Re: Version update from 10.10 to 11.04 - Is it better to re-build the kernel-rt?
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 13:16 -0600, Gustin Johnson wrote: > At the very least you should recompile the kernel as the version of > GCC changes with each release. This can cause issues if you need to > compile a module against your kernel or if you use binary driver > blobs. Thank you Gustin :) I was thinking of this myself, but OTOH, I wasn't able to build the nvidia driver/modules for current real-time kernels. Btw. the update failed. I'll restore Maverick from the backup archive. I guess it's because of dirty tricks to get the Envy24 work, an pulseaudio issue. - Ralf > > No idea about the rest. > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Ralf wrote: > > After a version upgrade, would it be better to re-build the kernel-rt or > > is using the kernels I build with Maverick ok? What's about a self-build > > jackd from svn etc.? > > > > Hm? 495 new packages? Order of packages isn't sorted by the alphabet, > > hence it's hard to check for issues. The proprietary nvidia driver is > > removed, so I expect Ubuntu not to startup (kernel-generic) after the > > update, regarding to: > > > > $ cat /etc/rcS.d/S69* > > #! /bin/sh > > # /etc/rcS.d/Switch_xorg_conf > > > > rm /etc/X11/xorg.conf > > case $(uname -r) in > >*rt*) > >cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf.nv /etc/X11/xorg.conf > >;; > >*) > >cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf.nvidia /etc/X11/xorg.conf > >;; > > esac > > > > I also wonder what will happen to pulseaudio and envy24 tweaks, my > > desktop theme etc.. > > > > No longer supported by Canonical (8) > >libgnome2-perl > >docbook-xsl-doc-html > >hal-info > >libhal1 > >hal > >libhal-storage1 > >phonon-backend-xine > >smartdimmer > > Remove (7) > >git1.0-glib-2.0 > >libpolkit-qt-1-0 > >libmarblewidget10 > >gnome-user-guide-de > >gnome-user-guide-en > >libgirespository1.0-1 > >libdrm-nouveau1 > > No longer needed (15) > >libwebkit-1.0-common > >libqtscript4-phonon > >libavformat52 > >openoffice.org-style-human > >libwebkit-1.0-2 > >libgladeui-1-9 > >libswscale0 > >libavutil50 > >openoffice.org-core > >libindicator1 > >libimobiledevice1 > >openoffice.org-base-core > >nvidia-current-modaliases > >nvidia-1773-modaliases > >libavcodec52 > > Install (495) > >[snip] > > Upgrade (1655) > >[snip] > > > > Of cause there're two backups and one is brand-new: > > > > $ ls edubuntu*tar.gz -hl > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.6G 2011-04-14 12:58 > > edubuntu_maverick_apr-14-2011.tar.gz > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.7G 2011-05-04 10:45 > > edubuntu_maverick_may-04-2011_stable_midi_daw.tar.gz > > > > ;) Ralf > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list > > Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com > > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users > > > -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Version update from 10.10 to 11.04 - Is it better to re-build the kernel-rt?
At the very least you should recompile the kernel as the version of GCC changes with each release. This can cause issues if you need to compile a module against your kernel or if you use binary driver blobs. No idea about the rest. On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Ralf wrote: > After a version upgrade, would it be better to re-build the kernel-rt or > is using the kernels I build with Maverick ok? What's about a self-build > jackd from svn etc.? > > Hm? 495 new packages? Order of packages isn't sorted by the alphabet, > hence it's hard to check for issues. The proprietary nvidia driver is > removed, so I expect Ubuntu not to startup (kernel-generic) after the > update, regarding to: > > $ cat /etc/rcS.d/S69* > #! /bin/sh > # /etc/rcS.d/Switch_xorg_conf > > rm /etc/X11/xorg.conf > case $(uname -r) in > *rt*) > cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf.nv /etc/X11/xorg.conf > ;; > *) > cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf.nvidia /etc/X11/xorg.conf > ;; > esac > > I also wonder what will happen to pulseaudio and envy24 tweaks, my > desktop theme etc.. > > No longer supported by Canonical (8) > libgnome2-perl > docbook-xsl-doc-html > hal-info > libhal1 > hal > libhal-storage1 > phonon-backend-xine > smartdimmer > Remove (7) > git1.0-glib-2.0 > libpolkit-qt-1-0 > libmarblewidget10 > gnome-user-guide-de > gnome-user-guide-en > libgirespository1.0-1 > libdrm-nouveau1 > No longer needed (15) > libwebkit-1.0-common > libqtscript4-phonon > libavformat52 > openoffice.org-style-human > libwebkit-1.0-2 > libgladeui-1-9 > libswscale0 > libavutil50 > openoffice.org-core > libindicator1 > libimobiledevice1 > openoffice.org-base-core > nvidia-current-modaliases > nvidia-1773-modaliases > libavcodec52 > Install (495) > [snip] > Upgrade (1655) > [snip] > > Of cause there're two backups and one is brand-new: > > $ ls edubuntu*tar.gz -hl > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.6G 2011-04-14 12:58 > edubuntu_maverick_apr-14-2011.tar.gz > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.7G 2011-05-04 10:45 > edubuntu_maverick_may-04-2011_stable_midi_daw.tar.gz > > ;) Ralf > > > > > -- > Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list > Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users > -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Version update from 10.10 to 11.04 - Is it better to re-build the kernel-rt?
After a version upgrade, would it be better to re-build the kernel-rt or is using the kernels I build with Maverick ok? What's about a self-build jackd from svn etc.? Hm? 495 new packages? Order of packages isn't sorted by the alphabet, hence it's hard to check for issues. The proprietary nvidia driver is removed, so I expect Ubuntu not to startup (kernel-generic) after the update, regarding to: $ cat /etc/rcS.d/S69* #! /bin/sh # /etc/rcS.d/Switch_xorg_conf rm /etc/X11/xorg.conf case $(uname -r) in *rt*) cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf.nv /etc/X11/xorg.conf ;; *) cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf.nvidia /etc/X11/xorg.conf ;; esac I also wonder what will happen to pulseaudio and envy24 tweaks, my desktop theme etc.. No longer supported by Canonical (8) libgnome2-perl docbook-xsl-doc-html hal-info libhal1 hal libhal-storage1 phonon-backend-xine smartdimmer Remove (7) git1.0-glib-2.0 libpolkit-qt-1-0 libmarblewidget10 gnome-user-guide-de gnome-user-guide-en libgirespository1.0-1 libdrm-nouveau1 No longer needed (15) libwebkit-1.0-common libqtscript4-phonon libavformat52 openoffice.org-style-human libwebkit-1.0-2 libgladeui-1-9 libswscale0 libavutil50 openoffice.org-core libindicator1 libimobiledevice1 openoffice.org-base-core nvidia-current-modaliases nvidia-1773-modaliases libavcodec52 Install (495) [snip] Upgrade (1655) [snip] Of cause there're two backups and one is brand-new: $ ls edubuntu*tar.gz -hl -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.6G 2011-04-14 12:58 edubuntu_maverick_apr-14-2011.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.7G 2011-05-04 10:45 edubuntu_maverick_may-04-2011_stable_midi_daw.tar.gz ;) Ralf -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Kernel-rt issues solved, but configuring X still is a PITA
On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 23:56 +0100, Gerhard Lang wrote: > Hi Ralf, > nvidia prop drivers for your card never will build with new > rt-kernels. I see you compile customized kernels. I'd recommend trying > 2.3.36.xxx and even 2.6.37-rcxx with preempt settings. They run here on > a geriatric amd64x2 machine under lucid (10.04) ubuntustudio/kx mashing > with proprietary nvidia drivers, full rt support. Only missing against > rt-kernels is the possibility to adjust rtirq settings which as I see > *possibly* *might* give *a* *little* benefit *only* for ffado/firewire > devices. Nevertheless I hope someone will implemet this rtirq tweaking > stuff into mainline kernels. > Regards Gerhard Hi Gerhard :) kernel 2.6.31.6-rt19 + the proprietary nvidia driver is ok for my Suse 11.2 install and my GeForce 7200 GS (GeForce 7300 SE). I could test this kernel-rt, if needed. I don't categorically need the proprietary driver for Ubuntu Studio too, but I wish to have the monitor's resolution settings for any WM and the GDM login menu, a problem that should be independent from the used driver. I'm wary of non-kernels-rt, because I fear worsening MIDI jitter for PCI MIDI. I get best results for my 2 Envy24 PCI MIDI devices and even for my USB MIDI device, when running alsa-midi-latency-test, but I'm used to hard real-time by the C64 and Atari ST + SMPTE sync to analog tape and not fine with so called 'less' MIDI jitter by Linux. When using HPET (HRTIMER) it might be, that it could be able to fix this, but only if I can keep the audio latency as short as possible, because there is a correlation between audio recordings of external MIDI equipment and MIDI jitter. I never compared just PREEMPT and PREEMPT RT. At http://www.rncbc.org/jack/ Rui's version of rtirq still is rtirq-20090920.tar.gz , should be equal to 20090920-0ubuntu1. I never noticed any different between rtirq installed and customized and not being installed or not being customized. Thank you, I had issues regarding to the graphics with kernels-rt ex 2.6.31.6-rt19, but can't remember of what kind exactly. Cheers! Ralf -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Kernel-rt issues solved, but configuring X still is a PITA
Hi Ralf, nvidia prop drivers for your card never will build with new rt-kernels. I see you compile customized kernels. I'd recommend trying 2.3.36.xxx and even 2.6.37-rcxx with preempt settings. They run here on a geriatric amd64x2 machine under lucid (10.04) ubuntustudio/kx mashing with proprietary nvidia drivers, full rt support. Only missing against rt-kernels is the possibility to adjust rtirq settings which as I see *possibly* *might* give *a* *little* benefit *only* for ffado/firewire devices. Nevertheless I hope someone will implemet this rtirq tweaking stuff into mainline kernels. Regards Gerhard Am 27.12.2010 22:37, schrieb Ralf: > Hi :) > > I build a kernel-rt for an upgraded Ubuntu Studio 10.04 Lucid, testing > a knack still to get an initrd, when building it by make-kpkg. This > mail is on HTML to enable copy and paste. > > SOLVED > > I now can build an initrd for self build kernels. > I now can start a kernel-rt from the repositories. > > NEW AND UNSOLVED ISSUE > > The monitor resolution for the GDM login menu is 'broken'. > > ### Preparing to build the kernel > > $ cd /usr/src > $ ls linux -l > lrwxrwxrwx 1 spinymouse src 19 2010-10-03 02:39 linux -> > linux-2.6.33.7-rt29 > $ rm linux > $ ln -s linux-2.6.33.7.2-rt30 linux > $ wget > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.33.7.tar.bz2 > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/patch-2.6.33.7.2-rt30.bz2 > > > ### Extracting the sources and patching the kernel > > $ tar xjf linux-2.6.33.7.tar.bz2 > $ rm linux-2.6.33.7.tar.bz2 > $ mv linux-2.6.33.7 linux-2.6.33.7.2-rt30 > $ cd linux > $ bunzip2 ../patch-2.6.33.7.2-rt30.bz2 > $ patch -p1 < ../patch-2.6.33.7.2-rt30 > $ rm ../patch-2.6.33.7.2-rt30 > > > ### Editing a configuration > > $ uname -a > Linux ubuntu 2.6.32-27-preempt #49-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Thu Dec 2 > 03:21:34 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux > $ cp /boot/config-$(uname -r) .config > $ make oldconfig > Pushing enter only. > > > ### Disabling staging, without testing if it's needed to to disable it > for building the current kernel > > $ gedit .config > Editing > CONFIG_STAGING=y > to > # CONFIG_STAGING is not set > $ make oldconfig > Nothing to do. > > > ### Building the kernel > > $ make-kpkg clean > $ export CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=2 > $ make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot --initrd kernel-image kernel-headers > kernel-source > > > ### Unfortunately there wasn't enough free disk space when I first > build the kernel. > > OT: Btw. is there a list of apps that can be removed from Ubuntu > Studio, without getting issues? I e.g. don't need AppAmor, Firewalls > etc. and especially I would like to get rid of PulseAudio. [End OT] > > > ### After removing some old kernel stuff and the already new build > image and headers, I build the kernel again, but I guess it would have > been ok, if I just would have installed the image and headers, because > only the unneeded source was missing. I also think, that not running > 'make-kpkg clean' again, would have made the repeated compiling > faster, but I dunno. > > $ rm -r ../*rt29* > $ rm ../linux-h* ../linux-i* > $ make-kpkg clean > $ echo $CONCURRENCY_LEVEL > 2 > $ make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot --initrd kernel-image kernel-headers > kernel-source > $ sudo dpkg -i > ../linux-image-2.6.33.7.2-rt30_2.6.33.7.2-rt30-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb > $ ls -hAl /boot > total 21M > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 632K 2010-12-02 07:02 abi-2.6.32-27-preempt > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 109K 2010-12-02 07:02 config-2.6.32-27-preempt > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 108K 2010-12-27 18:47 config-2.6.33.7.2-rt30 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 12K 2010-12-27 20:07 grub > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8.0M 2010-12-27 09:28 initrd.img-2.6.32-27-preempt > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 157K 2010-03-23 10:40 memtest86+.bin > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.1M 2010-12-02 07:02 System.map-2.6.32-27-preempt > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.1M 2010-12-27 19:52 System.map-2.6.33.7.2-rt30 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.4K 2010-12-02 07:08 vmcoreinfo-2.6.32-27-preempt > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4.0M 2010-12-02 07:02 vmlinuz-2.6.32-27-preempt > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4.0M 2010-12-27 19:52 vmlinuz-2.6.33.7.2-rt30 > > > ### The knack > > $ sudo update-initramfs -c -k 2.6.33.7.2-rt30 > > FWIW it took 77 minutes + less but 48 seconds on my machine to compile > the kernel and 5.45 GiB to build and install the kernel + initrd. > > $ ls -hAl /boot > total 30M > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 632K 2010-12-02 07:02 abi-2.6.32-27-preempt > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 109K 2010-12-02 07:02 config-2.6.32-27-preempt > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 108K 2010-12-27 18:47 config-2.6.33.
