Re: Jaunty status so far.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Susan Cragin wrote: So as of now there's only slight changes. New art has been uploaded. (though still not final) Synfig removed because it was causing a build issue with the disks. -RT is coming along better than before but there's constant developments there. Some people reported good audio results with .28-generic. http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-tuning/2009-February/date.html So, we'll see how things go. 2 new packages we're looking to get in are rtirq and Pencil (vector animation app). We've also dropped Specimen in favor of FontMatrix. It's still unclear as to whether or not we'll be going to JACK 2. Some more notes can be seen here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meeting110109 -Cory K. Has there been anything said about having btrfs as an install option? Just curious. - From the btrfs web page: Btrfs is under heavy development, and is not suitable for any uses other than benchmarking and review. The Btrfs disk format is not yet finalized, but it will only be changed if a critical bug is found and no workarounds are possible. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknYYE0ACgkQwRXgH3rKGfPyYQCgm4KmbJ1rb4VShOyDu4urQcpL U8YAoIgyavnf7/yCTf6n0XdKUrv5xRqm =Z8bG -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Jaunty status so far.
So as of now there's only slight changes. New art has been uploaded. (though still not final) Synfig removed because it was causing a build issue with the disks. -RT is coming along better than before but there's constant developments there. Some people reported good audio results with .28-generic. http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-tuning/2009-February/date.html So, we'll see how things go. 2 new packages we're looking to get in are rtirq and Pencil (vector animation app). We've also dropped Specimen in favor of FontMatrix. It's still unclear as to whether or not we'll be going to JACK 2. Some more notes can be seen here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meeting110109 -Cory K. Has there been anything said about having btrfs as an install option? Just curious. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Jaunty status so far.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Cory K. coryis...@ubuntu.com wrote: So as of now there's only slight changes. New art has been uploaded. (though still not final) Synfig removed because it was causing a build issue with the disks. -RT is coming along better than before but there's constant developments there. Some people reported good audio results with .28-generic. http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-tuning/2009-February/date.html So, we'll see how things go. 2 new packages we're looking to get in are rtirq and Pencil (vector animation app). We've also dropped Specimen in favor of FontMatrix. It's still unclear as to whether or not we'll be going to JACK 2. Some more notes can be seen here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meeting110109 One thing that would be nice to have, if it's at all feasible, is qgtkstyle [1]. It's definitely not a must-have package, but since we use a few qt4 packages in a gnome environment, this would make the desktop look a lot more polished. It's been working fine for me for quite some time. There are packages in my ppa, if anyone feels like trying. ffado, on the other hand, is a must-have ;-) And I'm curious on how things are going with jack-in-main. And I've been wondering whether it would be a good idea to maintain a 2.6.26-rt kernel, particularly if .28 doesn't turn out too well after all. We could be joining efforts with 64studio, for example, when it comes to realtime kernel packaging and maintaining. Judging from one thread I stumbled into [3], it seems they're aiming for a 2.6.26 kernel. Regards, Khash. [1] http://code.google.com/p/qgtkstyle/ [2] http://www.64studio.com/node/904 -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
Re: Jaunty status so far.
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:23:54PM CET, Khashayar Naderehvandi wrote: And I've been wondering whether it would be a good idea to maintain a 2.6.26-rt kernel, particularly if .28 doesn't turn out too well after all. We could be joining efforts with 64studio, for example, when it comes to realtime kernel packaging and maintaining. Judging from one thread I stumbled into [3], it seems they're aiming for a 2.6.26 kernel. The real issue here is hardware suport parity with the generic 2.6.28 kernel in jaunty. Users will find that hardware that they have may work with 2.6.28, but not with 2.6.26. its also very hard to keep restricted modules/DKMS packages working with two different kernel versions as well. I'd rather we really push for 2.6.28, and again if its not usable, have it as an option, but not by default. Luke signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
