Re: RE:Re: live video switching (was: Linux Tools for Serious Photographers)

2012-08-10 Thread Ralf Mardorf
IMO kde libs and qt libs aren't an issue. Rui's apps such as QjackCtl
already need QT and if you wish to use e.g. K3b, you also have to
install kde libs.

Regards,
Ralf


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: RE:Re: live video switching (was: Linux Tools for Serious Photographers)

2012-08-10 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 12:45 -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
 I think there is a reason it is
 hard to find software that can do this stuff, not enough people want it or
 the hardware is just not there yet. I did find a thread where someone was
 looking for such stuff, the responses were all that it was better to get
 hardware, that any of the software solutions showed noticeable lag. So
 computers have gotten faster, but they are still not there yet.

There were several threads where coders like Paul Davis gave some
comments. The coders say, it's impossible to program this software
without a team of many coders that are payed. It already takes a long
time to get Ardour that good as it is today, for video software it would
take much longer.
Ignoring the special video hardware, even for very oldish Apple
computers you already get completely professional software. I don't know
how much the video hardware is.

Regards,
Ralf


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


RE: RE:Re: live video switching (was: Linux Tools for Serious Photographers)

2012-08-09 Thread Luke Kuhn

I was under the impression you were referring to switching PLAYBACK from 
multiple source files, not from multiple running cameras. Kdenlive can take 
input from one  camera, no idea if it can do multiple cameras, as I've only 
used that feature for a webcam. I don't own pro cameras, only the $300 kind, as 
all my activist work is posted under strict no-monetization principles for 
ethical reasons.



 Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 12:45:53 -0700
 From: Len Ovens l...@ovenwerks.net
 To: Ubuntu Studio Development  Technical Discussion
   ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
 Subject: RE:Re: live video switching (was: Linux Tools for Serious 
   Photographers)
 Message-ID:
   95c0a5ca5c6a54386517b20162b35678.squir...@ssl.ovenwerks.net
 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
 
 

clip

 By live switching I mean having two or more
 video streams coming in direct from cameras for example and being able to
 see both streams at the same time as well as the result of the switching
 (that is at least three live views)... probably four to include at least
 one stream from the local drive. The resultant video is then output as
 video that can be broadcast at the same time the incoming video is being
 made. Bonus if the audio can be mixed on the same machine. or at least
 added to the stream. Anything less is editing/VJing.
 clip  -- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


RE:Re: live video switching (was: Linux Tools for Serious Photographers)

2012-08-08 Thread Len Ovens

On Wed, August 8, 2012 8:03 am, Luke Kuhn wrote:

 I didn't know LiVES could do anything like that, as it has to import all
 video files before use. Kdenlive (in repo, and which I use for making

If LiVES has to import first, then the feature of taking live streams was
just another way to import a video file. That is not what I was talking
about. As far as I know, we are not shipping kdenlive this cycle, though
it has been made easier to install. I don't get the idea it does live
video switching/fading either. By live switching I mean having two or more
video streams coming in direct from cameras for example and being able to
see both streams at the same time as well as the result of the switching
(that is at least three live views)... probably four to include at least
one stream from the local drive. The resultant video is then output as
video that can be broadcast at the same time the incoming video is being
made. Bonus if the audio can be mixed on the same machine. or at least
added to the stream. Anything less is editing/VJing.

The thing that I am trying to say however, is that I don't think we need
to worry about finding an app that does that. That kind of work really
can't be done solo. It requires a team of people. A min. of 4 if the
switcher can produce as well, but still need two for camera and one for
audio. I suppose one could get away with two people if one camera is
stationary and the audio is set a little low and there is no need to
transition audio streams. In my opinion the result would be sub-standard.
Normally, seven people would be used.  (even at a place that skimps on
_everything_) The only place I see this being used is in a live setting
for filling large screens behind or to the side of a stage where it was
important to show the performer. We would be getting into specialty
work... a very small group of people and a set of apps we probably can't
test on any of our HW. (anyone have at least a dual video input card as
well as video out?) My machine has trouble giving smooth video from a
cheap webcam... and the video out is way lagged behind the input. I think
live video work would require getting rid of X and handling the video
directly with a video version of jackd. I think there is a reason it is
hard to find software that can do this stuff, not enough people want it or
the hardware is just not there yet. I did find a thread where someone was
looking for such stuff, the responses were all that it was better to get
hardware, that any of the software solutions showed noticeable lag. So
computers have gotten faster, but they are still not there yet.

