[Bug 745195] Re: Tomcat6 updates depend on tomcat-user.xml
** Changed in: tomcat6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: tomcat6 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745195 Title: Tomcat6 updates depend on tomcat-user.xml -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745522] [NEW] ucf prompt on server-tasks upgrade profile
Public bug reported: On a manual upgrade from a server install (with all tasks instaleld) I get a ucf conffile prompt about /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf This is a automatically installed test machine, so the config was not modified by me manually and we should not have this prompt. The diff is - protocols = imap imaps pop3 pop3s + protocols = none and sendmail path. I attach a screenshot of the VM as well. ** Affects: dovecot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: iso-testing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745522 Title: ucf prompt on server-tasks upgrade profile -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745522] Re: ucf prompt on server-tasks upgrade profile
** Attachment added: Screenshot-QEMU.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745522/+attachment/1955814/+files/Screenshot-QEMU.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745522 Title: ucf prompt on server-tasks upgrade profile -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745522] Re: ucf prompt on server-tasks upgrade profile
** Tags added: iso-testing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745522 Title: ucf prompt on server-tasks upgrade profile -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 672177] Re: libc6 upgrade causes umount to fail on shutdown because init cannot be restarted
Some nitpicks about the patch:
- patch ordering in series
- target is {lucid,maverick}-proposed
- changelog missing bug references.
- version 2.87dsf-4ubuntu18 already exists in maverick, can't be used for
lucid-updates
- maverick debdiff doesn't apply, as it wasn't done against -updates.
I corrected these and uploaded to l/m-proposed. Unsubscribing sponsors.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672177
Title:
libc6 upgrade causes umount to fail on shutdown because init cannot be
restarted
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745599] [NEW] fails on automatic update
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Running a routine automated update and this one failed with message: E: /var/cache/apt/archives/samba-common-bin_2%3a3.4.7~dfsg- 1ubuntu3.5_i386.deb: corrupted filesystem tarfile - corrupted package archive ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: samba-common-bin 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-30.59-generic 2.6.32.29+drm33.13 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-30-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Mar 30 11:37:34 2011 ErrorMessage: corrupted filesystem tarfile - corrupted package archive RelatedPackageVersions: nautilus 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1.1 gvfs 1.6.1-0ubuntu1build1 SambaClientRegression: No SourcePackage: samba Title: package samba-common-bin 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.4 failed to install/upgrade: corrupted filesystem tarfile - corrupted package archive ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745599 Title: fails on automatic update -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745599] Re: fails on automatic update
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745599 Title: fails on automatic update -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745601] [NEW] Update whois server for .li TLD
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: whois The whois server for the .li ccTDL should be changed to whois.nic.ch: $ whois nic.li The SWITCH WHOIS Service has moved. Please use the following address: whois.nic.ch Many thanks ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: whois 5.0.0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-30.59-generic 2.6.32.29+drm33.13 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-30-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Mar 30 11:38:28 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: whois ** Affects: whois (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to whois in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745601 Title: Update whois server for .li TLD -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745601] Re: Update whois server for .li TLD
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to whois in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745601 Title: Update whois server for .li TLD -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 705395] Re: $domain is not available in libvirtxml.tmpl
** Changed in: vm-builder (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705395 Title: $domain is not available in libvirtxml.tmpl -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 669371] Re: Getting MAC corruption every first time I use ssh in some way
I can confirm this bug. The first scp between two computers (either directly connected via eth or with a switch - we tested many computers) fails with: Received disconnect from 192.168.252.2: 2: Packet corrupt ii openssh-client 1:5.3p1-3ubuntu6 ii openssh-server 1:5.3p1-3ubuntu6 Linux turing11 2.6.32-24-generic #41-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 19 01:38:40 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669371 Title: Getting MAC corruption every first time I use ssh in some way -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745642] [NEW] FTBFS in ubuntu natty
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bind9 Bind9 ftbfs in natty, the log: - https://launchpadlibrarian.net/67609395/buildlog_ubuntu- natty-i386.bind9_1%3A9.7.3.dfsg-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz Is because in Ubuntu libdb-dev depends on libdb4.8-dev and in Debian on libdb5.1-dev. With libdb5.1-dev package builds well in natty chroot. Thanks! ** Affects: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745642 Title: FTBFS in ubuntu natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745642] Re: FTBFS in ubuntu natty
** Patch added: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/745642/+attachment/1956308/+files/bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745642 Title: FTBFS in ubuntu natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745642] Re: FTBFS in ubuntu natty
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Milestone: None = ubuntu-11.04-beta-2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745642 Title: FTBFS in ubuntu natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745642] Re: FTBFS in ubuntu natty
@Hi Angel, thanks for your investigation into this. As this fixes a FTBFS, and we have a working binary in the archive... i'm going to hold off trying to get this in beta1.. As there is already a bind9 in the queue waiting for the thaw, i'll merge your debdiff into the one that is pending. Hope that is ok. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745642 Title: FTBFS in ubuntu natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745642] Re: FTBFS in ubuntu natty
Ok, perfect for me. Thanks for your review. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745642 Title: FTBFS in ubuntu natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 694953] Re: missing i386 libraries on amd64
This bug was fixed in the package ia32-libs - 20090808ubuntu11 --- ia32-libs (20090808ubuntu11) natty; urgency=low * Add libqtwebkit4 (LP: #677397) * Add ibus-gtk, libibus2 (LP: #646954) * Another manual libpng link, libpng.so.3 (LP: #707770) * Add gtk2-engines-oxygen (LP: #719568) * Add libopenvg1-mesa (LP: #693969) * Add libwbclient0, winbind (LP: #694953) * Change some libraries that are now just symlink packages (should fix Flash) - libnss3-1d to libnss3 - libnspr4-0d to libnspr4 -- Scott Ritchie scottritc...@ubuntu.com Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:44:49 -0700 ** Changed in: ia32-libs (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694953 Title: missing i386 libraries on amd64 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745642] Re: FTBFS in ubuntu natty
NACK on the debdiff. db4.8 is the default in Natty, not 5.1. Switching to 5.1 just happens to fix the FTBFS because 5.1 hasn't been rebuilt for multiarch support yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745642 Title: FTBFS in ubuntu natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745642] Re: FTBFS in ubuntu natty
@Angel, it seems Marc was working on this independently - and has added multiarch support. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745642 Title: FTBFS in ubuntu natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 623342] Re: ntlm_auth returns invalid NT_KEY
This bug was fixed in the package samba - 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu8.4 --- samba (2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu8.4) maverick-proposed; urgency=low * debian/patches/ntlm-auth-lp623342.patch: ntlm_auth returns an invalid response key. (LP: #623342) Patch taken from upstream (https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7568) -- Stefano Rivera stefa...@ubuntu.com Wed, 02 Mar 2011 22:38:19 +0100 ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623342 Title: ntlm_auth returns invalid NT_KEY -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745642] Re: FTBFS in ubuntu natty
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745642 Title: FTBFS in ubuntu natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 735072] Re: The hostname proposed by installer is too long for file sharing to work correctly.
