Re: Re: Natty and the Real Time Kernel

2011-05-05 Thread Bellegarde Laurent
Selon scottalaven...@gmail.com:

 On May 4, 2011 9:32am, Giuliano Braglia forever...@gmail.com wrote:



  There are PPA's available with real time kernels available and I would
  expect even for Natty. I believe Falktx's PPA is one of these and well
  maintained at that.





Hi all,

I'm starting testing natty i386 on a netbook celeron 900 2Go Asus eeepc 900
which is running with lucid i386 RT kernel fine (RT kernel is Alessio's one).

For natty, which kernel should I test ? Alessio's one, or FaltX' one ?

My wish is to test if natty low latency or RT kernel is stable and as performant
as lucid one before talking about it at Ubuntu Party in Paris the 28-29 may
2011...

Thanks for answers.


Bellegarde Laurent
free video : lprod.org

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users


Re: Re: Natty and the Real Time Kernel

2011-05-04 Thread ScottALavender

On May 4, 2011 9:32am, Giuliano Braglia forever...@gmail.com wrote:



There are PPA's available with real time kernels available and I would  
expect even for Natty. I believe Falktx's PPA is one of these and well  
maintained at that.






I don't know what a PPA is :p



PPA is an acronym for Personal Package Archive. This lets people package  
and build applications in their own personal repositories. These are very  
similar to the official repositories (like Main, Restricted, Universe,  
Multiverse) in Ubuntu.


You can add PPA's to your sources.list file and install applications from  
there. It is suggested that you should use caution and only use trusted  
PPA's as not all will have functioning applications or will be maintained  
well.


Here is a link that you can read more about PPA's:  
https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA




 Would they work even without it? In Lucid I tried to start without  
rtkernel and I had a lot of Xruns in Jack.









Additionally, you did not specify how you installed your audio packages,  
ie if you did a fresh install from a Ubuntu Studio DVD or just added the  
packages to a vanilla Ubuntu install. If you did the later you will still  
need to add your user to the audio group and you should have installed  
JACK so that it could use real time privileges. Without these you would  
suffer performance degradation.





Actually I'm on a Ubuntu properly modified following a guide made by an  
italian guy, do you think that, in future, I should install a complete  
Ubuntu Studio?









I have found that some people feel very passionate about this questions. I  
personally appreciate the complete Ubuntu Studio install as it reduces the  
amount that I have to tinker with my system. Others prefer to add their  
packages as required because it allows them to moderate their system to  
better serve their needs.


If you have a system that works for you then I would suggest staying with  
it. But you may try a full install once and see if it works better for you.


In some instances there are people that choose to start with a Ubuntu  
install first for technical reasons that might have been resolved in later  
Ubuntu Studio releases. I am specifically thinking about networking and  
wifi. In past Ubuntu Studio releases we shipped gnome-network-admin which  
had difficulty with setting wifi, therefore some might have started with a  
vanilla Ubuntu install before it shipped with network-manager which worked  
brilliantly for wiki. Ubuntu Studio has recently moved to using  
network-manager as well, so the reasoning for their installation process  
may not exists anymore.


Again, it's still a personal decision.

Regards,
ScottL
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users