[Bug 591100] Re: autofs5 eats the cpu if you have large groups

2010-08-18 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed

-- 
autofs5 eats the cpu if you have large groups
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591100
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 570513] Re: NIS-based autofs maps don't load on startup

2010-08-18 Thread Paul Elliott
This should be fixed when bug 569757 is fixed (migration of NIS to
upstart).

-- 
NIS-based autofs maps don't load on startup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 108737] Re: [apport] ypbind crashed with SIGSEGV in test_bindings_once()

2010-08-18 Thread Paul Elliott
Both Ubuntu Edgy and Feisty are EOL (end of life) and no longer
supported. Please let us know if you come across this issue again in any
of the supported releases:

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases

** Changed in: nis (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Invalid

-- 
[apport] ypbind crashed with SIGSEGV in test_bindings_once()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108737
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619520] Re: package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.41-3ubuntu12.3 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal.

2010-08-18 Thread Steve Beattie
** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.41-3ubuntu12.3 failed to install/upgrade: Package 
is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should  reinstall it before 
attempting a removal.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619520
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.1 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619712] [NEW] keepalived vrrp race condition and fix (versions 1.1.17 and 1.2.0 but perhaps all?)

2010-08-18 Thread Arjan
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***

Public security bug reported:

Binary package hint: keepalived

Hello,

About a keepalived vrrp race condition and fix (versions 1.1.17 and 1.2.0)
and probably all other versions.

Impact: possible complete/partial datacenter disruptions due to gratious
arp/multicast floods


The situation to reproduce the race condition

The race condition got triggered in our situation with 1 cluster of 4
machines, sharing  3 (vlan) interfaces.

Reason for doing doing so, not really importand, using vrrp and redundant
cluster (2x2) for changing the default gateway, in case of a lease line
failure.


The most basic setup, and easyest way to trigger is a subset of above
-3 machines, with keepalived
-2 interfaces/machine, defined in keepalived as vrrp_instance
-1 vrrp_sync_group, with those interfaces included

some key settings:

machine1:
initial state: state BACKUP
int 1, prio 250
int 2, prio 250
machine2:
initial state: state BACKUP
int 1, prio 200
int 2, prio 200
machine3:
initial state: state MASTER
int 1, prio 150
int 2, prio 150


Machine3 is set to master, just to trigger the race condition, but in
initial state BACKUP, a connection failure (without a link down) will do the
same, which is the situation we encountered.


WARNING: below may/will cause network disruption, so be prepared.

The way to trigger, is having started keepalived on machine 1  2, where
machine 1 gently becomes a master as meant/configured.

Now, start machine3, and here it happens, as soon machine sends a single
vrrp message (as it want's to be master), machine 1  2 get's crazy(haywire), 
and
come in a race condition which will never stop, until you stop one of
machine 1 or 2. Stopping machine 3 will definitly NOT stop the race.


A sample of the relevant logging of the race:

machine 1:
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV610) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV910) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV610) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV910) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV610) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV910) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV610) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV910) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV610) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV910) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV610) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV910) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV610) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV910) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV610) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV910) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV610) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV910) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV610) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV910) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV610) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd01 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV910) Received 
lower prio advert, forcing new election


machine 2:
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd02 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV610) forcing a 
new MASTER election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd02 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Group(GROUP1) Transition to 
MASTER state
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd02 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV910) forcing a 
new MASTER election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd02 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Group(GROUP1) Transition to 
MASTER state
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd02 Keepalived_vrrp: VRRP_Instance(AMV910) forcing a 
new MASTER election
Aug 16 13:22:27 saaplsprd02 

[Bug 591286] Re: PHP Deprecated: Comments starting with '#' are deprecated in[...] on line 1 in Unknown on line 0

2010-08-18 Thread Dimitrios Symeonidis
All you gotta do is replace # with ;
This is almost qualified for a papercut!

-- 
PHP Deprecated:  Comments starting with '#' are deprecated in[...] on line 1 in 
Unknown on line 0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591286
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 618722] Re: package mysql-server-core-5.1 5 .1.41-3ubuntu12.6 failed to install/upgrade: s'h a produït un error en escriure a «standard ou tput»: No such file or directory

2010-08-18 Thread frandj
There were some other packages that gave same failure results.

-- 
package mysql-server-core-5.1 5.1.41-3ubuntu12.6 failed to install/upgrade: 
s'ha produït un error en escriure a «standard output»: No such file or 
directory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618722
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.1 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 553142] Re: gdm does not obey NIS settings for user groups

2010-08-18 Thread Jan Groenewald
User liesl is in NIS group aimsadmrw, but shed does not get permissions with 
normal
login. However after either ssh localhost or su - liesl she does have the 
necessary group
permissions.

On lucid 64bit, LDAP client for passwords, NIS client for groups, NFS/autofs 
mounted /home.
ii  nis3.17-31clients and daemons for the Network Informat

li...@muizenberg:~$ grep 192 /etc/yp.conf 
ypserver 192.168.42.2
li...@muizenberg:~$ grep nis /etc/nsswitch.conf 
group:  compat nis
netgroup:   nis
li...@muizenberg:~$ grep liesl /etc/security/group.conf 
* ;:0 ;liesl ;Al-2400 ;aimsadmr,aimsadmrw
li...@muizenberg:~$ grep group /etc/pam.d/*|grep -v \#
/etc/pam.d/common-auth:authoptionalpam_group.so
/etc/pam.d/gdm:authsufficient  pam_succeed_if.so user ingroup 
nopasswdlogin
/etc/pam.d/gdm:auth optional pam_group.so
/etc/pam.d/login:auth   optional   pam_group.so
li...@muizenberg:~$ tail -1 /etc/group
+:::
li...@muizenberg:~$ ypcat group|grep aims
aimsadmr:x:20003:jan,lynne,ike,fjwh,gudrun,aeeda,barrie,liesl,bwg,asharma
aimsadrw2:x:20005:lynne,aeeda
aimsadmrw:x:20004:liesl,aeeda # -- liesl in group in question.
aimsr:x:900:jan,lynne,ike,fjwh,gudrun,aeeda,bwg,asharma

NOTE GROUP PERMISSIONS IN STRAIGHT GDM LOGIN FAILS; BUT AFTER SSH IT
WORKS; AFTER SU - USER IT WORKS!