Kernel-rt issues solved, but configuring X still is a PITA
Hi :) I build a kernel-rt for an upgraded Ubuntu Studio 10.04 Lucid, testing a knack still to get an initrd, when building it by make-kpkg. This mail is on HTML to enable copy and paste. SOLVED I now can build an initrd for self build kernels. I now can start a kernel-rt from the repositories. NEW AND UNSOLVED ISSUE The monitor resolution for the GDM login menu is 'broken'. ### Preparing to build the kernel $ cd /usr/src $ ls linux -l lrwxrwxrwx 1 spinymouse src 19 2010-10-03 02:39 linux -> linux-2.6.33.7-rt29 $ rm linux $ ln -s linux-2.6.33.7.2-rt30 linux $ wget ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.33.7.tar.bz2 http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/patch-2.6.33.7.2-rt30.bz2 ### Extracting the sources and patching the kernel $ tar xjf linux-2.6.33.7.tar.bz2 $ rm linux-2.6.33.7.tar.bz2 $ mv linux-2.6.33.7 linux-2.6.33.7.2-rt30 $ cd linux $ bunzip2 ../patch-2.6.33.7.2-rt30.bz2 $ patch -p1 < ../patch-2.6.33.7.2-rt30 $ rm ../patch-2.6.33.7.2-rt30 ### Editing a configuration $ uname -a Linux ubuntu 2.6.32-27-preempt #49-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Thu Dec 2 03:21:34 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ cp /boot/config-$(uname -r) .config $ make oldconfig Pushing enter only. ### Disabling staging, without testing if it's needed to to disable it for building the current kernel $ gedit .config Editing CONFIG_STAGING=y to # CONFIG_STAGING is not set $ make oldconfig Nothing to do. ### Building the kernel $ make-kpkg clean $ export CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=2 $ make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot --initrd kernel-image kernel-headers kernel-source ### Unfortunately there wasn't enough free disk space when I first build the kernel. OT: Btw. is there a list of apps that can be removed from Ubuntu Studio, without getting issues? I e.g. don't need AppAmor, Firewalls etc. and especially I would like to get rid of PulseAudio. [End OT] ### After removing some old kernel stuff and the already new build image and headers, I build the kernel again, but I guess it would have been ok, if I just would have installed the image and headers, because only the unneeded source was missing. I also think, that not running 'make-kpkg clean' again, would have made the repeated compiling faster, but I dunno. $ rm -r ../*rt29* $ rm ../linux-h* ../linux-i* $ make-kpkg clean $ echo $CONCURRENCY_LEVEL 2 $ make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot --initrd kernel-image kernel-headers kernel-source $ sudo dpkg -i ../linux-image-2.6.33.7.2-rt30_2.6.33.7.2-rt30-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb $ ls -hAl /boot total 21M -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 632K 2010-12-02 07:02 abi-2.6.32-27-preempt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 109K 2010-12-02 07:02 config-2.6.32-27-preempt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 108K 2010-12-27 18:47 config-2.6.33.7.2-rt30 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 12K 2010-12-27 20:07 grub -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8.0M 2010-12-27 09:28 initrd.img-2.6.32-27-preempt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 157K 2010-03-23 10:40 memtest86+.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.1M 2010-12-02 07:02 System.map-2.6.32-27-preempt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.1M 2010-12-27 19:52 System.map-2.6.33.7.2-rt30 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.4K 2010-12-02 07:08 vmcoreinfo-2.6.32-27-preempt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4.0M 2010-12-02 07:02 vmlinuz-2.6.32-27-preempt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4.0M 2010-12-27 19:52 vmlinuz-2.6.33.7.2-rt30 ### The knack $ sudo update-initramfs -c -k 2.6.33.7.2-rt30 FWIW it took 77 minutes + less but 48 seconds on my machine to compile the kernel and 5.45 GiB to build and install the kernel + initrd. $ ls -hAl /boot total 30M -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 632K 2010-12-02 07:02 abi-2.6.32-27-preempt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 109K 2010-12-02 07:02 config-2.6.32-27-preempt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 108K 2010-12-27 18:47 config-2.6.33.7.2-rt30 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 12K 2010-12-27 20:07 grub -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8.0M 2010-12-27 09:28 initrd.img-2.6.32-27-preempt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8.2M 2010-12-27 20:12 initrd.img-2.6.33.7.2-rt30 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 157K 2010-03-23 10:40 memtest86+.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.1M 2010-12-02 07:02 System.map-2.6.32-27-preempt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.1M 2010-12-27 19:52 System.map-2.6.33.7.2-rt30 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.4K 2010-12-02 07:08 vmcoreinfo-2.6.32-27-preempt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4.0M 2010-12-02 07:02 vmlinuz-2.6.32-27-preempt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4.0M 2010-12-27 19:52 vmlinuz-2.6.33.7.2-rt30 It's needed to add the initrd line to /boot/grub/grub.cfg. Startup stopped, when I tried 'sudo startx' in tty1 I got 'Module nouveau not found'. Because of a missing xorg.conf I copied the xorg.conf from my 64 Studio 3.0. I didn't test 'sudo gdm start', but I needed nothing to do for launching X after I copied the xorg.conf. $ sudo cp /media/studio3.0/etc/X11/xorg.conf /etc/X11/xorg.conf Additionally I needed to set up the monitor preferences by the GUI to the wanted resolution, unfortunately it's only ok for the desktop, but not für the GDM login menu. For 64 Studio 3.0 Hardy it
Re: kernel RT 2.6.33 and last fglrx update
Le 08/11/2010 08:22, Alessio Igor Bogani a écrit : > Hi Laurent, > > 2010/11/8 Bellegarde Laurent: > [...] > >> I'm gonna make a complete demo of Ubuntu Studio possibility to the public, in >> Toulouse, France, next 20 of november. >> > [...] > > That is very great! > > Could you provide in case your presentation documents (slides, demo, > video or other things produced for that presentation), please ? > > Scott@ > That type of things should go in studio website! > > Ciao, > Alessio > Yes, no trouble, as soon as the files have been finish to be prepared ;-) In few days...I'm close. For my demo, I wish not to take with me my laptop Asus with 4 Go and ati radeon, PIV dual core... but more funny, my netbook, asus 900. I've tested it since an hour with alessio 2.6.33-29 RT pae, the computer have a celeron 900 MHz, mono-core, 1 Go of ram, a integrated sound card intel, video graphic card intel. With a latency of 11,6 ms, i'm running jackd, hydrogen, vlc, jackeq, jackrack, ardour in a live demo together without any x-runs !!! Alessio's 2.6.33-29 RT is to my mind the best ever build RT kernel in Ubuntu studio...and in Lucid, it's a marvellous association... I know now many people who are going to be suprised that a so small and old computer could do !!! As i'm able to edit video with it, with kino, openshot, kdenlive, cinelerra in pretty good condition in DV resolution and short demo in HD720 !!! next is coming, congratulation Alessio for your work :-D Laurent -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: kernel RT 2.6.33 and last fglrx update
Hi Laurent, 2010/11/8 Bellegarde Laurent : [...] > I'm gonna make a complete demo of Ubuntu Studio possibility to the public, in > Toulouse, France, next 20 of november. [...] That is very great! Could you provide in case your presentation documents (slides, demo, video or other things produced for that presentation), please ? Scott@ That type of things should go in studio website! Ciao, Alessio -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: kernel RT 2.6.33 and last fglrx update
Selon Alessio Igor Bogani : > Hi Laurent, > > 2010/11/5 laurent.bellegarde : > > Under lucid amd 64, kernel 2.6.33 RT from Alessio ppa, the last fglrx > > update coming from ppa and named 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu6 ppa1 is unable to > > Removed. Sorry for inconvenience. > > Ciao, > Alessio Hi Alessio. That's debugging... I've restored my system with deselecting fglrx, the system repair alone the xorg.conf with the 2D ati free driver. When i need the 3D ati driver, i install again the lucid-update one. I've tested the 2.6.33 RT a lot with hydrogen, zynaddsubfx, vlc and several others music software, no crash, no x-runs with my "little" integrated via sound card with a 11.6 ms latency... I'm gonna make a complete demo of Ubuntu Studio possibility to the public, in Toulouse, France, next 20 of november. Bye, Laurent > -- > Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list > Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users > Bellegarde Laurent, Professeur de SVT, laurent.bellega...@free.fr Lycée Louis de Foix, Bayonne, 64, France, Euskadi video libre : www.lprod.org ; Association : www.euskalug.org -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: kernel RT 2.6.33 and last fglrx update
Hi Laurent, 2010/11/5 laurent.bellegarde : > Under lucid amd 64, kernel 2.6.33 RT from Alessio ppa, the last fglrx > update coming from ppa and named 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu6 ppa1 is unable to Removed. Sorry for inconvenience. Ciao, Alessio -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
kernel RT 2.6.33 and last fglrx update
Hi all, Under lucid amd 64, kernel 2.6.33 RT from Alessio ppa, the last fglrx update coming from ppa and named 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu6 ppa1 is unable to boot properly, with, a large crash of X, the screen is black and nothing is impossible to do, even getting a terminal on tty2...so hard reboot the fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu5 (lucid updates) and 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu3 (lucid) were working perfectly with this kernel. Laurent -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Missing initrd when building a kernel-rt
Jeremy, 2010/10/4 Jeremy Jongepier : >> Ubuntu don't support make-pkg. [...] > As of which release? I've built several kernels with make-kpkg for 9.04 > and 9.10 (to include dsdt tables for my netbook). Haven't tried with > 10.04 though. I don't recall when make-kpkg started to create problems but you can notice that neither Ubuntu Kernel Team Wiki (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/) nor Ubuntu kernel packaging contains any reference to make-kpkg. Moreover the package which contains that utility (that is kernel-package) is in universe so that should be an evident sign. Feel free to use what do you want but keep in mind that isn't the official Ubuntu way to build a kernel (so it is unsupported). Ciao, Alessio -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Missing initrd when building a kernel-rt
On 10/04/2010 10:40 AM, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote: > 2010/10/4 Jeremy Jongepier : >> On 10/03/2010 07:41 AM, Ralf wrote: >>> spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot --initrd >> >> Hmm, and what if you try fakeroot make-kpg --initrd kernel-image >> kernel-headers kernel-source ? Shouldn't make a difference though I think. > > Ubuntu don't support make-pkg. > > Ciao, > Alessio > Hello Alessio, As of which release? I've built several kernels with make-kpkg for 9.04 and 9.10 (to include dsdt tables for my netbook). Haven't tried with 10.04 though. Best, Jeremy -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Missing initrd when building a kernel-rt
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 11:07 +0200, Jeremy Jongepier wrote: > On 10/04/2010 10:40 AM, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote: > > 2010/10/4 Jeremy Jongepier : > >> On 10/03/2010 07:41 AM, Ralf wrote: > >>> spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot --initrd > >> > >> Hmm, and what if you try fakeroot make-kpg --initrd kernel-image > >> kernel-headers kernel-source ? Shouldn't make a difference though I think. > > > > Ubuntu don't support make-pkg. > > > > Ciao, > > Alessio > > > > Hello Alessio, > > As of which release? I've built several kernels with make-kpkg for 9.04 > and 9.10 (to include dsdt tables for my netbook). Haven't tried with > 10.04 though. > > Best, > > Jeremy I did read all emails and will reply later this day or tomorrow, the flu I've got is a PITA, I can't stay long on the computer ;). But this is very important. 'make-kpkg' did build: spinymouse1...@suse11-2:~> ls /media/ubuntu_studio/usr/src/linux* /media/ubuntu_studio/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.33.7-rt29_2.6.33.7-rt29-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb /media/ubuntu_studio/usr/src/linux-image-2.6.33.7-rt29_2.6.33.7-rt29-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb /media/ubuntu_studio/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.33.7-rt29_2.6.33.7-rt29-10.00.Custom_all.deb It's just that initrd isn't included to linux-image-2.6.33.7-rt29_2.6.33.7-rt29-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb. How should a kernel be build for Ubuntu today? Cheers! Ralf -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Missing initrd when building a kernel-rt
2010/10/4 Jeremy Jongepier : > On 10/03/2010 07:41 AM, Ralf wrote: >> spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot --initrd > > Hmm, and what if you try fakeroot make-kpg --initrd kernel-image > kernel-headers kernel-source ? Shouldn't make a difference though I think. Ubuntu don't support make-pkg. Ciao, Alessio -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Missing initrd when building a kernel-rt
On 10/03/2010 07:41 AM, Ralf wrote: > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot --initrd Hmm, and what if you try fakeroot make-kpg --initrd kernel-image kernel-headers kernel-source ? Shouldn't make a difference though I think. Best, Jeremy -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Missing initrd when building a kernel-rt
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 11:07 +0200, Jeremy Jongepier wrote: > On 10/04/2010 10:40 AM, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote: > > 2010/10/4 Jeremy Jongepier : > >> On 10/03/2010 07:41 AM, Ralf wrote: > >>> spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot --initrd > >> > >> Hmm, and what if you try fakeroot make-kpg --initrd kernel-image > >> kernel-headers kernel-source ? Shouldn't make a difference though I think. > > > > Ubuntu don't support make-pkg. > > > > Ciao, > > Alessio > > > > Hello Alessio, > > As of which release? I've built several kernels with make-kpkg for 9.04 > and 9.10 (to include dsdt tables for my netbook). Haven't tried with > 10.04 though. > > Best, > > Jeremy Jeremy, I did compile with make-kpkg for Hardy 8.04, resp. 64 Studio 3.0 - beta, based on Hardy and it did work. If you should have got the time to do it, would you please try to test, if there won't be an initrd for you too, building on Lucid or later version of Ubuntu? Copy and paste should be ok, if you allow HTML for received messages ;). wget ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.33.7.tar.bz2 http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/patch-2.6.33.7-rt29.bz2 tar xvjf linux-2.6.33.7.tar.bz2 mv linux-2.6.33.7 linux-2.6.33.7-rt29 ln -s linux-2.6.33.7-rt29 linux cd linux mv ../patch-2.6.33.7-rt29.bz2 ../linux bunzip2 patch-2.6.33.7-rt29.bz2 patch -p1 < patch-2.6.33.7-rt29 If uname -r is 2.6.32-25-preempt, than ... cp /boot/config-$(uname -r) .config make oldconfig ... should need to push enter all the times only. I guess it's needed to disable staging on any machine, so ... gedit .config Editing CONFIG_STAGING=y to # CONFIG_STAGING is not set ... and then make oldconfig There should be nothing to do when running make oldconfig. make-kpkg clean make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot --initrd kernel-image kernel-headers kernel-source or perhaps fakeroot first. -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Missing initrd when building a kernel-rt
Thank you for the information Brian :). On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 21:58 -0400, Mike Holstein wrote: > i know there are a lot of suggestions going around, but have you tried > falks PPA? and the kernels that are in there? > > > ALSO you could try a custom xorg.conf file that forces vesa... > > > im pretty confident that the RT issue is nvidia related... > > > im my 64bit box with nvidia i had simlar issues... As the day progresses I'll copy an xorg.conf from one of my 64 Studio installs and try to boot a real-time kernel from the repositories again. Thank you Mike :). -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Missing initrd when building a kernel-rt
i know there are a lot of suggestions going around, but have you tried falks PPA? and the kernels that are in there? ALSO you could try a custom xorg.conf file that forces vesa... im pretty confident that the RT issue is nvidia related... im my 64bit box with nvidia i had simlar issues... On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 11:53 -0400, Mike Holstein wrote: > > another easy trouble-shooting step would be to download KXstudio, run > > it live, and see if you can get to the desktop, and see if you can > > boot the -realtime kernel, see what graphics driver is being used, and > > what kernel version... > > I've seen no option to choose a kernel for live usage of > KXStudio_10.04.2-LiveDVD_64bit. > The default kernel is a generic kernel. > > ubu...@ubuntu:/etc/X11$ uname -a > Linux ubuntu 2.6.32-21-generic #32-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 16 08:09:38 UTC > 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > Apart from that, which file gives information about the used driver? > > TIA Ralf > > > -- > Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list > Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users > -- MH http://www.myspace.com/mikeholstein http://opensourcemusician.libsyn.com/ -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Missing initrd when building a kernel-rt
On Sunday, October 03, 2010 08:43:10 pm Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 11:53 -0400, Mike Holstein wrote: > > another easy trouble-shooting step would be to download KXstudio, run > > it live, and see if you can get to the desktop, and see if you can > > boot the -realtime kernel, see what graphics driver is being used, and > > what kernel version... > > I've seen no option to choose a kernel for live usage of > KXStudio_10.04.2-LiveDVD_64bit. > The default kernel is a generic kernel. > > ubu...@ubuntu:/etc/X11$ uname -a > Linux ubuntu 2.6.32-21-generic #32-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 16 08:09:38 UTC > 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > Apart from that, which file gives information about the used driver? > > TIA Ralf I think it happens in the KXStudio setup wizard on first boot. There is a dialog to install extra software, including a lowlatency kernel and realtime kernel. After instal this menu can be found by going to the menu, system settings, and open KXStudio Settings. On the 'Additional Software' tab you can check boxes to install the audio geared kernel. :) -Brian -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Missing initrd when building a kernel-rt
On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 11:53 -0400, Mike Holstein wrote: > another easy trouble-shooting step would be to download KXstudio, run > it live, and see if you can get to the desktop, and see if you can > boot the -realtime kernel, see what graphics driver is being used, and > what kernel version... I've seen no option to choose a kernel for live usage of KXStudio_10.04.2-LiveDVD_64bit. The default kernel is a generic kernel. ubu...@ubuntu:/etc/X11$ uname -a Linux ubuntu 2.6.32-21-generic #32-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 16 08:09:38 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux Apart from that, which file gives information about the used driver? TIA Ralf -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: Missing initrd when building a kernel-rt
On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 11:53 -0400, Mike Holstein wrote: > ralf, if it is a simple procedure to enable the ATI graphics chip, i > think that would be a helpful troubleshooting step... as far as i > know, in this PPA https://launchpad.net/~falk-t-j/+archive/lucid , > falktx has patched abogani's realtime kernel with the patches > necessary to utilize the proprietary nvidia drivers... i use the PPA > purge feature in ubuntutweak when testing a PPA with so many different > packages in it... another easy trouble-shooting step would be to > download KXstudio, run it live, and see if you can get to the desktop, > and see if you can boot the -realtime kernel, see what graphics driver > is being used, and what kernel version... Hi Mike, downloading KXstudio is started. The ATI graphics on Linux is a PITA, that's why I switched to the NVidia card and I don't wish to switch back again. For the ATI I never got 3D support working on Linux, for the NVidia it depends to the used Linux, but even if I don't need 3D, since some years X is PITA regarding to set up frequencies and resolution for the monitors I used, resp. for the one I'm using now. For each Linux install I need to set up X by trial and error. Anyway, searching the web, I didn't find any information about the reason, that I don't get an initrd when building a kernel. Doing it the way I tried to do it for Ubuntu Studio does work for 64 Studio Hardy. I wonder what's different for Ubuntu Studio Lucid. Maybe I'll switch to Arch or Gentoo, because Ubuntu and Suse become more and more inscrutable for me. *waiting for the download, still 16 minutes to wait* Ralf > > On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Ralf > wrote: > Hi all :) > > building a kernel-rt failed. This are the steps I did: > > ### Downloading the kernel sources > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ wget > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.33.7.tar.bz2 > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/patch-2.6.33.7-rt29.bz2 > > ### Extracting the sources and patching the kernel > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ tar xvjf linux-2.6.33.7.tar.bz2 > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ rm linux-2.6.33.7.tar.bz2 > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ mv linux-2.6.33.7 > linux-2.6.33.7-rt29 > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ ln -s linux-2.6.33.7-rt29 linux > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ cd linux > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ > mv ../patch-2.6.33.7-rt29.bz2 ../linux > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ bunzip2 > patch-2.6.33.7-rt29.bz2 > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ patch -p1 < > patch-2.6.33.7-rt29 > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ rm patch-2.6.33.7-rt29 > > ### Editing a configuration > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ uname -r > 2.6.32-25-preempt > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ cp /boot/config-$(uname > -r) .config > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make oldconfig > Pushing enter only. > > ### Disable staging > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ gedit .config > Editing > CONFIG_STAGING=y > to > # CONFIG_STAGING is not set > > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make oldconfig > Nothing to do. > > ### Tidying up > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make-kpkg clean > > ### Building the kernel > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ export CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=2 > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot > --initrd kernel-image kernel-headers kernel-source > > ### First trial failed because of two kinds of errors I got > several times > tar: [...]: Cannot open: No such file or directory > tar: vmlinux: Cannot write: No space left on device > > ### Creating space > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ sudo -i > r...@ubuntu:~# synaptic > Completely removed the following packages: > linux-headers-2.6.32-23 > linux-headers-2.6.32-23-preempt > linux-image-2.6.31-10-rt > linux-image-2.6.31-11-rt > linux-image-2.6.32-23-preempt > linux-image-2.6.32-24-preempt > linux-image-2.6.33-23-realtime > linux-image-2.6.33-29-realtime > linux-image-2.6.33.5-rt23 > linux-image-rt > r...@ubuntu:~# rm -r /usr/src/linux-2.6.33.5-rt23 > r...@ubuntu:~# > rm > /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.33.5-rt23_2.6.33.5-rt23-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb >
Re: Missing initrd when building a kernel-rt
ralf, if it is a simple procedure to enable the ATI graphics chip, i think that would be a helpful troubleshooting step... as far as i know, in this PPA https://launchpad.net/~falk-t-j/+archive/lucid , falktx has patched abogani's realtime kernel with the patches necessary to utilize the proprietary nvidia drivers... i use the PPA purge feature in ubuntutweak when testing a PPA with so many different packages in it... another easy trouble-shooting step would be to download KXstudio, run it live, and see if you can get to the desktop, and see if you can boot the -realtime kernel, see what graphics driver is being used, and what kernel version... On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Ralf wrote: > Hi all :) > > building a kernel-rt failed. This are the steps I did: > > ### Downloading the kernel sources > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ wget > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.33.7.tar.bz2 > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/patch-2.6.33.7-rt29.bz2 > > ### Extracting the sources and patching the kernel > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ tar xvjf linux-2.6.33.7.tar.bz2 > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ rm linux-2.6.33.7.tar.bz2 > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ mv linux-2.6.33.7 linux-2.6.33.7-rt29 > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ ln -s linux-2.6.33.7-rt29 linux > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ cd linux > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ mv ../patch-2.6.33.7-rt29.bz2 ../linux > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ bunzip2 patch-2.6.33.7-rt29.bz2 > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ patch -p1 < patch-2.6.33.7-rt29 > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ rm patch-2.6.33.7-rt29 > > ### Editing a configuration > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ uname -r > 2.6.32-25-preempt > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ cp /boot/config-$(uname -r) .config > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make oldconfig > Pushing enter only. > > ### Disable staging > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ gedit .config > Editing > CONFIG_STAGING=y > to > # CONFIG_STAGING is not set > > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make oldconfig > Nothing to do. > > ### Tidying up > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make-kpkg clean > > ### Building the kernel > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ export CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=2 > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot --initrd > kernel-image kernel-headers kernel-source > > ### First trial failed because of two kinds of errors I got several times > tar: [...]: Cannot open: No such file or directory > tar: vmlinux: Cannot write: No space left on device > > ### Creating space > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ sudo -i > r...@ubuntu:~# synaptic > Completely removed the following packages: > linux-headers-2.6.32-23 > linux-headers-2.6.32-23-preempt > linux-image-2.6.31-10-rt > linux-image-2.6.31-11-rt > linux-image-2.6.32-23-preempt > linux-image-2.6.32-24-preempt > linux-image-2.6.33-23-realtime > linux-image-2.6.33-29-realtime > linux-image-2.6.33.5-rt23 > linux-image-rt > r...@ubuntu:~# rm -r /usr/src/linux-2.6.33.5-rt23 > r...@ubuntu:~# rm > /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.33.5-rt23_2.6.33.5-rt23-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb > r...@ubuntu:~# rm > /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.33.7-rt29_2.6.33.7-rt29-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb > r...@ubuntu:~# rm > /usr/src/linux-image-2.6.33.5-rt23_2.6.33.5-rt23-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb > r...@ubuntu:~# rm > /usr/src/linux-image-2.6.33.7-rt29_2.6.33.7-rt29-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb > r...@ubuntu:~# rm > /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.33.5-rt23_2.6.33.5-rt23-10.00.Custom_all.deb > r...@ubuntu:~# rm /boot/grub/grub.cfg_Oct* > r...@ubuntu:~# gparted > There now should be enough free space. > r...@ubuntu:~# logout > > ### Checking if everything still is ok > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make oldconfig > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ echo $CONCURRENCY_LEVEL > Everything is ok. > > ### Tidying up > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make-kpkg clean > > ### Building the kernel > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot --initrd > kernel-image kernel-headers kernel-source > :) > > Didn't run 'make-kpkg clean', if something should be needed for debugging. > > ### Installing the image > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ cd .. > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ sudo dpkg -i > linux-image-2.6.33.7-rt29_2.6.33.7-rt29-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ sudo gedit /boot/grub/grub.cfg > > ### I didn't try to boot he kernel ... > because there's no initrd. > > spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ ls /boot -hAl > total 21M > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 632K 2010-09-18 02:35 abi-2.6.32-25-preempt > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 109K 2010-09-18 02:35 config-2.6.32-25-preempt > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 108K 2010-10-03 04:53 c
Missing initrd when building a kernel-rt
Hi all :) building a kernel-rt failed. This are the steps I did: ### Downloading the kernel sources spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ wget ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.33.7.tar.bz2 http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/patch-2.6.33.7-rt29.bz2 ### Extracting the sources and patching the kernel spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ tar xvjf linux-2.6.33.7.tar.bz2 spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ rm linux-2.6.33.7.tar.bz2 spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ mv linux-2.6.33.7 linux-2.6.33.7-rt29 spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ ln -s linux-2.6.33.7-rt29 linux spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ cd linux spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ mv ../patch-2.6.33.7-rt29.bz2 ../linux spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ bunzip2 patch-2.6.33.7-rt29.bz2 spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ patch -p1 < patch-2.6.33.7-rt29 spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ rm patch-2.6.33.7-rt29 ### Editing a configuration spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ uname -r 2.6.32-25-preempt spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ cp /boot/config-$(uname -r) .config spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make oldconfig Pushing enter only. ### Disable staging spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ gedit .config Editing CONFIG_STAGING=y to # CONFIG_STAGING is not set spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make oldconfig Nothing to do. ### Tidying up spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make-kpkg clean ### Building the kernel spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ export CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=2 spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot --initrd kernel-image kernel-headers kernel-source ### First trial failed because of two kinds of errors I got several times tar: [...]: Cannot open: No such file or directory tar: vmlinux: Cannot write: No space left on device ### Creating space spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ sudo -i r...@ubuntu:~# synaptic Completely removed the following packages: linux-headers-2.6.32-23 linux-headers-2.6.32-23-preempt linux-image-2.6.31-10-rt linux-image-2.6.31-11-rt linux-image-2.6.32-23-preempt linux-image-2.6.32-24-preempt linux-image-2.6.33-23-realtime linux-image-2.6.33-29-realtime linux-image-2.6.33.5-rt23 linux-image-rt r...@ubuntu:~# rm -r /usr/src/linux-2.6.33.5-rt23 r...@ubuntu:~# rm /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.33.5-rt23_2.6.33.5-rt23-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb r...@ubuntu:~# rm /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.33.7-rt29_2.6.33.7-rt29-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb r...@ubuntu:~# rm /usr/src/linux-image-2.6.33.5-rt23_2.6.33.5-rt23-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb r...@ubuntu:~# rm /usr/src/linux-image-2.6.33.7-rt29_2.6.33.7-rt29-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb r...@ubuntu:~# rm /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.33.5-rt23_2.6.33.5-rt23-10.00.Custom_all.deb r...@ubuntu:~# rm /boot/grub/grub.cfg_Oct* r...@ubuntu:~# gparted There now should be enough free space. r...@ubuntu:~# logout ### Checking if everything still is ok spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make oldconfig spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ echo $CONCURRENCY_LEVEL Everything is ok. ### Tidying up spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make-kpkg clean ### Building the kernel spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot --initrd kernel-image kernel-headers kernel-source :) Didn't run 'make-kpkg clean', if something should be needed for debugging. ### Installing the image spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src/linux$ cd .. spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ sudo dpkg -i linux-image-2.6.33.7-rt29_2.6.33.7-rt29-10.00.Custom_amd64.deb spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ sudo gedit /boot/grub/grub.cfg ### I didn't try to boot he kernel ... because there's no initrd. spinymo...@ubuntu:/usr/src$ ls /boot -hAl total 21M -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 632K 2010-09-18 02:35 abi-2.6.32-25-preempt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 109K 2010-09-18 02:35 config-2.6.32-25-preempt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 108K 2010-10-03 04:53 config-2.6.33.7-rt29 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 12K 2010-10-03 07:31 grub -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8.0M 2010-10-02 12:22 initrd.img-2.6.32-25-preempt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 157K 2010-03-23 10:40 memtest86+.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.1M 2010-09-18 02:35 System.map-2.6.32-25-preempt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2.1M 2010-10-03 05:57 System.map-2.6.33.7-rt29 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.4K 2010-09-18 02:38 vmcoreinfo-2.6.32-25-preempt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4.0M 2010-09-18 02:35 vmlinuz-2.6.32-25-preempt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4.0M 2010-10-03 05:57 vmlinuz-2.6.33.7-rt29 What could be the reason that I don't get an initrd? Cheers! Ralf -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: kernel-rt crashes with Java
My way to install JDK is: $ sudo apt-get install sun-java6-bin $ sudo apt-get install sun-java6-jre (already installed) $ sudo apt-get install sun-java6-jdk $ export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun $ export PATH="$PATH:$JAVA_HOME/bin" $ export JRE_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/jre $ java -version is fine $ javac -version hangs my computer I used to install JDK (the same way) in UStudio 8.04, and everything was fine. I never tested UStudio 8.10. Something happened with rt-kernel in this timeline... Something similar was reported in Launchpad: "Kernel 2.6.28-3.12-rt crashes when running Sun Java real-time system" https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-rt/+question/69434 Thanks, Joan Quintana --- On Mon, 5/11/09, Christopher Stamper wrote: > From: Christopher Stamper > Subject: Re: kernel-rt crashes with Java > To: "Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion" > > Date: Monday, May 11, 2009, 8:00 PM > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Joan Quintana > wrote: > > > > > Working on my problem, I see that the problem is not > related with Ubuntu > > Studio, just the rt kernel. > > I make a clean install of Jaunty Desktop, and I can > compile > > HelloWorld.java. I install a kernel-rt, and javac > HelloWorld.java crashes my > > system. If I boot now with my generic kernel, > everything is OK > > > Ok, so I have a clean install of UbuntuStudio running the > RT kernel. > > Is there an easy way that I can test this?Like, do i have > to compile, or can > I just run a java app? 'cause I'm pretty sure > I've run java webapps before, > w/o any problems... > > -- > Christopher Stamper > > Email: christopherstam...@gmail.com > Web: http://tinyurl.com/2ooncg > gTalk: http://tinyurl.com/6e359r > Skype: cdstamper > -- > Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list > Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: kernel-rt crashes with Java
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Joan Quintana wrote: > > Working on my problem, I see that the problem is not related with Ubuntu > Studio, just the rt kernel. > I make a clean install of Jaunty Desktop, and I can compile > HelloWorld.java. I install a kernel-rt, and javac HelloWorld.java crashes my > system. If I boot now with my generic kernel, everything is OK Ok, so I have a clean install of UbuntuStudio running the RT kernel. Is there an easy way that I can test this?Like, do i have to compile, or can I just run a java app? 'cause I'm pretty sure I've run java webapps before, w/o any problems... -- Christopher Stamper Email: christopherstam...@gmail.com Web: http://tinyurl.com/2ooncg gTalk: http://tinyurl.com/6e359r Skype: cdstamper -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: kernel-rt crashes with Java
That... is an interesting discovery. On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 07:12:10AM -0700, Joan Quintana wrote: > > Working on my problem, I see that the problem is not related with Ubuntu > Studio, just the rt kernel. > I make a clean install of Jaunty Desktop, and I can compile HelloWorld.java. > I install a kernel-rt, and javac HelloWorld.java crashes my system. If I boot > now with my generic kernel, everything is OK. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks in advance, > Joan Quintana > > > > > -- > Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list > Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
kernel-rt crashes with Java
Working on my problem, I see that the problem is not related with Ubuntu Studio, just the rt kernel. I make a clean install of Jaunty Desktop, and I can compile HelloWorld.java. I install a kernel-rt, and javac HelloWorld.java crashes my system. If I boot now with my generic kernel, everything is OK. Any ideas? Thanks in advance, Joan Quintana -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: kernel-rt solution
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Loop Dundee wrote: > Hi there, > > the new Jaunty-9.04 is out. Fine, but where is the solution for the > current kernel-rt? Is there any plan or hint, how can i stop the > constant running cpu? Many friends of studioubuntu had send there > problems with RT to this list, but.. no answer. > > The cpu runs nonstop at round +- 10%, therefore the fans working with a > lot of noise and never stops. > > In the moment, it is not possible to run Jaunty as a stable > audio-workstation. Seq24 crashes directly and a lot of other sound > software has problems with the current mishmash soundsystem, especially > pulse. :/ > > There is no real difference between beta and official release. > > I think about to go back to my working hardy-64-lts. > > Is there anybody that has a solution? > > Greetings - Loop Dundee > > Mashine:Notebook: HP-DV6000, ICH8, Intel-T7500: > > Have you reported this issue to Launchpad.net? This list is full of users of the software, whereas launchpad is looked at by the guys who developed the kernel. I haven't experienced the same behaviour you describe, so it could be the combination of drivers you have running. -Eric -- ___ http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
kernel-rt solution
Hi there, the new Jaunty-9.04 is out. Fine, but where is the solution for the current kernel-rt? Is there any plan or hint, how can i stop the constant running cpu? Many friends of studioubuntu had send there problems with RT to this list, but.. no answer. The cpu runs nonstop at round +- 10%, therefore the fans working with a lot of noise and never stops. In the moment, it is not possible to run Jaunty as a stable audio-workstation. Seq24 crashes directly and a lot of other sound software has problems with the current mishmash soundsystem, especially pulse. :/ There is no real difference between beta and official release. I think about to go back to my working hardy-64-lts. Is there anybody that has a solution? Greetings - Loop Dundee Mashine:Notebook: HP-DV6000, ICH8, Intel-T7500: -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Kernel-rt
Hi there, today I have made some experience with the actual kernel-rt on my notebook hd-dv6000, intel, ICH8. (ubuntu-9-04-beta). Like the other tests with the kernel-rt, the acpi-subsystem can not control the fanspeed. The fancontrol doesnt't work. The rest works nice, also the shutdown works now correct. And certainly the sound. The generic kernel works very fine and makes a stable system impression. Loop Dundee -- b+k studio|.|f451 films buchholtz+krenzien d-12555 berlin call +49-30-93935514 http://www.wobulisten.de -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: jaunty beta + kernel RT
Luke Yelavich a écrit : > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 03:43:38PM EST, laurent.bellegarde wrote: > >> So after booting under 2.6.28-11-generic, i've look to theses packages, >> they are installed already. >> >> i've tried your command >> >> laur...@laurent-laptop:~$ sudo dkms -k 2.6.28-3-rt build -m fglrx -v 8.600 >> [sudo] password for laurent: >> >> Error! Your kernel source for kernel 2.6.28-3-rt cannot be found at >> /lib/modules/2.6.28-3-rt/build or /lib/modules/2.6.28-3-rt/source. >> You can use the --kernelsourcedir option to tell DKMS where it's located. >> laur...@laurent-laptop:~$ sudo dkms --kernelsourcedir build -m fglrx -v >> 8.600 >> laur...@laurent-laptop:~$ >> >> and then i reboot on RT-kernel, but same end, X crash and nothing work. >> > > Ok, you need to install linux-headers-2.6.28-3-rt, and then run the command I > gave you again. i've installed this package, done the command again, here is the terminal : laur...@laurent-laptop:~$ sudo dkms -k 2.6.28-3-rt build -m fglrx -v 8.600 [sudo] password for laurent: Error! This module/version has already been built on: 2.6.28-3-rt Directory: /var/lib/dkms/fglrx/8.600/2.6.28-3-rt/i686 already exists. Use the dkms remove function before trying to build again. a new boot with fglrx activated done the same trouble with X. So a get a new boot under generic kernel, desactivate flgrx driver, free radeon driver has been activated, then a reboot on rt-kernel. I've get a usable desktop. video resolution is ok, refreshing rate seems to be ok too. I didn't test acceleration and 3D effects, but under fglrx there is many trouble with compiz activated, so i'm waiting. the loaded kernel was an rt one, as the command tell it : laur...@laurent-laptop:~$ uname -a Linux laurent-laptop 2.6.28-3-rt #9-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT RT Fri Mar 27 23:23:50 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux so, i load qjackctl and try rt with my two sound card. - if i have rt on with internal sound card (bad one) hw0 -> jackd crash - if i have rt on with external sound card USB (good one) hw1 -> jackd crash and said this : 07:40:14.871 /usr/bin/jackd -R -dalsa -dhw:1 -r44100 -p64 -n2 07:40:14.887 JACK a été démarrer avec le PID=4403. no message buffer overruns jackd 0.116.1 Copyright 2001-2005 Paul Davis and others. jackd comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; see the file COPYING for details JACK compiled with System V SHM support. cannot use real-time scheduling (FIFO at priority 10) [for thread -1211967808, from thread -1211967808] (1: Operation not permitted) cannot create engine 07:40:14.900 JACK a été arrêté avec succès. 07:40:14.900 Script post-extinction... 07:40:14.901 killall jackd jackd: aucun processus tué 07:40:15.313 Script post-extinction terminé avec statut de sortie=256. 07:40:16.894 Impossible de connecter le serveur JACK comme client. - L'opération a échoué. - Incapable de se connecter au serveur. Veuillez consulter la fenêtre des messages pour plus d'informations. for memory, hw1 is working fine under hardy studio 8.04 64 bits RT with 64 frames/periode and 2,6ms for latency, hw0 is working but with few xruns. i've done the same test, but without checking the rt checkbox in qjackctl. same result for hw1 on usb, the sound card never work...and the frame/period change nothing. for hw0, a surprising result, with 512 frame/periode, 26,3ms for latency (so a bad one), the card is working not too bas, with few xruns. I've tried at 256 frames/periodes with ardour reading a wav file, and hydrogen playing a drumkit, recorded in ardour, it's working with few xruns. below 256, too many xruns. for conclusion, the internal sound card is working a little bit better than in hardy studio rt, but the usb one is not working at all. Bye Laurent -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: jaunty beta + kernel RT
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 03:43:38PM EST, laurent.bellegarde wrote: > So after booting under 2.6.28-11-generic, i've look to theses packages, > they are installed already. > > i've tried your command > > laur...@laurent-laptop:~$ sudo dkms -k 2.6.28-3-rt build -m fglrx -v 8.600 > [sudo] password for laurent: > > Error! Your kernel source for kernel 2.6.28-3-rt cannot be found at > /lib/modules/2.6.28-3-rt/build or /lib/modules/2.6.28-3-rt/source. > You can use the --kernelsourcedir option to tell DKMS where it's located. > laur...@laurent-laptop:~$ sudo dkms --kernelsourcedir build -m fglrx -v > 8.600 > laur...@laurent-laptop:~$ > > and then i reboot on RT-kernel, but same end, X crash and nothing work. Ok, you need to install linux-headers-2.6.28-3-rt, and then run the command I gave you again. Luke -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: jaunty beta + kernel RT
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:43 PM, laurent.bellegarde < laurent.bellega...@free.fr> wrote: > So after booting under 2.6.28-11-generic, i've look to theses packages, > they are installed already. > > i've tried your command > > laur...@laurent-laptop:~$ sudo dkms -k 2.6.28-3-rt build -m fglrx -v > 8.600 > [sudo] password for laurent: > > Error! Your kernel source for kernel 2.6.28-3-rt cannot be found at > /lib/modules/2.6.28-3-rt/build or /lib/modules/2.6.28-3-rt/source. > You can use the --kernelsourcedir option to tell DKMS where it's located. > laur...@laurent-laptop:~$ sudo dkms --kernelsourcedir build -m fglrx -v > 8.600 > laur...@laurent-laptop:~$ > > and then i reboot on RT-kernel, but same end, X crash and nothing work. > > Hmm, you've used the --kernelsourcedir flag, but you haven't specified the source directory of the kernel. Please try that again with the source directory listed directly after that flag. Also, have you tried without fglrx? I've found that Jaunty's improvements on xserver-xorg-video-radeon are working better than fglrx had ever worked for me - and I get to support open software at the same time! -Eric -- ___ http://greyrockstudio.blogspot.com -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: jaunty beta + kernel RT
Luke Yelavich a écrit : > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 08:25:10AM EST, laurent.bellegarde wrote: > >> Hi luke, >> >> this package was not installed, so i do it. I've restarted with >> rt-kernel after this install, but at the end, same conclusion, rt kernel >> still unable to work with ati graphic card, X is out of order. >> > > > To be sure the module has been built, make sure you have the > fgrlx-kernel-source and xorg-driver-fglrx packages installed, and run this > command to ensure the module is built for RT: sudo dkms -k 2.6.28-3-rt build > -m fglrx -v 8.600 > > Then try booting the RT kernel. > > Luke So after booting under 2.6.28-11-generic, i've look to theses packages, they are installed already. i've tried your command laur...@laurent-laptop:~$ sudo dkms -k 2.6.28-3-rt build -m fglrx -v 8.600 [sudo] password for laurent: Error! Your kernel source for kernel 2.6.28-3-rt cannot be found at /lib/modules/2.6.28-3-rt/build or /lib/modules/2.6.28-3-rt/source. You can use the --kernelsourcedir option to tell DKMS where it's located. laur...@laurent-laptop:~$ sudo dkms --kernelsourcedir build -m fglrx -v 8.600 laur...@laurent-laptop:~$ and then i reboot on RT-kernel, but same end, X crash and nothing work. Bye. Laurent -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: jaunty beta + kernel RT
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 08:25:10AM EST, laurent.bellegarde wrote: > Hi luke, > > this package was not installed, so i do it. I've restarted with > rt-kernel after this install, but at the end, same conclusion, rt kernel > still unable to work with ati graphic card, X is out of order. To be sure the module has been built, make sure you have the fgrlx-kernel-source and xorg-driver-fglrx packages installed, and run this command to ensure the module is built for RT: sudo dkms -k 2.6.28-3-rt build -m fglrx -v 8.600 Then try booting the RT kernel. Luke -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: jaunty beta + kernel RT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 laurent.bellegarde wrote: >>> >> The RT patches for the fgrlx drivers should be in the archive now, and ready >> to use. Make sure you have the linux-headers-rt package installed to ensure >> the drivers build. >> >> Luke >> > Hi luke, > > this package was not installed, so i do it. I've restarted with > rt-kernel after this install, but at the end, same conclusion, rt kernel > still unable to work with ati graphic card, X is out of order. > What about the radeonhd driver? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknT3OkACgkQwRXgH3rKGfOYRwCdHq6VvWqoqgvqEiTdOqVggS6+ s6gAoJy3tR/HBad4/18iRL6MMMnfyuXM =p2rG -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: jaunty beta + kernel RT
Luke Yelavich a écrit : > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 06:53:19AM EST, Cory K. wrote: > >> laurent.bellegarde wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> on my laptop, dual core intel 64 bits, ATI radeom HD 3470 i'm working >>> fine with hardy studio 8.04 64bits. >>> >>> As I was having too an intrepid 32 bits to test kdenlive 0.7, I've >>> upgraded tonight to jaunty beta. >>> >>> so now, under generic kernel, ATI flgrx is ok, audio is ok, but my >>> internal soundcard is not enough good to test jackd/ardour >>> >>> I've install jaunty rt kernel, install is ok, i've restarted on rt >>> jaunty kernel, 2.6.28-3-rt, the boot is ok, and when it starts X to >>> display gdm, the image gone bad, nothing is available. I've tried to go >>> to terminal with a CTRL + ALT + F2, and the screen gone bad with full of >>> colored squares !!! Nothing was working. So it seems that the jaunty rt >>> kernel is out of working at this time. >>> >>> Hope it helps. >>> >>> >> This is most likely the result of the rt patches not being in the ATI >> driver package yet. It should be very soon. Luke can correct me if I'm >> incorrect. >> > > The RT patches for the fgrlx drivers should be in the archive now, and ready > to use. Make sure you have the linux-headers-rt package installed to ensure > the drivers build. > > Luke > Hi luke, this package was not installed, so i do it. I've restarted with rt-kernel after this install, but at the end, same conclusion, rt kernel still unable to work with ati graphic card, X is out of order. Bye Laurent -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: jaunty beta + kernel RT
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 06:53:19AM EST, Cory K. wrote: > laurent.bellegarde wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > on my laptop, dual core intel 64 bits, ATI radeom HD 3470 i'm working > > fine with hardy studio 8.04 64bits. > > > > As I was having too an intrepid 32 bits to test kdenlive 0.7, I've > > upgraded tonight to jaunty beta. > > > > so now, under generic kernel, ATI flgrx is ok, audio is ok, but my > > internal soundcard is not enough good to test jackd/ardour > > > > I've install jaunty rt kernel, install is ok, i've restarted on rt > > jaunty kernel, 2.6.28-3-rt, the boot is ok, and when it starts X to > > display gdm, the image gone bad, nothing is available. I've tried to go > > to terminal with a CTRL + ALT + F2, and the screen gone bad with full of > > colored squares !!! Nothing was working. So it seems that the jaunty rt > > kernel is out of working at this time. > > > > Hope it helps. > > > > This is most likely the result of the rt patches not being in the ATI > driver package yet. It should be very soon. Luke can correct me if I'm > incorrect. The RT patches for the fgrlx drivers should be in the archive now, and ready to use. Make sure you have the linux-headers-rt package installed to ensure the drivers build. Luke -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: jaunty beta + kernel RT
Cory K. a écrit : > laurent.bellegarde wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> on my laptop, dual core intel 64 bits, ATI radeom HD 3470 i'm working >> fine with hardy studio 8.04 64bits. >> >> As I was having too an intrepid 32 bits to test kdenlive 0.7, I've >> upgraded tonight to jaunty beta. >> >> so now, under generic kernel, ATI flgrx is ok, audio is ok, but my >> internal soundcard is not enough good to test jackd/ardour >> >> I've install jaunty rt kernel, install is ok, i've restarted on rt >> jaunty kernel, 2.6.28-3-rt, the boot is ok, and when it starts X to >> display gdm, the image gone bad, nothing is available. I've tried to go >> to terminal with a CTRL + ALT + F2, and the screen gone bad with full of >> colored squares !!! Nothing was working. So it seems that the jaunty rt >> kernel is out of working at this time. >> >> Hope it helps. >> >> > > This is most likely the result of the rt patches not being in the ATI > driver package yet. It should be very soon. Luke can correct me if I'm > incorrect. > > > -Cory K. ok, i'm waiting one week and i'm doing the upgrade under generic to test again. I'm testing video tools under jaunty. Bye, Laurent -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
Re: jaunty beta + kernel RT
laurent.bellegarde wrote: > Hi everyone, > > on my laptop, dual core intel 64 bits, ATI radeom HD 3470 i'm working > fine with hardy studio 8.04 64bits. > > As I was having too an intrepid 32 bits to test kdenlive 0.7, I've > upgraded tonight to jaunty beta. > > so now, under generic kernel, ATI flgrx is ok, audio is ok, but my > internal soundcard is not enough good to test jackd/ardour > > I've install jaunty rt kernel, install is ok, i've restarted on rt > jaunty kernel, 2.6.28-3-rt, the boot is ok, and when it starts X to > display gdm, the image gone bad, nothing is available. I've tried to go > to terminal with a CTRL + ALT + F2, and the screen gone bad with full of > colored squares !!! Nothing was working. So it seems that the jaunty rt > kernel is out of working at this time. > > Hope it helps. > This is most likely the result of the rt patches not being in the ATI driver package yet. It should be very soon. Luke can correct me if I'm incorrect. -Cory K. -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
jaunty beta + kernel RT
Hi everyone, on my laptop, dual core intel 64 bits, ATI radeom HD 3470 i'm working fine with hardy studio 8.04 64bits. As I was having too an intrepid 32 bits to test kdenlive 0.7, I've upgraded tonight to jaunty beta. so now, under generic kernel, ATI flgrx is ok, audio is ok, but my internal soundcard is not enough good to test jackd/ardour I've install jaunty rt kernel, install is ok, i've restarted on rt jaunty kernel, 2.6.28-3-rt, the boot is ok, and when it starts X to display gdm, the image gone bad, nothing is available. I've tried to go to terminal with a CTRL + ALT + F2, and the screen gone bad with full of colored squares !!! Nothing was working. So it seems that the jaunty rt kernel is out of working at this time. Hope it helps. Laurent -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users