Re: [ubuntu-uk] Application responsiveness, Windows and Ubuntu

2008-04-06 Thread Kris Douglas
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Dave Morley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 17:21 +0100, Jmaes Edward Grabham wrote:
>  > Matthew Wild wrote:
>  > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Chris Rowson
>  > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > >
>  > >> Hi there,
>  > >>
>  > >>  My little boy likes playing various flash based games from children's
>  > >>  websites. I find that in Ubuntu, many of these run pretty badly and as
>  > >>  this is all he uses my old laptop for, I decided to put Windows XP
>  > >>  back onto it to see the if it would make any difference for him.
>  > >>
>  > >>  I've just installed Firefox 3 Beta 5, Flash and a Java runtime
>  > >>  environment and seen how it runs.
>  > >>
>  > >>  Strangely Firefox runs about twice as fast under Win XP than on Hardy
>  > >>  (although Hardy is on a laptop which is twice as powerful). Rendering
>  > >>  and application response are greatly improved under Windows and Flash
>  > >>  content flys.
>  > >>
>  > >>  I'm bamboozled to say the least!
>  > >>
>  > >>  Are these particular applications created specifically for Windows
>  > >>  then ported to Linux? It's wierd, I've tried this on different
>  > >>  hardware and find it to be the case on the machines I've tested.
>  > >>
>  > >>  I wondered if anyone else has tried this out or have any reasons why
>  > >>  it would be so?
>  > >>
>  > >>
>  > >
>  > > If you are only talking about when flash pages are open, then yes, I
>  > > notice it too. My CPU is constantly at about 10%.
>  > >
>  > > This is to be expected, Flash is closed-source after all, and you are
>  > > trusting a company that probably doesn't see its Linux user-base as
>  > > significant as the Windows one.
>  > >
>  > > Can't wait for Gnash to become a real alternative, until then I use
>  > > Flash as little as possible :)
>  > >
>  > > Matthew.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > Yeah, I cant wait for gnash to gather speed... Im sick of having to
>  > force 32bit firefox, just so I can go on youtube!
>  >
>  You don't need to with hardy it installs npwrapper which allows 32bit
>  apps to run inside 64bit so flash and wine both work.
>  --
>  Seek That Thy Might Know
>

It's always handy to have someone in the know =D

-- 
Kris Douglas
 Softdel Limited Hosting Services
 Web: www.softdel.net
 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Application responsiveness, Windows and Ubuntu

2008-04-06 Thread James Grabham
Oh yeah,  found this on ubuntuforums

"I fixed this problem by removing ia32-libs, flashplugin-nonfree and
nspluginwrapper, then installing ia32-libs_2.1ubuntu3_amd64.deb from
http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/...e/i/ia32-libs/ (It is an older
version than what installs in apt-get), then installing flashplugin-nonfree.
Thanks."

I followed it, and now it works =D

On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Dave Morley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 17:21 +0100, Jmaes Edward Grabham wrote:
> > Matthew Wild wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Chris Rowson
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi there,
> > >>
> > >>  My little boy likes playing various flash based games from
> children's
> > >>  websites. I find that in Ubuntu, many of these run pretty badly and
> as
> > >>  this is all he uses my old laptop for, I decided to put Windows XP
> > >>  back onto it to see the if it would make any difference for him.
> > >>
> > >>  I've just installed Firefox 3 Beta 5, Flash and a Java runtime
> > >>  environment and seen how it runs.
> > >>
> > >>  Strangely Firefox runs about twice as fast under Win XP than on
> Hardy
> > >>  (although Hardy is on a laptop which is twice as powerful).
> Rendering
> > >>  and application response are greatly improved under Windows and
> Flash
> > >>  content flys.
> > >>
> > >>  I'm bamboozled to say the least!
> > >>
> > >>  Are these particular applications created specifically for Windows
> > >>  then ported to Linux? It's wierd, I've tried this on different
> > >>  hardware and find it to be the case on the machines I've tested.
> > >>
> > >>  I wondered if anyone else has tried this out or have any reasons why
> > >>  it would be so?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > If you are only talking about when flash pages are open, then yes, I
> > > notice it too. My CPU is constantly at about 10%.
> > >
> > > This is to be expected, Flash is closed-source after all, and you are
> > > trusting a company that probably doesn't see its Linux user-base as
> > > significant as the Windows one.
> > >
> > > Can't wait for Gnash to become a real alternative, until then I use
> > > Flash as little as possible :)
> > >
> > > Matthew.
> > >
> > >
> > Yeah, I cant wait for gnash to gather speed... Im sick of having to
> > force 32bit firefox, just so I can go on youtube!
> >
> You don't need to with hardy it installs npwrapper which allows 32bit
> apps to run inside 64bit so flash and wine both work.
> --
> Seek That Thy Might Know
>
> --
> ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
> https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/
>
>


-- 
Mr JE Grabham
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Application responsiveness, Windows and Ubuntu

2008-04-06 Thread Dave Morley
On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 17:21 +0100, Jmaes Edward Grabham wrote:
> Matthew Wild wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Chris Rowson
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >   
> >> Hi there,
> >>
> >>  My little boy likes playing various flash based games from children's
> >>  websites. I find that in Ubuntu, many of these run pretty badly and as
> >>  this is all he uses my old laptop for, I decided to put Windows XP
> >>  back onto it to see the if it would make any difference for him.
> >>
> >>  I've just installed Firefox 3 Beta 5, Flash and a Java runtime
> >>  environment and seen how it runs.
> >>
> >>  Strangely Firefox runs about twice as fast under Win XP than on Hardy
> >>  (although Hardy is on a laptop which is twice as powerful). Rendering
> >>  and application response are greatly improved under Windows and Flash
> >>  content flys.
> >>
> >>  I'm bamboozled to say the least!
> >>
> >>  Are these particular applications created specifically for Windows
> >>  then ported to Linux? It's wierd, I've tried this on different
> >>  hardware and find it to be the case on the machines I've tested.
> >>
> >>  I wondered if anyone else has tried this out or have any reasons why
> >>  it would be so?
> >>
> >> 
> >
> > If you are only talking about when flash pages are open, then yes, I
> > notice it too. My CPU is constantly at about 10%.
> >
> > This is to be expected, Flash is closed-source after all, and you are
> > trusting a company that probably doesn't see its Linux user-base as
> > significant as the Windows one.
> >
> > Can't wait for Gnash to become a real alternative, until then I use
> > Flash as little as possible :)
> >
> > Matthew.
> >
> >   
> Yeah, I cant wait for gnash to gather speed... Im sick of having to 
> force 32bit firefox, just so I can go on youtube!
> 
You don't need to with hardy it installs npwrapper which allows 32bit
apps to run inside 64bit so flash and wine both work.
-- 
Seek That Thy Might Know


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Application responsiveness, Windows and Ubuntu

2008-04-06 Thread Jmaes Edward Grabham
Matthew Wild wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Chris Rowson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> Hi there,
>>
>>  My little boy likes playing various flash based games from children's
>>  websites. I find that in Ubuntu, many of these run pretty badly and as
>>  this is all he uses my old laptop for, I decided to put Windows XP
>>  back onto it to see the if it would make any difference for him.
>>
>>  I've just installed Firefox 3 Beta 5, Flash and a Java runtime
>>  environment and seen how it runs.
>>
>>  Strangely Firefox runs about twice as fast under Win XP than on Hardy
>>  (although Hardy is on a laptop which is twice as powerful). Rendering
>>  and application response are greatly improved under Windows and Flash
>>  content flys.
>>
>>  I'm bamboozled to say the least!
>>
>>  Are these particular applications created specifically for Windows
>>  then ported to Linux? It's wierd, I've tried this on different
>>  hardware and find it to be the case on the machines I've tested.
>>
>>  I wondered if anyone else has tried this out or have any reasons why
>>  it would be so?
>>
>> 
>
> If you are only talking about when flash pages are open, then yes, I
> notice it too. My CPU is constantly at about 10%.
>
> This is to be expected, Flash is closed-source after all, and you are
> trusting a company that probably doesn't see its Linux user-base as
> significant as the Windows one.
>
> Can't wait for Gnash to become a real alternative, until then I use
> Flash as little as possible :)
>
> Matthew.
>
>   
Yeah, I cant wait for gnash to gather speed... Im sick of having to 
force 32bit firefox, just so I can go on youtube!

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Application responsiveness, Windows and Ubuntu

2008-04-06 Thread Chris Rowson
>  > Hi there,
>  >
>  >  My little boy likes playing various flash based games from children's
>  >  websites. I find that in Ubuntu, many of these run pretty badly and as
>  >  this is all he uses my old laptop for, I decided to put Windows XP
>  >  back onto it to see the if it would make any difference for him.
>  >
>  >  I've just installed Firefox 3 Beta 5, Flash and a Java runtime
>  >  environment and seen how it runs.
>  >
>  >  Strangely Firefox runs about twice as fast under Win XP than on Hardy
>  >  (although Hardy is on a laptop which is twice as powerful). Rendering
>  >  and application response are greatly improved under Windows and Flash
>  >  content flys.
>  >
>  >  I'm bamboozled to say the least!
>  >
>  >  Are these particular applications created specifically for Windows
>  >  then ported to Linux? It's wierd, I've tried this on different
>  >  hardware and find it to be the case on the machines I've tested.
>  >
>  >  I wondered if anyone else has tried this out or have any reasons why
>  >  it would be so?
>  >
>
>  If you are only talking about when flash pages are open, then yes, I
>  notice it too. My CPU is constantly at about 10%.
>
>  This is to be expected, Flash is closed-source after all, and you are
>  trusting a company that probably doesn't see its Linux user-base as
>  significant as the Windows one.
>
>  Can't wait for Gnash to become a real alternative, until then I use
>  Flash as little as possible :)
>
>  Matthew.

I suppose that may well be the case. I also see some level of slowness
in sites like Gmail for instance (although I believe this is well
documented). It probably is a case of most application developers
develop for Windows and port to Linux when/if they can be bothered.

I suppose until then I'll have to use Windows for people relying
heavily on Flash/Web apps etc.

Chris

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Application responsiveness, Windows and Ubuntu

2008-04-06 Thread Matthew Wild
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Chris Rowson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>  My little boy likes playing various flash based games from children's
>  websites. I find that in Ubuntu, many of these run pretty badly and as
>  this is all he uses my old laptop for, I decided to put Windows XP
>  back onto it to see the if it would make any difference for him.
>
>  I've just installed Firefox 3 Beta 5, Flash and a Java runtime
>  environment and seen how it runs.
>
>  Strangely Firefox runs about twice as fast under Win XP than on Hardy
>  (although Hardy is on a laptop which is twice as powerful). Rendering
>  and application response are greatly improved under Windows and Flash
>  content flys.
>
>  I'm bamboozled to say the least!
>
>  Are these particular applications created specifically for Windows
>  then ported to Linux? It's wierd, I've tried this on different
>  hardware and find it to be the case on the machines I've tested.
>
>  I wondered if anyone else has tried this out or have any reasons why
>  it would be so?
>

If you are only talking about when flash pages are open, then yes, I
notice it too. My CPU is constantly at about 10%.

This is to be expected, Flash is closed-source after all, and you are
trusting a company that probably doesn't see its Linux user-base as
significant as the Windows one.

Can't wait for Gnash to become a real alternative, until then I use
Flash as little as possible :)

Matthew.

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Application responsiveness, Windows and Ubuntu

2008-04-06 Thread Chris Rowson
>  Chris Rowson wrote:
>  | I wondered if anyone else has tried this out or have any reasons why
>  | it would be so?
>
>
>  The only question which springs to my mind is whether you're using the
>  Mesa software graphics drivers or the binary drivers for your graphics card?
>
>  I think that this should give you a clue about which driver you are
>  definitely using (without poking around in xorg.conf).
>
>  $ glxinfo|grep vendor
>  server glx vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation
>  client glx vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation
>  OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation
>
>
>  Plus to test your opengl performance you can run the following - if it's
>  really jerky then that's probably due to your graphics card:
>
>  $ glxgears
>
>  I get between 1500 and 2500 FPS for reference.
>
>  System->Administration->Restricted Drivers Manager is where I enabled my
>  binary Nvidia drivers - they aren't open source so Ubuntu disables them
>  by default.
>
>  I'm not an expert so I'm sure you'll get better advice but hopefully
>  this will get you started.
>
>  - --
>  Stephen O'Neill

Hi Stephen,

This situation occurs on three computers I can think of, one running
NVIDIA, one ATI and one an Intel graphics card. All running the binary
drivers from the restricted drivers manager.

I don't think this is a graphics problem to be honest...

If anyone is interested in testing this. Take a dual-boot laptop/pc.
Visit the cartoonito.co.uk website and try a few games using Firefox
and the Flash plugin under Windows XP, then under Ubuntu.

See what the responsiveness/smoothness of web browser operations, for example:

* Type a url into the address bar in Firefox 3. The browser begins to
scroll up previously accessed sites as suggestions. Note the
performance under both OS's.

* Try some of the Flash games mentioned under both OS's. Note the
performance of animations etc.

I'm sure it's not me going mad!

Chris

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


Re: [ubuntu-uk] Application responsiveness, Windows and Ubuntu

2008-04-05 Thread Stephen O'Neill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Chris Rowson wrote:
| I wondered if anyone else has tried this out or have any reasons why
| it would be so?


The only question which springs to my mind is whether you're using the
Mesa software graphics drivers or the binary drivers for your graphics card?

I think that this should give you a clue about which driver you are
definitely using (without poking around in xorg.conf).

$ glxinfo|grep vendor
server glx vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation
client glx vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation
OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation


Plus to test your opengl performance you can run the following - if it's
really jerky then that's probably due to your graphics card:

$ glxgears

I get between 1500 and 2500 FPS for reference.

System->Administration->Restricted Drivers Manager is where I enabled my
binary Nvidia drivers - they aren't open source so Ubuntu disables them
by default.

I'm not an expert so I'm sure you'll get better advice but hopefully
this will get you started.

- --
Stephen O'Neill
w: http://www.thefloatingfrog.co.uk/
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFH+HMAJ+Auntu1v4QRArCMAJ0f2s1dFfORIFVTC4OJlU8efjc1sgCgiUwx
0n5LVfxYHJi9EmGJeS1ZzJ0=
=vV/l
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/


[ubuntu-uk] Application responsiveness, Windows and Ubuntu

2008-04-05 Thread Chris Rowson
Hi there,

My little boy likes playing various flash based games from children's
websites. I find that in Ubuntu, many of these run pretty badly and as
this is all he uses my old laptop for, I decided to put Windows XP
back onto it to see the if it would make any difference for him.

I've just installed Firefox 3 Beta 5, Flash and a Java runtime
environment and seen how it runs.

Strangely Firefox runs about twice as fast under Win XP than on Hardy
(although Hardy is on a laptop which is twice as powerful). Rendering
and application response are greatly improved under Windows and Flash
content flys.

I'm bamboozled to say the least!

Are these particular applications created specifically for Windows
then ported to Linux? It's wierd, I've tried this on different
hardware and find it to be the case on the machines I've tested.

I wondered if anyone else has tried this out or have any reasons why
it would be so?

Chris

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/