li...@seychelles:/var/autofs/misc/home/liesl$ groups # WHY DOES IT SHOW SO MANY 
COPIES?
staff2009 adm adm cdrom cdrom floppy floppy audio audio video video plugdev 
plugdev aimsadmr aimsadmr aimsadmr aimsadmrw aimsadmrw aimsadmrw
li...@seychelles:/var/autofs/misc/home/liesl$ id
uid=1498(liesl) gid=509(staff2009) 
groups=4(adm),4(adm),24(cdrom),24(cdrom),25(floppy),25(floppy),29(audio),29(audio),44(video),44(video),46(plugdev),46(plugdev),509(staff2009),20003(aimsadmr),20003(aimsadmr),20003(aimsadmr),20004(aimsadmrw),20004(aimsadmrw),20004(aimsadmrw)
li...@seychelles:/var/autofs/misc/home/liesl$ touch 
/home/aeeda/Desktop/Visitors_Overview_2007.ods
touch: cannot touch `/home/aeeda/Desktop/Visitors_Overview_2007.ods': 
Permission denied # ARGH
li...@seychelles:/var/autofs/misc/home/liesl$ ssh li...@localhost # VIA SSH
li...@localhost's password: 
Linux seychelles 2.6.32-24-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 28 05:14:15 UTC 2010 
x86_64 GNU/Linux
Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
li...@seychelles:~$ groups 
staff2009 aimsadmr aimsadmrw
li...@seychelles:~$ id
uid=1498(liesl) gid=509(staff2009) 
groups=509(staff2009),20003(aimsadmr),20004(aimsadmrw)
li...@seychelles:~$ touch /home/aeeda/Desktop/Visitors_Overview_2007.ods # \o/
li...@seychelles:~$ logout
Connection to localhost closed.
li...@seychelles:/var/autofs/misc/home/liesl$ touch 
/home/aeeda/Desktop/Visitors_Overview_2007.ods # :\
touch: cannot touch `/home/aeeda/Desktop/Visitors_Overview_2007.ods': 
Permission denied 
li...@seychelles:/var/autofs/misc/home/liesl$ su - liesl
Password: 
li...@seychelles:~$ touch /home/aeeda/Desktop/Visitors_Overview_2007.ods # \o/
li...@seychelles:~$ 

wtf?

Probably unrelated but mentioned here for completeness.

I thought adding these were unecessary, plus they do not fix the problem:
authoptionalpam_group.so# to gdm-autologin 
session optional pam_group.so #to common-session
account optional pam_group.so # to common-account

Also, in /var/log/kern.log this is apparently a harmless error:
svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97).
can be solved by booting with kernel option ipv6.disable=1 
and that does not fix it either.

Strace and ltrace does not show much information I can recognize besides
permission denied.

Also nscd is installed but stopped for above testing.

Also the new LDAP client libs are used, libpam-ldapd and not libpam-
ldap, so nslcd is installed.

-- 
gdm does not obey NIS settings for user groups
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553142
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619769] [NEW] package samba-common 2:3. 4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvi ó el código de salida de error 10

2010-08-18 Thread Pablo Sánchez Bosch
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: samba

During package upgrade in Ubuntu 10.04 LTS

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.39-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: wl nvidia
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Aug 18 13:03:59 2010
ErrorMessage: el subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el 
código de salida de error 10
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429)
PackageArchitecture: all
RelatedPackageVersions:
 nautilus 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1.1
 gvfs 1.6.1-0ubuntu1build1
SambaClientRegression: Yes
SourcePackage: samba
Title: package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
el subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida 
de error 10

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid

-- 
package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: el 
subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de 
error 10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619769
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619769] Re: package samba-common 2:3.4. 7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: el subp roceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de error 10

2010-08-18 Thread Pablo Sánchez Bosch

** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619769/+attachment/1497608/+files/AptOrdering.txt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619769/+attachment/1497609/+files/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Df.txt
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619769/+attachment/1497610/+files/Df.txt

** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619769/+attachment/1497611/+files/Dmesg.txt

** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619769/+attachment/1497612/+files/DpkgTerminalLog.txt

** Attachment added: SambaInstalledVersions.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619769/+attachment/1497613/+files/SambaInstalledVersions.txt

-- 
package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: el 
subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de 
error 10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619769
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619773] [NEW] package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: subproces installed post-installation script gaf een foutwaarde 1 terug

2010-08-18 Thread Paul van Genderen
Private bug reported:

Binary package hint: samba

I'm not sure what went wrong, but while reporting this Apport asked me
wether I'm running a Windows file server or connecting to one. In my
situation, however, I'm not running Windows at all but I use Samba both
to share files with and to connect to other Samba servers. Occasionally
Windows clients connect to Samba as well.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-14.20~lucid2-generic 2.6.35
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-14-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Aug 18 10:40:52 2010
ErrorMessage: subproces installed post-installation script gaf een foutwaarde 1 
terug
PackageArchitecture: all
RelatedPackageVersions:
 nautilus 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1.1
 gvfs 1.6.1-0ubuntu1build1
SambaClientRegression: Yes
SourcePackage: samba
Title: package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
subproces installed post-installation script gaf een foutwaarde 1 terug

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package lucid

-- 
package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
subproces installed post-installation script gaf een foutwaarde 1 terug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619773
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619773] Re: package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: subproces installed post-installation script gaf een foutwaarde 1 terug

2010-08-18 Thread Paul van Genderen

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/619773/+attachment/1497618/+files/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Df.txt
   https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/619773/+attachment/1497619/+files/Df.txt

** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/619773/+attachment/1497620/+files/Dmesg.txt

** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/619773/+attachment/1497621/+files/DpkgTerminalLog.gz

** Attachment added: SambaInstalledVersions.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/619773/+attachment/1497622/+files/SambaInstalledVersions.txt

** Visibility changed to: Private

** Attachment removed: Dmesg.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/619773/+attachment/1497620/+files/Dmesg.txt

** Attachment removed: Df.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/619773/+attachment/1497619/+files/Df.txt

-- 
package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
subproces installed post-installation script gaf een foutwaarde 1 terug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619773
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 599342] Re: Temporary failure in name resolution

2010-08-18 Thread Robert Sander
We have removed the local hostname from /etc/hosts pointing to 127.0.1.1
or any other address in 127.0.0.0/8, we only keep 127.0.0.1 for
localhost in there. Every other name is resolved by our internal DNS.

The loop above just waits until the DNS answers and the hostname can be
resolved. Otherwise libvirtd refuses to start.

We have reasons not to resolve the hostname to a 127.0.0.0/8 address.

-- 
Temporary failure in name resolution
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599342
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 553142] Re: gdm does not obey NIS settings for user groups

2010-08-18 Thread Jan Groenewald
Just to confirm this problem is specific to lucid.
The previous desktop images were jaunty, and I have just tested
that this problem does not exist on the jaunty client!