-- 
Len Ovens
www.OvenWerks.net


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: live video switching (was: Linux Tools for Serious Photographers)

2012-08-07 Thread Len Ovens

On Tue, August 7, 2012 7:13 am, Emmet Hikory wrote:
 Len Ovens wrote:
 I don't find SW to handle 3 or
 more input streams and do on the fly switching. (I think we used closer
 to
 7 or 8 streams... though our switchers had more.. they had access to
 every
 stream in the building)

 Assuming one is either willing to play with *lots* of gstreamer
 pipelines,
 or can pre-cache streams in one way or another, freemix can handle this
 sort
 of thing: I've stood behind someone using it to select video at a club,
 and
 they had multiple streams/previews running locally, switching which was on
 the main screen regularly.

Took a while to find any docs for it... in the doc directory of the src
package. freemix is designed to do live showing switching of videos stored
as file on the computer like a VJ. I don't know if it can connect to a
gstream opened by another app or not. But it is not designed for it. It is
only available as a src package right now.

However, I tried looking up VJ in synaptic and that spit out LiVES,
already in the repos. In it's features page it says Support for live
firewire cameras and TV cards. I don't know that we should ship it by
default, but extra sw yes.

Comments?

-- 
Len Ovens
www.OvenWerks.net


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: live video switching (was: Linux Tools for Serious Photographers)

2012-08-07 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 15:13 -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
 Comments?

Since Linux suffers of no or no serious NLE video cut, there shouldn't
be too much video packages included to an install media.

Regarding to soundtracks, resp. audio productions for videos, I would
welcome http://rg42.org/wiki/a3vtl as a package.


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: live video switching (was: Linux Tools for Serious Photographers)

2012-08-07 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Regarding to a German post Lives seems not to run with 12.04 and there
are packages for

Packages are available for the following releases:
Ubuntu 10.04: 1.4.6-1~getdeb1
Ubuntu 10.10: 1.4.2-1~getdeb1
Ubuntu 9.04: 1.1.5-1~getdeb1
Ubuntu 9.10: 1.2.1-1~getdeb1
Ubuntu 11.04: 1.4.6-1~getdeb1

at http://www.getdeb.net/app/lives

I suspect Cinelerra is uninteresting regarding to IIRC no live streams
and of course license issues?


-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


Re: live video switching (was: Linux Tools for Serious Photographers)

2012-08-07 Thread Emmet Hikory
Len Ovens wrote:
 Took a while to find any docs for it... in the doc directory of the src
 package. freemix is designed to do live showing switching of videos stored
 as file on the computer like a VJ. I don't know if it can connect to a
 gstream opened by another app or not. But it is not designed for it. It is
 only available as a src package right now.

   Ah, indeed: the demo I saw must have either used named pipes or been
a derivative of the sources currently on launchpad (engine.py would need
extension to directly access non-file sources, although it's all gstreamer).
Packaging this source is fairly trivial, if it's considered particularly
useful: it's a clean setup.py and fairly sensibly licensed.

 However, I tried looking up VJ in synaptic and that spit out LiVES,
 already in the repos. In it's features page it says Support for live
 firewire cameras and TV cards. I don't know that we should ship it by
 default, but extra sw yes.

Unless someone can document a sensible video processing workflow
(VJ, broadcasting, etc.) which is known to be well-done with it, I'm
not sure it ought get any more or less attention than any of the other
audio/video tools in the archive that aren't part of known workflows:
while there's *lots* of software in the archive, and all of it is
presumably useful and used by some folk, the more that we attempt to
call supported (even as extra sw), the less I would expect we could
refine the experience to be ideal for accomplishing real tasks.

-- 
Emmet HIKORY

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel