Re: Youtube channel created for Ubuntu Studio - contributors needed to submit tutorials
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Kaj Ailomaa zeque...@mousike.me wrote: We now have a youtube channel for Ubuntu Studio https://www.youtube.com/user/ubuntustudiotube. It's linked to the Ubuntu Studio G+ page, so all page managers should also be able to manage the youtube channel. I'll announce it later on social sites, and mail lists. The primary reason for the channel is to host tutorials. So far we have no written down guidelines for how to do this. I'll prepare some later. But, for now, something like this should do: Category tree for tutorials: * main workflow (i.e., audio, video, graphics, etc) * sub workflow (i.e., recording, mixing, mastering, editing, etc) So, we could name one video something like: audio - recording - setting up ardour for recording or: video - modelling - how to create a soccer ball. The videos don't need to be long. And we don't need to cover everything imaginable. Just some basic stuff to begin with. So, short and to the point is much appreciated. The videos should have: * recorded desktop - both audio and video from the actual workflow * english subs - describing what is going on Spoken english is voluntary. Not sure what we should do about background music, and such, but for now, I think we don't need to use it at all. Would be nice to have a pool of music that is suitable for using in the background (preferably something somewhat soft, that works for all age groups and style preferences), and that we can use on multiple videos. We should ask for submissions for this separately. Tutorials for audio related workflows probably don't require background music anyway. Great initiative! With some guidelines on how to create them so we get a similar look'n'feel I would try to do some tutorials. I vote strongly against background music in tutorials. Especially if you do a voice over of what you are doing or when the tutorial is concerning audio or video production, I think it's unnecessary and collide with the information you are trying to get through. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Contributors needed to define our workflows
I am available for testing of audio applications for use in web radio and live situations. In addition I'd like to test a possible version of ubuntu live as to perform only to usb memory stick on host systems with ability to store data on the stick. Io mi rendo disponibile per fare test su applicazioni audio da utilizzare in ambito web radio ed in situazion live . In oltre mi piacerebbe testare una eventuale versione di ubuntu live da far eseguire solo su chiavetta su sistemi ospiti con possibilità di archiviare dati sulla chiavetta. Marco BRUNO www.radioabawalla.net 2013/6/5 Kaj Ailomaa zeque...@mousike.me We need people who can investigate our different workflows, and make sure we are including the appropriate applications for each workflow. The workflows are: * audio * graphics * video * photography * publishing * desktop (generic tools for standard desktop use) There's currently no strict method on how to do this, but here are some rules we try to abide by: * for each use case, include only one application (there may be reasons to make exceptions in some cases) * don't include applications of your personal preference, when given a choice. Choose the one that is most popular (if most users use A, they won't be used to the B interface). This particular task of defining our workflows really doesn't require any skills at all, other than user skills. The more experienced you are as a user the better. Though, of course, we need our workflows to work for everyone, not just one group of people. I'm going to try to fish for contributors on our social sites later as well for this. If you know anyone that might be interested in this, don't hesitate to pass this along. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Youtube channel created for Ubuntu Studio - contributors needed to submit tutorials
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 09:01 AM, Jimmy Sjölund wrote: Great initiative! With some guidelines on how to create them so we get a similar look'n'feel I would try to do some tutorials. I vote strongly against background music in tutorials. Especially if you do a voice over of what you are doing or when the tutorial is concerning audio or video production, I think it's unnecessary and collide with the information you are trying to get through. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel You are welcome to create some, and in the process establish some standards for how they should be edited. I think it would be enough with: * intro page, with title and description of the tutorial (this could use a bit of artwork) * temporary zoom-ins when attention to detail is required. * subs explaining what happens on screen I'd rather not do voice overs unless they are fairly good quality, and the person speaks well enough English for it to be clearly understandable. That's my initial standpoint anyway. If we want voice overs, we could always add them afterwards too. I think it might be nice for some form of tutorials to have music in the background, but not any kind of music. It needs to be something generic enough to work on all people. If you're up to it, you are welcome to edit/oversee all of the tutorials, if others help creating them. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Contributors needed to define our workflows