On the jaunty install (no trailing line in /etc/group, no gdm:optional
pam_group.so  line.)

li...@senegal:~$ grep 192 /etc/yp.conf
ypserver 192.168.42.2
li...@senegal:~$ grep nis /etc/nsswitch.conf
group:  compat nis
netgroup:   nis
li...@senegal:~$ grep liesl /etc/security/group.conf
* ;:0 ;liesl ;Al-2400 ;aimsadmr,aimsadmrw
li...@senegal:~$ grep group /etc/pam.d/*|grep -v \#
/etc/pam.d/common-auth:authoptionalpam_group.so
/etc/pam.d/login:auth   optional   pam_group.so
li...@senegal:~$ grep + /etc/group
li...@senegal:~$ grep + /etc/passwd
li...@senegal:~$ ypcat group|grep aims
aimsadmr:x:20003:jan,lynne,ike,fjwh,gudrun,aeeda,barrie,liesl,bwg,asharma
aimsadrw2:x:20005:lynne,aeeda
aimsadmrw:x:20004:liesl,aeeda
aimsr:x:900:jan,lynne,ike,fjwh,gudrun,aeeda,bwg,asharma
li...@senegal:~$ i...@senegal:~$ groups
staff2009 aimsadmr aimsadmrw
li...@senegal:~$ id
uid=1498(liesl) gid=509(staff2009) 
groups=509(staff2009),20003(aimsadmr),20004(aimsadmrw)
li...@senegal:~$ touch /home/aeeda/Desktop/Visitors_Overview_2007.ods

So it is not server side.

Adding the optional pam_group.so line to /etc/pam.d/gdm (as I have on lucid) to 
the
jaunty machine did not reproduce the problem. 

It looks as if REMOVING the line auth optional pam_group.so from the lucid
client FIXES this. Is there something wrong with that syntax?

-- 
gdm does not obey NIS settings for user groups
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553142
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 553142] Re: gdm does not obey NIS settings for user groups

2010-08-18 Thread Jan Groenewald
To clarify:
It looks as if REMOVING the line auth optional pam_group.so from the lucid
client FIXES this. Is there something wrong with that syntax?

Removing the line from /etc/pam.d/gdm.

It is still in common-auth and login.

-- 
gdm does not obey NIS settings for user groups
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553142
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 599342] Re: Temporary failure in name resolution

2010-08-18 Thread Serge Hallyn
Robert:

Naturally you can use the recipe in comment #2 on your own systems.  It's
just not safe to put in the package.

Jamie, since you've been packaging libvirt-bin (and since I'm looking for
a sanity check), do you see any problems with changing the upstart script
to the one I put in comment #4?

(I guess I'll create a tree to propose in the next few minutes)

-- 
Temporary failure in name resolution
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599342
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619843] [NEW] euca-get-console-output returns one single line

2010-08-18 Thread C de-Avillez
Public bug reported:

Running 2.0~bzr1231-0ubuntu2. I tried running euca-get-console-output on
some instances, and all I got back was a single line:

ubu...@cempedak:~$ euca-get-console-output i-3BE107C9
i-3BE107C9
2010-08-18T13:16:07.961Z

ubu...@cempedak:~$ euca-get-console-output i-408E0726
i-408E0726
2010-08-18T13:16:36.14Z

ubu...@cempedak:~$ euca-get-console-output i-3E950741
VmControl: Instance i-3E950741 is not in a running state.
ubu...@cempedak:~$ euca-get-console-output i-44D3087B
i-44D3087B
2010-08-18T13:17:30.399Z

ubu...@cempedak:~$ euca-get-console-output i-49160882
i-49160882
2010-08-18T13:23:12.712Z

ubu...@cempedak:~$

** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
euca-get-console-output returns one single line
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619843
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619855] [NEW] session.gc_probablity=1 in /etc/php5/apache2/php.ini conflicts with permissions on /var/lib/php5

2010-08-18 Thread Jon Barber
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: php5

Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS
Release:10.04

php5-common:
  Installed: 5.3.2-1ubuntu4.2
  Candidate: 5.3.2-1ubuntu4.2
  Version table:
 *** 5.3.2-1ubuntu4.2 0
500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 5.3.2-1ubuntu4 0
500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages

/var/log/apache2/error.log: [Wed Aug 18 13:17:39 2010] [error] [client
192.168.0.103] PHP Notice:  session_start(): ps_files_cleanup_dir:
opendir(/var/lib/php5) failed: Permission denied (13) in /var/www/a.php
on line 1

This seems to be a regression introduced by upstream packagers.  php.ini
used to have session.gc_probability=0 with the comment This is disabled
in the Debian packages, due to the strict permissions on /var/lib/php5.
The strict permissions remain, but session.gc_probability is now
enabled.

By default there's a 0.1% chance that a call to session_start() will
trigger this, but setting session.gc_divisor=1 makes this easily
reproducible.

The problem was originally spotted by a developer colleague, who
referenced this blog entry: http://somethingemporium.com/2007/06
/obscure-error-with-php5-on-debian-ubuntu-session-phpini-garbage

** Affects: php5 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
session.gc_probablity=1 in /etc/php5/apache2/php.ini conflicts with permissions 
on /var/lib/php5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619855
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 599342] Re: Temporary failure in name resolution

2010-08-18 Thread Jamie Strandboge
Serge, I am not an upstart expert and highly recommend you get Scott to
check this. While it seems sane I think we'd need to test 'airplane
mode' for people trying to do work on their laptops and the network
isn't up (though I would think the 'network-manager' bit should cover
it).

-- 
Temporary failure in name resolution
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599342
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619843] Re: euca-get-console-output returns one single line

2010-08-18 Thread Scott Moser
I see this too.  For the record, the error is not with the instance or
instance kernel itself (as we have seen on ec2).  The files in
/var/lib/eucalyptus/instances/admin/${INSTANCE_ID}/console.log does
exist and is populated, its contents just dont get back to the user.

** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
euca-get-console-output returns one single line
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619843
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 613309] Re: cloud-run-user-script.conf upstart script needs to run after all other cloud-init processes

2010-08-18 Thread Martin Pitt
Accepted cloud-init into lucid-proposed, the package will build now and
be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!

** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: In Progress = Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
cloud-run-user-script.conf upstart script needs to run after all other 
cloud-init processes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613309
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 609177] Re: Apport Hook

2010-08-18 Thread Adam Sommer
Thanks for the reviews.  Attached is a patch against the latest version.
I put the file in the apache2.2-common.install file because the
description of apache2-common has: This package contains the
configuration and support scripts..

