Re: [ubuntu-uk] Two operating systems

2007-07-26 Thread SteVe Cook
Keith Powell wrote:
 For some time now, I have had two hard drives, each in its own plug-in
 mobile hard drive caddy. One has XP on it (which I still need :-( and
 the other has Ubuntu on it. So I have just plugged in whichever OS I
 wanted.
 
 I'm thinking of doing away with the hard drive caddies and installing
 both drives inside the computer. For ease, XP would remain on its
 existing drive and be plugged into the 'master' plug on the ribbon
 cable. The Ubuntu drive would be plugged into the 'slave' plug on the
 IDE ribbon cable. Ubuntu would probably be a reinstall on a new, larger
 hard drive, but I've not decided yet.
 
 I see that, if I press F8 during the BIOS boot, I can select what I boot
 from (different DVD drives or different hard drives). Selecting the
 appropriate hard drive from F8, I think, would be better than messing
 about setting GRUB up for dual booting. (Something which I don't know
 how to do at the moment!) It would mean that I don't have to do anything
 to the XP drive.
 
 Is what I want to do, using F8 feasible, or would I be better setting
 GRUB up?
 
 With two hard drives, how are the jumpers set up? One master and one
 slave, both master, or how?
 
 I also have two DVD drives, one is just a player and one which will record.
 
 Any advice will be very gratefully received.
 
Grub would make life easier and if you're reinstalling ubuntu grub would 
be set up for you if you have both drives in the machine.  Just connect 
the drives as normal XP as Master and ubuntu as slave.
You can do the F8 thing if you want, I know somebody that does it at 
work to hide ubuntu as they don't like unauthorised software on the 
machines, it's just a bit fiddly.

SteVe


-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Two operating systems

2007-07-26 Thread Matthew Wild

Setting GRUB up isn't something you generally have to do any more :)
Ubuntu installation will take care of it for you. Nowadays dual-booting has
become REALLY easy... I recommend it over switching BIOS settings, it's much
easier.

If both drives are on the same IDE cable then yes, one is master, and one is
slave. The arrangements should be shown on the back of the disks.

Matthew.

On 7/26/07, Keith Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


For some time now, I have had two hard drives, each in its own plug-in
mobile hard drive caddy. One has XP on it (which I still need :-( and
the other has Ubuntu on it. So I have just plugged in whichever OS I
wanted.

I'm thinking of doing away with the hard drive caddies and installing
both drives inside the computer. For ease, XP would remain on its
existing drive and be plugged into the 'master' plug on the ribbon
cable. The Ubuntu drive would be plugged into the 'slave' plug on the
IDE ribbon cable. Ubuntu would probably be a reinstall on a new, larger
hard drive, but I've not decided yet.

I see that, if I press F8 during the BIOS boot, I can select what I boot
from (different DVD drives or different hard drives). Selecting the
appropriate hard drive from F8, I think, would be better than messing
about setting GRUB up for dual booting. (Something which I don't know
how to do at the moment!) It would mean that I don't have to do anything
to the XP drive.

Is what I want to do, using F8 feasible, or would I be better setting
GRUB up?

With two hard drives, how are the jumpers set up? One master and one
slave, both master, or how?

I also have two DVD drives, one is just a player and one which will
record.

Any advice will be very gratefully received.

Many thanks

Keith




--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Two operating systems

2007-07-26 Thread Alec Wright
You would just need to set the Ubuntu one as master and the XP one as
slave (not the other way round like you suggested) and when you
reinstall Ubuntu, it should automatically add an entry in GRUB for XP.
If not, post back on this list and I'll tell you what you need to do to
add a GRUB entry.
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 20:18 +0100, Keith Powell wrote: 
 For some time now, I have had two hard drives, each in its own plug-in
 mobile hard drive caddy. One has XP on it (which I still need :-( and
 the other has Ubuntu on it. So I have just plugged in whichever OS I
 wanted.
 
 I'm thinking of doing away with the hard drive caddies and installing
 both drives inside the computer. For ease, XP would remain on its
 existing drive and be plugged into the 'master' plug on the ribbon
 cable. The Ubuntu drive would be plugged into the 'slave' plug on the
 IDE ribbon cable. Ubuntu would probably be a reinstall on a new, larger
 hard drive, but I've not decided yet.
 
 I see that, if I press F8 during the BIOS boot, I can select what I boot
 from (different DVD drives or different hard drives). Selecting the
 appropriate hard drive from F8, I think, would be better than messing
 about setting GRUB up for dual booting. (Something which I don't know
 how to do at the moment!) It would mean that I don't have to do anything
 to the XP drive.
 