I'm moving this to Samba, after conferring with Steve Langasek. The samba package should detect the case where the hostname is longer than the limit set by NetBIOS and truncate it for its own configuration. ** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735072 Title: The hostname proposed by installer is too long for file sharing to work correctly. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 672177] Re: libc6 upgrade causes umount to fail on shutdown because init cannot be restarted
Accepted sysvinit into lucid-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed ** Tags removed: verification-done ** Tags added: verification-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672177 Title: libc6 upgrade causes umount to fail on shutdown because init cannot be restarted -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745642] Re: FTBFS in ubuntu natty
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745642 Title: FTBFS in ubuntu natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745642] Re: FTBFS in ubuntu natty
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745642 Title: FTBFS in ubuntu natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745930] [NEW] cloud-init timeout waiting for metadata service on EC2
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cloud-init In testing for natty beta-1, we hit a timeout waiting for the metadata service. This would occur when the 'cloud-init' ran, meaning that there was a network interface up. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: cloud-init 0.6.1-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: User Name 2.6.38-7.39-virtual 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-virtual x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Mar 30 17:56:22 2011 Ec2AMI: ami-bb3261fe Ec2AMIManifest: ubuntu-images-testing-us-west-1/ubuntu-natty-daily-amd64-server-20110329.manifest.xml Ec2AvailabilityZone: us-west-1c Ec2InstanceType: m1.large Ec2Kernel: aki-9ba0f1de Ec2Ramdisk: unavailable ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: cloud-init UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: cloud-init (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug ec2-images iso-testing natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745930 Title: cloud-init timeout waiting for metadata service on EC2 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745930] Re: cloud-init timeout waiting for metadata service on EC2
** Attachment added: console log of timeout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745930/+attachment/1957169/+files/console-metadata-timeout.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745930 Title: cloud-init timeout waiting for metadata service on EC2 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745930] Re: cloud-init timeout waiting for metadata service on EC2
** Tags added: iso-testing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745930 Title: cloud-init timeout waiting for metadata service on EC2 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745930] Re: cloud-init timeout waiting for metadata service on EC2
Scott, Was networking up at that stage; and was it possible to connect to it externally? Have you only seen this once? Thanks. ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745930 Title: cloud-init timeout waiting for metadata service on EC2 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745930] Re: cloud-init timeout waiting for metadata service on EC2
** Description changed: Binary package hint: cloud-init In testing for natty beta-1, we hit a timeout waiting for the metadata service. This would occur when the 'cloud-init' ran, meaning that there was a network interface up. + + This occurred on m1.large in us-west-1. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: cloud-init 0.6.1-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: User Name 2.6.38-7.39-virtual 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-virtual x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Mar 30 17:56:22 2011 Ec2AMI: ami-bb3261fe Ec2AMIManifest: ubuntu-images-testing-us-west-1/ubuntu-natty-daily-amd64-server-20110329.manifest.xml Ec2AvailabilityZone: us-west-1c Ec2InstanceType: m1.large Ec2Kernel: aki-9ba0f1de Ec2Ramdisk: unavailable ProcEnviron: - PATH=(custom, user) - LANG=en_US.UTF-8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + PATH=(custom, user) + LANG=en_US.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: cloud-init UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745930 Title: cloud-init timeout waiting for metadata service on EC2 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745946] [NEW] cloud-final job did not run
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cloud-init In natty beta-1 testing, we had 2 occurrences where it appears the upstart job cloud-final did not run after 15 minutes of waiting. This occurred once on eu-west-1 and ap-southeast-1. both were m1.small (i386). I will attach the console output of each. Note, that in that console output, the '[]' is from the 'timezone' cloud-config plugin. This gives us info that cloud-init-config had gotten past the 'apt-update-upgrade' plugin. cloud-config upstart job has: start on (filesystem and started rsyslog) cloud-config-final upstart job has: start on (stopped rc RUNLEVEL=[2345] and stopped cloud-config) [1] http://jenkins.qa.ubuntu-uk.org/view/natty-ec2/job/natty_ec2_eu-west-1_all-zones/2/artifact/eu-west-1b/i386/m1.small/instance-store/i-61c41d17/3c839fcb-ba33-4017-9a5c-ed33f5a7a532-timeout.console.txt/*view*/ [2] http://jenkins.qa.ubuntu-uk.org/view/natty-ec2/job/natty_ec2_ap-southeast-1_multi-part-ud/2/artifact/None/i386/m1.small/instance-store/i-1318d146/bd75f3a3-e373-42ce-af7d-6d5f4f45d53a-timeout.console.txt/*view*/ ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: cloud-init 0.6.1-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: User Name 2.6.38-7.39-virtual 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-virtual i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Mar 30 18:27:30 2011 Ec2AMI: ami-183b424a Ec2AMIManifest: ubuntu-images-testing-ap-southeast-1/ubuntu-natty-daily-i386-server-20110329.manifest.xml Ec2AvailabilityZone: ap-southeast-1b Ec2InstanceType: m1.small Ec2Kernel: aki-13d5aa41 Ec2Ramdisk: unavailable ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: cloud-init UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: cloud-init (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug ec2-images i386 iso-testing natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745946 Title: cloud-final job did not run -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745946] Re: cloud-final job did not run
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745946 Title: cloud-final job did not run -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745946] Re: cloud-final job did not run
** Attachment added: console output from eu-west-1 instance https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/745946/+attachment/1957226/+files/console-no-cloud-final-1.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745946 Title: cloud-final job did not run -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745946] Re: cloud-final job did not run
** Attachment added: console log from ap-southeast-1 instance https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/745946/+attachment/1957227/+files/console-no-cloud-final-2.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745946 Title: cloud-final job did not run -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745946] Re: cloud-final job did not run
** Tags added: iso-testing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745946 Title: cloud-final job did not run -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745946] Re: cloud-final job did not run
it would seem to me that the most likely cause for cloud-final not running would be something blocked in sysvinit scripts. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745946 Title: cloud-final job did not run -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745930] Re: cloud-init timeout waiting for metadata service on EC2
I had seen this recently on a lucid instance, that caused a publish failure from the daily build scripts. That occurred on a m1.large of: us-west-1 ami-f5bfefb0 canonical ebs/ubuntu-lucid-10.04-amd64-server-20110201.1 ** Attachment added: console log of lucid instance with no metadata service https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/745930/+attachment/1957268/+files/lucid-amd64-no-metadata-console.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745930 Title: cloud-init timeout waiting for metadata service on EC2 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745930] Re: cloud-init timeout waiting for metadata service on EC2
This only occurred once in todays beta-1 testing. I have seen it on very rare occasion, as noted above. I started digging a bit through my build logs. The daily build process launches an m1.large instance in each region to facilitate populating EBS root instances. On 2011-03-03, I updated the utility instances that we use to the latest lucid refreshed version (ebs/ubuntu- lucid-10.04-amd64-server-20110201.1), so this first info represents data only from that date. - 66 build logs (17 failed for one reason or another) - 298 instances launched from 2011-03-03 to 2011-03-30. - 9 of 298 instances could not be reached via ssh - 3 of those 9 instances were due to timeout on metadata service these were: 2011-03-26 us-west-1 maverick-desktop-uec-20110326 2011-03-28 us-west-1 natty-server-uec-20110328 2011-03-29 us-west-1 lucid-server-uec-20110329 So, 298 instances launched, 3 failures on metadata service. All of those in us-west-1 and occurred in the last 5 days. Going back further, though all the logs I have since ~ 2010-03-16 - 704 build logs - 2620 instances launched - 28 failed to have elastic IP associated and be reached via ssh. - 4 TOTAL have messages in console suggesting time out on metadata service 2011-03-01 us-east-1 lucid-server-uec-20110301 2011-03-26 us-west-1 maverick-desktop-uec-20110326 2011-03-28 us-west-1 natty-server-uec-20110328 2011-03-29 us-west-1 lucid-server-uec-20110329 ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745930 Title: cloud-init timeout waiting for metadata service on EC2 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 672177] Re: libc6 upgrade causes umount to fail on shutdown because init cannot be restarted
Accepted sysvinit into maverick-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672177 Title: libc6 upgrade causes umount to fail on shutdown because init cannot be restarted -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 746052] [NEW] rpcclient deldriver does not remove drivers from all architectures
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Hi, rpcclient-bugfix-patch from https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7880 was at least not yet applied for maverick 3.5.4 ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746052 Title: rpcclient deldriver does not remove drivers from all architectures -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 729288] Re: squid failed to restart after update to squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.2
jdiasn, This is an issue with your configuration file. You'll need to read squid's manual (there is a lot of help in the squid.conf itself) to know how its supposed to work. The error message says that on line 176 there's an error, so try fixing that line. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729288 Title: squid failed to restart after update to squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.2 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 717166] Re: Broken with v4 isc-dhcp-server in Natty
All, I think I've found the problem all! So, looking at: bzr branch lp:ubuntu/isc-dhcp 1.) the patch I've supplied is being placed at the end of the '00list' file in debian/patches. not a problem normally i suspect, however: 2.) the patch is not present in the actual code that is being used when I try to build a package using 'bzr bd'. the reason for this is: 3.) in debian/rules file, there is a line: dpatch deapply-until dhcp-4.1.0-ldap-code which removes the patch since it is listed after 'dhcp-4.1.0-ldap-code' in '00list'. The fix is: 4.) put the 'multi-ip-addr-per-if' list right after the 'dhclient-more-debug' line in '00list' and rebuild. I just went through this process on my natty box, installed the resulting isc-dhcp-server deb, and ran an instance or two through eucalyptus without problem. I think thats probably it (!) thanks all -dan -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717166 Title: Broken with v4 isc-dhcp-server in Natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 644481] Re: 95-kpartx.rules uses invalid -Q argument to modprobe(8)
nominating for lucid and maverick as per bug 737027 which reports actual breakage as a result. ** Also affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644481 Title: 95-kpartx.rules uses invalid -Q argument to modprobe(8) -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 705395] Re: $domain is not available in libvirtxml.tmpl
** Changed in: vm-builder (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: vm-builder (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705395 Title: $domain is not available in libvirtxml.tmpl -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 561750] Re: squid starts and stops immediately (after upgrade from karmic to lucid)
D J, I would agree with you that -D should be in the default args for squid. I'm not sure why it was removed, but this counts as a regression as in karmic -D would allow squid to start without a valid network connection. Marking as regression-release, and changing back to Triaged, as I don't feel that the bug is actually fixed completely by changing restart to reload. We also need to add -D back into the default squid arguments. ** Tags added: regression-release ** Changed in: squid (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Triaged ** Changed in: squid (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: Fix Released = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561750 Title: squid starts and stops immediately (after upgrade from karmic to lucid) -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 743858] Re: sshd not appending to /var/log/btmp
/var/log/auth.log shows bad login attempts and I'd actually never heard of lastb, but confirmed that in natty btmp is not updated with bad login attempts from ssh. ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743858 Title: sshd not appending to /var/log/btmp -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 744371] Re: PHP5-FPM doesn't always restart on 10.10
I can't reproduce this, but then I don't have any sort of load on the service... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744371 Title: PHP5-FPM doesn't always restart on 10.10 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 743858] Re: sshd not appending to /var/log/btmp
This is actually not a bug. As of openssh (1:4.1p1-5), to close Debian bug #314956, btmp logging was turned off. If you want that re-enabled, please open a Debian bug. ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743858 Title: sshd not appending to /var/log/btmp -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 744371] Re: PHP5-FPM doesn't always restart on 10.10
I note that the current debian unstable package in effect does the same thing, through its use of do_start which calls start-stop-daemon with the --retry option. Can anyone confirm they have seen this bug? I think it is probably a good idea to follow the bug submitter's proposal anyway, but am afraid that without confirmation we wont' be able to get SRU approval. ** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744371 Title: PHP5-FPM doesn't always restart on 10.10 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 743858] Re: sshd not appending to /var/log/btmp
Well, I was the one who turned that off, but I think we should keep this bug open because the situation has changed. /var/log/btmp was mode 0664 in Debian when I made that change. Now, in Ubuntu (and possibly in Debian, I haven't checked), it's mode 0660. This suggests to me that we could re-enable the feature and just check for non-world-readability. status triaged ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: Won't Fix = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743858 Title: sshd not appending to /var/log/btmp -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745073] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.4 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 1
Thanks for reporting this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Did you have a pre-existing apache configuration? Can you send the results of 'grep apache /var/log/daemon.log'? ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745073 Title: package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.4 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 737027] Re: kpartx udev rule is broken
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737027 Title: kpartx udev rule is broken -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745930] Re: cloud-init timeout waiting for metadata service on EC2
In my experience in 2008-2009, just because networking is up on an EC2
instance does not mean that 169.254.169.254 is going to accept
connections and requests for meta-data and user-data. You need to wait
for this to become available. I had code to do this in Ubuntu AMIs I
built back then.
perl -MIO::Socket::INET -e 'until(new
IO::Socket::INET(169.254.169.254:80)){sleep 1}'
I used to think I was waiting for networking to come up, but it became
clear that the meta-data service was not listening even some times when
networking was working and I had a local IP address on the instance.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745930
Title:
cloud-init timeout waiting for metadata service on EC2
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 742748] Re: package backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Thanks for submitting this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Based on the error message, it sounds like libsocket6-perl, which is in the build-depends, needs to also be in the package dependencies. Assigning this to Chuck as I suspect he'll be able to give an immediate yes/no. ** Changed in: backuppc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: backuppc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Chuck Short (zulcss) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742748 Title: package backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 742748] Re: package backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
The relevant except from DpkgTerminalLog.gz is: * Starting backuppc... [80G Can't locate Socket6.pm in @INC -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742748 Title: package backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 705395] Re: $domain is not available in libvirtxml.tmpl
Thanks for the info, but please attach the complete files (replacing any passwords with XXX) and give the full command line. Your vm.cfg has 'templates = ../vmbuilder' - what is in that directory? ** Changed in: vm-builder (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Incomplete ** Changed in: vm-builder (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium = Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705395 Title: $domain is not available in libvirtxml.tmpl -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 744371] Re: PHP5-FPM doesn't always restart on 10.10
Ah, I see - this is still the case in natty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744371 Title: PHP5-FPM doesn't always restart on 10.10 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745930] Re: cloud-init timeout waiting for metadata service on EC2
On second glance, cloud-init may actually be retrying the connection and the problem is that sometimes it takes longer than the current number of retries. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745930 Title: cloud-init timeout waiting for metadata service on EC2 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745599] Re: fails on automatic update
Thanks for reporting this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. The error messages claim that the package file is corrupt. Can you please try to clean the cache and re-try the upgrade? Clean the cache with apt-cache clean and then re-try the update with apt-get dist-upgrade ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745599 Title: fails on automatic update -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 742307] Re: Winbindd 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.5 panic affter run cron daily
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 736757 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736757 Thanks for reporting this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Certainly does look like the same stack trace. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 736757 PANIC (pid 18442): internal error in winbindd * You can subscribe to bug 736757 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/736757/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742307 Title: Winbindd 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.5 panic affter run cron daily -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 736757] Re: PANIC (pid 18442): internal error in winbindd
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736757 Title: PANIC (pid 18442): internal error in winbindd -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 745930] Re: cloud-init timeout waiting for metadata service on EC2
Well, if you lok at the attached console logs, you can see that cloud- init is retrying. In lucid, we retried 100 times with a increasing back off, resulting in 17 minutes or so of trying. The build scripts gave up after 5 minutes. In natty (both to reduce the pain if cloud-init was installed outside of EC2, and because i had extreme amounts of data -- 2000+ instances that waiting did not help), I reduced that timeout significantly, but made it configurable in /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg. From the console logs attached: -- lucid -- cloud-init running: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:14:09 +. up 10.57 seconds waiting for metadata service at http://169.254.169.254/2009-04-04/meta-data/instance-id 10:14:11 [ 1/100]: url error [timed out] ... 10:16:56 [31/100]: url error [timed out] -- natty -- cloud-init start running: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:01:16 +. up 10.08 seconds 2011-03-30 17:01:18,555 - DataSourceEc2.py[WARNING]: waiting for metadata service at http://169.254.169.254/2009-04-04/meta-data/instance-id 2011-03-30 17:01:18,555 - DataSourceEc2.py[WARNING]: 17:01:18 [ 1/30]: url error [timed out] ... 011-03-30 17:03:55,735 - DataSourceEc2.py[WARNING]: 17:03:55 [30/30]: url error [timed out] 2011-03-30 17:04:01,742 - DataSourceEc2.py[CRITICAL]: giving up on md after 165 seconds So, at the point at which the build publishing scripts gave up, cloud-init had been re-trying (after network had already come up) for 2 minutes and 35 seconds. In the natty test, it gave up after 2 minutes 45 seconds of trying. If the metadata service isn't up 3 minutes after the instance is booted, then there is a bug in the platform, expecting an instance to wait 3 minutes is not acceptable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745930 Title: cloud-init timeout waiting for metadata service on EC2 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 576501] Re: vmbuilder doesn't recognize --ec2 flag
** Changed in: vm-builder (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: vm-builder (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576501 Title: vmbuilder doesn't recognize --ec2 flag -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 746052] Re: rpcclient deldriver does not remove drivers from all architectures
created a package including the patch in my ppa at https://launchpad.net/~flosoft/+archive/ppa now it works like a charm. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746052 Title: rpcclient deldriver does not remove drivers from all architectures -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
problem in making applications accessible after a shutdown of server for 2 months
Hi all, one of my server was shutdown for 2 months and today only it has been switched on. Here are the links http://openitup.in http://software.openitup.in http://social.openitup.in http://research.openitup.in When we powered on the machine the virtual machines on top of it are running but they are not accessible from internet. Every thing 2 months back before shutting down was running.This is a reverse proxy setup and I do not see the requests reaching the Dom0 itself in Apache log. What can be primary reason for this and what should I follow to trace it? -- Tapas http://mightydreams.blogspot.com -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: problem in making applications accessible after a shutdown of server for 2 months
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Tapas Mishra mightydre...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, one of my server was shutdown for 2 months and today only it has been switched on. Here are the links http://openitup.in http://software.openitup.in http://social.openitup.in http://research.openitup.in When we powered on the machine the virtual machines on top of it are running but they are not accessible from internet. Every thing 2 months back before shutting down was running.This is a reverse proxy setup and I do not see the requests reaching the Dom0 itself in Apache log. What can be primary reason for this and what should I follow to trace it? Ok after further digging this problem I see apache is not able to start on the machine in question for some unknown reason I do not see apache pid in ps out put so now what can be done for this? -- -- Tapas -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: problem in making applications accessible after a shutdown of server for 2 months
Hi On Wednesday 30 March 2011 12:16:06 Tapas Mishra wrote: Ok after further digging this problem I see apache is not able to start on the machine in question for some unknown reason I do not see apache pid in ps out put so now what can be done for this? As always, look into the log files or start the daemon in stand-alone mode, i.e. not forking and with a lot of debugging output. Logfiles: /var/log/apache/* /var/log/daemon.log /var/log/syslog ... Carsten -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: problem in making applications accessible after a shutdown of server for 2 months
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Carsten Aulbert carsten.aulb...@aei.mpg.de wrote: Hi On Wednesday 30 March 2011 12:16:06 Tapas Mishra wrote: Ok after further digging this problem I see apache is not able to start on the machine in question for some unknown reason I do not see apache pid in ps out put so now what can be done for this? As always, look into the log files or start the daemon in stand-alone mode, i.e. not forking and with a lot of debugging output. Logfiles: /var/log/apache/* /var/log/daemon.log /var/log/syslog ... daemon.log http://pastebin.com/w1XMhNHL syslog http://pastebin.com/RdN6bjUm /var/log/apt/term.log.1.gz http://pastebin.com/cGi1a3BM /var/log/apt/term.log.2.gz http://pastebin.com/riYcXDFY /var/log/apt/term.log http://pastebin.com/1YicC1Cv /var/log/apt/history.log.2.gz http://pastebin.com/hZFib5Xh /var/log/apt/history.log.1.gz http://pastebin.com/yE3XK222 /var/log/apt/history.log http://pastebin.com/XgKekqsg the entries from 30th march on both the links are the ones which some one might be willing to look. My problem is solved as I mentioned in my previous message that there were 2 extra files with name apache present in /etc/init.d directory and using one of them was what had worked,but I want to investigate this issue further as why did I needed to do this ? What was the reason that another file apache2.2. was present in /etc/init.d and using that had worked and not /etc/init.d/apache2 . My guess is some update might have over written (but I am not having any facts to support my argument) let me know what do I investigate ?Or some one can point to some thing by looking at any other log even I will post. Because this over writing or creation of files did not happened in the virtual machines which were also lucid servers on this machine where I reported this problem. -- Tapas -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: problem in making applications accessible after a shutdown of server for 2 months
Hi not /var/log/apt, but /var/log/apache2 (!) carsten -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: problem in making applications accessible after a shutdown of server for 2 months
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Carsten Aulbert carsten.aulb...@aei.mpg.de wrote: Hi not /var/log/apt, but /var/log/apache2 (!) carsten Hmm since apache was not able to start as daemon so the requests never reached my web server. Which I had verified in Apache log as I checked openitup.in I did not saw any request being logged in /var/log/apache2 access.log or error.log hence I had pasted the /var/log/apt/* how ever there are 3-4 lines on this server in question which were repetition of following PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/lib/php5/20090626/pdo_mysql.so' - /usr/lib/php5/20090626/pdo_mysql.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0 I am not using any mysql on this machine so this line should not be present or be a reason for the problem (correct me if I am wrong) I also checked the daemon.log http://pastebin.com/c64Vhk4u could not find any thing suspicious for creation of a different version of /etc/init.d/apache to /etc/init.d/apache2.2 So I had pasted the apt logs. -- Tapas -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Server Boot
Quoting Scott Kitterman (ubu...@kitterman.com): There was a lot of discussion around improving the server boot experience before the UDS-M. A number of people expressed interest in seeing more useful diagnostic information during boot. Others expressed concerns with boot reliability on the more complex hardware typically found in servers. How are we doing on this? Personally, I can't remember the last time I rebooted a server and it wasn't via SSH and the hardware I use is the sort there were problems with. Are these still issues for the Ubuntu Server community? Scott K I think right now these issues are oveshadowed by the fact that a great deal of server software is not yet upstartified. I think that needs to be addressed for O. signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
[Oneiric-Topic] Package Updates
Hi, For Oneiric I would like the following packages updated: dovecot 1.2.x - 2.x mysql 5.1 - 5.5 The reasoning for this update in the long run it will be easier to maintain for a LTS and more users want to use both mysql 5.5 and dovecot2. Regards chuck -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
[Oneiric-Topic] Seed Review
Hi, I would like to propose that we do another server seed review for Oneiric. I think it would be a good idea to see we are offering the best that we can. Regards chuck -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Package Updates
Isn't it time to use mariadb instead of mysql? On 03/30/2011 10:13 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 09:59:58 AM Chuck Short wrote: Hi, For Oneiric I would like the following packages updated: dovecot 1.2.x - 2.x mysql 5.1 - 5.5 The reasoning for this update in the long run it will be easier to maintain for a LTS and more users want to use both mysql 5.5 and dovecot2. Regards chuck Since mysql is used by desktop applications we'll need to make sure that's supported there as well. We don't want to get into another mess like we did with having to support 5.0 and 5.1 (to some degree) in Main. I'm very interested in postgresql-9.0, but that should just happen since it's in Debian already and postgresql supports parallel installation of multiple versions. The only question is if it should be the version in Main starting in O or P. I think there are some packaging complications if the highest version in the archive isn't the one in Main (pitti would know for sure). Scott K -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
[Oneiric-Topic] lxc development
Some basic lxc container improvements: ∘ templates for other distros (fedora, opensles, gentoo) ∘ quick container cloning with snapshotting for lvm, btrfs, and aufs/unionfs (based on ppa:serge-hallyn/lxc-natty work) ∘ sandbox template using current user namespace . limited use, but useful for locking child task such that it can only talk to us over pipes. ∘ per container syslog . Lack of this has prevented me from using containers for some bug investigations. ∘ proc virtualization ∘ container reboot and shutdown ∘ custom per-container firewall rules ∘ lsm integration signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Package Updates
On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 10:16:14 AM Ralph Janke wrote: Top posting fixed. On 03/30/2011 10:13 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 09:59:58 AM Chuck Short wrote: Hi, For Oneiric I would like the following packages updated: dovecot 1.2.x - 2.x mysql 5.1 - 5.5 The reasoning for this update in the long run it will be easier to maintain for a LTS and more users want to use both mysql 5.5 and dovecot2. Regards chuck Since mysql is used by desktop applications we'll need to make sure that's supported there as well. We don't want to get into another mess like we did with having to support 5.0 and 5.1 (to some degree) in Main. I'm very interested in postgresql-9.0, but that should just happen since it's in Debian already and postgresql supports parallel installation of multiple versions. The only question is if it should be the version in Main starting in O or P. I think there are some packaging complications if the highest version in the archive isn't the one in Main (pitti would know for sure). Isn't it time to use mariadb instead of mysql? There's more than one fork out there. It would probably be useful to have a discussion about what mysql variant will be most supportable for LTS and move towards that in the oneiric timeframe. I think that deserves a spec of it's own. Scott K -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
[Oneiric-Topic] Community and family intranets
This one isn't particularly well thought out, but is based on the idea of freedombox. The question is what can we do to help enable families and communities to do things like facebook and gmail just as easily, but using their own infrastructure. So we would want users to easily be able to share . encrypted backups . of small amounts of vital data, like bank statements and geneology research. Fortunately most people won't want their own network links saturated so their son can back up their torrents. . pictures . email . chat (i.e. just a small irc partyline) -serge signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
[Oneiric-Topic] Revisit Xen support
Hi, In the past Xen support in Ubuntu as a host has been difficult for a variety of reasons most notably no upstream kernel support. Now that dom0 should be coming into the vanilla kernel soon. I think its time to revisit supporting Xen as a hypervisor as well. Regards chuck -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
[Oneiric-Topic] radvd flexibility
I know little about this, but it's been suggested that there may be problems with radvd's flexibility. This originaly was brought up with respect to libvirt, but AIUI libvirt's ipv6 support has worked around this. So I don't know if the topic is still needed or not. -serge signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
[Oneiric-Topic] user namespaces
The natty cycle was quite productive in terms of user namespace work. The overall development plan is at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UserNamespace. For the Oneiric cycle I think a reasonable goal is to complete the conversion of all capable() and uid comparisons to do appropriate user namespace comparisons, and the ability for a full filesystem to be owned by a user namespace. If things go well, we may also start uid mapping - which would just about complete the kernel part of user namespace. -serge signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Revisit Xen support
On 11-03-30 10:27 AM, Chuck Short wrote: Hi, In the past Xen support in Ubuntu as a host has been difficult for a variety of reasons most notably no upstream kernel support. Now that dom0 should be coming into the vanilla kernel soon. I think its time to revisit supporting Xen as a hypervisor as well. I do not have much to contribute to the technical discussion around Xen dom0. All I can say is that, in my work with corporate end-users, it's a FAQ; seems like Xen is entrenched in a lot of organisations. Maintaining and supporting a dom0 kernel would make the life of these organisations much easier, and even open new opportunities for Ubuntu in the enterprises. -- Etienne Goyer Technical Account Manager - Canonical Ltd Ubuntu Certified Instructor -LPIC-3 ~= Ubuntu: Linux for Human Beings =~ -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
[Oneiric-Topic] vlan on cd
ivoks mentioned during a server team meeting that he'd like to see vlan on the cd, and installed by default. signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Revisit Xen support
+1 for xen dom0 support! On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Chuck Short chuck.sh...@canonical.com wrote: Hi, In the past Xen support in Ubuntu as a host has been difficult for a variety of reasons most notably no upstream kernel support. Now that dom0 should be coming into the vanilla kernel soon. I think its time to revisit supporting Xen as a hypervisor as well. Regards chuck -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
[Oneiric-Topic] SRU Process
Hi, I do not have the statistics in front of me, but I believe most of users are using LTS releases of Ubuntu. The policy of cherrypicking fixes from the development releases does not scale in my opinon. We should offer PPAs for users who want to use a new version of for example Apache. Or go through the list of packages we support and see if we can get it to qualify as a micro release update. Regards chuck -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Package Updates
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote: On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 10:16:14 AM Ralph Janke wrote: Top posting fixed. On 03/30/2011 10:13 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 09:59:58 AM Chuck Short wrote: Hi, For Oneiric I would like the following packages updated: dovecot 1.2.x - 2.x mysql 5.1 - 5.5 The reasoning for this update in the long run it will be easier to maintain for a LTS and more users want to use both mysql 5.5 and dovecot2. Regards chuck Since mysql is used by desktop applications we'll need to make sure that's supported there as well. We don't want to get into another mess like we did with having to support 5.0 and 5.1 (to some degree) in Main. I'm very interested in postgresql-9.0, but that should just happen since it's in Debian already and postgresql supports parallel installation of multiple versions. The only question is if it should be the version in Main starting in O or P. I think there are some packaging complications if the highest version in the archive isn't the one in Main (pitti would know for sure). Isn't it time to use mariadb instead of mysql? There's more than one fork out there. It would probably be useful to have a discussion about what mysql variant will be most supportable for LTS and move towards that in the oneiric timeframe. I think that deserves a spec of it's own. Scott K I agree, if the community is going to want to move away from mysql to one of the variants, the time is now to discuss which one would be best. -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Server Boot
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Serge E. Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com wrote: Quoting Scott Kitterman (ubu...@kitterman.com): There was a lot of discussion around improving the server boot experience before the UDS-M. A number of people expressed interest in seeing more useful diagnostic information during boot. Others expressed concerns with boot reliability on the more complex hardware typically found in servers. How are we doing on this? Personally, I can't remember the last time I rebooted a server and it wasn't via SSH and the hardware I use is the sort there were problems with. Are these still issues for the Ubuntu Server community? Scott K I think right now these issues are oveshadowed by the fact that a great deal of server software is not yet upstartified. I think that needs to be addressed for O. I agree, it can get confusing when for example restarting some services, I do restart, and for others I have to do the older /etc/init.d/service restart. I miss the days when it was all uniform :) Even if there was at the least, some kind of wrapper, so when I did restart servicexyz, if that service wasn't upstartified, it just ran the init script restart for me... Doug -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNkyd+AAoJEHmllQITXQdFWxEH/R8DRhQf0sVMMHoowLKGoCDB jslC2h8W5gAhu1s3HFO7CZy/LDvLsMoUEks4uGs3FNxx9luDSewtTEXysSciV3De XgB4FEr07oj7jXaPumUM2AiodOQbyCEKNwAlylNrPJlPshC11oB90JyJZ9unaZ2s 8QP5F2NhIYc4VcvstKfyuoQD6X8cL+zTRi5w7rMVPojMwmD2GApKDrHyAHN48daW l6znlfiWx5QdFMPLzhGPZMBjDaNXQn9Isc51wmEQIYYoAgUWXdMHSQXYAdbFY+L/ 7f+E7SiF9olAOl/GJ/wXYk9azmoYMyoe9eLYNGZ6yH8JF5l/vS1XhYkPph+Cgys= =lJvb -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
[Oneiric-Topic] Puppet Integration
Hi, Ubuntu server should be offering better Puppet integration. This includes the following: * Making it really easy to deploy a puppet master server. * Possible d-i integration * Pre-canned puppet reciepes Regards chuck -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
[Oneiric-Topic] Further PowerNap Improvements
Hi All, During the Natty release cycle, PowerNap was improved in two main aspects: - Monitoring enhancements, adding the capability to monitor different components such as Input, Network Activity and Application activity to correctly determine the idled state of the machine. - New Power Saving method, consisting on using pm-powersave and providing a few additional scripts. However, now. I'd like to see a Client/Server implementation approach of PowerNap on which things occur as follows: - Client auto-registration to a PowerNap server - PowerNap server tracking the status of a PowerNap client in the network. - PowerNap server being able to schedule wakeups-sleeps for any of the clients. - PowerNap server being able to monitor network to auto wakeup monitored machines (i.e. ARP Monitor) - API like base implementation to be able to integrate it to other applications, (i.e. Landscape.) Cheers, -- Andres Rodriguez (RoAkSoAx) Ubuntu Server Developer Systems Engineer -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Server Boot
Quoting Douglas Stanley (douglas.m.stan...@gmail.com): On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Serge E. Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com wrote: Quoting Scott Kitterman (ubu...@kitterman.com): There was a lot of discussion around improving the server boot experience before the UDS-M. A number of people expressed interest in seeing more useful diagnostic information during boot. Others expressed concerns with boot reliability on the more complex hardware typically found in servers. How are we doing on this? Personally, I can't remember the last time I rebooted a server and it wasn't via SSH and the hardware I use is the sort there were problems with. Are these still issues for the Ubuntu Server community? Scott K I think right now these issues are oveshadowed by the fact that a great deal of server software is not yet upstartified. I think that needs to be addressed for O. I agree, it can get confusing when for example restarting some services, I do restart, and for others I have to do the older /etc/init.d/service restart. I miss the days when it was all uniform :) There's that, but the more serious issue is with startup dependencies. thanks, -serge signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
[Oneiric-Topic] Nagios
Hi, I think we should re-evaluate if nagios is the monitoring solution we want to support and if it easy make really really easy to deploy. chuck -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] SRU Process
On 11-03-30 10:40 AM, Chuck Short wrote: I do not have the statistics in front of me, but I believe most of users are using LTS releases of Ubuntu. The policy of cherrypicking fixes from the development releases does not scale in my opinon. We should offer PPAs for users who want to use a new version of for example Apache. Or go through the list of packages we support and see if we can get it to qualify as a micro release update. Agreed. Some mechanism to modularize the distribution is in order. From an end-user perspective, it does no make any sense that you need to upgrade the OS to run a new version of Apache. I understand why we are doing this from the distribution perspective, and I know a lot of people are very attached to the way things are being done now, but it really baffles people coming to Ubuntu from other platforms at time. mdz blogged about this a while ago: http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2010/07/06/weve-packaged-all-of-the-free-software-what-now/ Decoupling certain key software from the distribution so that it does not have to be upgraded in lockstep would be a start. I would really like to discuss that at the UDS; count me in. -- Etienne Goyer Technical Account Manager - Canonical Ltd Ubuntu Certified Instructor -LPIC-3 ~= Ubuntu: Linux for Human Beings =~ -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
[Oneiric-Topic] ipv6 health check
Hi, I would like to make sure that we are okay for IPV6. This includes making sure that various daemons are ready for IPV6 and if they work properly on Ubuntu Server with IPV6 enabled. Regards chuck -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] vlan on cd
On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 10:35:43 AM Serge E. Hallyn wrote: ivoks mentioned during a server team meeting that he'd like to see vlan on the cd, and installed by default. The server CD is full. I think a lot of I'd like to add type discussions are going to be blocked on what to remove. I'd like to get 30MB back to ship clamav signatures with the package in order to decrease our delta with Debian and make upstream happy, but there's no room. I think that unless we split cloud/server as I suggested in a different topic the amount of additions we can do is very limited. Scott K -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Puppet Integration
On 11-03-30 10:53 AM, Chuck Short wrote: Ubuntu server should be offering better Puppet integration. This includes the following: * Making it really easy to deploy a puppet master server. * Possible d-i integration * Pre-canned puppet reciepes It's been an ongoing topic for while. I think we really have the opportunity to differentiate Ubuntu here. In particular, preseedable d-i integration would make Ubuntu deployment a completely hands-off operation. Again, count me in for that one! -- Etienne Goyer Technical Account Manager - Canonical Ltd Ubuntu Certified Instructor -LPIC-3 ~= Ubuntu: Linux for Human Beings =~ -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
[Oneiric-Topic] Openstack next steps
Hi, I would like to see us further Openstack into Ubuntu. This would include the following for distro: * Package the web interface * Continue packaging nova, glance, and swift snapshots. * Better deployment of openstack on deployment. * Maybe a live CD-ROM. This would I like to see from upstream: * ebsroot * Exposing statistics for instances. chuck -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Server Boot
On 03/30/2011 10:49 AM, Douglas Stanley wrote: On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Serge E. Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com wrote: Quoting Scott Kitterman (ubu...@kitterman.com): There was a lot of discussion around improving the server boot experience before the UDS-M. A number of people expressed interest in seeing more useful diagnostic information during boot. Others expressed concerns with boot reliability on the more complex hardware typically found in servers. How are we doing on this? Personally, I can't remember the last time I rebooted a server and it wasn't via SSH and the hardware I use is the sort there were problems with. Are these still issues for the Ubuntu Server community? Scott K I think right now these issues are oveshadowed by the fact that a great deal of server software is not yet upstartified. I think that needs to be addressed for O. I agree, it can get confusing when for example restarting some services, I do restart, and for others I have to do the older /etc/init.d/service restart. I miss the days when it was all uniform :) Even if there was at the least, some kind of wrapper, so when I did restart servicexyz, if that service wasn't upstartified, it just ran the init script restart for me... Doug +1 to this -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
[Oneiric-Topic] Improvements to cobbler
Hi, I would like to see more puppet intergration with cobbler. That is all. Regards chuck -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] SRU Process
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote: On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 10:40:36 AM Chuck Short wrote: Hi, I do not have the statistics in front of me, but I believe most of users are using LTS releases of Ubuntu. The policy of cherrypicking fixes from the development releases does not scale in my opinon. We should offer PPAs for users who want to use a new version of for example Apache. Or go through the list of packages we support and see if we can get it to qualify as a micro release update. We can also do a lot of this through backports. We are very close to having the backports only install packages that users explicitly request from backports (just waiting on an LP change that's in progress), so it will be much safer to use going forward. Scott K This is something I've wanted for a while. I know backports exist, but they're usually pretty limited. I'd really like to see more things backported. Like the previous poster stated, there's no reason to upgrade the entire OS if all we want is say a newer apache or nginx or puppetmaster, etc. How are packages being selected for backports currently? Doug -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] ipv6 health check
On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:11:46 AM James Page wrote: On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 11:01 -0400, Chuck Short wrote: Hi, I would like to make sure that we are okay for IPV6. This includes making sure that various daemons are ready for IPV6 and if they work properly on Ubuntu Server with IPV6 enabled. Regards chuck I've triaged a few bugs where issues have been seen in pure IPv6 environments where IPv4 is completely disabled; I'm uncomfortable about whether this is really a supported configuration and should this type of configuration be covered in the health check? Even if it's not formally 'supported' we need to treat these as valid bugs as this will, over time, be an increasingly common configuration. I have one server running in a data center with native IPv6 and the only issue I ran into so far is the need to add an IPv6 localhost by hand (this should at least ben done by the installer on new installs, but I doubt it should be done for upgrades). Scott K -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Re: [Oneiric-Topic] ipv6 health check
On 11-03-30 11:01 AM, Chuck Short wrote: I would like to make sure that we are okay for IPV6. This includes making sure that various daemons are ready for IPV6 and if they work properly on Ubuntu Server with IPV6 enabled. This is something I have been working on, and that I was going to write a blueprint for. Feel free to do so yourself, though! From my notes, here are the stuff that needs some work: - d-i/netcfg support: right now, AFAIK (I have to check that), you cannot install an IPv6-only Ubuntu host. - netboot installation: PXE relies on IPv4 DHCP and TFTP. Are there any IPv6 alternatives, and do we need to do anything special to support these? (there probably aren't, sadly) - DHCPv6: I believe we are going to get this for free with ISC dhcp v4, but it's worth checking. - Network Manager: reportedly, it will work with IPv6, but it cannot be made IPv6-only. That is important in certain use-case. We need to check that. - NFS over IPv6 is currently DOA in lucid (notably, missing kernel support in some place). Not sure about the status of natty. This will need some serious testing. - What about IPv6 support in Eucalyptus and OpenStack? - It would be interesting to check that the network API of the various language interpreter we ship (Python, Perl, etc) are IPv6-ready. - In general, IPv6 will need to be integrated into our QA test-suite. Some of the above are really topics for the foundation team, I understand that. It even spills into desktop. I think IPv6 enablement has to be a cross-team effort. -- Etienne Goyer Technical Account Manager - Canonical Ltd Ubuntu Certified Instructor -LPIC-3 ~= Ubuntu: Linux for Human Beings =~ -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