To me the apport hook seems like a support script.  But I'm a little
fuzzy about when an apport hook should be in a source package versus a
binary package... so if I'm wrong please let me know.

Thanks again.

** Patch added: apport hook 2
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/609177/+attachment/1497957/+files/apache2_apport-hook.2.debdiff

-- 
Apport Hook
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609177
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619947] [NEW] initialization of autofs is erratic (no nis maps available)

2010-08-18 Thread Kike
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: autofs5


 I am using autofs to mount nfs home dirs. My autofs configuration uses NIS 
maps, and the auto.master looks like:
 +auto.master

 However, the NIS maps are not available after reboot. I have several scenarios.
 Case 1
 -
 NIS is most working. 
 Work around:
 1) I have to start nis ( /etc/init.d/nis start) because strangely it has not 
been started.
 2) I restart atufos (stop autofs, start autofs)

Case 2
 
 statd is not working.
  Work around:
 1) Start statd manually (/etc/init.d/statd start)
 2) I restart atufos (stop autofs, start autofs)

 It seems that it is related to the way the initialization daemon starts
the services. It has a big impact on the system, since users cannot
login after NIS and autofs is working, and manual intervention as root
has to be performed.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: autofs5 5.0.4-3.1ubuntu5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.39-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Aug 18 17:09:36 2010
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release amd64 (20091027)
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=es_ES.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: autofs5

** Affects: autofs5 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid

-- 
initialization of autofs is erratic (no nis maps available)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619947
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619947] Re: initialization of autofs is erratic (no nis maps available)

2010-08-18 Thread Kike

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619947/+attachment/1498044/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
initialization of autofs is erratic (no nis maps available)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619947
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 590929] Re: eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands

2010-08-18 Thread Dustin Kirkland
If I lower N from 200 to 50, I have been able to successfully do this a
dozen times or so.

for i in `seq 1 50` ; do euca-create-volume -z cluster1 -s 1 ; done
for i in `euca-describe-volumes | awk '{print $2}'` ; do euca-delete-volume $i 
; done

@eucalyptus developers: is there a known or expected limitation here?

** Also affects: eucalyptus
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590929
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619970] [NEW] suddenly no instance starts anymore - walrus issue?

2010-08-18 Thread C de-Avillez
Public bug reported:

Here's the deal: running a stress test, 600 instances. Life is good,
pretty much successes, with the (very) rare failure. Suddenly, pretty
much all we get are failures to start new instances. If I keep on
running, *no* new instance succeeds: they all go into pending, stay
there for a while, and are terminated by timeout.

A quick look at the NC logs shows an error like Failed to prepare
images for instance whatever (error 1):

On sapodilla:

ubu...@sapodilla:/var/log/eucalyptus$ grep Failed to prepare images *
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:11 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance  (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:11 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance  (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:11 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance i-50EC08E8 (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:11 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance i-51EF08FC (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:11 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance i-51EF08FC (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:11 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance ��d8� (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:11 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance `�8� (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:11 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance i-4FC10831 (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:11 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance i-4A8B0811 (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:11 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance  (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:11 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance P�{8� (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:11 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance i-43C50871 (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:11 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance i-456D0882 (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:11 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance i-37B107A3 (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:12 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance i-50EC08E8 (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:12 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance i-397606C6 (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:12 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance i-49B0087A (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:12 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance i-4A8B0811 (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:12 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance i-51EF08FC (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:12 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance i-50EC08E8 (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:12 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance i-33C805F7 (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:12 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance i-46AC06F8 (error=1)
nc.log:[Wed Aug 18 10:37:21 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images 
for instance � (error=1)
ubu...@sapodilla:/var/log/eucalyptus$ 

An equivalent list can be found on the other test NC.

Following one such instance, we can see (from the nc.log):

[Wed Aug 18 10:22:08 2010][001992][EUCAINFO  ] doRunInstance() invoked 
(id=i-50EC08E8 cores=1 disk=5 memory=256)
[Wed Aug 18 10:22:08 2010][001992][EUCAINFO  ]  
image=emi-3C651C4F at 
http://10.55.55.5:8773/services/Walrus/maverick-20100817-amd64-20100818080418/maverick-server-uec-amd64.img.manifest.xml
[Wed Aug 18 10:22:08 2010][001992][EUCAINFO  ]  
krnel=eki-D9512160 at 
http://10.55.55.5:8773/services/Walrus/maverick-20100817-amd64-20100818080418/maverick-server-uec-amd64-vmlinuz-virtual.manifest.xml
[Wed Aug 18 10:22:08 2010][001992][EUCAINFO  ]  vlan=12 
priMAC=D0:0D:50:EC:08:E8 privIp=172.19.5.5
[Wed Aug 18 10:22:08 2010][001992][EUCADEBUG ] state change for instance 
i-50EC08E8: Unknown - Staging (Pending)
[Wed Aug 18 10:22:08 2010][001992][EUCAINFO  ] network started for instance 
i-50EC08E8
[Wed Aug 18 10:22:08 2010][001992][EUCAINFO  ] retrieving images for instance 
i-50EC08E8 (disk limit=5120MB)...
...
[Wed Aug 18 10:37:11 2010][001992][EUCAERROR ] error: file 
/var/lib/eucalyptus/instances//eucalyptus/cache/eki-D9512160/kernel not found
[Wed Aug 18 10:37:11 2010][001992][EUCAFATAL ] Failed to prepare images for 
instance i-50EC08E8 (error=1)
[Wed Aug 18 10:37:11 2010][001992][EUCAERROR ] [Wed Aug 18 10:37:11 
2010][001992][EUCADEBUG ] state change for instance i-50EC08E8: Teardown - 
Shutoff (Extant)

I am not sure this is a cause or consequence of a previous error. Logs
are being saved.

** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: High
 Status: New

** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = High

-- 
suddenly no instance starts anymore - walrus issue?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619970

[Bug 619970] Re: suddenly no instance starts anymore - walrus issue?

2010-08-18 Thread C de-Avillez
Logs saved on /uec-qa/maverick/2.0~bzr1231-0ubuntu2/rig-
topo2-logs_20100818-113709.

Using saved push location: 
bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~hggdh2/%2Bjunk/uec-qa/
Pushed up to revision 39.