 Is what I want to do, using F8 feasible, or would I be better setting
 GRUB up?
 
 With two hard drives, how are the jumpers set up? One master and one
 slave, both master, or how?
 
 I also have two DVD drives, one is just a player and one which will record.
 
 Any advice will be very gratefully received.
 
 Many thanks
 
 Keith
 
 
 
 


-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Two operating systems

2007-07-26 Thread alan c
Alec Wright wrote:
 You would just need to set the Ubuntu one as master and the XP one as
 slave (not the other way round like you suggested) and when you
 reinstall Ubuntu, it should automatically add an entry in GRUB for XP.

I do not think that it matters much whether one is master or slave (I 
think).

The master boot record is presumably on the master hd, and it will be 
modified by the ubuntu install wherever that is, to then use the 
ubuntu boot information (grub).

It is easier to have windows in place first, because if you install 
windows last, it does not take linux into account.
-- 
alan cocks
Kubuntu user#10391

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Two operating systems

2007-07-26 Thread Neil Greenwood
On 26/07/07, Alec Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 You would just need to set the Ubuntu one as master and the XP one as
 slave (not the other way round like you suggested) and when you
 reinstall Ubuntu, it should automatically add an entry in GRUB for XP.
 If not, post back on this list and I'll tell you what you need to do to
 add a GRUB entry.

I don't think XP will be too happy booting if it's not on the master disk.
As Steve said, keep the XP disk as master and make the Ubuntu disk the
slave (using the jumpers on the back of the drives - should be easy to
see if they're still in the caddies at the mo!).

When you reinstall Ubuntu onto the slave disk, you can select to set
up Grub on the MBR of the first disk, and Bob's your Auntie's live-in
lover!

If you do put the XP disk as the slave, I think you need to use the
install disk to re-configure the boot loader to get it to work. And it
needs to be a proper install disk that will allow you to get to the
recovery console - I tried it with Win2k but I only have an OEM
reinstall disk which only offered a complete wipe of the disk to FAT32
(I originally got the PC formatted as NTFS). I haven't used Windows
since!

Hwyl,
Neil.

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] [uk-marketing] Spearhead the attack!!!!

2007-07-26 Thread Andy Loughran
enthusiam

#Segfault

enthusiasm was prematurely killed by the 'work' process.

Guys,

Many apologies for not doing much since the decision to kick off ubuntu-uk 
marketing was made.  I've been incredibly busy with work and have been too 
tired to offer my services to anything else.  My motorway journeys home have 
also generally consisted of drive - nap - drive over this last week as I've 
been so tired.

I'm off on holiday tomorrow (and don't I need it) to France - so if there's a 
rainy day I'm taking the laptop so I can do some ubuntu work :)

Once again, apologies for the lack of an perceived effort on my part.  It will 
hopefully come into fruition and be evident in the coming weeks.

Regards,


Andy Loughran
www.zrmt.com
m: 07921076319

- Original Message -
From: Matthew Larsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: British Ubuntu Talk ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
Sent: 26 July 2007 22:05:50 o'clock (GMT) Europe/London
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] [uk-marketing] Spearhead the attack

Hey Chris, all

Sorry I havn't been poking my head out much, I've been snowed under
with my first few weeks at work and simply am too tired in the
evenings to do stuff. I have been keeping up with mails though and
intend to put some work back in during the weekend, including
finishing off those leaflets

Might go to Lonix on sat too if anyone else is going

Regards,

On 24/07/07, Chris Rowson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi folks,

 enthusiasm

 I'm feeling in a militant mood today!

 Check out our first article for publishing in local magazines:

 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/Marketing/ArticleForLocalMagazine

 You'll notice that I've created a submissions table at the bottom to
 track where this article goes. Why not give it a bash, and if you like
 it, submit it to your own magazine, student or work publication?

 Of course you don't have to use that particular article, feel free to
 create your own and use that instead. But if you do, please put it
 onto the wiki so we can all use it. A good place to link to your
 article from would be here:

 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/Marketing#head-444a1c3c32b9574071fade666e86f7b79444a50c

 /enthusiasm

 Chris

 --
 ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
 https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/



-- 
Matthew G Larsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+44(0)7739 785 249

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/



-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] Two operating systems

2007-07-26 Thread Keith Powell
For some time now, I have had two hard drives, each in its own plug-in
mobile hard drive caddy. One has XP on it (which I still need :-( and
the other has Ubuntu on it. So I have just plugged in whichever OS I
wanted.

I'm thinking of doing away with the hard drive caddies and installing
both drives inside the computer. For ease, XP would remain on its
existing drive and be plugged into the 'master' plug on the ribbon
cable. The Ubuntu drive would be plugged into the 'slave' plug on the
IDE ribbon cable. Ubuntu would probably be a reinstall on a new, larger
hard drive, but I've not decided yet.

I see that, if I press F8 during the BIOS boot, I can select what I boot
from (different DVD drives or different hard drives). Selecting the
appropriate hard drive from F8, I think, would be better than messing
about setting GRUB up for dual booting. (Something which I don't know
how to do at the moment!) It would mean that I don't have to do anything
to the XP drive.

Is what I want to do, using F8 feasible, or would I be better setting
GRUB up?

With two hard drives, how are the jumpers set up? One master and one
slave, both master, or how?

I also have two DVD drives, one is just a player and one which will record.

Any advice will be very gratefully received.

Many thanks

Keith




-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] ubuntu-uk Digest, Vol 27, Issue 47

2007-07-26 Thread Pete Stean

Hmm, that hard disc idea sounds good in principal, but then you've got
someone who is in the position of suddenly having to worry about DOA
products etc etc - a complete headache waiting to happen :\
Not that I'm nay-saying or anything, but in reality it sounds a bit like
hard work to me

Pete


On 26/07/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Send ubuntu-uk mailing list submissions to
   ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
   https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of ubuntu-uk digest...


Today's Topics:

  1. Re:  Contents of ubuntu-uk digest... (Alec Wright)
  2. Re:  Contents of ubuntu-uk digest... (Alan Pope)
  3. Re:  Repos on a Disk (Alan Pope)


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:10:03 +0100
From: Alec Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] Contents of ubuntu-uk digest...
To: British Ubuntu Talk ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain

On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 20:57 +0100, Ian Pascoe wrote:

 And of course the beauty of HDDs is that they're R/W, so you store the
 up to date images on a server and when the HDDs go out you just copy
 across the latest image.

That just gave me an idea... (if you're sane you'll stop reading now)
Canonical could sell external hard disks with version(s),
architecture(s) and (what do you call those things which main,
restricted, universe and multiverse are?)(s) which you choose on them.
After you've chosen what you want (eg main and restricted for feisty and
dapper), they recommend the right size hard drive for you. They put the
repos on the hard drive and send it to you.
Then perhaps you could send it back to them and them pay them a bit to
update it...
Except there'd probably not be much demand for this. It would only be
useful in large businesses, which would almost undoubtedly have an
internet connection. Oh well... My idea sucks... Live with it.




--

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:18:58 +0100
From: Alan Pope [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] Contents of ubuntu-uk digest...
To: British Ubuntu Talk ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Hi Alec,

On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 21:10 +0100, Alec Wright wrote:
 On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 20:57 +0100, Ian Pascoe wrote:

  And of course the beauty of HDDs is that they're R/W, so you store the
  up to date images on a server and when the HDDs go out you just copy
  across the latest image.

 That just gave me an idea... (if you're sane you'll stop reading now)
 Canonical could sell external hard disks with version(s),
 architecture(s) and (what do you call those things which main,
 restricted, universe and multiverse are?)(s) which you choose on them.
 After you've chosen what you want (eg main and restricted for feisty and
 dapper), they recommend the right size hard drive for you. They put the
 repos on the hard drive and send it to you.
 Then perhaps you could send it back to them and them pay them a bit to
 update it...
 Except there'd probably not be much demand for this. It would only be
 useful in large businesses, which would almost undoubtedly have an
 internet connection. Oh well... My idea sucks... Live with it.



Er, that's exactly what I proposed when I first brought this up, only
not Canonical specifically doing it. :)

Cheersm
Al.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-uk/attachments/20070725/bb8f66d5/attachment-0001.pgp

--

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:32:44 +0100
From: Alan Pope [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] Repos on a Disk
To: British Ubuntu Talk ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi,

On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 18:40 +0100, Ian Pascoe wrote:
 Hi-de-hi


Ho-de-ho.

 Popey floated an idea a little while back about putting the entire
Ubuntu
 Repository onto a portable HD for use by those who don't have the
ability
 to connect to the Internet or only over dial-up.


That's it. I have it on my to-do list along with a zillion other
things :)

 Just to bring to everyones attention that the apt-get series of commands
 appears to have been enhanced to do exactly this apt-get mirror for
example.

apt-mirror is the command I was using, it's been around for some time,
and whilst there are a few bugs, it's pretty good at doing what I
planned.

When I brought it up there was 

Re: [ubuntu-uk] [uk-marketing] Spearhead the attack!!!!

2007-07-26 Thread Matthew Larsen
Hey Chris, all

Sorry I havn't been poking my head out much, I've been snowed under
with my first few weeks at work and simply am too tired in the
evenings to do stuff. I have been keeping up with mails though and
intend to put some work back in during the weekend, including
finishing off those leaflets

Might go to Lonix on sat too if anyone else is going

Regards,

On 24/07/07, Chris Rowson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi folks,

 enthusiasm

 I'm feeling in a militant mood today!

 Check out our first article for publishing in local magazines:

 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/Marketing/ArticleForLocalMagazine

 You'll notice that I've created a submissions table at the bottom to
 track where this article goes. Why not give it a bash, and if you like
 it, submit it to your own magazine, student or work publication?

 Of course you don't have to use that particular article, feel free to
 create your own and use that instead. But if you do, please put it
 onto the wiki so we can all use it. A good place to link to your
 article from would be here:

 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/Marketing#head-444a1c3c32b9574071fade666e86f7b79444a50c

 /enthusiasm

 Chris

 --
 ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
 https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/



-- 
Matthew G Larsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+44(0)7739 785 249

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] ubuntu-uk Digest, Vol 27, Issue 47

2007-07-26 Thread Alan Pope
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 12:16:37PM +0100, Pete Stean wrote:
 Hmm, that hard disc idea sounds good in principal, but then you've got
 someone who is in the position of suddenly having to worry about DOA
 products etc etc - a complete headache waiting to happen :\
 Not that I'm nay-saying or anything, but in reality it sounds a bit like
 hard work to me
 

Indeed it does :)

There are already people who sell a copies of the repo on DVD/CD, but I 
don't know how popular those products are. 

Hard disks would be potentially harder work in some ways, but easier in 
others. It's very easy to have a cron job that regularly runs apt-mirror to 
keep the master copy up to date, and just rsync the master over to a new 
disk as/when it is needed to replenish stock or update it prior to sale.

Dealing with multiple optical media for each customer also has ups and 
downs. If you were to take a copy of the binary packages only then it would 
fit on 3 dual layer DVDs, or 5 single layer ones. If you went for the whole 
repo (for one release) - including source packages as well as binary, then 
it would fit on 5 dual layer DVDs, or 9 single layer ones. These assume 
capacities of 7.7GiB for a DL and 4GiB for a SL.

The above figures were thrown together based on a full repo size of 
35GiB (for one architecture, one release - e.g. Feisty i386 full repo is 
33.1GiB, Dapper sparc full repo is 30.1GiB), and a binary only repo of about 
17GiB (they all differ but that's about the max).

Clearly if you wanted to fully load up a hard disk this is something that 
would be impractical on DVD. For example after Gutsy releases there would be 
3 supported releases that you'd probably ship - Dapper (LTS), Feisty and 
Gutsy. Four (i386, AMD64, powerpc and sparc) architectures makes for a full 
repo size of 392GiB! - Binary only would be around 189GiB. It soon mounts 
up, especially if you go multi arch.

Then there's the possibility of the other architectures like the PS3, 
however you might argue that someone who has a PS3 likely has broadband? 

Cheers,
Al.

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Two operating systems

2007-07-26 Thread Sean Miller
Keith Powell wrote:
 I see that, if I press F8 during the BIOS boot, I can select what I boot
 from (different DVD drives or different hard drives). Selecting the
 appropriate hard drive from F8, I think, would be better than messing
 about setting GRUB up for dual booting. (Something which I don't know
 how to do at the moment!) It would mean that I don't have to do anything
 to the XP drive.
   
Grief, no... put the XP drive as master, and your blank shiny new drive 
as slave... boot into XP to make sure it's working and you're ready to go.

Shutdown machine and restart, booting from the Ubuntu CD. Once it's 
loaded click on the Install icon, make sure your new slave drive is 
selected as the install destination and sit back and let Ubuntu do it 
all for you. It will, eventually, ask you if you want it to put a link 
to XP on grub (or similar), just confirm you do and all will be sorted.

There's no reason at all why you could need to mess around or even 
touch grub... it should be automatic.

Sean

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/