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 09:13 AM, Marco BRUNO wrote: I am available for testing of audio applications for use in web radio and live situations. In addition I'd like to test a possible version of ubuntu live as to perform only to usb memory stick on host systems with ability to store data on the stick. Io mi rendo disponibile per fare test su applicazioni audio da utilizzare in ambito web radio ed in situazion live . In oltre mi piacerebbe testare una eventuale versione di ubuntu live da far eseguire solo su chiavetta su sistemi ospiti con possibilità di archiviare dati sulla chiavetta. Marco BRUNO www.radioabawalla.net Great! Initially, if you already know of existing problems with this, or that we should include some applications, just start a new thread and explain it to us. I will need to look deeper at a good way to investigate a certain workflow. I like to be as thorough as I can, but also, not cause too much work on people :). -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Video players
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Hartmut Noack zettber...@linuxuse.dewrote: 4) I have sync all the videos to the music file. To do this in Mac or Windows the video editor often support scrubbing, so you can pinpoint the audio in the current video with the same spot in the song. Kdenlive does not support scrubbing so I have to look for obvious things in the track, like certain words sung or when an instrument start to play. Just orientate by the waveforms and you get it perfectly in sync. Since your videoclips are shot at the very recording you can align the audio of the videoclip and the mixed-down song just perfectly... That is what I do at first to get it narrowed down, but unfortunately my experience is that the waveforms that are displayed are not accurate enough and I need to nudge a couple (or sometimes even more) frames forward or backwards to get it to sync perfectly. This I can do either visually or when I let both audio sound at the same time. Any delay in between them means they are not in sync even though the waveforms are. But that is most likely a discussion I should bring up with the Kdenlive people. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Youtube channel created for Ubuntu Studio - contributors needed to submit tutorials
Hi Kaj, Of course the Ubuntu QA team has our own videos (recorded by the famous Nicholas Skaggs). I guess though we can tutor people to use our own system, For instance, we can show people how to do the Post-installation (Ubuntu Studio) ISO test. Regards, Howard Chan (smartboyhw) Ubuntu Studio Release Manager On 2013-6-5 下午3:47, Kaj Ailomaa zeque...@mousike.me wrote: On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 09:31 AM, Ho Wan Chan wrote: Hi everyone, interesting to see Kaj created a YouTube channel (as planned). Hurray! @Kaj: After my exams maybe I should do a video on testing (maybe with Maik too)… Regards, Howard Chan (smartboyhw) Ubuntu Studio Release Manager On 2013-6-5 下午3:22, Kaj Ailomaa zeque...@mousike.me wrote: Good idea about testing. But, I wonder, are there any already available for Ubuntu? In any case, we could have our own. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Youtube channel created for Ubuntu Studio - contributors needed to submit tutorials
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Kaj Ailomaa zeque...@mousike.me wrote: You are welcome to create some, and in the process establish some standards for how they should be edited. If you're up to it, you are welcome to edit/oversee all of the tutorials, if others help creating them. It would be a great opportunity for me to give something back to the community! -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Youtube channel created for Ubuntu Studio - contributors needed to submit tutorials
great ! For open source software only, or for apps like Mixbus and Lightwork ? Antoine THOMAS Tél: 0663137906 2013/6/5 Ho Wan Chan smartbo...@gmail.com Hi Kaj, Of course the Ubuntu QA team has our own videos (recorded by the famous Nicholas Skaggs). I guess though we can tutor people to use our own system, For instance, we can show people how to do the Post-installation (Ubuntu Studio) ISO test. Regards, Howard Chan (smartboyhw) Ubuntu Studio Release Manager On 2013-6-5 下午3:47, Kaj Ailomaa zeque...@mousike.me wrote: On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 09:31 AM, Ho Wan Chan wrote: Hi everyone, interesting to see Kaj created a YouTube channel (as planned). Hurray! @Kaj: After my exams maybe I should do a video on testing (maybe with Maik too)… Regards, Howard Chan (smartboyhw) Ubuntu Studio Release Manager On 2013-6-5 下午3:22, Kaj Ailomaa zeque...@mousike.me wrote: Good idea about testing. But, I wonder, are there any already available for Ubuntu? In any case, we could have our own. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Youtube channel created for Ubuntu Studio - contributors needed to submit tutorials
On 06/05/2013 06:06 AM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: We now have a youtube channel for Ubuntu Studio https://www.youtube.com/user/ubuntustudiotube. It's linked to the Ubuntu Studio G+ page, so all page managers should also be able to manage the youtube channel. I'll announce it later on social sites, and mail lists. The primary reason for the channel is to host tutorials. So far we have no written down guidelines for how to do this. I'll prepare some later. But, for now, something like this should do: Category tree for tutorials: * main workflow (i.e., audio, video, graphics, etc) * sub workflow (i.e., recording, mixing, mastering, editing, etc) So, we could name one video something like: audio - recording - setting up ardour for recording or: video - modelling - how to create a soccer ball. The videos don't need to be long. And we don't need to cover everything imaginable. Just some basic stuff to begin with. So, short and to the point is much appreciated. The videos should have: * recorded desktop - both audio and video from the actual workflow * english subs - describing what is going on Spoken english is voluntary. Not sure what we should do about background music, and such, but for now, I think we don't need to use it at all. Would be nice to have a pool of music that is suitable for using in the background (preferably something somewhat soft, that works for all age groups and style preferences), and that we can use on multiple videos. We should ask for submissions for this separately. Tutorials for audio related workflows probably don't require background music anyway. Are there any requirements for what we can have in the OS if we are doing a video? For example I am still using the LTS 12.04. So my menus might look a bit different from what we currently have. That might confuse people -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Video players
On Wed, June 5, 2013 12:32 am, Jimmy Sjölund wrote: On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Hartmut Noack zettber...@linuxuse.dewrote: 4) I have sync all the videos to the music file. To do this in Mac or Windows the video editor often support scrubbing, so you can pinpoint the audio in the current video with the same spot in the song. Kdenlive does not support scrubbing so I have to look for obvious things in the track, like certain words sung or when an instrument start to play. Just orientate by the waveforms and you get it perfectly in sync. Since your videoclips are shot at the very recording you can align the audio of the videoclip and the mixed-down song just perfectly... That is what I do at first to get it narrowed down, but unfortunately my experience is that the waveforms that are displayed are not accurate enough and I need to nudge a couple (or sometimes even more) frames forward or backwards to get it to sync perfectly. This I can do either visually or when I let both audio sound at the same time. Any delay in between them means they are not in sync even though the waveforms are. But that is most likely a discussion I should bring up with the Kdenlive people. I would assume you are using more than one camera if you are taking shots of different instruments all in one take. Unless they are all the same make and model of camera, the sync from audio to video may be different from camera to camera. A visual cue such as a strobe may be a better tool for syncing. Also pay attention to frame rate, though I would guess that if you are happy with things once they are synced this is ok. Different frame rates would of course make sync wander from one end of a video to the other. I expect that on a very long video you would loose sync towards the end anyway as your cameras are not running from a master clock. In TV broadcast situations all video sources get their sync from one master clock through the same length of cable round trip to the switcher, this includes cameras, VCRs, telecine, and titling/animation. Off site video is framestored so it can be synced to station... kind of like resampling. -- Len Ovens www.OvenWerks.net -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Youtube channel created for Ubuntu Studio - contributors needed to submit tutorials
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 03:38 PM, Shubham Mishra wrote: Are there any requirements for what we can have in the OS if we are doing a video? For example I am still using the LTS 12.04. So my menus might look a bit different from what we currently have. That might confuse people -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel I don't think that is a problem. It's more important that the applications themselves haven't changed too much. Also, the menu is prone to changes between releases, so that is hard to avoid anyway. We should mark the videos by release as well, if it's important to do so. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Video players
On Wed, June 5, 2013 2:34 am, edmund wrote: On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 01:21:19 +0200 Hartmut Noack zettber...@linuxuse.de wrote: Am 04.06.2013 02:43, schrieb Len Ovens: On Mon, June 3, 2013 8:02 am, edmund wrote: What are you calling uncommon sample rates? Ubuntu Studio is for multi media and in my case High res audio. Here we use 96 kHz and 192 kHz sample rates. Of course I have recorded in these samplerates also and in very few cases it really makes a difference. Most notably to me was, that Alsa Modular Synths sounds quite different at 96KHz. That is possible... but, the audio in and out of a computer even at 96Khz is still limited to just over 20kHz. The differences you are hearing may be as a result of the math at higher frequencies affecting what ends up in the 20-20kHz passband. VLC player, Is made to play the audio, that is relevant out there, where people listen to music that is mixed and mastered and that is: 48KHz Video, 44.1KHz Audio and that is it. The bluray standard is 192/24, you don't get anything extra for your money, but it is the standard. Much of the audio on such music started out as 48/16... (If it was on tape originally then 48/13 or less) seems to play these formats too but it doesn't! When I play a 80 kHz sine it is audible Shouldn't be, but then really there is no reason to play an 80k sine through a computer because there are no known sound interfaces able to reproduce signals of that frequency anyway. The analogue part of the chain makes sure of that. No I mean playing a 80 kHz sine (with a 192kHz sample rate) I made a number of sines with audacity and played them with VLC among other players, VLC produces ghost sounds with sine waves above a certain frequency. So paying music with VLC in that format makes you hear things you never heard before, great! Pity that the difference is fake and distortion rather then more music information. That would be whatever does the resample or down/upsample. However, there is no (and shouldn't be anyway) program material (even bluray 192 sample rate stuff) that has 80khz content anyway. Any of the mics one can buy start to roll of around 18hz (even condenser mics). So any signals above that are artificially created. Buy some analogue test equipment and test it for yourself. See what the highest frequency is that you can import and export with your sound card. There is an audible difference, but it is not in audio at 80khz. Many audio programs use poor quality resampling BTW. VLC would depend on it's libs. This is something to consider. There are a lot of video players, but they depend on only a few codec libs. We should break down our choices based on the underlying libs I think. -- Len Ovens www.OvenWerks.net -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Video players
Am 05.06.2013 11:34, schrieb edmund: On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 01:21:19 +0200 Hartmut Noack zettber...@linuxuse.de wrote: Am 04.06.2013 02:43, schrieb Len Ovens: On Mon, June 3, 2013 8:02 am, edmund wrote: What are you calling uncommon sample rates? Ubuntu Studio is for multi media and in my case High res audio. Here we use 96 kHz and 192 kHz sample rates. Of course I have recorded in these samplerates also and in very few cases it really makes a difference. Most notably to me was, that Alsa Modular Synths sounds quite different at 96KHz. VLC player, Is made to play the audio, that is relevant out there, where people listen to music that is mixed and mastered and that is: 48KHz Video, 44.1KHz Audio and that is it. seems to play these formats too but it doesn't! When I play a 80 kHz sine it is audible audible, you say hmmm But maybe here we misunderstand: you mean, a, say: 1KHz sine with 80KHz samplerate right? No I mean playing a 80 kHz sine (with a 192kHz sample rate) I made a number of sines with audacity and played them with VLC among other players, VLC produces ghost sounds with sine waves above a certain frequency. So paying music with VLC in that format makes you hear things you never heard before, great! Pity that the difference is fake and distortion rather then more music information. r a player, that is made to play distributed audio as - something very different. It is far below 20 kHz and clearly audible on 10 Euro loudspeakers, so it is definitely not 80 kHz. I would say ditch it or use it for things that doesn't matter but not for playing high res or quality audio. Quality audio is 16/44.1 CDDA, carefully mastered and dithered from recordings, that may or may not be recorded at higher rates. Whether it is required or not to use higher sample rates for perfect audio reproduction is another discussion. But at the moment there is no such thing as a perfect audio system. So claims as 44.1 kHz or MP3 is enough holds no water. MP3 or OGG is not enough at all. The difference is clearly audible when you compare it with a uncompressed stream of original recordings. Commercially matered material is stripped down often anyway so the compression does not make great differences but it is perfectly feasable to record, mix and distribute audio in a way, that uncompressed PCM does sound quite different than MP3 or OGG of the same material. But 16/44.1 is hard to beat and 16/48 is not. I, BTW, have ditched the 96KHz experiments and use 48KHz with all great results and 9 out of 10 professional Studios do the same. The dutch concert hall records in SACD format Interesting, so they do not use PCM but Delta-Sigma-Modulation in the first place or do they use 24/192 PCM and interpolate later? Anyway: one fine day when more than 0.1% of the listeners out there own a SACD-drive or when anyone out there is eager to play DSM-streams on a computer, I guess VLC will adopt. Oh and yes it does so under windows too. Whatever rate you use, the input and the output of any of the audio interfaces people have tested has been 20-2Hz. I experienced, that it does make a difference, when a lowpass at 20KHz is applied but 48KHz deliver 24KHz and anything beyond that is indeed irrelevant. Distortion and noise have a real impact when HiFi is concerned, frequencies, that are beyond the double of human hearing do not. Well it is no so simple to determine what the human hearing is capable of in the first place and show me the first audio set on which I cannot hear the difference between a real cymbal and a cymbal played on that audio set. The effect is even more apalling when you compare a distorted Guitar from a Marshallstack with a recording of it. And the reason is physics: any speaker is just a simulation, it can create soundwaves, that have more or less the very same characteristics as the original, very very complex soundwave made by an instrument in a room. But they cannot be the same: 8x12 inch of speakermembranes that have no other obligation but creating a blast of metalguitars cannot be perfectly mimicked by a pair of 8-Speakers, that has to produce Bass, drums and singer also... So there may be more to do to bring more of the real thing to the homes of the audiophiles. But I doubt, that higher frequency-ranges will help. In my experience Ardour works perfectly well with PCM of any samplerate. And I would not bother to play such recordings using a player, that is made for average distributed media. On the contrary! I am happy to have a player like VLC, that will reveal whether I did something wrong when rendering a file for end-user distribution. best regards HZN Edmund -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Youtube channel created for Ubuntu Studio - contributors needed to submit tutorials
About backing music: Google scans all videos uploaded to Youtube for backing music for the RIAA and publishers. They then offer the copythugs the options to silence soundtracks, put ads on the videos, track users, or do nothing. There is no legal requirement for them to do this, as the safe harbor provisions of the DCMA state that 3ed party webhosts need only remove content after getting formal notice to be totally shielded from lawsuits. Google probably feared their size would lead the US Congress to change that law. This was the original reason I left Youtube for Liveleak. Since then the new Google TOS came along to permit browser fingerprinting (added words or device information) so now I won't even connect to any Google server except via Torbrowser, which is designed (via Torbutton) to resist fingerprinting attacks as well as obfuscate the IP address. I understand few here face the security issues I do, but if you use music on Google you risk losing the entire sountrack. Also users of this channel might have issues forming Youtube/Gmail accounts of their own as Google's tracking will show them as already adminsistering and logging into one account-and Google has a real names policy and tries to flag multiple accounts held by any one user. On 06/05/2013 at 3:21 AM, Kaj Ailomaa zeque...@mousike.me wrote: On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 09:01 AM, Jimmy Sjölund wrote: Great initiative! With some guidelines on how to create them so we get a similar look'n'feel I would try to do some tutorials. I vote strongly against background music in tutorials. Especially if you do a voice over of what you are doing or when the tutorial is concerning audio or video production, I think it's unnecessary and collide with the information you are trying to get through. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel You are welcome to create some, and in the process establish some standards for how they should be edited. I think it would be enough with: * intro page, with title and description of the tutorial (this could use a bit of artwork) * temporary zoom-ins when attention to detail is required. * subs explaining what happens on screen I'd rather not do voice overs unless they are fairly good quality, and the person speaks well enough English for it to be clearly understandable. That's my initial standpoint anyway. If we want voice overs, we could always add them afterwards too. I think it might be nice for some form of tutorials to have music in the background, but not any kind of music. It needs to be something generic enough to work on all people. If you're up to it, you are welcome to edit/oversee all of the tutorials, if others help creating them. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Video players
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Len Ovens l...@ovenwerks.net wrote: I would assume you are using more than one camera if you are taking shots of different instruments all in one take. Unless they are all the same make and model of camera, the sync from audio to video may be different from camera to camera. A visual cue such as a strobe may be a better tool for syncing. Also pay attention to frame rate, though I would guess that if you are happy with things once they are synced this is ok. Different frame rates would of course make sync wander from one end of a video to the other. Ah, no it's me, myself and I playing all the instruments so it's the other kind of one take only. It's a legacy from my audio recording policy to get things moving instead of playing the same part over and over again until I hate the song and never finish recording it. I set the camera, nowadays I actually use an iPhone, play one instrument, one take, one video file. Pick up the next instrument, same camera, one take. And so on. Yes, there is an issue with iPhone deciding itself between 24 and 30 fps depending on lighting. So it's important to use enough lighting for all recordings. For my next project I will buy an app that will lock the frame rate. In any case, it has still been an issue with the waveforms and actually audio in Kdenlive even with the same camera and same frame rate for all video files. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Youtube channel created for Ubuntu Studio - contributors needed to submit tutorials
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:51 PM, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote: About backing music: Google scans all videos uploaded to Youtube for backing music for the RIAA and publishers. They then offer the copythugs the options to silence soundtracks, put ads on the videos, track users, or do nothing. There is no legal requirement for them to do this, as the safe harbor provisions of the DCMA state that 3ed party webhosts need only remove content after getting formal notice to be totally shielded from lawsuits. Google probably feared their size would lead the US Congress to change that law. This was the original reason I left Youtube for Liveleak. Since then the new Google TOS came along to permit browser fingerprinting (added words or device information) so now I won't even connect to any Google server except via Torbrowser, which is designed (via Torbutton) to resist fingerprinting attacks as well as obfuscate the IP address. I understand few here face the security issues I do, but if you use music on Google you risk losing the entire sountrack. Also users of this channel might have issues forming Youtube/Gmail accounts of their own as Google's tracking will show them as already adminsistering and logging into one account-and Google has a real names policy and tries to flag multiple accounts held by any one user. When I read the conversation of background music my mind read it as if the community would create its own music parts. Perhaps I misunderstood. Otherwise there will be a problem with using other artists' music unless it's free. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
LiveFS ubuntustudio/saucy/amd64 failed to build on 20130605
-- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Youtube channel created for Ubuntu Studio - contributors needed to submit tutorials
You can find a lot of free music on jamendo.com. and don't forget to select the right license on YouTube: they allow CC now. Le 5 juin 2013 20:29, Kaj Ailomaa zeque...@mousike.me a écrit : On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 08:23 PM, Jimmy Sjölund wrote: When I read the conversation of background music my mind read it as if the community would create its own music parts. Perhaps I misunderstood. Otherwise there will be a problem with using other artists' music unless it's free. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel Community created music would be the only option for me. Or, at least, it needs to be some sort of free license. But, preferably created by the community. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