-- 
suddenly no instance starts anymore - walrus issue?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619970
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 590929] Re: eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands

2010-08-18 Thread mahmoh
** Also affects: jaguarundi
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: jaguarundi
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590929
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 590929] Re: eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands

2010-08-18 Thread C de-Avillez
I and Chris were able to repeat this by creating a lot of volumes batch
mode, pretty much like Dustin points above. We got a mix of losetup
errors (IIRC, a lock held), and various VG/LV; the result is an
inconsistent state: m loop devices, n VGs, and l LVs, with l  n  m.

-- 
eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590929
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 590929] Re: eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands

2010-08-18 Thread Dustin Kirkland
The system I'm working on here has a 127GB disk.  It seems I'm able to
create 50 x 1GB volumes, and then I get nothing but this error:


Volume: Error while communicating with Storage Controller: 
CreateStorageVolume:Your proposed upload exceeds the maximum allowed object 
size.

-- 
eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590929
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 590929] Re: eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands

2010-08-18 Thread Neil Soman
I have been unable to reproduce this issue against 2.0. Going to try
against 1.6.2 and report back.

@Dustin,

Volume: Error while communicating with Storage Controller:
CreateStorageVolume:Your proposed upload exceeds the maximum allowed
object size.

Web UI-configuration tab. Please increase the total max for volumes
(default is 50).

-- 
eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590929
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 590929] Re: eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands

2010-08-18 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Okay, I verified that cluster1.storage.maxtotalvolumesizeingb in the web
front end is greater than the size of volumes I'm trying to create.

I tried to create 100 x 1GB volumes, and 97 succeeded.  However, I did
get 3 failures:


$ euca-describe-volumes | grep failed
VOLUME  vol-5FBB065C 1  cluster1failed  
2010-08-19T01:26:50.968Z
VOLUME  vol-5957062E 1  cluster1failed  
2010-08-19T01:26:49.212Z
VOLUME  vol-5FC3065C 1  cluster1failed  
2010-08-19T01:26:51.71Z

-- 
eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590929
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 590929] Re: eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands

2010-08-18 Thread Neil Soman
Marking it invalid against the latest dev branch (2.0), but I will try
to reproduce it against 1.6.2.

** Changed in: eucalyptus
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590929
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 613535] Re: cloud-debug.log reports errno=2 trying to execute 'bttrack'

2010-08-18 Thread Neil Soman
** Also affects: eucalyptus/eucalyptus-devel
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
cloud-debug.log reports errno=2 trying to execute 'bttrack'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613535
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619970] Re: suddenly no instance starts anymore - walrus issue?

2010-08-18 Thread C de-Avillez
** Also affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu Maverick)
   Importance: High
   Status: New

-- 
suddenly no instance starts anymore - walrus issue?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619970
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619843] Re: euca-get-console-output returns one single line

2010-08-18 Thread C de-Avillez
** Also affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu Maverick)
   Importance: High
   Status: Confirmed

-- 
euca-get-console-output returns one single line
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619843
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619502] Re: package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.41-3ubuntu12 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal.

2010-08-18 Thread Serge Hallyn
Past experience (and googling) suggest synaptic might have been running
in the background, or a previous dpkg may have hung.  Can you paste the
output of 'ps -ef' in this bug report?  Check for 'synaptic', 'apt*', and
dpkg, and, if you don't see any of those, then re-try the mysql
reinstallation?


** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

** Changed in: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

-- 
package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.41-3ubuntu12 failed to install/upgrade: Package is 
in a very bad inconsistent state - you should  reinstall it before attempting a 
removal.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619502
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.1 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 350936] Re: Should shut down domains on system shutdown

2010-08-18 Thread Alastair Sherringham
I've been banging my head on this for over a day, pretty sick of the
reboot/test cycle. Nothing seemed to work - and then I was pointed at
this bug on IRC in #ubuntu-server.

I think it is essential that a KVM host attempts a clean shutdown of any
guests on host reboot. It was quite disconcerting to find KVM/libvirt
did not have this functionality in Ubuntu Server 10.04, especially since
I am now in production. This isn't production quality really.

Thanks to all above for the discussion and especially the suggestions. I
have used Francesco's suggestion in comment #8 and this seems to work.
It is very unsatisfactory to hack system scripts though (libvirt-
bin.conf and sendsigs). I hope something cleaner can be done - and since
10.04 is LTS, a back-port.

Thanks.

-- 
Should shut down domains on system shutdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350936
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619540] Re: package smbclient 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.5 failed to install/upgrade:

2010-08-18 Thread Serge Hallyn
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better.  Looking at the log files, it looks like you may have some corrupted
packages.  You might try removing the cached packages and refreshing
everything:

apt-get clean
apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade

From there, looking back at your main report, it looks like samba is
already installed on your system.  Check for the configuration file
at /etc/samba/smb.conf.


** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

-- 
package smbclient 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.5 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619540
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619712] Re: keepalived vrrp race condition and fix (versions 1.1.17 and 1.2.0 but perhaps all?)

2010-08-18 Thread Serge Hallyn
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu 
better.  Thanks
also for getting the upstream project involved.  I will mark this as triaged, 
with the expectation
that we will merge whatever fixes are needed from upstream.

** Changed in: keepalived (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Triaged

** Changed in: keepalived (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = High

-- 
keepalived vrrp race condition and fix (versions 1.1.17 and 1.2.0 but perhaps 
all?)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619712
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keepalived in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619773] Re: package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: subproces installed post-installation script gaf een foutwaarde 1 terug

2010-08-18 Thread Serge Hallyn
Hi Paul,

thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu 
better.  This isn't
the first report I've seen today involving 

debconf: DbDriver config: /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is
locked by another process

So I'm starting to suspect something fishy is going on, but just to make
sure, can you (a) tell us exactly what you were doing (i.e. using 'apt-get 
upgrade', using
synaptic to upgrade, or something else) and (b) paste the output of

ps -ef

into this bug report so we can check whether synaptic or a hung dpkg is
causing this?


** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

-- 
package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
subproces installed post-installation script gaf een foutwaarde 1 terug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619773
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 610479] Re: Instance fails to start

2010-08-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-virt/ubuntu/maverick/eucalyptus/2.0

-- 
Instance fails to start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610479
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619855] Re: session.gc_probablity=1 in /etc/php5/apache2/php.ini conflicts with permissions on /var/lib/php5

2010-08-18 Thread Serge Hallyn
Confirmed - when I installed php5, the /usr/share/php5/* files had
gc_probability=1.


** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Clint Byrum (clint-fewbar)

-- 
session.gc_probablity=1 in /etc/php5/apache2/php.ini conflicts with permissions 
on /var/lib/php5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619855
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619855] Re: session.gc_probablity=1 in /etc/php5/apache2/php.ini conflicts with permissions on /var/lib/php5

2010-08-18 Thread Serge Hallyn
Clint, please confirm whether there is not a good reason to set
gc_probability=0 as the package is being installed.

-- 
session.gc_probablity=1 in /etc/php5/apache2/php.ini conflicts with permissions 
on /var/lib/php5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619855
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619947] Re: initialization of autofs is erratic (no nis maps available)

2010-08-18 Thread Serge Hallyn
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better.  Please clarify - are you saying that upon rebooting the system, you
randomly get either statd or nis not starting?  While other times both start
fine and then autofs starts fine?  If so, do you have any idea why nis and
statd are failing to start?

Or, are you saying it is simply a timing issue, and autofs is sometimes started
before nis and statd start?

Note that since your autofs configuration depends upon nis and statd, I think
it would be good to modify your /etc/init/autofs to wait until both nis and
statd are available.

** Changed in: autofs5 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

** Changed in: autofs5 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

** Tags added: upstart

-- 
initialization of autofs is erratic (no nis maps available)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619947
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 590929] Re: eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands

2010-08-18 Thread Dustin Kirkland
I have also tried this with a sleep 1, in case we have a race condition

for i in `seq 1 200` ; do euca-create-volume -z cluster1 -s 1; sleep 1 ;
done

After creating a bunch (162) of volumes, I ended up getting:
Volume: Error while communicating with Storage Controller: 
CreateStorageVolume:Internal Error.
Volume: Error while communicating with Storage Controller: 
CreateStorageVolume:Internal Error.
Volume: Error while communicating with Storage Controller: 
CreateStorageVolume:Internal Error.

-- 
eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590929
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 620085] [NEW] libvirtd does not clean up pid file

2010-08-18 Thread Lee Hanxue
Public bug reported:

Hi,


I found out that libvirtd will incorretly create a pid file even when it does 
not start up properly. 

Error

libvirtd start
20:04:43.882: error : qemudWritePidFile:494 : Failed to open pid file 
'/var/run/libvirtd.pid' : File exists

Expected resolution

libvirtd should not create the pid file before it starts up successfully. 


Package version: 0.7.5-5ubuntu2
uname -a: Linux ip-xx-xx-xx-xx 2.6.32-305-ec2 #9-Ubuntu SMP Thu Apr 15 04:14:01 
UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux

Related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/510658
, but the difference is that when libvirtd fails to start up cleanly, it
should not have created the pid in the first place.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: libvirt-bin 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-305.9-ec2 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-305-ec2 i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Aug 18 20:07:32 2010
Ec2AMI: ami-2dea957f
Ec2AMIManifest: 
bitnami-cloud-ap/knowledgetree/bitnami-knowledgetree-3.7.0.2-1-linux-ubuntu-10.04.manifest.xml
Ec2AvailabilityZone: ap-southeast-1a
Ec2InstanceType: m1.small
Ec2Kernel: aki-bdf38cef
Ec2Ramdisk: unavailable
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: libvirt

** Affects: libvirt (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug ec2-images i386 lucid

-- 
libvirtd does not clean up pid file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620085
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 620085] Re: libvirtd does not clean up pid file

2010-08-18 Thread Lee Hanxue

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620085/+attachment/1498629/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
libvirtd does not clean up pid file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620085
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619769] Re: package samba-common 2:3.4. 7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: el subp roceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de error 10

2010-08-18 Thread Serge Hallyn
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better.  The dpkg log looks very suspicious.  Could you try doing a

   apt-get clean
   apt-get update
   apt-get dist-upgrade

and see if that helps at all?

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

-- 
package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: el 
subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de 
error 10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619769
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 620085] Re: libvirtd does not clean up pid file

2010-08-18 Thread Serge Hallyn
Thank you for taking the time to make Ubuntu better. Since the core
pidfile handling is handled by libvirt itself, what you are asking for
is a development request which should be discussed with the libvirt
upstream community, either over irc or the libvirt mailing list.


** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Won't Fix

** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Wishlist

-- 
libvirtd does not clean up pid file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620085
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 599342] Re: Temporary failure in name resolution

2010-08-18 Thread Serge Hallyn
Hi Scott,  would you mind taking a look at the proposed tweak
to /etc/init/libvirt-bin.conf?  There is probably a better way...

Thanks!

-- 
Temporary failure in name resolution
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599342
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 620102] [NEW] package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-08-18 Thread kelmark2180
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: samba

Use samba to access ubuntu server on home network. After updates this laptop 
would not shutdown and I had to reload w/boot. When it tried to re-establish 
server access it said samba mod did not install.
This laptop is xbuntu10.04.1 LTS
Server = Ubuntu 9.10 (Kbuntu?)
I guess this may have been a permanent share thru smbfs

Don

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.39-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Aug 18 14:49:43 2010
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 1
PackageArchitecture: all
SambaClientRegression: Yes
SourcePackage: samba
Title: package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid

-- 
package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620102
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 620102] Re: package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-08-18 Thread kelmark2180

** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620102/+attachment/1498701/+files/AptOrdering.txt

** Attachment added: CIFSMounts.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620102/+attachment/1498702/+files/CIFSMounts.txt

** Attachment added: CifsVersion.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620102/+attachment/1498703/+files/CifsVersion.txt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620102/+attachment/1498704/+files/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Df.txt
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620102/+attachment/1498705/+files/Df.txt

** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620102/+attachment/1498706/+files/Dmesg.txt

** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620102/+attachment/1498707/+files/DpkgTerminalLog.gz

** Attachment added: SambaInstalledVersions.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620102/+attachment/1498708/+files/SambaInstalledVersions.txt

-- 
package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620102
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 524341] Re: Add amavisd-new-postfix package

2010-08-18 Thread StefanPotyra
Any news wrt. maverick's release?

-- 
Add amavisd-new-postfix package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524341
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 590639] Re: apache exit with signal Segmentation fault (11) on access to https:// if php5-curl enabled

2010-08-18 Thread Christie Koehler
Confirming that the patch posted by Miroslav Zacek works for me as well.
Many thanks!

-- 
apache exit with signal Segmentation fault (11) on access to https:// if 
php5-curl enabled
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590639
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 590639] Re: apache exit with signal Segmentation fault (11) on access to https:// if php5-curl enabled

2010-08-18 Thread William McGrath
Ditto here. Now we wait for openssl to be updated :-)

-- 
apache exit with signal Segmentation fault (11) on access to https:// if 
php5-curl enabled
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590639
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 599342] Re: Temporary failure in name resolution

2010-08-18 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Reassigning to Scott, as you're asking for his input.

