[ubuntu-uk] Which boot options on the live CD?

2011-11-12 Thread Byte Soup
Hi,

I was looking ar a PC for a neighbour and tried to boot from a live CD to
backup some data for them. The Ubuntu and Xubuntu live CDs wont boot, but a
Knoppix DVD will boot and run just fine. How can I tell what if any boot
options the knoppix system booted with?

Heres the output of lspci and lscpu on the machine in question:

knoppix@Microknoppix:~$ lspci
00:00.0 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation MCP61 Memory Controller (rev a1)
00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP61 LPC Bridge (rev a2)
00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation MCP61 SMBus (rev a2)
00:01.2 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation MCP61 Memory Controller (rev a2)
00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation MCP61 USB Controller (rev a2)
00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation MCP61 USB Controller (rev a2)
00:04.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI bridge (rev a1)
00:05.0 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP61 High Definition Audio (rev
a2)
00:06.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation MCP61 IDE (rev a2)
00:07.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP61 Ethernet (rev a2)
00:08.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation MCP61 SATA Controller (rev a2)
00:09.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI Express bridge (rev a2)
00:0b.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI Express bridge (rev a2)
00:0c.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI Express bridge (rev a2)
00:0d.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation C61 [GeForce 6100
nForce 405] (rev a2)
00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron]
HyperTransport Technology Configuration
00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron]
Address Map
00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron]
DRAM Controller
00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron]
Miscellaneous Control


knoppix@Microknoppix:~$ lscpu
Architecture:  i686
CPU op-mode(s):64-bit
CPU(s):1
Thread(s) per core:1
Core(s) per socket:1
CPU socket(s): 1
Vendor ID: AuthenticAMD
CPU family:15
Model: 95
Stepping:  2
CPU MHz:   2410.764
Virtualization:AMD-V
L1d cache: 64K
L1i cache: 64K
L2 cache:  512K
knoppix@Microknoppix:~$


Thanks

-Mark
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Which boot options on the live CD?

2011-11-12 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 09:51:34AM +, Byte Soup wrote:
 I was looking ar a PC for a neighbour and tried to boot from a live CD to
 backup some data for them. The Ubuntu and Xubuntu live CDs wont boot, but a
 Knoppix DVD will boot and run just fine. How can I tell what if any boot
 options the knoppix system booted with?

  cat /proc/cpuinfo

But this may be a red herring; kernel differences may matter more, or it
could be something else depending on exactly what's going on.

-- 
Colin Watson   [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu UK Team Google+ page?

2011-11-12 Thread alan c
From the G+ novice department:

I am starting to use G+ and have just written an item, shared (I
think)with the Ubuntu UK  Team (circle).

Is it actually there? Anyone?
-- 
alan cocks
Ubuntu user

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu UK Team Google+ page?

2011-11-12 Thread Andy Smith
Hi Alan,

On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:35:03PM +, alan c wrote:
 I am starting to use G+ and have just written an item, shared (I
 think)with the Ubuntu UK  Team (circle).

If that is a circle that you created, I think that only influences
what the people you put in that circle see.

 Is it actually there? Anyone?

I don't see a post from you on the Ubuntu UK page. When I look on
your specific page, I get alan hasn't shared anything with you.

Cheers,
Andy

-- 
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu UK Team Google+ page?

2011-11-12 Thread alan c
On 12/11/11 14:05, Andy Smith wrote:
 Hi Alan,
 
 On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:35:03PM +, alan c wrote:
 I am starting to use G+ and have just written an item, shared (I
 think)with the Ubuntu UK  Team (circle).
 
 If that is a circle that you created, I think that only influences
 what the people you put in that circle see.
 
 Is it actually there? Anyone?
 
 I don't see a post from you on the Ubuntu UK page. When I look on
 your specific page, I get alan hasn't shared anything with you.

Thanks Andy. mmm what to do.
I have a Circle named Ubuntu UK Team, with only Ubuntu UK Team in it.

I enter this circle and put text into 'share whats new' at the top.
Then 'share', and it gets shown when I look in my Ubuntu UK Team
Circle as if it is posted  to Ubuntu UK Team. Below it  I see three items:

+1 CommentShare

and when I click on 'Share' I see:
'This post was originally shared with a limited audience – remember to
be thoughtful about who you share it with'
Which I had guessed that it was shared inside the Ubuntu UK Team
Circle - that is, shared WITH the Ubuntu UK Team, but maybe not??

Help?
-- 
alan cocks
Ubuntu user

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu UK Team Google+ page?

2011-11-12 Thread Colin Law
On 12 November 2011 14:47, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:
 On 12/11/11 14:05, Andy Smith wrote:
 Hi Alan,

 On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:35:03PM +, alan c wrote:
 I am starting to use G+ and have just written an item, shared (I
 think)with the Ubuntu UK  Team (circle).

 If that is a circle that you created, I think that only influences
 what the people you put in that circle see.

 Is it actually there? Anyone?

 I don't see a post from you on the Ubuntu UK page. When I look on
 your specific page, I get alan hasn't shared anything with you.

 Thanks Andy. mmm what to do.
 I have a Circle named Ubuntu UK Team, with only Ubuntu UK Team in it.

 I enter this circle and put text into 'share whats new' at the top.
 Then 'share', and it gets shown when I look in my Ubuntu UK Team
 Circle as if it is posted  to Ubuntu UK Team.

If you share it with the user Ubuntu UK Team then only a user logged
on as Ubuntu UK Team will see it.  It is not like the facebook wall on
which anyone can post.  Think if you set up your daughter in a circle
and shared something with her, then only she will be able to see it.
It will not appear on her public page.  Only stuff that she shares
with the public will appear there.

Colin

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu UK Team Google+ page?

2011-11-12 Thread alan c
On 12/11/11 14:57, Colin Law wrote:
 On 12 November 2011 14:47, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:
 On 12/11/11 14:05, Andy Smith wrote:
 Hi Alan,

 On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:35:03PM +, alan c wrote:
 I am starting to use G+ and have just written an item, shared (I
 think)with the Ubuntu UK Â Team (circle).

 If that is a circle that you created, I think that only influences
 what the people you put in that circle see.

 Is it actually there? Anyone?

 I don't see a post from you on the Ubuntu UK page. When I look on
 your specific page, I get alan hasn't shared anything with you.

 Thanks Andy. mmm what to do.
 I have a Circle named Ubuntu UK Team, with only Ubuntu UK Team in it.

 I enter this circle and put text into 'share whats new' at the top.
 Then 'share', and it gets shown when I look in my Ubuntu UK Team
 Circle as if it is posted  to Ubuntu UK Team.
 
 If you share it with the user Ubuntu UK Team then only a user logged
 on as Ubuntu UK Team will see it

what exactly does 'logged on as Ubuntu UK Team' mean?
I have Ubuntu UK Team in a circle I made, I am signed in to G+ and am
viewing inside  my Ubuntu UK Team (circle), I see my own post and  one
about a song written for Ubuntu etc.
What is the status of my own post? Isn't it shared with others also
viewing the Ubuntu UK Team?

tia
-- 
alan cocks
Ubuntu user

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu UK Team Google+ page?

2011-11-12 Thread Neil Perry
On 12 November 2011 15:10, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:

 On 12/11/11 14:57, Colin Law wrote:
  On 12 November 2011 14:47, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:
  On 12/11/11 14:05, Andy Smith wrote:
  Hi Alan,
 
  On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:35:03PM +, alan c wrote:
  I am starting to use G+ and have just written an item, shared (I
  think)with the Ubuntu UK Â Team (circle).
 
  If that is a circle that you created, I think that only influences
  what the people you put in that circle see.
 
  Is it actually there? Anyone?
 
  I don't see a post from you on the Ubuntu UK page. When I look on
  your specific page, I get alan hasn't shared anything with you.
 
  Thanks Andy. mmm what to do.
  I have a Circle named Ubuntu UK Team, with only Ubuntu UK Team in it.
 
  I enter this circle and put text into 'share whats new' at the top.
  Then 'share', and it gets shown when I look in my Ubuntu UK Team
  Circle as if it is posted  to Ubuntu UK Team.
 
  If you share it with the user Ubuntu UK Team then only a user logged
  on as Ubuntu UK Team will see it

 what exactly does 'logged on as Ubuntu UK Team' mean?
 I have Ubuntu UK Team in a circle I made, I am signed in to G+ and am
 viewing inside  my Ubuntu UK Team (circle), I see my own post and  one
 about a song written for Ubuntu etc.
 What is the status of my own post? Isn't it shared with others also
 viewing the Ubuntu UK Team?

 tia
 --
 alan cocks
 Ubuntu user

 --


If the people are following youyou in a circle and you have them in the
ubuntu-uk circle - then they will see it..

  ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu UK Team Google+ page?

2011-11-12 Thread alan c
On 12/11/11 15:13, Neil Perry wrote:
 On 12 November 2011 15:10, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:
 
 On 12/11/11 14:57, Colin Law wrote:
  On 12 November 2011 14:47, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:
  On 12/11/11 14:05, Andy Smith wrote:
  Hi Alan,
 
  On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:35:03PM +, alan c wrote:
  I am starting to use G+ and have just written an item, shared (I
  think)with the Ubuntu UK Â Team (circle).
 
  If that is a circle that you created, I think that only influences
  what the people you put in that circle see.
 
  Is it actually there? Anyone?
 
  I don't see a post from you on the Ubuntu UK page. When I look on
  your specific page, I get alan hasn't shared anything with you.
 
  Thanks Andy. mmm what to do.
  I have a Circle named Ubuntu UK Team, with only Ubuntu UK Team in it.
 
  I enter this circle and put text into 'share whats new' at the top.
  Then 'share', and it gets shown when I look in my Ubuntu UK Team
  Circle as if it is posted  to Ubuntu UK Team.
 
  If you share it with the user Ubuntu UK Team then only a user logged
  on as Ubuntu UK Team will see it

 what exactly does 'logged on as Ubuntu UK Team' mean?
 I have Ubuntu UK Team in a circle I made, I am signed in to G+ and am
 viewing inside  my Ubuntu UK Team (circle), I see my own post and  one
 about a song written for Ubuntu etc.
 What is the status of my own post? Isn't it shared with others also
 viewing the Ubuntu UK Team?

 tia
 --
 alan cocks
 Ubuntu user

 --

 
 If the people are following youyou in a circle and you have them in the
 ubuntu-uk circle - then they will see it..

Thanks
So each participant must be in a circle - mutually as it were?
So if I wanted a post to be seen by everyone  who is following Ubuntu
UK Team, is there a way for this?

--
alan cocks
Ubuntu user

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu UK Team Google+ page?

2011-11-12 Thread Tony Pursell
On 12 November 2011 15:20, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:


 On 12/11/11 15:13, Neil Perry wrote:
  On 12 November 2011 15:10, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:
 
  On 12/11/11 14:57, Colin Law wrote:
   On 12 November 2011 14:47, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:
   On 12/11/11 14:05, Andy Smith wrote:
   Hi Alan,
  
   On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:35:03PM +, alan c wrote:
   I am starting to use G+ and have just written an item, shared (I
   think)with the Ubuntu UK Â Team (circle).
  
   If that is a circle that you created, I think that only influences
   what the people you put in that circle see.
  
   Is it actually there? Anyone?
  
   I don't see a post from you on the Ubuntu UK page. When I look on
   your specific page, I get alan hasn't shared anything with you.
  
   Thanks Andy. mmm what to do.
   I have a Circle named Ubuntu UK Team, with only Ubuntu UK Team in it.
  
   I enter this circle and put text into 'share whats new' at the top.
   Then 'share', and it gets shown when I look in my Ubuntu UK Team
   Circle as if it is posted  to Ubuntu UK Team.
  
   If you share it with the user Ubuntu UK Team then only a user logged
   on as Ubuntu UK Team will see it
 
  what exactly does 'logged on as Ubuntu UK Team' mean?
  I have Ubuntu UK Team in a circle I made, I am signed in to G+ and am
  viewing inside  my Ubuntu UK Team (circle), I see my own post and  one
  about a song written for Ubuntu etc.
  What is the status of my own post? Isn't it shared with others also
  viewing the Ubuntu UK Team?
 
  tia
  --
  alan cocks
  Ubuntu user
 
  --
 
 
  If the people are following youyou in a circle and you have them in the
  ubuntu-uk circle - then they will see it..

 Thanks
 So each participant must be in a circle - mutually as it were?
 So if I wanted a post to be seen by everyone  who is following Ubuntu
 UK Team, is there a way for this?

 -


Yes,that is the nub of the question I have.  I can 'follow' Ubuntu-UK and
get their posts on my 'wall', but how does one post something so that
Ubuntu-UK 'followers' see it?
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Which boot options on the live CD?

2011-11-12 Thread bodsda
If the knoppix dvd gives you a grub prompt, edit the entry by pressing the 'e' 
key and reading the boot options

On the ubuntu cd's I think there is a menu option for adding extra parameters

Check the ubuntu wiki for common boot params, I think the usual ones are 
something along the lines of acpi=off and noapic

Hth,
Bodsda
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

-Original Message-
From: Byte Soup bytes...@gmail.com
Sender: ubuntu-uk-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 09:51:34 
To: UK Ubuntu Talkubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
Reply-To: UK Ubuntu Talk ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: [ubuntu-uk] Which boot options on the live CD?

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu UK Team Google+ page?

2011-11-12 Thread Grant Sewell
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 15:47:28 +
Tony Pursell wrote:

 On 12 November 2011 15:20, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:
 
 
  On 12/11/11 15:13, Neil Perry wrote:
   On 12 November 2011 15:10, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com
   wrote:
  
   On 12/11/11 14:57, Colin Law wrote:
On 12 November 2011 14:47, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com
wrote:
On 12/11/11 14:05, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi Alan,
   
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:35:03PM +, alan c wrote:
I am starting to use G+ and have just written an item,
shared (I think)with the Ubuntu UK Â Team (circle).
   
If that is a circle that you created, I think that only
influences what the people you put in that circle see.
   
Is it actually there? Anyone?
   
I don't see a post from you on the Ubuntu UK page. When I
look on your specific page, I get alan hasn't shared
anything with you.
   
Thanks Andy. mmm what to do.
I have a Circle named Ubuntu UK Team, with only Ubuntu UK
Team in it.
   
I enter this circle and put text into 'share whats new' at
the top. Then 'share', and it gets shown when I look in my
Ubuntu UK Team Circle as if it is posted  to Ubuntu UK Team.
   
If you share it with the user Ubuntu UK Team then only a user
logged on as Ubuntu UK Team will see it
  
   what exactly does 'logged on as Ubuntu UK Team' mean?
   I have Ubuntu UK Team in a circle I made, I am signed in to G+
   and am viewing inside  my Ubuntu UK Team (circle), I see my own
   post and  one about a song written for Ubuntu etc.
   What is the status of my own post? Isn't it shared with others
   also viewing the Ubuntu UK Team?
  
   tia
   --
   alan cocks
   Ubuntu user
  
   --
  
  
   If the people are following youyou in a circle and you have them
   in the ubuntu-uk circle - then they will see it..
 
  Thanks
  So each participant must be in a circle - mutually as it were?
  So if I wanted a post to be seen by everyone  who is following
  Ubuntu UK Team, is there a way for this?
 
  -
 
 
 Yes,that is the nub of the question I have.  I can 'follow' Ubuntu-UK
 and get their posts on my 'wall', but how does one post something so
 that Ubuntu-UK 'followers' see it?

I don't you you can.  At least not yet.

Grant.

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu UK Team Google+ page?

2011-11-12 Thread alan c
On 12/11/11 15:47, Tony Pursell wrote:
 On 12 November 2011 15:20, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:
 

 On 12/11/11 15:13, Neil Perry wrote:
  On 12 November 2011 15:10, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:
 
  On 12/11/11 14:57, Colin Law wrote:
   On 12 November 2011 14:47, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:
   On 12/11/11 14:05, Andy Smith wrote:
   Hi Alan,
  
   On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:35:03PM +, alan c wrote:
   I am starting to use G+ and have just written an item, shared (I
   think)with the Ubuntu UK Â Team (circle).
  
   If that is a circle that you created, I think that only influences
   what the people you put in that circle see.
  
   Is it actually there? Anyone?
  
   I don't see a post from you on the Ubuntu UK page. When I look on
   your specific page, I get alan hasn't shared anything with you.
  
   Thanks Andy. mmm what to do.
   I have a Circle named Ubuntu UK Team, with only Ubuntu UK Team in it.
  
   I enter this circle and put text into 'share whats new' at the top.
   Then 'share', and it gets shown when I look in my Ubuntu UK Team
   Circle as if it is posted  to Ubuntu UK Team.
  
   If you share it with the user Ubuntu UK Team then only a user logged
   on as Ubuntu UK Team will see it
 
  what exactly does 'logged on as Ubuntu UK Team' mean?
  I have Ubuntu UK Team in a circle I made, I am signed in to G+ and am
  viewing inside  my Ubuntu UK Team (circle), I see my own post and  one
  about a song written for Ubuntu etc.
  What is the status of my own post? Isn't it shared with others also
  viewing the Ubuntu UK Team?
 
  tia
  --
  alan cocks
  Ubuntu user
 
  --
 
 
  If the people are following youyou in a circle and you have them in the
  ubuntu-uk circle - then they will see it..

 Thanks
 So each participant must be in a circle - mutually as it were?
 So if I wanted a post to be seen by everyone  who is following Ubuntu
 UK Team, is there a way for this?

 Yes,that is the nub of the question I have.  I can 'follow' Ubuntu-UK and
 get their posts on my 'wall', but how does one post something so that
 Ubuntu-UK 'followers' see it?

Exactly my problem!

+1

;-)

-- 
alan cocks
Ubuntu user

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] Bug #1 and onwards....

2011-11-12 Thread alan c
Yesterday I spent time with someone who was interested in using
Ubuntu. The Live CD ran well in her laptop. However, the live session
disc utility showed some errors, numerically apparently quite a lot. I
discussed her considering a new drive, but anyway helped her back up
some files.

She later had contact with her son who connected remotely and

'could not find any significant problems and made the comment your
HDD is formatted as NTFS the drivers in UBUNTU have only been around a
short time. Basically a Microsoft file format. that has been reverse
engineered. So he feels I should just do a full back-up at the moment
and he will keep checking the hard drive. So that is what I shall do'

I do not know whether to laugh or cry.

(originally I attempted to post and share this on my Google+  but
failed to share with Ubuntu UK Team)
-- 
alan cocks
Ubuntu user

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Bug #1 and onwards....

2011-11-12 Thread Gareth France
Intriguing. So why would Ubuntu spot faults on a drive that Windows can't?
I mean you can understand that guy's perspective, you would expect
Microsoft of all people to be the best at working with NTFS.

On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 4:31 PM, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:

 Yesterday I spent time with someone who was interested in using
 Ubuntu. The Live CD ran well in her laptop. However, the live session
 disc utility showed some errors, numerically apparently quite a lot. I
 discussed her considering a new drive, but anyway helped her back up
 some files.

 She later had contact with her son who connected remotely and

 'could not find any significant problems and made the comment your
 HDD is formatted as NTFS the drivers in UBUNTU have only been around a
 short time. Basically a Microsoft file format. that has been reverse
 engineered. So he feels I should just do a full back-up at the moment
 and he will keep checking the hard drive. So that is what I shall do'

 I do not know whether to laugh or cry.

 (originally I attempted to post and share this on my Google+  but
 failed to share with Ubuntu UK Team)
 --
 alan cocks
 Ubuntu user

 --
 ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu UK Team Google+ page?

2011-11-12 Thread Colin Law
On 12 November 2011 15:47, Tony Pursell a...@princeswalk.fsnet.co.uk wrote:
 ...
 Yes,that is the nub of the question I have.  I can 'follow' Ubuntu-UK and
 get their posts on my 'wall', but how does one post something so that
 Ubuntu-UK 'followers' see it?

You don't, that is the big difference between the way facebook and g+
work.  When you share something you say who you want to share it with
so that is under your control (unless you share it as public).  To
share with a group of people you would need to put them in your
circles, or they would need to put you in their circles so they see
(in their stream) anything you make public.  Note that Ubuntu UK is
effectively a single person as far as g+ is concerned, not a group.

Colin

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu UK Team Google+ page?

2011-11-12 Thread Colin Law
On 12 November 2011 16:37, Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote:
 On 12 November 2011 15:47, Tony Pursell a...@princeswalk.fsnet.co.uk wrote:
 ...
 Yes,that is the nub of the question I have.  I can 'follow' Ubuntu-UK and
 get their posts on my 'wall', but how does one post something so that
 Ubuntu-UK 'followers' see it?

 You don't, that is the big difference between the way facebook and g+
 work.  When you share something you say who you want to share it with
 so that is under your control (unless you share it as public).  To
 share with a group of people you would need to put them in your
 circles, or they would need to put you in their circles so they see
 (in their stream) anything you make public.  Note that Ubuntu UK is
 effectively a single person as far as g+ is concerned, not a group.

Further to that, though, if Ubuntu-UK (whoever that is) posts
something that you can see and you comment on it then all who can see
the original post will see your comment.

Colin

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Bug #1 and onwards....

2011-11-12 Thread Colin Law
On 12 November 2011 16:31, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:
 Yesterday I spent time with someone who was interested in using
 Ubuntu. The Live CD ran well in her laptop. However, the live session
 disc utility showed some errors, numerically apparently quite a lot. I
 discussed her considering a new drive, but anyway helped her back up
 some files.

When you say it showed some errors, are you talking about SMART errors or what?

Colin

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Bug #1 and onwards....

2011-11-12 Thread alan c
On 12/11/11 16:43, Colin Law wrote:
 On 12 November 2011 16:31, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:
 Yesterday I spent time with someone who was interested in using
 Ubuntu. The Live CD ran well in her laptop. However, the live session
 disc utility showed some errors, numerically apparently quite a lot. I
 discussed her considering a new drive, but anyway helped her back up
 some files.
 
 When you say it showed some errors, are you talking about SMART errors or 
 what?

Yes, sorry, I was too vague, SMART errors.
I explained to her at the time that we were not looking at her
Windows, and this was information from the drive itself. And then
later her son connected remotely, to Windows presumably, looked at the
file system, saw nothing untoward, and rubbished Ubuntu. That  'NTFS'
drivers was mentioned suggests to me that  he was mistakenly looking
at the file system, not SMART information.

I have always found the Ubuntu disc utility to be reliable, and checks
ot fairly well with a seagate tool I have too. Any other experiences?
-- 
alan cocks
Ubuntu user

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Bug #1 and onwards....

2011-11-12 Thread Gareth France
Ah, now I understand. This same utility saved all the data on my 1TB drive
only a couple of weeks back. It's unwell, very unwell!

On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 5:03 PM, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:

 On 12/11/11 16:43, Colin Law wrote:
  On 12 November 2011 16:31, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:
  Yesterday I spent time with someone who was interested in using
  Ubuntu. The Live CD ran well in her laptop. However, the live session
  disc utility showed some errors, numerically apparently quite a lot. I
  discussed her considering a new drive, but anyway helped her back up
  some files.
 
  When you say it showed some errors, are you talking about SMART errors
 or what?

 Yes, sorry, I was too vague, SMART errors.
 I explained to her at the time that we were not looking at her
 Windows, and this was information from the drive itself. And then
 later her son connected remotely, to Windows presumably, looked at the
 file system, saw nothing untoward, and rubbished Ubuntu. That  'NTFS'
 drivers was mentioned suggests to me that  he was mistakenly looking
 at the file system, not SMART information.

 I have always found the Ubuntu disc utility to be reliable, and checks
 ot fairly well with a seagate tool I have too. Any other experiences?
 --
 alan cocks
 Ubuntu user

 --
 ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu UK Team Google+ page?

2011-11-12 Thread Tony Pursell
On 12 November 2011 16:37, Colin Law clan...@googlemail.com wrote:

 On 12 November 2011 15:47, Tony Pursell a...@princeswalk.fsnet.co.uk
 wrote:
  ...
  Yes,that is the nub of the question I have.  I can 'follow' Ubuntu-UK and
  get their posts on my 'wall', but how does one post something so that
  Ubuntu-UK 'followers' see it?

 You don't, that is the big difference between the way facebook and g+
 work.  When you share something you say who you want to share it with
 so that is under your control (unless you share it as public).  To
 share with a group of people you would need to put them in your
 circles, or they would need to put you in their circles so they see
 (in their stream) anything you make public.  Note that Ubuntu UK is
 effectively a single person as far as g+ is concerned, not a group.

 Colin


So G+ doesn't have something like Facebook has here

http://www.facebook.com/CitizensAdvice?sk=wall

for anyone to post something on their page?  So who can post something as
Ubunt-UK?

Tony
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Bug #1 and onwards....

2011-11-12 Thread Colin Law
On 12 November 2011 17:03, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:
 On 12/11/11 16:43, Colin Law wrote:
 On 12 November 2011 16:31, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:
 Yesterday I spent time with someone who was interested in using
 Ubuntu. The Live CD ran well in her laptop. However, the live session
 disc utility showed some errors, numerically apparently quite a lot. I
 discussed her considering a new drive, but anyway helped her back up
 some files.

 When you say it showed some errors, are you talking about SMART errors or 
 what?

 Yes, sorry, I was too vague, SMART errors.
 I explained to her at the time that we were not looking at her
 Windows, and this was information from the drive itself. And then
 later her son connected remotely, to Windows presumably, looked at the
 file system, saw nothing untoward, and rubbished Ubuntu. That  'NTFS'
 drivers was mentioned suggests to me that  he was mistakenly looking
 at the file system, not SMART information.

You could suggest she installs something like hdtune [1] (the non-pro
version is free for personal use) which should show the SMART data.
Alternatively the disk manufacturers often have diagnostic tools you
can download with will show if there are any problems.

Colin

[1] http://www.hdtune.com

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu UK Team Google+ page?

2011-11-12 Thread Colin Law
On 12 November 2011 17:08, Tony Pursell a...@princeswalk.fsnet.co.uk wrote:
 ...
 So G+ doesn't have something like Facebook has here

 http://www.facebook.com/CitizensAdvice?sk=wall

 for anyone to post something on their page?  So who can post something as
 Ubunt-UK?

Whoever registered the ubuntu-uk  page.

Colin

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Bug #1 and onwards....

2011-11-12 Thread alan c
On 12/11/11 17:12, Colin Law wrote:
 On 12 November 2011 17:03, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:
 On 12/11/11 16:43, Colin Law wrote:
 On 12 November 2011 16:31, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:
 Yesterday I spent time with someone who was interested in using
 Ubuntu. The Live CD ran well in her laptop. However, the live session
 disc utility showed some errors, numerically apparently quite a lot. I
 discussed her considering a new drive, but anyway helped her back up
 some files.

 When you say it showed some errors, are you talking about SMART errors or 
 what?

 Yes, sorry, I was too vague, SMART errors.
 I explained to her at the time that we were not looking at her
 Windows, and this was information from the drive itself. And then
 later her son connected remotely, to Windows presumably, looked at the
 file system, saw nothing untoward, and rubbished Ubuntu. That  'NTFS'
 drivers was mentioned suggests to me that  he was mistakenly looking
 at the file system, not SMART information.
 
 You could suggest she installs something like hdtune [1] (the non-pro
 version is free for personal use) which should show the SMART data.
 Alternatively the disk manufacturers often have diagnostic tools you
 can download with will show if there are any problems.
 
 Colin
 
 [1] http://www.hdtune.com

Thanks I will do that.
-- 
alan cocks
Ubuntu user

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Bug #1 and onwards....

2011-11-12 Thread Grant Sewell
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:37:31 +
Gareth France wrote:

 On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 4:31 PM, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com
 wrote:
 
  Yesterday I spent time with someone who was interested in using
  Ubuntu. The Live CD ran well in her laptop. However, the live
  session disc utility showed some errors, numerically apparently
  quite a lot. I discussed her considering a new drive, but anyway
  helped her back up some files.
 
  She later had contact with her son who connected remotely and
 
  'could not find any significant problems and made the comment your
  HDD is formatted as NTFS the drivers in UBUNTU have only been
  around a short time. Basically a Microsoft file format. that has
  been reverse engineered. So he feels I should just do a full
  back-up at the moment and he will keep checking the hard drive. So
  that is what I shall do'
 
  I do not know whether to laugh or cry.
 
  (originally I attempted to post and share this on my Google+  but
  failed to share with Ubuntu UK Team)
 Intriguing. So why would Ubuntu spot faults on a drive that Windows
 can't? I mean you can understand that guy's perspective, you would
 expect Microsoft of all people to be the best at working with NTFS.

You would expect so, but frequently you would be surprised.

If I remember correctly, the first edition of NTFS was not supposed
to suffer from fragmentation, according to Microsoft, so they didn't
write a defraging tool.

Grant.

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Bug #1 and onwards....

2011-11-12 Thread Gareth France
Nothing surprises me really. I just wish we could shake off the 'industry
standards. It's annoying being bound to NTFS, .doc files etc.

On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Grant Sewell dcg...@thymox.co.uk wrote:

 On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:37:31 +
 Gareth France wrote:

  On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 4:31 PM, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com
  wrote:
 
   Yesterday I spent time with someone who was interested in using
   Ubuntu. The Live CD ran well in her laptop. However, the live
   session disc utility showed some errors, numerically apparently
   quite a lot. I discussed her considering a new drive, but anyway
   helped her back up some files.
  
   She later had contact with her son who connected remotely and
  
   'could not find any significant problems and made the comment your
   HDD is formatted as NTFS the drivers in UBUNTU have only been
   around a short time. Basically a Microsoft file format. that has
   been reverse engineered. So he feels I should just do a full
   back-up at the moment and he will keep checking the hard drive. So
   that is what I shall do'
  
   I do not know whether to laugh or cry.
  
   (originally I attempted to post and share this on my Google+  but
   failed to share with Ubuntu UK Team)
  Intriguing. So why would Ubuntu spot faults on a drive that Windows
  can't? I mean you can understand that guy's perspective, you would
  expect Microsoft of all people to be the best at working with NTFS.

 You would expect so, but frequently you would be surprised.

 If I remember correctly, the first edition of NTFS was not supposed
 to suffer from fragmentation, according to Microsoft, so they didn't
 write a defraging tool.

 Grant.

 --
 ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Bug #1 and onwards....

2011-11-12 Thread Barry Drake

On 12/11/11 17:03, alan c wrote:
Yes, sorry, I was too vague, SMART errors. I explained to her at the 
time that we were not looking at her Windows, and this was information 
from the drive itself. And then later her son connected remotely, to 
Windows presumably, looked at the file system, saw nothing untoward, 
and rubbished Ubuntu.
I came across this last year.  I bought a secondhand drive from Amazon.  
Ubuntu immediately condemned it - it had close to the maximum of 
relocated sectors.  Windows, however, didn't tell me anything!  
Obviously I got in touch with Amazon who gave me a full refund and told 
me to dump the drive.  The seller seems to have disappeared from 
Amazon's list!  They would have got away with it if I were a Windows 
user, as a few folk still seem to be.


I'm told by a friend who was a developer on NTFS that it is an excellent 
filesystem, misused by the overarching operating system.  It only 
fragments because its potential was never properly implemented.  I tend 
to believe this.


Maybe your friend ought to have been allowed to ignore the SMART test.  
The Ubuntu knocker would have had egg on his face in a month or two when 
the drive dies catastrophically!


Regards,Barry.

--
Barry Drake is a member of the the Ubuntu Advertising team.
http://ubuntuadverts.org/


--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Bug #1 and onwards....

2011-11-12 Thread Gareth France
A brutal viewpoint however it does end in a classic 'I told you so' moment.

On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Barry Drake ubuntu-advertis...@gmx.comwrote:

 On 12/11/11 17:03, alan c wrote:

 Yes, sorry, I was too vague, SMART errors. I explained to her at the time
 that we were not looking at her Windows, and this was information from the
 drive itself. And then later her son connected remotely, to Windows
 presumably, looked at the file system, saw nothing untoward, and rubbished
 Ubuntu.

 I came across this last year.  I bought a secondhand drive from Amazon.
  Ubuntu immediately condemned it - it had close to the maximum of relocated
 sectors.  Windows, however, didn't tell me anything!  Obviously I got in
 touch with Amazon who gave me a full refund and told me to dump the drive.
  The seller seems to have disappeared from Amazon's list!  They would have
 got away with it if I were a Windows user, as a few folk still seem to be.

 I'm told by a friend who was a developer on NTFS that it is an excellent
 filesystem, misused by the overarching operating system.  It only fragments
 because its potential was never properly implemented.  I tend to believe
 this.

 Maybe your friend ought to have been allowed to ignore the SMART test.
  The Ubuntu knocker would have had egg on his face in a month or two when
 the drive dies catastrophically!

 Regards,Barry.

 --
 Barry Drake is a member of the the Ubuntu Advertising team.
 http://ubuntuadverts.org/


 --
 ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/**mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-ukhttps://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/**UKTeam/ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] Ubuntu UK Team Google+ page?

2011-11-12 Thread Dianne Reuby
This is a handy diagram of how Google+ works.
https://plus.google.com/u/0/106393478695568433143/posts/bXh4UpWh3Kc

But as I still have trouble with Facebook, I don't expect to be an
expert on Google+ any time soon. :(

Dianne


-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Bug #1 and onwards....

2011-11-12 Thread alan c
On 12/11/11 18:41, Barry Drake wrote:
 On 12/11/11 17:03, alan c wrote:
 Yes, sorry, I was too vague, SMART errors. I explained to her at the 
 time that we were not looking at her Windows, and this was information 
 from the drive itself. And then later her son connected remotely, to 
 Windows presumably, looked at the file system, saw nothing untoward, 
 and rubbished Ubuntu.
 I came across this last year.  I bought a secondhand drive from Amazon.  
 Ubuntu immediately condemned it - it had close to the maximum of 
 relocated sectors.  Windows, however, didn't tell me anything!  
 Obviously I got in touch with Amazon who gave me a full refund and told 
 me to dump the drive.  The seller seems to have disappeared from 
 Amazon's list!  They would have got away with it if I were a Windows 
 user, as a few folk still seem to be.
 
 I'm told by a friend who was a developer on NTFS that it is an excellent 
 filesystem, misused by the overarching operating system.  It only 
 fragments because its potential was never properly implemented.  I tend 
 to believe this.
 
 Maybe your friend ought to have been allowed to ignore the SMART test.  
 The Ubuntu knocker would have had egg on his face in a month or two when 
 the drive dies catastrophically!

(grim smile)

I have replied with a number of informative and polite and appropriate
messages.

The code of conduct would be proud of me! (note to self: I must try to
understand exactly how to  sign it).

The person is still saying she wants to run Ubuntu (alongside), and I
have  suggested
1) she uses www.hdtune.com to do a double check for herself (or
relative) and
2) that her relative please resize Windows first, then I will  be able
to help her with installing Ubuntu. I await  this situation.

My hopeful objective is to keep her and her associate on board, and
quite possibly, in time, interest her relative too, when he becomes
better informed. I live in hope as you see.

Meanwhile, during today, I cannot tell you how much my diplomacy chip
has been overheating.
-- 
alan cocks
Ubuntu user

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Bug #1 and onwards....

2011-11-12 Thread Alan Pope


On 12 Nov 2011, at 23:29, alan c aecl...@candt.waitrose.com wrote:

 On 12/11/11 18:41, Barry Drake wrote:
 On 12/11/11 17:03, alan c wrote:
 Yes, sorry, I was too vague, SMART errors. I explained to her at the 
 time that we were not looking at her Windows, and this was information 
 from the drive itself. And then later her son connected remotely, to 
 Windows presumably, looked at the file system, saw nothing untoward, 
 and rubbished Ubuntu.
 I came across this last year.  I bought a secondhand drive from Amazon.  
 Ubuntu immediately condemned it - it had close to the maximum of 
 relocated sectors.  Windows, however, didn't tell me anything!  
 Obviously I got in touch with Amazon who gave me a full refund and told 
 me to dump the drive.  The seller seems to have disappeared from 
 Amazon's list!  They would have got away with it if I were a Windows 
 user, as a few folk still seem to be.
 
 I'm told by a friend who was a developer on NTFS that it is an excellent 
 filesystem, misused by the overarching operating system.  It only 
 fragments because its potential was never properly implemented.  I tend 
 to believe this.
 
 Maybe your friend ought to have been allowed to ignore the SMART test.  
 The Ubuntu knocker would have had egg on his face in a month or two when 
 the drive dies catastrophically!
 
 (grim smile)
 
 I have replied with a number of informative and polite and appropriate
 messages.
 
 The code of conduct would be proud of me! (note to self: I must try to
 understand exactly how to  sign it).
 
 The person is still saying she wants to run Ubuntu (alongside), and I
 have  suggested
 1) she uses www.hdtune.com to do a double check for herself (or
 relative) and
 2) that her relative please resize Windows first, then I will  be able
 to help her with installing Ubuntu. I await  this situation.
 
 My hopeful objective is to keep her and her associate on board, and
 quite possibly, in time, interest her relative too, when he becomes
 better informed. I live in hope as you see.
 
 


What evidence did you provide to backup you disk failure claim?

Log of smart tools output or screenshots from disk utility may be useful here 
otherwise it's your word against his.

Al.
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Bug #1 and onwards....

2011-11-12 Thread Avi Greenbury
alan c wrote:

 I have always found the Ubuntu disc utility to be reliable, and checks
 ot fairly well with a seagate tool I have too. Any other experiences?

Well, it's as good as SMART is, which is vague at best.

-- 
Avi

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/