute, like happened 
  last week, the release team needs to check how critical it's. If 
  it's considered as a show-stopper, like was the case here, the
  only action to take is to fix it as soon as possible, re-test and
  then release.
  
  If we know it's technically impossible to get it re-tested in
  time, then we need to release a day later, but that's a very last
  resort as releasing on a Friday brings its own set of problems.
 
 Which kind of problems do you face when releasing on Friday? I think
 it'd be good for us to know the consequences as well.

The problem with releasing on Friday is that we don't have as good
coverage available to react to problems if they occur.  This is standard
policy for stable release updates as well as releases, and has become so
as a result lessons learned the hard way.   Exceptions do occur, but
they are very special cases, and contingency/monitoring plans need to be
figured out in advance.  

 
  In the case of 12.04.1, we noticed on release day that an image 
  didn't actually fit on its target media and apparently no tester 
  bothered to actually burn it to a standard CD...
 
 You could use du next time right after the image is built to satisfy
 yourself that the size is good, it could be a standard check that you
 guys do. 

Certain mandatory manual tests can only be run if a CD is burned,
specifically the AMD64+MAC based systems don't work with USB.   

 We have added some static validation tests to jenkins and are
 in the process of publishing them. 
 
The information was already published on
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/precise/daily-live/current/
(and related pages).  Its standard practice that an oversize indicator
in bold red is published on the page, when an image is over a
predetermined size as specified by the development teams.

It was a failure of both the QA and release teams that no one looked at
the page before Thursday.  Release team had been looking at them pretty
heavily the prior week, and thought we had all the issues solved.  Based
on discussions with Stéphane there are now plans to be adding an
indicator to the ISO tracker to make oversize issues more visible in the
future, as that is where some folks are now focusing, rather than the
original publishing pages.  

 I don't think we need to burn a CD
 to know if the image is going to fit or not. But if you want us to
 validate things manually, adding a test case to the current set in the
 iso tracker will help track that someone has bothered. Unfortunately I
 don't feel confident enough yet with the admin mode of the iso tracker
 to change anything, so your expertise there would be appreciated.

There is the implication that a CD is burned in some of the test cases
already, so I'm not sure that another test case need to be added, but
rather an existing one be split to make it explicit a CD or when
appropriate a DVD be burned as part of the test. 

If you have specific questions on admin'ing the iso tracker,  please
feel free to join us in #ubuntu-iso-tracker.   There are multiple folk
available (me, Jean-Baptiste, Nick), that can help as well.

 Anyway, looking forward rather than backwards, for Quantal the size is
 800MB so, what media do you suggest we test on for size next week?
 
 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-q-one-iso-for-q
 
For Desktop, please test on both USB and DVD.  For Ubuntu Server,
please test on both USB and CD.  We want to make sure both paths work
since they are likely to be common based on what hardware folks have
access to, and we'll be manufacturing CD's for Server, and DVD's for
desktop, so making sure there are no significant problems is important.
 
  We found an obvious way of fixing it (removing a langpack) within 
  just a couple of hours, got the change reviewed, tested, the image 
  rebuilt, the content checked and then fully re-tested by 3 testers 
  in less than 3 hours. Leaving us a good 10-12h before we actually 
  released the set.
 
 In my opinion, it is not possible for 3 people to do 10 installs + 3
 upgrades each to a good level of details in less than 3 hours. Yes,
 you can rush through things or split the test cases between the three
 of you, or consider some tests done because one test case is sort of a
 subset of another, and do some risk based testing, but the level of
 risk we are accepting is not clear nor understood by all the parties.

Its a case of testing smart, which we should all be aiming for. I had
good confidence after Stéphane, Jean-Baptiste, and Nick had exercised
the tests, after discussing their methodology with them.  We understood
the scope of the changes and possible 

Ubuntu 12.04.1 (Precise Pangolin) LTS released!

2012-08-23 Thread Kate Stewart
  The most important rule is to formulate, clearly and precisely, 
   the goal to be reached, and then to retain it unswervingly in 
   mind throughout all the stages of the execution, which are often 
   long and complex. - Roberto Assagioli 


The Ubuntu team is very pleased to announce the release of 
Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS (Long-Term Support) for Desktop, Server, 
Cloud, and Core products. The Ubuntu LTS flavors are also 
being released today.

In the 12.04.1 release, we’ve added support for the Calxeda ECX-1000 
SoC family, so businesses can prepare for a datacentre dominated by 
low-energy, hyperscale servers by testing their workloads 
on the new hardware now.

The Ubuntu Cloud Archive also makes its debut - essentially 
an online software repository from which administrators can 
download the latest versions of OpenStack for use with the 
latest long-term support (LTS) release of Ubuntu. 

Certified 12.04.1 Ubuntu Cloud images are now available on 
Amazon Web Services and will soon be posted to Windows Azure 
as well.

This point release has numerous updates integrated, and updated 
installation media has been provided so that fewer updates will 
need to be downloaded after installation.  These include 
security updates and corrections for other high-impact bugs, with a focus 
on maintaining stability and compatibility with Ubuntu 12.04 LTS.

Kubuntu 12.04.1 LTS, Edubuntu 12.04.1 LTS, Xubuntu 12.04.1 LTS, 
Mythbuntu 12.04.1 LTS, and Ubuntu Studio 12.04.1 LTS are now
available as well.  More details can be found in their announcements:

Edubuntu http://edubuntu.org/news/12.04.1-release
Xubuntu: http://xubuntu.org/news/12-04.1-release
Kubuntu: http://kubuntu.org/news/
Mythbuntu: http://mythbuntu.org/


To get Ubuntu 12.04.1
-

In order to download Ubuntu 12.04.1, visit:

http://www.ubuntu.com/download

Users of Ubuntu 10.04 and 11.10 will be offered an automatic 
upgrade to 12.04.1 via Update Manager. For further information 
about upgrading, see:

http://www.ubuntu.com/download/desktop/upgrade

As always, upgrades to the latest version of Ubuntu are entirely free of charge.

We recommend that all users read the 12.04.1 release notes, which document 
caveats and workarounds for known issues, as well as more in-depth notes on 
the release itself. They are available at:

http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes

Find out what's new in this release with a graphical overview:

http://www.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/whats-new
http://www.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/features

If you have a question, or if you think you may have found a bug 
but aren't sure, you can try asking in any of the following places:

#ubuntu on irc.freenode.net
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
http://www.ubuntuforums.org
http://askubuntu.com


Help Shape Ubuntu
-

If you would like to help shape Ubuntu, take a look at the list 
of ways you can participate at:

http://www.ubuntu.com/community/get-involved


About Ubuntu


Ubuntu is a full-featured Linux distribution for desktops, laptops, 
clouds and servers, with a fast and easy installation and regular 
releases. A tightly-integrated selection of excellent applications 
is included, and an incredible variety of add-on software is just a 
few clicks away.

Professional services including support are available from Canonical 
and hundreds of other companies around the world.  For more 
information about support, visit:

http://www.ubuntu.com/support


More Information


You can learn more about Ubuntu and about this release on our 
website listed below:

http://www.ubuntu.com

To sign up for future Ubuntu announcements, please subscribe to 
Ubuntu's very low volume announcement list at:

http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-announce



On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team,
Kate Stewart


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Quantal Feature Freeze - now in effect.

2012-08-23 Thread Kate Stewart
Hello Ubuntu Developers,
 
   2100 UTC has now passed and we are in Feature Freeze[1] for Quantal.
Many thank yous to those developers who got their tested work in 
on time!  The focus from here until release is on fixing bugs and
polishing.   Our next upcoming milestone release[2] is Beta 1 on 
September 6th.

Thanks,
Kate Stewart
on behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FeatureFreeze
[2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/ReleaseSchedule


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


12.04.1 Freeze updates

2012-08-16 Thread Kate Stewart
Dear Developers and Testers,

  The data center move had a few surprises, and some of you may have
noticed we haven't had working image builders today.As a result,
the last builds and testing prior to final freeze have been impacted.

Fixes to be included in 12.04.1 should still be validated by 
2100 UTC and copied into -updates. (original FinalFreeze). 

To give us time to get the final adjustments made (and
builders to get back online and caught up),  candidate images 
for 12.04.1 are targetted to be published on the iso tracker 
on 8/17.

We're pushing out the 12.04.1 Release Note Freeze until 
2100 UTC 8/20.

Kate,
on behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


upcoming 12.04.1 release plans...

2012-08-02 Thread Kate Stewart
Dear Developers and Testers, 

As of 2100 UTC,  we have started creating the images and ramping towards
getting Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS ready to ship.   All key fixes we want in
12.04.1 should now be in precise-proposed (or at least queued up to be
accepted). 

We are now building daily images again for all the LTS images that will
make up the 12.04.1 release.   Precise daily images can be found on:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/204/builds
Please try them out, and report on the iso tracker if you see tests
passing or any issues.

What’s going to be happening between now and when we release on 8/23?

now - 8/9  Daily images built from -proposed,  
smoke testing, finding blockers (and fixing).
No uploads accepted into -proposed without 
stable/release team ok.
Fixes moved from -proposed to -updates.
8/10 -8/16 Daily images built from -updates,  all key fixes 
should now be in -updates.  
Fixes again accepted in -proposed that won’t be pushed 
to -updates until after 12.04.1 comes out.
Smoke testing, critical blockers and security updates 
until final freeze.
Release note updates.
8/17-8/22  Candidate 12.04.1 image set produced and all mandatory 
tests executed.
Images only respun on demand if absolutely necessary.
8/2312.04.1 released. 


If you have any questions,  please feel free to ping Stéphane Graber
(stgraber), Dave Walker (Daviey) or myself (skaet) in #ubuntu-release
channel.

Thank you for all your efforts over the last couple of months on
polishing up 12.04! 

Kate Stewart, 
on behalf of the Ubuntu Release and Ubuntu Stable Release Teams


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


12.10 (Quantal Quetzal) Alpha 3 Released!

2012-07-26 Thread Kate Stewart
Welcome to Quantal Quetzal Alpha 3 image set, which will in time
become the 12.10 release. 

Pre-releases of Quantal Quetzal are *not* encouraged for anyone 
needing a stable system or anyone who is not comfortable running 
into occasional, even frequent breakage.  They are, however, 
recommended for Ubuntu developers and those who want to help in 
testing, reporting, and fixing bugs as we work towards getting 
this release ready.

Alpha 3 is the third in a series of milestone images that will be
released throughout the Quantal development cycle, in addition to
our daily development images.  The Alpha images are known to be 
reasonably free of showstopper CD build or installer bugs, while 
representing a very recent snapshot of Quantal.  You can download 
them here:

   http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/quantal/alpha-3/
   (Ubuntu Desktop, Server)

Additional images are also available at:

   http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/releases/quantal/alpha-3/ 
   (Ubuntu Server Cloud)
   http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/netboot/quantal/
   (Ubuntu Netboot) 
   http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-core/releases/quantal/alpha-3/
   (Ubuntu Core)
   http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/releases/quantal/alpha-3/
   (Kubuntu)
   http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/edubuntu/releases/quantal/alpha-3/
   (Edubuntu)
   http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/quantal/alpha-3/
   (Lubuntu)
   http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/releases/quantal/alpha-3/
   (Xubuntu)
   http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/releases/quantal/alpha-3/
   (Ubuntu Studio)

Alpha 3 includes a number of software updates that are ready for wider
testing.  This is an early set of images, so you should expect
some bugs.  For a more detailed description of the changes in the Alpha
3 release and the known bugs (which can save you the effort of reporting
a duplicate bug, or help you find proven workarounds), please see:

  http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/

If you're interested in following the changes as we further develop
Quantal, we suggest that you subscribe initially to the
ubuntu-devel-announce list. This is a low-traffic list (a few posts a
week) carrying announcements of approved specifications, policy changes,
alpha releases, and other interesting events.

  http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-announce


Kate Stewart, on behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Quantal Alpha 3 milestone release prep

2012-07-23 Thread Kate Stewart
Dear Developers,

   We'll be starting to spin the images for Quantal Alpha 3 tonight. 

   We'll be continuing with the processes we used in Alpha 2, since they
seem to work fairly well, until the tooling is deployable. 
For this milestone following rules will apply:
  - If a package is needed to fix a bug that would block the 
milestone, it should still be uploaded to quantal.
  - If a package does not touch any of the images, 
it can still be uploaded to quantal.
  - All other uploads should be done to quantal-proposed first.  
In particular, an upload that will increase the count of
uninstallable packages in main, even temporarily, MUST be 
done to quantal-proposed instead of to quantal.  
Affected uploads include:
 - all shared library packages (due to multiarch)
 - any uploads that will leave packages uninstallable on 
   one architecture while the autobuilders catch up 
   (due to out-of-sync Arch: all / Arch: any binary packages)
 - any packages that introduce new versioned Conflicts/Breaks 
   and require coordination between multiple source packages

If you have any questions about where you should upload, please ask on
#ubuntu-release first.


Technical Overview information for Alpha 3 can be added to the WIKI 
page at: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/TechnicalOverview/Alpha3


Thank you for your help getting Alpha 3 ready to ship.

Kate Stewart
on behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team. 







-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


12.10 (Quantal Quetzal) Alpha 2 Released!

2012-06-28 Thread Kate Stewart
Welcome to the Quantal Quetzal Alpha 2 image set, which will in time
become the 12.10 release. 

Pre-releases of Quantal Quetzal are *not* encouraged for anyone 
needing a stable system or anyone who is not comfortable running 
into occasional, even frequent breakage.  They are, however, 
recommended for Ubuntu developers and those who want to help in 
testing, reporting, and fixing bugs as we work towards getting 
this release ready.

Alpha 2 is the second in a series of milestone images that will be
released throughout the Quantal development cycle, in addition to
our daily development images.  The Alpha images are known to be 
reasonably free of showstopper CD build or installer bugs, while 
representing a very recent snapshot of Quantal.  You can download 
them here:

   http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/quantal/alpha-2/ 
   (Ubuntu Desktop, Server)

Additional images are also available at:

   http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/releases/quantal/alpha-2/ 
   (Ubuntu Server Cloud)
   http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/releases/quantal/alpha-2/
   (Kubuntu)
   http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/edubuntu/releases/quantal/alpha-2/
   (Edubuntu)
   http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/quantal/alpha-2/
   (Lubuntu)
   http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/releases/quantal/alpha-2/
   (Xubuntu)
   http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/releases/quantal/alpha-2/
   (Ubuntu Studio)

Alpha 2 includes a number of software updates that are ready for wider
testing.  This is an early set of images, so you should expect
some bugs.  For a more detailed description of the changes in the Alpha
2 release and the known bugs (which can save you the effort of reporting
a duplicate bug, or help you find proven workarounds), please see:

  http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/

If you're interested in following the changes as we further develop
Quantal, we suggest that you subscribe initially to the
ubuntu-devel-announce list. This is a low-traffic list (a few posts a
week) carrying announcements of approved specifications, policy changes,
alpha releases, and other interesting events.

  http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-announce


Kate Stewart, on behalf of the Ubuntu release team


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Quantal Alpha 2 milestone release prep

2012-06-25 Thread Kate Stewart
Dear Developers,

   We'll be starting to spin the images for Quantal Alpha 2 tonight. 

  The experiment we used during Alpha 1 seems to have worked out fairly
well :), so we'll be continuing with it in Alpha 2 until better tooling
is available.   For this milestone following rules will apply:
  - If a package is needed to fix a bug that would block the 
milestone, it should still be uploaded to quantal.
  - If a package does not touch any of the images, 
it can still be uploaded to quantal.
  - All other uploads should be done to quantal-proposed first.  
In particular, an upload that will increase the count of
uninstallable packages in main, even temporarily, MUST be 
done to quantal-proposed instead of to quantal.  
Affected uploads include:
 - all shared library packages (due to multiarch)
 - any uploads that will leave packages uninstallable on 
   one architecture while the autobuilders catch up 
   (due to out-of-sync Arch: all / Arch: any binary packages)
 - any packages that introduce new versioned Conflicts/Breaks 
   and require coordination between multiple source packages

Auto syncs of packages from Debian Unstable have been stopped until we
release A2.

If you have any questions about where you should upload, please ask on
#ubuntu-release first.


Thank you for your help getting Alpha 2 ready to ship.

Kate Stewart
on behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team. 






-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: [Lubuntu] Release Meeting 2012-06-22

2012-06-21 Thread Kate Stewart
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 19:38 +0200, Julien Lavergne wrote:
 Hi,
 
 === What was done engineering wise? ===
  * Work on the new session manager, to be ready just after A2
  * Initial work on the new artwork.
 
  === What's about to land that might impact the other teams and release as a 
 whole? ===
  * Nothing
 
 === Summary of bugs working on by team (reasonably reliable) ===
  * Nothing specific
 
 === Dependencies on other teams to make deliverables, blocking items,release 
 wide concerns? ===
  * Nothing

Will Lubuntu be participating in A2 given the new session manager won't
be showing up until after?

Thanks,  Kte


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: [Desktop] Release Meeting 2012-06-15

2012-06-15 Thread Kate Stewart
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 12:17 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
 === What was done engineering wise? ===
 
   * Ongoing work on hybrid graphics support
   * X.org 1.12 is now available in ubuntu-x-swat/x-stagin
   * Continued on SRUs for precise
   * Updated GNOME a11y stack to latest unstable release
   * Uploaded PulseAudio 2.0 to quantal
   * The next SRU round for the unity stack is being prepared

Any feel for when this might be landing?

What about the next update to unity for quantal?

   * Libreoffice 3.5.4 SRU has been uploaded and is waiting for SRU team 
 review
   * The work on the system compositor advanced enough to start the 
 lightdm work
   * The work for the ui redesign of the third party drivers started
 
 === What's about to land that might impact the other teams and release 
 as a whole? ===
 
   * GTK 3.5 is ready for upload (will likely be uploaded on monday)
   * the one compiz source compiz version should be uploaded next week
   * xorg-server 1.12 should be iploaded next week

 
 === Summary of bugs working on by team (reasonably reliable) ===
 
   * No specific list yet for quantal
 
 === Dependencies on other teams to make deliverables, blocking items, 
 release wide concerns? ===
 
   * Unity work in quantal is blocked on the gcc 4.7,libsigc,stl issues 
 discussed on ubuntu-devel:
   https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2012-June/035310.html
 
 



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: [QA Community] Release Meeting 2012-06-08

2012-06-12 Thread Kate Stewart
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 13:28 -0400, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
 Part Deux, the non-abbreviated addition:
 
 === What was done engineering wise? ===
 * During the planned week of pre-testing (which was announced late in
 the week, and therefore only had ~3-4 days of pre-testing), 9 people ran
 21 testcases and 11 bugs were reported. At least 4 bugs reported were
 caught in time to be fixed on 6/04 in the initial alpha 1 builds.
 Overall, the combined total number of daily testers prior to alpha one
 was 14 with a total of 66 testcases and 18 bugs reported. Alpha two will
 ensure the planned pre-week of testing, with a focus on more folks
 running the daily iso and report issues before the milestone.
 * During alpha 1, 37 people participated, giving us 100% mandatory test
 coverage for the final iso spins for ubuntu desktop images. This is
 quite a testament given the 11+? respins of alpha one!
There were 3 sets of images published (respins) of Alpha 1.   
There were 11 fixes tracked for the release, multiple fixes were include
in each of the respins. 

  This represents
 an excellent start on fulfilling the commitment to assure quality
 throughout the release; and the 100% coverage is atypical to previous
 alpha 1 releases. For a full report, please see
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/ReleaseReports/QuantalAlpha1TestReport.
 * The QATracker staging site contains the first call for testing
 utilizing the qatracker. The goal is to enable better metrics tracking,
 as well as consolidate feedback and make it easier for testers to test.
 As of writing, interest expressed in using the kernel has been strong
 (and seemingly installations), but results submitted are still lacking.
 
 === What's about to land that might impact the other teams and release
 as a whole? ===
 
 * Next week should have further feedback on utilizing the new qatracker
 to conduct calls for testing
 * Will be meeting with ubuntu flavors teams (and community) to discuss
 QA best practices
 * Will be reviewing alpha one process and results to help improve alpha
 two -- happy to hear feedback on good/bad
 
 === Summary of bugs working on by team (reasonably reliable) ===
 
 * N/A
 
 === Dependencies on other teams to make deliverables, blocking items,
 release wide concerns? ===
 
 * On-going dependency on the new qatracker codebase to release to
 jump-start further manual testing, SRU testing, and calls for testing
 * Community Unity testing process is still being finalized; needs to fit
 into the new structure
 
 Thanks,
 Nicholas
 
 On 06/08/2012 11:27 AM, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
  === What was done engineering wise? === 
  * Alpha One ISO Testing (and release :-) )
  * Call for testing 12.10 kernel on 12.04
 
   === What's about to land that might impact the other teams and release as 
  a whole? ===
 
  * N/A
 
  === Summary of bugs working on by team (reasonably reliable) === 
 
  * N/A
 
  === Dependencies on other teams to make deliverables, blocking items, 
  release wide concerns? ===
 
  * N/A
 
  Thanks,
  Nicholas
 
 
 
 



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Reminder, no meeting on tomorrow, follow up with teams on email.

2012-06-07 Thread Kate Stewart
Hi,
   Thank you for all your efforts in getting our Alpha 1 milestone out
the door.  :)

   Just a reminder that since we released a milestone today, we won't be
having a on Friday in #ubuntu-meeting.  Please submit your weekly
updates by email, and follow up by email this week.


Upcoming dates:
  2012/06/28 - Alpha 2
  2012/07/05 - Debian Import Freeze

Thanks, Kate
   



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: [Lubuntu] Release Meeting 2012-05-25

2012-05-24 Thread Kate Stewart
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 19:47 +0200, Julien Lavergne wrote:
 Hi,
 
 === What was done engineering wise? ===
 * Re-Sync with Debian
 * Working on the work items for Q
 (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/lubuntu-q-work-items)

It needed some state changing so it would show up on the tracker
(it must be approved with a priority set), so I went ahead and tweaked
it.

Have also in and created: 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/topic-quantal-flavor-lubuntu

and linked your blueprint to it. so it should be showing up on the
status.ubuntu.com site in the near future. 

Let me know if you have questions, or it doesn't show up.

Thanks, Kate


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: Merging SRU and release team, leaving

2012-05-23 Thread Kate Stewart
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 11:57 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
 Hello all,
 
 since there's some concern about merging the teams, and I don't have a
 strong opinion either, let's ditch the idea for now?

That seems to be the consensus from the list discussion.  I'll update
the UDS blueprints and artifacts to refer to this thread, and reflect
it.

 
 So I guess what remains of my original mail is the proposal to have a
 more regular schedule of who does SRUs. I already have my hands full
 with cleaning up my remaining 13 work items and doing some stable+1
 stuff before I move to QA in June, so I'm afraid I won't have too much
 time for SRUs any more.

Clint, Chris - what are each of you signing up for? 

Thanks, Kate





-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: Merging SRU and release team, leaving

2012-05-23 Thread Kate Stewart
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 07:55 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
 I'm willing to help out with SRU team work. I certainly don't have enough 
 time to offset your departure, but I should be able to do some of it.

Thanks Scott.  :)


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


12.10 Alpha 3 Milestone - proposed change

2012-05-23 Thread Kate Stewart
In working through the interlock [1] for Quantal it looks like
we're going to be stressing our QA teams with 12.04.1 and Alpha 3
landing in August.

Does anyone see concerns if we move Alpha 3 to July 26?  
If no concerns raised on the list, or in the weekly release meeting
this Friday,  we'll go forward with this.

Thanks, Kate

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/ReleaseInterlock



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: Timing of EOL notices

2012-05-18 Thread Kate Stewart
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 10:58 -0500, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
 Hi Kate,
 
 I took an action item at UDS to discuss with the release team the timing
 of the EOL notices. Because we are currently backporting the kernel (and
 eventually X stack) to earlier releases, the timing of the EOL notice
 has an effect on the support for people running an LTS with backported
 kernel/X packages. Because the security, kernel and desktop teams will
 stop performing security updates past the EOL, it the EOL happens
 earlier than the release day, there can be a gap in support.
 
 A specific example: 10.10 was EOLd in early April this year. 10.04 LTS
 users with a backported maverick kernel therefore no longer received
 security updates for this kernel after the EOL announcement (naturally),
 but these users did not have a viable upgrade path to maintain security
 support. They couldn't go to 10.10 (it was just made EOL) and 12.04 LTS
 was not released yet. I suggest the EOL announcement go out on the
 Friday or Monday after release such that there is at least a day of
 overlap. This is still within the spirit of 18 months support, even if
 it is actually off be a few days.

How do you feel about it being release + 2 week task?  That will account
for the 25/27 week split,  and still give us the 18 months.  I don't
think the pattern of 10.10 will happen again, so it should be treated as
a once of, rather than systemic problem. 

Challenge is that there are a lot of events to track around the release
going out,  and bringing the new release on line.   Adding the shutting
down and cross checking that needs to happen, risks confusions
occuring.  

Will release+2 weeks to shut down the -18month release work for your
team?

Kate.


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


weekly release meetings - start up for Quantal May 25

2012-05-17 Thread Kate Stewart
Hi,
   Just a quick note to let those interested know that weekly release
meetings for Quantal will start up on May 25th.  Alpha 1 is June 7th,
and its coming up fast ;). 

We'll be continuing with the format of teams sending email status to
this mail list (the day before this time) [1], and then having an open
session for discussion of cross team issues in the meeting.

The individual team reports should be mailed to ubuntu-release by 1900
UTC on Thursday,  so that all the teams have time to review before the
meeting.  There is an updated template[2] to use for the team status,
based on the discussions at UDS .

Let me know if there are any questions.

Thanks,
Kate


[1]https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-q-release-communication
[2]https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReleaseTeam/Meeting/Agenda/TeamTemplate




-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Precise Unseeded Universe Final Freeze now in effect.

2012-04-24 Thread Kate Stewart

Dear Developer,
The Unseeded Universe Final Freeze is now in effect. This
effectively finishes up the changes going into the Precise Ubuntu
archive for the release.
  
Iain Lane has kindly gathered some precise statistics ;) (see below)
summarizing what has occurred in the Ubuntu project archive this cycle.

Thank you to the 386 uploaders, and all those who have been contributing
by reviews and feedback,  allowing us to get the archive in such good
shape for our LTS release!  :)

On behalf of the Ubuntu release team,  Thank you!!!

Kate



386 uploaders

18630 non-rebuild non-langpack uploads (including auto-syncs) (12636 excluding)

Uploads by day (non-automatic only)

 dow | count 
-+---
   Tuesday   |  2722
   Wednesday |  2398
   Monday|  2266
   Thursday  |  2255
   Friday|  2092
   Saturday  |  2065
   Sunday|  1318

Top 15 packages by number of uploads

source | count 
---+---
 debian-installer  |64
 lxc   |53
 ubiquity  |42
 libvirt   |39
 linux |38
 gnome-control-center  |38
 gnome-settings-daemon |36
 cobbler   |34
 nautilus  |34
 whoopsie-daisy|33
 byobu |32
 firefox   |31
 nova  |31
 thunderbird   |29
 gtk+3.0   |28

Sponsors

 signed_by_name  | count 
-+---
 Jonathan Riddell|   212
 Daniel Holbach  |   171
 Martin Pitt |   112
 Scott Kitterman |62
 Ken VanDine |56
 Colin Watson|54
 Sebastien Bacher|51
 Micah Gersten   |46
 James Page  |39
 Fabrice Coutadeur   |35
 Luke Yelavich   |28
 Felix Geyer |27
 Andrew Starr-Bochicchio |23
 Stefano Rivera  |22
 Stéphane Graber |20





-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: Release Team Members: input requested...

2012-04-03 Thread Kate Stewart
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 16:12 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
 Hi Kate,
 
 On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 04:54:43PM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote:
  4/12 - Final Freeze[1] - ALL fixes should go into -proposed,  and 
only copied into -release after review meeting.   Full
QA ISO testing run done at start, to identify problem cases.
Release team meets daily for 1/2 hour at 1600 GMT in
#ubuntu-release to figure out which fixes we want to 
include in overnight images,  and determine who is best match 
for reviewing them for risk/upside, and copy vs. rebuild into 
-release.  There should be no fixes being added, unless its
a fix that a member of the release team specifically  
requests.  Images continue to be built daily.All packages
should be reviewed and built by 2300 GMT in -release, so they
can be included in the nightly builds.
 
 A daily review meeting seems like a lot of overhead just to have packages
 doled out for review.  Why should this be a daily meeting, as opposed to
 release team members claiming packages as they come in the queue and
 reviewing them immediately?
 
 I can certainly see that we might need more coordination between team
 members about what's actually going in, for you to have better control over
 what's going to trigger image respins.  I just have my doubts that a meeting
 is the most effective way to accomplish that.

If you've got better suggestions on how we can keep in synch with who's
doing what reviews,  etc.  I'm definitely interested.   If we had a
queue audit,  this would be less of an issue.  But we don't have the
queue audit and people don't remember to always flag in the channel that
they were the reviewers of a package,  so there's definitely been some
wasted time,  tracking down why something was approved.  

Also there have been a couple of times where people have flagged things
NOT to approve in the channel,  but left them in the queue as SRU
targets, and someone else later came along and let them in.   Would like
to avoid seeing this happen this time around.

 
 Also, to the point in the my mail that -proposed is unnecessary overhead in
 the case where we know it's not causing uninstallability and we know we're
 going to take the fix: if we're asking whether to copy from -proposed vs.
 rebuilding into release, that's usually a good sign we shouldn't have
 used -proposed for it in the first place.

Fair enough,  maybe we should look at it the other way,  and if things
are uploaded to -release queue,  and its clear they may cause issues,
but we might want them as SRU or opportunity targets maybe rejecting and
requesting they be uploaded to -proposed?   

Kate



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: Release Team Members: input requested...

2012-04-03 Thread Kate Stewart
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 09:47 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
 Steve Langasek [2012-04-02 15:45 -0700]:
  On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 05:59:16PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
   On Monday, April 02, 2012 04:54:43 PM Kate Stewart wrote:
   ...
4/12 - Final Freeze[1] - ALL fixes should go into -proposed,  and
  only copied into -release after review meeting.  
   
  
   In that past we've started directing uploads to -proposed to make them
   available for SRU verification right at release.  I see some potential in
   the end game for this new use of proposed to conflict with the old one. 
   We should sort out how that's going to work in advance.
 
 Actually, for packages where we are not 100% sure about, the nice
 thing with that is that we can have it in -proposed, test it, and at
 that point still decide whether we want to copy to -updates or
 release.
 
  Yes; furthermore, given that we have to manually approve any uploads through
  the 'unapproved' queue anyway, if it's a fix that we know up front that we
  want on the CDs and it doesn't cause archive uninstallabilities, it would be
  more straightforward to just have these packages uploaded to the release
  pocket instead of incurring the overhead of pocket copies.
 
 I agree. Those should be the 100% sure cases.
 
  The flipside is that we don't want to be having to bounce lots of packages
  back out of -release and ask people to reupload to -proposed.  So maybe this
  could be done as, no uploads to the release pocket without prior sign-off?
 
 LGTM.
 
Seems reasonable to me. 

Kate


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: [Systems] Release Meeting 2012-03-30

2012-04-02 Thread Kate Stewart
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 14:06 +0100, Andrea Cimitan wrote:
 NOTE: 12.04 wallpaper set should be ready soon, we are creating the package.
 The default wallpaper remains mostly the same, but I'd recommend to 
 update screenshots used in public websites.

Web team will be taking screen shots the week before release,  so it
should all work out. 

Thanks, Kate



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Release Team Members: input requested...

2012-04-02 Thread Kate Stewart
Dear Release Team members,
Thank you for your excellent work in getting our Beta 2 out the
door! :)  The use of -proposed for the first time was very cool to see
in action and made the Unity and late Kernel changes go a lot smoother
than they would have otherwise.  The new queue bot was very useful at
keeping down the adrenaline as well.  :)

Now that Beta 2 is out, and we're entering the last stretch before
we put out the 12.04 LTS[1],  there are a couple of things we need to
figure out for the remainder of the month,  especially on how we want to
be managing the archive frozen period, and -proposed.  A goal for this
release is to have the image we produce at the start of the release
candidate window be a true release candidate, and any images from final
freeze on be potentially shippable.  The schedules were earlier aligned
to permit this, now its time to figure out rest of details...

   For the past 2 releases[2][3], we've kept the archive frozen after
Beta 2 went out, until Final Freeze[4].  This time we've got two weeks
until now and the Final freeze,  so keeping it frozen and asking for
review of all the bug fixes, etc. throughout would be a lot of work.  On
the other hand,  if we want to be able to have TRUE release candidate
image, a week before release,  we need to start the hard choices about
what fixes go in, and which ones go to SRUs,  before the Final
Freeze[4], based on past experiences.We also now have -proposed to
leverage here, and experiment with as part of this.  

   To mitigate risk, and make effective use of the release team's review
cycles,  I'd like to propose we try out the following for any packages
in our seeded images (main+universe):

now-4/5 - Archive stays open to bug fixes and approved FFes only.
4/5 - KernelFreeze[5],  and archive goes into pre-release freeze
  state at 2100.  Release team reviews all patches targetted 
  to -release.  SRUs can start to go into -proposed, and 
  get reviewed at discretion of release team for opportunity
  inclusion into -release.
4/12 - Final Freeze[1] - ALL fixes should go into -proposed,  and 
  only copied into -release after review meeting.   Full
  QA ISO testing run done at start, to identify problem cases.
  Release team meets daily for 1/2 hour at 1600 GMT in
  #ubuntu-release to figure out which fixes we want to 
  include in overnight images,  and determine who is best match 
  for reviewing them for risk/upside, and copy vs. rebuild into 
  -release.  There should be no fixes being added, unless its
  a fix that a member of the release team specifically  
  requests.  Images continue to be built daily.All packages
  should be reviewed and built by 2300 GMT in -release, so they
  can be included in the nightly builds.
4/19 - CandidateWindowStarts[6] - from this point forward, any of
  images produced could be the final one.  CRON job is disabled. 
  The full set of QA results needs to be gathered on these 
  images. Continue with daily release team meetings to agree 
  if any additional fixes in -proposed MUST be included,  and 
  let QA teams know explicitly if another round of full manual
  testing is going to be needed. 
4/26 - Ship it.

Does this seem like a reasonable way to leverage -proposed?  spread the
release team review work to where it matters most and still accomplish
goal?   alternatives?

Also, for those packages that are in unseeded universe,  FFes and fixes 
will continue to be reviewed and accepted into -release until the
FinalUnseededUniverseFreeze at April 24 at 0900 UTC (per earlier
discussions [1]. Iain, Stefan, Stefano, Scott, Iulian - will one of
you volunteer to be the focal point contact?   Am assuming you all be
using #ubuntu-motu to discuss/monitor unseeded universe during the time
from when the archive freezes?   Is this correct?

Any other questions/issues/thoughts on the upcoming month?   If the
above seems reasonable I'll start updating the checklists[8] to reflect
this, and working with the other teams to get us all coordinated. 

Thanks, Kate
 

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PrecisePangolin/ReleaseSchedule
[2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OneiricReleaseSchedule
[3] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NattyReleaseSchedule
[4] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FinalFreeze
[5] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelFreeze
[6] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CandidateWindowStarts
[7] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UnseededUniverseFinalFreeze
[8] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReleaseCandidateProcess




-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Proposed new release team member

2012-03-30 Thread Kate Stewart
Dear Ubuntu Release Team members, 

   I'd like to propose Stéphane Graber ( Edubuntu co-lead, Foundations
team,  IRC: stgraber) as a new release team member.

   With all the change he's been making to the release infrastructure 
to make all of our lives easier (new iso tracker, improved channel queue 
bot to work with iso tracker and frozen queues), as well as his 
technical expertise on Edubuntu and sorting out some of the nasty 
foundation problems, having him as a formal member seems a very useful 
addition to the team.  

   I've discussed this with some of you already, but I'd appreciate
opinions in reply to this mail so we can have it on the record.

Thanks, 
Kate


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (Precise Pangolin) Beta 2 Released.

2012-03-29 Thread Kate Stewart
The Ubuntu team is pleased to announce the final beta release of Ubuntu
12.04 LTS (Long-Term Support) Desktop, Server, Cloud, and Core products.

Codenamed Precise Pangolin, 12.04 continues Ubuntu's proud tradition 
of integrating the latest and greatest open source technologies into a
high-quality, easy-to-use Linux distribution.  The team has been hard 
at work through this cycle, introducing a few new features but mostly
fixing bugs.

With Ubuntu 12.04,  Kubuntu, Edubuntu, Xubuntu, Lubuntu, Mythbuntu and 
Ubuntu Studio also reached Beta 2 status today.


Ubuntu Changes
--

Some of the key new features available since Beta 1 are:

 * A new Ubuntu kernel (3.2.0-20.33) which is base on the v3.2.12
   upstream Linux kernel.  Changes to the default kernel flavours 
   have been made for 12.04 LTS.

 * Updates to our new way to quickly search and access any desktop 
   application's and indicator's menu, called the HUD, can be 
   accessed by taping the Alt key and entering characters.

 * LibreOffice has been updated to 3.5.1. 

 * Ubuntu One has a new control panel to provides an installer, 
   setup wizard, ability to add/remove folders to sync, and more


Please see http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/ for details.


Ubuntu Server and Cloud Images
--

 * 12.04 Beta 2 is shipping the latest milestones of OpenStack Essex
   (RC1), and will be upgraded to final before release.

 * Zentyal as well as OpenMPI 1.5 for ARM are now available in Universe.

 * KVM 1.0 on x86, which enables nested KVM by default, now allows a 
   virtualisation experience within cloud instances.



Ubuntu Core
---

Ubuntu Core is a minimal rootfs for use in the creation of custom
images, and now includes ARM hard float (armhf) images.   Developers 
can use Ubuntu Core as the basis for their application demonstrations,
constrained environment deployments, device support packages, and 
other goals.


Kubuntu
---

Kubuntu 12.04 Beta 2 introduces Kubuntu Active as a tech preview, 
which is a new Ubuntu flavour designed for tablet devices. 

Please see  https://wiki.kubuntu.org/PrecisePangolin/Beta2/Kubuntu for
details. 


Edubuntu


Edubuntu 12.04 Beta 2 ships with improved translations, and updates to 
the new epoptes and LTSP 5.3 releases.

For more details on what has changed in Edubuntu 12.04, please refer to
http://www.edubuntu.org.

Xubuntu
---

Xubuntu 12.04 Beta 2 now has new branding and further appearance 
tweaks have been made.  On i386 hardware, the non-PAE kernel is 
used to support a wider variety of machines.  Pavucontrol is now 
used over xfce4-mixer.

For more information about the changes in Xubuntu 12.04, please
go to http://xubuntu.org/.


Lubuntu
---

Lubuntu 12.04 has had its artwork updated,  and updates
made to LightDM.

For more information about the changes in Lubuntu 12.04, 
please go to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu.


Ubuntu Studio
-

Ubuntu Studio 12.04 Beta 2 live DVD now has a new low latency
kernel installed by default.  There is better Pulse Audio
to JACK bridging, an improved ice1712 mixer and ... the XFCE 
transition has finished!


Mythbuntu
-

Mythbuntu 12.04 Beta 2 contains a pre-release version of MythTV 0.25,
which will be updated to final as soon as its available.


Please see http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/precise/beta2 for more details
on the above products.


About Ubuntu


Ubuntu is a full-featured Linux distribution for desktops, laptops, and
servers, with a fast and easy installation and regular releases.  A
tightly-integrated selection of excellent applications is included, and
an incredible variety of add-on software is just a few clicks away.

Professional technical support is available from Canonical Limited and
hundreds of other companies around the world.  For more information
about support, visit http://www.ubuntu.com/support .

If you would like to help shape Ubuntu, take a look at the list of ways
you can participate at:  http://www.ubuntu.com/community/participate .

Your comments, bug reports, patches and suggestions really help us to
improve this and future releases of Ubuntu.   Instructions can be 
found at: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs .


To Get Ubuntu 12.04 Beta 2
--

To upgrade to Ubuntu 12.04 Beta 2 from Ubuntu 11.10, follow 
these instructions:

  https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PreciseUpgrades

Or, download Ubuntu 12.04 Beta 2 images from a location near you: 

  http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/download (Ubuntu and Ubuntu Server) . 

In addition they can be found at the following links:

  http://releases.ubuntu.com/precise/ (Ubuntu, Ubuntu Server)
  http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/releases/precise/beta-2/ 
  (Ubuntu Cloud Images)
  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/precise/beta-2/
  (Ubuntu DVD, preinstalled ARM images, source)
  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-core/releases/12.04/beta-2/
  (Ubuntu Core)
  

Precise Beta Freeze now in effect

2012-03-22 Thread Kate Stewart
Dear Developers,
   Beta Freeze[1] now in effect (Thursday, March 22nd).

   All uploads to the archive and any user user interface
changes will now have to be approved manually by the release 
team.  Some may be staged in -proposed before being copied 
into the release archive, at the discretion of the release team.

   The documentation team and translation teams will also need to be
notified of any further User Interface changes. 

Dear Documentation writers, 

   The one large piece that hasn't landed, and will impact the
interfaces is unity 5.8.0 and some dependent pieces [1].  Since
this is after freeze, we'll be using our new staging area, and 
uploading it to -proposed (hopefully tomorrow), and then moving it 
over after its checked out.   You may want to look at taking 
screen shots from the version in proposed, or their PPA, or wait 
until it lands in the release. 

Thank you for your cooperation,  

Kate,
on behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team.


[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BetaFreeze
[2] https://launchpad.net/unity/+milestone/5.8.0



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Release Meeting - new format trial

2012-03-09 Thread Kate Stewart
As agreed at the last weekly release meeting,  we'll be trying a new
format today of an open forum question and answer session for the weekly
release meeting. 

To make this efficient for everyone (and hopefully reduce confusion),
would appreciate it if everyone tried to follow these conventions.

At start of meeting,  please wave or say hi so we know you're present
and paying attention.

Once the topic, becomes Question and Answer Session, when you have a
new question to ask, or thread of conversation to start off, please
raise your hand o/   If your just asking a follow up
question/commenting on the current open question - just type.

When possible, please target your questions to specific individuals by
using their nick.   Others should feel free to comment if they have
information to add to the discussion.  

When you've finished your comments,  please use the convention .. so
we know you're done, and we can move on to the next queued up question.

I'll try to call on folks in the order I see o/s showing up after the
QA session starts.   

Once there are no more o/'s in the queue,  we'll end the meeting,
there won't be an any other business topic, etc.

Suggestions on improving the above conventions are most welcome.

I'll paste the above into the channel at the start of the meeting as
well so folks have it handy.

Thank you for your help in trying out this experiment.

Kate


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Ubuntu 10.04.4 (Lucid Lynx) LTS released!

2012-02-16 Thread Kate Stewart
Dear Lucid, Our Time Is Right Now  - Evans Blue


The Ubuntu team is proud to announce the release of Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS,
the fourth maintenance update to Ubuntu's 10.04 LTS release.  This
release includes updated server, desktop, alternate installation CDs 
and DVDs for the i386 and amd64 architectures.

The Kubuntu team is proud to announce the release of Kubuntu 10.04.4.
This release includes updated images for the desktop and alternate
installation CDs and DVDs for the i386 and amd64 architectures.

This is the last planned maintenance release for the 10.04 LTS series.  
Future security updates and bug fixes will be individually downloadable 
from the Ubuntu archive in the same way as before, but no further 
updates to installation media will be provided for 10.04 LTS.  The next 
LTS release, 12.04 LTS, will be released in April 2012.  We recommend 
that users installing Ubuntu after April install the latest LTS release.


To Get Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS
-

To download Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS visit:

desktop: http://www.ubuntu.com/download/ubuntu/download
server:  http://www.ubuntu.com/download/server/download

We recommend that all users read the release notes, which document
caveats and workarounds for known issues. They are available at:

http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1004


To get Kubuntu 10.04.4 visit:

http://www.kubuntu.org



About Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS


This is the fourth and last planned maintenance release of Ubuntu 10.04 
LTS, which continues to be supported with maintenance updates and security 
fixes until April 2013 on desktops and April 2015 on servers.

For the first time, this point release includes backported updated hardware 
support.  In addition, numerous post-release updates have been integrated, 
and a number of bugs in the installation system have been corrected. These 
include security updates and corrections for other high-impact bugs, with a 
focus on maintaining stability and compatibility with Ubuntu 10.04 LTS.

See http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/lucid for a full list of Ubuntu security
updates that have been applied to 10.04.4

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu for specific information about a
particular bug number. A complete list of post-release updates 
since 10.04.3 is available at:

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LucidLynx/ReleaseNotes/ChangeSummary/10.04.4


Helping Shape Ubuntu


If you would like to help shape Ubuntu, take a look at the list of ways
you can participate at:

http://www.ubuntu.com/community/participate/


About Ubuntu


Ubuntu is a full-featured Linux distribution for desktops, laptops,
netbooks and servers, with a fast and easy installation and regular 
releases. A tightly-integrated selection of excellent applications 
is included, and an incredible variety of add-on software is just 
a few clicks away.

Professional services including support are available from Canonical 
and hundreds of other companies around the world. For more information
about support, visit:

http://www.ubuntu.com/support


More Information


You can find out more about Ubuntu on our website:

http://www.ubuntu.com/

To sign up for future Ubuntu announcements, please subscribe to Ubuntu's
very low volume announcement list at:

http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-announce



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: [Kernel] Release Meeting 2012-02-03

2012-02-02 Thread Kate Stewart
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 13:38 -0800, Leann Ogasawara wrote:

 === Release Notes ===
 
 Alpha-2 notes were posted to
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PrecisePangolin/TechnicalOverview

it ended up at: 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PrecisePangolin/TechnicalOverview/Alpha2

Release Notes section is meant for things to go into the next set of
release notes - there will be tools extracting these sections
automatically;  so please only put things in here that you want to show
up in the Beta 1 release notes.  :)

Thanks, Kate



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: Publisher now running every 30 minutes

2011-12-16 Thread Kate Stewart
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 17:32 +, Colin Watson wrote:
 Following some intensive optimisation work, the Ubuntu archive publisher
 is now back [1] to running every 30 minutes, rather than on its previous
 hourly cycle.  I hope this will help developers iterate fixes more
 quickly, particularly when long dependency chains are involved.  We may
 miss the odd run as we iron out the occasional problem with this setup,
 but things are looking good so far; the last five runs have had more
 than five minutes of clearance each.
 
 [1] Long-timers may remember that before we switched the archive to
 Launchpad we were using dak on a 30-minute cycle; although the main
 thing optimised recently was actually something that would have
 affected dak too if we'd carried on running it for long enough with
 our setup.  See
 
 http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~cjwatson/blosxom/ubuntu/2011-10-24-quality-in-12-04.html.
 

Thanks for this Colin!  Great work!  :D

Release team members too will certainly appreciate this as well, when
waiting to respin those images during the milestones.

Kate


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: [Linaro] Release Meeting 2011-12-02

2011-12-06 Thread Kate Stewart
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 14:02 +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote:

 == Dependencies on other teams, blocking items ==
 
  * 
 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/ubuntu-arm-p-cross-compilable-packages
It needs to be approved. Which team is going to take care of the blueprint,
foundations?

Hi Steve,  
   This one has your name down as approver,  can you please review?

Thanks, Kate


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: [Certification] Release Meeting 2011-12-02

2011-12-06 Thread Kate Stewart
Thanks!  and thanks for putting the priorities on the blocking bugs :)

On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 13:39 -0500, Marc Legris wrote:
 Sure, I'll update the bugs if we find the same issues in Precise.
 
 On 12/06/2011 01:09 PM, Kate Stewart wrote:
  Hi Marc,
  When you do the certification run with Precise Alpha1 this week,
  could you indicate in your high blocking bugs if you're still seeing the
  problem in Precise?
  Was scanning through your blocking bugs I see they're mostly tagged
  to Oneiric, but I suspect they may be applicable to Precise as well.
  Good to get them figured out earlier in the release rather than later,
  esp. if they're blocking.
 
  Thanks, Kate
 



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: [QA] Release Meeting 2011-12-02

2011-12-05 Thread Kate Stewart


On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 14:27 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Lallement wrote:
 Hi All,
 
 == Blueprints and Status ==
   * Work Item Status for Precise: 
 http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-precise/canonical-platform-qa.html
   * Work Item Status for Alpha 1: 
 http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-precise/canonical-platform-qa-precise-alpha-1.html
 
 == Precise Alpha1 Testing ==
   * Testing Report: 
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/ReleaseReports/PreciseAlpha1TestReport
   * The pass rate is much higher than Oneiric Alpha 1, with 97.80% for 
 Precise A1 against 89.22% for Oneiric Alpha 1, and 18 bugs found in this 
 milestone against 39 for the same milestone in Oneiric. But the number 
 of critical and high importance defects are close (2 critical in both 
 and 9 high in Precise against 12 in Oneiric)

I'm not sure we can compare Oneiric Alpha1 with Precise Alpha 1, since
the Kubuntu images weren't tested with Precise.  

What do the bugs found per tests run numbers look like?   or just ubuntu
to ubuntu numbers? 

Thanks, Kate


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: New ISO testing tracker for Precise Alpha 1

2011-12-01 Thread Kate Stewart
Hi Stéphane,
   Just wanted to say thank you very much for this new ISO tracker and
all the work you and Jean-Baptiste put in to making the testing of it
during Alpha 1 possible.   :)

   Alpha 1 went MUCH smoother in this area than I had expected.
And love the fact that auto post the rebuilds works - its great to get
rid of that manual step. *\o/*  I think the new image history feature is
going to prove to be very useful as well.  

   Very much looking forward to it deploying and the new features
becoming available for alpha 2!!  

Thanks again,
Kate




-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: [Certification] Release Meeting 2011-12-02

2011-12-01 Thread Kate Stewart
Hi Marc,

On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 17:19 -0500, Marc Legris wrote:
 == Dependencies on other teams, blocking items ==
 
 Systems currently blocked and waiting on patches:
 [LINK] 
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bugs?field.tag=blocks-hwcert

Just went and looke at the bugs on the list, and there are 4 [1] there
without an importance set.   Can we make it a policy that any bug that
goes on that list always has an importance set on it?

Thanks, Kate

[1]
849216 [Thinkpad T520] Displayport nonfunctional Undecided Incomplete 
875365 [Thinkpad T420] Resuming from S3 hoses the system Undecided Confirmed
875781 [Thinkpad T420] Trackpad/Trackpoint inoperative Undecided Confirmed
891857 [Precision M6600] Unable to output video over HDMI Undecided Confirmed 



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Weekly Release Meeting - format change for Precise

2011-11-16 Thread Kate Stewart
Hi,
   Based on the discussions at UDS, we'll be changing the release
meeting format a bit going forward[1].   The consensus at the meeting
was to shorten the weekly IRC time down to just a QA round table
(hopefully around a 1/2 hour) with a more detailed team status getting
mailed before so folks can study and come up with questions before the
meeting[2].

To make this effective, it will mean that a team summary will need to be
mailed out to ubuntu-release at end of day on Thursday[3].  

For ease of people finding/filtering the emails,  please adhere to the
following syntax for header of these emails:
 
Subject: [team name] update

In the text of the message please include:
 * What was done engineering wise?
 * What's about to land that might impact the other teams?
 * Summary of bugs working on by team (reasonably reliable)
 * Dependencies on other teams, blocking items
 * Issues?
   
The first of the weekly meetings will start up this Friday, Nov. 18th.

I expect we'll be refining this as we go along,  so if there suggestions
on how to continue to make this more effective for folk, don't hesitate
to raise them.

Thanks, Kate


[1]https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-p-release-meeting
[2] Release meeting remains on Friday at 1600 UTC on #ubuntu-meeting on
Freenode IRC.
[2] When we release a milestone on that Thursday, plan is to then mail
out status on Friday and cancel IRC meeting.  There may be an ad hoc IRC
meeting called on monday if something is critical.


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


End of support for Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid Lynx) Netbook and ARM - 2011/10/29

2011-10-28 Thread Kate Stewart
Ubuntu announced the 10.04 Netbook Edition and Ubuntu for ARM products
18 months ago, on April 29, 2010.   At that time, Ubuntu committed to
ongoing security and critical fixes for a period of 18 months for these
specific products. 

This support period is now ending, and on October 29, 2011 the 10.04
Netbook Edition and Ubuntu for ARM products will no longer be supported.
Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Desktop and Server products continue to be supported.

The upgrade path from Ubuntu 10.04 Netbook and ARM is to Ubuntu 10.10.
Instructions and caveats for the upgrade may be found at
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/MaverickUpgrades.

Ubuntu 10.04 LTS for Desktop and Server products continues to be
actively supported with security updates and select high-impact bug
fixes. All announcements of official security updates for Ubuntu
releases are sent to the ubuntu-security-announce mailing list,
information about which may be found at
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-security-announce.

Since its launch in October 2004 Ubuntu has become one of the most
highly regarded Linux distributions with millions of users in homes,
schools, businesses and governments around the world. Ubuntu is Open
Source software, costs nothing to download, and users are free to
customise or alter their software in order to meet their needs.


Kate Stewart,
Ubuntu Release Manager


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Proposed Schedules for next few releases

2011-09-13 Thread Kate Stewart

Dear Release Team Members,

   Based on the developer input gathered by Alison earlier (Thanks!),
and other feedback received through this cycle,  I've updated the 
straw man proposals for the next 5 releases.

Highlights:  even them out from 28/24 weeks to 27/25 weeks.
Move Feature Freeze after Alpha drops and even out its timing
a bit too.  

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PReleaseSchedule  27 wks,  FF@18
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QReleaseSchedule  25 wks,  FF@17
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RReleaseSchedule  27 wks,  FF@18
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SReleaseSchedule  25 wks,  FF@17
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TReleaseSchedule  27 wks,  FF@18

Please review and let me know if you can see some factors overlooked, or
interactions that need to be considered.

At UDS-P we'll be doing a final review of the P Release Schedule
milestone dates and freezes, before removing the **DRAFT** from P
Release Schedule.

Thanks, Kate 


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


P Release - Interlock with other events

2011-09-13 Thread Kate Stewart
Dear Release Team members and other interested upstream developers

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PReleaseInterlock has been set up to track
interactions between other projects and Ubuntu Development release.

If you know of an upstream release date that we all should be aware of
and considering, please add it to the other community events column.

Thank you for your help with this,

Kate


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


FinalFreeze - implications on Universe?

2011-08-15 Thread Kate Stewart

Dear release team members, 

Based on some discussions we've been having on the other Freezes, would
like to see if there is consensus to make FinalFreeze[1], apply to
Universe as well as main. 

   Right now the process states:

For packages in universe that aren't seeded in any of the Ubuntu
flavors, this final freeze is nominal; packages must be manually
accepted by the archive admins, but no additional approval is required.

There's no timing on this,  but historically we've not been accepting
into the archive after a certain point. 

What is seeded is also a bit ambiguous these days as well.

So...

1) does it make sense to declare FinalFreeze to be freeze on all the
archive?

or 

2) do we want a separate explicit universe Freeze (and be clearer what
is ok to upload in the period between FinalFinal freeze, and this date)

or

3)...


Thoughts?

Thanks, Kate




[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FinalFreeze


-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Re: Default libjpeg-dev in oneiric

2011-07-29 Thread Kate Stewart
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 11:27 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
 On 07/29/2011 10:47 AM, Micah Gersten wrote:
  On 07/29/2011 02:39 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
  On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 06:13:49PM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote:
  On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 17:54 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
  CCing ubuntu-devel so people are aware of the issue
  Due to the accidental autosync, we pulled in a libjpeg8-dev that
  provides libjpeg-dev.  Should we revert that one change (not provide
  libjpeg-dev in libjpeg8) or should we try to do the transition?  There
  are a number of incomplete transitions ATM (libnotify, libssl, libav,
  boost1.4.6, and a few more with ~10 packages each).
  Attached are a list of rdepends affected.
  ...ouch.
  Given we'll be putting out the A3 release next week, and I don't believe
  this update and transition is essential, my preference would be to
  revert it for now,  and then after A3's out,  assess if if makes sense
  to pull it in and manage the transition, or wait until P-series for this
  one.   
  Given all the stuff about to land for A3 and Feature Freeze almost upon
  us, it seems a bit risky to add this in,  esp. with folks going on
  vacation right now.
  What do others think?
  I agree, best to back this out.  Micah, will you upload the necessary
  change?  (Sooner better than later, so we don't drift too much while
  libjpeg8-dev is the default?)
 
  Actually, libjpeg8-dev isn't the default ATM. Anything with libjpeg-dev
  as a build depend will FTBFS since 2 packages provide the same virtual
  libjpeg-dev package.  I'll prepare an upload to fix, but I need it
  sponsored still.
  Thanks,
  Micah
 
 This has been uploaded and should be available after the next publisher run.

Thanks Micah!  :)

Kate



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release


Unscheduled Debian Archive Synch

2011-07-27 Thread Kate Stewart
Dear Developers,

   As some of you may have noticed, we had an unscheduled Debian archive
sync earlier today.   This was caused by a javascript bug uncovered
while doing some final testing on the new launchpad native sync
capability (which will allow those developers with upload rights to sync
those packages they have upload rights for directly).  Basically a sync
only this package got translated into a sync everything. 

   To see if any of the packages you care about have been affected,
please review the attached files (any further updates can be found at
[1]):

- synced_in_main - list of main packages affected.

- synced_in_universe_multiverse - list of universe/multiverse packages
affected. 

- packages_with_diff: contains a list of those packages that got synced
even though there was an Ubuntu update already (yes, another bug was
found).  Didier has been manually cleaning these specific packages up,
but would appreciate additional review and help with a 
couple of the affected packages. 

  All of the affected packages have now been marked for building, so
there may be some instability until they get rebuilt and incorporated. 

  The launchpad team has reproduced the bug on their staging server and
will be doing further testing there.  We will be testing it again on the
live system to ensure no other inadvertent side effects before this
capability is generally rolled out.  

Thank you for your patience and help while we get this sorted.

Kate

[1] http://people.canonical.com/~didrocks/sync110727/

acl
attr
base-passwd
binfmt-support
chardet
cifs-utils
dblatex
dbus-python
debootstrap
doc-base
doxygen
ecj
enscript
exuberant-ctags
fonts-vlgothic
gccxml
gdb-doc
glew
gpsd
grep
hardening-wrapper
hwdata
ibus-anthy
ibus-pinyin
ibus-table
iso-codes
john
kcm-gtk
keyutils
lftp
libcap2
libdigest-hmac-perl
libgadu
libgwibber
libhtml-format-perl
libhtml-template-perl
libieee1284
libipc-run-perl
libisoburn
libisofs
libjpeg8
libpcap
libppix-regexp-perl
libtextwrap
libtirpc
libusb
libusb-1.0
libwibble
libx86
libxtst
lua5.1
lzo2
man-db
mpfr4
mtdev
mythes-it
neon27
obexd
portaudio19
pstoedit
pyenchant
pyudev
raptor2
rasqal
readline5
rpm
ruby1.8
scons
sphinx
squashfs-tools
tslib
ttf-liberation
u-boot
usb-modeswitch-data
wvdial
xserver-xorg-input-mouse
xserver-xorg-video-qxl
yui-compressor
acedb
adanaxisgpl
adjtimex
adolc
adonthell
advi
aesfix
aeskeyfind
alarm-clock-applet
alex
alure
amispammer
apache-upload-progress-module
apf-firewall
apt-file
ardentryst
arduino
aria2
arp-scan
aspectc++
atdgen
autoconf-archive
autojump
auto-multiple-choice
autossh
autotrace
avr-libc
backintime
basex
basic256
beanstalkd
betaradio
bindfs
biniou
bin-prot
biomaj
biosig4c++
bird
bitcoin
bluez-hcidump
bomstrip
bopm
botan1.8
bsaf
btag
bucardo
bwbasic
bzr-dbus
bzr-explorer
bzr-fastimport
bzr-loom
bzr-pipeline
cacti
cadabra
cairo-dock-plugins
calamaris
camelot
c++-annotations
ccfits
cctools
cdo
cduce
cgiemail
checkstyle
chron
cia-clients
ckeditor
ckermit
clanlib
clasp
classads
cl-hyperobject
clisp
cl-kmrcl
clojure1.2
clojure-contrib
clonalframe
cl-sql
clustershell
clzip
cmor
codegroup
coffeescript
coinor-cbc
coinor-flopc++
compass-susy-plugin
compass-yui-plugin
composite
cone
confget
convirt
courier-authlib
creepy
cronutils
cruft
csound
cupt
dailystrips
darktable
ddd
ddskk
debian-cd
debian-history
deets
device3dfx
dhcpcd
dhcpcd-ui
dh-make-perl
diakonos
dialog
diff-ext
discount
d-itg
djview4
dokuwiki
d-push
drupal6-mod-commentrss
drupal6-mod-filefield
drush
dsdp
dtc-xen
dwarfutils
dx
eet
eiciel
ekeyd
emerillon
enigma
epson-inkjet-printer-escpr
evernote-mode
expeyes
fastx-toolkit
fatattr
fcheck
febootstrap
feh
ffmpegthumbnailer
fizmo
fldigi
flickcurl
flightgear
fluidsynth-dssi
flumotion
flwm
focuswriter
fonts-horai-umefont
foreign
foxtrotgps
freebsd-buildutils
freebsd-utils
freedink-data
freepops
ftpwatch
fusioninventory-for-glpi
fuzzyocr
gameclock
game-data-packager
gammu
gargoyle-free
gaupol
gbirthday
gcap
gcc-avr
gdal
geany-plugins
gecode
gedit-plugins
geiser
gem2deb
geos
getmail4
gforth
gimp-plugin-registry
ginac
ginkgocadx
giplet
git-annex
git-buildpackage
git-cola
gitit
gitpkg
gjacktransport
gkrellm-x86info
glfw
globus-gridftp-server
glpi
gmic
gmtp
gnome-btdownload
gnome-subtitles
gnome-video-effects
gnujump
gnumed-server
gnunet-gtk
gnupg-pkcs11-scd
gozerbot
gphotofs
gpointing-device-settings
gpsk31
gri
grisbi
gsmartcontrol
gtk-gnutella
gtk-vector-screenshot
guidata
guiqwt
guymager
gwaei
gw-fonts-ttf
gyp
h5py
haskell-devscripts
haskell-dummy
hatari
hdf-eos4
hexer
hgnested
hgsubversion
hiredis
hitori
hodie
hp2xx
htmlcxx
httpcomponents-client
hugin
hydra
i3status
ibus-input-pad
ibus-skk
igv
ilisp
imagej
input-pad
ioquake3
ipwatchd
ipwatchd-gnotify
jabref
jags
jajuk
jaxe
jcc
jd
jquery-goodies
jqueryui
jsdoc-toolkit
jsonbot
jtreg
k3d
kdc2tiff
kdrill
keepass2
kernel-handbook
ketchup
kradio4
lastfm
latex-mk
lattice
lcms2
ldb
lemonldap-ng
libalgorithm-dependency-perl
libapache2-mod-authnz-external
libapache2-mod-xsendfile
libapache-mod-jk

Improving releases - feedback and ideas from 10.04.3

2011-07-27 Thread Kate Stewart
Last Friday (7/22), there was a feedback meeting held for the 10.04.3
point release.   The meeting was called so that ideas and suggestions
for point release improvements could be captured, while they were all
still fresh in our minds.  Many thanks to those who were able to
participate.  :)

For those interested, the summary of the discussions has been documented
[1]. Please feel free to review and add comments or propose solutions,
the point release process page[2] will be updated based on the feedback
starting next week. 

Thanks,  Kate

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LucidLynx/10.04.3/Feedback
[2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PointReleaseProcess



-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release