Scott, once you're done with this, please assign it back to Serge.
Thanks!

** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu Maverick)
 Assignee: Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn) = Scott James Remnant (scott)

-- 
Temporary failure in name resolution
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599342
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 616759] Re: CVE-2009-3555 tracking bug

2010-08-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/dapper-proposed/openssl

** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic-proposed/openssl

** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/jaunty-proposed/openssl

** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/hardy-proposed/openssl

** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/lucid-proposed/openssl

-- 
CVE-2009-3555 tracking bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616759
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 620155] [NEW] package winbind 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2010-08-18 Thread Simon Vass
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: samba

winbind crashed after a recontructor live dvd build

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: winbind 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.39-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Aug 18 20:54:05 2010
Df:
 
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 2
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429)
RelatedPackageVersions:
 nautilus 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1.1
 gvfs 1.6.1-0ubuntu1build1
SambaClientRegression: Yes
SourcePackage: samba
Title: package winbind 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid

-- 
package winbind 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620155
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 620155] Re: package winbind 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2010-08-18 Thread Simon Vass

** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620155/+attachment/1498922/+files/AptOrdering.txt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620155/+attachment/1498923/+files/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620155/+attachment/1498924/+files/Dmesg.txt

** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620155/+attachment/1498925/+files/DpkgTerminalLog.gz

** Attachment added: SambaInstalledVersions.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620155/+attachment/1498926/+files/SambaInstalledVersions.txt

-- 
package winbind 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620155
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 599342] Re: Temporary failure in name resolution

2010-08-18 Thread Scott James Remnant
I'm pretty sure mixing and/or like that will have disastrous
consequences (bug #447654) - please don't

** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu Maverick)
 Assignee: Scott James Remnant (scott) = Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn)

-- 
Temporary failure in name resolution
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599342
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 609177] Re: Apport Hook

2010-08-18 Thread Benjamin Drung
@Mathias: Ok, that's reasonable.

@Adam: If you have an apport hook for a binary package, it belong to the
binary package that it is for. It will be only used if you report a bug
against this binary package. In contrast a _source apport hook will be
used for all binary packages that are build from this source and
therefore should be put in one binary package that's always installed if
you install one of the binary package.

-- 
Apport Hook
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609177
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 620174] Re: package postfix 2.6.5-3 failed to install/upgrade:

2010-08-18 Thread bapu

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620174/+attachment/1498966/+files/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620174/+attachment/1498967/+files/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz

** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620174/+attachment/1498968/+files/VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz

** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620174/+attachment/1498969/+files/VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz

** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620174/+attachment/1498970/+files/VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz

-- 
package postfix 2.6.5-3 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620174
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 246190] Re: nmap reports wrong service for port 9102

2010-08-18 Thread Brian Murray
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #593526
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593526

** Also affects: nmap (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593526
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
nmap reports wrong service for port 9102
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246190
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nmap in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 619004] Re: package clamav-daemon (not inst alled) failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 1

2010-08-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
Reassigning to the installer then.

** Package changed: clamav (Ubuntu) = ubiquity (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = New

-- 
package clamav-daemon (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo 
script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619004
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 620174] Re: package postfix 2.6.5-3 failed to install/upgrade:

2010-08-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
How did you remove /etc/init.d/postfix:

update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/postfix: file does not exist
dpkg: error processing postfix (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
package postfix 2.6.5-3 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620174
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 590929] Re: eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands

2010-08-18 Thread Neil Soman
Against 1.6.2, I tried a test which involved creating and deleting 50
volumes in a tight loop, which passed successfully. With 100 volumes, I
was able to trigger a failure to clean up volumes. In addition, once the
max volume limit is reached and exceeded, occasionally, volumes are not
cleaned up properly. I have seen the Volume: Error while communicating
with Storage Controller: CreateStorageVolume:Internal Error. message on
occasion, when this happens.

None of these issues can be reproduced against 2.0. Version 2.0 has a
number of fixes that have to deal with failure recovery and CLC/SC
communication that helps scale. At this point, backporting these to
1.6.2 does not make a lot of sense (they are non trivial), since 2.0
will be released shortly, but the upstream is willing to discuss a
possible backport effort if this is critical and upgrading to 2.0 is not
an option.

-- 
eucalyptus create and delete volumes sometimes fail on lvm commands
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590929
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 554094] Re: Windows clients cannot connect unless Samba manually restarted

2010-08-18 Thread Charles Burns
This problem appears to be resolved with a recent update. I've restarted
my server and Samba came right up.

-- 
Windows clients cannot connect unless Samba manually restarted
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 620174] Re: package postfix 2.6.5-3 failed to install/upgrade:

2010-08-18 Thread bapu
Can that be restored somehow?

-- 
package postfix 2.6.5-3 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620174
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 578930] Re: Lucid qemu-kvm: ksmd default config is CPU hog

2010-08-18 Thread Nullzone

Hello Thierry,
 
  I will try to help showing some information gathered from my lab server as 
you requested:
 
- Enviroment:
 
 10 x Ubuntu 10.04 x86_64 with several services (SMTP, MySQL, Oracle, DB2, 
TeamSpeak servers, Tomcats, bind ... etc).
 1 x Windows 7 x86_64
 3 x Debian Lenny x86_64 (iscsitarget, pacemaker cluster testing)
 
 RAM schema (assigned to the VMs): 3 vms 128 MB, 6 vms 256 MB, 2 vms 512 MB, 1 
vm 768 MB, 2 vms 1GB
 SMP: 5 vms with 2 SMP (num vCPU) configured, rest 1 SMP
 
- Hardware:
 
 1 x Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU   @ 2.66GHz
 8 GB RAM DDR2 800 Mhz / 25 ns

 -

* Summary:

Usefull information:
  CPU % usage goes stable, also memory is examined and released after the 3rd 
full_scans
  CPU % usage is specially high between 1st and 2nd scan (when ksm is merging 
pages at the same time that it is doing the second scan)
  Memory starts being released after the 1st scan is completly and the 2nd is 
in progress (so past some minutes)
 
KSM default pages_to_scan:100 sleep_millisecs:20 CPU: ~11,67% 
Time_for_a_full_scan: 3m35.209s
KSM pages_to_scan:60 sleep_millisecs:40 CPU: ~3,44% Time_for_a_full_scan: 
11m50.734s
KSM pages_to_scan:100 sleep_millisecs:50 CPU: ~4,21% Time_for_a_full_scan: 
8m55.533s
KSM pages_to_scan:60 sleep_millisecs:60 CPU: ~2,00% Time_for_a_full_scan: 
17m46.094s
KSM pages_to_scan:100 sleep_millisecs:120 CPU: ~1,67% Time_for_a_full_scan: 
21m26.285s
 
Mem Optimization in all the tests (there before or after):
  RAM available (reminder): 8 GB
  Memory optimizacition thanks to ksm: 14-16% full available memory (~ 1.3 / 
1.1 Gb of more free memory)

Conclusions:
  ksm is good but need some tweaks to doesnt become a problem more than a help
  I'd consider to off ksm in /etc/default/qemu-kvm for desktop versions of 
Ubuntu (availabe but off by default)
  I'd consider to switch default value of sleep_millisecs: 120 even a bit 
higher in the ubuntu server version. More conservative...
 
 ---
 
 
 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# echo 2  /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/run
 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# sleep 30
 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# landscape-sysinfo 
   System load: 1.02  IP address for lo: xxx
   Usage of /home:  66.1% of 2.68TB   IP address for eth1:   xxx
   Memory usage:60%   IP address for eth1:0: xxx
   Swap usage:  0%IP address for bond0:  xxx
   Processes:   199   IP address for br0:xxx
   Users logged in: 1
 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# echo 1  /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/run ; time 
/tmp/tmp.bash
 real3m35.209s
 user0m0.070s
 sys 0m0.130s
 [... /tmp/tmp.bash
 #!/bin/bash 

 while true
 do
   SALIDA=`cat /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/full_scans`
   if [ $SALIDA == 1 ]
   then
  break
   else
  sleep 5
   fi
 done
  yeee... terrible but enough for a script done in 10 secs...]
 [...waiting for a pair of aditional scans...]
 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# cat full_scans
 3
 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# ps axuw | grep ksm | grep -v grep 
 root53 10.7  0.0  0 0 ?SN   17:51  12:08  \_ [ksmd]
 
 (Cycle/scan time is 3m35secs ~= 215 secs -- doing check each 2 secs so I'll 
use iostat -p pid 2 215/2)
 
 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# pidstat -p 53 2 108
 Linux 2.6.32-24-server (core)   18/08/10_x86_64_(4 CPU)
 [...]
 Media: 530,00   11,670,00   11,67 -  ksmd

 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# cat full_scans 
 4
 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# cat max_kernel_pages 
 511518
 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# cat pages_shared 
 42045
 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# cat pages_sharing 
 287118
 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# cat pages_to_scan 
 100
 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# cat pages_unshared 
 622240
 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# cat pages_volatile 
 97214
 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# cat run 
 1
 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# cat sleep_millisecs 
 20

 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# cat /proc/meminfo 
 MemTotal:8194212 kB
 MemFree: 1000880 kB
 Buffers:  432396 kB
 Cached:  2865740 kB
 SwapCached:0 kB
 [...]
 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# landscape-sysinfo 
  System load: 6.44  IP address for lo: xxx
  Usage of /home:  66.1% of 2.68TB   IP address for eth1:   xxx
  Memory usage:44%   IP address for eth1:0: xxx
  Swap usage:  0%IP address for bond0:  xxx
  Processes:   199   IP address for br0:xxx
  Users logged in: 1


 
 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# echo 2  /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/run
 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# sleep 30
 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# echo 40  /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/sleep_millisecs
 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# echo 60  /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/pages_to_scan
 r...@core:/sys/kernel/mm/ksm# echo 1  /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/run ; time 

Re: [Bug 620174] Re: package postfix 2.6.5-3 failed to install/upgrade:

2010-08-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
The standard way to do it is to purge (not just remove) the package, but
that probably won't work with the postinst failing.  You might,
depending on you level of comfort with such things edit the postinst to
not call update-rc.d. I'm away from my computers now so it's difficult
to advise on the best course of action.

-- 
package postfix 2.6.5-3 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620174
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 620174] Re: package postfix 2.6.5-3 failed to install/upgrade:

2010-08-18 Thread bapu
I was able to finally remove postfix and then reinstall it.

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Scott Kitterman
ubu...@kitterman.comwrote:

 The standard way to do it is to purge (not just remove) the package, but
 that probably won't work with the postinst failing.  You might,
 depending on you level of comfort with such things edit the postinst to
 not call update-rc.d. I'm away from my computers now so it's difficult
 to advise on the best course of action.

 --
 package postfix 2.6.5-3 failed to install/upgrade:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620174
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in “postfix” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete

 Bug description:
 Binary package hint: postfix

 Upgrading from 8.04 to 9.10

 ProblemType: Package
 Architecture: amd64
 Date: Wed Aug 18 16:23:58 2010
 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
 ErrorMessage:
  ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error
 exit status 1
 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
 Package: postfix 2.6.5-3
 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.28-19.62-generic
 SourcePackage: postfix
 Title: package postfix 2.6.5-3 failed to install/upgrade:
 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-19-generic x86_64

 To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/620174/+subscribe


-- 
package postfix 2.6.5-3 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620174
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 620243] [NEW] package libmysqlclient16 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.16.0.0', which is also in package mysql-cluster-client-5.1 0:7.0.

2010-08-18 Thread Judd Seger
Public bug reported:

  package libmysqlclient16 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.16.0.0', which is also
in package mysql-cluster-client-5.1 0:7.0.9-1ubuntu7

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: libmysqlclient16 (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.39-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Aug 18 22:26:12 2010
ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.16.0.0', which is 
also in package mysql-cluster-client-5.1 0:7.0.9-1ubuntu7
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Netbook 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429.4)
SourcePackage: mysql-dfsg-5.1
Title: package libmysqlclient16 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: 
trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.16.0.0', which is also in 
package mysql-cluster-client-5.1 0:7.0.9-1ubuntu7

** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid ubuntu-une

-- 
package libmysqlclient16 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to 
overwrite '/usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.16.0.0', which is also in package 
mysql-cluster-client-5.1 0:7.0.9-1ubuntu7
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620243
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.1 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 620243] Re: package libmysqlclient16 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.16.0.0', which is also in package mysql-cluster-client-5.1 0:7.0.9-

2010-08-18 Thread Judd Seger

** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620243/+attachment/1499277/+files/AptOrdering.txt

** Attachment added: Df.txt
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620243/+attachment/1499278/+files/Df.txt

** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620243/+attachment/1499279/+files/Dmesg.txt

** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620243/+attachment/1499280/+files/DpkgTerminalLog.txt

-- 
package libmysqlclient16 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to 
overwrite '/usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.16.0.0', which is also in package 
mysql-cluster-client-5.1 0:7.0.9-1ubuntu7
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620243
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.1 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs